[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [Email] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02 03 04 RFC 4908

INTERNET DRAFT

                                            Kenichi Nagami(INTEC Netcore)
                                                      Satoshi Uda (JAIST)
                                                   Nobuo Ogashiwa (JAIST)
                                               Ryuji Wakikawa(Keio Univ.)
                                               Hiroshi Esaki(Univ. Tokyo)
                                                    Hiroyuki Ohnishi(NTT)


   Multi-homing for small scale fixed network Using Mobile IP and NEMO
         <draft-nagami-mip6-nemo-multihome-fixed-network-00.txt>


Status of this Memo

    This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
    all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.

    Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
    Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
    other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

    Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
    and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
    time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
    material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

    The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
         http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
    The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
         http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

Abstract

    Multi-homing technology improves the availability of host and network
    connectivity. Since the node and network behavior of mobile
    networking and fixed networking are different, the different
    architecture has been discussed and proposed. This document proposes
    the common architecture both for mobile and fixed networking
    environment, using the mobile IP and NEMO. The proposed architecture
    only requires a modification of the mobile IP and NEMO so that
    multiple-CoA can be used. In addition, multiple HAs which are located
    in different place, are required for redundancy.

1. Motivation

    Users of small scale network need to improve the network availability
    and to get load balance of several links by easy method. Multi-homing
    technology is one of solutions to improve the
    availability. Conventional major multi-homing network uses BGP. But
    it has some issues as followings. Therefore, we propose a
    multi-homing architecture using the mobile IP and NEMO for
    small-scale fixed network.


Nagami, et al.                                                  [Page 1]

Internet Draft         Multihoming for fixed network          March 2004

    (1) Increasing route entries in the Internet

       In the multi-homing environments, each user's network needs to
       advertise its address block to all ISPs connected to them. If
       multi-homed user connects only one ISP, the ISP can advertise
       routing information to aggregate them. But some multi-homed user
       needs to connect with different ISPs in preparation for failure of
       ISP. In this case, ISPs need to advertise routing information for
       multi-homed user without aggregation. Therefore, the number of
       routing entries in the Internet is increasing one by one.

    (2) Difficulty to efficiently use multiple links

       It is not easy to control in-coming traffics in the case of the
       conventional multi-homing architecture using BGP. Therefore, load
       balancing of connected links are difficult.

2. Multi-homing for small scale fixed network Using Mobile IP and NEMO
2.1 Mobile network includes fixed network

    NEMO and Mobile IP must work with multi-homing by its nature. This is
    because mobile nodes need to use multiple links for improving the
    availability of network connectivity since the wireless link is not
    always stable. Therefore, we propose that multihoming for fixed nodes
    (routers and hosts) use the framework of NEMO and Mobile IP.

2.2 Overview multi-homing network architecture using Mobile IP

    Figure 1 shows basic multi-homing network architecture. In this
    architecture, a mobile router (MR), which is boarder router of
    multi-homed network, sets up several tunnels between the MR and the
    HA by multiple-CoA registration to provide redundancy and load
    balancing. A HA or a router which the HA belongs advertise user's
    network prefix to ISPs via routing protocol. If HA has several
    multi-homed network, they can advertise an aggregated network prefix
    to ISPs. Therefore, the Internet routing entries do not increase one
    by one when multi-homed user is increased.

    Packets to multi-homed users go to HA and the HA sends packets to MR
    using CoA1 and CoA2. The HA selects a route which CoA is used. The
    route selection algorithm is out of scope of this document. This can
    improve availability of user network and control an in-coming traffic
    between ISP and MR. In the basic architecture, HA1 is single point of
    failure. In order to improve availability of user network, multiple
    HA is needed. This is described in later section.










Nagami, et al.                                                  [Page 2]

Internet Draft         Multihoming for fixed network          March 2004

         HA1
          |
        ISP-A ---- ISP-B
          |          |
          |          |
          +--- MR ---+
          CoA1 | CoA2
               |
        -------+---------
        Multihomed Network

      Fig.1 Basic Architecture

3. Requirements for Mobile IP and NEMO
3.1 Multiple Care-of-Addresses (CoA)

    Multiple Care-of-Addresses needs to improve the availability and to
    control in coming and out going traffic. The current Mobile IPv6 and
    the NEMO Basic Support protocol does not allow to register more than
    one care-of address bound to a home address to the home
    agent. Therefore, [MCoA] is proposed to extend the MIP6
    and the NEMO Basic Support to allow multiple care-of address
    registrations for the particular Home Address.


3.2 Multiple Home Agents

    Multiple Home Agents should be geographically distributed across the
    Internet, for the improvement of service availability and for the
    load balancing of HA. When all the networks that have HA advertise
    the same network prefix to their adjacent router/network, the traffic
    is automatically routed to the nearest Home Agent from the view point
    of routing protocol topology. This operation has been already proven
    operational technology in the area of web server application, such as
    CDN (contents Delivery Network), regarding IGP and EGP.

    In order to operate multiple HAs, all HAs must have the same
    information such as binding information. This is the synchronization
    of database among the HA.  The HAHA protocol [HAHA] introduces the
    binding synchornozation among HAs.  This is the same architecture as
    I-BGP.  The database is synchronized by full-mesh topology. In
    addition, in order to simplify operation of HA, the database is
    synchronized using star topology. This is analogy with I-BGP route
    reflector.











Nagami, et al.                                                  [Page 3]

Internet Draft         Multihoming for fixed network          March 2004

         HA1        HA2
          |          |
        ISP-A ---- ISP-B
          |          |
          |          |
          +--- MR ---+
          CoA1 | CoA2
               |
        -------+---------
        Multihomed Network

      Fig.2 Architecture with HA redundancy

4. Security considerations

    This draft does not raise specific security issues beyond those of
    existing mobile IP and NEMO and routing protocols.

References

    [MCoA] R. Wakikawa, et al, "Multiple Care-of Addresses Registration",
           Internet Draft, IETF. draft-wakikawa-mobileip-multiplecoa-02.txt
           Sep., 2003.

    [HAHA] R. Wakikawa, et al, Inter Home Agents Protocol (HAHA) Internet
           Draft, IETF. draft-wakikawa-mip6-nemo-haha-01.txt, Feb., 2004.



Author's Addresses

    Kenichi Nagami
    INTEC NetCore Inc.
    1-3-3, Shin-suna, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-0075, Japan
    Email: nagami@inetcore.com

    Satoshi Uda
    School of Information Science Japan Advanced Institute of
    Science and Technology
    1-1 Asahidai, Tatsunokuchi, Ishikawa, 923-1292, Japan
    Email: zin@jaist.ac.jp

    Nobuo Ogashiwa
    School of Information Science Japan Advanced Institute of
    Science and Technology
    1-1 Asahidai, Tatsunokuchi, Ishikawa, 923-1292, Japan
    Email: n-ogashi@jaist.ac.jp

    Hiroshi Esaki
    Graduate School of Information Science and Technology,
    The university of Tokyo
    7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan
    Email: hiroshi@wide.ad.jp


Nagami, et al.                                                  [Page 4]

Internet Draft         Multihoming for fixed network          March 2004

    Ryuji Wakikawa
    Keio University and WIDE
    5322 Endo Fujisawa Kanagawa, 252-8520, Japan
    Email:  ryuji@sfc.wide.ad.jp

    Hiroyuki Ohnishi
    NTT Network Service Systems Laboratories, NTT Corporation
    9-11, Midori-Cho, 3-Chome
    Musashino-Shi, Tokyo 180-8585, Japan
    Email: ohnishi.hiroyuki@lab.ntt.co.jp













































Nagami, et al.                                                  [Page 5]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.107, available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/