[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: (draft-link-avt-rtp-eac3) 00 01 RFC 4598

Network Working Group                                            B. Link
Internet-Draft                                        Dolby Laboratories
Expires: October 21, 2006                                 April 19, 2006

                  RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at

   This Internet-Draft will expire on October 21, 2006.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).


   This document describes an RTP payload format for transporting
   Enhanced AC-3 (E-AC-3) encoded audio data.  E-AC-3 is a high quality,
   multichannel audio coding format and is an extension of the AC-3
   audio coding format, which is used in US HDTV, DVD, cable and
   satellite television and other media.  E-AC-3 is an optional audio
   format in US and world-wide digital television and high definition
   DVD formats.  The RTP payload format as presented in this document
   includes support for data fragmentation.

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006                [Page 1]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2.  Overview of Enhanced-AC-3  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     2.1.  E-AC-3 Bit Stream  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
       2.1.1.  Sync Frames and Audio Blocks . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
       2.1.2.  Programs and Substreams  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
       2.1.3.  Frame Sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   3.  RTP E-AC-3 Header Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
   4.  RTP E-AC-3 Payload Format  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
     4.1.  Payload Specific Header  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     4.2.  Fragmentation of E-AC-3 Frames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
     4.3.  Concatenation of E-AC-3 Frames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
     4.4.  Carriage of AC-3 Frames  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
   5.  Types and Names  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
     5.1.  Media Type Registration  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
     5.2.  SDP Usage  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
   6.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
   7.  Congestion Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
   8.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
   9.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
     9.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
     9.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
   Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
   Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 18

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006                [Page 2]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

1.  Introduction

   The Enhanced AC-3 (E-AC-3) [ETSI] audio coding system is built on a
   foundation of AC-3.  It is an enhancement and extension to AC-3,
   which is an existing audio coding standard commonly used for DVD,
   broadcast, cable, and satellite television content.  E-AC-3 is
   designed to enable operation at both higher and lower data rates than
   AC-3, provide expanded channel configurations, and provide greater
   flexibility for carriage of multiple audio program elements.  The
   relationship between E-AC-3 and AC-3 provides for low-loss, low-cost
   conversion between the two and makes E-AC-3 especially suitable in
   applications that require compatibility with the existing broadcast-
   reception and audio/video decoding infrastructure.  Dolby Digital
   Plus is a branded version of Enhanced AC-3.

   E-AC-3 has been standardized within both the European
   Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) and the Advanced
   Television Standards Committee (ATSC).  It is an optional audio
   format for use in US (ATSC) and DVB digital television transmission.
   It is also a required audio format for use in the HD-DVD optical-
   storage media format and proposed for use in the Blu-ray Disc format.

   There is a need to stream E-AC-3 content over IP networks.  E-AC-3 is
   primarily used in audio-for-video applications, so RTP serves well as
   a transport solution with its mechanism for synchronizing streams.
   Applications for streaming E-AC-3 include Internet Protocol
   television (IPTV), video on demand, interactive features of next
   generation DVD formats, and transfer of movies across a home network.

   Section 2 gives a brief overview of the E-AC-3 algorithm.  Section 3
   specifies values for fields in the RTP header, while Section 4
   specifies the E-AC-3 payload format, itself.  Section 5 discusses
   media types and SDP usage.  Security considerations are covered in
   Section 6, congestion control in Section 7, and IANA considerations
   in Section 8.

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

2.  Overview of Enhanced-AC-3

   Enhanced AC-3 (E-AC-3) is a frequency-domain perceptual audio coding
   system.  Time blocks of an audio signal are converted from the time
   domain to the frequency domain by a transform (the Modified Discrete
   Cosine Transform (MDCT)) so that a model of the human auditory
   perceptual system can be applied.  In this domain, quantization noise

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006                [Page 3]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

   can be constrained to specific frequency regions.  The perceptual
   model predicts in which frequency regions the auditory system will be
   least able to detect the quantization noise from data rate reduction.
   A more detailed technical description of E-AC-3 can be found in this
   paper [2004AES].

   E-AC-3 is built upon a foundation of AC-3.  More background on AC-3
   can be found in the AC-3 specification [ETSI], a technical paper
   [1994AES], and the AC-3 RTP payload format [RFC4184].  The frame
   structure and meta-data of AC-3 are maintained.  E-AC-3 content is
   not directly compatible with AC-3 decoders, but it can be converted
   to the AC-3 format to provide compatibility with existing decoders.
   Because AC-3 is the foundation of E-AC-3, conversion between the two
   formats can be done in a way that minimizes the degradations
   associated with tandem coding.  Additionally, the computational cost
   of the conversion is reduced compared to a full decode and re-encode.

   E-AC-3 exploits psychoacoustic phenomena that cause a significant
   fraction of the information contained in a typical audio signal to be
   inaudible.  Substantial data reduction occurs via the removal of
   inaudible information contained in an audio stream.  Source coding
   techniques are further used to reduce the data rate.

   Like most perceptual coders, E-AC-3 operates in the frequency domain.
   A 512-point MDCT transform is taken with 50% overlap, providing 256
   new frequency samples.  Frequency samples are then converted to
   exponents and mantissas.  Exponents are differentially encoded.
   Mantissas are allocated a varying number of bits depending on the
   audibility of the spectral components associated with them.
   Audibility is determined via a masking curve.  Bits for mantissas are
   allocated from a global bit pool.

   E-AC-3 adds new coding tools, such as a longer filter bank, vector
   quantization, and spectral extension, to provide greater data
   efficiency and to operate at lower data rates than AC-3.  In the
   other direction, an expanded bit stream syntax and new frame
   constraints permit operation at higher data rates than AC-3.  The
   E-AC-3 syntax also allows a larger number of audio channels in one
   bit stream.  E-AC-3 operates at data rates from 32 kbps to 6.144 Mbps
   and at three sampling rates: 32 kHz, 44.1 kHz, and 48 kHz.

   E-AC-3 supports the carriage of multiple programs, and the carriage
   of programs with more than a baseline of 5.1 audio channels.  Both of
   these extensions beyond AC-3 are accomplished by time multiplexing
   additional data with baseline data.  In the case of multiple
   programs, frames with data for the programs are interleaved.  In the
   case of more than 5.1 channels, frames from substreams carrying the
   extra channels are interleaved with the independent substream which

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006                [Page 4]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

   carries a 5.1-channel compatible mix.  Both of these forms of
   multiplexing can occur in the same bit stream.  In other words,
   mixing multiple programs, some or all with more than 5.1 channels, is

   Additional channel capacity is enabled by adding substreams to a
   program.  One primary substream, called the "independent substream,"
   is required for each program.  This substream carries a self-
   contained mix of the audio, using a maximum of 5.1 channels, which
   makes its channel configuration compatible with AC-3.  Then,
   additional, optional substreams are used in the program to carry
   additional channels.  The data for each additional channel carries an
   indication of whether that channel provides data for an additional
   speaker location or replacement data for one of the speaker locations
   already defined by a previous substream.  For example, one common
   7.1-channel format uses 3 front channels and 4 surround channels.  It
   is packaged with a primary substream, which contains a 5.1 channel
   downmix of the 7.1-channel content, using left, center, right, left
   surround, right surround and low frequency effects channels.  One
   dependent substream supplies four channels: replacements for left
   surround and right surround, along with two additional surround
   channels (left back and right back.)

   The specification for E-AC-3 [ETSI] requires that all E-AC-3 decoders
   be capable of decoding at least a baseline portion of any E-AC-3 bit
   stream, which consists of the first independent substream of the
   first program, and of ignoring the other elements of the bit stream.
   This baseline is limited to 5.1 channels and a system is also able to
   convert to configurations with fewer channels for a presentation that
   matches its output capabilities, if needed.  More capable decoders
   can optionally choose among and mix multiple programs, and also
   decode configurations with more channels than the baseline by
   decoding dependent substreams.

2.1.  E-AC-3 Bit Stream

2.1.1.  Sync Frames and Audio Blocks

   The basic organizational building block in an E-AC-3 bit stream is
   the sync frame (also called a frame in this document.)  A sync frame
   contains the data necessary to decode time domain audio samples for
   one or more channels over a time of one or more audio blocks, so a
   frame is an Application Data Unit (ADU).  Each E-AC-3 frame contains
   a Sync Information (SI) field, a Bit Stream Information (BSI) field,
   an Audio Frame (AF) field, and up to six audio blocks (AB).  Each AB
   represents 256 PCM samples for each channel.  The frame ends with an
   optional auxiliary data field (AUX) and an error correction field
   (CRC).  Figure 1 shows the structure of an E-AC-3 frame, where N is

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006                [Page 5]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

   the number of blocks in the frame.

               +---+---+---+---------+- ... -+---------+---+---+
               |SI |BSI|AF |  AB(0)  |  ...  |  AB(N)  |AUX|CRC|
               +---+---+---+---------+- ... -+---------+---+---+

             Figure 1. E-AC-3 Frame Format with more than one block

   The SI field contains information needed to acquire and maintain
   codec synchronization.  The BSI field contains parameters that
   describe the coded audio service.  It carries an indication of the
   size of the frame in 16-bit words ('frmsiz', Section E.1.3 of [ETSI])
   and an indication of the sampling rate ('fscod').  It also carries an
   indication of the number of blocks in the frame ('numblkscod');
   permitted values are one, two, three, or six blocks.  The AF field
   contains information about coding tools that applies to the entire
   frame.  Each block has a duration of 256 samples, so a frame's
   duration is the corresponding multiple of 256 samples.  The time
   duration of the frame is also dependent on the sampling rate, as
   shown in Table 1.

       Table 1.  Time duration of E-AC-3 Frame (number of blocks vs.
                              sampling rate)

     | blocks per frame | 32 kHz |        44.1 kHz |          48 kHz |
     |                1 |   8 ms |  approx. 5.8 ms |  approx. 5.3 ms |
     |                2 |  16 ms | approx. 11.6 ms | approx. 10.7 ms |
     |                3 |  24 ms | approx. 17.4 ms |           16 ms |
     |                6 |  48 ms | approx. 34.8 ms |           32 ms |

   Each audio block contains header fields that indicate the use of
   various coding tools: block switching, dither, coupling, spectral
   extension and exponent strategy.  They also contain metadata,
   optionally used to enhance playback, such as dynamic range control.
   Finally, the exponents and bit allocation data needed to decode the
   mantissas into audio data, and the mantissas themselves, are
   included.  The format of audio blocks is described in detail in

2.1.2.  Programs and Substreams

   An E-AC-3 bit stream is logically arranged into programs.  A bit
   stream contains one or more programs, up to a maximum of eight.  When
   multiple programs are present in a bit stream, the frames that make
   them up are interleaved in time.

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006                [Page 6]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

       +----------+-     -+----------+----------+-     -+----------+-
       |Program(1)|  ...  |Program(N)|Program(1)|  ...  |Program(N)| ...
       | Frame 0  |       | Frame 0  | Frame 1  |       | Frame 1  |
       +----------+-     -+----------+----------+-     -+----------+-

     Figure 2. Interleaving of multiple programs in an E-AC-3 bit stream

   Each program contains one independent substream and optionally
   contains up to eight dependent substreams.  The independent substream
   carries a soundtrack of up to 5.1 channels, the multichannel format
   that matches the capabilities of AC-3, and can be meaningfully
   decoded and presented without any of the associated dependent
   substreams.  The dependent substreams are used to provide alternate
   channel data which enable different channel configurations, for
   example, to increase the number of channels beyond 5.1.  A frame of a
   dependent substream can decoded by itself, but its content can only
   be meaningfully presented in conjunction with the corresponding
   independent substream.  The type and identity of the substream to
   which a frame belongs can be determined from parameters in the
   frame's BSI (strmtyp and substreamid, in section E.1.3.1 of [ETSI]).
   When a program contains more than one substream, the frames belonging
   to those substreams are interleaved in time, and taken together, the
   frames of a program that correspond to the same time period, are
   called a 'program set'.  Figure 3 shows the interleaving of
   substreams for a single program.

       / --------- program set for frame 0 ------- \
       :                                           :
     +-------------+-------------+-   -+-------------+-------------+-
     |  Program(1) |  Program(1) |     |  Program(1) |  Program(1) |
     | Independent |  Dependent  | ... |  Dependent  | Independent | ...
     |  Substream  | Substream(0)|     | Substream(n)|  Substream  |
     |   Frame 0   |   Frame 0   |     |   Frame 0   |   Frame 1   |
     +-------------+-------------+-   -+-------------+-------------+-

     Figure 3. Interleaving of multiple substreams in an E-AC-3 program

2.1.3.  Frame Sets

   A further logical organization of the E-AC-3 bit stream is applied to
   facilitate conversion of E-AC-3 bit streams to AC-3 bit streams.  In
   this organization, the frames carrying six consecutive audio blocks
   are treated as group, called a 'frame set', regardless of the number
   of frames needed to carry six audio blocks.  This grouping extends
   across all programs and substreams which cover the time period of the
   six blocks.  Since E-AC-3 frames may carry one, two, three or six
   blocks, a frame set will consist of six, three, two, or one frames.
   AC-3 frames always carry six blocks, so the frame set provides

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006                [Page 7]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

   framing synchronization between an E-AC-3 bit stream and an AC-3 bit
   stream.  Metadata which indicates the alignment is carried in the
   first frame (which will be part of an independent substream) of each
   frame set in an E-AC-3 stream.  This first frame can be identified by
   a parameter in the BSI field of the bit stream: the Converter
   Synchronization flag (convsync, in section E. of [ETSI]) is
   set to true (1).

3.  RTP E-AC-3 Header Fields

   The RTP header is defined in the RTP Specification [RFC3550].  This
   section defines how a number of fields in the header are used.

   o  Payload Type (PT): The assignment of an RTP payload type for this
      packet format is outside the scope of this document; it is
      specified by the RTP profile under which this payload format is
      used, or signaled dynamically out-of-band (e.g., using SDP).

   o  Marker (M) bit: The M bit is set to one to indicate that the RTP
      packet payload contains at least one complete E-AC-3 frame or
      contains the final fragment of an E-AC-3 frame.

   o  Extension (X) bit: Defined by the RTP profile used.

   o  Timestamp: A 32-bit word that corresponds to the sampling instant
      for the first E-AC-3 frame in the RTP packet.  Packets containing
      fragments of the same frame MUST have the same time stamp.  The
      timestamp of the first RTP packet sent SHOULD be selected at
      random; thereafter it increases linearly according to the number
      of samples included in each frame.  Note that the number of
      samples in a frame depends on the number of blocks in the frame,
      with 256 samples in each block.  Also note that more than one
      frame might correspond to the same time period when multiple
      channel configurations or programs are present.  If these frames
      occupy multiple packets, it is possible that the resulting packets
      will have the same time stamp value.

4.  RTP E-AC-3 Payload Format

   This payload format is defined for E-AC-3, as defined in Annex E of
   [ETSI].  Note that E-AC-3 decoders are required to be capable of
   decoding AC-3 bit streams, so a receiver capable of receiving the
   E-AC-3 payload format defined in this document MUST also receive the
   payload format for AC-3 defined in [RFC4184].

   According to [RFC2736], RTP payload formats should contain an

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006                [Page 8]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

   integral number of application data units (ADUs).  The E-AC-3 frame
   corresponds to an ADU in the context of this payload format.  Each
   RTP payload MUST start with the two-byte payload specific header
   followed by an integral number of complete E-AC-3 frames, or a single
   fragment of an E-AC-3 frame.

   If an E-AC-3 frame exceeds the MTU for a network, it SHOULD be
   fragmented for transmission within an RTP packet.  Section 4.2
   provides guidelines for creating frame fragments.

4.1.  Payload Specific Header

   There is a two-octet Payload Header at the beginning of each payload.
   Each E-AC-3 RTP payload MUST begin with the following payload header.

                     0                   1
                     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
                    |    MBZ      |F|       NF      |

                     Figure 4. E-AC-3 RTP Payload Header

   o  Must Be Zero (MBZ): Bits marked MBZ SHALL be set to the value zero
      and SHALL be ignored by receivers.  The bits are reserved for
      future extensions.

   o  Frame Type (F): This one-bit field indicates the type of frame(s)
      present in the payload.  It takes the following values:
         0 - One or more complete frames.
         1 - Fragment of frame.  (Note that the M bit in the RTP header
         is set for the final fragment.)

   o  Number of frames/fragments(NF): An 8-bit field whose meaning
      depends on the Frame Type (F) in this payload.  For complete
      frames (F of 0), it is used to indicate the number of E-AC-3
      frames in the RTP payload.  For frame fragments (F of 1), it is
      used to indicate the number of fragments (and therefore packets)
      that make up the current frame.  NF MUST be identical for packets
      containing fragments of the same frame.

   When receiving E-AC-3 payloads with F = 0 and more than a single
   frame (NF > 1), a receiver needs to use the "frmsiz" field in the BSI
   header in each E-AC-3 frame to determine the frame's length if the
   receiver needs to determine the boundary of the next frame.  Note
   that the frame length varies from frame to frame in some

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006                [Page 9]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

4.2.  Fragmentation of E-AC-3 Frames

   The size of an E-AC-3 frame is signaled in the Frame Size (frmsiz)
   field in a frame's BSI header.  The value of this field is one less
   than the number of 16-bit words in the frame.  If the size of an
   E-AC-3 frame exceeds the MTU size, the frame SHOULD be fragmented at
   the RTP level.  The fragmentation MAY be performed at any byte
   boundary in the frame.  RTP packets containing fragments of the same
   E-AC-3 frame SHALL be sent in consecutive order, from first to last
   fragment.  This enables a receiver to assemble the fragments in the
   correct order.

4.3.  Concatenation of E-AC-3 Frames

   There are cases where E-AC-3 frame sizes are smaller than the MTU
   size and it is advantageous to include multiple frames in a packet.
   It is useful to take into account the logical arrangement of the bit
   stream into program sets and frame sets to constrain the effects of
   the loss of a packet.  It is desirable for a complete program set or
   a complete frame set to be included in one packet.  Also, it is
   undesirable for frames from more than one program set or frame set to
   be in the same packet, unless the sets are complete.  In this way,
   the loss of a packet is kept from causing the contents of another
   packet to be unusable.

   Frames from more than one program set SHOULD NOT be included in the
   same packet unless all program sets in the packet are complete.
   Frames from more than one frame set SHOULD NOT be included in the
   same packet unless all frame sets in the packet are complete.

4.4.  Carriage of AC-3 Frames

   The E-AC-3 specification [ETSI] requires that E-AC-3 decoders be
   capable of decoding AC-3 frames.  That specification also supports
   carriage of AC-3 frames in an E-AC-3 bit stream.  Due to differences
   between E-AC-3 and AC-3 frames, there are restrictions placed on the
   use of AC-3 frames: they are only used for the independent substream
   of the first (or only) program in an E-AC-3 bit stream.  Note that
   carriage of: only E-AC-3 frames, only AC-3 frames, a mixture of
   E-AC-3 and AC-3 frames are all legal configurations.  It is legal to
   change among the configurations in a bit stream.  The AC-3 frame
   format is described in [RFC4184] and specified in [ETSI]

5.  Types and Names

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006               [Page 10]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

5.1.  Media Type Registration

   This registration uses the template defined in [RFC4288] and follows

   To: ietf-types@iana.org
   Subject: Registration of media type audio/eac3

   Type name: audio

   Subtype name: eac3

   Required parameter:

   o  rate: The RTP timestamp clock rate which is equal to the audio
      sampling rate.  Permitted rates are 32000, 44100, and 48000.

   Optional parameter:

   o  bitStreamConfig: The configuration of programs and substreams in
      the bit stream, expressed as a sequence of ASCII characters.  This
      parameter can serve two purposes.  During the creation of a
      session, the bitStreamConfig parameter might be used to negotiate
      a match between the requirements of a bit stream and the
      capabilities of a receiver to avoid using network bandwidth for
      data that can't be used.  Second, it makes the configuration of
      the bit stream explicit to the receiver so that whenever a packet
      is lost, the receiver can identify which kind of frame(s) has been
      lost to aid error mitigation.

      The format for the value for this parameter is to represent each
      substream of the bit stream by a single character indicating its
      type, immediately followed by the number of audio channels
      resulting if a frame of that substream (plus any other required
      substreams) is decoded.  Note that even though LFE channels are
      often described as "fractional" channels (e.g., the ".1" in 5.1),
      for this parameter, an LFE channel is counted as one (e.g., a 5.1-
      channel configuration is indicated as 6.)  The configuration of
      the bit stream MUST match the value of this parameter for the
      duration of the session.

      Allowed values for the substream type are:
               i - Independent substream.
               d - Dependent substream.

      The E-AC-3 specification [ETSI] defines which configurations of
      bit streams are legal, which constrains the values the
      bitStreamConfig parameter will take.  Each program starts with,

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006               [Page 11]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

      and contains exactly one, independent substream ('i').  Each
      independent substream is followed by between 0 and 8 dependent
      substreams ('d'), which belong to the same program.  See
      Section 2.1.2 for more discussion of programs and substreams.

      For example, consider a bit stream containing two programs:
      *  the first program with
         +  a six-channel independent substream
         +  a dependent substream containing the additional channels
            needed for eight channels
         +  a second dependent substream containing the further channels
            needed for 14 channels
      *  along with a second program with
         +  another six-channel independent substream
         +  a dependent substream containing the additional channels
            needed for eight channels
      Then the configuration of the bit stream is indicated as:

               bitStreamConfig = i6d8d14i6d8

      When the bitStreamConfig parameter is being used in an offer/
      answer exchange, zero (0) for the number of channels for a
      substream in an answer is used to indicate a substream that the
      answerer desires to not receive.

   Encoding considerations:

      This media type is framed and contains binary data.

   Security considerations:

      See Section 6 of RFC XXXX.

   Interoperability considerations:

      To maintain interoperability with AC-3-capable end-points, in
      cases where negotiation is possible, an E-AC-3 end-point SHOULD
      declare itself also as AC-3 capable (i.e., supporting also "audio/
      ac3" as specified in RFC 4184 [RFC4184]).  Note that all E-AC-3
      end-points are required to be AC-3 capable.

   Published specification:

      RFC XXXX and ETSI TS 102.366 [ETSI].

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006               [Page 12]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

   Applications that use this media type:

      Multichannel audio compression of audio, and audio for video.

   Additional Information:

      Magic number(s):
         The first two octets of an E-AC-3 frame are always the
         synchronization word, which has the hex value 0x0B77.

   Person & email address to contact for further information:

      Brian Link <bdl@dolby.com>
      IETF AVT working group.

   Intended Usage:


   Restrictions on usage:

      This media type depends on RTP framing, and hence is only defined
      for transfer via RTP [RFC3550].  Transport within other framing
      protocols is not defined at this time.

   Author/Change controller:

      IETF Audio/Video Transport Working Group delegated from the IESG.

5.2.  SDP Usage

   The information carried in the media type specification has a
   specific mapping to fields in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
   [RFC2327], which is commonly used to describe RTP sessions.  When SDP
   is used to specify sessions employing E-AC-3, the mapping is as

   o  The Media type ("audio") goes in SDP "m=" as the media name.

   o  The Media subtype ("eac3") goes in SDP "a=rtpmap" as the encoding

   o  The required parameter "rate" also goes in "a=rtpmap" as the clock
      rate.  (The optional "channels" rtpmap encoding parameter is not
      used.  Instead, the information is included in the optional
      parameter bitStreamConfig.)

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006               [Page 13]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

   o  The optional parameter "bitStreamConfig" goes in the SDP "a=fmtp"

   An example of the SDP data for E-AC-3:

            m=audio 49111 RTP/AVP 100
            a=rtpmap:100 eac3/48000
            a=fmtp:100 bitStreamConfig i6d8d14i6d8

   Certain considerations are needed when SDP is used to perform offer/
   answer exchanges [RFC3264].

   o  The "rate" is a symmetric parameter, and the answer MUST use the
      same value or the answerer removes the payload type.

   o  The "bitStreamConfig" parameter is declarative and indicates, for
      sendonly, the intended arrangement of substreams in the bit
      stream, along with the channel configuration, to transmit, and for
      recvonly or sendrecv, the desired bit stream arrangement and
      channel configuration to receive.  The format of the
      bitStreamConfig value in an answer MAY differ from the offer value
      by replacing the number of channels for any undesired substreams
      with '0'.  It is valid to zero out dependent substreams containing
      undesired channel configurations and to zero out all the
      substreams of an undesired program.  Then the sender MAY reoffer
      the stream in the receiver's preferred configuration if it is
      capable of providing that configuration.  Note that all receivers
      are capable of receiving, and all decoders are capable of
      decoding, any of the legal bit stream configurations, so the
      parameter exchange is not needed for interoperability.  The
      parameter exchange might be used to help optimize the transmission
      to the number of programs or channels the receiver requests.

   o  Since an AC-3 bit stream is a special case of an E-AC-3 bit
      stream, it is permissible for an AC-3 bit stream to be carried in
      the E-AC-3 payload format.  To ensure interoperability with
      receivers which support the AC-3 payload format, but not the
      E-AC-3 payload format, a sender which desires to send an AC-3 bit
      stream in the E-AC-3 payload format SHOULD also offer the session
      in the AC-3 payload format by including payload types for both
      media sub-types: 'ac3' and 'eac3'.

6.  Security Considerations

   The payload format described in this document is subject to the
   security considerations defined in RTP [RFC3550] and in any
   applicable RTP profile (e.g.  [RFC3551]).  To protect the user's

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006               [Page 14]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

   privacy and any copyrighted material, confidentiality protection
   would have to be applied.  To also protect against modification by
   intermediate entities and ensure the authenticity of the stream,
   integrity protection and authentication would be required.
   Confidentiality, integrity protection, and authentication have to be
   solved by a mechanism external to this payload format, e.g., SRTP

   The E-AC-3 format is designed so that the validity of data frames can
   be determined by decoders.  The required decoder response to a
   malformed frame is to discard the malformed data and conceal the
   errors in the audio output until a valid frame is detected and
   decoded.  This is expected to prevent crashes and other abnormal
   decoder behavior in response to errors or attacks.

7.  Congestion Control

   The general congestion control considerations for transporting RTP
   data apply to E-AC-3 audio over RTP as well, see RTP [RFC3550], and
   any applicable RTP profile (e.g., [RFC3551]).

   E-AC-3 encoders may use a range of bit rates to encode audio data, so
   it is possible to adapt network bandwidth by adjusting the encoder
   bit rate in real time or by having multiple copies of content encoded
   at different bit rates.  Additionally, packing more frames in each
   RTP payload can reduce the number of packets sent and hence the
   overhead from IP/UDP/RTP headers, at the expense of increased delay
   and reduced error robustness against packet losses.

8.  IANA Considerations

   Registration of a new media subtype for E-AC-3 is requested (see
   Section 5.)

9.  References

9.1.  Normative References

   [ETSI]     ETSI, "Digital Audio Compression (AC-3, Enhanced AC-3)
              Standard", TS 102 366, February 2005.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC4184]  Link, B., Hager, T., and J. Flaks, "RTP Payload Format for

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006               [Page 15]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

              AC-3 Audio", RFC 4184, October 2005.

   [RFC3550]  Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V.
              Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time
              Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, July 2003.

   [RFC4288]  Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type Specifications and
              Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 4288, December 2005.

   [RFC3555]  Casner, S. and P. Hoschka, "MIME Type Registration of RTP
              Payload Formats", RFC 3555, July 2003.

   [RFC2327]  Handley, M. and V. Jacobson, "SDP: Session Description
              Protocol", RFC 2327, April 1998.

   [RFC3264]  Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer Model
              with Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 3264,
              June 2002.

9.2.  Informative References

   [2004AES]  Fielder, L., Andersen, R., Crockett, B., Davidson, G.,
              Davis, M., Turner, S., Vinton, M., and P. Williams,
              "Introduction to Dolby Digital Plus, an Enhancement to the
              Dolby Digital Coding System", Preprint 6196, Presented at
              the 117th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society,
              October 2004.

   [1994AES]  Todd, C., Davidson, G., Davis, M., Fielder, L., Link, B.,
              and S. Vernon, "AC-3: Flexible Perceptual Coding for Audio
              Transmission and Storage", Preprint 3796, Presented at the
              96th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society,
              May 1994.

   [RFC2736]  Handley, M. and C. Perkins, "Guidelines for Writers of RTP
              Payload Format Specifications", BCP 36, RFC 2736,
              December 1999.

   [RFC3551]  Schulzrinne, H. and S. Casner, "RTP Profile for Audio and
              Video Conferences with Minimal Control", STD 65, RFC 3551,
              July 2003.

   [RFC3711]  Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K.
              Norrman, "The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)",
              RFC 3711, March 2004.

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006               [Page 16]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

Author's Address

   Brian Link
   Dolby Laboratories
   100 Potrero Ave.
   San Francisco, CA  94103

   Phone: +1 415 558 0200
   Email: bdl@dolby.com

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006               [Page 17]

Internet-Draft     RTP Payload Format for E-AC-3 Audio        April 2006

Intellectual Property Statement

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at

Disclaimer of Validity

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an

Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).  This document is subject
   to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
   except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.


   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.

Link                    Expires October 21, 2006               [Page 18]

Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.107, available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/