[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02 03 04

Internet Draft                                              Gordon Good
draft-good-ldap-changelog-04.txt                              Loudcloud
Intended Category: Informational                         Ludovic Poitou
Expires: September 2003                                Sun Microsystems

                                                           1 March 2003



         Definition of an Object Class to Hold LDAP Change Records



Status of this Memo

   This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
   months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
   at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts as
   reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.

   Please see the Copyright Section near the end of this document for
   more information.


1. Abstract

   In order to support more flexible replication methods, it is
   desirable to specify some manner in which an LDAP client may
   retrieve a set of changes that have been applied to an LDAP server's
   database.  The client, who may be another LDAP server, may then
   choose to update its own replicated copy of the data.  This document
   specifies an object class that may be used to represent changes
   applied to an LDAP server.  It also specifies a method for
   discovering the location of the container object that holds these


Good & Poitou                                                 [Page 1]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Change Record Object Class            March 2003

   change records, so that clients and servers have a common rendezvous
   point for this information.


2. Background and Intended Usage

   This document describes an object class that can be used to
   represent changes that have been applied to a single directory
   server.

   This object class is not intended to be used in a multi-mastered
   replication environment, where changes can occur on more than one
   master server.

   This document also suggests a common location for a container to
   hold these objects.

   A client may update its local copy of directory information by
   reading the entries within this container, and applying the changes
   to its local database.

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", and "MAY" in this document
   are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [3].


3. New Attribute Types Used in the changeLogEntry Object Class

   ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.5
       NAME 'changeNumber'
       DESC 'a number which uniquely identifies a change made to a
             directory entry'
       SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27
       EQUALITY integerMatch
       ORDERING integerOrderingMatch
       SINGLE-VALUE
   )

   ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.6
       NAME 'targetDN'
       DESC 'the DN of the entry which was modified'
       EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch
       SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12
       SINGLE-VALUE
    )

   ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.7
       NAME 'changeType'
       DESC 'the type of change made to an entry'
       EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
       SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15

Good & Poitou         Expires September 1, 2003              [Page 2]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Change Record Object Class            March 2003

       SINGLE-VALUE
   )

   ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.8
       NAME 'changes'
       DESC 'a set of changes to apply to an entry'
       SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40
   )

   ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.9
       NAME 'newRDN'
       DESC 'the new RDN of an entry which is the target of a
             modrdn operation'
       EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch
       SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12
       SINGLE-VALUE
   )

   ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.10
       NAME 'deleteOldRDN'
       DESC 'a flag which indicates if the old RDN should be retained
             as an attribute of the entry'
       EQUALITY booleanMatch
       SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7
       SINGLE-VALUE
    )

   ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.11
       NAME 'newSuperior'
       DESC 'the new parent of an entry which is the target of a
             moddn operation'
       EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch
       SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12
       SINGLE-VALUE
   )


4. Schema Definition of the changeLogEntry Object Class

   ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.2.1
       NAME 'changeLogEntry'
       SUP top
       STRUCTURAL
       MUST ( changeNumber $ targetDN $ changeType )
       MAY ( changes $ newRDN $ deleteOldRDN $ newSuperior )
   )


5. Discussion of changeLogEntry Attributes:



Good & Poitou         Expires September 1, 2003              [Page 3]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Change Record Object Class            March 2003

   changeNumber: the change number, as assigned by the supplier.  This
   integer MUST strictly increase as new entries are added, and must
   always be unique within a given server.
   Syntax: INTEGER

   targetdn: the distinguished name of the entry which was added,
   modified or deleted.  In the case of a modrdn operation, the
   targetdn gives the DN of the entry before it was modified.
   Syntax: DN

   changeType: the type of change. One of: "add", "delete", "modify",
   "modrdn".  Later RFCs may define additional values for changeType.
   Syntax: DirectoryString

   changes: the changes which were made to the directory server.  These
   changes are in LDIF format, which is described in [1].
   Syntax: OctetString

   newRDN: the new RDN (Relative Distinguished Name) of the entry, if
   the changeType is "modrdn".  If the changeType attribute does not
   have the value "modrdn", then there should be no values contained in
   the newRDN attribute.
   Syntax: DN

   deleteOldRDN: a flag which tells whether the old RDN of the entry
   should be retained as a distinguished attribute of the entry, or
   should be deleted.  A value of "FALSE" indicates that the RDN should
   be retained as a distinguished attribute, and a value of "TRUE"
   indicates that it should not be retained as a distinguished
   attribute of the entry.  If any value other than "TRUE" or "FALSE"
   is contained in the deleteOldRDN, the RDN should be retained as a
   distinguished attribute (that is, "FALSE" is the default if no
   values are present, or if illegal values are present).
   Syntax: BOOLEAN

   newSuperior: if present, gives the name of the entry which becomes
   the immediate superior of the existing entry.  This optional
   attribute reflects LDAPv3 functionality, and MUST NOT be generated
   by LDAPv2 servers [2].
   Syntax: DN


6. Discussion of the changeLogEntry object class

   The changeLogEntry object class is used to represent changes made to
   a directory server.  The set of changes made to a directory server,
   then, is given by the ordered set of all entries within the
   changelog container, ordered by changeNumber. As a changeNumber is
   unique, it is recommended that the changeNumber attribute be used to
   name changeLogEntry entries.


Good & Poitou         Expires September 1, 2003              [Page 4]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Change Record Object Class            March 2003

   A client may synchronize its local copy of a remote directory
   server's contents by searching the remote server's changelog
   container for any entries where the changenumber is greater than or
   equal to the last change previously retrieved from that server.  If
   the entry with the changenumber matching the last change retrieved
   is not returned in the search results, then the server's changelog
   has been trimmed.  The client must then fall back to reading the
   entire directory to bring its copy in sync with the server's.

   Assuming that the client has successfully retrieved one or more
   changelog entries from the server, it can then use the information
   contained in each entry to update the corresponding entry (named by
   the targetDN attribute) in its local copy of the database.

   Note that, due to access control restrictions, the client is not
   guaranteed read access to the "changes" attribute.  If the client
   discovers that the "changes" attribute has no values, then it must
   read the entry given by the targetDN attribute, possibly only
   retrieving attributes it deems "interesting".  However, in the case
   of delete and modrdn operations, there is never a "changes"
   attribute, so it is never necessary to read the target entry in
   these cases.

   Servers implementing this document MUST trim the changeLogEntry
   entries only in changeNumber order.


7. Examples of the changeLogEntry object class

   In each example below, the "changes" attribute is shown in plain
   text, with embedded new-line characters.  This is done for clarity.
   It is intended that new-line characters be stored in the entry
   literally, not encoded in any way. If a "changes" attribute value is
   stored in an LDIF file, it must base-64 encoded.

   Example 1: A changeLogEntry representing the addition of a new entry
   to the directory

   dn: changenumber=1923, cn=changelog
   changenumber: 1923
   targetdn: cn=Barbara Jensen, ou=Accounting, o=Ace Industry, c=US
   changetype: add
   changes: cn: Barbara Jensen\ncn: Babs Jensen\nsn: Jensen\n
    givenname: Barbara\ntelephonenumber: +1 212 555-1212\nmail:
    babs@ace.com\nobjectclass: top\nobjectclass: person\nobjectclass:
    organizationalPerson\nobjectclass: inetOrgPerson

   Example 2: A changeLogEntry representing the deletion of an entry
   from the directory

   dn: changenumber=2933, cn=changelog

Good & Poitou         Expires September 1, 2003              [Page 5]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Change Record Object Class            March 2003

   changenumber: 2933
   targetdn: cn=Gern Jensen, ou=Product Testing, o=Ace Industry, c=US
   changetype: delete

   Example 3: A changeLogEntry representing the modification of an
   entry in the directory

   dn: changenumber=5883, cn=changelog
   changenumber: 5883
   targetdn: cn=Bjorn Jensen, ou=Product Development, o=Ace Industry,
   c=US
   changetype: modify
   changes: delete: telephonenumber\ntelephonenumber: 1212\n-\n
    add: telephonenumber\ntelephonenumber: +1 212 555 1212\n-

   Example 4: A changeLogEntry representing a modrdn operation
   performed on an entry in the directory

   dn: changenumber=10042, cn=changelog
   changenumber: 10042
   targetdn: cn=Bjorn Jensen, ou=Product Development, o=Ace Industry,
   c=US
   changetype: modrdn
   newrdn: cn=Bjorn J Jensen
   deleteoldrdn: FALSE


8. Location of the container containing changeLogEntry objects

   For LDAPv3 servers, the location of the container that holds
   changeLogEntry objects is obtained by reading the "changeLog"
   attribute of a server's root DSE.  For example, if the container's
   root is "cn=changelog", then the root DSE must have an attribute
   named "changeLog" with the value "cn=changelog".

   The "changelog" attribute is defined as follows:

   (   2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.35
       NAME 'changelog'
       DESC 'the distinguished name of the entry which contains
             the set of entries comprising this server's changelog'
       EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch
       SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12
   )

   For LDAPv2 servers, the name of the changelog container must be
   "cn=changelog".


9. Interoperability between LDAPv2 and LDAPv3 implementations


Good & Poitou         Expires September 1, 2003              [Page 6]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Change Record Object Class            March 2003

   Implementors are discouraged from developing implementations in
   which an LDAPv2 server is synchronized from an LDAPv3 server using
   the changelog method described in this document. Problems can arise
   when an LDAPv2 server reads a "moddn" changelog entry which gives a
   new superior. Since LDAPv2 does not support such an operation, there
   is no way for the v2 server to perform the moddn operation
   atomically. It could, of course, delete all the entries under the
   old superior and add them under the new superior entry, but such an
   operation would either not be atomic, or require extensive server-
   side support on the LDAPv2 server to make the operation appear as if
   it were atomic.

   It is recommended that servers who only implement LDAPv2 should
   refuse to synchronize from LDAPv3 servers. Before beginning
   synchronization, the LDAPv2 server should attempt to read the root
   DSE of the supplier server. If the root DSE is present, and the
   supportedldapversion attribute contained in the root DSE contains
   the value "3", then the LDAPv2 server should immediately disconnect
   and proceed no further with synchronization.


10. Security Considerations

   Servers implementing this scheme MUST NOT allow the "changes"
   attribute to be generally readable.  The "changes" attribute
   contains all modifications made to an entry, and some changes may
   contain sensitive data, e.g. Passwords.

   If a server does allow read access on the "changes: attribute to a
   particular bound DN, then that DN should be trusted.  For example,
   two cooperating servers may exchange the password for some DN that
   is granted read access to the "changes" attribute of the changeLog.
   This would allow one server to retrieve changes and apply them
   directly to its database.

   In situations where the "changes" attribute is not readable by a
   client, that client may still use the entries in the changeLog to
   construct a list of entry DNs which are known to have changed since
   the last time the client synchronized.  The client may then read
   each of those entries, subject to whatever access control is in
   effect on the server, and update its local copy of each entry.

   Servers implementing this scheme should disallow write access to the
   changelog container object and all entries contained within.


11.IANA Considerations

   The OIDs used in this document have been assigned by Netscape
   Communications Corp, under its ANSI-assigned private enterprise
   allocation, for use in this specification.

Good & Poitou         Expires September 1, 2003              [Page 7]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Change Record Object Class            March 2003



12. Acknowledgements

   This material is based in part upon work supported by the National
   Science Foundation under Grant No. NCR-9416667.


13. Normative References

   [1] Good, G., "The LDAP Data Interchange Format (LDIF) - Technical
   Specification", RFC 2849, June 2000.

   [2] Wahl, M., Howes, T., Kille, S., "Lightweight Directory Access
   Protocol (v3)", RFC 2251, July 1997.

   [3] S. Bradner, "Key Words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
   Levels", RFC 2119, March 1997.


14. Authors's Address

   Gordon Good
   Loudcloud, Inc.
   599 N. Mathilda Avenue
   Sunnyvale, CA 94085
   USA
   Phone:  +1 408 744-7300
   EMail:  ggood@loudcloud.com

   Ludovic Poitou
   Sun Microsystems Inc.
   180 Avenue de l'Europe
   Zirst de Montbonnot
   38334 Saint Ismier cedex
   France
   Phone: +33 476 188 212
   Email: ludovic.poitou@Sun.com


15. Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003).  All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph
   are included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing

Good & Poitou         Expires September 1, 2003              [Page 8]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Change Record Object Class            March 2003

   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the  purpose of
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE AUTHORS, THE INTERNET SOCIETY, AND THE
   INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR
   IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.




































Good & Poitou         Expires September 1, 2003              [Page 9]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.107, available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/