[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: (draft-gellens-lemonade-mms-mapping) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 RFC 4356

Internet Draft: Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail         R. Gellens
Document: draft-ietf-lemonade-mms-mapping-05.txt                Qualcomm
Expires: March 2006                                       September 2005


         Mapping Between the Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS)
                           and Internet Mail


Status of this Memo

    By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
    applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
    have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
    aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

    Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
    Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
    other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
    Drafts.

    Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
    months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
    at any time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as
    reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

    The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
    http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt The list of
    Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
    http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.


Copyright Notice

    Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).  All Rights Reserved.


Abstract

    The cellular telephone industry has defined a service known as the
    Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS).  This service uses formats and
    protocols which are similar to, but differ in key ways from, those
    used in Internet mail.






Gellens                   [Page 1]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    One important difference between MMS and Internet Mail is that MMS
    uses headers which start with "X-Mms-" to carry a variety of user
    agent and server related information elements.

    This document specifies how to exchange messages between these two
    services, including mapping information elements as used in MMS
    X-Mms-* headers as well as delivery and disposition reports, to and
    from that used in SMTP and Internet message headers.











































Gellens                   [Page 2]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


Table of Contents

    1  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
      1.1  Conventions Used in this Document . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
      1.2  Scope  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
      1.3  Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
      1.4  Abbreviations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
      1.5  Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
    2  Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail  . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
      2.1  Mapping Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
        2.1.1  MMS to Internet Mail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
        2.1.2  Internet Mail to MMS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
        2.1.3  MMS Information Element Mappings . . . . . . . . . . .  7
          2.1.3.1  Table 1: MM3 Mappings . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
          2.1.3.2  Conversion of messages from MMS to Internet format 10
            2.1.3.2.1  Table 2: Importance Mappings (MMS to Internet  13
            2.1.3.2.2  Table 3: X-Priority Mappings (MMS to Internet  14
          2.1.3.3  Conversion of messages from Internet to MMS format 16
            2.1.3.3.1  Table 4: Priority Mappings (Internet Message t 18
        2.1.4  Report Generation and Conversion  . . . . . . . . . .  19
          2.1.4.1  Delivery Report Mapping from MMS to Internet Messa 20
            2.1.4.1.1  Table 5: Delivery Report Mappings (MMS to Inte 20
          2.1.4.2  Delivery Report Mapping from Internet Message to M 21
            2.1.4.2.1  Table 6: Delivery Report Mappings (Internet Me 22
          2.1.4.3  Read Report Mapping from MMS to Internet Message . 23
            2.1.4.3.1  Table 7: Read Report Mappings (MMS to Internet 24
          2.1.4.4  Disposition Report Mapping from Internet Message t 25
            2.1.4.4.1  Table 8: Disposition Report Mappings (Internet 25
        2.1.5  Message Delivery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
    3  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  26
    4  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
    5  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  27
    6  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
    7  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  28
    8  Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
      Appendix A: Changes Since Last Version . . . . . . . . . . . .  30
      Intellectual Property Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
      Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  31


1 Introduction

1.1 Conventions Used in this Document

    The key words "REQUIRED", "MUST", "MUST NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD
    NOT", and "MAY" in this document are to be interpreted as described
    in "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels"
    [KEYWORDS].



Gellens                   [Page 3]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


1.2 Scope

    This document describes how to exchange messages between MMS systems
    (as defined by 3GPP/3GPP2/OMA) and Internet mail systems (that is,
    [SMTP] and [Msg-Fmt]).  This includes the translation of message
    formats, message header elements, message delivery reports and
    message disposition reports ([DSN-Msg] and [MDN]).

    The MMS architecture [Stage_2] and specifications [Stage_3] refer to
    interfaces as reference points named MMx.  For example, MM1 is the
    client-server interface, MM4 is the server-server interface, and MM3
    is an interface to "external" or non-MMS systems.  The specification
    in this document can be used for message exchange between any system
    which uses Internet Message formats and protocols and an MMS system;
    from the perspective of the MMS system, reference point MM3 is used.

    This document includes support for voice messages specified by the
    Voice Profile for Internet Mail [VPIM].  The VPIM specification
    allows voice messages to be exchanged between voice mail systems
    using Internet mail format [Msg-Fmt] and transported via [SMTP].
    Thus, the MMS MM3 interface supports the ability to exchange voice
    messages between an MMS system and a voice mail system.  Note that
    such use is distinct from voice media being part of a user-composed
    multimedia message.

    Note that MM3 can also be used for interworking with "external"
    (non-MMS) systems other than Internet mail, such as Short Messaging
    Service (SMS) and access to external mail stores (such as a voice
    mail system).  This specification does not address these other uses
    or sub-interfaces of MM3; it is only concerned with Internet mail
    interworking and specifically exchange of messages.

    All MM3 Stage 2 [Stage_2] functions are supported except for reply
    charging and sender address hiding.


1.3 Definitions

    --------------------|----------------------------------------------
    Body                |The portion of an [SMTP] message's Content
                        |following the Header (that is, following the
                        |first blank line).  The Body may contain
                        |structured parts and sub-parts, each of which
                        |may have their own Header and Body.  The Body
                        |contains information intended for the message
                        |recipient (human or software).
    --------------------|----------------------------------------------
    Content             |The portion of an SMTP message that is
                        |delivered.  The Content consists of a Header


Gellens                   [Page 4]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


                        |and a Body.
    --------------------|----------------------------------------------
    Disposition Report  |Feedback information to an originator User
                        |Agent by a recipient User  Agent about
    Message Disposition |handling of an original message.  This may
       Notification     |include notification that the message was or
                        |was not read, was deleted unread, etc.
    --------------------|----------------------------------------------
    Envelope            |The portion of an SMTP message not included in
                        |the Content; that is, not in the Header nor in
                        |the Body.  Envelope information only exists
                        |while the message is in transit, and contains
                        |information used by SMTP agents (MTAs).
    --------------------|----------------------------------------------
    Header              |The first part of an SMTP message's Content.
                        |The Header is separated from the Body by a
                        |blank line.  The Header consists of Fields
                        |(such as "To:"), also known as Header Fields
                        |or Headers.  The message Header contains
                        |information used by User Agents.
    --------------------|----------------------------------------------
    Gateway             |See [SMTP], Section 2.3.8.
    --------------------|----------------------------------------------
    User Agent          |An MMS or Email user agent
    --------------------|----------------------------------------------


























Gellens                   [Page 5]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


1.4 Abbreviations

    --------|----------------------------------------------------------
    MSA     |Message Submission Agent.  A server which accepts messages
            |from User Agents and processes them; either delivering
            |them locally or relaying to an MTA.
    --------|----------------------------------------------------------
    MTA     |Mail Transfer Agent.  A server which implements [SMTP].
    --------|----------------------------------------------------------


1.5 Assumptions

    It is assumed that the reader is already familiar with the contents
    of the 3GPP2 MMS Specification Overview [Overview], MMS Stage 1
    (requirements) [Stage_1] and Stage 2 (architecture and abstract
    messages) [Stage_2], and 3GPP/3GPP2 Stage 3 (protocols) [Stage_3]
    documents.  It is also assumed that the reader is familiar with
    Internet mail, especially RFC 2821 [SMTP] and RFC 2822 [Msg-Fmt].


2 Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail

    This section defines the interworking between MMS Relay/Servers and
    External Servers using native [SMTP].  That is, information elements
    are exchanged using standard Internet Message [Msg-Fmt] header
    fields and standard [SMTP] elements.

    SMTP and Internet mail extensions are used for features such as
    delivery reports, message expiration, discovery of server support
    for optional features, etc.


2.1 Mapping Specification

2.1.1 MMS to Internet Mail

    When sending a message to an Internet mail system the MMS
    Relay/Server MUST convert the MM if required, and MUST comply with
    the requirements of [SMTP].

    The MMS Relay/Server SHOULD use the information elements associated
    with the MM to define the control information (Internet Message
    header fields and SMTP envelope values) needed for the transfer
    protocol.






Gellens                   [Page 6]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    Section 2.1.3 lists the mappings between X-Mms-* headers and
    Internet Message header fields and SMTP values.

    Delivery and read report MMs SHOULD be converted to standard
    Internet Message report format (multipart/report).  In addition to
    converting Internet Message reports, the MMS Relay/Server MUST
    generate delivery and read report MMs for received messages as
    appropriate.  See section 2.1.4 for more information.


2.1.2 Internet Mail to MMS

    When receiving a message from an Internet mail system the MMS
    Relay/Server MAY convert incoming messages to the MM format used
    within the receiving system.

    The MMS Relay/Server MAY convert control information received from
    the Internet mail server into appropriate information elements of an
    MM.

    Section 2.1.3 lists the mappings between X-Mms-* headers and
    Internet Message header fields and SMTP values.

    Standard Internet Message report format (multipart/report) messages
    MAY be converted to delivery or read report MMs, as appropriate.  In
    addition to converting report MMs, implementations conforming to
    this document MUST generate standard Internet Message delivery and
    disposition reports for received Internet messages as appropriate.
    See section 2.1.4 for more information.






















Gellens                   [Page 7]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


2.1.3 MMS Information Element Mappings

    The mappings between MMS elements and SMTP/Internet Message elements
    (either [SMTP] parameters, [Msg-Fmt] headers, or both) are
    summarized in the table below, and detailed in subsequent sections.
    The "MMS Headers" are from [OMA-MMS].  Note that only information
    elements which need to be mapped are listed. [Msg-Fmt] headers not
    listed here SHOULD be passed unaltered

2.1.3.1 Table 1:  MM3 Mappings

    =================|=================|================|==============
    Information Elem |[SMTP] Element   |[Msg-Fmt] Header|MMS Header
    =================|=================|================|==============
    3GPP MMS Version |N/A              |N/A             |X-Mms-3GPP-MMS
                     |                 |                |   -Version:
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Message Type     |N/A              |N/A             |X-Mms-Message-
    (of PDU)         |                 |                |   Type:
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Transaction ID   |N/A              |N/A             |X-Mms-Transact
                     |                 |                |   ion-Id:
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Message ID       |ENVID [DSN-SMTP] |Message-ID:     |Message-ID:
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Recipient        |RCPT TO          |To:, Cc:, or    |To:, Cc:, Bcc:
    address(es)      |address(es)      |omitted (Bcc)   |
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Sender's address |MAIL FROM        |From:           |From:
                     |address if       |                |
                     |user-originated; |                |
                     |MUST set MAIL    |                |
                     |FROM to null     |                |
                     |("<>") for all   |                |
                     |automatically-   |                |
                     |generated MMs    |                |
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Content type     |N/A              |Content-Type:   |Content-type:
                     |                 |                |
                     |                 |For voice mes-  |
                     |                 |sages compliant |
                     |                 |to [VPIM], see  |
                     |                 |Note 2          |
    =================|=================|================|==============







Gellens                   [Page 8]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    =================|=================|================|==============
    Information Elem |[SMTP] Element   |[Msg-Fmt] Header|MMS Header
    =================|=================|================|==============
    Message class    |Class=auto:      |MAY set 'Prece  |X-Mms-Message-
                     |MUST set MAIL    |   dence: bulk' |   Class:
                     |FROM to null     |on class=auto   |
                     |("<>").          |                |
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Date and time    |N/A              |Date:           |Date:
    of submission    |                 |                |
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Time of expiry   |DELIVER-BY       |N/A             |X-Mms-Expiry:
                     |[Deliver-By]     |                |
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Earliest deliv-  |(only for submis-|N/A             |X-Mms-Delivery
    ery time         |sion; not relay) |                |   -Time:
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Delivery report  |DSN [DSN-SMTP]   |N/A             |X-Mms-Delivery
    request          |SHOULD also      |                |   -Report:
                     |specify recip-   |                |
                     |ient address as  |                |
                     |ORCPT; SHOULD    |                |
                     |also specify     |                |
                     |ENVID            |                |
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Importance (a/k/a|N/A              |Importance:     |X-Mms-
    "priority")      |                 |                |   Priority:
                     |                 |                |
                     |                 |                |
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Sender visib-    |(not currently   |(not currently  |X-Mms-Sender-
    ility            |supported)       |supported)      |   Visibility:
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Read reply       |N/A              |Disposition-    |X-Mms-Read-
    request          |                 |   Notification |   Reply:
                     |                 |   -To: [MDN]   |
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Reply-charging   |(not currently   |(not currently  |X-Mms-Reply-
    permission       |supported)       |supported)      |   Charging:
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Reply-charging   |(not currently   |(not currently  |X-Mms-Reply-
    permission       |supported)       |supported)      |   Charging-
    deadline         |                 |                |   Deadline:
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Reply-charging   |(not currently   |(not currently  |X-Mms-Reply-
    permission       |supported)       |supported)      |   Charging-
    limitation       |                 |                |   Size:
    =================|=================|================|==============



Gellens                   [Page 9]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    =================|=================|================|==============
    Information Elem |[SMTP] Element   |[Msg-Fmt] Header|MMS Header
    =================|=================|================|==============
    Reply-charging   |(not currently   |(not currently  |X-Mms-Reply-
    usage request    |supported)       |supported)      |   Charging-
                     |                 |                |   Id:
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Reply-charging   |(not currently   |(not currently  |X-Mms-Reply-
    usage reference  |supported)       |supported)      |   Charging:
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Subject          |N/A              |Subject:        |Subject:
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Previously-sent- |N/A              |Resent-From:    |X-Mms-Previous
    by               |                 |                |   ly-Sent-By:
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Previously-sent- |N/A              |Resent-Date:    |X-Mms-
    date and-time    |                 |                |   Previously-
                     |                 |                |   Sent-Date:
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Hop/host trace   |N/A              |Received:       |(Not sup-
                     |                 |                |ported)
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Sensitivity      |N/A              |Sensitivity: see|N/A
                     |                 |Note 1          |
    _________________|_________________|________________|______________
    Content          |N/A              |<message body>  |<message body>
    =================|=================|================|==============

    Note 1:  The [VPIM] 'Sensitivity' header element indicates the
    privacy requested by the message originator (values are "personal"
    or "private"); per [VPIM], a message recipient MUST NOT forward a
    message with a 'Sensitivity' header.  Since sensitivity is not an
    MMS feature, any messages which contain a 'Sensitivity:' header
    SHOULD NOT be sent to an MMS system.

    Note 2: [VPIM] specifies how conforming messages are identified.


2.1.3.2 Conversion of messages from MMS to Internet format

    3GPP MMS Version

    The 'X-Mms-3GPP-MMS-Version:' header, if present, SHOULD be removed.

    Message Type (of PDU)






Gellens                   [Page 10]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    The 'X-Mms-Message-Type:' header, if present, SHOULD be removed.

    Transaction ID

    The 'X-Mms-Transaction-Id:' header, if present, SHOULD be removed.

    Message ID

    The 'Message-Id:' header MUST be retained.  If not present it MUST
    be created, with a unique value, per [Msg-Fmt].

    The message ID SHOULD be transmitted in the [SMTP] envelope as the
    ENVID parameter, as specified in [DSN-SMTP].

    To facilitate the case where an MMS message traverses the Internet
    prior to returning to an MMS system, implementations might wish to
    retain the 'X-Mms-Message-Id:' header.  Such systems should be aware
    that headers which begin with "X-" might be removed during transit
    through Internet MTAs.

    Recipient(s) address

    The address of each recipient MUST be transmitted in the [SMTP]
    envelope as a RCPT TO value.  All disclosed recipients SHOULD also
    appear in a 'To:' or 'Cc:' header.  At least one 'To:', 'Cc:', or
    'Bcc:' header MUST be present.  If all recipients are undisclosed, a
    'To:' header SHOULD be created using empty group syntax whose name
    gives an indication to a human reader, for example 'To:
    undisclosed-recipients:;'.

    The 'To:' header SHOULD NOT appear more than once.  The 'Cc:' header
    SHOULD NOT appear more than once.

    Each recipient address MUST obey the length restrictions per [SMTP].

    Current Internet message format requires that only 7-bit US-ASCII
    characters be present in addresses.  Other characters (for example,
    non-7-bit characters in a phrase part of an address header) MUST be
    encoded according to [Hdr-Enc].

    All recipient addresses in the [SMTP] envelope must be
    fully-qualified in accordance with [SMTP].  In particular, messages
    MUST NOT be sent to an Internet mail system with an E.164 numbers
    instead of a fully-qualified domain name.

    All addresses in 'To:', 'Cc:', and 'Bcc:' headers SHOULD be in the
    form of fully-qualified domains.  Unqualified E.164 numbers SHOULD
    NOT be used.



Gellens                   [Page 11]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    Sender address

    The address of the message sender SHOULD appear in the 'From:'
    header.

    The address of the message sender for all user-generated messages
    ('X-Mms-Message-Class:  Personal') SHOULD be transmitted in the
    [SMTP] envelope as the MAIL FROM value.

    The return addresses in the [SMTP] envelope must be fully-qualified
    in accordance with [SMTP].  In particular, messages MUST NOT be sent
    to an Internet mail system with an E.164 numbers instead of a
    fully-qualified domain name.

    The address(es) in the 'From:' header SHOULD be in the form of
    fully-qualified domains.  Unqualified E.164 numbers SHOULD NOT be
    used.

    Because of the risk of mail loops, it is critical that the MAIL FROM
    be set to null ("<>") for all automatically-generated MMs (such as
    'X-Mms-Message-Class:  Auto').  The MAIL FROM value MUST be set to
    null for all automatically-generated messages.  This includes
    reports, "out-of-office" replies, etc.

    Current Internet message format requires that only 7-bit US-ASCII
    characters be present in addresses.  Other characters (for example,
    non-7-bit characters in a phrase part of an address header) MUST be
    encoded according to [Hdr-Enc].  Note that it would be possible to
    define an [SMTP] extension to permit transmission of unencoded 8-bit
    characters, but in the absence of such an extension [Hdr-Enc] MUST
    be used.

    The sender address MUST obey the length restrictions of [SMTP].

    Content type

    The 'Content-Type:' header SHOULD be preserved.

    Message class

    The 'X-Mms-Message-Class:' header MAY be retained in order to
    provide information on the source of the message.  A 'Precedence:
    bulk' header MAY be inserted for class=auto or class=advertisement.
    See 'Sender Address' above. (Class=personal and class=informational
    do not require special handling.)






Gellens                   [Page 12]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    Time of Expiry

    The 'X-Mms-Expiry:' header, if present, SHOULD be removed.

    The remaining time until the message is considered expired SHOULD be
    transmitted in the [SMTP] envelope by using the DELIVER-BY
    extension, as specified in [Deliver-By].

    Note that the [SMTP] DELIVER-BY extension carries time remaining
    until expiration; each server decrements the value by the amount of
    time it has possessed the message.  The 'X-Mms-Expiry:' header may
    contain either the absolute time at which the message is considered
    expired or the relative time until the message is considered
    expired.

    Earliest delivery time

    The 'X-Mms-Delivery-Time:' header, if present, SHOULD be removed.

    Future delivery is a message submission, not message relay feature.

    Delivery report request

    Requests for delivery status notifications (DSNs) SHOULD be
    transmitted in the [SMTP] envelope by using the DSN extension as
    specified in [DSN-SMTP] to request "success" or "none" notification
    (depending on the value of the 'X-Mms-Delivery-Report' header).
    When the NOTIFY extension is used, the unaltered recipient address
    SHOULD be transmitted as the ORCPT value, and the original message
    ID SHOULD be transmitted as the ENVID value.

    The 'X-Mms-Delivery-Report:' header, if present, SHOULD be removed.

    Importance

    The message sender's importance value (also called "priority",
    although this can be confused with class-of-service values) SHOULD
    be transmitted using an 'Importance:' header.

    Suggested mappings:

2.1.3.2.1 Table 2:  Importance Mappings (MMS to Internet Message)

        ---------------------------|------------------
        'X-Mms-Priority: High'     |'Importance: High'
        ---------------------------|------------------
        'X-Mms-Priority: Normal'   |[omit]
        ---------------------------|------------------
        'X-Mms-Priority: Low'      |'Importance: Low'


Gellens                   [Page 13]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


        ---------------------------|------------------

    Normal priority messages should omit the 'Importance:' header.

2.1.3.2.2 Table 3:  X-Priority Mappings (MMS to Internet Message)

        ---------------------------|----------------------
        'X-Mms-Priority: High'     |'X-Priority: 2 (high)'
        ---------------------------|----------------------
        'X-Mms-Priority: Normal    |[omit]
        ---------------------------|----------------------
        'X-Mms-Priority: Low       |'X-Priority: 4 (low)'
        ---------------------------|----------------------

    Normal priority messages SHOULD omit the 'X-Priority:' header.

    The 'X-Mms-Priority:' header, if present, SHOULD be removed.

    Sender visibility

    Support for sender address hiding is not currently supported.

    The 'X-Mms-Sender-Visibility:' header, if present, SHOULD be
    removed.

    Read reply request

    A request for a read reply SHOULD be transmitted using a
    'Disposition-Notification-To:' header as specified in [MDN].

    The 'X-Mms-Read-Reply:' header, if present, SHOULD be removed.

    Reply-charging

    Reply charging permission and acceptance are complex issues
    requiring both user agent and server support.  Misapplied reply
    charging may cause incorrect billing.  Until the security issues
    have been properly addressed, reply charging SHOULD NOT be honored
    when using this interface.

    The 'X-Mms-Reply-Charging:', 'X-Mms-Reply-Charging-Deadline:',
    'X-Mms-Reply-Charging-Size:', and 'X-Mms-Reply-Charging-Id:' headers
    MAY be removed.  Messages containing a reply-charging usage request
    ('X-Mms-Reply-Charging-Id:' and 'X-Mms-Reply-Charging: accepted' or
    'X-Mms-Reply-Charging: accepted (text only)' headers) SHOULD be
    rejected.





Gellens                   [Page 14]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    Subject

    The 'Subject:' header MUST be preserved.  Current Internet message
    format requires that only 7-bit US-ASCII characters be present.
    Other characters must be encoded according to [Hdr-Enc].  Note that
    it is possible for an [SMTP] extension to be defined which would
    permit transmission of unencoded 8-bit characters, but in the
    absence of such an extension [Hdr-Enc] must be used.

    Resending

    A message may be resent to one or more new recipients; it may be
    resent more than once; each time new 'Resent-' headers SHOULD be
    added at the top of the message.  Thus, if more than one series of
    'Resent-' headers are present, the original series is the last; the
    most recent is the first.

    Forward counter

    The 'Resent-Count:' header is NOT RECOMMENDED.  Loop control is
    usually done by counting 'Received' headers, which are more general
    than 'Resent-' headers.

    Previously-sent Information

    A 'Resent-From:' header MAY be added to indicate the address of the
    user who directed the message to be resent.

    A 'Resent-Date:' header SHOULD be added to indicate the time and
    date that the message was resent.

    Any 'X-Mms-Previously-Sent-By:' and 'X-Mms-Previously-Sent-Date'
    headers, if present, SHOULD be removed.  The information contained
    in them SHOULD be translated into 'From:', 'Resent-To:',
    'Resent-From:', and 'Resent-Date:' headers.  The original sender of
    the message SHOULD appear in the 'From:' header; the original
    recipient(s) SHOULD appear in the 'To:' header; the time and date
    the message was originally sent SHOULD appear in the 'Date:' header.
    The most recent sender SHOULD appear in the top-most 'Resent-From:'
    header; the most recent recipient(s) SHOULD appear in the top-most
    'Resent-To:' header; the time and date the message was most recently
    sent SHOULD appear in the top-most 'Resent-Date:' header.

    'Received:' Headers

    When a message is gatewayed from MMS to Internet mail, a 'Received:'
    header MUST be added as per [SMTP].  The "with" clause should
    specify "MMS".



Gellens                   [Page 15]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    A message MAY be rejected if the number of 'Received:' headers
    exceeds a locally-defined maximum, which MUST conform to [SMTP]
    section 6.2 and SHOULD be no less than 100.

    Privacy

    Note that MMS systems do not currently support the 'Privacy' header
    field as described by [VPIM].

    Content

    The message content appears in the message body.  Note that Internet
    message format requires that line-endings be encoded as CR LF, thus
    charset encodings that do not have this property cannot be used in
    text/* body parts. (They may be used in other body parts, but only
    when they are suitable encoded or when binary transmission has been
    negotiated.) In particular, MMS allows UTF-16, while Internet
    message format does not.  UTF-16 encoding MUST be translated to
    UTF-8 or another charset and encoding which is suitable for use in
    Internet message format/protocols.


2.1.3.3 Conversion of messages from Internet to MMS format

    3GPP MMS Version

    An 'X-Mms-3GPP-MMS-Version:' header SHOULD be added.

    Message Type (of PDU)

    An 'X-Mms-Message-Type:' header SHOULD be used in accordance with
    the specific MMS interface (e.g., MM1, MM4).

    Transaction ID

    An 'X-Mms-Transaction-Id:' header SHOULD be used in accordance with
    the specific MMS interface (e.g., MM1, MM4).

    Message ID

    The 'Message-Id:' header MUST be retained.  If not present it MUST
    be created, with a unique value.

    Recipient(s) address

    'To:' and 'Cc:' headers MUST be retained.





Gellens                   [Page 16]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    Each recipient contained in the [SMTP] envelope (RCPT TO values)
    MUST be considered a recipient of the message.  Recipients who
    appear in address headers but not the [SMTP] envelope MUST be
    ignored.  Recipients who appear in the [SMTP] envelope but do not
    appear in headers are considered "blind" (Bcc) recipients; such
    recipients MUST NOT be added to message headers (including address
    and trace headers) unless there is only one recipient total.

    Sender address

    The 'From:' header MUST be retained.

    Content type

    The complete 'Content-Type:' header (including any parameters)
    SHOULD be preserved.

    Message class

    An 'X-Mms-Message-Class: personal' header MAY be created for all
    received messages with a non-null return path (MAIL FROM value in
    the SMTP envelope).  An 'X-Mms-Message-Class: auto' header MAY be
    created for messages with a null return path.

    Time of Expiry

    An 'X-Mms-Expiry:' header SHOULD be created if the message contains
    a relative time to expiration in the DELIVER-BY extension, as
    specified in [Deliver-By].

    Earliest delivery time

    An 'X-Mms-Delivery-Time:' header SHOULD NOT be created.  If a
    message arrives via [SMTP] relay containing an earliest time of
    delivery in the AFTER extension, it MAY be rejected.  If a message
    is submitted via Message Submission [Submission] containing an
    earliest time of delivery in the AFTER extension, it MUST either be
    retained until the delivery time arrives, or it may be immediately
    rejected.  It MUST NOT be delivered or further relayed prior to the
    delivery time.

    Delivery report request

    An 'X-Mms-Delivery-Report:' header SHOULD be created for messages
    which request 'success' or 'none' delivery status notification by
    use of the DSN extension as specified in [DSN-SMTP].  Requests for
    'delay' notifications or non-default actions, such as that only the
    message headers should be returned, cannot be mapped onto MMS
    headers and thus SHOULD be ignored.


Gellens                   [Page 17]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    Priority

    An 'X-Priority:' or 'Importance:' header, if present, SHOULD be
    replaced with an 'X-Mms-Priority:' header.  Suggested mappings:

2.1.3.3.1 Table 4:  Priority Mappings (Internet Message to MMS)

        -------------------------------|----------------------
        'X-Priority: 1 (highest)'      |'X-Mms-Priority: High'
        -------------------------------|----------------------
        'X-Priority: 2 (high)'         |'X-Mms-Priority: High'
        -------------------------------|----------------------
        'Importance: High'             |'X-Mms-Priority: High'
        -------------------------------|----------------------
        'X-Priority: 3 (normal)'       |      [omitted]
        -------------------------------|----------------------
        'Importance: Normal'           |      [omitted]
        -------------------------------|----------------------
        'X-Priority: 4 (low)'          |'X-Mms-Priority: Low'
        -------------------------------|----------------------
        'Importance: Low'              |'X-Mms-Priority: Low'
        -------------------------------|----------------------
        'X-Priority: 5 (lowest)'       |'X-Mms-Priority: Low'
        -------------------------------|----------------------

    Normal priority messages SHOULD omit the 'X-Mms-Priority:' header.

    Sender visibility

    Support for sender address hiding is not currently supported.

    Read reply request

    A request for a read reply contained in a
    'Disposition-Notification-To:' header as specified in [MDN] SHOULD
    be replaced with an 'X-Mms-Read-Reply:' header.

    Subject

    The 'Subject:' header MUST be preserved.

    Resending

    One or more sets of 'Resent-' headers, if present, SHOULD be mapped
    to 'To:', 'From:', 'Date:', and 'X-Mms-Previously-Sent-' headers.






Gellens                   [Page 18]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    'Received:' Headers

    Each system that processes a message SHOULD add a 'Received:' header
    as per [SMTP].  A message MAY be rejected if the number of
    'Received:' headers exceeds a locally-defined maximum, which MUST
    conform to [SMTP] section 6.2 and SHOULD be no less than 100.

    Sensitivity

    The 'Sensitivity:' header field (value = "personal" or "private")
    [VPIM] indicates the desire of a voice message originator to send
    the message contents to the original recipient list with assurance
    that the message will not be forwarded further by either the
    messaging system or the actual message recipient(s).  Since
    sensitivity is not an MMS feature, any messages which contain a
    'Sensitivity:' header MUST NOT be sent to an MMS system.  The
    associated negative delivery status report MUST include the extended
    status code [RESP] 5.6.0 as specified in [VPIM] ("Other or undefined
    protocol status") indicating that privacy could not be assured.

    Content

    The message content appears in the message body.


2.1.4 Report Generation and Conversion

    Internet Message systems use the multipart/report MIME type for
    delivery and disposition reports as specified in [Report-Fmt].  This
    format is a two- or three-part MIME message; one part is a
    structured format describing the event being reported in an
    easy-to-parse format.  Specific reports have a format which is built
    on [Report-Fmt].  Delivery reports are specified in [DSN-Msg].
    Message disposition reports, which include read reports, are
    specified in [MDN].

    By contrast, MMS reports are plain text, with no defined structure
    specified.  This makes it difficult to convert from an MMS report to
    a standard Internet report.

    An implementation conforming to this specification MUST convert
    reports received from one side (MMS or Internet mail) destined for
    the other.  In addition, reports MUST be generated as appropriate
    for messages received from either side.  For example, if an MM to be
    sent via Internet mail is not deliverable, a delivery status MM
    shall be generated.  Likewise, if an Internet message is received
    that cannot be further relayed or delivered, a delivery status
    report [DSN-Msg] MUST be generated.



Gellens                   [Page 19]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    When creating delivery or disposition reports from MMS reports, the
    MMS report should be parsed to determine the reported event and
    time, status, and the headers of the referenced (original) message.
    These elements, once determined, are used to populate the subparts
    of the delivery or disposition report.  The first subpart is of type
    text/plain, and contains a human-readable explanation of the event.
    This text may include a statement that the report was synthesized
    based on an MMS report.  The second subpart is of type
    report/delivery-status (for delivery reports) or
    report/disposition-notification (for disposition reports).  This
    second part contains a structured itemization of the event.  The
    third subpart is of type message/rfc822 and includes the headers and
    optionally the body of the referenced (original) message.


2.1.4.1 Delivery Report Mapping from MMS to Internet Message

    The following table maps information elements from MMS delivery
    reports to the format specified in [DSN-Msg].

2.1.4.1.1 Table 5:  Delivery Report Mappings (MMS to Internet Message)

======================|============|===================================
Information Element   |MMS Delivery|[DSN-Msg] Element
                      |Report Elem |
======================|============|===================================
ID of message whose   |Message-Id: |'Original-Envelope-ID' field of
delivery status is    |            |per-message fields (use value of
being reported        |            |ENVID from SMTP envelope if avail-
                      |            |able, 'Message-ID:' otherwise).
----------------------|------------|-----------------------------------
Recipient address of  |From:       |'Final-Recipient' field of the
the original message  |            |per-recipient section
(object of delivery   |            |
report)               |            |
----------------------|------------|-----------------------------------
Destination address of|To:         |'To:' header field value of top-
report                |            |level.
                      |            |
                      |            |Value taken from [SMTP] envelope
                      |            |return-path of message being
                      |            |reported, not its 'From:' header
                      |            |field.
----------------------|------------|-----------------------------------
Date and time the     |Date:       |'Date:' header field value of top-
message was handled   |            |level
======================|============|===================================




Gellens                   [Page 20]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


======================|============|===================================
Information Element   |MMS Delivery|[DSN-Msg] Element
                      |Report Elem |
======================|============|===================================
Delivery status of    |X-Mms-      |Action and Status fields of
original message to   |   Status:  |per-recipient section.
each recipient        |            |
                      |            |The 'Action' field indicates if the
                      |            |message was delivered.
                      |            |
                      |            |For failed delivery an appropriate
                      |            |'Status' value shall be included
                      |            |per [DSN-Msg].
                      |            |
                      |            |The Action field is set to one of
                      |            |the following values:
                      |            |
                      |            |* delivered (used for MMS status
                      |            |values 'retrieved' and 'rejected',
                      |            |depending on 'Status' code).
                      |            |
                      |            |* failed (used for MMS status
                      |            |values 'expired' and 'unreachable')
                      |            |
                      |            |* delayed MAY be used for MMS
                      |            |status value 'deferred'
                      |            |
                      |            |* relayed (used for MMS status
                      |            |value 'indeterminate')
                      |            |
                      |            |* expanded (SHOULD NOT be used)
----------------------|------------|-----------------------------------
Status Text           |            |Text in first part (human-readable
                      |            |part)
----------------------|------------|-----------------------------------

    When an MMS Relay/Server generates a [DSN-Msg] in response to a
    message received using [SMTP] on MM3:

    * Top-level header field 'To:' SHOULD be the [SMTP] return-path of
    the message whose status is being reported.

    * Top-level header field 'From:' SHOULD be the address of the
    recipient that the delivery-report concerns.

    * The first part of the [DSN-Msg] SHOULD include the MM Status Text
    field that would have been generated for an MM1 delivery-report.




Gellens                   [Page 21]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


2.1.4.2 Delivery Report Mapping from Internet Message to MMS

    The following table maps information elements from a delivery report
    as specified in [DSN-Msg] to the format of an MMS delivery report.

2.1.4.2.1 Table 6:  Delivery Report Mappings (Internet Message to MMS)

===================|==================|================================
Information Element|MMS Delivery      |[DSN-Msg] Element
                   |Report Element    |
===================|==================|================================
ID of the original |Message-Id:       |'Original-Envelope-ID' field of
message (object of |                  |per-message fields.  If not
delivery report)   |                  |available, the 'Message-ID'
                   |                  |header field of the message
                   |                  |being reported, if included in
                   |                  |the third part, may be
                   |                  |substituted.
-------------------|------------------|--------------------------------
Recipient address  |From:             |If available, the 'Original
of the original    |                  |-Recipient' field of the per-
message (object of |                  |recipient section should be
delivery report)   |                  |used; otherwise the 'Final-
                   |                  |Recipient' field of the per-
                   |                  |recipient section is used
-------------------|------------------|--------------------------------
Destination address|To:               |'To:' header field value of
of report          |                  |top-level.
                   |                  |
                   |                  |Value taken from [SMTP] envelope
                   |                  |return-path of message being
                   |                  |reported, not its 'From:' header
                   |                  |field.
===================|==================|================================

















Gellens                   [Page 22]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


===================|==================|================================
Information Element|MMS Delivery      |[DSN-Msg] Element
                   |Report Element    |
===================|==================|================================
Date and time the  |Date:             |'Date:' header field value of
message was handled|                  |top-level
-------------------|------------------|--------------------------------
Delivery status of |X-Mms-Status:     |'Action' and 'Status' fields of
original message   |                  |per-recipient section
                   |Set to one of the |
                   |following values: |
                   |                  |
                   |'retrieved' (used |
                   |for 'Action' value|
                   |'delivered').     |
                   |                  |
                   |'unreachable'     |
                   |(used for 'Action'|
                   |value 'failed')   |
                   |                  |
                   |'forwarded' (used |
                   |for 'Action' value|
                   |'relayed')        |
                   |                  |
                   |'deferred' MUST   |
                   |NOT be used       |
                   |(ignore DSNs with |
                   |'Action' value    |
                   |'delayed')        |
-------------------|------------------|--------------------------------
Status Text        |                  |Text in first part (human-
                   |                  |readable part)
===================|==================|================================


















Gellens                   [Page 23]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


2.1.4.3 Read Report Mapping from MMS to Internet Message

    The following table maps information elements from MMS read reports
    to the format specified in [MDN].

2.1.4.3.1 Table 7:  Read Report Mappings (MMS to Internet Message)

======================|============|===================================
Information Element   |MMS Delivery|[MDN] Element
                      |Report Elem |
======================|============|===================================
ID of the original    |Message-Id: |'Original-Envelope-ID' field (use
message (object of    |            |value of ENVID from [SMTP] envelope
read report)          |            |if available, 'Message-ID:'
                      |            |otherwise).
----------------------|------------|-----------------------------------
Recipient address of  |From:       |'Final-Recipient' field
the original message  |            |
----------------------|------------|-----------------------------------
Destination address of|To:         |'To:' header field value of top-
report                |            |level.
                      |            |
                      |            |Value taken from 'Disposition-
                      |            |Notification-To:' header field of
                      |            |message being reported, not its
                      |            |'From:' header field.
----------------------|------------|-----------------------------------
Date and time the     |Date:       |'Date:' header field value of top-
message was handled   |            |level
----------------------|------------|-----------------------------------
Disposition of message|X-Mms-Read- |Disposition-field
being reported        |   Status:  |
                      |            |For MMS-Read-Status value 'read',
                      |            |use 'disposition-type' value
                      |            |'displayed'; for MMS-Read-Status
                      |            |value 'Deleted without being read',
                      |            |use 'disposition-type' value
                      |            |'deleted')
----------------------|------------|-----------------------------------
Status Text           |            |Text in first part (human-readable
                      |            |part)
======================|============|===================================

    When an MMS Relay/Server generates an [MDN] in response to a message
    received using [SMTP] on MM3:






Gellens                   [Page 24]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    * Top-level header field 'To:' SHOULD be the value of the
    'Disposition-Notification-To:' header field of the message whose
    disposition is being reported .

    * Top-level header field 'From:' SHOULD be the address of the
    recipient that the read report concerns.


2.1.4.4 Disposition Report Mapping from Internet Message to MMS

    The following table maps information elements from a disposition
    report as specified in [MDN] to the format of an MMS read report.

2.1.4.4.1 Table 8:  Disposition Report Mappings (Internet Message to
     MMS)

===================|==================|================================
Information Element|MMS Read Report   |[MDN] Element
                   |Element           |
===================|==================|================================
ID of the original |Message-Id:       |'Original-Envelope-ID' field
message (object of |                  |
disposition report)|                  |
-------------------|------------------|--------------------------------
Recipient address  |From:             |'Final-Recipient' field
of the original    |                  |
message            |                  |
-------------------|------------------|--------------------------------
Destination address|To:               |'To:' header field value of
of report          |                  |top-level.
                   |                  |
                   |                  |Value taken from 'Disposition-
                   |                  |Notification-To:' header field
                   |                  |of message being reported, not
                   |                  |its 'From:' header field.
-------------------|------------------|--------------------------------
Date and time the  |Date:             |'Date:' header field value of
message was handled|                  |top-level
===================|==================|================================












Gellens                   [Page 25]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


===================|==================|================================
Information Element|MMS Read Report   |[MDN] Element
                   |Element           |
===================|==================|================================
Disposition of     |X-Mms-Read-Status:|disposition-field
message being      |                  |
reported           |Set to one of the |
                   |following values: |
                   |                  |
                   |'read' (used for  |
                   |disposition-type  |
                   |value 'displayed')|
                   |                  |
                   |'Deleted without  |
                   |being read' (used |
                   |for disposition-  |
                   |types 'deleted',  |
                   |'denied' and      |
                   |'failed' when     |
                   |action-mode is    |
                   |'automatic-       |
                   |action')          |
-------------------|------------------|--------------------------------
Status Text        |                  |Text in first part (human-
                   |                  |readable part)
===================|==================|================================


2.1.5 Message Delivery

    Within Internet mail, when [SMTP] is used and delivery reports are
    requested [DSN-SMTP], delivery is considered to be acceptance of a
    message by the final server, that is, the server closest to the
    recipient.  When an MMS Relay/Server receives a message using [SMTP]
    and a delivery report is requested, the MMS Relay/Server MAY
    consider the message delivered when it has been sent to the MMS User
    Agent.


3 Security Considerations

    Both MMS and Internet mail have their own set of security risks and
    considerations.  This document specifies how to exchange messages
    between these two environments, so it is only appropriate to discuss
    considerations specific to this functionality, not those inherent in
    either environment.





Gellens                   [Page 26]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    When a message uses end-to-end security mechanisms such as [PGP] or
    S/MIME [SMIME], servers MUST be careful not to accidently destroy
    the integrity of the protected content (for example, by altering any
    text within the region covered by a signature while mapping between
    MMS and email). [Mime-Sec-gw] discusses issues with use of such
    mechanisms in gateways.

    Some MMS features contain inherently more risk than others,
    including reply charging and sender address hiding.  Support for
    these mechanisms are not included in this document.


4 IANA Considerations

    IANA is requested to add "MMS" as a "WITH protocol types" under its
    "MAIL Parameters" registry.  The description is "Multimedia
    Messaging Service"; the referece is to this document.


5 Acknowledgements

    A number of people contributed to this document, especially the
    members of the IETF Lemonade group, including Greg Vaudreuil.  John
    Klensin did a very thorough and helpful review.  Greg White caught a
    large number of nits.  Ted Hardie was very helpful.


6 Normative References


    IETF:

    [DSN-Msg] "An Extensible Message Format for Delivery Status
    Notifications", Moore, Vaudreuil, RFC 3464, January 2003.

    [DSN-SMTP] "SMTP Service Extension for Delivery Status
    Notifications", Moore, RFC 3461, January 2003.

    [Hdr-Enc] "MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Three:
    Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text", Moore, RFC 2047,
    November 1996.

    [KEYWORDS] Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
    Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, Harvard University, March 1997.

    [MDN] "Message Disposition Notification", Hansen, Vaudreuil, RFC
    3798, May 2004.




Gellens                   [Page 27]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    [Msg-Fmt] "Internet Message Format", Resnick, RFC 2822, April 2001.

    [Report-Fmt] "The Multipart/Report Content Type for the Reporting of
    Mail System Administrative Messages", Vaudreuil, RFC 3462, January
    2003

    [RESP] "Enhanced Mail System Status Codes", Vaudreuil, RFC 3463,
    January 2003.

    [SMTP] "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", Klensin, RFC 2821, April
    2001.

    OMA:

        OMA specifications are available at the OMA web site
        <http://www.openmobilealliance.org>.

    [OMA-MMS] OMA-WAP-MMS-ENC-V1_2-20040323-C

    3GPP2 and 3GPP:

        3GPP2 specifications are available at the 3GPP2 (Third
        Generation Partnership Project 2) web site
        <http://www.3gpp2.org>.

        3GPP specifications are available at the 3GPP (Third Generation
        Partnership Project) web site <http://www.3gpp.org>

    [Stage_3] "MMS MM1 Stage 3 using OMA/WAP", X.S0016-310

    "MMS MM4 Stage 3 Inter-Carrier Interworking", X.S0016-340

    "Multimedia Messaging Service:  Functional description; Stage 2", TS
    23.140 Release 5.


7 Informative References

    IETF:

    [Auth] "SMTP Service Extension for Authentication", Myers, RFC 2554,
    March 1999

    [BINARY] SMTP Service Extensions for Transmission of Large and
    Binary MIME Messages", Vaudreuil, Parsons, RFC 3030, December 2000.






Gellens                   [Page 28]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    [Codes] "SMTP Service Extension for Returning Enhanced Error Codes",
    Freed, RFC 2034, October 1996.

    [Deliver-By] "Deliver By SMTP Service Extension", Newman, RFC 2852,
    June 2000.

    [Hdrs] "Common Internet Message Headers", J. Palme, RFC 2076,
    February 1997.

    [IPSec] "Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol", Kent,
    Atkinson, RFC 2401, November 1998

    [Mime-Sec-gw] "Gateways and MIME Security Multiparts", N. Feed, RFC
    2480, January 1999.

    [PGP] "MIME Security with OpenPGP", Elkins, Del Torto, Levien,
    Roessler, RFC 3156, August 2001

    [SMIME] "S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification", Ramsdell, RFC
    2633, June 1999

    [StartTLS] "SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over Transport
    Layer Security", Hoffman, RFC 3207, February 2002

    [Submission] "Message Submission", Gellens, Klensin, RFC 2476,
    December 1998.

    [VPIM] "Voice Profile for Internet Mail - version 2 (VPIMv2)",
    Vaudreuil, Parsons, RFC 3801, June 2004.

    [Formats] "Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) Media Format and
    Codecs for cdma2000 Spread Spectrum Systems", C.S0045

    [Overview] "Multimedia Messaging Services (MMS) Overview",
    X.S0016-000

    [Stage_1] "Multimedia Messaging Services (MMS); Stage 1",
    Requirements, October 2002, S.R0064-0.

    [Stage_2] "Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS); Stage 2", Functional
    Specification, April 2003, X.S0016-200.

              "Multimedia Messaging Service; Media formats and codecs",
    TS26.140Release 5.







Gellens                   [Page 29]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


8 Author's Address

    Randall Gellens
    QUALCOMM Incorporated
    5775 Morehouse Drive
    San Diego, CA  92121
    randy@qualcomm.com


Appendix A:  Changes Since Last Version

    [ This section to be deleted upon publication ]

    Changes from -04 to -05:
    o   Abstract now mentions use of X-MMS-* headers in MMS.
    o   Deleted "(MAY set to locally-generated value to hide sender
        identity)" from Table 1.
    o   Deleted X-Priority from Table 1.
    o   Replaced comment with empty group syntax' header in section
        2.1.3.2.
    o   Added Acknowledgements section.
    o   Removed distinction between SMTP/821 and ESMTP/2821.
    o   Removed discussion of sender address hiding.
    o   Removed content transformation.
    o   Replaced "Gateway" with reference to RFC 2821 Section 2.3.8.
    o   Deleted 'Resent-Count:'
    o   Deleted background information on resending/forwarding.
    o   Changed 'Received:' headder generation to MUST on MMS->Internet.
    o   Specified response code for "sensitivity" as per [VPIM].
    o   Changed "sensitivity" response code from SHOULD to MUST.
    o   Removed reference to RFC 934.
    o   Removed definition and mentions of anonymous remailer.
    o   Rewrote and greatly simplified Security Considerations.
    o   Added "MMS" as a "WITH protocol type" and requested IANA to
        register this in its "MAIL Parameters" registry.
    o   Moved MMS references from Informative to Normative.
    o   Removed hand-waving about Message-ID.
    o   Attempted to clarify responsibility for report generation.


Intellectual Property Statement

    The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
    Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed
    to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described
    in this document or the extent to which any license under such
    rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that
    it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights.
    Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC


Gellens                   [Page 30]                   Expires March 2006

Internet Draft   Mapping Between MMS and Internet Mail   September 2005


    documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

    Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
    assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
    attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use
    of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
    specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository
    at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

    The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
    copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
    rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
    this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
    ietf-ipr@ietf.org.


Full Copyright Statement

    Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

    This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
    contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
    retain all their rights.

    This document and the information contained herein are provided on
    an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE
    REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE
    INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR
    IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
    THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
    WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.




















Gellens                   [Page 31]                   Expires March 2006


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.107, available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/