[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]
Versions: 00 01 02 03 RFC 5509
SIMPLE Working Group S. Loreto
Internet-Draft Ericsson
Intended status: Standards Track Jan 15, 2009
Expires: July 19, 2009
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Registration of Instant
Messaging and Presence DNS SRV RRs for the Session Initiation Protocol
(SIP)
draft-loreto-simple-im-srv-label-03
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 19, 2009.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document.
Loreto Expires July 19, 2009 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft IANA SRV label for SIP Jan 2009
Abstract
This document registers with IANA two new DNS SRV Protocol Labels for
resolving Instant Messaging and Presence services with SIP.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. DNS SRV usage of SIP with 'im' and 'pres' URIs . . . . . . . . 3
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5.1. Instant Messaging SRV Protocol Label Registration . . . . . 4
5.2. Presence SRV Protocol Label Registration . . . . . . . . . 5
6. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Loreto Expires July 19, 2009 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft IANA SRV label for SIP Jan 2009
1. Introduction
The Service Record (SRV) [RFC2782] identifies the host(s) that will
support particular services. The DNS is queried for SRV RR in the
general form:
_Service._Proto.Name
Service: the symbolic name of the desired service.
Proto: the protocol of the desired service
Name: the domain name for which this record is valid.
Address Resolution for Instant Messaging and Presence [RFC3861]
provides guidance for locating the services associated with URIs that
employ two Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) [RFC3986]: 'im' for
INSTANT INBOXes [RFC3860] and 'pres' for PRESENTITIES [RFC3859].
In order to ensure that the association between "_im" and "_pres" and
their respective underlying services are deterministic, the IANA has
created two independent registries: the Instant Messaging SRV
Protocol Label registry and the Presence SRV Protocol Label registry.
This document defines and registers the "_sip" protocol label in both
registries so that computer programs can resolve 'im:' and 'pres:'
URIs down to SIP addresses.
Moreover this document explains how the SIP usage for Presence and
Instant Messaging protocol uses SRV.
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
3. DNS SRV usage of SIP with 'im' and 'pres' URIs
Altough there are standard procedures for resolving im and pres URI
(section 3 of [RFC3861]), the labels for SIP are not registered.
Section 5 of [RFC3428] states that if a UA is presented with an IM
URI (e.g."im:fred@example.com") as the address for an instant
message, it SHOULD resolve it to a SIP URI, and place the resulting
URI in the Request-URI of the MESSAGE request before sending".
Following the procedures defined in [RFC3861], in order to resolve
Loreto Expires July 19, 2009 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft IANA SRV label for SIP Jan 2009
the IM URI the UA performs a SRV lookup for:
_im._sip.example.com
Assuming that the example.com domain offers a SIP service for instant
messaging at simple.example.com, this will result in a resolution of
_im._sip.example.com. to simple.example.com. Thus the instant
messaging URI im:fred@example.com would resolve to a SIP URI of
sip:fred@simple.example.com.
Section 5 of [RFC3856] states that procedures defined in [RFC3861]
are also used to resolve the protocol-independent PRES URI for a
presentity (e.g. "pres:fred@example.com") into a SIP URI.
Following the procedures defined in [RFC3861], in order to resolve
the PRES URI the UA performs a SRV lookup for:
_pres._sip.example.com
Assuming that the example.com domain offers a SIP presence service at
simple.example.com, this will result in a resolution of
_pres._sip.example.com. to simple.example.com. Thus the protocol
independent PRES URI pres:fred@example.com would resolve to a SIP URI
of sip:fred@simple.example.com.
4. Security Considerations
This document merely serves for the registration of DNS SRV labels in
the appropriate IANA registry. The document does not specify a
protocol, therefore, there are no security issues associated with it.
5. IANA Considerations
This specification registers a new SRV Protocol Label in each of the
Instant Messaging SRV Protocol Label registry and the Presence SRV
Protocol Label registry, respectively.
5.1. Instant Messaging SRV Protocol Label Registration
Address Resolution for Instant Messaging and Presence[RFC3861]
defines an Instant Messaging SRV Protocol Label registry for
protocols that can provide services that conform to the "_im" SRV
Service label. Because SIP is one such protocol, IANA registers the
"_sip" protocol label in the "Instant Messaging SRV Protocol Label
Registry", as follows:
Loreto Expires July 19, 2009 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft IANA SRV label for SIP Jan 2009
Protocol label: _sip
Specification: RFCXXXX
Description: Instant messaging protocol label for the SIP usage for
Presence and Instant Messaging protocol as defined by [RFC3428].
Registrant Contact: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
5.2. Presence SRV Protocol Label Registration
Address Resolution for Instant Messaging and Presence [RFC3861]
defines a Presence SRV Protocol Label registry for protocols that can
provide services that conform to the "_pres" SRV Service label.
Because SIP usage for Presence and Instant Messaging is one such
protocol, the IANA registers the "_sip" protocol label in the
"Presence SRV Protocol Label Registry", as follows:
Protocol label: _sip
Specification: RFCXXXX
Description: Presence protocol label for the SIP usage for Presence
and Instant Messaging protocol as defined by [RFC3856].
Registrant Contact: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
Note to RFC editor: Please replace RFCXXXX with the RFC number
assigned to this document.
6. Acknowledgments
The need for this registration was discussed with Jon Peterson and
Peter Saint-Andre.
Miguel Garcia reviewed this document on behalf of the Real-time
Applications and Infrastructure (RAI) Area Review Team (ART).
7. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2782] Gulbrandsen, A., Vixie, P., and L. Esibov, "A DNS RR for
specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)", RFC 2782,
February 2000.
[RFC3428] Campbell, B., Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Huitema, C.,
and D. Gurle, "Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension
for Instant Messaging", RFC 3428, December 2002.
[RFC3856] Rosenberg, J., "A Presence Event Package for the Session
Loreto Expires July 19, 2009 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft IANA SRV label for SIP Jan 2009
Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC 3856, August 2004.
[RFC3859] Peterson, J., "Common Profile for Presence (CPP)",
RFC 3859, August 2004.
[RFC3860] Peterson, J., "Common Profile for Instant Messaging
(CPIM)", RFC 3860, August 2004.
[RFC3861] Peterson, J., "Address Resolution for Instant Messaging
and Presence", RFC 3861, August 2004.
[RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
RFC 3986, January 2005.
Author's Address
Salvatore Loreto
Ericsson
Hirsalantie 11
Jorvas 02420
Finland
Email: Salvatore.Loreto@ericsson.com
Loreto Expires July 19, 2009 [Page 6]
Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.98, available from
http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/