[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02 03 RFC 5131

IETF                                                    D. McWalter, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                       Data Connection Ltd
Proposed Status: Standards Track                           March 1, 2007
Expires: September 2, 2007


                            Language Tag MIB
                   draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib-02.txt

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on September 2, 2007.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

Abstract

   This MIB module defines a textual convention to represent BCP 47
   language tags.  The intent is that this textual convention will be
   imported and used in MIB modules that would otherwise define their
   own representation.







McWalter                Expires September 2, 2007               [Page 1]

Internet-Draft                 LANGTAG MIB                    March 2007


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2.  The Internet-Standard Management Framework . . . . . . . . . .  3
   3.  Definitions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   4.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   5.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
   6.  Notes to the RFC editor - remove before publication  . . . . .  5
   7.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
   8.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     8.1   Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     8.2   Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
       Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
       Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . .  7





































McWalter                Expires September 2, 2007               [Page 2]

Internet-Draft                 LANGTAG MIB                    March 2007


1.  Introduction

   This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
   for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
   It defines a textual convention to represent BCP 47 [RFC4646]
   language tags.

   The LangTag textual convention defined by this RFC replaces the
   similar LanguageTag textual convention defined by RFC 2932 [RFC2932].

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",  "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

2.  The Internet-Standard Management Framework

   For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current
   Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of
   RFC 3410 [RFC3410].

   Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
   the Management Information Base or MIB.  MIB objects are generally
   accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP).
   Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the
   Structure of Management Information (SMI).  This memo specifies a MIB
   module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58,
   RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC 2580
   [RFC2580].

3.  Definitions

LANGTAG-TC-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

IMPORTS
    MODULE-IDENTITY, mib-2             FROM SNMPv2-SMI      -- [RFC2578]
    TEXTUAL-CONVENTION                 FROM SNMPv2-TC;      -- [RFC2579]

langTagTcMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
    LAST-UPDATED "200703010000Z" -- 1 March 2007
    ORGANIZATION "IETF Operations and Management (OPS) Area"
    CONTACT-INFO "EMail: ops-area@ietf.org
                  Home page: http://www.ops.ietf.org/"
    DESCRIPTION
            "This MIB module defines a textual convention for
            representing BCP 47 language tags."
    REVISION     "200703010000Z" -- 1 March 2007
    DESCRIPTION
           "Initial revision, published as RFC yyyy.



McWalter                Expires September 2, 2007               [Page 3]

Internet-Draft                 LANGTAG MIB                    March 2007


            Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).  This version of this
            MIB module is part of RFC yyyy; see the RFC itself for full
            legal notices."
-- RFC Ed.: replace yyyy with actual RFC number & remove this note
    ::= { mib-2 XXX }
-- RFC Ed.: replace XXX with IANA-assigned number & remove this note

LangTag ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
   DISPLAY-HINT "1a"
   STATUS      current
   DESCRIPTION
            "A language tag, constructed in accordance with BCP 47.

            Only lowercase characters are allowed.  The purpose of this
            restriction is to provide unique language tags for use as
            indexes.  BCP 47 recommends case conventions for user
            interfaces, but objects using this textual convention MUST
            use only lowercase.

            Values MUST be well-formed language tags, in conformance
            with the definition of well-formed tags in BCP 47.  An
            implementation MAY further limit the values it accepts to
            those permitted by a 'validating' processor, as defined in
            BCP 47.

            In theory, BCP 47 language tags are of unlimited length.
            This language tag is of limited length.  The analysis of
            language tag lengths in BCP 47 confirms that this limit
            will not pose a problem in practice.  In particular, this
            length is greater than the minimum requirements set out in
            section 4.3.1.

            A zero-length language tag is not a valid language tag.
            This can be used to express 'language tag absent' where
            required, for example when used as an index field."
   REFERENCE "RFC 4646 BCP 47"
   SYNTAX      OCTET STRING (SIZE (0 | 2..63))

END


4.  Security Considerations

   This MIB module does not define any management objects.  Instead, it
   defines a textual convention that may be imported by other MIB
   modules and used for object definitions.

   Meaningful security considerations can only be written in the MIB



McWalter                Expires September 2, 2007               [Page 4]

Internet-Draft                 LANGTAG MIB                    March 2007


   modules that define management objects.  This document therefore has
   no impact on the security of the Internet.

5.  IANA Considerations

   LANGTAG-TC-MIB should be rooted under the mib-2 subtree.  IANA is
   requested to assign { mib-2 XXX } to the LANGTAG-TC-MIB module
   specified in this document.

6.  Notes to the RFC editor - remove before publication

   This document should be published simultaneously with IPMCAST-MIB
   (draft-ietf-mboned-ip-mcast-mib).

   This is because LANGTAG-MIB replaces the LanguageTag textual
   convention that is already present in RFC 2932, which will be
   obsoleted by the publication of IPMCAST-MIB.

7.  Acknowledgements

   This MIB module is a reworking of existing material from RFC 2932.

   This module was generated by editing together contributions from
   Randy Presuhn, Dan Romascanu, Bill Fenner, Juergen Schoenwaelder,
   Bert Wijnen, Doug Ewell, and Ira McDonald.

8.  References

8.1  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC2578]  McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
              Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Structure of Management Information
              Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.

   [RFC2579]  McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
              Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Textual Conventions for SMIv2",
              STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.

   [RFC2580]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder,
              "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580,
              April 1999.

   [RFC4646]  Phillips, A. and M. Davis, "Tags for Identifying
              Languages", BCP 47, RFC 4646, September 2006.




McWalter                Expires September 2, 2007               [Page 5]

Internet-Draft                 LANGTAG MIB                    March 2007


8.2  Informative References

   [RFC2932]  McCloghrie, K., Farinacci, D., and D. Thaler, "IPv4
              Multicast Routing MIB", RFC 2932, October 2000.

   [RFC3410]  Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart,
              "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-
              Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002.


Author's Address

   David McWalter (editor)
   Data Connection Ltd
   100 Church Street
   Enfield  EN2 6BQ
   United Kingdom

   Email: dmcw@dataconnection.com
































McWalter                Expires September 2, 2007               [Page 6]

Internet-Draft                 LANGTAG MIB                    March 2007


Intellectual Property Statement

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.


Disclaimer of Validity

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
   THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
   OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).  This document is subject to the
   rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as
   set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.


Acknowledgment

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.




McWalter                Expires September 2, 2007               [Page 7]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.107, available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/