[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 RFC 5740

Reliable Multicast Transport (RMT)                            B. Adamson
Working Group                                                        NRL
Internet-Draft                                                C. Bormann
Expires: 31 December 2007                        Universitaet Bremen TZI
                                                              M. Handley
                                                                     UCL
                                                               J. Macker
                                                                     NRL
                                                              March 2007


            NACK-Oriented Reliable Multicast (NORM) Protocol
                   draft-ietf-rmt-pi-norm-revised-05

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on December 31, 2007.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).









Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007               [Page 1]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


Abstract

   This document describes the messages and procedures of the Negative-
   acknowledgment (NACK) Oriented Reliable Multicast (NORM) protocol.
   This protocol is designed to provide end-to-end reliable transport of
   bulk data objects or streams over generic IP multicast routing and
   forwarding services.  NORM uses a selective, negative acknowledgment
   mechanism for transport reliability and offers additional protocol
   mechanisms to allow for operation with minimal "a priori"
   coordination among senders and receivers.  A congestion control
   scheme is specified to allow the NORM protocol to fairly share
   available network bandwidth with other transport protocols such as
   Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).  It is capable of operating with
   both reciprocal multicast routing among senders and receivers and
   with asymmetric connectivity (possibly a unicast return path) between
   the senders and receivers.  The protocol offers a number of features
   to allow different types of applications or possibly other higher
   level transport protocols to utilize its service in different ways.
   The protocol leverages the use of FEC-based repair and other IETF
   reliable multicast transport (RMT) building blocks in its design.































Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007               [Page 2]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


                           Table of Contents


1. Introduction and Applicability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
 1.1. NORM Delivery Service Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
 1.2. NORM Scalability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
 1.3. Environmental Requirements and Considerations. . . . . . . . .   9
2. Architecture Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
 2.1. Protocol Operation Overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
 2.2. Protocol Building Blocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
 2.3. Design Tradeoffs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
3. Conformance Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
4. Message Formats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
 4.1. NORM Common Message Header and Extensions. . . . . . . . . . .  17
 4.2. Sender Messages. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
  4.2.1. NORM_DATA Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
  4.2.2. NORM_INFO Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  30
  4.2.3. NORM_CMD Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  32
 4.3. Receiver Messages. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  50
  4.3.1. NORM_NACK Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  50
  4.3.2. NORM_ACK Message. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  57
 4.4. General Purpose Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  59
  4.4.1. NORM_REPORT Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  59
5. Detailed Protocol Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  59
 5.1. Sender Initialization and Transmission . . . . . . . . . . . .  61
  5.1.1. Object Segmentation Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  62
 5.2. Receiver Initialization and Reception. . . . . . . . . . . . .  63
 5.3. Receiver NACK Procedure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  63
 5.4. Sender NACK Processing and Response. . . . . . . . . . . . . .  66
  5.4.1. Sender Repair State Aggregation . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  66
  5.4.2. Sender FEC Repair Transmission Strategy . . . . . . . . . .  67
  5.4.3. Sender NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) Generation . . . . . . . . . . . .  68
  5.4.4. Sender NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) Generation. . . . . . . . . . .  69
 5.5. Additional Protocol Mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  69
  5.5.1. Greatest Round-trip Time Collection . . . . . . . . . . . .  70
  5.5.2. NORM Congestion Control Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . .  71
  5.5.3. NORM Positive Acknowledgment Procedure. . . . . . . . . . .  80
  5.5.4. Group Size Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  82
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  82
 6.1. Baseline Secure NORM Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  83
  6.1.1. IPSec Approach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  84
  6.1.2. IPSec Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  86
   6.1.2.1. Selectors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  86
   6.1.2.2. Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  87
   6.1.2.3. Key Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  87
   6.1.2.4. Security Policy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  87
   6.1.2.5. Authentication and Encryption. . . . . . . . . . . . . .  87
   6.1.2.6. Availability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  87



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007               [Page 3]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  88
8. Suggested Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  89
9. Changes from RFC3940. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  89
10. Acknowledgments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  90
11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  90
 11.1. Normative References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  90
 11.2. Informative References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  91
12. Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  93
13. Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  94










































Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007               [Page 4]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


1.  Introduction and Applicability

   The Negative-acknowledgment (NACK) Oriented Reliable Multicast (NORM)
   protocol is designed to provide reliable transport of data from one
   or more sender(s) to a group of receivers over an IP multicast
   network.  The primary design goals of NORM are to provide efficient,
   scalable, and robust bulk data (e.g., computer files, transmission of
   persistent data) transfer across possibly heterogeneous IP networks
   and topologies.  The NORM protocol design provides support for
   distributed multicast session participation with minimal coordination
   among senders and receivers.  NORM allows senders and receivers to
   dynamically join and leave multicast sessions at will with minimal
   overhead for control information and timing synchronization among
   participants.  To accommodate this capability, NORM protocol message
   headers contain some common information allowing receivers to easily
   synchronize to senders throughout the lifetime of a reliable
   multicast session.  NORM is designed to be self-adapting to a wide
   range of dynamic network conditions with little or no pre-
   configuration.  The protocol is purposely designed to be tolerant of
   inaccurate timing estimations or lossy conditions that may occur in
   many networks including mobile and wireless.  The protocol is also
   designed to exhibit convergence and efficient operation even in
   situations of heavy packet loss and large queuing or transmission
   delays.

   This document is a product of the IETF RMT WG and follows the
   guidelines provided in RFC 3269 [9].  The key words "MUST", "MUST
   NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT",
   "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be
   interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119 [1].

Statement of Intent

   This memo contains the definitions necessary to fully specify a
   Reliable Multicast Transport protocol in accordance with RFC 2357.
   RFC3940 [10] contained a previous description of the NORM Protocol
   specification described in this document.  RF3940 was published in
   the "Experimental" category.  It was the stated intent of the RMT
   working group to re-submit this specifications as an IETF Proposed
   Standard in due course.

   This Proposed Standard specification is thus based on RFC3940 [10]
   and has been updated according to accumulated experience and growing
   protocol maturity since the publication of RFC3940.  Said experience
   applies both to this specification itself and to congestion control
   strategies related to the use of this specification.

   The differences between RFC3940 [10] and this document are listed in



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007               [Page 5]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   Section 9.

1.1.  NORM Delivery Service Model

   A NORM protocol instance (NormSession) is defined within the context
   of participants communicating connectionless (e.g., Internet Protocol
   (IP) or User Datagram Protocol (UDP)) packets over a network using
   pre-determined addresses and host port numbers.  Generally, the
   participants exchange packets using an IP multicast group address,
   but unicast transport may also be established or applied as an
   adjunct to multicast delivery.  In the case of multicast, the
   participating NormNodes will communicate using a common IP multicast
   group address and port number that has been chosen via means outside
   the context of the given NormSession.  Other IETF data format and
   protocol standards exist that may be applied to describe and convey
   the required "a priori" information for a specific NormSession (e.g.,
   Session Description Protocol (SDP) [11], Session Announcement
   Protocol (SAP) [12], etc.).

   The NORM protocol design is principally driven by the assumption of a
   single sender transmitting bulk data content to a group of receivers.
   However, the protocol MAY operate with multiple senders within the
   context of a single NormSession.  In initial implementations of this
   protocol, it is anticipated that multiple senders will transmit
   independent of one another and receivers will maintain state as
   necessary for each sender.  However, in future versions of NORM, it
   is possible that some aspects of protocol operation (e.g., round-trip
   time collection) may provide for alternate modes allowing more
   efficient performance for applications requiring multiple senders.

   NORM provides for three types of bulk data content objects
   (NormObjects) to be reliably transported.  These types include:

     1)   static computer memory data content (NORM_OBJECT_DATA type),

     2)   computer storage files (NORM_OBJECT_FILE type), and

     3)   non-finite streams of continuous data content
          (NORM_OBJECT_STREAM type).

   The distinction between NORM_OBJECT_DATA and NORM_OBJECT_FILE is
   simply to provide a "hint" to receivers in NormSessions serving
   multiple types of content as to what type of storage should be
   allocated for received content (i.e., memory or file storage).  Other
   than that distinction, the two are identical, providing for reliable
   transport of finite (but potentially very large) units of content.
   These static data and file services are anticipated to be useful for
   multicast-based cache applications with the ability to reliably



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007               [Page 6]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   provide transmission of large quantities of static data.  Other types
   of static data/file delivery services might make use of these
   transport object types, too.  The use of the NORM_OBJECT_STREAM type
   is at the application's discretion and could be used to carry static
   data or file content also.  The NORM reliable stream service opens up
   additional possibilities such as serialized reliable messaging or
   other unbounded, perhaps dynamically produced content.  The
   NORM_OBJECT_STREAM provides for reliable transport analogous to that
   of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), although NORM receivers
   will be able to begin receiving stream content at any point in time.
   The applicability of this feature will depend upon the application.

   The NORM protocol also allows for a small amount of "out-of-band"
   data (sent as NORM_INFO messages) to be attached to the data content
   objects transmitted by the sender.  This readily-available "out-of-
   band" data allows multicast receivers to quickly and efficiently
   determine the nature of the corresponding data, file, or stream bulk
   content being transmitted.  This allows application-level control of
   the receiver node's participation in the current transport activity.
   This also allows the protocol to be flexible with minimal pre-
   coordination among senders and receivers.  The NORM_INFO content is
   designed to be atomic in that its size MUST fit into the payload
   portion of a single NORM message.

   NORM does _not_ provide for global or application-level
   identification of data content within in its message headers.  Note
   the NORM_INFO out-of-band data mechanism could be leveraged by the
   application for this purpose if desired, or identification could
   alternatively be embedded within the data content.  NORM does
   identify transmitted content (NormObjects) with transport identifiers
   that are applicable only while the sender is transmitting and/or
   repairing the given object.  These transport data content identifiers
   (NormTransportIds) are assigned in a monotonically increasing fashion
   by each NORM sender during the course of a NormSession.  Each sender
   maintains its NormTransportId assignments independently so that
   individual NormObjects may be uniquely identified during transport
   with the concatenation of the sender session-unique identifier
   (NormNodeId) and the assigned NormTransportId.  The NormTransportIds
   are assigned from a large, but fixed, numeric space in increasing
   order and may be reassigned during long-lived sessions.  The NORM
   protocol provides mechanisms so that the sender application may
   terminate transmission of data content and inform the group of this
   in an efficient manner.  Other similar protocol control mechanisms
   (e.g., session termination, receiver synchronization, etc.) are
   specified so that reliable multicast application variants may
   construct different, complete bulk transfer communication models to
   meet their goals.




Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007               [Page 7]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   To summarize, the NORM protocol provides reliable transport of
   different types of data content (including potentially mixed types).
   The senders enqueue and transmit bulk content in the form of static
   data or files and/or non-finite, ongoing stream types.  NORM senders
   provide for repair transmission of data and/or FEC content in
   response to NACK messages received from the receiver group.
   Mechanisms for "out-of-band" information and other transport control
   mechanisms are specified for use by applications to form complete
   reliable multicast solutions for different purposes.

1.2.  NORM Scalability

   Group communication scalability requirements lead to adaptation of
   negative acknowledgment (NACK) based protocol schemes when feedback
   for reliability is required [13].  NORM is a protocol centered around
   the use of selective NACKs to request repairs of missing data.  NORM
   provides for the use of packet-level forward error correction (FEC)
   techniques for efficient multicast repair and optional proactive
   transmission robustness [14].  FEC-based repair can be used to
   greatly reduce the quantity of reliable multicast repair requests and
   repair transmissions [15] in a NACK-oriented protocol.  The principal
   factor in NORM scalability is the volume of feedback traffic
   generated by the receiver set to facilitate reliability and
   congestion control.  NORM uses probabilistic suppression of redundant
   feedback based on exponentially distributed random backoff timers.
   The performance of this type of suppression relative to other
   techniques is described in [16].  NORM dynamically measures the
   group's roundtrip timing status to set its suppression and other
   protocol timers.  This allows NORM to scale well while maintaining
   reliable data delivery transport with low latency relative to the
   network topology over which it is operating.

   Feedback messages can be either multicast to the group at large or
   sent via unicast routing to the sender.  In the case of unicast
   feedback, the sender "advertises" the feedback state to the group to
   facilitate feedback suppression.  In typical Internet environments,
   it is expected that the NORM protocol will readily scale to group
   sizes on the order of tens of thousands of receivers.  A study of the
   quantity of feedback for this type of protocol is described in [17].
   NORM is able to operate with a smaller amount of feedback than a
   single TCP connection, even with relatively large numbers of
   receivers.  Thus, depending upon the network topology, it is possible
   that NORM may scale to larger group sizes.  With respect to computer
   resource usage, the NORM protocol does _not_ require that state be
   kept on all receivers in the group.  NORM senders maintain state only
   for receivers providing explicit congestion control feedback.  NORM
   receivers must maintain state for each active sender.  This may
   constrain the number of simultaneous senders in some uses of NORM.



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007               [Page 8]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


1.3.  Environmental Requirements and Considerations

   All of the environmental requirements and considerations that apply
   to the RMT NORM Building Block [3], the RMT FEC Building Block [4],
   and the RMT TCP-Friendly Multicast Congestion Control (TFMCC)
   Building Block [5], also apply to the NORM protocol.

   The NORM protocol SHALL be capable of operating in an end-to-end
   fashion with no assistance from intermediate systems beyond basic IP
   multicast group management, routing, and forwarding services.  While
   the techniques utilized in NORM are principally applicable to "flat"
   end-to-end IP multicast topologies, they could also be applied in the
   sub-levels of hierarchical (e.g., tree-based) multicast distribution
   if so desired.  NORM can make use of reciprocal (among senders and
   receivers) multicast communication under the Any-Source Multicast
   (ASM) model defined in RFC 1112 [2], but SHALL also be capable of
   scalable operation in asymmetric topologies such as Source Specific
   Multicast (SSM) [18] where there may only be unicast routing service
   from the receivers to the sender(s).

   NORM is compatible with IPv4 and IPv6.  Additionally, NORM may be
   used with networks employing Network Address Translation (NAT)
   providing the NAT device supports IP multicast and/or can cache UDP
   traffic source port numbers for remapping feedback traffic from
   receivers to the sender(s).

2.  Architecture Definition

   A NormSession is comprised of participants (NormNodes) acting as
   senders and/or receivers.  NORM senders transmit data content in the
   form of NormObjects to the session destination address and the NORM
   receivers attempt to reliably receive the transmitted content using
   negative acknowledgments to request repair.  Each NormNode within a
   NormSession is assumed to have a preselected unique 32-bit identifier
   (NormNodeId).  NormNodes MUST have uniquely assigned identifiers
   within a single NormSession to distinguish between possible multiple
   senders and to distinguish feedback information from different
   receivers.  There are two reserved NormNodeId values.  A value of
   0x00000000 is considered an invalid NormNodeId value and a value of
   0xffffffff is a "wildcard" NormNodeId.  While the protocol does not
   preclude multiple sender nodes concurrently transmitting within the
   context of a single NORM session (i.e., many- to-many operation), any
   type of interactive coordination among NORM senders is assumed to be
   controlled by the application or higher protocol layer.  There are
   some optional mechanisms specified in this document that can be
   leveraged for such application layer coordination.

   As previously noted, NORM allows for reliable transmission of three



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007               [Page 9]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   different basic types of data content.  The first type is
   NORM_OBJECT_DATA, which is used for static, persistent blocks of data
   content maintained in the sender's application memory storage.  The
   second type is NORM_OBJECT_FILE, which corresponds to data stored in
   the sender's non-volatile file system.  The NORM_OBJECT_DATA and
   NORM_OBJECT_FILE types both represent "NormObjects" of finite but
   potentially very large size.  The third type of data content is
   NORM_OBJECT_STREAM, which corresponds to an ongoing transmission of
   undefined length.  This is analogous to the reliable stream service
   provide by TCP for unicast data transport.  The format of the stream
   content is application-defined and may be byte or message oriented.
   The NORM protocol provides for "flushing" of the stream to expedite
   delivery or possibly enforce application message boundaries.  NORM
   protocol implementations may offer either (or both) in-order delivery
   of the stream data to the receive application or out-of-order (more
   immediate) delivery of received segments of the stream to the
   receiver application.  In either case, NORM sender and receiver
   implementations provide buffering to facilitate repair of the stream
   as it is transported.

   All NormObjects are logically segmented into FEC coding blocks and
   symbols for transmission by the sender.  In NORM, an FEC encoding
   symbol directly corresponds to the payload of NORM_DATA messages or
   "segment".  Note that when systematic FEC codes are used, the payload
   of NORM_DATA messages sent for the first portion of a FEC encoding
   block are source symbols (actual segments of original user data),
   while the remaining symbols for the block consist of parity symbols
   generated by FEC encoding.  These parity symbols are generally sent
   in response to repair requests, but some number may be sent
   proactively at the end each encoding block to increase the robustness
   of transmission.  When non-systematic FEC codes are used, all symbols
   sent consist of FEC encoding parity content.  In this case, the
   receiver must receive a sufficient number of symbols to reconstruct
   (via FEC decoding) the original user data for the given block.  In
   this document, the terms "symbol" and "segment" are used
   interchangeably.

   Transmitted NormObjects are temporarily yet uniquely identified
   within the NormSession context using the given sender's NormNodeId,
   NormInstanceId, and a temporary NormObjectTransportId.  Depending
   upon the implementation, individual NORM senders may manage their
   NormInstanceIds independently, or a common NormInstanceId may be
   agreed upon for all participating nodes within a session if needed as
   a session identifier.  NORM NormObjectTransportId data content
   identifiers are sender-assigned and applicable and valid only during
   a NormObject's actual _transport_ (i.e., for as long as the sender is
   transmitting and providing repair of the indicated NormObject).  For
   a long-lived session, the NormObjectTransportId field can wrap and



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 10]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   previously-used identifiers may be re-used.  Note that globally
   unique identification of transported data content is not provided by
   NORM and, if required, must be managed by the NORM application.  The
   individual segments or symbols of the NormObject are further
   identified with FEC payload identifiers which include coding block
   and symbol identifiers.  These are discussed in detail later in this
   document.

2.1.  Protocol Operation Overview

   A NORM sender primarily generates messages of type NORM_DATA.  These
   messages carry original data segments or FEC symbols and repair
   segments/symbols for the bulk data/file or stream NormObjects being
   transferred.  By default, redundant FEC symbols are sent only in
   response to receiver repair requests (NACKs) and thus normally little
   or no additional transmission overhead is imposed due to FEC
   encoding.  However, the NORM implementation MAY be optionally
   configured to proactively transmit some amount of redundant FEC
   symbols along with the original content to potentially enhance
   performance (e.g., improved delay) at the cost of additional
   transmission overhead.  This option may be sensible for certain
   network conditions and can allow for robust, asymmetric multicast
   (e.g., unidirectional routing, satellite, cable) [19] with reduced
   receiver feedback, or, in some cases, no feedback.

   A sender message of type NORM_INFO is also defined and is used to
   carry OPTIONAL "out-of-band" context information for a given
   transport object.  A single NORM_INFO message can be associated with
   a NormObject.  Because of its atomic nature, missing NORM_INFO
   messages can be NACKed and repaired with a slightly lower delay
   process than NORM's general FEC-encoded data content.  NORM_INFO may
   serve special purposes for some bulk transfer, reliable multicast
   applications where receivers join the group mid-stream and need to
   ascertain contextual information on the current content being
   transmitted.  The NACK process for NORM_INFO will be described later.
   When the NORM_INFO message type is used, its transmission should
   precede transmission of any NORM_DATA message for the associated
   NormObject.

   The sender also generates messages of type NORM_CMD to assist in
   certain protocol operations such as congestion control, end-of-
   transmission flushing, round trip time estimation, receiver
   synchronization, and optional positive acknowledgment requests or
   application defined commands.  The transmission of NORM_CMD messages
   from the sender is accomplished by one of three different procedures.
   These procedures are: single, best effort unreliable transmission of
   the command; repeated redundant transmissions of the command; and
   positively-acknowledged commands.  The transmission technique used



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 11]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   for a given command depends upon the function of the command.
   Several core commands are defined for basic protocol operation.
   Additionally, implementations MAY wish to consider providing the
   OPTIONAL application-defined commands that can take advantage of the
   transmission methodologies available for commands.  This allows for
   application-level session management mechanisms that can make use of
   information available to the underlying NORM protocol engine (e.g.,
   round-trip timing, transmission rate, etc.).  A notable distinction
   between NORM_DATA message and some NORM_CMD message transmissions is
   that typically a receiver will need to allocate resources to manage
   reliable reception when NORM_DATA  messages are received.  However
   some NORM_CMD messages may be completely atomic and no specific state
   may need to be kept.  Thus, for session management or other purposes
   it is possible that even participants acting principally as data
   receivers MAY transmit NORM_CMD messages.  However, it is RECOMMENDED
   that this is not done within the context of the NORM multicast
   session unless congestion control is addressed.  For example, many
   receiver nodes transmitting NORM_CMD messages simultaneously can
   cause congestion for the destination(s).

   All sender transmissions are subject to rate control governed by a
   peak transmission rate set for each participant by the application.
   This can be used to limit the quantity of multicast data transmitted
   by the group.  When NORM's congestion control algorithm is enabled
   the rate for senders is automatically adjusted.  In some networks, it
   may be desirable to establish minimum and maximum bounds for the rate
   adjustment depending upon the application even when dynamic
   congestion control is enabled.  However, in the case of the general
   Internet, congestion control policy SHALL be observed that is
   compatible with coexistent TCP flows.

   NORM receivers generate messages of type NORM_NACK or NORM_ACK in
   response to transmissions of data and commands from a sender.  The
   NORM_NACK messages are generated to request repair of detected data
   transmission losses.  Receivers generally detect losses by tracking
   the sequence of transmission from a sender.  Sequencing information
   is embedded in the transmitted data packets and end-of-transmission
   commands from the sender.  NORM_ACK messages are generated in
   response to certain commands transmitted by the sender.  In the
   general (and most scalable) protocol mode, NORM_ACK messages are sent
   only in response to congestion control commands from the sender.  The
   feedback volume of these congestion control NORM_ACK messages is
   controlled using the same timer-based probabilistic suppression
   techniques as for NORM_NACK messages to avoid feedback implosion.  In
   order to meet potential application requirements for positive
   acknowledgment from receivers, other NORM_ACK messages are defined
   and available for use.




Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 12]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


2.2.  Protocol Building Blocks

   The operation of the NORM protocol is based primarily upon the
   concepts presented in the Nack-Oriented Reliable Multicast (NORM)
   Building Block document [3].  This includes the basic NORM
   architecture and the data transmission, repair, and feedback
   strategies discussed in that document.  Additional reliable multicast
   building blocks are applied in creating the full NORM protocol
   instantiation [20].  NORM also makes use of Forward Error Correction
   encoding techniques for repair messaging and optional transmission
   robustness as described in [14].  NORM uses the FEC Payload ID as
   specified by the FEC Building Block Document [4].  Additionally, for
   congestion control, this document includes a baseline congestion
   control mechanism (NORM-CC) based on the TCP-Friendly Multicast
   Congestion Control (TFMCC) scheme described in [24] and [5].

2.3.  Design Tradeoffs

   While the various features of NORM are designed to provide some
   measure of general purpose utility, it is important to emphasize the
   understanding that "no one size fits all" in the reliable multicast
   transport arena.  There are numerous engineering tradeoffs involved
   in reliable multicast transport design and this requires an increased
   awareness of application and network architecture considerations.
   Performance requirements affecting design can include:  group size,
   heterogeneity (e.g., capacity and/or delay), asymmetric delivery,
   data ordering, delivery delay, group dynamics, mobility, congestion
   control, and transport across low capacity connections.  NORM
   contains various parameters to accommodate many of these differing
   requirements.  The NORM protocol and its mechanisms MAY be applied in
   multicast applications outside of bulk data transfer, but there is an
   assumed model of bulk transfer transport service that drives the
   trade-offs that determine the scalability and performance described
   in this document.

   The ability of NORM to provide reliable data delivery is also
   governed by any buffer constraints of the sender and receiver
   applications.  NORM protocol implementations SHOULD be designed to
   operate with the greatest efficiency and robustness possible within
   application-defined buffer constraints.  Buffer requirements for
   reliability, as always, are a function of the delay-bandwidth product
   of the network topology.  NORM performs best when allowed more
   buffering resources than typical point-to-point transport protocols.
   This is because NORM feedback suppression is based upon randomly-
   delayed transmissions from the receiver set, rather than immediately
   transmitted feedback.  There are definitive tradeoffs between buffer
   utilization, group size scalability, and efficiency of performance.
   Large buffer sizes allow the NORM protocol to perform most



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 13]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   efficiently in large delay-bandwidth topologies and allow for longer
   feedback suppression backoff timeouts.  This yields improved group
   size scalability.  NORM can operate with reduced buffering but at a
   cost of decreased efficiency (lower relative goodput) and reduced
   group size scalability.

3.  Conformance Statement

   This Protocol Instantiation document, in conjunction with the RMT
   Building Block documents of [3] and [4], completely specifies a
   working reliable multicast transport protocol that conforms to the
   requirements described in RFC 2357 [21].







































Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 14]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   This document specifies the following message types and mechanisms
   which are REQUIRED in complying NORM protocol implementations:


 +---------------------+----------------------------------------------+
 |    Message Type     |                   Purpose                    |
 +---------------------+----------------------------------------------+
 |NORM_DATA            | Sender message for application data          |
 |                     | transmission.  Implementations must support  |
 |                     | at least one of the NORM_OBJECT_DATA,        |
 |                     | NORM_OBJECT_FILE, or NORM_OBJECT_STREAM      |
 |                     | delivery services.  The use of the NORM FEC  |
 |                     | Object Transmission Information header       |
 |                     | extension is OPTIONAL with NORM_DATA         |
 |                     | messages.                                    |
 +---------------------+----------------------------------------------+
 |NORM_CMD(FLUSH)      | Sender command to excite receivers for       |
 |                     | repair requests in lieu of ongoing NORM_DATA |
 |                     | transmissions.  Note the use of the          |
 |                     | NORM_CMD(FLUSH) for positive acknowledgment  |
 |                     | of data receipt is OPTIONAL.                 |
 +---------------------+----------------------------------------------+
 |NORM_CMD(SQUELCH)    | Sender command to advertise its current      |
 |                     | valid repair window in response to invalid   |
 |                     | requests for repair.                         |
 +---------------------+----------------------------------------------+
 |NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) | Sender command to advertise current repair   |
 |                     | (and congestion control state) to group when |
 |                     | unicast feedback messages are detected.      |
 |                     | Used to control/suppress excessive receiver  |
 |                     | feedback in asymmetric multicast topologies. |
 +---------------------+----------------------------------------------+
 |NORM_CMD(CC)         | Sender command used in collection of round   |
 |                     | trip timing and congestion control status    |
 |                     | from group (this may be OPTIONAL if          |
 |                     | alternative congestion control mechanism and |
 |                     | round trip timing collection is used).       |
 +---------------------+----------------------------------------------+
 |NORM_NACK            | Receiver message used to request repair of   |
 |                     | missing transmitted content.                 |
 +---------------------+----------------------------------------------+
 |NORM_ACK             | Receiver message used to proactively provide |
 |                     | feedback for congestion control purposes.    |
 |                     | Also used with the OPTIONAL NORM Positive    |
 |                     | Acknowledgment Process.                      |
 +---------------------+----------------------------------------------+





Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 15]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   This document also describes the following message types and
   associated mechanisms which are OPTIONAL for complying NORM protocol
   implementations:


+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|     Message Type      |                   Purpose                    |
+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|NORM_INFO              | Sender message for providing ancillary       |
|                       | context information associated with NORM     |
|                       | transport objects.  The use of the NORM FEC  |
|                       | Object Transmission Information header       |
|                       | extension is OPTIONAL with NORM_INFO         |
|                       | messages.                                    |
+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|NORM_CMD(EOT)          | Sender command to indicate it has reached    |
|                       | end-of-transmission and will no longer       |
|                       | respond to repair requests.                  |
+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ)      | Sender command to support application-       |
|                       | defined, positively acknowledged commands    |
|                       | sent outside of the context of the bulk data |
|                       | content being transmitted.  The NORM         |
|                       | Positive Acknowledgment Procedure associated |
|                       | with this message type is OPTIONAL.          |
+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|NORM_CMD(APPLICATION)  | Sender command containing application-       |
|                       | defined commands sent outside of the context |
|                       | of the bulk data content being transmitted.  |
+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------+
|NORM_REPORT            | Optional message type reserved for           |
|                       | experimental implementations of the NORM     |
|                       | protocol.                                    |
+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------+

4.  Message Formats

   As mentioned in Section 2.1, there are two primary classes of NORM
   messages: sender messages and receiver messages.  NORM_CMD,
   NORM_INFO, and NORM_DATA message types are generated by senders of
   data content, and NORM_NACK and NORM_ACK messages generated by
   receivers within a NormSession.  Sender messages SHOULD be governed
   by congestion control for Internet use.  For session management or
   other purposes, receivers may wish to employ NORM_CMD message
   transmissions.  The principal rationale for distiguishing sender and
   receiver messages is that receivers will typically need to allocate
   resources to support reliable reception from sender(s) and NORM
   sender messages are subject to congestion control.  NORM receivers



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 16]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   MAY employ the NORM_CMD message type for application-defined purposes
   but it is RECOMMENDED that congestion control and feedback implosion
   issues be addressed.  Additionally, an auxiliary message type of
   NORM_REPORT is also provided for experimental purposes.  This section
   describes the message formats used by the NORM protocol.  These
   messages and their fields are referenced in the detailed functional
   description of the NORM protocol given in Section 5.  Individual NORM
   messages are designed to be compatible with the MTU limitations of
   encapsulating Internet protocols including IPv4, IPv6, and UDP.  The
   current NORM protocol specification assumes UDP encapsulation and
   leverages the transport features of UDP.  The NORM messages are
   independent of network addresses and can be used in IPv4 and IPv6
   networks.

4.1.  NORM Common Message Header and Extensions

   There are some common message fields contained in all NORM message
   types.  Additionally, a header extension mechanism is defined to
   expand the functionality of the NORM protocol without revision to
   this document.  All NORM protocol messages begin with a common header
   with information fields as follows:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |version|  type |    hdr_len    |          sequence             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           source_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                     NORM Common Message Header Format

   The "version" field is a 4-bit value indicating the protocol version
   number.  NORM implementations SHOULD ignore received messages with
   version numbers different from their own. This number is intended to
   indicate and distinguish upgrades of the protocol which may be non-
   interoperable.  The NORM version number for this specification is 1.














Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 17]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   The message "type" field is a 4-bit value indicating the NORM
   protocol message type.  These types are defined as follows:


                            Message     Value

                          NORM_INFO       1
                          NORM_DATA       2
                          NORM_CMD        3
                          NORM_NACK       4
                          NORM_ACK        5
                          NORM_REPORT     6


   The 8-bit "hdr_len" field indicates the number of 32-bit words that
   comprise the given message's header portion.  This is used to
   facilitate header extensions that may be applied.  The presence of
   header extensions are implied when the "hdr_len" value is greater
   than the base value for the given message "type".

   The "sequence" field is a 16-bit value that is set by the message
   originator as a monotonically increasing number incremented with each
   NORM message transmitted.  Note that two independent "sequence"
   spaces MUST be maintained.  One sequence space SHALL be kept for NORM
   sender messages (NORM_INFO, NORM_DATA, and NORM_CMD) generated, and a
   separate, independent "sequence" space SHALL be kept for NORM
   receiver messages (NORM_NACK and NORM_NACK).  The sender message
   "sequence" value can be monitored by receiving nodes to detect packet
   losses in the transmissions from a sender and used to estimate raw
   packet loss for congestion control purposes.  Note that this value is
   NOT used in the NORM protocol to detect missing reliable data content
   and does NOT identify the application data or FEC payload that may be
   attached.  The "sequence" field may also be leveraged for protection
   from message "replay" attacks, particularly of NORM_NACK or other
   feedback messages.  For this reason, NORM receiver messages are also
   sequence numbered.  An independent sequence space MUST be used for
   receiver messages because when receivers generate unicast NORM_NACK
   or NORM_ACK messages, those messages will not be visible to the group
   at large that may be performing loss estimation.  Also, NORM
   congestion control is applied only to sender messages.  The size of
   the "sequence" field is intended to be sufficient to allow detection
   of a reasonable range of packet loss within the delay-bandwidth
   product of expected network connections.

   The "source_id" field is a 32-bit value identifying the node that
   sent the message.  A participant's NORM node identifier (NormNodeId)
   can be set according to application needs but unique identifiers must
   be assigned within a single NormSession.  In some cases, use of the



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 18]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   host IP address or a hash of it can suffice, but alternative
   methodologies for assignment and potential collision resolution of
   node identifiers within a multicast session need to be considered.
   For example, the "source identifier" mechanism defined in the Real-
   Time Protocol (RTP) specification [22] may be applicable to use for
   NORM node identifiers.  At this point in time, the protocol makes no
   assumptions about how these unique identifiers are actually assigned.

   NORM Header Extensions

   When header extensions are applied, they follow the message type's
   base header and precede any payload portion.  There are two formats
   for header extensions, both of which begin with an 8-bit "het"
   (header extension type) field.  One format is provided for variable-
   length extensions with "het" values in the range from 0 through 127.
   The other format is for fixed length (one 32-bit word) extensions
   with "het" values in the range from 128 through 255.  These formats
   are given here:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   het <=127   |      hel      |                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+                               |
   |                    Header Extension Content                   |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

               NORM Variable Length Header Extension Format

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   het >=128   |    reserved   |    Header Extension Content   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
            NORM Fixed Length (32-bit) Header Extension Format

   The "Header Extension Content" portion of these header extension
   format is defined for each header extension type defined for NORM
   messages.  Some header extensions are defined within this document
   for NORM baseline FEC and congestion control operations.

4.2.  Sender Messages

   NORM sender messages include the NORM_DATA type, the NORM_INFO type,
   and the NORM_CMD type.  NORM_DATA and NORM_INFO messages contain
   application data content while NORM_CMD messages are used for various
   protocol control functions.



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 19]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


4.2.1.  NORM_DATA Message

   The NORM_DATA message is expected to be the predominant type
   transmitted by NORM senders.  These messages are used to encapsulate
   segmented data content for objects of type NORM_OBJECT_DATA,
   NORM_OBJECT_FILE, and NORM_OBJECT_STREAM.  NORM_DATA messages may
   contain original or FEC-encoded application data content.

   The format of NORM_DATA messages is comprised of three logical
   portions: 1) a fixed-format NORM_DATA header portion, 2) a FEC
   Payload ID portion with a format dependent upon the FEC encoding
   used, and 3) a payload portion containing source or encoded
   application data content.  Note for objects of type
   NORM_OBJECT_STREAM, the payload portion contains additional fields
   used to appropriately recover stream content.  NORM implementations
   MAY also extend the NORM_DATA header to include a FEC Object
   Transmission Information (EXT_FTI) header extension.  This allows
   NORM receivers to automatically allocate resources and properly
   perform FEC decoding without the need for pre-configuration or out-
   of-band information.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |version| type=2|    hdr_len    |          sequence             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           source_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |          instance_id          |     grtt      |backoff| gsize |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     flags     |    fec_id     |     object_transport_id       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                         fec_payload_id                        |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                header_extensions (if applicable)              |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |          payload_len*         |       payload_msg_start*      |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                        payload_offset*                        |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                          payload_data*                        |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                         NORM_DATA Message Format




Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 20]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   *IMPORTANT NOTE:  The "payload_len", "payload_msg_start" and
   "payload_offset" fields are present only for objects of type
   NORM_OBJECT_STREAM.

   The "payload_len" and "payload_offset" fields allow senders to
   arbitrarily vary the size of NORM_DATA payload segments for streams.
   This allows applications to flush transmitted streams as needed to
   meet unique streaming requirements.  For objects of types
   NORM_OBJECT_FILE and NORM_OBJECT_DATA, these fields are unnecessary
   since the receiver can calculate the payload length and offset
   information from the "fec_payload_id" using the block partioning
   algorithm described in the FEC Building Block document [4].  The
   "payload_len" field indicates the length (in bytes) of the
   "payload_data" content of the stream data segment.  When
   "payload_len" is equal to ZERO, this indicates that there is no
   "payload_data" content and the "payload_msg_start" field is instead
   to be interpreted as a stream control code.

   The "payload_msg_start" field serves one of two exlusive purposes.
   When "payload_len" is a non-zero value, the "payload_msg_start"
   fields is used to mark the location (within the "payload_data") field
   of the start byte of an application-defined message boundary.  Note
   that the "payload_msg_start" value is the byte offset of the message
   boundary plus one.  Thus, a value of "payload_msg_start" equal to
   ZERO denotes that no message boundary is present, while a
   "payload_msg_start" value of ONE indicates the message boundary is
   aligned with the beginning of the "payload_data" field.  This allows
   NORM receiver applications to "synchronize" with NORM senders and to
   be able to properly interpret application layer data when joining a
   NORM session already in progress.  The NORM sender implementation
   SHOULD provide a mechanism for the application to mark such message
   boundaries and set the "payload_msg_start" value accordingly.  The
   "payload_msg_start" value will always be less than or equal to the
   "payload_len" value except for the special case of "payload_len = 0",
   that indicates the "payload_msg_start" field should be interpreted as
   a "stream control code" (See description below).

   The "payload_len" and "payload_offset" fields allow senders to
   arbitrarily vary the size of NORM_DATA payload segments for streams.
   This allows applications to flush transmitted streams as needed to
   meet unique streaming requirements.  For objects of types
   NORM_OBJECT_FILE and NORM_OBJECT_DATA, these fields are unnecessary
   since the receiver can calculate the payload length and offset
   information from the "fec_payload_id" using the block partioning
   algorithm described in the FEC Building Block document [4].  When
   systematic FEC codes (e.g., "fec_id" = 129) are used, the
   "payload_len", "payload_msg_start", and "payload_offset" fields
   contain actual payload_data length, start index (or stream control



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 21]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   code), and offset values for the associated application stream data
   segment (the "payload_data" field content) for those NORM_DATA
   messages containing source data symbols.  In NORM_DATA messages that
   contain parity information, these fields do not contain values that
   can be directly interpreted, but instead are values computed from FEC
   encoding the "payload_len", "payload_msg_start", and "payload_offset"
   fields for the source data segments of the corresponding coding
   block.

   The "version", "type", "hdr_len", "sequence", and "source_id" fields
   form the NORM Common Message Header as described in Section 4.1.  The
   value of the NORM_DATA "type" field is 2.  The NORM_DATA _base_
   "hdr_len" value is 4 (32-bit words) plus the size of the
   "fec_payload_id" field.  The "fec_payload_id" field size depends upon
   the FEC encoding used for the referenced NormObject.  The "fec_id"
   field is used to indicate the FEC coding type.  For example, when
   small block, systematic codes are used, a "fec_id" value of 129 is
   indicated and the size of the "fec_payload_id" is two 32-bit words.
   In this case the NORM_DATA base "hdr_len" value is 6.  The cumulative
   size of any header extensions applied is added into the "hdr_len"
   field.

   The "instance_id" field contains a value generated by the sender to
   uniquely identify its current instance of participation in the
   NormSession.  This allows receivers to detect when senders have
   perhaps left and rejoined a session in progress.  When a sender
   (identified by its "source_id") is detected to have a new
   "instance_id", the NORM receivers SHOULD drop their previous state on
   the sender and begin reception anew, or at least treat this
   "instance" as a new, separate sender.

   The "grtt" field contains a non-linear quantized representation of
   the sender's current estimate of group round-trip time (GRTT) (this
   is also referred to as R_max in [24]).  This value is used to control
   timing of the NACK repair process and other aspects of protocol
   operation as described in this document.  Normally, the advertised
   "grtt" value will correspond to what the sender has measured based on
   feedback from the group, but, at low transmission rates, the
   advertised "grtt" SHALL be set to MAX(grttMeasured,
   NormSegmentSize/senderRate) where the "NormSegmentSize" is sender's
   segment size in bytes and the "senderRate" is the sender's current
   transmission rate in bytes per second.  The algorithm for encoding
   and decoding this field is described in the RMT NORM Building Block
   document [3].

   The "backoff" field value is used by receivers to determine the
   maximum backoff timer value used in the timer-based NORM NACK
   feedback suppression.  This 4-bit field supports values from 0-15



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 22]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   which is multiplied by the sender GRTT to determine the maximum
   backoff timeout.  The "backoff" field informs the receiver set of the
   sender's backoff factor parameter "Ksender".  Recommended values and
   their use are described in the NORM receiver NACK procedure
   description in Section 5.3.  The "gsize" field contains a
   representation of the sender's current estimate of group size.  This
   4-bit field can roughly represent values from ten to 500 million
   where the most significant bit value of 0 or 1 represents a mantissa
   of 1 or 5, respectively and the three least significant bits
   incremented by one represent a base 10 exponent (order of magnitude).
   For examples, a field value of "0x0" represents 1.0e+01 (10), a value
   of "0x8" represents 5.0e+01 (50), a value of "0x1" represents 1.0e+02
   (100), and a value of "0xf" represents 5.0e+08.  For NORM feedback
   suppression purposes, the group size does not need to be represented
   with a high degree of precision.  The group size may even be
   estimated somewhat conservatively (i.e., overestimated) to maintain
   low levels of feedback traffic.  A default group size estimate of
   10,000 ("gsize" = 0x3) is recommended for general purpose reliable
   multicast applications using the NORM protocol.
































Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 23]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   The "flags" field contains a number of different binary flags
   providing information and hints regarding how the receiver should
   handle the identified object.  Defined flags in this field include:


+---------------------+-------+----------------------------------------+
|        Flag         | Value |                Purpose                 |
+---------------------+-------+----------------------------------------+
|NORM_FLAG_REPAIR     | 0x01  | Indicates message is a repair          |
|                     |       | transmission                           |
+---------------------+-------+----------------------------------------+
|NORM_FLAG_EXPLICIT   | 0x02  | Indicates a repair segment intended to |
|                     |       | meet a specific receiver erasure, as   |
|                     |       | compared to parity segments provided   |
|                     |       | by the sender for general purpose      |
|                     |       | (with respect to an FEC coding block)  |
|                     |       | erasure filling.                       |
+---------------------+-------+----------------------------------------+
|NORM_FLAG_INFO       | 0x04  | Indicates availability of NORM_INFO    |
|                     |       | for object.                            |
+---------------------+-------+----------------------------------------+
|NORM_FLAG_UNRELIABLE | 0x08  | Indicates that repair transmissions    |
|                     |       | for the specified object will be       |
|                     |       | unavailable (One-shot, best effort     |
|                     |       | transmission).                         |
+---------------------+-------+----------------------------------------+
|NORM_FLAG_FILE       | 0x10  | Indicates object is "file-based" data  |
|                     |       | (hint to use disk storage for          |
|                     |       | reception).                            |
+---------------------+-------+----------------------------------------+
|NORM_FLAG_STREAM     | 0x20  | Indicates object is of type            |
|                     |       | NORM_OBJECT_STREAM.                    |
+---------------------+-------+----------------------------------------+

   NORM_FLAG_REPAIR is set when the associated message is a repair
   transmission.  This information can be used by receivers to help
   observe a join policy where it is desired that newly joining
   receivers only begin participating in the NACK process upon receipt
   of new (non-repair) data content.  NORM_FLAG_EXPLICIT is used to mark
   repair messages sent when the data sender has exhausted its ability
   to provide "fresh" (previously untransmitted) parity segments as
   repair.  This flag could possibly be used by intermediate systems
   implementing functionality to control sub-casting of repair content
   to different legs of a reliable multicast topology with disparate
   repair needs.  NORM_FLAG_INFO is set only when optional NORM_INFO
   content is actually available for the associated object.  Thus,
   receivers will NACK for retransmission of NORM_INFO only when it is
   available for a given object.  NORM_FLAG_UNRELIABLE is set when the



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 24]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   sender wishes to transmit an object with only "best effort" delivery
   and will not supply repair transmissions for the object.  NORM
   receivers SHOULD NOT execute repair requests for objects marked with
   the NORM_FLAG_UNRELIABLE flag.  Note that receivers may inadvertently
   request repair of such objects when all segments (or info content)
   for those objects are not received (i.e., a gap in the
   "object_transport_id" sequence is noted).  In this case, the sender
   should invoke the NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) process as described in Section
   4.2.3.  NORM_FLAG_FILE can be set as a "hint" from the sender that
   the associated object should be stored in non-volatile storage.
   NORM_FLAG_STREAM is set when the identified object is of type
   NORM_OBJECT_STREAM.  The presence of NORM_FLAG_STREAM overrides that
   of NORM_FLAG_FILE with respect to interpretation of object size and
   the format of NORM_DATA messages.

   The "fec_id" field corresponds to the FEC Encoding Identifier
   described in the FEC Building Block document [4].  The "fec_id" value
   implies the format of the "fec_payload_id" field and, coupled with
   FEC Object Transmission Information, the procedures to decode FEC
   encoded content.  Small block, systematic codes ("fec_id" = 129) are
   expected to be used for most NORM purposes and the NORM_OBJECT_STREAM
   requires systematic FEC codes for most efficient performance.

   The "object_transport_id" field is a monotonically and incrementally
   increasing value assigned by the sender to NormObjects being
   transmitted.  Transmissions and repair requests related to that
   object use the same "object_transport_id" value.  For sessions of
   very long or indefinite duration, the "object_transport_id" field may
   be repeated, but it is presumed that the 16-bit field size provides
   an adequate enough sequence space to avoid object confusion amongst
   receivers and sources (i.e., receivers SHOULD re-synchronize with a
   server when receiving object sequence identifiers sufficiently out-
   of-range with the current state kept for a given source).  During the
   course of its transmission within a NORM session, an object is
   uniquely identified by the concatenation of the sender "source_id"
   and the given "object_transport_id".  Note that NORM_INFO messages
   associated with the identified object carry the same
   "object_transport_id" value.

   The "fec_payload_id" identifies the attached NORM_DATA "payload"
   content.  The size and format of the "fec_payload_id" field depends
   upon the FEC type indicated by the "fec_id" field.  These formats are
   given in the descriptions of specific FEC schemes as described in the
   IETF FEC Basic Schemes document [25]. or additional FEC Scheme
   documents that may be defined.  As an example, the format of the
   "fec_payload_id" format for Small Block, Systematic codes ("fec_id" =
   129) is given here:




Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 25]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                       source_block_number                     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |        source_block_len       |      encoding_symbol_id       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

          Example FEC Payload ID Field ("fec_payload_id") Format
            for Small Block, Systematic Codes ("fec_id" = 129)

   In this example FEC payload identifier, the "source_block_number",
   "source_block_len", and "encoding_symbol_id" fields correspond to the
   "Source Block Number", "Source Block Length, and "Encoding Symbol ID"
   fields of the FEC Payload ID format given by the FEC Basic Schemes
   document [25]. for the Small Block Systematic FEC Scheme identified
   by a "fec_id" value of 129.  The "source_block_number" identifies the
   coding block's relative position with a NormObject.  Note that, for
   NormObjects of type NORM_OBJECT_STREAM, the "source_block_number" may
   wrap for very long lived sessions.  The "source_block_len" indicates
   the number of user data segments in the identified coding block.
   Given the "source_block_len" information of how many symbols of
   application data are contained in the block, the receiver can
   determine whether the attached segment is data or parity content and
   treat it appropriately.  Some applications may dynamically "shorten"
   code blocks when the pending information content is not predictable
   (e.g. real-time message streams).  In that case, the
   "source_block_len" value given for an "encoding_symbol_id" that
   contains FEC parity content SHALL take precedence over the
   "source_block_len" value provided for any packets containing source
   symbols. Also, the "source_block_len" value given for an ordinally
   higher "encoding_symbol_id" SHALL take precedence over the
   "source_block_len" given for prior encoding symbols.  The reason for
   this is that the sender may only know the maximum source block length
   at the time is transmitting source symbols, but then subsequently
   "shorten" the code and then provide that last source symbol and/or
   encoding symbols with FEC parity content.  The "encoding_symbol_id"
   identifies which specific symbol (segment) within the coding block
   the attached payload conveys.  Depending upon the value of the
   "encoding_symbol_id" and the associated "source_block_len" parameters
   for the block, the symbol (segment) referenced may be a user data or
   an FEC parity segment.  For systematic codes, encoding symbols
   numbered less than the source_block_len contain original application
   data while segments greater than or equal to source_block_len contain
   parity symbols calculated for the block.  The concatenation of
   object_transport_id::fec_payload_id can be viewed as a unique
   transport protocol data unit identifier for the attached segment with
   respect to the NORM sender's instance within a session.



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 26]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   Additional FEC Object Transmission Information (as described in the
   FEC Building Block document [4]) is required to properly receive and
   decode NORM transport objects.  This information MAY be provided as
   out-of-band session information.  However, in some cases, it may be
   useful for the sender to include this information "in-band" to
   facilitate receiver operation with minimal preconfiguration.  For
   this purpose, the NORM FEC Object Transmission Information Header
   Extension (EXT_FTI) is defined.  This header extension MAY be applied
   to NORM_DATA and NORM_INFO messages to provide this necessary
   information.  The format of the EXT_FTI consists of two parts, a
   general part that contains the size of the associated transport
   object and a portion that depends upon the FEC scheme being used.
   The "fec_id" field in NORM_DATA and NORM_INFO messages identifies the
   FEC scheme.  The format of the EXT_FTI  general part is given here.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    het = 64   |    hel = 4    |       object_size (msb)       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                       object_size (lsb)                       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                  FEC Scheme specific content ...              |

      FEC Object Transmission Information Header Extension (EXT_FTI)

   The header extension type "het" field value for the EXT_FTI header
   extension is 64.  The header extension length "hel" value depends
   upon the format of the FTI for FEC code type identified by the
   "fec_id" field.

   The 48-bit "object_size" field indicates the total length of the
   object (in bytes) for the static object types of NORM_OBJECT_FILE and
   NORM_OBJECT_DATA.  This information is used by receivers to determine
   storage requirements and/or allocate storage for the received object.
   Receivers with insufficient storage capability may wish to forego
   reliable reception (i.e., not NACK for) of the indicated object.  In
   the case of objects of type NORM_OBJECT_STREAM, the "object_size"
   field is used by the sender to advertise the size of its stream
   buffer to the receiver group.  In turn, the receivers SHOULD use this
   information to allocate a stream buffer for reception of
   corresponding size.

   As noted, the format of the extension depends upon the FEC code in
   use, but in general it SHOULD contain any required details on the FEC
   code in use (e.g., FEC Instance ID, etc.).  As an example, the format
   of the EXT_FTI for small block systematic codes ("fec_id" = 129) is
   given here:



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 27]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    het = 64   |    hel = 4    |       object_size (msb)       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                       object_size (lsb)                       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |       fec_instance_id         |          segment_size         |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |       fec_max_block_len       |         fec_num_parity        |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

       Example FEC Object Transmission Information Header Extension
       (EXT_FTI) for Small Block, Systematic Codes ("fec_id" = 129)

   In this example (for "fec_id" = 129), the "hel" field value is 4.
   The size of the EXT_FTI header extension may be different for other
   FEC schemes.

   The 48-bit "object_size" serves the purpose described previously.

   The "fec_instance_id" corresponds to the "FEC Instance ID" described
   in the FEC Building Block document [4].  In this case, the
   "fec_instance_id" is a value corresponding to the particular type of
   Small Block Systematic Code being used (e.g., Reed-Solomon GF(2^8),
   Reed-Solomon GF(2^16), etc).  The standardized assignment of FEC
   Instance ID values is described in [4].  The "segment_size" field
   indicates the sender's current setting for maximum message payload
   content (in bytes).  This allows receivers to allocate appropriate
   buffering resources and to determine other information in order to
   properly process received data messaging.  Typically, FEC parity
   symbol segments will be of this size.

   The "fec_max_block_len" indicates the current maximum number of user
   data segments per FEC coding block to be used by the sender during
   the session.  This allows receivers to allocate appropriate buffer
   space for buffering blocks transmitted by the sender.

   The "fec_num_parity" corresponds to the "maximum number of encoding
   symbols that can be generated for any source block" as described in
   for FEC Object Transmission Information for Small Block Systematic
   Codes in the FEC Building Block document [4].  For example, Reed-
   Solomon codes may be arbitrarily shortened to create different code
   variations for a given block length.  In the case of Reed-Solomon
   (GF(2^8) and GF(2^16)) codes, this value indicates the maximum number
   of parity segments available from the sender for the coding blocks.
   This field MAY be interpreted differently for other systematic codes
   as they are defined.



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 28]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   The payload portion of NORM_DATA messages includes source data or FEC
   encoded application content.  Again, the content of this payload
   depends upon the FEC scheme being employed.  Additionally, support
   for streaming using the NORM_OBJECT_STREAM type, necessitates some
   additional content in the payload.

   The "payload_len", "payload_msg_start", and "payload_offset" fields
   are present ONLY for transport objects of type NORM_OBJECT_STREAM.
   For senders employing systematic FEC encoding, these fields contain
   values that can be interpreted directly for NORM_DATA messages
   containing original application source data content.  But, for
   NORM_DATA messages containing calculated parity content, these fields
   will contain values computed by FEC encoding of the
   "payload_msg_start", "payload_len" and "payload_offset" values of the
   NORM_DATA data segments for the corresponding FEC coding block and
   cannot be interpreted directly.  The actual "payload_msg_start",
   "payload_len" and "payload_offset" values of missing data content can
   be determined upon decoding a FEC coding block.  Note that these
   fields do NOT contribute to the value of the NORM_DATA "hdr_len"
   field.  These fields are present only when the "flags" portion of the
   NORM_DATA message indicate the transport object is of type
   NORM_OBJECT_STREAM.

   The "payload_len" value, when non-zero, indicates the size, in bytes,
   of the source content contained in the "payload_data" field.  If the
   "payload_len" value is equal to ZERO, this indicates that the
   "payload_msg_start" field should be alternatively interpreted as a
   stream control code.  The only stream control code currently defined
   is NORM_STREAM_END = 0.  This code indicates that the sender is
   terminating transmission of stream content at the corresponding
   position in the stream and the receiver should not expect content (or
   NACK for any content) following that position in the stream.  Future
   versions of this specification may define additional stream control
   codes if necessary.

   When the "payload_len" value is non-zero, the "payload_msg_start"
   field, when it is set to a non-zero value, indicates that the
   associated "payload_data" content contains an application-defined
   message boundary (start-of-message).  When such a message boundary is
   indicated, the first byte of an application-defined message, with
   respect to the "payload_data" field, will be found at an offset of
   "payload_msg_start - 1" bytes.  Thus, if a NORM_OBJECT_STREAM
   NORM_DATA payload contains the start of an application message at the
   first byte of the "payload_data" field, the value of the
   "payload_msg_start" field will be '1'.  Again, if the value of the
   "payload_msg_start" field is ZERO, no message boundary is indicated.
   It is RECOMMENDED that NORM implementations provide sender stream
   applications with a capability to mark message boundaries in this



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 29]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   manner.  Similarly, the NORM receiver SHOULD enable the application
   to recover such message boundary information.  This enables NORM
   receivers to "synchronize" with transmitted message stream content in
   a meaningful way (i.e., meaningful to the application) at any time,
   whether joining the session late, or departing the session and
   returning.

   and "payload_offset" fields indicate the size and relative position
   (within the stream) of the source content contained in the
   "payload_data" field.  Note that for long-lived streams, the
   "payload_offset" field may wrap.

   The "payload_data" field contains the original application source or
   parity content for the symbol identified by the "fec_payload_id".
   The length of this field SHALL be limited to a maximum of the
   sender's NormSegmentSize bytes as given in the FTI for the object.
   Note the length of this field for messages containing parity content
   will always be of length NormSegmentSize.  When encoding data
   segments of varying sizes, the FEC encoder SHALL assume ZERO value
   padding for data segments with length less than the NormSegmentSize.
   It is RECOMMENDED that a sender's NormSegmentSize generally be
   constant for the duration of a given sender's term of participation
   in the session, but may possibly vary on a per-object basis.  The
   NormSegmentSize is expected to be configurable by the sender
   application prior to session participation as needed for network
   topology maximum transmission unit (MTU) considerations.  For IPv6,
   MTU discovery may be possibly leveraged at session startup to perform
   this configuration.  The "payload_data" content may be delivered
   directly to the application for source symbols (when systematic FEC
   encoding is used) or upon decoding of the FEC block.  For
   NORM_OBJECT_FILE and NORM_OBJECT_STREAM objects, the data segment
   length and offset can be calculated using the block paritioning
   algorithm described in the FEC Building Block document [4].  For
   NORM_OBJECT_STREAM objects, the length and offset is obtained from
   the segment's corresponding "payload_len" and "payload_offset"
   fields.

4.2.2.  NORM_INFO Message

   The NORM_INFO message is used to convey OPTIONAL, application-
   defined, "out-of-band" context information for transmitted
   NormObjects.  An example NORM_INFO use for bulk file transfer is to
   place MIME type information for the associated file, data, or stream
   object into the NORM_INFO payload.  Receivers may use the NORM_INFO
   content to make a decision as whether to participate in reliable
   reception of the associated object.  Each NormObject can have an
   independent unit of NORM_INFO associated with it.  NORM_DATA messages
   contain a flag to indicate the availability of NORM_INFO for a given



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 30]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   NormObject.  NORM receivers may NACK for retransmission of NORM_INFO
   when they have not received it for a given NormObject.  The size of
   the NORM_INFO content is limited to that of a single NormSegmentSize
   for the given sender.  This atomic nature allows the NORM_INFO to be
   rapidly and efficiently repaired within the NORM reliable
   transmission process.

   When NORM_INFO content is available for a NormObject, the
   NORM_FLAG_INFO flag SHALL be set in NORM_DATA messages for the
   corresponding "object_transport_id" and the NORM_INFO message shall
   be transmitted as the first message for the NormObject.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |version| type=1|    hdr_len    |          sequence             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           source_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |          instance_id          |     grtt      |backoff| gsize |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     flags     |     fec_id    |     object_transport_id       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                header_extensions (if applicable)              |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                         payload_data                          |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                         NORM_INFO Message Format

   The "version", "type", "hdr_len", "sequence", and "source_id" fields
   form the NORM Common Message Header as described in Section 4.1.  The
   value of "hdr_len" field when no header extensions are present is 4.

   The "instance_id", "grtt", "backoff", "gsize", "flags", "fec_id", and
   "object_transport_id" fields carry the same information and serve the
   same purpose as with NORM_DATA messages.  These values allow the
   receiver to prepare appropriate buffering, etc, for further
   transmissions from the sender when NORM_INFO is the first message
   received.

   As with NORM_DATA messages, the NORM FTI Header Extension (EXT_FTI)
   may be optionally applied to NORM_INFO messages.  To conserve
   protocol overhead, some NORM implementations may wish to apply the
   EXT_FTI when used to NORM_INFO messages only and not to NORM_DATA
   messages.



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 31]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   The NORM_INFO "payload_data" field contains sender application-
   defined content which can be used by receiver applications for
   various purposes as described above.

4.2.3.  NORM_CMD Messages

   NORM_CMD messages are transmitted by senders to perform a number of
   different protocol functions.  This includes functions such as round-
   trip timing collection, congestion control functions, synchronization
   of sender/receiver repair "windows", and notification of sender
   status.  A core set of NORM_CMD messages is enumerated.
   Additionally, a range of command types remain available for potential
   application-specific use.  Some NORM_CMD types may have dynamic
   content attached.  Any attached content will be limited to maximum
   length of the sender NormSegmentSize to retain the atomic nature of
   commands.  All NORM_CMD messages begin with a common set of fields,
   after the usual NORM message common header.  The standard NORM_CMD
   fields are:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |version| type=3|    hdr_len    |          sequence             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           source_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |          instance_id          |     grtt      |backoff| gsize |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     flavor    |                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+        NORM_CMD Content                       +
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                         NORM_CMD Standard Fields

   The "version", "type", "hdr_len", "sequence", and "source_id" fields
   form the NORM Common Message Header as described in Section 4.1.  The
   value of the "hdr_len" field for NORM_CMD messages without header
   extensions present depends upon the "flavor" field.

   The "instance_id", "grtt", "backoff", and "gsize" fields provide the
   same information and serve the same purpose as with NORM_DATA and
   NORM_INFO messages.  The "flavor" field indicates the type of command
   to follow.  The remainder of the NORM_CMD message is dependent upon
   the command type ("flavor").  NORM command flavors include:






Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 32]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


  +----------------------+--------+----------------------------------+
  |       Command        | Flavor |            Purpose               |
  +----------------------+--------+----------------------------------+
  |NORM_CMD(FLUSH)       |   1    | Used to indicate sender          |
  |                      |        | temporary end-of-transmission.   |
  |                      |        | (Assists in robustly initiating  |
  |                      |        | outstanding repair requests from |
  |                      |        | receivers).  May also be         |
  |                      |        | optionally used to collect       |
  |                      |        | positive acknowledgment of       |
  |                      |        | reliable reception from subset   |
  |                      |        | of receivers.                    |
  +----------------------+--------+----------------------------------+
  |NORM_CMD(EOT)         |   2    | Used to indicate sender          |
  |                      |        | permanent end-of-transmission.   |
  +----------------------+--------+----------------------------------+
  |NORM_CMD(SQUELCH)     |   3    | Used to advertise sender's       |
  |                      |        | current repair window in         |
  |                      |        | response to out-of-range NACKs   |
  |                      |        | from receivers.                  |
  +----------------------+--------+----------------------------------+
  |NORM_CMD(CC)          |   4    | Used for GRTT measurement and    |
  |                      |        | collection of congestion control |
  |                      |        | feedback.                        |
  +----------------------+--------+----------------------------------+
  |NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV)  |   5    | Used to advertise sender's       |
  |                      |        | aggregated repair/feedback state |
  |                      |        | for suppression of unicast       |
  |                      |        | feedback from receivers.         |
  +----------------------+--------+----------------------------------+
  |NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ)     |   6    | Used to request application-     |
  |                      |        | defined positive acknowledgment  |
  |                      |        | from a list of receivers         |
  |                      |        | (OPTIONAL).                      |
  +----------------------+--------+----------------------------------+
  |NORM_CMD(APPLICATION) |   7    | Used for application-defined     |
  |                      |        | purposes which may need to       |
  |                      |        | temporarily preempt data         |
  |                      |        | transmission (OPTIONAL).         |
  +----------------------+--------+----------------------------------+


4.2.3.1.  NORM_CMD(FLUSH) Message

   The NORM_CMD(FLUSH) command is sent when the sender reaches the end
   of all data content and pending repairs it has queued for
   transmission.  This may indicate a temporary or permanent end of data
   transmission, but the sender is still willing to respond to repair



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 33]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   requests.  This command is repeated once per 2*GRTT to excite the
   receiver set for any outstanding repair requests up to and including
   the transmission point indicated within the NORM_CMD(FLUSH) message.
   The number of repeats is equal to NORM_ROBUST_FACTOR unless a list of
   receivers from which explicit positive acknowledgment is expected
   ("acking_node_list") is given.  In that case, the "acking_node_list"
   is updated as acknowledgments are received and the NORM_CMD(FLUSH) is
   repeated according to the mechanism described in Section 5.5.3.  The
   greater the NORM_ROBUST_FACTOR, the greater the probability that all
   applicable receivers will be excited for acknowledgment or repair
   requests (NACKs) _and_ that the corresponding NACKs are delivered to
   the sender.  A default value of NORM_ROBUST_FACTOR equal to 20 is
   RECOMMENDED.  If a NORM_NACK message interrupts the flush process,
   the sender SHALL re-initiate the flush process after any resulting
   repair transmissions are completed.

   Note that receivers also employ a timeout mechanism to self-initiate
   NACKing (if there are outstanding repair needs) when no messages of
   any type are received from a sender.  This inactivity timeout is
   related to the NORM_CMD(FLUSH) and NORM_ROBUST_FACTOR and is
   specified in Section 5.3.  Receivers SHALL self-initiate the NACK
   repair process when the inactivity has expired for a specific sender
   and the receiver has pending repairs needed from that sender.  With a
   sufficiently large NORM_ROBUST_FACTOR value, data content is
   delivered with a high assurance of reliability.  The penalty of a
   large NORM_ROBUST_FACTOR value is the potential transmission of
   excess NORM_CMD(FLUSH) messages and a longer inactivity timeout for
   receivers to self-initiate a terminal NACK process.

   For finite-size transport objects such as NORM_OBJECT_DATA and
   NORM_OBJECT_FILE, the flush process (if there are no further pending
   objects) occurs at the end of these objects.  Thus, FEC repair
   information is always available for repairs in response to repair
   requests elicited by the flush command.  However, for
   NORM_OBJECT_STREAM, the flush may occur at any time, including in the
   middle of an FEC coding block if systematic FEC codes are employed.
   In this case, the sender will not yet be able to provide FEC parity
   content for the concurrent coding block and will be limited to
   explicitly repairing the stream with source data content for that
   block.  Applications that anticipate frequent flushing of stream
   content SHOULD be judicious in the selection of the FEC coding block
   size (i.e., do not use a very large coding block size if frequent
   flushing occurs).  For example, a reliable multicast application
   transmitting an on-going series of intermittent, relatively small
   messages will need to trade-off using the NORM_OBJECT_DATA paradigm
   versus the NORM_OBJECT_STREAM paradigm with an appropriate FEC coding
   block size.  This is analogous to application trade-offs for other
   transport protocols such as the selection of different TCP modes of



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 34]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   operation such as "no delay", etc.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |version| type=3|    hdr_len    |          sequence             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           source_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |          instance_id          |     grtt      |backoff| gsize |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   flavor = 1  |    fec_id     |      object_transport_id      |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                         fec_payload_id                        |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                acking_node_list (if applicable)               |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                      NORM_CMD(FLUSH) Message Format

   The "version", "type", "hdr_len", "sequence", and "source_id" fields
   form the NORM Common Message Header as described in Section 4.1.  In
   addition to the NORM common message header and standard NORM_CMD
   fields, the NORM_CMD(FLUSH) message contains fields to identify the
   current status and logical transmit position of the sender.

   The "fec_id" field indicates the FEC type used for the flushing
   "object_transport_id" and implies the size and format of the
   "fec_payload_id" field.  Note the "hdr_len" value for the
   NORM_CMD(FLUSH) message is 4 plus the size of the "fec_payload_id"
   field when no header extensions are present.

   The "object_transport_id" and "fec_payload_id" fields indicate the
   sender's current logical "transmit position".  These fields are
   interpreted in the same manner as in the NORM_DATA message type.
   Upon receipt of the NORM_CMD(FLUSH), receivers are expected to check
   their completion state _through_ (including) this transmission
   position.  If receivers have outstanding repair needs in this range,
   they SHALL initiate the NORM NACK Repair Process as described in
   Section 5.3.  If receivers have no outstanding repair needs, no
   response to the NORM_CMD(FLUSH) is generated.

   For NORM_OBJECT_STREAM objects using systematic FEC codes, receivers
   MUST request "explicit-only" repair of the identified
   "source_block_number" if the given "encoding_symbol_id" is less than
   the "source_block_len".  This condition indicates the sender has not



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 35]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   yet completed encoding the corresponding FEC block and parity content
   is not yet available.  An "explicit-only" repair request consists of
   NACK content for the applicable "source_block_number" which does not
   include any requests for parity-based repair.  This allows NORM
   sender applications to "flush" an ongoing stream of transmission when
   needed, even if in the middle of an FEC block.  Once the sender
   resumes stream transmission and passes the end of the pending coding
   block, subsequent NACKs from receivers SHALL request parity-based
   repair as usual.  Note that the use of a systematic FEC code is
   assumed here.  It should also be noted that a sender has the option
   of arbitrarily shortening a given code block when such an application
   "flush" occurs.  In this case, the receiver will request explicit
   repair, but the sender MAY provide FEC-based repair (parity segments)
   in response.  These parity segments MUST contain the corrected
   "source_block_len" for the shortened block and that
   "source_block_len" associated with segments containing parity content
   SHALL overrride the previously advertised "source_block_len".
   Similarly, the "source_block_len" associated with the highest ordinal
   "encoding_symbol_id" shall take precedence over prior symbols when a
   difference (e.g., due to code shortening at the sender) occurs.
   Normal receiver NACK initiation and construction is discussed in
   detail in Section 5.3.  The OPTIONAL "acking_node_list" field
   contains a list of NormNodeIds for receivers from which the sender is
   requesting explicit positive acknowledgment of reception up through
   the transmission point identified by the "object_transport_id" and
   "fec_payload_id" fields.  The length of the list can be inferred from
   the length of the received NORM_CMD(FLUSH) message.  When the
   "acking_node_list" is present, the lightweight positive
   acknowledgment process described in Section 5.5.3 SHALL be observed.


4.2.3.2.  NORM_CMD(EOT) Message

   The NORM_CMD(EOT) command is sent when the sender reaches permanent
   end-of-transmission with respect to the NormSession and will not
   respond to further repair requests.  This allows receivers to
   gracefully reach closure of operation with this sender (without
   requiring any timeout) and free any resources that are no longer
   needed.  The NORM_CMD(EOT) command SHOULD be sent with the same
   robust mechanism as used for NORM_CMD(FLUSH) commands to provide a
   high assurance of reception by the receiver set.










Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 36]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |version| type=3|    hdr_len    |          sequence             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           source_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |          instance_id          |     grtt      |backoff| gsize |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   flavor = 2  |                    reserved                   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                       NORM_CMD(EOT) Message Format

   The value of the "hdr_len" field for NORM_CMD(EOT) messages without
   header extensions present is 4.  The "reserved" field is reserved for
   future use and MUST be set to an all ZERO value.  Receivers MUST
   ignore the "reserved" field.


4.2.3.3.  NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) Message

   The NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) command is transmitted in response to outdated
   or invalid NORM_NACK content received by the sender.  Invalid
   NORM_NACK content consists of repair requests for NormObjects for
   which the sender is unable or unwilling to provide repair.  This
   includes repair requests for outdated objects, aborted objects, or
   those objects which the sender previously transmitted marked with the
   NORM_FLAG_UNRELIABLE flag.  This command indicates to receivers what
   content is available for repair, thus serving as a description of the
   sender's current "repair window".  Receivers SHALL not generate
   repair requests for content identified as invalid by a
   NORM_CMD(SQUELCH).

   The NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) command is sent once per 2*GRTT at the most.
   The NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) advertises the current "repair window" of the
   sender by identifying the earliest (lowest) transmission point for
   which it will provide repair, along with an encoded list of objects
   from that point forward that are no longer valid for repair.  This
   mechanism allows the sender application to cancel or abort
   transmission and/or repair of specific previously enqueued objects.
   The list also contains the identifiers for any objects within the
   repair window that were sent with the NORM_FLAG_UNRELIABLE flag set.
   In normal conditions, it is expected the NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) will be
   needed infrequently, and generally only to provide a reference repair
   window for receivers who have fallen "out-of-sync" with the sender
   due to extremely poor network conditions.




Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 37]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   The starting point of the invalid NormObject list begins with the
   lowest invalid NormTransportId greater than the current "repair
   window" start from the invalid NACK(s) that prompted the generation
   of the squelch.  The length of the list is limited by the sender's
   NormSegmentSize.  This allows the receivers to learn the status of
   the sender's applicable object repair window with minimal
   transmission of NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) commands.  The format of the
   NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) message is:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |version| type=3|    hdr_len    |          sequence             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           source_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |          instance_id          |     grtt      |backoff| gsize |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  flavor = 3   |     fec_id    |      object_transport_id      |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                         fec_payload_id                        |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                        invalid_object_list                    |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                     NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) Message Format

   In addition to the NORM common message header and standard NORM_CMD
   fields, the NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) message contains fields to identify the
   earliest logical transmit position of the sender's current repair
   window and an "invalid object list" beginning with the index of the
   logically earliest invalid repair request from the offending NACK
   message which initiated the squelch transmission.  The value of the
   "hdr_len" field when no extensions are present is 4 plus the size of
   the "fec_payload_id" field that is dependent upon the FEC scheme
   identified by the "fec_id" field.

   The "object_transport_id" and "fec_payload_id" fields are
   concatenated to indicate the beginning of the sender's current repair
   window (i.e., the logically earliest point in its transmission
   history for which the sender can provide repair).  The "fec_id" field
   implies the size and format of the "fec_payload_id" field.  This
   serves as an advertisement of a "synchronization point" for receivers
   to request repair.  Note, that while an "encoding_symbol_id" may be
   included in the "fec_payload_id" field, the sender's repair window
   SHOULD be aligned on FEC coding block boundaries and thus the



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 38]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   "encoding_symbol_id" SHOULD be zero.

   The "invalid_object_list" is a list of 16-bit NormTransportIds that,
   although they are within the range of the sender's current repair
   window, are no longer available for repair from the sender.  For
   example, a sender application may dequeue an out-of-date object even
   though it is still within the repair window.  The total size of the
   "invalid_object_list" content is can be determined from the packet's
   payload length and is limited to a maximum of the NormSegmentSize of
   the sender.  Thus, for very large repair windows, it is possible that
   a single NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) message may not be capable of listing the
   entire set of invalid objects in the repair window.  In this case,
   the sender SHALL ensure that the list begins with a NormObjectId that
   is greater than or equal to the lowest ordinal invalid NormObjectId
   from the NACK message(s) that prompted the NORM_CMD(SQUELCH)
   generation.  The NormObjectIds in the "invalid_object_list" MUST be
   greater than the "object_transport_id" marking the beginning of the
   sender's repair window.  This insures convergence of the squelch
   process, even if multiple invalid NACK/ squelch iterations are
   required.  This explicit description of invalid content within the
   sender's current window allows the sender application (most notably
   for discrete "object" based transport) to arbitrarily invalidate
   (i.e., dequeue) portions of enqueued content (e.g., certain objects)
   for which it no longer wishes to provide reliable transport.


4.2.3.4.  NORM_CMD(CC) Message

   The NORM_CMD(CC) messages contains fields to enable sender-to-
   receiver group greatest round-trip time (GRTT) measurement and to
   excite the group for congestion control feedback.  A baseline NORM
   congestion control scheme (NORM-CC), based on the TCP-Friendly
   Multicast Congestion Control (TFMCC) scheme of [5] is described in
   Section 5.5.2 of this document.  The NORM_CMD(CC) message is usually
   transmitted as part of NORM-CC congestion control operation.  A NORM
   header extension is defined below to be used with the NORM_CMD(CC)
   message to support NORM-CC operation.  Different header extensions
   may be defined for the NORM_CMD(CC) (and/or other NORM messages as
   needed) to support alternative congestion control schemes in the
   future.  If NORM is operated in a private network with congestion
   control operation disabled, the NORM_CMD(CC) message is then used for
   GRTT measurement only and may optionally be sent less frequently than
   with congestion control operation.








Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 39]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |version| type=3|    hdr_len    |            sequence           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           source_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |          instance_id          |     grtt      |backoff| gsize |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   flavor = 4  |    reserved   |          cc_sequence          |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                         send_time_sec                         |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                        send_time_usec                         |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |               header extensions (if applicable)               |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                  cc_node_list (if applicable)                 |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                        NORM_CMD(CC) Message Format

   The NORM common message header and standard NORM_CMD fields serve
   their usual purposes.  The value of the "hdr_len" field when no
   header extensions are present is 6.

   The "reserved" field is for potential future use and MUST be set to
   ZERO in this version of the NORM protocol and its baseline NORM-CC
   congestion control scheme.  It may be possible that alternative
   congestion control schemes may use the NORM_CMD(CC) message defined
   here and leverage the "reserved" field for scheme-specific purposes.

   The "cc_sequence" field is a sequence number applied by the sender.
   For NORM-CC operation, it is used to provide functionality equivalent
   to the "feedback round number" (fb_nr)described in [5].  The most
   recently received "cc_sequence" value is recorded by receivers and
   can be fed back to the sender in congestion control feedback
   generated by the receivers for that sender.  The "cc_sequence" number
   can also be used in NORM implementations to assess how recently a
   receiver has received NORM_CMD(CC) probes from the sender.  This can
   be useful instrumentation for complex or experimental multicast
   routing environments.

   The "send_time" field is a timestamp indicating the time that the
   NORM_CMD(CC) message was transmitted.  This consists of a 64-bit
   field containing 32-bits with the time in seconds ("send_time_sec")



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 40]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   and 32-bits with the time in microseconds ("send_time_usec") since
   some reference time the source maintains (usually 00:00:00, 1 January
   1970).  The byte ordering of the fields is "Big Endian" network
   order.  Receivers use this timestamp adjusted by the amount of delay
   from the time they received the NORM_CMD(CC) message to the time of
   their response as the "grtt_response" portion of NORM_ACK and
   NORM_NACK messages generated.  This allows the sender to evaluate
   round-trip times to different receivers for congestion control and
   other (e.g., GRTT determination) purposes.

   To facilitate the baseline NORM-CC scheme described in Section 5.5.2,
   a NORM-CC Rate header extension (EXT_RATE) is defined to inform the
   group of the sender's current transmission rate.  This is used along
   with the loss detection "sequence" field of all NORM sender messages
   and the NORM_CMD(CC) GRTT collection process to support NORM-CC
   congestion control operation.  The format of this header extension is
   as follows:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    het = 128  |    reserved   |           send_rate           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

              NORM-CC Rate Header Extension Format (EXT_RATE)

   The "send_rate" field indicates the sender's current transmission
   rate in bytes per second.  The 16-bit "send_rate" field consists of
   12 bits of mantissa in the most significant portion and 4 bits of
   base 10 integer exponent (E) information in the least significant
   portion.  The 12-bit mantissa portion of the field is scaled such
   that a base 10 mantissa (M) floating point value of 0.0 corresponds
   to 0 and a value of 10.0 corresponds to 4096 in the upper 12 bits of
   the 16-bit "send_rate" field .  Thus:

         send_rate = (((int)(M * 4096.0 / 10.0 + 0.5)) << 4) | E;

   For example, to represent a transmission rate of 256kbps (3.2e+04
   bytes per second), the lower 4 bits of the 16-bit field contain a
   value of 0x04 to represent the exponent (E) while the upper 12 bits
   contain a value of 0x51f (M) as determined from the equation given
   above:

   send_rate = (((int)((3.2 * 4096.0 / 10.0) + 0.5)) << 4) | 4;

             = (0x51f << 4) | 0x4

             = 0x51f4



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 41]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   To decode the "send_rate" field, the following equation can be used:

   value = (send_rate >> 4) * (10/4096) * power(10, (send_rate & x000f))

   Note the maximum transmission rate that can be represented by this
   scheme is approximately 9.99e+15 bytes per second.

   When this extension is present, a "cc_node_list" may be attached as
   the payload of the NORM_CMD(CC) message.  The presence of this header
   extension also implies that NORM receivers should respond according
   to the procedures described in Section 5.5.2.  The "cc_node_list"
   consists of a list of NormNodeIds and their associated congestion
   control status.  This includes the current limiting receiver (CLR)
   node, any potential limiting receiver (PLR) nodes that have been
   identified, and some number of receivers for which congestion control
   status is being provided, most notably including the receivers'
   current RTT measurement.  The maximum length of the "cc_node_list"
   provides for at least the CLR and one other receiver, but may be
   configurable for more timely feedback to the group.  The list length
   can be inferred from the length of the NORM_CMD(CC) message.

   Each item in the "cc_node_list" is in the following format:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                          cc_node_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    cc_flags   |     cc_rtt    |            cc_rate            |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                 Congestion Control Node List Item Format

   The "cc_node_id" is the NormNodeId of the receiver which the item
   represents.

   The "cc_flags" field contains flags indicating the congestion control
   status of the indicated receiver.  The following flags are defined:













Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 42]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


+-------------------+-------+------------------------------------------+
|       Flag        | Value |                 Purpose                  |
+-------------------+-------+------------------------------------------+
|NORM_FLAG_CC_CLR   | 0x01  | Receiver is the current limiting         |
|                   |       | receiver (CLR).                          |
+-------------------+-------+------------------------------------------+
|NORM_FLAG_CC_PLR   | 0x02  | Receiver is a potential limiting         |
|                   |       | receiver (PLR).                          |
+-------------------+-------+------------------------------------------+
|NORM_FLAG_CC_RTT   | 0x04  | Receiver has measured RTT with respect   |
|                   |       | to sender.                               |
+-------------------+-------+------------------------------------------+
|NORM_FLAG_CC_START | 0x08  | Sender/receiver is in "slow start" phase |
|                   |       | of congestion control operation (i.e.,   |
|                   |       | The receiver has not yet detected any    |
|                   |       | packet loss and the "cc_rate" field is   |
|                   |       | the receiver's actual measured receive   |
|                   |       | rate).                                   |
+-------------------+-------+------------------------------------------+
|NORM_FLAG_CC_LEAVE | 0x10  | Receiver is imminently leaving the       |
|                   |       | session and its feedback should not be   |
|                   |       | considered in congestion control         |
|                   |       | operation.                               |
+-------------------+-------+------------------------------------------+

   The "cc_rtt" contains a quantized representation of the RTT as
   measured by the sender with respect to the indicated receiver.  This
   field is valid only if the NORM_FLAG_CC_RTT flag is set in the
   "cc_flags" field.  This one byte field is a quantized representation
   of the RTT using the algorithm described in the NORM Building Block
   document [3].  The "cc_rate" field contains a representation of the
   receiver's current calculated (during steady-state congestion control
   operation) or twice its measured (during the "slow start" phase)
   congestion control rate.  This field is encoded and decoded using the
   same technique as described for the NORM_CMD(CC) "send_rate" field.


4.2.3.5.  NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) Message

   The NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) message is used by the sender to "advertise"
   its aggregated repair state from NORM_NACK messages accumulated
   during a repair cycle and/or congestion control feedback received.
   This message is sent only when the sender has received NORM_NACK
   and/or NORM_ACK(CC) (when congestion control is enabled) messages via
   unicast transmission instead of multicast.  By "echoing" this
   information to the receiver set, suppression of feedback can be
   achieved even when receivers are unicasting that feedback instead of
   multicasting it among the group [17].



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 43]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |version| type=3|    hdr_len    |          sequence             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           source_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |          instance_id          |     grtt      |backoff| gsize |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  flavor = 5   |     flags     |            reserved           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |               header extensions (if applicable)               |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                       repair_adv_payload                      |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                    NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) Message Format

   The "instance_id", "grtt", "backoff", "gsize", and "flavor" fields
   serve the same purpose as in other NORM_CMD messages.  The value of
   the "hdr_len" field when no extensions are present is 4.

   The "flags" field provide information on the NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV)
   content.  There is currently one NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) flag defined:

                     NORM_REPAIR_ADV_FLAG_LIMIT = 0x01

   This flag is set by the sender when it is unable to fit its full
   current repair state into a single NormSegmentSize.  If this flag is
   set, receivers should limit their NACK response to generating NACK
   content only up through the maximum ordinal transmission position
   (objectId::fecPayloadId) included in the "repair_adv_content".

   When congestion control operation is enabled, a header extension may
   be applied to the NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) representing the most limiting
   (in terms of congestion control feedback suppression) congestion
   control response.  This allows the NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) message to
   suppress receiver congestion control responses as well as NACK
   feedback messages.  The field is defined as a header extension so
   that alternative congestion control schemes may be used with NORM
   without revision to this document.  A NORM-CC Feedback Header
   Extension (EXT_CC) is defined to encapsulate congestion control
   feedback within NORM_NACK, NORM_ACK, and NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV)
   messages.  If another congestion control technique (e.g., Pragmatic
   General Multicast Congestion Control (PGMCC) [26]) is used within a
   NORM implementation, an additional header extension MAY need to be



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 44]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   defined encapsulate any required feedback content.  The NORM-CC
   Feedback Header Extension format is:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     het = 3   |    hel = 3    |          cc_sequence          |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    cc_flags   |     cc_rtt    |            cc_loss            |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |            cc_rate            |          cc_reserved          |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

             NORM-CC Feedback Header Extension (EXT_CC) Format

   The "cc_sequence" field contains the current greatest "cc_sequence"
   value receivers have received in NORM_CMD(CC) messages from the
   sender.  This information assists the sender in congestion control
   operation by providing an indicator of how current ("fresh") the
   receiver's round-trip measurement reference time is and whether the
   receiver has been successfully receiving recent congestion control
   probes.  For example, if it is apparent the receiver has not been
   receiving recent congestion control probes (and thus possibly other
   messages from the sender), the sender may choose to take congestion
   avoidance measures.  For NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) messages, the sender
   SHALL set the "cc_sequence" field value to the value set in the last
   NORM_CMD(CC) message sent.

   The "cc_flags" field contains bits representing the receiver's state
   with respect to congestion control operation.  The possible values
   for the "cc_flags" field are those specified for the NORM_CMD(CC)
   message node list item flags.  These fields are used by receivers in
   controlling (suppressing as necessary) their congestion control
   feedback.  For NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) messages, the NORM_FLAG_CC_RTT
   should be set only when all feedback messages received by the sender
   have the flag set.  Similarly, the NORM_FLAG_CC_CLR or
   NORM_FLAG_CC_PLR should be set only when no feedback has been
   received from non-CLR or non-PLR receivers.  And the
   NORM_FLAG_CC_LEAVE should be set only when all feedback messages the
   sender has received have this flag set.  These heuristics for setting
   the flags in NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) ensure the most effective
   suppression of receivers providing unicast feedback messages.

   The "cc_rtt" field SHALL be set to a default maximum value and the
   NORM_FLAG_CC_RTT flag SHALL be cleared when no receiver has yet
   received RTT measurement information.  When a receiver has received
   RTT measurement information, it shall set the "cc_rtt" value
   accordingly and set the NORM_FLAG_CC_RTT flag in the "cc_flags"



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 45]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   field.  For NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) messages, the sender SHALL set the
   "cc_rtt" field value to the largest non-CLR/non-PLR RTT it has
   measured from receivers for the current feedback round.

   The "cc_loss" field represents the receiver's current packet loss
   fraction estimate for the indicated source.  The loss fraction is a
   value from 0.0 to 1.0 corresponding to a range of zero to 100 percent
   packet loss.  The 16-bit "cc_loss" value is calculated by the
   following formula:

                "cc_loss" = decimal_loss_fraction * 65535.0

   For NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) messages, the sender SHALL set the "cc_loss"
   field value to the largest non-CLR/non-PLR loss estimate it has
   received from receivers for the current feedback round.

   The "cc_rate" field represents the receivers current local congestion
   control rate.  During "slow start", when the receiver has detected no
   loss, this value is set to twice the actual rate it has measured from
   the corresponding sender and the NORM_FLAG_CC_START is set in the
   "cc_flags' field.  Otherwise, the receiver calculates a congestion
   control rate based on its loss measurement and RTT measurement
   information (even if default) for the "cc_rate" field.  For
   NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) messages, the sender SHALL set the "cc_loss"
   field value to the lowest non-CLR/non-PLR "cc_rate" report it has
   received from receivers for the current feedback round.

   The "cc_reserved" field is reserved for future NORM protocol use.
   Currently, senders SHALL set this field to ZERO, and receivers SHALL
   ignore the content of this field.

   The "repair_adv_payload" is in exactly the same form as the
   "nack_content" of NORM_NACK messages and can be processed by
   receivers for suppression purposes in the same manner, with the
   exception of the condition when the NORM_REPAIR_ADV_FLAG_LIMIT is
   set.


4.2.3.6.  NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) Message

   The NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) message is used by the sender to request
   acknowledgment from a specified list of receivers.  This message is
   used in providing a lightweight positive acknowledgment mechanism
   that is OPTIONAL for use by the reliable multicast application.  A
   range of acknowledgment request types is provided for use at the
   application's discretion.  Provision for application-defined,
   positively-acknowledged commands allows the application to
   automatically take advantage of transmission and round-trip timing



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 46]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   information available to the NORM protocol.  The details of the NORM
   positive acknowledgment process including transmission of the
   NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) messages and the receiver response (NORM_ACK) are
   described in Section 5.5.3.  The format of the NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ)
   message is:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |version| type=3|    hdr_len    |          sequence             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           source_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |          instance_id          |     grtt      |backoff| gsize |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  flavor = 6   |    reserved   |    ack_type   |    ack_id     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                       acking_node_list                        |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                     NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) Message Format

   The NORM common message header and standard NORM_CMD fields serve
   their usual purposes.  The value of the "hdr_len" field for
   NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) messages with no header extension present is 4.

























Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 47]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   The "ack_type" field indicates the type of acknowledgment being
   requested and thus implies rules for how the receiver will treat this
   request.  The following "ack_type" values are defined and are also
   used in NORM_ACK messages described later:


   +---------------------+--------+----------------------------------+
   |      ACK Type       | Value  |            Purpose               |
   +---------------------+--------+----------------------------------+
   |NORM_ACK_CC          |      1 | Used to identify NORM_ACK        |
   |                     |        | messages sent in response to     |
   |                     |        | NORM_CMD(CC) messages.           |
   +---------------------+--------+----------------------------------+
   |NORM_ACK_FLUSH       |      2 | Used to identify NORM_ACK        |
   |                     |        | messages sent in response to     |
   |                     |        | NORM_CMD(FLUSH) messages.        |
   +---------------------+--------+----------------------------------+
   |NORM_ACK_RESERVED    |   3-15 | Reserved for possible future     |
   |                     |        | NORM protocol use.               |
   +---------------------+--------+----------------------------------+
   |NORM_ACK_APPLICATION | 16-255 | Used at application's            |
   |                     |        | discretion.                      |
   +---------------------+--------+----------------------------------+

   The NORM_ACK_CC value is provided for use only in NORM_ACKs generated
   in response to the NORM_CMD(CC) messages used in congestion control
   operation.  Similarly, the NORM_ACK_FLUSH is provided for use only in
   NORM_ACKs generated in response to applicable NORM_CMD(FLUSH)
   messages.  NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) messages with "ack_type" of NORM_ACK_CC
   or NORM_ACK_FLUSH SHALL NOT be generated by the sender.

   The NORM_ACK_RESERVED range of "ack_type" values is provided for
   possible future NORM protocol use.

   The NORM_ACK_APPLICATION range of "ack_type" values is provided so
   that NORM applications may implement application-defined, positively-
   acknowledged commands that are able to leverage internal transmission
   and round-trip timing information available to the NORM protocol
   implementation.

   The "ack_id" provides a sequenced identifier for the given
   NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) message.  This "ack_id" is returned in NORM_ACK
   messages generated by the receivers so that the sender may associate
   the response with its corresponding request.

   The "reserved" field is reserved for possible future protocol use and
   SHALL be set to ZERO by senders and ignored by receivers.




Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 48]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   The "acking_node_list" field contains the NormNodeIds of the current
   NORM receivers that are desired to provide positive acknowledge
   (NORM_ACK) to this request.  The packet payload length implies the
   length of the "acking_node_list" and its length is limited to the
   sender NormSegmentSize.  The individual NormNodeId items are listed
   in network (Big Endian) byte order.  If a receiver's NormNodeId is
   included in the "acking_node_list", it SHALL schedule transmission of
   a NORM_ACK message as described in Section 5.5.3.

4.2.3.7.  NORM_CMD(APPLICATION) Message

   This command allows the NORM application to robustly transmit
   application-defined commands.  The command message preempts any
   ongoing data transmission and is repeated up to NORM_ROBUST_FACTOR
   times at a rate of once per 2*GRTT.  This rate of repetition allows
   the application to observe any response (if that is the application's
   purpose for the command) before it is repeated.  Possible responses
   may include initiation of data transmission, other
   NORM_CMD(APPLICATION) messages, or even application-defined,
   positively-acknowledge commands from other NormSession participants.
   The transmission of these commands will preempt data transmission
   when they are scheduled and may be multiplexed with ongoing data
   transmission.  This type of robustly transmitted command allows NORM
   applications to define a complete set of session control mechanisms
   with less state than the transfer of FEC encoded reliable content
   requires while taking advantage of NORM transmission and round-trip
   timing information.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |version| type=3|    hdr_len    |          sequence             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           source_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |          instance_id          |     grtt      |backoff| gsize |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  flavor = 7   |                    reserved                   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                   Application-Defined Content                 |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                   NORM_CMD(APPLICATION) Message Format

   The NORM common message header and NORM_CMD fields are interpreted as
   previously described.  The value of the NORM_CMD(APPLICATION)
   "hdr_len" field when no header extensions are present is 4.



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 49]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   The "Application-Defined Content" area contains information in a
   format at the discretion of the application.  The size of this
   payload SHALL be limited to a maximum of the sender's NormSegmentSize
   setting.

4.3.  Receiver Messages

   The NORM message types generated by participating receivers consist
   of NORM_NACK and NORM_ACK message types.  NORM_NACK messages are sent
   to request repair of missing data content from sender transmission
   and NORM_ACK messages are generated in response to certain sender
   commands including NORM_CMD(CC) and NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ).

4.3.1.  NORM_NACK Message

   The principal purpose of NORM_NACK messages is for receivers to
   request repair of sender content via selective, negative
   acknowledgment upon detection of incomplete data.  NORM_NACK messages
   will be transmitted according to the rules of NORM_NACK generation
   and suppression described in Section 5.3.  NORM_NACK messages also
   contain additional fields to provide feedback to the sender(s) for
   purposes of round-trip timing collection and congestion control.

   The payload of NORM_NACK messages contains one or more repair
   requests for different objects or portions of those objects.  The
   NORM_NACK message format is as follows:

























Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 50]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |version| type=4|    hdr_len    |            sequence           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           source_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           server_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |           instance_id         |            reserved           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                       grtt_response_sec                       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                       grtt_response_usec                      |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |               header extensions (if applicable)               |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                          nack_payload                         |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                         NORM_NACK Message Format

   The NORM common message header fields serve their usual purposes.
   The value of the "hdr_len" field for NORM_NACK messages without
   header extensions present is 6.

   The "server_id" field identifies the NORM sender to which the
   NORM_NACK message is destined.

   The "instance_id" field contains the current session identifier given
   by the sender identified by the "server_id" field in its sender
   messages.  The sender SHOULD ignore feedback messages which contain
   an invalid "instance_id" value.

   The "grtt_response" fields contain an adjusted version of the
   timestamp from the most recently received NORM_CMD(CC) message for
   the indicated NORM sender.  The format of the "grtt_response" is the
   same as the "send_time" field of the NORM_CMD(CC).  The
   "grtt_response" value is _relative_ to the "send_time" the source
   provided with a corresponding NORM_CMD(CC) command.  The receiver
   adjusts the source's NORM_CMD(CC) "send_time" timestamp by adding the
   time delta from when the receiver received the NORM_CMD(CC) to when
   the NORM_NACK is transmitted in response to calculate the value in
   the "grtt_response" field.  This is the "receive_to_response_delta"
   value used in the following formula:




Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 51]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


    grtt_response = NORM_CMD(CC) send_time + receive_to_response_delta

   The receiver SHALL set the "grtt_response" to a ZERO value, to
   indicate that it has not yet received a NORM_CMD(CC) message from the
   indicated sender and that the sender should ignore the
   "grtt_response" in this message.

   For NORM-CC operation, the NORM-CC Feedback Header Extension, as
   described in the NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV} message description, is added
   to NORM_NACK messages to provide feedback on the receivers current
   state with respect to congestion control operation.  Note that
   alternative header extensions for congestion control feedback may be
   defined for alternative congestion control schemes for NORM use in
   the future.

   The "reserved" field is for potential future NORM  use and SHALL be
   set to ZERO for this version of the protocol.

   The "nack_content" of the NORM_NACK message specifies the repair
   needs of the receiver with respect to the NORM sender indicated by
   the "server_id" field.  The receiver constructs repair requests based
   on the NORM_DATA and/or NORM_INFO segments it requires from the
   sender in order to complete reliable reception up to the sender's
   transmission position at the moment the receiver initiates the NACK
   Procedure as described in Section 5.3.  A single NORM Repair Request
   consists of a list of items, ranges, and/or FEC coding block erasure
   counts for needed NORM_DATA and/or NORM_INFO content.  Multiple
   repair requests may be concatenated within the "nack_payload" field
   of a NORM_NACK message.  Note that a single NORM Repair Request can
   possibly include multiple "items", "ranges", or "erasure_counts".  In
   turn, the "nack_payload" field may contain multiple repair requests.
   A single NORM Repair Request has the following format:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |      form     |     flags     |             length            |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                      repair_request_items                     |
   |                             ...                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                        NORM Repair Request Format








Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 52]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   The "form" field indicates the type of repair request items given in
   the "repair_request_items" list.  Possible values for the "form"
   field include:


                              Form          Value
                       NORM_NACK_ITEMS        1
                       NORM_NACK_RANGES       2
                       NORM_NACK_ERASURES     3


   A "form" value of NORM_NACK_ITEMS indicates each repair request item
   in the "repair_request_items" list is to be treated as an individual
   request.  A value of NORM_NACK_RANGES indicates that the
   "repair_request_items" list consists of pairs of repair request items
   that correspond to inclusive ranges of repair needs.  And the
   NORM_NACK_ERASURES "form" indicates that the repair request items are
   to be treated individually and that the "encoding_symbol_id" portion
   of the "fec_payload_id" field of the repair request item (see below)
   is to be interpreted as an "erasure count" for the FEC coding block
   identified by the repair request item's "source_block_number".

   The "flags" field is currently used to indicate the level of data
   content for which the repair request items apply (i.e., an individual
   segment, entire FEC coding block, or entire transport object).
   Possible flag values include:


 +------------------+-------+------------------------------------------+
 |      Flag        | Value |                 Purpose                  |
 +------------------+-------+------------------------------------------+
 |NORM_NACK_SEGMENT | 0x01  | Indicates the listed segment(s) or range |
 |                  |       | of segments are required as repair.      |
 +------------------+-------+------------------------------------------+
 |NORM_NACK_BLOCK   | 0x02  | Indicates the listed block(s) or range   |
 |                  |       | of blocks in entirety are required as    |
 |                  |       | repair.                                  |
 +------------------+-------+------------------------------------------+
 |NORM_NACK_INFO    | 0x04  | Indicates that NORM_INFO is required as  |
 |                  |       | repair for the listed object(s).         |
 +------------------+-------+------------------------------------------+
 |NORM_NACK_OBJECT  | 0x08  | Indicates the listed object(s) or range  |
 |                  |       | of objects in entirety are required as   |
 |                  |       | repair.                                  |
 +------------------+-------+------------------------------------------+

   When the NORM_NACK_SEGMENT flag is set, the "object_transport_id" and
   "fec_payload_id" fields are used to determine which sets or ranges of



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 53]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   individual NORM_DATA segments are needed to repair content at the
   receiver.  When the NORM_NACK_BLOCK flag is set, this indicates the
   receiver is completely missing the indicated coding block(s) and
   requires transmissions sufficient to repair the indicated block(s) in
   their entirety.  When the NORM_NACK_INFO flag is set, this indicates
   the receiver is missing the NORM_INFO segment for the indicated
   "object_transport_id".  Note the NORM_NACK_INFO may be set in
   combination with the NORM_NACK_BLOCK or NORM_NACK_SEGMENT flags, or
   may be set alone.  When the NORM_NACK_OBJECT flag is set, this
   indicates the receiver is missing the entire NormTransportObject
   referenced by the "object_transport_id".  This also implicitly
   requests any available NORM_INFO for the NormObject, if applicable.
   The "fec_payload_id" field is ignored when the flag NORM_NACK_OBJECT
   is set.

   The "length" field value is the length in bytes of the
   "repair_request_items" field.

   The "repair_request_items" field consists of a list of individual or
   range pairs of transport data unit identifiers in the following
   format.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     fec_id    |   reserved    |      object_transport_id      |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                        fec_payload_id                         |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                      NORM Repair Request Item Format

   The "fec_id" indicates the FEC type and can be used to determine the
   format of the "fec_payload_id" field.  The "reserved" field is kept
   for possible future use and SHALL be set to a ZERO value and ignored
   by NORM nodes processing NACK content.

   The "object_transport_id" corresponds to the NormObject for which
   repair is being requested and the "fec_payload_id" identifies the
   specific FEC coding block and/or segment being requested.  When the
   NORM_NACK_OBJECT flag is set, the value of the "fec_payload_id" field
   is ignored.  When the NORM_NACK_BLOCK flag is set, only the FEC code
   block identifier portion of the "fec_payload_id" is to be
   interpreted.

   The format of the "fec_payload_id" field depends upon the "fec_id"
   field value.



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 54]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   When the receiver's repair needs dictate that different forms (mixed
   ranges and/or individual items) or types (mixed specific segments
   and/or blocks or objects in entirety) are required to complete
   reliable transmission, multiple NORM Repair Requests with different
   "form" and or "flags" values can be concatenated within a single
   NORM_NACK message.  Additionally, NORM receivers SHALL construct
   NORM_NACK messages with their repair requests in ordinal order with
   respect to "object_transport_id" and "fec_payload_id" values.  The
   "nack_payload" size SHALL NOT exceed the NormSegmentSize for the
   sender to which the NORM_NACK is destined.

   NORM_NACK Content Examples:

   In these examples, a small block, systematic FEC code ("fec_id" =
   129) is assumed with a user data block length of 32 segments.  In
   Example 1, a list of individual NORM_NACK_ITEMS repair requests is
   given.  In Example 2, a list of NORM_NACK_RANGES requests _and_ a
   single NORM_NACK_ITEMS request are concatenated to illustrate the
   possible content of a NORM_NACK message.  Note that FEC coding block
   erasure counts could also be provided in each case.  However, the
   erasure counts are not really necessary since the sender can easily
   determine the erasure count while processing the NACK content.
   However, the erasure count option may be useful for operation with
   other FEC codes or for intermediate system purposes.



























Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 55]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   Example 1:  NORM_NACK "nack_payload" for: Object 12, Coding Block 3,
   Segments 2,5,8
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   form = 1    | flags = 0x01  |       length  = 36            |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  fec_id = 129 |   reserved    |    object_transport_id = 12   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                    source_block_number = 3                    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    source_block_length = 32   |    encoding_symbol_id = 2     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  fec_id = 129 |   reserved    |    object_transport_id = 12   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                    source_block_number = 3                    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    source_block_length = 32   |    encoding_symbol_id = 5     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  fec_id = 129 |   reserved    |    object_transport_id = 12   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                    source_block_number = 3                    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    source_block_length = 32   |    encoding_symbol_id = 8     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


























Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 56]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   Example 2:  NORM_NACK "nack_payload" for: Object 18 Coding Block 6,
   Segments 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; and Object 19 NORM_INFO and Coding Block
   1, segment 3
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   form = 2    | flags = 0x01  |       length  = 24            |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  fec_id = 129 |   reserved    |    object_transport_id = 18   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                    source_block_number = 6                    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    source_block_length = 32   |    encoding_symbol_id = 5     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  fec_id = 129 |   reserved    |    object_transport_id = 18   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                    source_block_number = 6                    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    source_block_length = 32   |    encoding_symbol_id = 10    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   form = 1    | flags = 0x05  |       length  = 12            |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  fec_id = 129 |   reserved    |    object_transport_id = 19   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                    source_block_number = 1                    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    source_block_length = 32   |    encoding_symbol_id = 3     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

4.3.2.  NORM_ACK Message

   The NORM_ACK message is intended to be used primarily as part of NORM
   congestion control operation and round-trip timing measurement.  As
   mentioned in the NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) message description, the
   acknowledgment type NORM_ACK_CC is provided for this purpose.  The
   generation of NORM_ACK(CC) messages for round-trip timing estimation
   and congestion-control operation is described in Sections 5.5.1 and
   5.5.2, respectively.  However, some multicast applications may
   benefit from some limited form of positive acknowledgment for certain
   functions.  A simple, scalable positive acknowledgment scheme is
   defined in Section 5.5.3 that can be leveraged by protocol
   implementations when appropriate.  The NORM_CMD(FLUSH) may be used
   for OPTIONAL collection of positive acknowledgment of reliable
   reception to a certain "watermark" transmission point from specific
   receivers using this mechanism.  The NORM_ACK type NORM_ACK_FLUSH is
   provided for this purpose and the format of the "nack_payload" for
   this acknowledgment type is given below.  Beyond that, a range of
   application-defined "ack_type" values is provided for use at the NORM



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 57]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   application's discretion.  Implementations making use of application-
   defined positive acknowledgments may also make use the "nack_payload"
   as needed, observing the constraint that the "nack_payload" field
   size be limited to a maximum of the NormSegmentSize for the sender to
   which the NORM_ACK is destined.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |version| type=5|    hdr_len    |          sequence             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           source_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           server_id                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |           instance_id         |    ack_type  |     ack_id     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                       grtt_response_sec                       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                       grtt_response_usec                      |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |               header extensions (if applicable)               |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                   ack_payload (if applicable)                 |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                          NORM_ACK Message Format

   The NORM common message header fields serve their usual purposes.
   The value of the "hdr_len" field when no header extensions are
   present is 6.

   The "server_id", "instance_id",  and "grtt_response" fields serve the
   same purpose as the corresponding fields in NORM_NACK messages.  And
   header extensions may be applied to support congestion control
   feedback or other functions in the same manner.

   The "ack_type" field indicates the nature of the NORM_ACK message.
   This directly corresponds to the "ack_type" field of the
   NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) message to which this acknowledgment applies.

   The "ack_id" field serves as a sequence number so that the sender can
   verify that a NORM_ACK message received actually applies to a current
   acknowledgment request.  The "ack_id" field is not used in the case
   of the NORM_ACK_CC and NORM_ACK_FLUSH acknowledgment types.




Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 58]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   The "ack_payload" format is a function of the "ack_type".   The
   NORM_ACK_CC message has no attached content.  Only the NORM_ACK
   header applies.  In the case of NORM_ACK_FLUSH, a specific
   "ack_payload" format is defined:


    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     fec_id    |   reserved    |      object_transport_id      |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                        fec_payload_id                         |
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                    NORM_ACK_FLUSH "ack_payload" Format

   The "object_transport_id" and "fec_payload_id" are used by the
   receiver to acknowledge applicable NORM_CMD(FLUSH) messages
   transmitted by the sender identified by the "server_id" field.

   The "ack_payload" of NORM_ACK messages for application-defined
   "ack_type" values is specific to the application but is limited in
   size to a maximum the NormSegmentSize of the sender referenced by the
   "server_id".

4.4.  General Purpose Messages

   Some additional message formats are defined for general purpose in
   NORM multicast sessions whether the participant is acting as a sender
   and/or receiver within the group.

4.4.1.  NORM_REPORT Message

   This is an optional message generated by NORM participants.  This
   message could be used for periodic performance reports from receivers
   in experimental NORM implementations.  The format of this message is
   currently undefined.  Experimental NORM implementations may define
   NORM_REPORT formats as needed for test purposes.  These report
   messages SHOULD be disabled for interoperability testing between
   different NORM implementations.

5.  Detailed Protocol Operation

   This section describes the detailed interactions of senders and
   receivers participating in a NORM session.  A simple synopsis of
   protocol operation is given here:




Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 59]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


1)   The sender periodically transmits NORM_CMD(CC) messages as
     needed to initialize and collect roundtrip timing and
     congestion control feedback from the receiver set.

2)   The sender transmits an ordinal set of NormObjects segmented
     in the form of NORM_DATA messages labeled with
     NormTransportIds and logically identified with FEC encoding
     block numbers and symbol identifiers.  NORM_INFO messages
     may optionally precede the transmission of data content for
     NORM transport objects.

3)   As receivers detect missing content from the sender, they
     initiate repair requests with NORM_NACK messages.  Note the
     receivers track the sender's most recent
     objectId::fecPayloadId transmit position and NACK _only_ for
     content ordinally prior to that transmit position.  The
     receivers schedule random backoff timeouts before generating
     NORM_NACK messages and wait an appropriate amount of time
     before repeating the NORM_NACK if their repair request is
     not satisfied.

4)   The sender aggregates repair requests from the receivers and
     logically "rewinds" its transmit position to send
     appropriate repair messages.  The sender sends repairs for
     the earliest ordinal transmit position first and maintains
     this ordinal repair transmission sequence.  Previously
     untransmitted FEC parity content for the applicable FEC
     coding block is used for repair transmissions to the
     greatest extent possible.  If the sender exhausts its
     available FEC parity content on multiple repair cycles for
     the same coding block, it resorts to an explicit repair
     strategy (possibly using parity content) to complete
     repairs.  (The use of explicit repair is expected to be an
     exception in general protocol operation, but the possibility
     does exist for extreme conditions).  The sender immediately
     assumes transmission of new content once it has sent pending
     repairs.

5)   The sender transmits NORM_CMD(FLUSH) messages when it
     reaches the end of enqueued transmit content and pending
     repairs.  Receivers respond to the NORM_CMD(FLUSH) messages
     with NORM_NACK transmissions (following the same suppression
     backoff timeout strategy as for data) if they require
     further repair.







Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 60]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


6)   The sender transmissions are subject to rate control limits
     determined by congestion control mechanisms.  In the
     baseline NORM-CC operation, each sender in a NormSession
     maintains its own independent congestion control state.
     Receivers provide congestion control feedback in NORM_NACK
     and NORM_ACK messages.  NORM_ACK feedback for congestion
     control purposes is governed using a suppression mechanism
     similar to that for NORM_NACK messages.


   While this overall concept is relatively simple, there are details to
   each of these aspects that need to be addressed for successful,
   efficient, robust, and scalable NORM protocol operation.

5.1.  Sender Initialization and Transmission

   Upon startup, the NORM sender immediately begins sending NORM_CMD(CC)
   messages to collect round trip timing and other information from the
   potential group.  If NORM-CC congestion control operation is enabled,
   the NORM-CC Rate header extension MUST be included in these messages.
   Congestion control operation SHALL be observed at all times when
   operating in the general Internet.  Even if congestion control
   operation is disabled at the sender, it may be desirable to use the
   NORM_CMD(CC) messaging to collect feedback from the group using the
   baseline NORM-CC feedback mechanisms.  This proactive feedback
   collection can be used to establish a GRTT estimate prior to data
   transmission and potential NACK operation.

   In some cases, applications may wish for the sender to also proceed
   with data transmission immediately.  In other cases, the sender may
   wish to defer data transmission until it has received some feedback
   or request from the receiver set indicating that receivers are indeed
   present.  Note, in some applications (e.g., web push), this
   indication may come out-of-band with respect to the multicast session
   via other means.  As noted, the periodic transmission of NORM_CMD(CC)
   messages may precede actual data transmission in order to have an
   initial GRTT estimate.

   With inclusion of the OPTIONAL NORM FEC Object Transmission
   Information Header Extension (EXT_FTI), the NORM protocol sender
   message headers can contain all information necessary to prepare
   receivers for subsequent reliable reception.  This includes FEC
   coding parameters, the sender NormSegmentSize, and other information.
   If this header extension is not used, it is presumed that receivers
   have received the FEC Object Transmission Information via other
   means.   Additionally, applications may leverage the use of NORM_INFO
   messages associated with the session data objects in the session to
   provide application-specific context information for the session and



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 61]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   data being transmitted.  These mechanisms allow for operation with
   minimal pre-coordination among the senders and receivers.

   The NORM sender begins segmenting application-enqueued data into
   NORM_DATA segments and transmitting it to the group.  For objects of
   type NORM_OBJECT_DATA and NORM_OBJECT_FILE, the segmentation
   algorithm described in FEC Building Block document.  [4].  is
   RECOMMENDED.  For objects of type NORM_OBJECT_STREAM, segmentation
   will typically be done into uniform FEC coding block sizes, with
   individual segment sizes controlled by the application, although in
   many cases, the application and NORM implementation should strive to
   produce full-sized (NormSegmentSize) segments when possible.  The
   rate of transmission is controlled via congestion control mechanisms
   or is a fixed rate if desired for closed network operations.  The
   receivers participating in the multicast group provide feedback to
   the sender as needed.  When the sender reaches the end of data it has
   enqueued for transmission or any pending repairs, it transmits a
   series of NORM_CMD(FLUSH) messages at a rate of one per 2*GRTT.
   Receivers may respond to these NORM_CMD(FLUSH) messages with
   additional repair requests.  A protocol parameter
   "NORM_ROBUST_FACTOR" determines the number of flush messages sent.
   If receivers request repair, the repair is provided and flushing
   occurs again at the end of repair transmission.  The sender may
   attach an OPTIONAL "acking_node_list" to NORM_CMD(FLUSH) containing
   the NormNodeIds for receivers from which it expects explicit positive
   acknowledgment of reception.  The NORM_CMD(FLUSH) message may be also
   used for this optional function any time prior to the end of data
   enqueued for transmission with the NORM_CMD(FLUSH) messages
   multiplexed with ongoing data transmissions.  The OPTIONAL NORM
   positive acknowledgment procedure is described in Section 5.5.3.

5.1.1.  Object Segmentation Algorithm

   NORM senders and receivers MUST use a common algorithm for logically
   segmenting transport data into FEC encoding blocks and symbols so
   that appropriate NACKs can be constructed to request repair of
   missing data.  NORM FEC coding blocks are comprised of multi-byte
   symbols (segments) that are transmitted in the payload of NORM_DATA
   messages.  Each NORM_DATA message will contain one or more source or
   encoding symbol(s) identified by the "fec_payload_id" field and the
   NormSegmentSize sender parameter defines the maximum size (in bytes)
   of the "payload_data" field containing the content (a "segment").
   The FEC encoding type and associated parameters govern the source
   block size (number of source symbols per coding block, etc.).  NORM
   senders and receivers use these FEC parameters, along with the
   NormSegmentSize and transport object size to compute the source block
   structure for transport objects.  These parameters are provided in
   the FEC Object Transmission Information for each object.  The block



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 62]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   partioning algorithm described in the FEC Building Block document [4]
    is RECOMMENDED for use to compute a source block structure such that
   all source blocks are as close to being equal length as possible.
   This helps avoid the performance disadvantages of "short" FEC blocks.
   Note this algorithm applies only to the statically-sized
   NORM_OBJECT_DATA and NORM_OBJECT_FILE transport object types where
   the object size is fixed and predetermined.  For NORM_OBJECT_STREAM
   objects, the object is segmented according to the maximum source
   block length given in the FEC Transmission Information, unless the
   FEC Payload ID indicates an alternative size for a given block.

5.2.  Receiver Initialization and Reception

   The NORM protocol is designed such that receivers may join and leave
   the group at will.  However, some applications may be constrained
   such that receivers need to be members of the group prior to start of
   data transmission.  NORM applications may use different policies to
   constrain the impact of new receivers joining the group in the middle
   of a session.  For example, a useful implementation policy is for new
   receivers joining the group to limit or avoid repair requests for
   transport objects already in progress.  The NORM sender
   implementation may wish to impose additional constraints to limit the
   ability of receivers to disrupt reliable multicast performance by
   joining, leaving, and rejoining the group often.  Different receiver
   "join policies" may be appropriate for different applications and/or
   scenarios.  For general purpose operation, a default policy where
   receivers are allowed to request repair only for coding blocks with a
   NormTransportId and FEC coding block number greater than or equal to
   the first non-repair NORM_DATA or NORM_INFO message received upon
   joining the group is RECOMMENDED.  For objects of type
   NORM_OBJECT_STREAM it is RECOMMENDED that the join policy constrain
   receivers to start reliable reception at the current FEC coding block
   for which non-repair content is received.

   For typical operation, it is expected that NORM receivers will join a
   specified multicast group and/or listen on an specific port number
   for sender transmissions.  As the NORM receiver receives NORM_DATA
   messages it will provide content to its application as appropriate.













Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 63]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


5.3.  Receiver NACK Procedure

   When the receiver detects it is missing data from a sender's NORM
   transmissions, it initiates its NACKing procedure.  The NACKing
   procedure SHALL be initiated _only_ at FEC coding block boundaries,
   NormObject boundaries, upon receipt of a NORM_CMD(FLUSH) message, or
   upon an "inactivity" timeout when NORM_DATA or NORM_INFO
   transmissions are no longer received from a previously active sender.
   The RECOMMENDED value of such an inactivity timeout is:
            T_inactivity = NORM_ROBUST_FACTOR * 2 * GRTTSender

   where the "GRTTsender" value corresponds to the GRTT estimate
   advertised in the "grtt" field of NORM sender messages.  A minimum
   "T_inactivity" value of 1 second is RECOMMENDED.  The NORM receiver
   SHOULD reset this inactivity timer and repeat NACK initiation upon
   timeout for up to NORM_ROBUST_FACTOR times or more depending upon the
   application's need for persistence by its receivers.  It is also
   important that receivers rescale the "T_inactivity" timeout as the
   sender's advertised GRTT changes.

   The NACKing procedure begins with a random backoff timeout.  The
   duration of the backoff timeout is chosen using the "RandomBackoff"
   algorithm described in the NORM Building Block document [3] using
   (Ksender*GRTTsender) for the "maxTime" parameter and the sender
   advertised group size (GSIZEsender) as the "groupSize" parameter.
   NORM senders provide values for GRTTsender, Ksender and GSIZEsender
   via the "grtt", "backoff", and "gsize" fields of transmitted
   messages.  The GRTTsender value is determined by the sender based on
   feedback it has received from the group while the Ksender and
   GSIZEsender values may determined by application requirements and
   expectations or ancillary information.  The backoff factor "Ksender"
   MUST be greater than one to provide for effective feedback
   suppression.  A value of K = 4 is RECOMMENDED for the Any Source
   Multicast (ASM) model while a value of K = 6 is RECOMMENDED for
   Single Source Multicast (SSM) operation.

   Thus:

        T_backoff = RandomBackoff(Ksender*GRTTsender, GSIZEsender)

   To avoid the possibility of NACK implosion in the case of sender or
   network failure during SSM operation, the receiver SHALL
   automatically suppress its NACK and immediately enter the "holdoff"
   period described below when T_backoff is greater than
   (Ksender-1)*GRTTsender.  Otherwise, the backoff period is entered and
   the receiver MUST accumulate external pending repair state from
   NORM_NACK messages and NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) messages received.  At
   the end of the backoff time, the receiver SHALL generate a NORM_NACK



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 64]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   message only if the following conditions are met:


   1)   The sender's current transmit position (in terms of
        objectId::fecPayloadId) exceeds the earliest repair position
        of the receiver.

   2)   The repair state accumulated from NORM_NACK and
        NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) messages do not equal or supersede the
        receiver's repair needs up to the sender transmission
        position at the time the NACK procedure (backoff timeout)
        was initiated.


   If these conditions are met, the receiver immediately generates a
   NORM_NACK message when the backoff timeout expires.  Otherwise, the
   receiver's NACK is considered to be "suppressed" and the message is
   not sent.  At this time, the receiver begins a "holdoff" period
   during which it constrains itself to not reinitiate the NACKing
   process.  The purpose of this timeout is to allow the sender worst-
   case time to respond to the repair needs before the receiver requests
   repair again.  The value of this "holdoff" timeout  (T_rcvrHoldoff)
   as described in [3] is:

                   T_rcvrHoldoff =(Ksender+2)*GRTTsender

   The NORM_NACK message contains repair request content beginning with
   lowest ordinal repair position of the receiver up through the coding
   block prior to the most recently heard ordinal transmission position
   for the sender.  If the size of the NORM_NACK content exceeds the
   sender's NormSegmentSize, the NACK content is truncated so that the
   receiver only generates a single NORM_NACK message per NACK cycle for
   a given sender.  In summary, a single NACK message is generated
   containing the receiver's lowest ordinal repair needs.

   For each partially-received FEC coding block requiring repair, the
   receiver SHALL, on its _first_ repair attempt for the block, request
   the parity portion of the FEC coding block beginning with the lowest
   ordinal _parity_ "encoding_symbol_id" (i.e., "encoding_symbol_id" =
   "source_block_len") and request the number of FEC symbols
   corresponding to its data segment erasure count for the block.  On
   _subsequent_ repair cycles for the same coding block, the receiver
   SHALL request only those repair symbols from the first set it has not
   yet received up to the remaining erasure count for that applicable
   coding block.  Note that the sender may have provided other
   different, additional parity segments for other receivers that could
   also be used to satisfy the local receiver's erasure-filling needs.
   In the case where the erasure count for a partially-received FEC



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 65]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   coding block exceeds the maximum number of parity symbols available
   from the sender for the block (as indicated by the NORM_DATA
   "fec_num_parity" field), the receiver SHALL request all available
   parity segments plus the ordinally highest missing data segments
   required to satisfy its total erasure needs for the block.  The goal
   of this strategy is for the overall receiver set to request a lowest
   common denominator set of repair symbols for a given FEC coding
   block.  This allows the sender to construct the most efficient repair
   transmission segment set and enables effective NACK suppression among
   the receivers even with uncorrelated packet loss.  This approach also
   requires no synchronization among the receiver set in their repair
   requests for the sender.

   For FEC coding blocks or NormObjects missed in their entirety, the
   NORM receiver constructs repair requests with NORM_NACK_BLOCK or
   NORM_NACK_OBJECT flags set as appropriate.  The request for
   retransmission of NORM_INFO is accomplished by setting the
   NORM_NACK_INFO flag in a corresponding repair request.

5.4.  Sender NACK Processing and Response

   The principle goal of the sender is to make forward progress in the
   transmission of data its application has enqueued.  However, the
   sender must occasionally "rewind" its logical transmission point to
   satisfy the repair needs of receivers who have NACKed.  Aggregation
   of multiple NACKs is used to determine an optimal repair strategy
   when a NACK event occurs.  Since receivers initiate the NACK process
   on coding block or object boundaries, there is some loose degree of
   synchronization of the repair process even when receivers experience
   uncorrelated data loss.

5.4.1.  Sender Repair State Aggregation

   When a sender is in its normal state of transmitting new data and
   receives a NACK, it begins a procedure to accumulate NACK repair
   state from NORM_NACK messages before beginning repair transmissions.
   Note that this period of aggregating repair state does _not_
   interfere with its ongoing transmission of new data.

   As described in [3], the period of time during which the sender
   aggregates NORM_NACK messages is equal to:

                    T_sndrAggregate = (Ksender+1)*GRTT

   where "Ksender" is the same backoff scaling value used by the
   receivers, and "GRTT" is the sender's current estimate of the group's
   greatest round-trip time.  Note that for NORM unicast sessions the
   "T_sndrAggregate" time can be set to ZERO since there is only one



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 66]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   receiver.  Similarly, the "Ksender" value should be set to ZERO for
   NORM unicast sessions to minimize repair latency.

   When this period ends, the sender "rewinds" by incorporating the
   accumulated repair state into its pending transmission state and
   begins transmitting repair messages.  After pending repair
   transmissions are completed, the sender continues with new
   transmissions of any enqueued data.  Also, at this point in time, the
   sender begins a "holdoff" timeout during which time the sender
   constrains itself from initiating a new repair aggregation cycle,
   even if NORM_NACK messages arrive.  As described in [3], the value of
   this sender "holdoff" period is:

                         T_sndrHoldoff = (1*GRTT)

   If additional NORM_NACK messages are received during this sender
   "holdoff" period, the sender will immediately incorporate these "late
   messages" into its pending transmission state ONLY if the NACK
   content is ordinally greater than the sender's current transmission
   position.  This "holdoff" time allows worst case time for the sender
   to propagate its current transmission sequence position to the group,
   thus avoiding redundant repair transmissions.  After the holdoff
   timeout expires, a new NACK accumulation period can be begun (upon
   arrival of a NACK) in concert with the pending repair and new data
   transmission.  Recall that receivers are not to initiate the NACK
   repair process until the sender's logical transmission position
   exceeds the lowest ordinal position of their repair needs.  With the
   new NACK aggregation period, the sender repeats the same process of
   incorporating accumulated repair state into its transmission plan and
   subsequently "rewinding" to transmit the lowest ordinal repair data
   when the aggregation period expires.  Again, this is conducted in
   concert with ongoing new data and/or pending repair transmissions.

5.4.2.  Sender FEC Repair Transmission Strategy

   The NORM sender should leverage transmission of FEC parity content
   for repair to the greatest extent possible.  Recall that the
   receivers use a strategy to request a lowest common denominator of
   explicit repair (including parity content) in the formation of their
   NORM_NACK messages.  Before falling back to explicitly satisfying
   different receivers' repair needs, the sender can make use of the
   general erasure-filling capability of FEC-generated parity segments.
   The sender can determine the maximum erasure filling needs for
   individual FEC coding blocks from the NORM_NACK messages received
   during the repair aggregation period.  Then, if the sender has a
   sufficient number (less than or equal to the maximum erasure count)
   of previously unsent parity segments available for the applicable
   coding blocks, the sender can transmit these in lieu of the specific



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 67]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   packets the receiver set has requested.  Only after exhausting its
   supply of "fresh" (unsent) parity segments for a given coding block
   should the sender resort to explicit transmission of the receiver
   set's repair needs.  In general, if a sufficiently powerful FEC code
   is used, the need for explicit repair will be an exception, and the
   fulfillment of reliable multicast can be accomplished quite
   efficiently.  However, the ability to resort to explicit repair
   allows the protocol to be reliable under even very extreme
   circumstances.

   NORM_DATA messages sent as repair transmissions SHALL be flagged with
   the NORM_FLAG_REPAIR flag.  This allows receivers to obey any
   policies that limit new receivers from joining the reliable
   transmission when only repair transmissions have been received.
   Additionally, the sender SHOULD additionally flag NORM_DATA
   transmissions sent as explicit repair with the NORM_FLAG_EXPLICIT
   flag.

   Although NORM end system receivers do not make use of the
   NORM_FLAG_EXPLICIT flag, this message transmission status could be
   leveraged by intermediate systems wishing to "assist" NORM protocol
   performance.  If such systems are properly positioned with respect to
   reciprocal reverse-path multicast routing, they need to sub-cast only
   a sufficient count of non-explicit parity repairs to satisfy a
   multicast routing sub-tree's erasure filling needs for a given FEC
   coding block.  When the sender has resorted to explicit repair, then
   the intermediate systems should sub-cast all of the explicit repair
   packets to those portions of the routing tree still requiring repair
   for a given coding block.  Note the intermediate systems will be
   required to conduct repair state accumulation for sub-routes in a
   manner similar to the sender's repair state accumulation in order to
   have sufficient information to perform the sub-casting.
   Additionally, the intermediate systems could perform additional
   NORM_NACK suppression/aggregation as it conducts this repair state
   accumulation for NORM repair cycles.  The detail of this type of
   operation are beyond the scope of this document, but this information
   is provided for possible future consideration.

5.4.3.  Sender NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) Generation

   If the sender receives a NORM_NACK message for repair of data it is
   no longer supporting, the sender generates a NORM_CMD(SQUELCH)
   message to advertise its repair window and squelch any receivers from
   additional NACKing of invalid data.  The transmission rate of
   NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) messages is limited to once per 2*GRTT.  The
   "invalid_object_list" (if applicable) of the NORM_CMD(SQUELCH)
   message SHALL begin with the lowest "object_transport_id" from the
   invalid NORM_NACK messages received since the last NORM_CMD(SQUELCH)



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 68]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   transmission.  Lower ordinal invalid "object_transport_ids" should be
   included only while the NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) payload is less than the
   sender's NormSegmentSize parameter.

5.4.4.  Sender NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) Generation

   When a NORM sender receives NORM_NACK messages from receivers via
   unicast transmission, it uses NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) messages to
   advertise its accumulated repair state to the receiver set since the
   receiver set is not directly sharing their repair needs via multicast
   communication.  A NORM sender implementation MAY use a separate port
   number from the NormSession port number as the source port for its
   transmissions.  Thus NORM receivers can direct any _unicast_ feedback
   messages to this sender port number that is distinct from the
   "session" port number.  Then, the NORM sender implementation can
   discriminate unicast feedback messages from multicast feedback
   messages when there is a mix of multicast and unicast feedback
   receivers.  The NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) message is multicast to the
   receiver set by the sender.  The payload portion of this message has
   content in the same format as the NORM_NACK receiver message payload.
   Receivers are then able to perform feedback suppression in the same
   manner as with NORM_NACK messages directly received from other
   receivers.  Note the sender does not merely retransmit NACK content
   it receives, but instead transmits a representation of its aggregated
   repair state.  The transmission of NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) messages are
   subject to the sender transmit rate limit and NormSegmentSize
   limitation.  When the NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) message is of maximum
   size, receivers SHALL consider the maximum ordinal transmission
   position value embedded in the message as the senders "current"
   transmission position and implicitly suppress requests for ordinally
   higher repair.  For congestion control operation, the sender may also
   need to provide information so that dynamic congestion control
   feedback can be suppressed as needed among receivers.  This document
   specifies the NORM-CC Feedback Header Extension that is applied for
   baseline NORM-CC operation.  If other congestion control mechanisms
   are used within a NORM implementation, other header extensions may be
   defined.  Whatever content format is used for this purpose should
   ensure that maximum possible suppression state is conveyed to the
   receiver set.

5.5.  Additional Protocol Mechanisms

   In addition to the principal function of data content transmission
   and repair, there are some other protocol mechanisms that help NORM
   to adapt to network conditions and play fairly with other coexistent
   protocols.





Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 69]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


5.5.1.  Greatest Round-trip Time Collection

   For NORM receivers to appropriately scale backoff timeouts and the
   senders to use proper corresponding timeouts, the participants must
   agree on a common timeout basis.  Each NORM sender monitors the
   round-trip time of active receivers and determines the group greatest
   round-trip time (GRTT).  The sender advertises this GRTT estimate in
   every message it transmits so that receivers have this value
   available for scaling their timers.  To measure the current GRTT, the
   sender periodically sends NORM_CMD(CC) messages that contain a
   locally generated timestamp.  Receivers are expected to record this
   timestamp along with the time the NORM_CMD(CC) message is received.
   Then, when the receivers generate feedback messages to the sender, an
   adjusted version of the sender timestamp is embedded in the feedback
   message (NORM_NACK or NORM_ACK).  The adjustment adds the amount of
   time the receiver held the timestamp before generating its response.
   Upon receipt of this adjusted timestamp, the sender is able to
   calculate the round-trip time to that receiver.

   The round-trip time for each receiver is fed into an algorithm that
   weights and smoothes the values for a conservative estimate of the
   GRTT.  The algorithm and methodology are described in the NORM
   Building Block document [3] in the section entitled "One-to-Many
   Sender GRTT Measurement".  A conservative estimate helps feedback
   suppression at a small cost in overall protocol repair delay.  The
   sender's current estimate of GRTT is advertised in the "grtt" field
   found in all NORM sender messages.  The advertised GRTT is also
   limited to a minimum of the nominal inter-packet transmission time
   given the sender's current transmission rate and system clock
   granularity.  The reason for this additional limit is to keep the
   receiver somewhat "event driven" by making sure the sender has had
   adequate time to generate any response to repair requests from
   receivers given transmit rate limitations due to congestion control
   or configuration.

   When the NORM-CC Rate header extension is present in NORM_CMD(CC)
   messages, the receivers respond to NORM_CMD(CC) messages as described
   in Section 5.5.2, "NORM Congestion Control Operation".  The
   NORM_CMD(CC) messages are periodically generated by the sender as
   described for congestion control operation.  This provides for
   proactive, but controlled, feedback from the group in the form of
   NORM_ACK messages.  This provides for GRTT feedback even if no
   NORM_NACK messages are being sent.  If operating without congestion
   control in a closed network, the NORM_CMD(CC) messages may be sent
   periodically without the NORM-CC Rate header extension.  In this
   case, receivers will only provide GRTT measurement feedback when
   NORM_NACK messages are generated since no NORM_ACK messages are
   generated.  In this case, the NORM_CMD(CC) messages may be sent less



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 70]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   frequently, perhaps as little as once per minute, to conserve network
   capacity.  Note that the NORM-CC Rate header extension may also be
   used proactively solicit RTT feedback from the receiver group per
   congestion control operation even though the sender may not be
   conducting congestion control rate adjustment.  NORM operation
   without congestion control should be considered only in closed
   networks.

5.5.2.  NORM Congestion Control Operation

   This section describes baseline congestion control operation for the
   NORM protocol (NORM-CC).  The supporting NORM message formats and
   approach described here are an adaptation of the equation-based TCP-
   Friendly Multicast Congestion Control (TFMCC) approach described in
   [5].  This congestion control scheme is REQUIRED for operation within
   the general Internet unless the NORM implementation is adapted to use
   another IETF-sanctioned reliable multicast congestion control
   mechanism (e.g., PGMCC [26]).  With this TFMCC-based approach, the
   transmissions of NORM senders are controlled in a rate-based manner
   as opposed to window-based congestion control algorithms as in TCP.
   However, it is possible that the NORM protocol message set may
   alternatively be used to support a window-based multicast congestion
   control scheme such as PGMCC.  The details of that alternative may be
   described separately or in a future revision of this document.  In
   either case (rate-based TFMCC or window-based PGMCC), successful
   control of sender transmission depends upon collection of sender-to-
   receiver packet loss estimates and RTTs to identify the congestion
   control bottleneck path(s) within the multicast topology and adjust
   the sender rate accordingly.  The receiver with loss and RTT
   estimates that correspond to the lowest resulting calculated
   transmission rate is identified as the "current limiting receiver"
   (CLR).  In the case of a "tie" (where candidate CLRs are within 10%
   of the same calculated rate), the receiver with the largest RTT value
   SHOULD be designated as the CLR.

   As described in [27],  a steady-state sender transmission rate, to be
   "friendly" with competing TCP flows can be calculated as:

                                       S
Rsender = --------------------------------------------------------------
          tRTT*(sqrt((2/3)*p) + 12 * sqrt((3/8)*p) * p * (1 + 32*(p^2)))










Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 71]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   where


      S = Nominal transmitted packet size. (In NORM, the "nominal"
          packet size can be determined by the sender as an
          exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) of transmitted
          packet sizes to account for variable message sizes).

   tRTT = The RTT estimate of the current "current limiting receiver"
          (CLR).

      p = The loss event fraction of the CLR.



   To support congestion control feedback collection and operation, the
   NORM sender periodically transmits NORM_CMD(CC) command messages.
   NORM_CMD(CC) messages are multiplexed with NORM data and repair
   transmissions and serve several purposes:


   1) Stimulate explicit feedback from the general receiver set to
      collect congestion control information.

   2) Communicate state to the receiver set on the sender's
      current congestion control status including details of the
      CLR.

   3) Initiate rapid (immediate) feedback from the CLR in order to
      closely track the dynamics of congestion control for that
      current "worst path" in the group multicast topology.


   The format of the NORM_CMD(CC) message is describe in Section 4.2.3
   of this document.  The NORM_CMD(CC) message contains information to
   allow measurement of RTTs, to inform the group of the congestion
   control CLR, and to provide feedback of individual RTT measurements
   to the receivers in the group.  The NORM_CMD(CC) also provides for
   exciting feedback from OPTIONAL "potential limiting receiver" (PLR)
   nodes that may be determined administratively or possibly
   algorithmically based on congestion control feedback.  PLR nodes are
   receivers that have been identified to have potential for (perhaps
   soon) becoming the CLR and thus immediate, up-to-date feedback is
   beneficial for congestion control performance.  The details of PLR
   selection are not discussed in this document.






Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 72]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


5.5.2.1.  NORM_CMD(CC) Transmission

   The NORM_CMD(CC) message is transmitted periodically by the sender
   along with its normal data transmission.  Note that the repeated
   transmission of NORM_CMD(CC) messages may be initiated some time
   before transmission of user data content at session startup.  This
   may be done to collect some estimation of the current state of the
   multicast topology with respect to group and individual RTT and
   congestion control state.

   A NORM_CMD(CC) message is immediately transmitted at sender startup.
   The interval of subsequent NORM_CMD(CC) message transmission is
   determined as follows:


   1) By default, the interval is set according to the current
      sender GRTT estimate.  A startup GRTT of 0.5 seconds is
      recommended when no feedback has yet been received from the
      group.

   2) Until a CLR has been identified (based on previous receiver
      feedback) or when no data transmission is pending, the
      NORM_CMD(CC) interval is doubled up from its current
      interval to a maximum of once per 30 seconds.  This results
      in a low duty cycle for NORM_CMD(CC) probing when no CLR is
      identified or there is no pending data to transmit.  T}.sp
      3)   T{ When a CLR has been identified (based on receiver
      feedback) and data transmission is pending, the probing
      interval is set to the RTT between the sender and the CLR
      (RTT_clr).

   4) Additionally, when the data transmission rate is low with
      respect to the RTT_clr interval used for probing, the
      implementation should ensure that no more than one
      NORM_CMD(CC) message is sent per NORM_DATA message when
      there is data pending transmission.  This ensures that the
      transmission of this control message is not done to the
      exclusion of user data transmission.


   The NORM_CMD(CC) "cc_sequence" field is incremented with each
   transmission of a NORM_CMD(CC) command.  The greatest "cc_sequence"
   recently received by receivers is included in their feedback to the
   sender.  This allows the sender to determine the "age" of feedback to
   assist in congestion avoidance.

   The NORM-CC Rate Header Extension is applied to the NORM_CMD(CC)
   message and the sender advertises its current transmission rate in



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 73]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   the "send_rate" field.  The rate information is used by receivers to
   initialize loss estimation during congestion control startup or
   restart.

   The "cc_node_list" contains a list of entries identifying receivers
   and their current congestion control state (status "flags", "rtt" and
   "loss" estimates).  The list may be empty if the sender has not yet
   received any feedback from the group.  If the sender has received
   feedback, the list will minimally contain an entry identifying the
   CLR.  A NORM_FLAG_CC_CLR flag value is provided for the "cc_flags"
   field to identify the CLR entry.  It is RECOMMENDED that the CLR
   entry be the first in the list for implementation efficiency.
   Additional entries in the list are used to provide sender-measured
   individual RTT estimates to receivers in the group.  The number of
   additional entries in this list is dependent upon the percentage of
   control traffic the sender application is willing to send with
   respect to user data message transmissions.  More entries in the list
   may allow the sender to be more responsive to congestion control
   dynamics.  The length of the list may be dynamically determined
   according to the current transmission rate and scheduling of
   NORM_CMD(CC) messages.  The maximum length of the list corresponds to
   the sender's NormSegmentSize parameter for the session.  The
   inclusion of additional entries in the list based on receiver
   feedback are prioritized with following rules:


   1) Receivers that have not yet been provided a RTT measurement
      get first priority.  Of these, those with the greatest loss
      fraction receive precedence for list inclusion.

   2) Secondly, receivers that have previously been provided a RTT
      measurement are included with receivers yielding the lowest
      calculated congestion rate getting precedence.


   There are "cc_flag" values in addition to NORM_FLAG_CC_CLR that are
   used for other congestion control functions.  The NORM_FLAG_CC_PLR
   flag value is used to mark additional receivers from that the sender
   would like to have immediate, non-suppressed feedback.  These may be
   receivers that the sender algorithmically identified as potential
   future CLRs or that have been pre-configured as potential congestion
   control points in the network.  The NORM_FLAG_CC_RTT indicates the
   validity of the "cc_rtt" field for the associated receiver node.
   Normally, this flag will be set since the receivers in the list will
   typically be receivers from which the sender has received feedback.
   However, in the case that the NORM sender has been pre-configured
   with a set of PLR nodes, feedback from those receivers may not yet
   have been collected and thus the "cc_rtt" field does not contain a



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 74]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   valid value when this flag is not set.  Similarly, a value of ZERO
   for the "cc_rate" field here should be treated as an invalid value
   and be ignored for the purposes of feedback suppression, etc.


5.5.2.2.  NORM_CMD(CC) Feedback Response

   Receivers explicitly respond to NORM_CMD(CC) messages in the form of
   a NORM_ACK(RTT) message.  The goal of the congestion control feedback
   is to determine the receivers with the lowest congestion control
   rates.  Receivers that are marked as CLR or PLR nodes in the
   NORM_CMD(CC) "cc_node_list" immediately provide feedback in the form
   of a NORM_ACK to this message.  When a NORM_CMD(CC) is received, non-
   CLR or non-PLR nodes initiate random feedback backoff timeouts
   similar to that used when the receiver initiates a repair cycle (see
   Section 5.3) in response to detection of data loss.  The backoff
   timeout for the congestion control response is generated as follows:

           T_backoff = RandomBackoff(K*GRTTsender, GSIZEsender)

   The "RandomBackoff()" algorithm provides a truncated exponentially
   distributed random number and is described in the NORM Building Block
   document [3].  The same backoff factor K = Ksender MAY be used as
   with NORM_NACK suppression.  However, in cases where the application
   purposefully specifies a very small Ksender backoff factor to
   minimize the NACK repair process latency (trading off group size
   scalability), it is RECOMMENDED that a larger backoff factor for
   congestion control feedback is maintained, since there may often be a
   larger volume of congestion control feedback than NACKs in many cases
   and some congestion control feedback latency may be tolerable where
   reliable delivery latency is not.  As previously noted, a backoff
   factor value of K = 4 is generally recommended for ASM operation and
   K = 6 for SSM operation.  A receiver SHALL cancel the backoff timeout
   and thus its pending transmission of a NORM_ACK(RTT) message under
   the following conditions:



   1) The receiver generates another feedback message (NORM_NACK
      or other NORM_ACK) before the congestion control feedback
      timeout expires (these messages will convey the current
      congestion control feedback information),

   2) A NORM_CMD(CC) or other receiver feedback with an ordinally
      greater "cc_sequence" field value is received before the
      congestion control feedback timeout expires (this is similar
      to the TFMCC feedback round number),




Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 75]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   3) When the T_backoff is greater than 1*GRTTsender.  This
      prevents NACK implosion in the event of sender or network
      failure,

   4) "Suppressing" congestion control feedback is heard from
      another receiver (in a NORM_ACK or NORM_NACK) or via a
      NORM_CMD(REPAIR_ADV) message from the sender.  The local
      receiver's feedback is "suppressed" if the rate of the
      competing feedback (Rfb) is sufficiently close to or less
      than the local receiver's calculated rate (Rcalc).  The
      local receiver's feedback is canceled when:

                          Rcalc > (0.9 * Rfb)

      Also note receivers that have not yet received an RTT
      measurement from the sender are suppressed only by other
      receivers that have not yet measured RTT.  Additionally,
      receivers whose RTT estimate has "aged" considerably (i.e.,
      they haven't been included in the NORM_CMD(CC)
      "cc_node_list" in a long time) may wish to compete as a
      receiver with no prior RTT measurement after some long term
      expiration period.



   When the backoff timer expires, the receiver SHALL generate a
   NORM_ACK(RTT) message to provide feedback to the sender and group.
   This message may be multicast to the group for most effective
   suppression in ASM topologies or unicast to the sender depending upon
   how the NORM protocol is deployed and configured.

   Whenever any feedback is generated (including this NORM_ACK(RTT)
   message), receivers include an adjusted version of the sender
   timestamp from the most recently received NORM_CMD(CC) message and
   the "cc_sequence" value from that command in the applicable NORM_ACK
   or NORM_NACK message fields.  For NORM-CC operation, any generated
   feedback message SHALL also contain the NORM-CC Feedback header
   extension.  The receiver provides its current "cc_rate" estimate,
   "cc_loss" estimate, "cc_rtt" if known, and any applicable "cc_flags"
   via this header extension.

   During slow start (when the receiver has not yet detected loss from
   the sender), the receiver uses a value equal to two times its
   measured rate from the sender in the "cc_rate" field.  For steady-
   state congestion control operation, the receiver "cc_rate" value is
   from the equation-based value using its current loss event estimate
   and sender<->receiver RTT information.  (The GRTT is used when the
   receiver has not yet measured its individual RTT).



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 76]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   The "cc_loss" field value reflects the receiver's current loss event
   estimate with respect to the sender in question.

   When the receiver has a valid individual RTT measurement, it SHALL
   include this value in the "cc_rtt" field.  The NORM_FLAG_CC_RTT MUST
   be set when the "cc_rtt" field is valid.

   After a congestion control feedback message is generated or when the
   feedback is suppressed, a non-CLR receiver begins a "holdoff" timeout
   period during which it will restrain itself from providing congestion
   control feedback, even if NORM_CMD(CC) messages are received from the
   sender (unless the receive becomes marked as a CLR or PLR node).  The
   value of this holdoff timeout (T_ccHoldoff) period is:

                          T_ccHoldoff = (K*GRTT)

   Thus, non-CLR receivers are constrained to providing explicit
   congestion control feedback once per K*GRTT intervals.  Note,
   however, that as the session progresses, different receivers will be
   responding to different NORM_CMD(CC) messages and there will be
   relatively continuous feedback of congestion control information
   while the sender is active.


5.5.2.3.  Congestion Control Rate Adjustment

   During steady-state operation, the sender will directly adjust its
   transmission rate to the rate indicated by the feedback from its
   currently selected CLR.  As noted in [24], the estimation of
   parameters (loss and RTT) for the CLR will generally constrain the
   rate changes possible within acceptable bounds.  For rate increases,
   the sender SHALL observe a maximum rate of increase of one packet per
   RTT at all times during steady-state operation.

   The sender processes congestion control feedback from the receivers
   and selects the CLR based on the lowest rate receiver.  Receiver
   rates are either determined directly from the slow start "cc_rate"
   provided by the receiver in the NORM-CC Feedback header extension or
   by performing the equation-based calculation using individual RTT and
   loss estimates ("cc_loss") as feedback is received.

   The sender can calculate a current RTT for a receiver (RTT_rcvrNew)
   using the "grtt_response" timestamp included in feedback messages.
   When the "cc_rtt" value in a response is not valid, the sender simply
   uses this RTT_rcvrNew value as the receiver's current RTT (RTT_rcvr).
   For non-CLR and non-PLR receivers, the sender can use the "cc_rtt"
   value provided in the NORM-CC Feedback header extension as the
   receiver's previous RTT measurement (RTT_rcvrPrev) to smooth



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 77]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   according to:

             RTT_rcvr = 0.5 * RTT_rcvrPrev + 0.5 * RTT_rcvrNew

   For CLR receivers where feedback is received more regularly, the
   sender SHOULD maintain a more smoothed RTT estimate upon new feedback
   from the CLR where:

                RTT_clr = 0.9 * RTT_clr + 0.1 * RTT_clrNew

   "RTT_clrNew" is the new RTT calculated from the timestamp in the
   feedback message received from the CLR.  The RTT_clr is initialized
   to RTT_clrNew on the first feedback message received.  Note that the
   same procedure is observed by the sender for PLR receivers and that
   if a PLR is "promoted" to CLR status, the smoothed estimate can be
   continued.

   There are some additional periods besides steady-state operation that
   need to be considered in NORM-CC operation.  These periods are:


     1)   during session startup,

     2)   when no feedback is received from the CLR, and

     3)   when the sender has a break in data transmission.


   During session startup, the congestion control operation SHALL
   observe a "slow start" procedure to quickly approach its fair
   bandwidth share.  An initial sender startup rate is assumed where:

   Rinitial = MIN(NormSegmentSize / GRTT, NormSegmentSize) bytes/second.

   The rate is increased only when feedback is received from the
   receiver set.  The "slow start" phase proceeds until any receiver
   provides feedback indicating that loss has occurred.  Rate increase
   during slow start is applied as:

                             Rnew = Rrecv_min

   where "Rrecv_min" is the minimum reported receiver rate in the
   "cc_rate" field of congestion control feedback messages received from
   the group.  Note that during "slow start", receivers use two times
   their measured rate from the sender in the "cc_rate" field of their
   feedback.  Rate increase adjustment is limited to once per GRTT
   during slow start.




Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 78]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   If the CLR or any receiver intends to leave the group, it will set
   the NORM_FLAG_CC_LEAVE in its congestion control feedback message as
   an indication that the sender should not select it as the CLR.  When
   the CLR changes to a lower rate receiver, the sender should
   immediately adjust to the new lower rate.  The sender is limited to
   increasing its rate at one additional packet per RTT towards any new,
   higher CLR rate.

   The sender should also track the "age" of the feedback it has
   received from the CLR by comparing its current "cc_sequence" value
   (Seq_sender) to the last "cc_sequence" value received from the CLR
   (Seq_clr).  As the "age" of the CLR feedback increases with no new
   feedback, the sender SHALL begin reducing its rate once per RTT_clr
   as a congestion avoidance measure.  The following algorithm is used
   to determine the decrease in sender rate (Rsender bytes/sec) as the
   CLR feedback, unexpectedly, excessively ages:

   Age = Seq_sender - Seq_clr;
   if (Age > 4) Rsender = Rsender * 0.5;

   This rate reduction is limited to the lower bound on NORM
   transmission rate.  After NORM_ROBUST_FACTOR consecutive NORM_CMD(CC)
   rounds without any feedback from the CLR, the sender SHOULD assume
   the CLR has left the group and pick the receiver with the next lowest
   rate as the new CLR.  Note this assumes that the sender does not have
   explicit knowledge that the CLR intentionally left the group.  If no
   receiver feedback is received, the sender MAY wish to withhold
   further transmissions of NORM_DATA segments and maintain NORM_CMD(CC)
   transmissions only until feedback is detected.  After such a CLR
   timeout, the sender will be transmitting with a minimal rate and
   should return to slow start as described here for a break in data
   transmission.

   When the sender has a break in its data transmission, it can continue
   to probe the group with NORM_CMD(CC) messages to maintain RTT
   collection from the group.  This will enable the sender to quickly
   determine an appropriate CLR upon data transmission restart.
   However, the sender should exponentially reduce its target rate to be
   used for transmission restart as time since the break elapses.  The
   target rate SHOULD be recalculated once per RTT_clr as:

                         Rsender = Rsender * 0.5;

   If the minimum NORM rate is reached, the sender should set the
   NORM_FLAG_START flag in its NORM_CMD(CC) messages upon restart and
   the group should observer "slow start" congestion control procedures
   until any receiver experiences a new loss event.




Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 79]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


5.5.3.  NORM Positive Acknowledgment Procedure

   NORM provides options for the source application to request positive
   acknowledgment (ACK) of NORM_CMD(FLUSH) and NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ)
   messages from members of the group.  There are some specific
   acknowledgment requests defined for the NORM protocol and a range of
   acknowledgment request types that are left to be defined by the
   application.  One predefined acknowledgment type is the
   NORM_ACK_FLUSH type.  This acknowledgment is used to determine if
   receivers have achieved completion of reliable reception up through a
   specific logical transmission point with respect to the sender's
   sequence of transmission.  The NORM_ACK_FLUSH acknowledgment may be
   used to assist in application flow control when the sender has
   information on a portion of the receiver set.  Another predefined
   acknowledgment type is NORM_ACK(CC), which is used to explicitly
   provide congestion control feedback in response to NORM_CMD(CC)
   messages transmitted by the sender for NORM-CC operation.  Note the
   NORM_ACK(CC) response does NOT follow the positive acknowledgment
   procedure described here.  The NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) and NORM_ACK
   messages contain an "ack_type" field to identify the type of
   acknowledgment requested and provided.  A range of "ack_type" values
   is provided for application-defined use.  While the application is
   responsible for initiating the acknowledgment request and interprets
   application-defined "ack_type" values, the acknowledgment procedure
   SHOULD be conducted within the protocol implementation to take
   advantage of timing and transmission scheduling information available
   to the NORM transport.

   The NORM positive acknowledgment procedure uses polling by the sender
   to query the receiver group for response.  Note this polling
   procedure is not intended to scale to very large receiver groups, but
   could be used in large group setting to query a critical subset of
   the group.  Either the NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ), or when applicable, the
   NORM_CMD(FLUSH) message is used for polling and contains a list of
   NormNodeIds for receivers that should respond to the command.  The
   list of receivers providing acknowledgment is determined by the
   source application with "a priori" knowledge of participating nodes
   or via some other application-level mechanism.

   The ACK process is initiated by the sender that generates
   NORM_CMD(FLUSH) or NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) messages in periodic "rounds".
   For NORM_ACK_FLUSH requests, the NORM_CMD(FLUSH) contain a
   "object_transport_id" and "fec_payload_id" denoting the watermark
   transmission point for which acknowledgment is requested.  This
   watermark transmission point is "echoed" in the corresponding fields
   of the NORM_ACK(FLUSH) message sent by the receiver in response.
   NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) messages contain an "ack_id" field which is
   similarly "echoed" in response so that the sender may match the



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 80]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   response to the appropriate request.

   In response to the NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ), the listed receivers randomly
   spread NORM_ACK messages uniformly in time over a window of (1*GRTT).
   These NORM_ACK messages are typically unicast to the sender.  (Note
   that NORM_ACK(CC) messages SHALL be multicast or unicast in the same
   manner as NORM_NACK messages).

   The ACK process is self-limiting and avoids ACK implosion in that:

     1)   Only a single NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) message is generated once per
          (2*GRTT), and,

     2)   The size of the "acking_node_list" of NormNodeIds from which
          acknowledgment is requested is limited to a maximum of the
          sender NormSegmentSize setting per round of the positive
          acknowledgment process.


   Because the size of the included list is limited to the sender's
   NormSegmentSize setting, multiple NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) rounds may be
   required to achieve responses from all receivers specified.   The
   content of the attached NormNodeId list will be dynamically updated
   as this process progresses and NORM_ACK responses are received from
   the specified receiver set.  As the sender receives valid responses
   (i.e., matching watermark point or "ack_id") from receivers, it SHALL
   eliminate those receivers from the subsequent NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ)
   message "acking_node_list" and add in any pending receiver
   NormNodeIds while keeping within the NormSegmentSize limitation of
   the list size.  Each receiver is queried a maximum number of times
   (NORM_ROBUST_FACTOR, by default).  Receivers not responding within
   this number of repeated requests are removed from the payload list to
   make room for other potential receivers pending acknowledgment.  The
   transmission of the NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) is repeated until no further
   responses are required or until the repeat threshold is exceeded for
   all pending receivers.  The transmission of NORM_CMD(ACK_REQ) or
   NORM_CMD(FLUSH) messages to conduct the positive acknowledgment
   process is multiplexed with ongoing sender data transmissions.
   However, the NORM_CMD(FLUSH) positive acknowledgment process may be
   interrupted in response to negative acknowledgment repair requests
   (NACKs) received from receivers during the acknowledgment period.
   The NORM_CMD(FLUSH) positive acknowledgment process is restarted for
   receivers pending acknowledgment once any the repairs have been
   transmitted.

   In the case of NORM_CMD(FLUSH) commands with an attached
   "acking_node_list", receivers will not ACK until they have received
   complete transmission of all data up to and including the given



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 81]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   watermark transmission point.  All receivers SHALL interpret the
   watermark point provided in the request NACK for repairs if needed as
   for NORM_CMD(FLUSH) commands with no attached "acking_node_list".

5.5.4.  Group Size Estimate

   NORM sender messages contain a "gsize" field that is a representation
   of the group size and is used in scaling random backoff timer ranges.
   The use of the group size estimate within the NORM protocol does not
   require a precise estimation and works reasonably well if the
   estimate is within an order of magnitude of the actual group size.
   By default, the NORM sender group size estimate may be
   administratively configured.  Also, given the expected scalability of
   the NORM protocol for general use, a default value of 10,000 is
   RECOMMENDED for use as the group size estimate.

   It is possible that group size may be algorithmically approximated
   from the volume of congestion control feedback messages which follow
   the exponentially weighted random backoff.  However, the
   specification of such an algorithm is currently beyond the scope of
   this document.

6.  Security Considerations

   The same security considerations that apply to the NORM, TFMCC, and
   FEC Building Blocks also apply to the NORM protocol.  In addition to
   vulnerabilities that any IP and IP multicast protocol implementation
   may be generally subject to, the NACK-based feedback of NORM may be
   exploited by replay attacks which force the NORM sender to
   unnecessarily transmit repair information.  This MAY be addressed by
   network layer IP security implementations that guard against this
   potential security exploitation.  The NORM protocol is compatible
   with the use of the IP security (IPsec) architecture described in
   [6]. and the IPSec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) protocol or
   Authentication Header (AF) extension MAY be used to secure IP packets
   transmitted by NORM participants.

   Alternatively, a header extension may be applied to the NORM protocol
   to provide authentication of NORM messages.  For this purpose the
   EXT_AUTH header extension (HET = 1) is defined.  The format of this
   header extension and its processing is outside the scope of this
   document and is to be communicated out-of-band as part of the session
   description.  It is possible that an EXT_AUTH implementation of MAY
   also provide for encryption of NORM message payloads as well as
   authentication.  The use of this approach as compared to IPSec can
   allow for header compression techniques to be applied jointly to IP
   and NORM protocol headers.  In cases where security analysis deems
   that encryption of NORM protocol header content is beneficial or



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 82]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   necessary, the aforementioned use of IPSec ESP may be more
   appropriate.  If EXT_AUTH is present, whatever packet authentication
   checks that can be performed immediately upon reception of the packet
   SHOULD be performed before accepting the packet and performing any
   congestion control-related action on it.  Some packet authentication
   schemes impose a delay of several seconds between when a packet is
   received and when the packet is fully authenticated.  Any congestion
   control related action that is appropriate MUST NOT be postponed by
   any such full packet authentication.  Consideration SHOULD also be
   given to the potential for replay-attacks that would transplant
   authenticated packets from one NORM session to another to disrupt
   service.  To avoid this potential, unique keys SHOULD be used on a
   per-session basis or NORM sender nodes SHOULD use unique
   "instance_id" identifiers that are managed as part of the security
   association for the sessions.

   It is RECOMMENDED that such security mechanisms be used when
   available.  It should be noted that NORM participants can use the
   "sequence" field from the NORM Common Message Header to detect replay
   attacks.  This can be accomplished if the NORM sender is willing to
   maintain state on receivers which are NACKing.  A cache of such
   receiver state can be used to provide protection against NACK replay
   attacks.  NORM receivers SHOULD also also maintain similar state for
   protection against possible replay of other receiver messages in ASM
   operation as well.  For example, a receiver could be suppressed from
   providing NACK or congestion control feedback by replay of certain
   receiver messages.  For these reasons, authentication of NORM
   messages (e.g., via IPSec) is RECOMMENDED for protection against
   similar attacks that might use fabricated messages.  Also, encryption
   of messages to provide confidientiality of application data and
   protect privacy of users MAY also be applied using IPSec or similar
   mechanisms.  When any such cryptographic measures are used, it is
   RECOMMENDED that an approach such as described in the Group Domain of
   Interpretation (GDOI) [28], Multimedia Internet KEYing (MIKEY) [29]
   or Group Secure Association Key Management Protocol (GSAKMP) [30]
   specifications for automated key management is applied.

   It is also important to note that while NORM does leverage FEC-based
   repair for scalability, this does not alone guarantee integrity of
   received data.  Application-level integrity-checking of data content
   is highly RECOMMENDED.


6.1.  Baseline Secure NORM Operation

   This section describes a baseline mode of secure NORM protocol
   operation based on application of the IPSec security protocol.  This
   approach is documented here to provide a reference, interoperable



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 83]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   secure mode of operation.  However, additional approaches to NORM
   security, including other forms of IPSec application, MAY be
   specified in the future.  For example, the use of the EXT_AUTH header
   extension could enable NORM-specific authentication or security
   encapsulation headers similar to those of IPSec to be specified and
   inserted into the NORM protocol message headers.  This would allow
   header compression techniques to be applied to IP and NORM protocol
   headers when needed in a similar fashion to that of RTP [22] and as
   preserved in the specification for Secure Real Time Protocol (SRTP)
   [23].  The baseline approach described is applicable to NORM
   operation configured for SSM (or SSM-like) operation where there is a
   single sender and the receivers are providing unicast feedback.  This
   form of NORM operation allows for IPSec to be used with a manageable
   number of security associations (SA).


6.1.1.  IPSec Approach

   For NORM one-to-many SSM operation with unicast feedback from
   receivers, each node SHALL be configured with two transport mode
   IPSec security associations and corresponding Security Policy
   Database (SDP) entries.  One entry will be used for sender-to-group
   multicast packet authentication and optionally encryption while the
   other entry will be used to provide security for the unicast feedback
   messaging from the receiver(s) to the sender.

   The NORM sender SHALL use an IPSec SA configured for ESP protocol [7]
    operation with the option for data origination authentication
   enabled.  It is also RECOMMENDED that this IPSec ESP SA be also
   configured to provide confidentiality protection for IP packets
   containing NORM protocol messages.  This is suggested to make the
   realization of complex replay attacks much more difficult.  The
   encryption key for this SA SHALL be preplaced at the sender and
   receiver(s) prior to NORM protocol operation.  Use of automated key
   management is RECOMMENDED as a rekey SHALL be required prior to
   expiration of the sequence space for the SA.  This is necessary so
   that receivers may use the built-in IPSec replay attack protection
   possible for an IPSec SA with a single source (the NORM sender).
   Thus the receivers SHALL enable replay attack protection for this SA
   used to secure NORM sender traffic.  An IPSec SPD entry MUST be
   configured to process outbound packets to the session (destination)
   address and UDP port number of the applicable (NormSession).

   The NORM receiver(s) MUST be configured with the SA and SPD entry to
   properly process the IPSec-secured packets from the sender.  The NORM
   receiver(s) SHALL also use a common, second IPSec SA (common Security
   Parameter Index (SPI) and encryption key) configured for ESP
   operation with the option for data origination authentication



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 84]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   enabled.  Similar to the NORM sender, is is RECOMMENDED this IPSec
   ESP SA be also configured to provide confidentiality protection for
   IP packets containing NORM protocol messages.  The receivers MUST
   have an IPSec SPD entry configured to process outbound NORM/UDP
   packets directed to the NORM sender source address and port number
   using this second SA.  As noted for NORM unicast feedback, the
   sender's transmission port number SHOULD be distinct from the
   multicast session port number to allow discrimination between unicast
   and multicast feedback messages when access to the IP destination
   address is not possible (e.g., a user-space NORM implementation).
   For processing of packets from receivers, the NORM sender SHALL be
   configured with this common, second SA (and the corresponding SPD
   entry needed) in order to properly process messages from the
   receiver.  Note that built-in IPSec replay attack protection for this
   second SA at the sender MUST be disabled.

   Multiple receivers using a common IPSec SA for traffic directed to
   the NORM sender (i.e., many-to-one) prevents the use of built-in
   IPSec replay attack protection by the NORM sender with current IPSec
   implementations.  So, to support a fully secure mode of operation,
   the NORM sender implementation MUST provide replay attack protection
   based upon the "sequence" field of NORM protocol messages from
   receivers.  This can be accomplished with high assurance of security,
   even with the limited size (16-bits) of this field, because


   1) NORM receiver NACK and non-CLR ACK feedback messages are
      sparse.

   2) The more frequent NORM ACK feedback from CLR or PLR nodes
      are only a small set of receivers for which the sender must
      keep more persistent replay attack state.

   3) NORM NACK feedback messages that precede the sender's
      current repair window do not significantly impact protocol
      operation (generation of NORM_CMD(SQUELCH) is limited) and
      could be in fact ignored.  This means the sender can prune
      any replay attack state for receivers that precede the
      current repair window.

   4) NORM ACK messages correspond to either a specific sender
      "ack_id", the sender "cc_sequence" for ACKs sent in response
      to NORM_CMD(CC), or the sender's current repair window in
      the case of ACKs sent in response to NORM_CMD(FLUSH).  Thus,
      the sender can prune any replay attack state for receivers
      that precede the current applicable sequence or repair
      window space.




Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 85]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   Note that use of ESP confidentiality, as RECOMMENDED, for secure NORM
   protocol operation makes it more difficult for adversaries to conduct
   effective replay attacks.  Additionally, it should be noted that a
   NORM sender implementation with access to the full ESP protocol
   header could also use the ESP sequence information to make this form
   of replay attack protection even more robust.  The design of this
   baseline security approach for NORM intentionally places any more
   complex processing state or processing (e.g. replay attack protection
   given multiple receivers) at the NORM sender since NORM receiver
   implementations may need to have a more "light-weight" realization in
   many cases.

   This baseline approach can be used for NORM protocol sessions with
   multiple senders if the SA pairs described are established for each
   sender.  For small-sized groups, it is even possible that many-to-
   many (ASM) IPSec configuration could be achieved where each
   participant uses a unique SA (with a unique SPI).  This does not
   scale to larger group sizes given the complex set of SA and SPD
   entries each participant would need to maintain.

   It is anticipated in early deployments of this baseline approach to
   NORM security that key management will be conducted out-of-band with
   respect to NORM protocol operation.  In the case of one-to-many NORM
   operation, it is possible that receivers may retrieve keying
   information from a central server as needed or otherwise conduct
   group key updates with a similar centralized approach.  However, it
   may be possible with some key management schemes for rekey messages
   to be transmitted to the group as a message or transport object
   within the NORM reliable transfer session.  Similarly, for group-wise
   communication sessions it is possible that potential group
   participants may request keying and/or rekeying as part of NORM
   communications.  Additional specification is necessary to define an
   in-band key managment scheme for NORM sessions perhaps using the
   mechanisms of the automated group key management specifications cited
   in this document.


6.1.2.  IPSec Requirements

   In order to implement this secure mode of NORM protocol operation,
   the following IPSec capabilities are required.

6.1.2.1.  Selectors

   The implementation MUST be able to use the source address,
   destination address, protocol (UDP), and UDP port numbers as
   selectors in the SPD.




Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 86]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


6.1.2.2.  Mode

   IPSec in transport mode MUST be supported.  The use of IPSec
   processing for secure NORM traffic SHOULD also be "required" such
   that unauthenticated packets are not received by the NORM protocol
   implementation.  [6].

6.1.2.3.  Key Management

   An automated key management scheme for group key distribution and
   rekeying such as GDOI [28], GSAKMP [30], or MIKEY [29] SHOULD be
   used.  Relatively short-lived NORM sessions MAY be able to use Manual
   Keying with a single, preplaced key, particularly if Extended
   Sequence Numbering (ESN) [7] is available in the IPSec implementation
   used.  It should also be noted that it may be possible for key update
   messages (e.g., the GDOI GROUPKEY-PUSH message) to be included in the
   NORM application reliable data transmission if appropriate interfaces
   were available between the NORM application and the key management
   daemon.

6.1.2.4.  Security Policy

   Receivers SHOULD accept connections only from the designated,
   authorized sender(s).  It is expected that appropriate key management
   will provide encryption keys only to receivers authorized to
   participate in a designated session.  The approach outlined here
   allows receiver sets to be controlled on a per-sender basis.

6.1.2.5.  Authentication and Encryption

   Large NORM group sizes will necessitate some form of key management
   that does rely upon shared secrets.  The GDOI and GSAKMP protocols
   mentioned here allow for certificate-based authentication.  These
   certificates SHOULD use IP addresses for authentication although it
   may alternatively possible to have authentication associated with
   pre-assigned NormNodeId values.  However, it is likely that available
   group key management implementations will not be NORM-specific.

6.1.2.6.  Availability

   The IPSec requirements profile outlined here is commonly available on
   many potential NORM hosts.  The principal issue is that configuration
   and operation of IPSec typically requires privileged user
   authorization.  Automated key management implementations are
   typically configured with the privileges necessary to effect system
   IPSec configuration needed.





Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 87]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


7.  IANA Considerations

   Header extension identifiers for the NORM protocol are subject to
   IANA registration.  Additionally, building blocks components used by
   this NORM Protocol specification may introduce additional IANA
   considerations.  In particular, the FEC Building Block used by NORM
   does require IANA registration of the FEC codecs used.  The
   registration instructions for FEC codecs are provided in [4].

7.1.


   This document defines a name-space for NORM Header Extensions named:
                         ietf:rmt:norm:extensions

   These values represent extended header fields that allow the protocol
   functionality to be expanded to include additional optional features
   and operating modes.  The values that can be assigned within the
   "ietf:rmt:norm:extension" name-space are numeric indexes in the range
   {0, 255}, boundaries included.  Values in the range {0,127} indicate
   variable length extended header fields while values in the range
   {128,255} indicate extension of a fixed 4-byte length.  NORM header
   extension indentifier value assignment requests are granted on a
   "Specification Required" basis as defined in [8].  Additional header
   extension specifications MUST include a description of protocol
   actions to be taken when the the extended header is encountered by a
   protocol implementation not supporting that specific option.  For
   example, it may be possible for protocol implementations to ignore
   unknown header extensions in many cases.

   This specification registers the following NORM Header Extension
   types in namespace "ietf:rmt:norm:extensions":


  +------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------+
  |Value |   Name    |                   Reference                   |
  +------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------+
  |   1  | EXT_AUTH  | This specification                            |
  +------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------+
  |   3  |  EXT_CC   | This specification                            |
  +------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------+
  |  64  | EXT_FTI   | This specification                            |
  +------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------+
  | 128  | EXT_RATE  | This specification                            |
  +------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------+






Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 88]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


8.  Suggested Use

   The present NORM protocol is seen as useful tool for the reliable
   data transfer over generic IP multicast services.  It is not the
   intention of the authors to suggest it is suitable for supporting all
   envisioned multicast reliability requirements.  NORM provides a
   simple and flexible framework for multicast applications with a
   degree of concern for network traffic implosion and protocol overhead
   efficiency.  NORM-like protocols have been successfully demonstrated
   within the MBone for bulk data dissemination applications, including
   weather satellite compressed imagery updates servicing a large group
   of receivers and a generic web content reliable "push" application.

   In addition, this framework approach has some design features making
   it attractive for bulk transfer in asymmetric and wireless
   internetwork applications.  NORM is capable of successfully operating
   independent of network structure and in environments with high packet
   loss, delay, and misordering.  Hybrid proactive/reactive FEC-based
   repairing improve protocol performance in some multicast scenarios.
   A sender-only repair approach often makes additional engineering
   sense in asymmetric networks.  NORM's unicast feedback capability may
   be suitable for use in asymmetric networks or in networks where only
   unidirectional multicast routing/delivery service exists. Asymmetric
   architectures supporting multicast delivery are likely to make up an
   important portion of the future Internet structure (e.g.,
   DBS/cable/PSTN hybrids) and efficient, reliable bulk data transfer
   will be an important capability for servicing large groups of
   subscribed receivers.

9.  Changes from RFC3940

   This section lists the changes between the Experimental version of
   this specification, [10], and this version:

     1)   Removal of the NORM_FLAG_MSG_START for NORM_OBJECT_STREAM,
          replacing it with the "payload_msg_start" field in the FEC-
          encoded preamble of the NORM_OBJECT_STREAM NORM_DATA payload,

     2)   Definition of IANA namespace for header extension assignment,

     3)   Removal of file blocking scheme description that is now
          specified in the FEC Building Block document [4],

     4)   Removal of restriction of NORM receiver feedback message rate
          to local NORM sender rate (this caused congestion control
          failures in high speed operation and the extremely low
          feedback rate of the NORM protocol as compared to TCP avoids
          any resultant impact to the network [31]),



Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 89]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


     5)   Correction of errors in some message format descriptions, and

     6)   Correction of inconsistency in specification of the inactivity
          timeout.

     7)   Addition of IPSec secure mode description with IPSec
          requirements.

     8)   Clarification of interpretation of "Source Block Length" when
          FEC codes are arbitrarily shortened by the sender.

10.  Acknowledgments (and these are not Negative)

   The authors would like to thank Rick Jones, Vincent Roca, Rod Walsh,
   Toni Paila, Michael Luby, and Joerg Widmer for their valuable input
   and comments on this document.  The authors would also like to thank
   the RMT working group chairs, Roger Kermode and Lorenzo Vicisano, for
   their support in development of this specification, and Sally Floyd
   for her early input into this document.

11.  References

11.1.  Normative References

   [1] Bradner, S.,  "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
   Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [2] Deering, S., "Host Extensions for IP Multicasting", STD 5, RFC
   1112, August 1989.

   [3] Adamson, B., Bormann, C., Handley, M., and J. Macker, "Multicast
   Negative-Acknowledgement (NACK) Building Blocks", draft-ietf-rmt-bb-
   norm-revised-03, July 2007.

   [4] Watson, M., Luby, M., and L. Vicisano, "Forward Error Correction
   (FEC) Building Block", draft-ietf-rmt-fec-bb-revised-07, April 2007.

   [5] J. Widmer and M. Handley, "TCP-Friendly Multicast Congestion
   Control (TFMCC) Protocol Specification", RFC 4654, August 2006.

   [6] S. Kent and K. Seo, "Security Architecture for the Internet
   Protocol", RFC 4301, December 2005.

   [7] S. Kent, "IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)", RFC 4303,
   December 2005.






Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 90]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   [8] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA
   Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434, October 1998.


11.2.  Informative References

   [9] Kermode, R. and L. Vicisano, "Author Guidelines for Reliable
   Multicast Transport (RMT) Building Blocks and Protocol Instantiation
   documents", RFC 3269, April 2002.
   [10] Adamson, B., Bormann, C., Handley, M., and J. Macker, "Negative-
   Acknowledgement (NACK)-Oriented Reliable Multicast (NORM) Protocol",
   RFC 3940, November 2004.

   [11] Handley, M., Jacobson, V. and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session
   Description Protocol", RFC 4566, July 2006.

   [12] Handley, M., Perkins, C., and E. Whelan, "Session Announcement
   Protocol", RFC 2974, October 2000.

   [13] S. Pingali, D. Towsley, J. Kurose, "A Comparison of Sender-
   Initiated and Receiver-Initiated Reliable Multicast Protocols", In
   Proc. INFOCOM, San Francisco CA, October 1993.

   [14] Luby, M., Vicisano, L., Gemmell, J., Rizzo, L., Handley, M., and
   J. Crowcroft, "The Use of Forward Error Correction (FEC) in Reliable
   Multicast", RFC 3453, December 2002.

   [15] Macker, J. and B. Adamson, "The Multicast Dissemination Protocol
   (MDP) Toolkit", Proc. IEEE MILCOM 99, October 1999.

   [16] Nonnenmacher, J. and E. Biersack, "Optimal Multicast Feedback",
   Proc. IEEE INFOCOMM, p. 964, March/April 1998.

   [17] J. Macker, B. Adamson, "Quantitative Prediction of Nack Oriented
   Reliable Multicast (NORM) Feedback", Proc. IEEE MILCOM 2002, October
   2002.

   [18] H.W. Holbrook, "A Channel Model for Multicast", Ph.D.
   Dissertation, Stanford University, Department of Computer Science,
   Stanford, California, August 2001.

   [19] D. Gossink, J. Macker, "Reliable Multicast and Integrated Parity
   Retransmission with Channel Estimation", IEEE GLOBECOMM 98',
   September 1998.







Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 91]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


   [20] Whetten, B., Vicisano, L., Kermode, R., Handley, M., Floyd, S.,
   and M. Luby, "Reliable Multicast Transport Building Blocks for One-
   to-Many Bulk-Data Transfer", RFC 3048, January 2001.

   [21] Mankin, A., Romanow, A., Bradner, S., and V. Paxson, "IETF
   Criteria for Evaluating Reliable Multicast Transport and Application
   Protocols", RFC 2357, June 1998.

   [22] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson,
   "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", STD 64, RFC
   3550, July 2003.

   [23] Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K.
   Norrman, "The Secure Real Time Transport Protocol", RFC 3711, March
   2004.

   [24] J. Widmer and M. Handley, "Extending Equation-Based Congestion
   Control to Multicast Applications", Proc ACM SIGCOMM 2001, San Diego,
   August 2001.


   [25] Watson, M., "Basic Forward Error Correction (FEC) Schemes",
   Internet-Draft draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-basic-schemes-revised-03,
   February 2007.

   [26] L. Rizzo, "pgmcc: A TCP-Friendly Single-Rate Multicast
   Congestion Control Scheme", Proc ACM SIGCOMM 2000, Stockholm, August
   2000.

   [27] J. Padhye, V. Firoiu, D. Towsley, and J. Kurose, "Modeling TCP
   Throughput: A Simple Model and its Empirical Validation", Proc ACM
   SIGCOMM 1998.

   [28] Baugher, M., Weis, B., Hardjono, T., and H. Harney, "The Group
   Domain of Interpretation", RFC 3547, July 2003.

   [29] Arkko, J., Carrara, E., Lindholm, F., Naslund, M., and K.
   Norrman, "MIKEY: Multimedia Internet KEYing", RFC 3830, August 2004.

   [30] Harney, H., Meth, U., Colegrove, A., and G. Gross, "GSAKMP:
   Group Secure Association Key Management Protocol", RFC 4535, June
   2006.

   [31] Adamson, B. and J. Macker, "A TCP-Friendly, Rate-based Mechanism
   for NACK-Oriented Reliable Multicast Congestion Control", IEEE
   GLOBECOMM 2001, November 2001.





Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 92]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


12.  Authors' Addresses

   Brian Adamson
   Naval Research Laboratory
   Washington, DC, USA, 20375

   EMail: adamson@itd.nrl.navy.mil


   Carsten Bormann
   Universitaet Bremen TZI
   Postfach 330440
   D-28334 Bremen, Germany

   EMail: cabo@tzi.org


   Mark Handley
   Department of Computer Science
   University College London
   Gower Street
   London
   WC1E 6BT
   UK

   EMail: M.Handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk


   Joe Macker
   Naval Research Laboratory
   Washington, DC, USA, 20375

   EMail: macker@itd.nrl.navy.mil


















Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 93]

Internet-Draft                NORM Protocol                   March 2007


13.  Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
   THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
   OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
   ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.







Adamson, et al.         Expires: 31 December 2007              [Page 94]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.108, available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/