[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Nits]

Versions: 00 RFC 3742

Internet Engineering Task Force                              Sally Floyd
INTERNET DRAFT                                                      ICSI
draft-ietf-tsvwg-slowstart-00.txt                             July, 2003



        Limited Slow-Start for TCP with Large Congestion Windows



                          Status of this Memo


   This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

Abstract

   This note describes an optional modification for TCP's slow-start for
   use with TCP connections with large congestion windows.  For TCP
   connections that are able to use congestion windows of thousands (or
   tens of thousands) of MSS-sized segments (for MSS the sender's
   MAXIMUM SEGMENT SIZE), the current slow-start procedure can result in
   increasing the congestion window by thousands of segments in a single
   round-trip time.  Such an increase can easily result in thousands of
   packets being dropped in one round-trip time.  This is often counter-
   productive for the TCP flow itself, and is also hard on the rest of
   the traffic sharing the congested link.  This note describes Limited
   Slow-Start as an optional mechanism for limiting the number of
   segments by which the congestion window is increased for one window
   of data during slow-start, in order to improve performance for TCP
   connections with large congestion windows.



Floyd                         Experimental                      [Page 1]

draft-ietf-tsvwg-slowstart-00                                August 2002


   Changes from draft-floyd-tcp-slowstart-02.txt:

   New name of draft.

   Changes from draft-floyd-tcp-slowstart-01.txt:

   * Minor changes in language to submit for an Experimental RFC.

   Changes from draft-floyd-tcp-slowstart-00.txt:

   * Small changes in presentation.

   * The addition of a section of Experiments.

   * More citations to related work.

1.  Introduction

   This note describes an optional modification for TCP's slow-start for
   use with TCP connections with large congestion windows.  For TCP
   connections that are able to use congestion windows of thousands (or
   tens of thousands) of MSS-sized segments (for MSS the sender's
   MAXIMUM SEGMENT SIZE), the current slow-start procedure can result in
   increasing the congestion window by thousands of segments in a single
   round-trip time.  Such an increase can easily result in thousands of
   packets being dropped in one round-trip time.  This is often counter-
   productive for the TCP flow itself, and is also hard on the rest of
   the traffic sharing the congested link.  This note describes Limited
   Slow-Start, limiting the number of segments by which the congestion
   window is increased for one window of data during slow-start, in
   order to improve performance for TCP connections with large
   congestion windows.

   When slow-start results in a large increase in the congestion window
   in one round-trip time, a large number of packets might be dropped in
   the network (even with carefully-tuned active queue management
   mechanisms in the routers).  This drop of a large number of packets
   in the network can result in unnecessary retransmit timeouts for the
   TCP connection.  The TCP connection could end up in congestion
   avoidance phase with a very small congestion window, and could take a
   large number of round-trip times to recover its old congestion
   window.  This poor performance is illustrated in [F02].

2.  The Proposal for Limited Slow-Start

   Limited Slow-Start introduces a parameter, "max_ssthresh", and the
   slow-start is only modified for values of the congestion window
   "cwnd" greater than "max_ssthresh".  That is, during Slow-Start, when



Floyd                         Experimental                      [Page 2]

draft-ietf-tsvwg-slowstart-00                                August 2002


     cwnd <= max_ssthresh,

   cwnd is increased by one MSS (MAXIMUM SEGMENT SIZE) for every
   arriving ACK (acknowledgement) during slow-start, as is always the
   case.  During Limited Slow-Start, when

     max_ssthresh < cwnd <= ssthresh,

   the invariant is maintained that the congestion window is increased
   during slow-start by at most max_ssthresh/2 MSS per round-trip time.
   This is done as follows:

   For each arriving ACK in slow-start:
     If (cwnd <= max_ssthresh)
        cwnd += MSS;
     else
        K = int(cwnd/(0.5 max_ssthresh));
        cwnd += int(MSS/K);

   Thus during Limited Slow-Start the window is increased by 1/K MSS for
   each arriving ACK, for K = int(cwnd/(0.5 max_ssthresh)), instead of
   by 1 MSS as in the standard slow-start [RFC2581].

   When

     ssthresh < cwnd,

   slow-start is exited, and the sender is in the Congestion Avoidance
   phase.

   Our recommendation would be for max_ssthresh to be set to 100 MSS.
   (This is illustrated in the NS simulator, for snapshots after May 1,
   2002, in the tests "./test-all-tcpHighspeed tcp1A" and "./test-all-
   tcpHighspeed tcpHighspeed1" in the subdirectory "tcl/lib".  Setting
   max_ssthresh to Infinity causes the TCP connection in NS not to use
   Limited Slow-Start.)

   With Limited Slow-Start, when the congestion window is greater than
   max_ssthresh the window is increased by at most 1/2 MSS for each
   arriving ACK, when the congestion window is greater than 1.5
   max_ssthresh the window is increased by at most 1/3 MSS for each
   arriving ACK, and so on.

   With Limited Slow-Start it takes:

     log(max_ssthresh)

   round-trip times to reach a congestion window of max_ssthresh, and it



Floyd                         Experimental                      [Page 3]

draft-ietf-tsvwg-slowstart-00                                August 2002


   takes:

     log(max_ssthresh) + (cwnd - max_ssthresh)/(max_ssthresh/2)

   round-trip times to reach a congestion window of cwnd, for a
   congestion window greater than max_ssthresh.

   Thus, with Limited Slow-Start with max_ssthresh set to 100 MSS, it
   would take 836 round-trip times to reach a congestion window of
   83,000 packets, compared to 16 round-trip times without Limited Slow-
   Start (assuming no packet drops).  With Limited Slow-Start, the
   largest transient queue during slow-start would be 100 packets;
   without Limited Slow-Start, the transient queue during Slow-Start
   would reach more than 32,000 packets.

   By limiting the maximum increase in the congestion window in a round-
   trip time, Limited Slow-Start can reduce the number of drops during
   slow-start, and improve the performance of TCP connections with large
   congestion windows.

3.  Experimental Results

   Tom Dunigan has added Limited Slow-Start to the Linux 2.4.16 Web100
   kernel, and performed experiments comparing TCP with and without
   Limited Slow-Start [D02].  Results so far show improved performance
   for TCPs using Limited Slow-Start.  There are also several
   experiments comparing different values for max_ssthresh.

4.  Related Proposals

   There has been considerable research on mechanisms for the TCP sender
   to learn about the limitations of the available bandwidth, and to
   exit slow-start before receiving a congestion indication from the
   network [VEGAS,H96].  Other proposals set TCP's slow-start parameter
   ssthresh based on information from previous TCP connections to the
   same destination [WS95,G00].  This draft proposes a simple limitation
   on slow-start that can be effective in some cases even in the absence
   of such mechanisms.  The max_ssthresh parameter does not replace
   ssthresh, but is an additional parameter.  Thus, Limited Slow-Start
   could be used in addition to mechanisms for setting ssthresh.

   Rate-based pacing has also been proposed to improve the performance
   of TCP during slow-start [VH97,AD98,KCRP99,ASA00].  We believe that
   rate-based pacing could be of significant benefit, and could be used
   in addition to the Limited Slow-Start in this proposal.

   Appropriate Byte Counting [RFC3465] proposes that TCP increase its
   congestion window as a function of the number of bytes acknowledged,



Floyd                         Experimental                      [Page 4]

draft-ietf-tsvwg-slowstart-00                                August 2002


   rather than as a function of the number of ACKs received.
   Appropriate Byte Counting is largely orthogonal to this proposal for
   Limited Slow-Start.

   Limited Slow-Start is also orthogonal to other proposals to change
   mechanisms for exiting slow-start.  For example, FACK TCP includes an
   overdamping mechanism to decrease the congestion window somewhat more
   aggressively when a loss occurs during slow-start [MM96].  It is also
   true that larger values for the MSS would reduce the size of the
   congestion window in units of MSS needed to fill a given pipe, and
   therefore would reduce the size of the transient queue in units of
   MSS.

5.  Acknowledgements

   This proposal is part of a larger proposal for HighSpeed TCP for TCP
   connections with large congestion windows, and resulted from
   simulations done by Evandro de Souza, in joint work with Deb Agarwal.
   This proposal for Limited Slow-Start drew in part from discussions
   with Tom Kelly, who has used a similar modified slow-start in his own
   research with congestion control for high-bandwidth connections.  We
   also thank Tom Dunigan for his experiments with Limited Slow-Start.

   We thank Andrei Gurtov, Reiner Ludwig, members of the End-to-End
   Research Group, and members of the Transport Area Working Group, for
   feedback on this document.

6.  Normative References

   [RFC2581] M. Allman and V. Paxson, "TCP Congestion Control", RFC
   2581, April 1999.

   [RFC3465] Mark Allman, "TCP Congestion Control with Appropriate Byte
   Counting", RFC 3465, February 2003.

7.  Informative References

   [AD98] Mohit Aron and Peter Druschel, "TCP: Improving Start-up
   Dynamics by Adaptive Timers and Congestion Control"", TR98-318, Rice
   University, 1998.  URL "http://cs-
   tr.cs.rice.edu/Dienst/UI/2.0/Describe/ncstrl.rice_cs/TR98-318/".

   [ASA00] A. Aggarwal, S. Savage, and T. Anderson, "Understanding the
   Performance of TCP Pacing", Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Infocom
   Conference, Tel-Aviv, Israel, March, 2000.  URL
   "http://www.cs.ucsd.edu/~savage/".

   [D02] T. Dunigan, "Floyd's TCP slow-start and AIMD mods", 2002.  URL



Floyd                         Experimental                      [Page 5]

draft-ietf-tsvwg-slowstart-00                                August 2002


   "http://www.csm.ornl.gov/~dunigan/net100/floyd.html".

   [F02] S. Floyd, "Performance Problems with TCP's Slow-Start", 2002.
   URL "http://www.icir.org/floyd/hstcp/slowstart/".

   [G00] A. Gurtov, "TCP Performance in the Presence of Congestion and
   Corruption Losses", Master's Thesis, University of Helsinki,
   Department of Computer Science, Helsinki, December 2000.  URL
   "http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/gurtov/papers/ms_thesis.html".

   [H96] J. C. Hoe, "Improving the Start-up Behavior of a Congestion
   Control Scheme for TCP", SIGCOMM 96, 1996.  URL
   "http://www.acm.org/sigcomm/sigcomm96/program.html".

   [KCRP99] J. Kulik, R. Coulter, D. Rockwell, and C. Partridge, "A
   Simulation Study of Paced TCP", BBN Technical Memorandum No. 1218,
   1999.  URL "http://mimas.lcs.mit.edu/~jokulik/tcppacing.html".

   [MM96] M. Mathis and J. Mahdavi, "Forward Acknowledgment: Refining
   TCP Congestion Control", SIGCOMM, August 1996.

   [VEGAS] Vegas Web Page, University of Arizona.  URL
   "http://www.cs.arizona.edu/protocols/".

   [VH97] Vikram Visweswaraiah and John Heidemann, "Rate Based Pacing
   for TCP", 1997.  URL
   "http://www.isi.edu/lsam/publications/rate_based_pacing/".

   [WS95] G. Wright and W. Stevens, "TCP/IP Illustrated", Volume 2,
   Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1995.

8.  Security Considerations

   This proposal makes no changes to the underlying security of TCP.

8.  IANA Considerations

   There are no IANA considerations regarding this document.

   AUTHORS' ADDRESSES


      Sally Floyd
      Phone: +1 (510) 666-2989
      ICIR (ICSI Center for Internet Research)
      Email: floyd@icir.org
      URL: http://www.icir.org/floyd/




Floyd                         Experimental                      [Page 6]

draft-ietf-tsvwg-slowstart-00                                August 2002


      This draft was first created in June 2002.


















































Floyd                         Experimental                      [Page 7]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.107, available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/