[Docs] [txt|pdf]

Obsoleted by: 2178 DRAFT STANDARD

Network Working Group                                             J. Moy
Request for Comments: 1583                                 Proteon, Inc.
Obsoletes: 1247                                               March 1994
Category: Standards Track


                             OSPF Version 2



Status of this Memo

    This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
    Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
    improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
    Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
    and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is
    unlimited.

Abstract

    This memo documents version 2 of the OSPF protocol.  OSPF is a
    link-state routing protocol.  It is designed to be run internal to a
    single Autonomous System.  Each OSPF router maintains an identical
    database describing the Autonomous System's topology.  From this
    database, a routing table is calculated by constructing a shortest-
    path tree.

    OSPF recalculates routes quickly in the face of topological changes,
    utilizing a minimum of routing protocol traffic.  OSPF provides
    support for equal-cost multipath.  Separate routes can be calculated
    for each IP Type of Service.  An area routing capability is
    provided, enabling an additional level of routing protection and a
    reduction in routing protocol traffic.  In addition, all OSPF
    routing protocol exchanges are authenticated.

    OSPF Version 2 was originally documented in RFC 1247. The
    differences between RFC 1247 and this memo are explained in Appendix
    E. The differences consist of bug fixes and clarifications, and are
    backward-compatible in nature. Implementations of RFC 1247 and of
    this memo will interoperate.

    Please send comments to ospf@gated.cornell.edu.








Moy                                                             [Page 1]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


Table of Contents

    1       Introduction ........................................... 5
    1.1     Protocol Overview ...................................... 5
    1.2     Definitions of commonly used terms ..................... 6
    1.3     Brief history of link-state routing technology ......... 9
    1.4     Organization of this document .......................... 9
    2       The Topological Database .............................. 10
    2.1     The shortest-path tree ................................ 13
    2.2     Use of external routing information ................... 16
    2.3     Equal-cost multipath .................................. 20
    2.4     TOS-based routing ..................................... 20
    3       Splitting the AS into Areas ........................... 21
    3.1     The backbone of the Autonomous System ................. 22
    3.2     Inter-area routing .................................... 22
    3.3     Classification of routers ............................. 23
    3.4     A sample area configuration ........................... 24
    3.5     IP subnetting support ................................. 30
    3.6     Supporting stub areas ................................. 31
    3.7     Partitions of areas ................................... 32
    4       Functional Summary .................................... 34
    4.1     Inter-area routing .................................... 35
    4.2     AS external routes .................................... 35
    4.3     Routing protocol packets .............................. 35
    4.4     Basic implementation requirements ..................... 38
    4.5     Optional OSPF capabilities ............................ 39
    5       Protocol data structures .............................. 41
    6       The Area Data Structure ............................... 42
    7       Bringing Up Adjacencies ............................... 45
    7.1     The Hello Protocol .................................... 45
    7.2     The Synchronization of Databases ...................... 46
    7.3     The Designated Router ................................. 47
    7.4     The Backup Designated Router .......................... 48
    7.5     The graph of adjacencies .............................. 49
    8       Protocol Packet Processing ............................ 50
    8.1     Sending protocol packets .............................. 51
    8.2     Receiving protocol packets ............................ 53
    9       The Interface Data Structure .......................... 55
    9.1     Interface states ...................................... 58
    9.2     Events causing interface state changes ................ 61
    9.3     The Interface state machine ........................... 62
    9.4     Electing the Designated Router ........................ 65
    9.5     Sending Hello packets ................................. 67
    9.5.1   Sending Hello packets on non-broadcast networks ....... 68
    10      The Neighbor Data Structure ........................... 69
    10.1    Neighbor states ....................................... 72
    10.2    Events causing neighbor state changes ................. 75
    10.3    The Neighbor state machine ............................ 77



Moy                                                             [Page 2]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    10.4    Whether to become adjacent ............................ 83
    10.5    Receiving Hello Packets ............................... 83
    10.6    Receiving Database Description Packets ................ 86
    10.7    Receiving Link State Request Packets .................. 89
    10.8    Sending Database Description Packets .................. 89
    10.9    Sending Link State Request Packets .................... 90
    10.10   An Example ............................................ 91
    11      The Routing Table Structure ........................... 93
    11.1    Routing table lookup .................................. 96
    11.2    Sample routing table, without areas ................... 97
    11.3    Sample routing table, with areas ...................... 98
    12      Link State Advertisements ............................ 100
    12.1    The Link State Advertisement Header .................. 101
    12.1.1  LS age ............................................... 102
    12.1.2  Options .............................................. 102
    12.1.3  LS type .............................................. 103
    12.1.4  Link State ID ........................................ 103
    12.1.5  Advertising Router ................................... 105
    12.1.6  LS sequence number ................................... 105
    12.1.7  LS checksum .......................................... 106
    12.2    The link state database .............................. 107
    12.3    Representation of TOS ................................ 108
    12.4    Originating link state advertisements ................ 109
    12.4.1  Router links ......................................... 112
    12.4.2  Network links ........................................ 118
    12.4.3  Summary links ........................................ 120
    12.4.4  Originating summary links into stub areas ............ 123
    12.4.5  AS external links .................................... 124
    13      The Flooding Procedure ............................... 126
    13.1    Determining which link state is newer ................ 130
    13.2    Installing link state advertisements in the database . 130
    13.3    Next step in the flooding procedure .................. 131
    13.4    Receiving self-originated link state ................. 134
    13.5    Sending Link State Acknowledgment packets ............ 135
    13.6    Retransmitting link state advertisements ............. 136
    13.7    Receiving link state acknowledgments ................. 138
    14      Aging The Link State Database ........................ 139
    14.1    Premature aging of advertisements .................... 139
    15      Virtual Links ........................................ 140
    16      Calculation Of The Routing Table ..................... 142
    16.1    Calculating the shortest-path tree for an area ....... 143
    16.1.1  The next hop calculation ............................. 149
    16.2    Calculating the inter-area routes .................... 150
    16.3    Examining transit areas' summary links ............... 152
    16.4    Calculating AS external routes ....................... 154
    16.5    Incremental updates -- summary link advertisements ... 156
    16.6    Incremental updates -- AS external link advertisements 157
    16.7    Events generated as a result of routing table changes  157



Moy                                                             [Page 3]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    16.8    Equal-cost multipath ................................. 158
    16.9    Building the non-zero-TOS portion of the routing table 158
            Footnotes ............................................ 161
            References ........................................... 164
    A       OSPF data formats .................................... 166
    A.1     Encapsulation of OSPF packets ........................ 166
    A.2     The Options field .................................... 168
    A.3     OSPF Packet Formats .................................. 170
    A.3.1   The OSPF packet header ............................... 171
    A.3.2   The Hello packet ..................................... 173
    A.3.3   The Database Description packet ...................... 175
    A.3.4   The Link State Request packet ........................ 177
    A.3.5   The Link State Update packet ......................... 179
    A.3.6   The Link State Acknowledgment packet ................. 181
    A.4     Link state advertisement formats ..................... 183
    A.4.1   The Link State Advertisement header .................. 184
    A.4.2   Router links advertisements .......................... 186
    A.4.3   Network links advertisements ......................... 190
    A.4.4   Summary link advertisements .......................... 192
    A.4.5   AS external link advertisements ...................... 194
    B       Architectural Constants .............................. 196
    C       Configurable Constants ............................... 198
    C.1     Global parameters .................................... 198
    C.2     Area parameters ...................................... 198
    C.3     Router interface parameters .......................... 200
    C.4     Virtual link parameters .............................. 202
    C.5     Non-broadcast, multi-access network parameters ....... 203
    C.6     Host route parameters ................................ 203
    D       Authentication ....................................... 205
    D.1     AuType 0 -- No authentication ........................ 205
    D.2     AuType 1 -- Simple password .......................... 205
    E       Differences from RFC 1247 ............................ 207
    E.1     A fix for a problem with OSPF Virtual links .......... 207
    E.2     Supporting supernetting and subnet 0 ................. 208
    E.3     Obsoleting LSInfinity in router links advertisements . 209
    E.4     TOS encoding updated ................................. 209
    E.5     Summarizing routes into transit areas ................ 210
    E.6     Summarizing routes into stub areas ................... 210
    E.7     Flushing anomalous network links advertisements ...... 210
    E.8     Required Statistics appendix deleted ................. 211
    E.9     Other changes ........................................ 211
    F.      An algorithm for assigning Link State IDs ............ 213
            Security Considerations .............................. 216
            Author's Address ..................................... 216







Moy                                                             [Page 4]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


1.  Introduction

    This document is a specification of the Open Shortest Path First
    (OSPF) TCP/IP internet routing protocol.  OSPF is classified as an
    Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP).  This means that it distributes
    routing information between routers belonging to a single Autonomous
    System.  The OSPF protocol is based on link-state or SPF technology.
    This is a departure from the Bellman-Ford base used by traditional
    TCP/IP internet routing protocols.

    The OSPF protocol was developed by the OSPF working group of the
    Internet Engineering Task Force.  It has been designed expressly for
    the TCP/IP internet environment, including explicit support for IP
    subnetting, TOS-based routing and the tagging of externally-derived
    routing information.  OSPF also provides for the authentication of
    routing updates, and utilizes IP multicast when sending/receiving
    the updates.  In addition, much work has been done to produce a
    protocol that responds quickly to topology changes, yet involves
    small amounts of routing protocol traffic.

    The author would like to thank Fred Baker, Jeffrey Burgan, Rob
    Coltun, Dino Farinacci, Vince Fuller, Phanindra Jujjavarapu, Milo
    Medin, Kannan Varadhan and the rest of the OSPF working group for
    the ideas and support they have given to this project.

    1.1.  Protocol overview

        OSPF routes IP packets based solely on the destination IP
        address and IP Type of Service found in the IP packet header.
        IP packets are routed "as is" -- they are not encapsulated in
        any further protocol headers as they transit the Autonomous
        System.  OSPF is a dynamic routing protocol.  It quickly detects
        topological changes in the AS (such as router interface
        failures) and calculates new loop-free routes after a period of
        convergence.  This period of convergence is short and involves a
        minimum of routing traffic.

        In a link-state routing protocol, each router maintains a
        database describing the Autonomous System's topology.  Each
        participating router has an identical database.  Each individual
        piece of this database is a particular router's local state
        (e.g., the router's usable interfaces and reachable neighbors).
        The router distributes its local state throughout the Autonomous
        System by flooding.

        All routers run the exact same algorithm, in parallel.  From the
        topological database, each router constructs a tree of shortest
        paths with itself as root.  This shortest-path tree gives the



Moy                                                             [Page 5]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        route to each destination in the Autonomous System.  Externally
        derived routing information appears on the tree as leaves.

        OSPF calculates separate routes for each Type of Service (TOS).
        When several equal-cost routes to a destination exist, traffic
        is distributed equally among them.  The cost of a route is
        described by a single dimensionless metric.

        OSPF allows sets of networks to be grouped together.  Such a
        grouping is called an area.  The topology of an area is hidden
        from the rest of the Autonomous System.  This information hiding
        enables a significant reduction in routing traffic.  Also,
        routing within the area is determined only by the area's own
        topology, lending the area protection from bad routing data.  An
        area is a generalization of an IP subnetted network.

        OSPF enables the flexible configuration of IP subnets.  Each
        route distributed by OSPF has a destination and mask.  Two
        different subnets of the same IP network number may have
        different sizes (i.e., different masks).  This is commonly
        referred to as variable length subnetting.  A packet is routed
        to the best (i.e., longest or most specific) match.  Host routes
        are considered to be subnets whose masks are "all ones"
        (0xffffffff).

        All OSPF protocol exchanges are authenticated.  This means that
        only trusted routers can participate in the Autonomous System's
        routing.  A variety of authentication schemes can be used; a
        single authentication scheme is configured for each area.  This
        enables some areas to use much stricter authentication than
        others.

        Externally derived routing data (e.g., routes learned from the
        Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP)) is passed transparently
        throughout the Autonomous System.  This externally derived data
        is kept separate from the OSPF protocol's link state data.  Each
        external route can also be tagged by the advertising router,
        enabling the passing of additional information between routers
        on the boundaries of the Autonomous System.


    1.2.  Definitions of commonly used terms

        This section provides definitions for terms that have a specific
        meaning to the OSPF protocol and that are used throughout the
        text.  The reader unfamiliar with the Internet Protocol Suite is
        referred to [RS-85-153] for an introduction to IP.




Moy                                                             [Page 6]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        Router
            A level three Internet Protocol packet switch.  Formerly
            called a gateway in much of the IP literature.

        Autonomous System
            A group of routers exchanging routing information via a
            common routing protocol.  Abbreviated as AS.

        Interior Gateway Protocol
            The routing protocol spoken by the routers belonging to an
            Autonomous system.  Abbreviated as IGP.  Each Autonomous
            System has a single IGP.  Separate Autonomous Systems may be
            running different IGPs.

        Router ID
            A 32-bit number assigned to each router running the OSPF
            protocol.  This number uniquely identifies the router within
            an Autonomous System.

        Network
            In this memo, an IP network/subnet/supernet.  It is possible
            for one physical network to be assigned multiple IP
            network/subnet numbers.  We consider these to be separate
            networks.  Point-to-point physical networks are an exception
            - they are considered a single network no matter how many
            (if any at all) IP network/subnet numbers are assigned to
            them.

        Network mask
            A 32-bit number indicating the range of IP addresses
            residing on a single IP network/subnet/supernet.  This
            specification displays network masks as hexadecimal numbers.
            For example, the network mask for a class C IP network is
            displayed as 0xffffff00.  Such a mask is often displayed
            elsewhere in the literature as 255.255.255.0.

        Multi-access networks
            Those physical networks that support the attachment of
            multiple (more than two) routers.  Each pair of routers on
            such a network is assumed to be able to communicate directly
            (e.g., multi-drop networks are excluded).

        Interface
            The connection between a router and one of its attached
            networks.  An interface has state information associated
            with it, which is obtained from the underlying lower level
            protocols and the routing protocol itself.  An interface to
            a network has associated with it a single IP address and



Moy                                                             [Page 7]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            mask (unless the network is an unnumbered point-to-point
            network).  An interface is sometimes also referred to as a
            link.

        Neighboring routers
            Two routers that have interfaces to a common network.  On
            multi-access networks, neighbors are dynamically discovered
            by OSPF's Hello Protocol.

        Adjacency
            A relationship formed between selected neighboring routers
            for the purpose of exchanging routing information.  Not
            every pair of neighboring routers become adjacent.

        Link state advertisement
            Describes the local state of a router or network.  This
            includes the state of the router's interfaces and
            adjacencies.  Each link state advertisement is flooded
            throughout the routing domain.  The collected link state
            advertisements of all routers and networks forms the
            protocol's topological database.

        Hello Protocol
            The part of the OSPF protocol used to establish and maintain
            neighbor relationships.  On multi-access networks the Hello
            Protocol can also dynamically discover neighboring routers.

        Designated Router
            Each multi-access network that has at least two attached
            routers has a Designated Router.  The Designated Router
            generates a link state advertisement for the multi-access
            network and has other special responsibilities in the
            running of the protocol.  The Designated Router is elected
            by the Hello Protocol.

            The Designated Router concept enables a reduction in the
            number of adjacencies required on a multi-access network.
            This in turn reduces the amount of routing protocol traffic
            and the size of the topological database.

        Lower-level protocols
            The underlying network access protocols that provide
            services to the Internet Protocol and in turn the OSPF
            protocol.  Examples of these are the X.25 packet and frame
            levels for X.25 PDNs, and the ethernet data link layer for
            ethernets.





Moy                                                             [Page 8]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    1.3.  Brief history of link-state routing technology

        OSPF is a link state routing protocol.  Such protocols are also
        referred to in the literature as SPF-based or distributed-
        database protocols.  This section gives a brief description of
        the developments in link-state technology that have influenced
        the OSPF protocol.

        The first link-state routing protocol was developed for use in
        the ARPANET packet switching network.  This protocol is
        described in [McQuillan].  It has formed the starting point for
        all other link-state protocols.  The homogeneous Arpanet
        environment, i.e., single-vendor packet switches connected by
        synchronous serial lines, simplified the design and
        implementation of the original protocol.

        Modifications to this protocol were proposed in [Perlman].
        These modifications dealt with increasing the fault tolerance of
        the routing protocol through, among other things, adding a
        checksum to the link state advertisements (thereby detecting
        database corruption).  The paper also included means for
        reducing the routing traffic overhead in a link-state protocol.
        This was accomplished by introducing mechanisms which enabled
        the interval between link state advertisement originations to be
        increased by an order of magnitude.

        A link-state algorithm has also been proposed for use as an ISO
        IS-IS routing protocol.  This protocol is described in [DEC].
        The protocol includes methods for data and routing traffic
        reduction when operating over broadcast networks.  This is
        accomplished by election of a Designated Router for each
        broadcast network, which then originates a link state
        advertisement for the network.

        The OSPF subcommittee of the IETF has extended this work in
        developing the OSPF protocol.  The Designated Router concept has
        been greatly enhanced to further reduce the amount of routing
        traffic required.  Multicast capabilities are utilized for
        additional routing bandwidth reduction.  An area routing scheme
        has been developed enabling information
        hiding/protection/reduction.  Finally, the algorithm has been
        modified for efficient operation in TCP/IP internets.


    1.4.  Organization of this document

        The first three sections of this specification give a general
        overview of the protocol's capabilities and functions.  Sections



Moy                                                             [Page 9]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        4-16 explain the protocol's mechanisms in detail.  Packet
        formats, protocol constants and configuration items are
        specified in the appendices.

        Labels such as HelloInterval encountered in the text refer to
        protocol constants.  They may or may not be configurable.  The
        architectural constants are explained in Appendix B.  The
        configurable constants are explained in Appendix C.

        The detailed specification of the protocol is presented in terms
        of data structures.  This is done in order to make the
        explanation more precise.  Implementations of the protocol are
        required to support the functionality described, but need not
        use the precise data structures that appear in this memo.


2.  The Topological Database

    The Autonomous System's topological database describes a directed
    graph.  The vertices of the graph consist of routers and networks.
    A graph edge connects two routers when they are attached via a
    physical point-to-point network.  An edge connecting a router to a
    network indicates that the router has an interface on the network.

    The vertices of the graph can be further typed according to
    function.  Only some of these types carry transit data traffic; that
    is, traffic that is neither locally originated nor locally destined.
    Vertices that can carry transit traffic are indicated on the graph
    by having both incoming and outgoing edges.



                     Vertex type   Vertex name    Transit?
                     _____________________________________
                     1             Router         yes
                     2             Network        yes
                     3             Stub network   no


                          Table 1: OSPF vertex types.


    OSPF supports the following types of physical networks:


    Point-to-point networks
        A network that joins a single pair of routers.  A 56Kb serial
        line is an example of a point-to-point network.



Moy                                                            [Page 10]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    Broadcast networks
        Networks supporting many (more than two) attached routers,
        together with the capability to address a single physical
        message to all of the attached routers (broadcast).  Neighboring
        routers are discovered dynamically on these nets using OSPF's
        Hello Protocol.  The Hello Protocol itself takes advantage of
        the broadcast capability.  The protocol makes further use of
        multicast capabilities, if they exist.  An ethernet is an
        example of a broadcast network.

    Non-broadcast networks
        Networks supporting many (more than two) routers, but having no
        broadcast capability.  Neighboring routers are also discovered
        on these nets using OSPF's Hello Protocol.  However, due to the
        lack of broadcast capability, some configuration information is
        necessary for the correct operation of the Hello Protocol.  On
        these networks, OSPF protocol packets that are normally
        multicast need to be sent to each neighboring router, in turn.
        An X.25 Public Data Network (PDN) is an example of a non-
        broadcast network.


    The neighborhood of each network node in the graph depends on
    whether the network has multi-access capabilities (either broadcast
    or non-broadcast) and, if so, the number of routers having an
    interface to the network.  The three cases are depicted in Figure 1.
    Rectangles indicate routers.  Circles and oblongs indicate multi-
    access networks.  Router names are prefixed with the letters RT and
    network names with the letter N.  Router interface names are
    prefixed by the letter I.  Lines between routers indicate point-to-
    point networks.  The left side of the figure shows a network with
    its connected routers, with the resulting graph shown on the right.

    Two routers joined by a point-to-point network are represented in
    the directed graph as being directly connected by a pair of edges,
    one in each direction.  Interfaces to physical point-to-point
    networks need not be assigned IP addresses.  Such a point-to-point
    network is called unnumbered.  The graphical representation of
    point-to-point networks is designed so that unnumbered networks can
    be supported naturally.  When interface addresses exist, they are
    modelled as stub routes.  Note that each router would then have a
    stub connection to the other router's interface address (see Figure
    1).

    When multiple routers are attached to a multi-access network, the
    directed graph shows all routers bidirectionally connected to the
    network vertex (again, see Figure 1).  If only a single router is
    attached to a multi-access network, the network will appear in the



Moy                                                            [Page 11]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994





                                                  **FROM**

                                           *      |RT1|RT2|
                +---+Ia    +---+           *   ------------
                |RT1|------|RT2|           T   RT1|   | X |
                +---+    Ib+---+           O   RT2| X |   |
                                           *    Ia|   | X |
                                           *    Ib| X |   |

                     Physical point-to-point networks

                                                  **FROM**
                +---+      +---+
                |RT3|      |RT4|              |RT3|RT4|RT5|RT6|N2 |
                +---+      +---+        *  ------------------------
                  |    N2    |          *  RT3|   |   |   |   | X |
            +----------------------+    T  RT4|   |   |   |   | X |
                  |          |          O  RT5|   |   |   |   | X |
                +---+      +---+        *  RT6|   |   |   |   | X |
                |RT5|      |RT6|        *   N2| X | X | X | X |   |
                +---+      +---+

                          Multi-access networks

                                                  **FROM**
                      +---+                *
                      |RT7|                *      |RT7| N3|
                      +---+                T   ------------
                        |                  O   RT7|   |   |
            +----------------------+       *    N3| X |   |
                       N3                  *

                       Stub multi-access networks



                    Figure 1: Network map components

             Networks and routers are represented by vertices.
             An edge connects Vertex A to Vertex B iff the
             intersection of Column A and Row B is marked with
                                  an X.






Moy                                                            [Page 12]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    directed graph as a stub connection.

    Each network (stub or transit) in the graph has an IP address and
    associated network mask.  The mask indicates the number of nodes on
    the network.  Hosts attached directly to routers (referred to as
    host routes) appear on the graph as stub networks.  The network mask
    for a host route is always 0xffffffff, which indicates the presence
    of a single node.

    Figure 2 shows a sample map of an Autonomous System.  The rectangle
    labelled H1 indicates a host, which has a SLIP connection to Router
    RT12.  Router RT12 is therefore advertising a host route.  Lines
    between routers indicate physical point-to-point networks.  The only
    point-to-point network that has been assigned interface addresses is
    the one joining Routers RT6 and RT10.  Routers RT5 and RT7 have EGP
    connections to other Autonomous Systems.  A set of EGP-learned
    routes have been displayed for both of these routers.

    A cost is associated with the output side of each router interface.
    This cost is configurable by the system administrator.  The lower
    the cost, the more likely the interface is to be used to forward
    data traffic.  Costs are also associated with the externally derived
    routing data (e.g., the EGP-learned routes).

    The directed graph resulting from the map in Figure 2 is depicted in
    Figure 3.  Arcs are labelled with the cost of the corresponding
    router output interface.  Arcs having no labelled cost have a cost
    of 0.  Note that arcs leading from networks to routers always have
    cost 0; they are significant nonetheless.  Note also that the
    externally derived routing data appears on the graph as stubs.

    The topological database (or what has been referred to above as the
    directed graph) is pieced together from link state advertisements
    generated by the routers.  The neighborhood of each transit vertex
    is represented in a single, separate link state advertisement.
    Figure 4 shows graphically the link state representation of the two
    kinds of transit vertices: routers and multi-access networks.
    Router RT12 has an interface to two broadcast networks and a SLIP
    line to a host.  Network N6 is a broadcast network with three
    attached routers.  The cost of all links from Network N6 to its
    attached routers is 0.  Note that the link state advertisement for
    Network N6 is actually generated by one of the attached routers: the
    router that has been elected Designated Router for the network.

    2.1.  The shortest-path tree

        When no OSPF areas are configured, each router in the Autonomous
        System has an identical topological database, leading to an



Moy                                                            [Page 13]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994



                 +
                 | 3+---+                     N12      N14
               N1|--|RT1|\ 1                    \ N13 /
                 |  +---+ \                     8\ |8/8
                 +         \ ____                 \|/
                            /    \   1+---+8    8+---+6
                           *  N3  *---|RT4|------|RT5|--------+
                            \____/    +---+      +---+        |
                  +         /   |                  |7         |
                  | 3+---+ /    |                  |          |
                N2|--|RT2|/1    |1                 |6         |
                  |  +---+    +---+8            6+---+        |
                  +           |RT3|--------------|RT6|        |
                              +---+              +---+        |
                                |2               Ia|7         |
                                |                  |          |
                           +---------+             |          |
                               N4                  |          |
                                                   |          |
                                                   |          |
                       N11                         |          |
                   +---------+                     |          |
                        |                          |          |    N12
                        |3                         |          |6 2/
                      +---+                        |        +---+/
                      |RT9|                        |        |RT7|---N15
                      +---+                        |        +---+ 9
                        |1                   +     |          |1
                       _|__                  |   Ib|5       __|_
                      /    \      1+----+2   |  3+----+1   /    \
                     *  N9  *------|RT11|----|---|RT10|---*  N6  *
                      \____/       +----+    |   +----+    \____/
                        |                    |                |
                        |1                   +                |1
             +--+   10+----+                N8              +---+
             |H1|-----|RT12|                                |RT8|
             +--+SLIP +----+                                +---+
                        |2                                    |4
                        |                                     |
                   +---------+                            +--------+
                       N10                                    N7

                    Figure 2: A sample Autonomous System







Moy                                                            [Page 14]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


                                **FROM**

                 |RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|
                 |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10|11|12|N3|N6|N8|N9|
              ----- ---------------------------------------------
              RT1|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |  |
              RT2|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |  |
              RT3|  |  |  |  |  |6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |  |
              RT4|  |  |  |  |8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |  |
              RT5|  |  |  |8 |  |6 |6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
              RT6|  |  |8 |  |7 |  |  |  |  |5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
              RT7|  |  |  |  |6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |
          *   RT8|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |
          *   RT9|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |
          T  RT10|  |  |  |  |  |7 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |0 |  |
          O  RT11|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |0 |
          *  RT12|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |
          *    N1|3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
               N2|  |3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
               N3|1 |1 |1 |1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
               N4|  |  |2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
               N6|  |  |  |  |  |  |1 |1 |  |1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
               N7|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
               N8|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |3 |2 |  |  |  |  |  |
               N9|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |1 |  |1 |1 |  |  |  |  |
              N10|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |2 |  |  |  |  |
              N11|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
              N12|  |  |  |  |8 |  |2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
              N13|  |  |  |  |8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
              N14|  |  |  |  |8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
              N15|  |  |  |  |  |  |9 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
               H1|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |10|  |  |  |  |


                     Figure 3: The resulting directed graph

                 Networks and routers are represented by vertices.
                 An edge of cost X connects Vertex A to Vertex B iff
                 the intersection of Column A and Row B is marked
                                     with an X.











Moy                                                            [Page 15]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


                     **FROM**                       **FROM**

                  |RT12|N9|N10|H1|             |RT9|RT11|RT12|N9|
           *  --------------------          *  ----------------------
           *  RT12|    |  |   |  |          *   RT9|   |    |    |0 |
           T    N9|1   |  |   |  |          T  RT11|   |    |    |0 |
           O   N10|2   |  |   |  |          O  RT12|   |    |    |0 |
           *    H1|10  |  |   |  |          *    N9|   |    |    |  |
           *                                *
                RT12's router links            N9's network links
                   advertisement                  advertisement

                  Figure 4: Individual link state components

              Networks and routers are represented by vertices.
              An edge of cost X connects Vertex A to Vertex B iff
              the intersection of Column A and Row B is marked
                                  with an X.

        identical graphical representation.  A router generates its
        routing table from this graph by calculating a tree of shortest
        paths with the router itself as root.  Obviously, the shortest-
        path tree depends on the router doing the calculation.  The
        shortest-path tree for Router RT6 in our example is depicted in
        Figure 5.

        The tree gives the entire route to any destination network or
        host.  However, only the next hop to the destination is used in
        the forwarding process.  Note also that the best route to any
        router has also been calculated.  For the processing of external
        data, we note the next hop and distance to any router
        advertising external routes.  The resulting routing table for
        Router RT6 is pictured in Table 2.  Note that there is a
        separate route for each end of a numbered serial line (in this
        case, the serial line between Routers RT6 and RT10).


        Routes to networks belonging to other AS'es (such as N12) appear
        as dashed lines on the shortest path tree in Figure 5.  Use of
        this externally derived routing information is considered in the
        next section.


    2.2.  Use of external routing information

        After the tree is created the external routing information is
        examined.  This external routing information may originate from
        another routing protocol such as EGP, or be statically



Moy                                                            [Page 16]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994



                                RT6(origin)
                    RT5 o------------o-----------o Ib
                       /|\    6      |\     7
                     8/8|8\          | \
                     /  |  \         |  \
                    o   |   o        |   \7
                   N12  o  N14       |    \
                       N13        2  |     \
                            N4 o-----o RT3  \
                                    /        \    5
                                  1/     RT10 o-------o Ia
                                  /           |\
                       RT4 o-----o N3        3| \1
                                /|            |  \ N6     RT7
                               / |         N8 o   o---------o
                              /  |            |   |        /|
                         RT2 o   o RT1        |   |      2/ |9
                            /    |            |   |RT8   /  |
                           /3    |3      RT11 o   o     o   o
                          /      |            |   |    N12 N15
                      N2 o       o N1        1|   |4
                                              |   |
                                           N9 o   o N7
                                             /|
                                            / |
                        N11      RT9       /  |RT12
                         o--------o-------o   o--------o H1
                             3                |   10
                                              |2
                                              |
                                              o N10


                     Figure 5: The SPF tree for Router RT6

              Edges that are not marked with a cost have a cost of
              of zero (these are network-to-router links). Routes
              to networks N12-N15 are external information that is
                         considered in Section 2.2











Moy                                                            [Page 17]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


                   Destination   Next  Hop   Distance
                   __________________________________
                   N1            RT3         10
                   N2            RT3         10
                   N3            RT3         7
                   N4            RT3         8
                   Ib            *           7
                   Ia            RT10        12
                   N6            RT10        8
                   N7            RT10        12
                   N8            RT10        10
                   N9            RT10        11
                   N10           RT10        13
                   N11           RT10        14
                   H1            RT10        21
                   __________________________________
                   RT5           RT5         6
                   RT7           RT10        8


    Table 2: The portion of Router RT6's routing table listing local
                             destinations.

        configured (static routes).  Default routes can also be included
        as part of the Autonomous System's external routing information.

        External routing information is flooded unaltered throughout the
        AS.  In our example, all the routers in the Autonomous System
        know that Router RT7 has two external routes, with metrics 2 and
        9.

        OSPF supports two types of external metrics.  Type 1 external
        metrics are equivalent to the link state metric.  Type 2
        external metrics are greater than the cost of any path internal
        to the AS.  Use of Type 2 external metrics assumes that routing
        between AS'es is the major cost of routing a packet, and
        eliminates the need for conversion of external costs to internal
        link state metrics.

        As an example of Type 1 external metric processing, suppose that
        the Routers RT7 and RT5 in Figure 2 are advertising Type 1
        external metrics.  For each external route, the distance from
        Router RT6 is calculated as the sum of the external route's cost
        and the distance from Router RT6 to the advertising router.  For
        every external destination, the router advertising the shortest
        route is discovered, and the next hop to the advertising router
        becomes the next hop to the destination.




Moy                                                            [Page 18]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        Both Router RT5 and RT7 are advertising an external route to
        destination Network N12.  Router RT7 is preferred since it is
        advertising N12 at a distance of 10 (8+2) to Router RT6, which
        is better than Router RT5's 14 (6+8).  Table 3 shows the entries
        that are added to the routing table when external routes are
        examined:



                         Destination   Next  Hop   Distance
                         __________________________________
                         N12           RT10        10
                         N13           RT5         14
                         N14           RT5         14
                         N15           RT10        17


                 Table 3: The portion of Router RT6's routing table
                           listing external destinations.


        Processing of Type 2 external metrics is simpler.  The AS
        boundary router advertising the smallest external metric is
        chosen, regardless of the internal distance to the AS boundary
        router.  Suppose in our example both Router RT5 and Router RT7
        were advertising Type 2 external routes.  Then all traffic
        destined for Network N12 would be forwarded to Router RT7, since
        2 < 8.  When several equal-cost Type 2 routes exist, the
        internal distance to the advertising routers is used to break
        the tie.

        Both Type 1 and Type 2 external metrics can be present in the AS
        at the same time.  In that event, Type 1 external metrics always
        take precedence.

        This section has assumed that packets destined for external
        destinations are always routed through the advertising AS
        boundary router.  This is not always desirable.  For example,
        suppose in Figure 2 there is an additional router attached to
        Network N6, called Router RTX.  Suppose further that RTX does
        not participate in OSPF routing, but does exchange EGP
        information with the AS boundary router RT7.  Then, Router RT7
        would end up advertising OSPF external routes for all
        destinations that should be routed to RTX.  An extra hop will
        sometimes be introduced if packets for these destinations need
        always be routed first to Router RT7 (the advertising router).

        To deal with this situation, the OSPF protocol allows an AS



Moy                                                            [Page 19]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        boundary router to specify a "forwarding address" in its
        external advertisements.  In the above example, Router RT7 would
        specify RTX's IP address as the "forwarding address" for all
        those destinations whose packets should be routed directly to
        RTX.

        The "forwarding address" has one other application.  It enables
        routers in the Autonomous System's interior to function as
        "route servers".  For example, in Figure 2 the router RT6 could
        become a route server, gaining external routing information
        through a combination of static configuration and external
        routing protocols.  RT6 would then start advertising itself as
        an AS boundary router, and would originate a collection of OSPF
        external advertisements.  In each external advertisement, Router
        RT6 would specify the correct Autonomous System exit point to
        use for the destination through appropriate setting of the
        advertisement's "forwarding address" field.


    2.3.  Equal-cost multipath

        The above discussion has been simplified by considering only a
        single route to any destination.  In reality, if multiple
        equal-cost routes to a destination exist, they are all
        discovered and used.  This requires no conceptual changes to the
        algorithm, and its discussion is postponed until we consider the
        tree-building process in more detail.

        With equal cost multipath, a router potentially has several
        available next hops towards any given destination.


    2.4.  TOS-based routing

        OSPF can calculate a separate set of routes for each IP Type of
        Service. This means that, for any destination, there can
        potentially be multiple routing table entries, one for each IP
        TOS. The IP TOS values are represented in OSPF exactly as they
        appear in the IP packet header.

        Up to this point, all examples shown have assumed that routes do
        not vary on TOS.  In order to differentiate routes based on TOS,
        separate interface costs can be configured for each TOS.  For
        example, in Figure 2 there could be multiple costs (one for each
        TOS) listed for each interface.  A cost for TOS 0 must always be
        specified.

        When interface costs vary based on TOS, a separate shortest path



Moy                                                            [Page 20]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        tree is calculated for each TOS (see Section 2.1).  In addition,
        external costs can vary based on TOS.  For example, in Figure 2
        Router RT7 could advertise a separate type 1 external metric for
        each TOS.  Then, when calculating the TOS X distance to Network
        N15 the cost of the shortest TOS X path to RT7 would be added to
        the TOS X cost advertised by RT7 for Network N15 (see Section
        2.2).

        All OSPF implementations must be capable of calculating routes
        based on TOS.  However, OSPF routers can be configured to route
        all packets on the TOS 0 path (see Appendix C), eliminating the
        need to calculate non-zero TOS paths.  This can be used to
        conserve routing table space and processing resources in the
        router.  These TOS-0-only routers can be mixed with routers that
        do route based on TOS.  TOS-0-only routers will be avoided as
        much as possible when forwarding traffic requesting a non-zero
        TOS.

        It may be the case that no path exists for some non-zero TOS,
        even if the router is calculating non-zero TOS paths.  In that
        case, packets requesting that non-zero TOS are routed along the
        TOS 0 path (see Section 11.1).


3.  Splitting the AS into Areas

    OSPF allows collections of contiguous networks and hosts to be
    grouped together.  Such a group, together with the routers having
    interfaces to any one of the included networks, is called an area.
    Each area runs a separate copy of the basic link-state routing
    algorithm.  This means that each area has its own topological
    database and corresponding graph, as explained in the previous
    section.

    The topology of an area is invisible from the outside of the area.
    Conversely, routers internal to a given area know nothing of the
    detailed topology external to the area.  This isolation of knowledge
    enables the protocol to effect a marked reduction in routing traffic
    as compared to treating the entire Autonomous System as a single
    link-state domain.

    With the introduction of areas, it is no longer true that all
    routers in the AS have an identical topological database.  A router
    actually has a separate topological database for each area it is
    connected to.  (Routers connected to multiple areas are called area
    border routers).  Two routers belonging to the same area have, for
    that area, identical area topological databases.




Moy                                                            [Page 21]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    Routing in the Autonomous System takes place on two levels,
    depending on whether the source and destination of a packet reside
    in the same area (intra-area routing is used) or different areas
    (inter-area routing is used).  In intra-area routing, the packet is
    routed solely on information obtained within the area; no routing
    information obtained from outside the area can be used.  This
    protects intra-area routing from the injection of bad routing
    information.  We discuss inter-area routing in Section 3.2.


    3.1.  The backbone of the Autonomous System

        The backbone consists of those networks not contained in any
        area, their attached routers, and those routers that belong to
        multiple areas.  The backbone must be contiguous.

        It is possible to define areas in such a way that the backbone
        is no longer contiguous.  In this case the system administrator
        must restore backbone connectivity by configuring virtual links.

        Virtual links can be configured between any two backbone routers
        that have an interface to a common non-backbone area.  Virtual
        links belong to the backbone.  The protocol treats two routers
        joined by a virtual link as if they were connected by an
        unnumbered point-to-point network.  On the graph of the
        backbone, two such routers are joined by arcs whose costs are
        the intra-area distances between the two routers.  The routing
        protocol traffic that flows along the virtual link uses intra-
        area routing only.

        The backbone is responsible for distributing routing information
        between areas.  The backbone itself has all of the properties of
        an area.  The topology of the backbone is invisible to each of
        the areas, while the backbone itself knows nothing of the
        topology of the areas.


    3.2.  Inter-area routing

        When routing a packet between two areas the backbone is used.
        The path that the packet will travel can be broken up into three
        contiguous pieces: an intra-area path from the source to an area
        border router, a backbone path between the source and
        destination areas, and then another intra-area path to the
        destination.  The algorithm finds the set of such paths that
        have the smallest cost.

        Looking at this another way, inter-area routing can be pictured



Moy                                                            [Page 22]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        as forcing a star configuration on the Autonomous System, with
        the backbone as hub and each of the areas as spokes.

        The topology of the backbone dictates the backbone paths used
        between areas.  The topology of the backbone can be enhanced by
        adding virtual links.  This gives the system administrator some
        control over the routes taken by inter-area traffic.

        The correct area border router to use as the packet exits the
        source area is chosen in exactly the same way routers
        advertising external routes are chosen.  Each area border router
        in an area summarizes for the area its cost to all networks
        external to the area.  After the SPF tree is calculated for the
        area, routes to all other networks are calculated by examining
        the summaries of the area border routers.


    3.3.  Classification of routers

        Before the introduction of areas, the only OSPF routers having a
        specialized function were those advertising external routing
        information, such as Router RT5 in Figure 2.  When the AS is
        split into OSPF areas, the routers are further divided according
        to function into the following four overlapping categories:


        Internal routers
            A router with all directly connected networks belonging to
            the same area.  Routers with only backbone interfaces also
            belong to this category.  These routers run a single copy of
            the basic routing algorithm.

        Area border routers
            A router that attaches to multiple areas.  Area border
            routers run multiple copies of the basic algorithm, one copy
            for each attached area and an additional copy for the
            backbone.  Area border routers condense the topological
            information of their attached areas for distribution to the
            backbone.  The backbone in turn distributes the information
            to the other areas.

        Backbone routers
            A router that has an interface to the backbone.  This
            includes all routers that interface to more than one area
            (i.e., area border routers).  However, backbone routers do
            not have to be area border routers.  Routers with all
            interfaces connected to the backbone are considered to be
            internal routers.



Moy                                                            [Page 23]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        AS boundary routers
            A router that exchanges routing information with routers
            belonging to other Autonomous Systems.  Such a router has AS
            external routes that are advertised throughout the
            Autonomous System.  The path to each AS boundary router is
            known by every router in the AS.  This classification is
            completely independent of the previous classifications: AS
            boundary routers may be internal or area border routers, and
            may or may not participate in the backbone.


    3.4.  A sample area configuration

        Figure 6 shows a sample area configuration.  The first area
        consists of networks N1-N4, along with their attached routers
        RT1-RT4.  The second area consists of networks N6-N8, along with
        their attached routers RT7, RT8, RT10 and RT11.  The third area
        consists of networks N9-N11 and Host H1, along with their
        attached routers RT9, RT11 and RT12.  The third area has been
        configured so that networks N9-N11 and Host H1 will all be
        grouped into a single route, when advertised external to the
        area (see Section 3.5 for more details).

        In Figure 6, Routers RT1, RT2, RT5, RT6, RT8, RT9 and RT12 are
        internal routers.  Routers RT3, RT4, RT7, RT10 and RT11 are area
        border routers.  Finally, as before, Routers RT5 and RT7 are AS
        boundary routers.

        Figure 7 shows the resulting topological database for the Area
        1.  The figure completely describes that area's intra-area
        routing.  It also shows the complete view of the internet for
        the two internal routers RT1 and RT2.  It is the job of the area
        border routers, RT3 and RT4, to advertise into Area 1 the
        distances to all destinations external to the area.  These are
        indicated in Figure 7 by the dashed stub routes.  Also, RT3 and
        RT4 must advertise into Area 1 the location of the AS boundary
        routers RT5 and RT7.  Finally, external advertisements from RT5
        and RT7 are flooded throughout the entire AS, and in particular
        throughout Area 1.  These advertisements are included in Area
        1's database, and yield routes to Networks N12-N15.

        Routers RT3 and RT4 must also summarize Area 1's topology for
        distribution to the backbone.  Their backbone advertisements are
        shown in Table 4.  These summaries show which networks are
        contained in Area 1 (i.e., Networks N1-N4), and the distance to
        these networks from the routers RT3 and RT4 respectively.





Moy                                                            [Page 24]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994



             ...........................
             .   +                     .
             .   | 3+---+              .      N12      N14
             . N1|--|RT1|\ 1           .        \ N13 /
             .   |  +---+ \            .        8\ |8/8
             .   +         \ ____      .          \|/
             .              /    \   1+---+8    8+---+6
             .             *  N3  *---|RT4|------|RT5|--------+
             .              \____/    +---+      +---+        |
             .    +         /      \   .           |7         |
             .    | 3+---+ /        \  .           |          |
             .  N2|--|RT2|/1        1\ .           |6         |
             .    |  +---+            +---+8    6+---+        |
             .    +                   |RT3|------|RT6|        |
             .                        +---+      +---+        |
             .                      2/ .         Ia|7         |
             .                      /  .           |          |
             .             +---------+ .           |          |
             .Area 1           N4      .           |          |
             ...........................           |          |
          ..........................               |          |
          .            N11         .               |          |
          .        +---------+     .               |          |
          .             |          .               |          |    N12
          .             |3         .             Ib|5         |6 2/
          .           +---+        .             +----+     +---+/
          .           |RT9|        .    .........|RT10|.....|RT7|---N15.
          .           +---+        .    .        +----+     +---+ 9    .
          .             |1         .    .    +  /3    1\      |1       .
          .            _|__        .    .    | /        \   __|_       .
          .           /    \      1+----+2   |/          \ /    \      .
          .          *  N9  *------|RT11|----|            *  N6  *     .
          .           \____/       +----+    |             \____/      .
          .             |          .    .    |                |        .
          .             |1         .    .    +                |1       .
          .  +--+   10+----+       .    .   N8              +---+      .
          .  |H1|-----|RT12|       .    .                   |RT8|      .
          .  +--+SLIP +----+       .    .                   +---+      .
          .             |2         .    .                     |4       .
          .             |          .    .                     |        .
          .        +---------+     .    .                 +--------+   .
          .            N10         .    .                     N7       .
          .                        .    .Area 2                        .
          .Area 3                  .    ................................
          ..........................

                    Figure 6: A sample OSPF area configuration



Moy                                                            [Page 25]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


                     Network   RT3 adv.   RT4 adv.
                     _____________________________
                     N1        4          4
                     N2        4          4
                     N3        1          1
                     N4        2          3


              Table 4: Networks advertised to the backbone
                        by Routers RT3 and RT4.

        The topological database for the backbone is shown in Figure 8.
        The set of routers pictured are the backbone routers.  Router
        RT11 is a backbone router because it belongs to two areas.  In
        order to make the backbone connected, a virtual link has been
        configured between Routers R10 and R11.

        Again, Routers RT3, RT4, RT7, RT10 and RT11 are area border
        routers.  As Routers RT3 and RT4 did above, they have condensed
        the routing information of their attached areas for distribution
        via the backbone; these are the dashed stubs that appear in
        Figure 8.  Remember that the third area has been configured to
        condense Networks N9-N11 and Host H1 into a single route.  This
        yields a single dashed line for networks N9-N11 and Host H1 in
        Figure 8.  Routers RT5 and RT7 are AS boundary routers; their
        externally derived information also appears on the graph in
        Figure 8 as stubs.

        The backbone enables the exchange of summary information between
        area border routers.  Every area border router hears the area
        summaries from all other area border routers.  It then forms a
        picture of the distance to all networks outside of its area by
        examining the collected advertisements, and adding in the
        backbone distance to each advertising router.

        Again using Routers RT3 and RT4 as an example, the procedure
        goes as follows: They first calculate the SPF tree for the
        backbone.  This gives the distances to all other area border
        routers.  Also noted are the distances to networks (Ia and Ib)
        and AS boundary routers (RT5 and RT7) that belong to the
        backbone.  This calculation is shown in Table 5.


        Next, by looking at the area summaries from these area border
        routers, RT3 and RT4 can determine the distance to all networks
        outside their area.  These distances are then advertised
        internally to the area by RT3 and RT4.  The advertisements that
        Router RT3 and RT4 will make into Area 1 are shown in Table 6.



Moy                                                            [Page 26]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994



                               **FROM**

                          |RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|
                          |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |7 |N3|
                       ----- -------------------
                       RT1|  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |
                       RT2|  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |
                       RT3|  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |
                   *   RT4|  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |
                   *   RT5|  |  |14|8 |  |  |  |
                   T   RT7|  |  |20|14|  |  |  |
                   O    N1|3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
                   *    N2|  |3 |  |  |  |  |  |
                   *    N3|1 |1 |1 |1 |  |  |  |
                        N4|  |  |2 |  |  |  |  |
                     Ia,Ib|  |  |15|22|  |  |  |
                        N6|  |  |16|15|  |  |  |
                        N7|  |  |20|19|  |  |  |
                        N8|  |  |18|18|  |  |  |
                 N9-N11,H1|  |  |19|16|  |  |  |
                       N12|  |  |  |  |8 |2 |  |
                       N13|  |  |  |  |8 |  |  |
                       N14|  |  |  |  |8 |  |  |
                       N15|  |  |  |  |  |9 |  |

                      Figure 7: Area 1's Database.

              Networks and routers are represented by vertices.
              An edge of cost X connects Vertex A to Vertex B iff
              the intersection of Column A and Row B is marked
                               with an X.



















Moy                                                            [Page 27]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


                                  **FROM**

                            |RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT
                            |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |10|11|
                         ------------------------
                         RT3|  |  |  |6 |  |  |  |
                         RT4|  |  |8 |  |  |  |  |
                         RT5|  |8 |  |6 |6 |  |  |
                         RT6|8 |  |7 |  |  |5 |  |
                         RT7|  |  |6 |  |  |  |  |
                     *  RT10|  |  |  |7 |  |  |2 |
                     *  RT11|  |  |  |  |  |3 |  |
                     T    N1|4 |4 |  |  |  |  |  |
                     O    N2|4 |4 |  |  |  |  |  |
                     *    N3|1 |1 |  |  |  |  |  |
                     *    N4|2 |3 |  |  |  |  |  |
                          Ia|  |  |  |  |  |5 |  |
                          Ib|  |  |  |7 |  |  |  |
                          N6|  |  |  |  |1 |1 |3 |
                          N7|  |  |  |  |5 |5 |7 |
                          N8|  |  |  |  |4 |3 |2 |
                   N9-N11,H1|  |  |  |  |  |  |1 |
                         N12|  |  |8 |  |2 |  |  |
                         N13|  |  |8 |  |  |  |  |
                         N14|  |  |8 |  |  |  |  |
                         N15|  |  |  |  |9 |  |  |


                     Figure 8: The backbone's database.

              Networks and routers are represented by vertices.
              An edge of cost X connects Vertex A to Vertex B iff
              the intersection of Column A and Row B is marked
                                 with an X.

















Moy                                                            [Page 28]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


                 Area  border   dist  from   dist  from
                 router         RT3          RT4
                 ______________________________________
                 to  RT3        *            21
                 to  RT4        22           *
                 to  RT7        20           14
                 to  RT10       15           22
                 to  RT11       18           25
                 ______________________________________
                 to  Ia         20           27
                 to  Ib         15           22
                 ______________________________________
                 to  RT5        14           8
                 to  RT7        20           14


                 Table 5: Backbone distances calculated
                        by Routers RT3 and RT4.

        Note that Table 6 assumes that an area range has been configured
        for the backbone which groups Ia and Ib into a single
        advertisement.


        The information imported into Area 1 by Routers RT3 and RT4
        enables an internal router, such as RT1, to choose an area
        border router intelligently.  Router RT1 would use RT4 for
        traffic to Network N6, RT3 for traffic to Network N10, and would
        load share between the two for traffic to Network N8.



                   Destination   RT3 adv.   RT4 adv.
                   _________________________________
                   Ia,Ib         15         22
                   N6            16         15
                   N7            20         19
                   N8            18         18
                   N9-N11,H1     19         26
                   _________________________________
                   RT5           14         8
                   RT7           20         14


              Table 6: Destinations advertised into Area 1
                        by Routers RT3 and RT4.





Moy                                                            [Page 29]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        Router RT1 can also determine in this manner the shortest path
        to the AS boundary routers RT5 and RT7.  Then, by looking at RT5
        and RT7's external advertisements, Router RT1 can decide between
        RT5 or RT7 when sending to a destination in another Autonomous
        System (one of the networks N12-N15).

        Note that a failure of the line between Routers RT6 and RT10
        will cause the backbone to become disconnected.  Configuring a
        virtual link between Routers RT7 and RT10 will give the backbone
        more connectivity and more resistance to such failures. Also, a
        virtual link between RT7 and RT10 would allow a much shorter
        path between the third area (containing N9) and the router RT7,
        which is advertising a good route to external network N12.


    3.5.  IP subnetting support

        OSPF attaches an IP address mask to each advertised route.  The
        mask indicates the range of addresses being described by the
        particular route.  For example, a summary advertisement for the
        destination 128.185.0.0 with a mask of 0xffff0000 actually is
        describing a single route to the collection of destinations
        128.185.0.0 - 128.185.255.255.  Similarly, host routes are
        always advertised with a mask of 0xffffffff, indicating the
        presence of only a single destination.

        Including the mask with each advertised destination enables the
        implementation of what is commonly referred to as variable-
        length subnetting.  This means that a single IP class A, B, or C
        network number can be broken up into many subnets of various
        sizes.  For example, the network 128.185.0.0 could be broken up
        into 62 variable-sized subnets: 15 subnets of size 4K, 15
        subnets of size 256, and 32 subnets of size 8.  Table 7 shows
        some of the resulting network addresses together with their
        masks:



                  Network address   IP address mask   Subnet size
                  _______________________________________________
                  128.185.16.0      0xfffff000        4K
                  128.185.1.0       0xffffff00        256
                  128.185.0.8       0xfffffff8        8


                         Table 7: Some sample subnet sizes.





Moy                                                            [Page 30]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        There are many possible ways of dividing up a class A, B, and C
        network into variable sized subnets.  The precise procedure for
        doing so is beyond the scope of this specification.  This
        specification however establishes the following guideline: When
        an IP packet is forwarded, it is always forwarded to the network
        that is the best match for the packet's destination.  Here best
        match is synonymous with the longest or most specific match.
        For example, the default route with destination of 0.0.0.0 and
        mask 0x00000000 is always a match for every IP destination.  Yet
        it is always less specific than any other match.  Subnet masks
        must be assigned so that the best match for any IP destination
        is unambiguous.

        The OSPF area concept is modelled after an IP subnetted network.
        OSPF areas have been loosely defined to be a collection of
        networks.  In actuality, an OSPF area is specified to be a list
        of address ranges (see Section C.2 for more details).  Each
        address range is defined as an [address,mask] pair.  Many
        separate networks may then be contained in a single address
        range, just as a subnetted network is composed of many separate
        subnets.  Area border routers then summarize the area contents
        (for distribution to the backbone) by advertising a single route
        for each address range.  The cost of the route is the minimum
        cost to any of the networks falling in the specified range.

        For example, an IP subnetted network can be configured as a
        single OSPF area.  In that case, the area would be defined as a
        single address range: a class A, B, or C network number along
        with its natural IP mask.  Inside the area, any number of
        variable sized subnets could be defined.  External to the area,
        a single route for the entire subnetted network would be
        distributed, hiding even the fact that the network is subnetted
        at all.  The cost of this route is the minimum of the set of
        costs to the component subnets.


    3.6.  Supporting stub areas

        In some Autonomous Systems, the majority of the topological
        database may consist of AS external advertisements.  An OSPF AS
        external advertisement is usually flooded throughout the entire
        AS.  However, OSPF allows certain areas to be configured as
        "stub areas".  AS external advertisements are not flooded
        into/throughout stub areas; routing to AS external destinations
        in these areas is based on a (per-area) default only.  This
        reduces the topological database size, and therefore the memory
        requirements, for a stub area's internal routers.




Moy                                                            [Page 31]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        In order to take advantage of the OSPF stub area support,
        default routing must be used in the stub area.  This is
        accomplished as follows.  One or more of the stub area's area
        border routers must advertise a default route into the stub area
        via summary link advertisements.  These summary defaults are
        flooded throughout the stub area, but no further.  (For this
        reason these defaults pertain only to the particular stub area).
        These summary default routes will match any destination that is
        not explicitly reachable by an intra-area or inter-area path
        (i.e., AS external destinations).

        An area can be configured as stub when there is a single exit
        point from the area, or when the choice of exit point need not
        be made on a per-external-destination basis.  For example, Area
        3 in Figure 6 could be configured as a stub area, because all
        external traffic must travel though its single area border
        router RT11.  If Area 3 were configured as a stub, Router RT11
        would advertise a default route for distribution inside Area 3
        (in a summary link advertisement), instead of flooding the AS
        external advertisements for Networks N12-N15 into/throughout the
        area.

        The OSPF protocol ensures that all routers belonging to an area
        agree on whether the area has been configured as a stub.  This
        guarantees that no confusion will arise in the flooding of AS
        external advertisements.

        There are a couple of restrictions on the use of stub areas.
        Virtual links cannot be configured through stub areas.  In
        addition, AS boundary routers cannot be placed internal to stub
        areas.


    3.7.  Partitions of areas

        OSPF does not actively attempt to repair area partitions.  When
        an area becomes partitioned, each component simply becomes a
        separate area.  The backbone then performs routing between the
        new areas.  Some destinations reachable via intra-area routing
        before the partition will now require inter-area routing.

        In the previous section, an area was described as a list of
        address ranges.  Any particular address range must still be
        completely contained in a single component of the area
        partition.  This has to do with the way the area contents are
        summarized to the backbone.  Also, the backbone itself must not
        partition.  If it does, parts of the Autonomous System will
        become unreachable.  Backbone partitions can be repaired by



Moy                                                            [Page 32]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        configuring virtual links (see Section 15).

        Another way to think about area partitions is to look at the
        Autonomous System graph that was introduced in Section 2.  Area
        IDs can be viewed as colors for the graph's edges.[1] Each edge
        of the graph connects to a network, or is itself a point-to-
        point network.  In either case, the edge is colored with the
        network's Area ID.

        A group of edges, all having the same color, and interconnected
        by vertices, represents an area.  If the topology of the
        Autonomous System is intact, the graph will have several regions
        of color, each color being a distinct Area ID.

        When the AS topology changes, one of the areas may become
        partitioned.  The graph of the AS will then have multiple
        regions of the same color (Area ID).  The routing in the
        Autonomous System will continue to function as long as these
        regions of same color are connected by the single backbone
        region.































Moy                                                            [Page 33]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


4.  Functional Summary

    A separate copy of OSPF's basic routing algorithm runs in each area.
    Routers having interfaces to multiple areas run multiple copies of
    the algorithm.  A brief summary of the routing algorithm follows.

    When a router starts, it first initializes the routing protocol data
    structures.  The router then waits for indications from the lower-
    level protocols that its interfaces are functional.

    A router then uses the OSPF's Hello Protocol to acquire neighbors.
    The router sends Hello packets to its neighbors, and in turn
    receives their Hello packets.  On broadcast and point-to-point
    networks, the router dynamically detects its neighboring routers by
    sending its Hello packets to the multicast address AllSPFRouters.
    On non-broadcast networks, some configuration information is
    necessary in order to discover neighbors.  On all multi-access
    networks (broadcast or non-broadcast), the Hello Protocol also
    elects a Designated router for the network.

    The router will attempt to form adjacencies with some of its newly
    acquired neighbors.  Topological databases are synchronized between
    pairs of adjacent routers.  On multi-access networks, the Designated
    Router determines which routers should become adjacent.

    Adjacencies control the distribution of routing protocol packets.
    Routing protocol packets are sent and received only on adjacencies.
    In particular, distribution of topological database updates proceeds
    along adjacencies.

    A router periodically advertises its state, which is also called
    link state.  Link state is also advertised when a router's state
    changes.  A router's adjacencies are reflected in the contents of
    its link state advertisements.  This relationship between
    adjacencies and link state allows the protocol to detect dead
    routers in a timely fashion.

    Link state advertisements are flooded throughout the area.  The
    flooding algorithm is reliable, ensuring that all routers in an area
    have exactly the same topological database.  This database consists
    of the collection of link state advertisements received from each
    router belonging to the area.  From this database each router
    calculates a shortest-path tree, with itself as root.  This
    shortest-path tree in turn yields a routing table for the protocol.







Moy                                                            [Page 34]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    4.1.  Inter-area routing

        The previous section described the operation of the protocol
        within a single area.  For intra-area routing, no other routing
        information is pertinent.  In order to be able to route to
        destinations outside of the area, the area border routers inject
        additional routing information into the area.  This additional
        information is a distillation of the rest of the Autonomous
        System's topology.

        This distillation is accomplished as follows: Each area border
        router is by definition connected to the backbone.  Each area
        border router summarizes the topology of its attached areas for
        transmission on the backbone, and hence to all other area border
        routers.  An area border router then has complete topological
        information concerning the backbone, and the area summaries from
        each of the other area border routers.  From this information,
        the router calculates paths to all destinations not contained in
        its attached areas.  The router then advertises these paths into
        its attached areas.  This enables the area's internal routers to
        pick the best exit router when forwarding traffic to
        destinations in other areas.


    4.2.  AS external routes

        Routers that have information regarding other Autonomous Systems
        can flood this information throughout the AS.  This external
        routing information is distributed verbatim to every
        participating router.  There is one exception: external routing
        information is not flooded into "stub" areas (see Section 3.6).

        To utilize external routing information, the path to all routers
        advertising external information must be known throughout the AS
        (excepting the stub areas).  For that reason, the locations of
        these AS boundary routers are summarized by the (non-stub) area
        border routers.


    4.3.  Routing protocol packets

        The OSPF protocol runs directly over IP, using IP protocol 89.
        OSPF does not provide any explicit fragmentation/reassembly
        support.  When fragmentation is necessary, IP
        fragmentation/reassembly is used.  OSPF protocol packets have
        been designed so that large protocol packets can generally be
        split into several smaller protocol packets.  This practice is
        recommended; IP fragmentation should be avoided whenever



Moy                                                            [Page 35]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        possible.

        Routing protocol packets should always be sent with the IP TOS
        field set to 0.  If at all possible, routing protocol packets
        should be given preference over regular IP data traffic, both
        when being sent and received.  As an aid to accomplishing this,
        OSPF protocol packets should have their IP precedence field set
        to the value Internetwork Control (see [RFC 791]).

        All OSPF protocol packets share a common protocol header that is
        described in Appendix A.  The OSPF packet types are listed below
        in Table 8.  Their formats are also described in Appendix A.



             Type   Packet  name           Protocol  function
             __________________________________________________________
             1      Hello                  Discover/maintain  neighbors
             2      Database Description   Summarize database contents
             3      Link State Request     Database download
             4      Link State Update      Database update
             5      Link State Ack         Flooding acknowledgment


                            Table 8: OSPF packet types.


        OSPF's Hello protocol uses Hello packets to discover and
        maintain neighbor relationships.  The Database Description and
        Link State Request packets are used in the forming of
        adjacencies.  OSPF's reliable update mechanism is implemented by
        the Link State Update and Link State Acknowledgment packets.

        Each Link State Update packet carries a set of new link state
        advertisements one hop further away from their point of
        origination.  A single Link State Update packet may contain the
        link state advertisements of several routers.  Each
        advertisement is tagged with the ID of the originating router
        and a checksum of its link state contents.  The five different
        types of OSPF link state advertisements are listed below in
        Table 9.

        As mentioned above, OSPF routing packets (with the exception of
        Hellos) are sent only over adjacencies.  Note that this means
        that all OSPF protocol packets travel a single IP hop, except
        those that are sent over virtual adjacencies.  The IP source
        address of an OSPF protocol packet is one end of a router
        adjacency, and the IP destination address is either the other



Moy                                                            [Page 36]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994




       LS     Advertisement      Advertisement description
       type   name
       _________________________________________________________
       1      Router links       Originated by all routers.
              advertisements     This advertisement describes
                                 the collected states of the
                                 router's interfaces to an
                                 area. Flooded throughout a
                                 single area only.
       _________________________________________________________
       2      Network links      Originated for multi-access
              advertisements     networks by the Designated
                                 Router. This advertisement
                                 contains the list of routers
                                 connected to the network.
                                 Flooded throughout a single
                                 area only.
       _________________________________________________________
       3,4    Summary link       Originated by area border
              advertisements     routers, and flooded through-
                                 out the advertisement's
                                 associated area. Each summary
                                 link advertisement describes
                                 a route to a destination out-
                                 side the area, yet still inside
                                 the AS (i.e., an inter-area
                                 route). Type 3 advertisements
                                 describe routes to networks.
                                 Type 4 advertisements describe
                                 routes to AS boundary routers.
       _________________________________________________________
       5      AS external link   Originated by AS boundary
              advertisements     routers, and flooded through-
                                 out the AS. Each AS external
                                 link advertisement describes
                                 a route to a destination in
                                 another Autonomous System.
                                 Default routes for the AS can
                                 also be described by AS
                                 external link advertisements.


                Table 9: OSPF link state advertisements.






Moy                                                            [Page 37]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        end of the adjacency or an IP multicast address.


    4.4.  Basic implementation requirements

        An implementation of OSPF requires the following pieces of
        system support:


        Timers
            Two different kind of timers are required.  The first kind,
            called single shot timers, fire once and cause a protocol
            event to be processed.  The second kind, called interval
            timers, fire at continuous intervals.  These are used for
            the sending of packets at regular intervals.  A good example
            of this is the regular broadcast of Hello packets (on
            broadcast networks).  The granularity of both kinds of
            timers is one second.

            Interval timers should be implemented to avoid drift.  In
            some router implementations, packet processing can affect
            timer execution.  When multiple routers are attached to a
            single network, all doing broadcasts, this can lead to the
            synchronization of routing packets (which should be
            avoided).  If timers cannot be implemented to avoid drift,
            small random amounts should be added to/subtracted from the
            timer interval at each firing.

        IP multicast
            Certain OSPF packets take the form of IP multicast
            datagrams.  Support for receiving and sending IP multicast
            datagrams, along with the appropriate lower-level protocol
            support, is required.  The IP multicast datagrams used by
            OSPF never travel more than one hop. For this reason, the
            ability to forward IP multicast datagrams is not required.
            For information on IP multicast, see [RFC 1112].

        Variable-length subnet support
            The router's IP protocol support must include the ability to
            divide a single IP class A, B, or C network number into many
            subnets of various sizes.  This is commonly called
            variable-length subnetting; see Section 3.5 for details.

        IP supernetting support
            The router's IP protocol support must include the ability to
            aggregate contiguous collections of IP class A, B, and C
            networks into larger quantities called supernets.
            Supernetting has been proposed as one way to improve the



Moy                                                            [Page 38]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            scaling of IP routing in the worldwide Internet. For more
            information on IP supernetting, see [RFC 1519].

        Lower-level protocol support
            The lower level protocols referred to here are the network
            access protocols, such as the Ethernet data link layer.
            Indications must be passed from these protocols to OSPF as
            the network interface goes up and down.  For example, on an
            ethernet it would be valuable to know when the ethernet
            transceiver cable becomes unplugged.

        Non-broadcast lower-level protocol support
            Remember that non-broadcast networks are multi-access
            networks such as a X.25 PDN.  On these networks, the Hello
            Protocol can be aided by providing an indication to OSPF
            when an attempt is made to send a packet to a dead or non-
            existent router.  For example, on an X.25 PDN a dead
            neighboring router may be indicated by the reception of a
            X.25 clear with an appropriate cause and diagnostic, and
            this information would be passed to OSPF.

        List manipulation primitives
            Much of the OSPF functionality is described in terms of its
            operation on lists of link state advertisements.  For
            example, the collection of advertisements that will be
            retransmitted to an adjacent router until acknowledged are
            described as a list.  Any particular advertisement may be on
            many such lists.  An OSPF implementation needs to be able to
            manipulate these lists, adding and deleting constituent
            advertisements as necessary.

        Tasking support
            Certain procedures described in this specification invoke
            other procedures.  At times, these other procedures should
            be executed in-line, that is, before the current procedure
            is finished.  This is indicated in the text by instructions
            to execute a procedure.  At other times, the other
            procedures are to be executed only when the current
            procedure has finished.  This is indicated by instructions
            to schedule a task.


    4.5.  Optional OSPF capabilities

        The OSPF protocol defines several optional capabilities.  A
        router indicates the optional capabilities that it supports in
        its OSPF Hello packets, Database Description packets and in its
        link state advertisements.  This enables routers supporting a



Moy                                                            [Page 39]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        mix of optional capabilities to coexist in a single Autonomous
        System.

        Some capabilities must be supported by all routers attached to a
        specific area.  In this case, a router will not accept a
        neighbor's Hello Packet unless there is a match in reported
        capabilities (i.e., a capability mismatch prevents a neighbor
        relationship from forming).  An example of this is the
        ExternalRoutingCapability (see below).

        Other capabilities can be negotiated during the Database
        Exchange process.  This is accomplished by specifying the
        optional capabilities in Database Description packets.  A
        capability mismatch with a neighbor in this case will result in
        only a subset of link state advertisements being exchanged
        between the two neighbors.

        The routing table build process can also be affected by the
        presence/absence of optional capabilities.  For example, since
        the optional capabilities are reported in link state
        advertisements, routers incapable of certain functions can be
        avoided when building the shortest path tree.  An example of
        this is the TOS routing capability (see below).

        The current OSPF optional capabilities are listed below.  See
        Section A.2 for more information.


        ExternalRoutingCapability
            Entire OSPF areas can be configured as "stubs" (see Section
            3.6).  AS external advertisements will not be flooded into
            stub areas.  This capability is represented by the E-bit in
            the OSPF options field (see Section A.2).  In order to
            ensure consistent configuration of stub areas, all routers
            interfacing to such an area must have the E-bit clear in
            their Hello packets (see Sections 9.5 and 10.5).

        TOS capability
            All OSPF implementations must be able to calculate separate
            routes based on IP Type of Service.  However, to save
            routing table space and processing resources, an OSPF router
            can be configured to ignore TOS when forwarding packets.  In
            this case, the router calculates routes for TOS 0 only.
            This capability is represented by the T-bit in the OSPF
            options field (see Section A.2).  TOS-capable routers will
            attempt to avoid non-TOS-capable routers when calculating
            non-zero TOS paths.




Moy                                                            [Page 40]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


5.  Protocol Data Structures

    The OSPF protocol is described in this specification in terms of its
    operation on various protocol data structures.  The following list
    comprises the top-level OSPF data structures.  Any initialization
    that needs to be done is noted.  OSPF areas, interfaces and
    neighbors also have associated data structures that are described
    later in this specification.


    Router ID
        A 32-bit number that uniquely identifies this router in the AS.
        One possible implementation strategy would be to use the
        smallest IP interface address belonging to the router. If a
        router's OSPF Router ID is changed, the router's OSPF software
        should be restarted before the new Router ID takes effect.
        Before restarting in order to change its Router ID, the router
        should flush its self-originated link state advertisements from
        the routing domain (see Section 14.1), or they will persist for
        up to MaxAge minutes.

    Area structures
        Each one of the areas to which the router is connected has its
        own data structure.  This data structure describes the working
        of the basic algorithm.  Remember that each area runs a separate
        copy of the basic algorithm.

    Backbone (area) structure
        The basic algorithm operates on the backbone as if it were an
        area.  For this reason the backbone is represented as an area
        structure.

    Virtual links configured
        The virtual links configured with this router as one endpoint.
        In order to have configured virtual links, the router itself
        must be an area border router.  Virtual links are identified by
        the Router ID of the other endpoint -- which is another area
        border router.  These two endpoint routers must be attached to a
        common area, called the virtual link's Transit area.  Virtual
        links are part of the backbone, and behave as if they were
        unnumbered point-to-point networks between the two routers.  A
        virtual link uses the intra-area routing of its Transit area to
        forward packets.  Virtual links are brought up and down through
        the building of the shortest-path trees for the Transit area.

    List of external routes
        These are routes to destinations external to the Autonomous
        System, that have been gained either through direct experience



Moy                                                            [Page 41]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        with another routing protocol (such as EGP), or through
        configuration information, or through a combination of the two
        (e.g., dynamic external information to be advertised by OSPF
        with configured metric). Any router having these external routes
        is called an AS boundary router.  These routes are advertised by
        the router into the OSPF routing domain via AS external link
        advertisements.

    List of AS external link advertisements
        Part of the topological database.  These have originated from
        the AS boundary routers.  They comprise routes to destinations
        external to the Autonomous System.  Note that, if the router is
        itself an AS boundary router, some of these AS external link
        advertisements have been self-originated.

    The routing table
        Derived from the topological database.  Each destination that
        the router can forward to is represented by a cost and a set of
        paths.  A path is described by its type and next hop.  For more
        information, see Section 11.

    TOS capability
        This item indicates whether the router will calculate separate
        routes based on TOS.  This is a configurable parameter.  For
        more information, see Sections 4.5 and 16.9.


    Figure 9 shows the collection of data structures present in a
    typical router.  The router pictured is RT10, from the map in Figure
    6.  Note that Router RT10 has a virtual link configured to Router
    RT11, with Area 2 as the link's Transit area.  This is indicated by
    the dashed line in Figure 9.  When the virtual link becomes active,
    through the building of the shortest path tree for Area 2, it
    becomes an interface to the backbone (see the two backbone
    interfaces depicted in Figure 9).

6.  The Area Data Structure

    The area data structure contains all the information used to run the
    basic routing algorithm. Each area maintains its own topological
    database. A network belongs to a single area, and a router interface
    connects to a single area. Each router adjacency also belongs to a
    single area.

    The OSPF backbone has all the properties of an area.  For that
    reason it is also represented by an area data structure.  Note that
    some items in the structure apply differently to the backbone than
    to non-backbone areas.



Moy                                                            [Page 42]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994





                              +----+
                              |RT10|------+
                              +----+       \+-------------+
                             /      \       |Routing Table|
                            /        \      +-------------+
                           /          \
              +------+    /            \    +--------+
              |Area 2|---+              +---|Backbone|
              +------+***********+          +--------+
             /        \           *        /          \
            /          \           *      /            \
       +---------+  +---------+    +------------+       +------------+
       |Interface|  |Interface|    |Virtual Link|       |Interface Ib|
       |  to N6  |  |  to N8  |    |   to RT11  |       +------------+
       +---------+  +---------+    +------------+             |
           /  \           |               |                   |
          /    \          |               |                   |
   +--------+ +--------+  |        +-------------+      +------------+
   |Neighbor| |Neighbor|  |        |Neighbor RT11|      |Neighbor RT6|
   |  RT8   | |  RT7   |  |        +-------------+      +------------+
   +--------+ +--------+  |
                          |
                     +-------------+
                     |Neighbor RT11|
                     +-------------+


                Figure 9: Router RT10's Data structures

    The area topological (or link state) database consists of the
    collection of router links, network links and summary link
    advertisements that have originated from the area's routers.  This
    information is flooded throughout a single area only.  The list of
    AS external link advertisements (see Section 5) is also considered
    to be part of each area's topological database.


    Area ID
        A 32-bit number identifying the area.  0.0.0.0 is reserved for
        the Area ID of the backbone.  If assigning subnetted networks as
        separate areas, the IP network number could be used as the Area
        ID.

    List of component address ranges
        The address ranges that define the area.  Each address range is



Moy                                                            [Page 43]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        specified by an [address,mask] pair and a status indication of
        either Advertise or DoNotAdvertise (see Section 12.4.3). Each
        network is then assigned to an area depending on the address
        range that it falls into (specified address ranges are not
        allowed to overlap).  As an example, if an IP subnetted network
        is to be its own separate OSPF area, the area is defined to
        consist of a single address range - an IP network number with
        its natural (class A, B or C) mask.

    Associated router interfaces
        This router's interfaces connecting to the area.  A router
        interface belongs to one and only one area (or the backbone).
        For the backbone structure this list includes all the virtual
        links.  A virtual link is identified by the Router ID of its
        other endpoint; its cost is the cost of the shortest intra-area
        path through the Transit area that exists between the two
        routers.

    List of router links advertisements
        A router links advertisement is generated by each router in the
        area.  It describes the state of the router's interfaces to the
        area.

    List of network links advertisements
        One network links advertisement is generated for each transit
        multi-access network in the area.  A network links advertisement
        describes the set of routers currently connected to the network.

    List of summary link advertisements
        Summary link advertisements originate from the area's area
        border routers.  They describe routes to destinations internal
        to the Autonomous System, yet external to the area.

    Shortest-path tree
        The shortest-path tree for the area, with this router itself as
        root.  Derived from the collected router links and network links
        advertisements by the Dijkstra algorithm (see Section 16.1).

    AuType
        The type of authentication used for this area.  Authentication
        types are defined in Appendix D.  All OSPF packet exchanges are
        authenticated.  Different authentication schemes may be used in
        different areas.

    TransitCapability
        Set to TRUE if and only if there are one or more active virtual
        links using the area as a Transit area. Equivalently, this
        parameter indicates whether the area can carry data traffic that



Moy                                                            [Page 44]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        neither originates nor terminates in the area itself. This
        parameter is calculated when the area's shortest-path tree is
        built (see Section 16.1, and is used as an input to a subsequent
        step of the routing table build process (see Section 16.3).

    ExternalRoutingCapability
        Whether AS external advertisements will be flooded
        into/throughout the area.  This is a configurable parameter.  If
        AS external advertisements are excluded from the area, the area
        is called a "stub".  Internal to stub areas, routing to AS
        external destinations will be based solely on a default summary
        route.  The backbone cannot be configured as a stub area.  Also,
        virtual links cannot be configured through stub areas.  For more
        information, see Section 3.6.

    StubDefaultCost
        If the area has been configured as a stub area, and the router
        itself is an area border router, then the StubDefaultCost
        indicates the cost of the default summary link that the router
        should advertise into the area.  There can be a separate cost
        configured for each IP TOS.  See Section 12.4.3 for more
        information.


    Unless otherwise specified, the remaining sections of this document
    refer to the operation of the protocol in a single area.


7.  Bringing Up Adjacencies

    OSPF creates adjacencies between neighboring routers for the purpose
    of exchanging routing information.  Not every two neighboring
    routers will become adjacent.  This section covers the generalities
    involved in creating adjacencies.  For further details consult
    Section 10.


    7.1.  The Hello Protocol

        The Hello Protocol is responsible for establishing and
        maintaining neighbor relationships.  It also ensures that
        communication between neighbors is bidirectional.  Hello packets
        are sent periodically out all router interfaces.  Bidirectional
        communication is indicated when the router sees itself listed in
        the neighbor's Hello Packet.

        On multi-access networks, the Hello Protocol elects a Designated
        Router for the network.  Among other things, the Designated



Moy                                                            [Page 45]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        Router controls what adjacencies will be formed over the network
        (see below).

        The Hello Protocol works differently on broadcast networks, as
        compared to non-broadcast networks.  On broadcast networks, each
        router advertises itself by periodically multicasting Hello
        Packets.  This allows neighbors to be discovered dynamically.
        These Hello Packets contain the router's view of the Designated
        Router's identity, and the list of routers whose Hello Packets
        have been seen recently.

        On non-broadcast networks some configuration information is
        necessary for the operation of the Hello Protocol.  Each router
        that may potentially become Designated Router has a list of all
        other routers attached to the network.  A router, having
        Designated Router potential, sends Hello Packets to all other
        potential Designated Routers when its interface to the non-
        broadcast network first becomes operational.  This is an attempt
        to find the Designated Router for the network.  If the router
        itself is elected Designated Router, it begins sending Hello
        Packets to all other routers attached to the network.

        After a neighbor has been discovered, bidirectional
        communication ensured, and (if on a multi-access network) a
        Designated Router elected, a decision is made regarding whether
        or not an adjacency should be formed with the neighbor (see
        Section 10.4).  An attempt is always made to establish
        adjacencies over point-to-point networks and virtual links.  The
        first step in bringing up an adjacency is to synchronize the
        neighbors' topological databases.  This is covered in the next
        section.


    7.2.  The Synchronization of Databases

        In a link-state routing algorithm, it is very important for all
        routers' topological databases to stay synchronized.  OSPF
        simplifies this by requiring only adjacent routers to remain
        synchronized.  The synchronization process begins as soon as the
        routers attempt to bring up the adjacency.  Each router
        describes its database by sending a sequence of Database
        Description packets to its neighbor.  Each Database Description
        Packet describes a set of link state advertisements belonging to
        the router's database.  When the neighbor sees a link state
        advertisement that is more recent than its own database copy, it
        makes a note that this newer advertisement should be requested.

        This sending and receiving of Database Description packets is



Moy                                                            [Page 46]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        called the "Database Exchange Process".  During this process,
        the two routers form a master/slave relationship.  Each Database
        Description Packet has a sequence number.  Database Description
        Packets sent by the master (polls) are acknowledged by the slave
        through echoing of the sequence number.  Both polls and their
        responses contain summaries of link state data.  The master is
        the only one allowed to retransmit Database Description Packets.
        It does so only at fixed intervals, the length of which is the
        configured constant RxmtInterval.

        Each Database Description contains an indication that there are
        more packets to follow --- the M-bit.  The Database Exchange
        Process is over when a router has received and sent Database
        Description Packets with the M-bit off.

        During and after the Database Exchange Process, each router has
        a list of those link state advertisements for which the neighbor
        has more up-to-date instances.  These advertisements are
        requested in Link State Request Packets.  Link State Request
        packets that are not satisfied are retransmitted at fixed
        intervals of time RxmtInterval.  When the Database Description
        Process has completed and all Link State Requests have been
        satisfied, the databases are deemed synchronized and the routers
        are marked fully adjacent.  At this time the adjacency is fully
        functional and is advertised in the two routers' link state
        advertisements.

        The adjacency is used by the flooding procedure as soon as the
        Database Exchange Process begins.  This simplifies database
        synchronization, and guarantees that it finishes in a
        predictable period of time.


    7.3.  The Designated Router

        Every multi-access network has a Designated Router.  The
        Designated Router performs two main functions for the routing
        protocol:

        o   The Designated Router originates a network links
            advertisement on behalf of the network.  This advertisement
            lists the set of routers (including the Designated Router
            itself) currently attached to the network.  The Link State
            ID for this advertisement (see Section 12.1.4) is the IP
            interface address of the Designated Router.  The IP network
            number can then be obtained by using the subnet/network
            mask.




Moy                                                            [Page 47]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        o   The Designated Router becomes adjacent to all other routers
            on the network.  Since the link state databases are
            synchronized across adjacencies (through adjacency bring-up
            and then the flooding procedure), the Designated Router
            plays a central part in the synchronization process.


        The Designated Router is elected by the Hello Protocol.  A
        router's Hello Packet contains its Router Priority, which is
        configurable on a per-interface basis.  In general, when a
        router's interface to a network first becomes functional, it
        checks to see whether there is currently a Designated Router for
        the network.  If there is, it accepts that Designated Router,
        regardless of its Router Priority.  (This makes it harder to
        predict the identity of the Designated Router, but ensures that
        the Designated Router changes less often.  See below.)
        Otherwise, the router itself becomes Designated Router if it has
        the highest Router Priority on the network.  A more detailed
        (and more accurate) description of Designated Router election is
        presented in Section 9.4.

        The Designated Router is the endpoint of many adjacencies.  In
        order to optimize the flooding procedure on broadcast networks,
        the Designated Router multicasts its Link State Update Packets
        to the address AllSPFRouters, rather than sending separate
        packets over each adjacency.

        Section 2 of this document discusses the directed graph
        representation of an area.  Router nodes are labelled with their
        Router ID.  Multi-access network nodes are actually labelled
        with the IP address of their Designated Router.  It follows that
        when the Designated Router changes, it appears as if the network
        node on the graph is replaced by an entirely new node.  This
        will cause the network and all its attached routers to originate
        new link state advertisements.  Until the topological databases
        again converge, some temporary loss of connectivity may result.
        This may result in ICMP unreachable messages being sent in
        response to data traffic.  For that reason, the Designated
        Router should change only infrequently.  Router Priorities
        should be configured so that the most dependable router on a
        network eventually becomes Designated Router.


    7.4.  The Backup Designated Router

        In order to make the transition to a new Designated Router
        smoother, there is a Backup Designated Router for each multi-
        access network.  The Backup Designated Router is also adjacent



Moy                                                            [Page 48]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        to all routers on the network, and becomes Designated Router
        when the previous Designated Router fails.  If there were no
        Backup Designated Router, when a new Designated Router became
        necessary, new adjacencies would have to be formed between the
        new Designated Router and all other routers attached to the
        network.  Part of the adjacency forming process is the
        synchronizing of topological databases, which can potentially
        take quite a long time.  During this time, the network would not
        be available for transit data traffic.  The Backup Designated
        obviates the need to form these adjacencies, since they already
        exist.  This means the period of disruption in transit traffic
        lasts only as long as it takes to flood the new link state
        advertisements (which announce the new Designated Router).

        The Backup Designated Router does not generate a network links
        advertisement for the network.  (If it did, the transition to a
        new Designated Router would be even faster.  However, this is a
        tradeoff between database size and speed of convergence when the
        Designated Router disappears.)

        The Backup Designated Router is also elected by the Hello
        Protocol.  Each Hello Packet has a field that specifies the
        Backup Designated Router for the network.

        In some steps of the flooding procedure, the Backup Designated
        Router plays a passive role, letting the Designated Router do
        more of the work.  This cuts down on the amount of local routing
        traffic.  See Section 13.3 for more information.


    7.5.  The graph of adjacencies

        An adjacency is bound to the network that the two routers have
        in common.  If two routers have multiple networks in common,
        they may have multiple adjacencies between them.

        One can picture the collection of adjacencies on a network as
        forming an undirected graph.  The vertices consist of routers,
        with an edge joining two routers if they are adjacent.  The
        graph of adjacencies describes the flow of routing protocol
        packets, and in particular Link State Update Packets, through
        the Autonomous System.

        Two graphs are possible, depending on whether the common network
        is multi-access.  On physical point-to-point networks (and
        virtual links), the two routers joined by the network will be
        adjacent after their databases have been synchronized.  On
        multi-access networks, both the Designated Router and the Backup



Moy                                                            [Page 49]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        Designated Router are adjacent to all other routers attached to
        the network, and these account for all adjacencies.

        These graphs are shown in Figure 10.  It is assumed that Router
        RT7 has become the Designated Router, and Router RT3 the Backup
        Designated Router, for the Network N2.  The Backup Designated
        Router performs a lesser function during the flooding procedure
        than the Designated Router (see Section 13.3).  This is the
        reason for the dashed lines connecting the Backup Designated
        Router RT3.


8.  Protocol Packet Processing

    This section discusses the general processing of OSPF routing
    protocol packets.  It is very important that the router topological
    databases remain synchronized.  For this reason, routing protocol
    packets should get preferential treatment over ordinary data
    packets, both in sending and receiving.

    Routing protocol packets are sent along adjacencies only (with the



          +---+            +---+
          |RT1|------------|RT2|            o---------------o
          +---+    N1      +---+           RT1             RT2



                                                 RT7
                                                  o---------+
            +---+   +---+   +---+                /|\        |
            |RT7|   |RT3|   |RT4|               / | \       |
            +---+   +---+   +---+              /  |  \      |
              |       |       |               /   |   \     |
         +-----------------------+        RT5o RT6o    oRT4 |
                  |       |     N2            *   *   *     |
                +---+   +---+                  *  *  *      |
                |RT5|   |RT6|                   * * *       |
                +---+   +---+                    ***        |
                                                  o---------+
                                                 RT3


                  Figure 10: The graph of adjacencies





Moy                                                            [Page 50]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    exception of Hello packets, which are used to discover the
    adjacencies).  This means that all routing protocol packets travel a
    single IP hop, except those sent over virtual links.

    All routing protocol packets begin with a standard header.  The
    sections below give the details on how to fill in and verify this
    standard header.  Then, for each packet type, the section is listed
    that gives more details on that particular packet type's processing.

    8.1.  Sending protocol packets

        When a router sends a routing protocol packet, it fills in the
        fields of the standard OSPF packet header as follows.  For more
        details on the header format consult Section A.3.1:


        Version #
            Set to 2, the version number of the protocol as documented
            in this specification.

        Packet type
            The type of OSPF packet, such as Link state Update or Hello
            Packet.

        Packet length
            The length of the entire OSPF packet in bytes, including the
            standard OSPF packet header.

        Router ID
            The identity of the router itself (who is originating the
            packet).

        Area ID
            The OSPF area that the packet is being sent into.

        Checksum
            The standard IP 16-bit one's complement checksum of the
            entire OSPF packet, excluding the 64-bit authentication
            field.  This checksum should be calculated before handing
            the packet to the appropriate authentication procedure.

        AuType and Authentication
            Each OSPF packet exchange is authenticated.  Authentication
            types are assigned by the protocol and documented in
            Appendix D.  A different authentication scheme can be used
            for each OSPF area.  The 64-bit authentication field is set
            by the appropriate authentication procedure (determined by
            AuType).  This procedure should be the last called when



Moy                                                            [Page 51]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            forming the packet to be sent.  The setting of the
            authentication field is determined by the packet contents
            and the authentication key (which is configurable on a per-
            interface basis).


        The IP destination address for the packet is selected as
        follows.  On physical point-to-point networks, the IP
        destination is always set to the address AllSPFRouters.  On all
        other network types (including virtual links), the majority of
        OSPF packets are sent as unicasts, i.e., sent directly to the
        other end of the adjacency.  In this case, the IP destination is
        just the Neighbor IP address associated with the other end of
        the adjacency (see Section 10).  The only packets not sent as
        unicasts are on broadcast networks; on these networks Hello
        packets are sent to the multicast destination AllSPFRouters, the
        Designated Router and its Backup send both Link State Update
        Packets and Link State Acknowledgment Packets to the multicast
        address AllSPFRouters, while all other routers send both their
        Link State Update and Link State Acknowledgment Packets to the
        multicast address AllDRouters.

        Retransmissions of Link State Update packets are ALWAYS sent as
        unicasts.

        The IP source address should be set to the IP address of the
        sending interface.  Interfaces to unnumbered point-to-point
        networks have no associated IP address.  On these interfaces,
        the IP source should be set to any of the other IP addresses
        belonging to the router.  For this reason, there must be at
        least one IP address assigned to the router.[2] Note that, for
        most purposes, virtual links act precisely the same as
        unnumbered point-to-point networks.  However, each virtual link
        does have an IP interface address (discovered during the routing
        table build process) which is used as the IP source when sending
        packets over the virtual link.

        For more information on the format of specific OSPF packet
        types, consult the sections listed in Table 10.












Moy                                                            [Page 52]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994



             Type   Packet name            detailed section (transmit)
             _________________________________________________________
             1      Hello                  Section  9.5
             2      Database description   Section 10.8
             3      Link state request     Section 10.9
             4      Link state update      Section 13.3
             5      Link state ack         Section 13.5


            Table 10: Sections describing OSPF protocol packet transmission.



    8.2.  Receiving protocol packets

        Whenever a protocol packet is received by the router it is
        marked with the interface it was received on.  For routers that
        have virtual links configured, it may not be immediately obvious
        which interface to associate the packet with.  For example,
        consider the Router RT11 depicted in Figure 6.  If RT11 receives
        an OSPF protocol packet on its interface to Network N8, it may
        want to associate the packet with the interface to Area 2, or
        with the virtual link to Router RT10 (which is part of the
        backbone).  In the following, we assume that the packet is
        initially associated with the non-virtual  link.[3]

        In order for the packet to be accepted at the IP level, it must
        pass a number of tests, even before the packet is passed to OSPF
        for processing:


        o   The IP checksum must be correct.

        o   The packet's IP destination address must be the IP address
            of the receiving interface, or one of the IP multicast
            addresses AllSPFRouters or AllDRouters.

        o   The IP protocol specified must be OSPF (89).

        o   Locally originated packets should not be passed on to OSPF.
            That is, the source IP address should be examined to make
            sure this is not a multicast packet that the router itself
            generated.


        Next, the OSPF packet header is verified.  The fields specified
        in the header must match those configured for the receiving



Moy                                                            [Page 53]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        interface.  If they do not, the packet should be discarded:


        o   The version number field must specify protocol version 2.

        o   The 16-bit one's complement checksum of the OSPF packet's
            contents must be verified.  Remember that the 64-bit
            authentication field must be excluded from the checksum
            calculation.

        o   The Area ID found in the OSPF header must be verified.  If
            both of the following cases fail, the packet should be
            discarded.  The Area ID specified in the header must either:

            (1) Match the Area ID of the receiving interface.  In this
                case, the packet has been sent over a single hop.
                Therefore, the packet's IP source address must be on the
                same network as the receiving interface.  This can be
                determined by comparing the packet's IP source address
                to the interface's IP address, after masking both
                addresses with the interface mask.  This comparison
                should not be performed on point-to-point networks. On
                point-to-point networks, the interface addresses of each
                end of the link are assigned independently, if they are
                assigned at all.

            (2) Indicate the backbone.  In this case, the packet has
                been sent over a virtual link.  The receiving router
                must be an area border router, and the Router ID
                specified in the packet (the source router) must be the
                other end of a configured virtual link.  The receiving
                interface must also attach to the virtual link's
                configured Transit area.  If all of these checks
                succeed, the packet is accepted and is from now on
                associated with the virtual link (and the backbone
                area).

        o   Packets whose IP destination is AllDRouters should only be
            accepted if the state of the receiving interface is DR or
            Backup (see Section 9.1).

        o   The AuType specified in the packet must match the AuType
            specified for the associated area.


        Next, the packet must be authenticated.  This depends on the
        AuType specified (see Appendix D).  The authentication procedure
        may use an Authentication key, which can be configured on a



Moy                                                            [Page 54]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        per-interface basis.  If the authentication fails, the packet
        should be discarded.

        If the packet type is Hello, it should then be further processed
        by the Hello Protocol (see Section 10.5).  All other packet
        types are sent/received only on adjacencies.  This means that
        the packet must have been sent by one of the router's active
        neighbors.  If the receiving interface is a multi-access network
        (either broadcast or non-broadcast) the sender is identified by
        the IP source address found in the packet's IP header.  If the
        receiving interface is a point-to-point link or a virtual link,
        the sender is identified by the Router ID (source router) found
        in the packet's OSPF header.  The data structure associated with
        the receiving interface contains the list of active neighbors.
        Packets not matching any active neighbor are discarded.

        At this point all received protocol packets are associated with
        an active neighbor.  For the further input processing of
        specific packet types, consult the sections listed in Table 11.



              Type   Packet name            detailed section (receive)
              ________________________________________________________
              1      Hello                  Section 10.5
              2      Database description   Section 10.6
              3      Link state request     Section 10.7
              4      Link state update      Section 13
              5      Link state ack         Section 13.7


            Table 11: Sections describing OSPF protocol packet reception.



9.  The Interface Data Structure

    An OSPF interface is the connection between a router and a network.
    There is a single OSPF interface structure for each attached
    network; each interface structure has at most one IP interface
    address (see below).  The support for multiple addresses on a single
    network is a matter for future consideration.

    An OSPF interface can be considered to belong to the area that
    contains the attached network.  All routing protocol packets
    originated by the router over this interface are labelled with the
    interface's Area ID.  One or more router adjacencies may develop
    over an interface.  A router's link state advertisements reflect the



Moy                                                            [Page 55]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    state of its interfaces and their associated adjacencies.

    The following data items are associated with an interface.  Note
    that a number of these items are actually configuration for the
    attached network; those items must be the same for all routers
    connected to the network.


    Type
        The kind of network to which the interface attaches.  Its value
        is either broadcast, non-broadcast yet still multi-access,
        point-to-point or virtual link.

    State
        The functional level of an interface.  State determines whether
        or not full adjacencies are allowed to form over the interface.
        State is also reflected in the router's link state
        advertisements.

    IP interface address
        The IP address associated with the interface.  This appears as
        the IP source address in all routing protocol packets originated
        over this interface.  Interfaces to unnumbered point-to-point
        networks do not have an associated IP address.

    IP interface mask
        Also referred to as the subnet mask, this indicates the portion
        of the IP interface address that identifies the attached
        network.  Masking the IP interface address with the IP interface
        mask yields the IP network number of the attached network.  On
        point-to-point networks and virtual links, the IP interface mask
        is not defined. On these networks, the link itself is not
        assigned an IP network number, and so the addresses of each side
        of the link are assigned independently, if they are assigned at
        all.

    Area ID
        The Area ID of the area to which the attached network belongs.
        All routing protocol packets originating from the interface are
        labelled with this Area ID.

    HelloInterval
        The length of time, in seconds, between the Hello packets that
        the router sends on the interface.  Advertised in Hello packets
        sent out this interface.

    RouterDeadInterval
        The number of seconds before the router's neighbors will declare



Moy                                                            [Page 56]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        it down, when they stop hearing the router's Hello Packets.
        Advertised in Hello packets sent out this interface.

    InfTransDelay
        The estimated number of seconds it takes to transmit a Link
        State Update Packet over this interface.  Link state
        advertisements contained in the Link State Update packet will
        have their age incremented by this amount before transmission.
        This value should take into account transmission and propagation
        delays; it must be greater than zero.

    Router Priority
        An 8-bit unsigned integer.  When two routers attached to a
        network both attempt to become Designated Router, the one with
        the highest Router Priority takes precedence.  A router whose
        Router Priority is set to 0 is ineligible to become Designated
        Router on the attached network.  Advertised in Hello packets
        sent out this interface.

    Hello Timer
        An interval timer that causes the interface to send a Hello
        packet.  This timer fires every HelloInterval seconds.  Note
        that on non-broadcast networks a separate Hello packet is sent
        to each qualified neighbor.

    Wait Timer
        A single shot timer that causes the interface to exit the
        Waiting state, and as a consequence select a Designated Router
        on the network.  The length of the timer is RouterDeadInterval
        seconds.

    List of neighboring routers
        The other routers attached to this network.  On multi-access
        networks, this list is formed by the Hello Protocol.
        Adjacencies will be formed to some of these neighbors.  The set
        of adjacent neighbors can be determined by an examination of all
        of the neighbors' states.

    Designated Router
        The Designated Router selected for the attached network.  The
        Designated Router is selected on all multi-access networks by
        the Hello Protocol.  Two pieces of identification are kept for
        the Designated Router: its Router ID and its IP interface
        address on the network.  The Designated Router advertises link
        state for the network; this network link state advertisement is
        labelled with the Designated Router's IP address.  The
        Designated Router is initialized to 0.0.0.0, which indicates the
        lack of a Designated Router.



Moy                                                            [Page 57]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    Backup Designated Router
        The Backup Designated Router is also selected on all multi-
        access networks by the Hello Protocol.  All routers on the
        attached network become adjacent to both the Designated Router
        and the Backup Designated Router.  The Backup Designated Router
        becomes Designated Router when the current Designated Router
        fails.  The Backup Designated Router is initialized to 0.0.0.0,
        indicating the lack of a Backup Designated Router.

    Interface output cost(s)
        The cost of sending a data packet on the interface, expressed in
        the link state metric.  This is advertised as the link cost for
        this interface in the router links advertisement.  There may be
        a separate cost for each IP Type of Service.  The cost of an
        interface must be greater than zero.

    RxmtInterval
        The number of seconds between link state advertisement
        retransmissions, for adjacencies belonging to this interface.
        Also used when retransmitting Database Description and Link
        State Request Packets.

    Authentication key
        This configured data allows the authentication procedure to
        generate and/or verify the Authentication field in the OSPF
        header.  The Authentication key can be configured on a per-
        interface basis.  For example, if the AuType indicates simple
        password, the Authentication key would be a 64-bit password.
        This key would be inserted directly into the OSPF header when
        originating routing protocol packets, and there could be a
        separate password for each network.


    9.1.  Interface states

        The various states that router interfaces may attain is
        documented in this section.  The states are listed in order of
        progressing functionality.  For example, the inoperative state
        is listed first, followed by a list of intermediate states
        before the final, fully functional state is achieved.  The
        specification makes use of this ordering by sometimes making
        references such as "those interfaces in state greater than X".
        Figure 11 shows the graph of interface state changes.  The arcs
        of the graph are labelled with the event causing the state
        change.  These events are documented in Section 9.2.  The
        interface state machine is described in more detail in Section
        9.3.




Moy                                                            [Page 58]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994



                                  +----+   UnloopInd   +--------+
                                  |Down|<--------------|Loopback|
                                  +----+               +--------+
                                     |
                                     |InterfaceUp
                          +-------+  |               +--------------+
                          |Waiting|<-+-------------->|Point-to-point|
                          +-------+                  +--------------+
                              |
                     WaitTimer|BackupSeen
                              |
                              |
                              |   NeighborChange
          +------+           +-+<---------------- +-------+
          |Backup|<----------|?|----------------->|DROther|
          +------+---------->+-+<-----+           +-------+
                    Neighbor  |       |
                    Change    |       |Neighbor
                              |       |Change
                              |     +--+
                              +---->|DR|
                                    +--+

                      Figure 11: Interface State changes

                 In addition to the state transitions pictured,
                 Event InterfaceDown always forces Down State, and
                 Event LoopInd always forces Loopback State


        Down
            This is the initial interface state.  In this state, the
            lower-level protocols have indicated that the interface is
            unusable.  No protocol traffic at all will be sent or
            received on such a interface.  In this state, interface
            parameters should be set to their initial values.  All
            interface timers should be disabled, and there should be no
            adjacencies associated with the interface.

        Loopback
            In this state, the router's interface to the network is
            looped back.  The interface may be looped back in hardware
            or software.  The interface will be unavailable for regular
            data traffic.  However, it may still be desirable to gain
            information on the quality of this interface, either through
            sending ICMP pings to the interface or through something
            like a bit error test.  For this reason, IP packets may



Moy                                                            [Page 59]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            still be addressed to an interface in Loopback state.  To
            facilitate this, such interfaces are advertised in router
            links advertisements as single host routes, whose
            destination is the IP interface address.[4]

        Waiting
            In this state, the router is trying to determine the
            identity of the (Backup) Designated Router for the network.
            To do this, the router monitors the Hello Packets it
            receives.  The router is not allowed to elect a Backup
            Designated Router nor a Designated Router until it
            transitions out of Waiting state.  This prevents unnecessary
            changes of (Backup) Designated Router.

        Point-to-point
            In this state, the interface is operational, and connects
            either to a physical point-to-point network or to a virtual
            link.  Upon entering this state, the router attempts to form
            an adjacency with the neighboring router.  Hello Packets are
            sent to the neighbor every HelloInterval seconds.

        DR Other
            The interface is to a multi-access network on which another
            router has been selected to be the Designated Router.  In
            this state, the router itself has not been selected Backup
            Designated Router either.  The router forms adjacencies to
            both the Designated Router and the Backup Designated Router
            (if they exist).

        Backup
            In this state, the router itself is the Backup Designated
            Router on the attached network.  It will be promoted to
            Designated Router when the present Designated Router fails.
            The router establishes adjacencies to all other routers
            attached to the network.  The Backup Designated Router
            performs slightly different functions during the Flooding
            Procedure, as compared to the Designated Router (see Section
            13.3).  See Section 7.4 for more details on the functions
            performed by the Backup Designated Router.

        DR  In this state, this router itself is the Designated Router
            on the attached network.  Adjacencies are established to all
            other routers attached to the network.  The router must also
            originate a network links advertisement for the network
            node.  The advertisement will contain links to all routers
            (including the Designated Router itself) attached to the
            network.  See Section 7.3 for more details on the functions
            performed by the Designated Router.



Moy                                                            [Page 60]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    9.2.  Events causing interface state changes

        State changes can be effected by a number of events.  These
        events are pictured as the labelled arcs in Figure 11.  The
        label definitions are listed below.  For a detailed explanation
        of the effect of these events on OSPF protocol operation,
        consult Section 9.3.


        InterfaceUp
            Lower-level protocols have indicated that the network
            interface is operational.  This enables the interface to
            transition out of Down state.  On virtual links, the
            interface operational indication is actually a result of the
            shortest path calculation (see Section 16.7).

        WaitTimer
            The Wait Timer has fired, indicating the end of the waiting
            period that is required before electing a (Backup)
            Designated Router.

        BackupSeen
            The router has detected the existence or non-existence of a
            Backup Designated Router for the network.  This is done in
            one of two ways.  First, an Hello Packet may be received
            from a neighbor claiming to be itself the Backup Designated
            Router.  Alternatively, an Hello Packet may be received from
            a neighbor claiming to be itself the Designated Router, and
            indicating that there is no Backup Designated Router.  In
            either case there must be bidirectional communication with
            the neighbor, i.e., the router must also appear in the
            neighbor's Hello Packet.  This event signals an end to the
            Waiting state.

        NeighborChange
            There has been a change in the set of bidirectional
            neighbors associated with the interface.  The (Backup)
            Designated Router needs to be recalculated.  The following
            neighbor changes lead to the NeighborChange event.  For an
            explanation of neighbor states, see Section 10.1.

            o   Bidirectional communication has been established to a
                neighbor.  In other words, the state of the neighbor has
                transitioned to 2-Way or higher.

            o   There is no longer bidirectional communication with a
                neighbor.  In other words, the state of the neighbor has
                transitioned to Init or lower.



Moy                                                            [Page 61]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            o   One of the bidirectional neighbors is newly declaring
                itself as either Designated Router or Backup Designated
                Router.  This is detected through examination of that
                neighbor's Hello Packets.

            o   One of the bidirectional neighbors is no longer
                declaring itself as Designated Router, or is no longer
                declaring itself as Backup Designated Router.  This is
                again detected through examination of that neighbor's
                Hello Packets.

            o   The advertised Router Priority for a bidirectional
                neighbor has changed.  This is again detected through
                examination of that neighbor's Hello Packets.

        LoopInd
            An indication has been received that the interface is now
            looped back to itself.  This indication can be received
            either from network management or from the lower level
            protocols.

        UnloopInd
            An indication has been received that the interface is no
            longer looped back.  As with the LoopInd event, this
            indication can be received either from network management or
            from the lower level protocols.

        InterfaceDown
            Lower-level protocols indicate that this interface is no
            longer functional.  No matter what the current interface
            state is, the new interface state will be Down.


    9.3.  The Interface state machine

        A detailed description of the interface state changes follows.
        Each state change is invoked by an event (Section 9.2).  This
        event may produce different effects, depending on the current
        state of the interface.  For this reason, the state machine
        below is organized by current interface state and received
        event.  Each entry in the state machine describes the resulting
        new interface state and the required set of additional actions.

        When an interface's state changes, it may be necessary to
        originate a new router links advertisement.  See Section 12.4
        for more details.

        Some of the required actions below involve generating events for



Moy                                                            [Page 62]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        the neighbor state machine.  For example, when an interface
        becomes inoperative, all neighbor connections associated with
        the interface must be destroyed.  For more information on the
        neighbor state machine, see Section 10.3.


         State(s):  Down

            Event:  InterfaceUp

        New state:  Depends upon action routine

           Action:  Start the interval Hello Timer, enabling the
                    periodic sending of Hello packets out the interface.
                    If the attached network is a physical point-to-point
                    network or virtual link, the interface state
                    transitions to Point-to-Point.  Else, if the router
                    is not eligible to become Designated Router the
                    interface state transitions to DR Other.

                    Otherwise, the attached network is multi-access and
                    the router is eligible to become Designated Router.
                    In this case, in an attempt to discover the attached
                    network's Designated Router the interface state is
                    set to Waiting and the single shot Wait Timer is
                    started.  If in addition the attached network is
                    non-broadcast, examine the configured list of
                    neighbors for this interface and generate the
                    neighbor event Start for each neighbor that is also
                    eligible to become Designated Router.


         State(s):  Waiting

            Event:  BackupSeen

        New state:  Depends upon action routine.

           Action:  Calculate the attached network's Backup Designated
                    Router and Designated Router, as shown in Section
                    9.4.  As a result of this calculation, the new state
                    of the interface will be either DR Other, Backup or
                    DR.


         State(s):  Waiting





Moy                                                            [Page 63]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            Event:  WaitTimer

        New state:  Depends upon action routine.

           Action:  Calculate the attached network's Backup Designated
                    Router and Designated Router, as shown in Section
                    9.4.  As a result of this calculation, the new state
                    of the interface will be either DR Other, Backup or
                    DR.


         State(s):  DR Other, Backup or DR

            Event:  NeighborChange

        New state:  Depends upon action routine.

           Action:  Recalculate the attached network's Backup Designated
                    Router and Designated Router, as shown in Section
                    9.4.  As a result of this calculation, the new state
                    of the interface will be either DR Other, Backup or
                    DR.


         State(s):  Any State

            Event:  InterfaceDown

        New state:  Down

           Action:  All interface variables are reset, and interface
                    timers disabled.  Also, all neighbor connections
                    associated with the interface are destroyed.  This
                    is done by generating the event KillNbr on all
                    associated neighbors (see Section 10.2).


         State(s):  Any State

            Event:  LoopInd

        New state:  Loopback

           Action:  Since this interface is no longer connected to the
                    attached network the actions associated with the
                    above InterfaceDown event are executed.





Moy                                                            [Page 64]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


         State(s):  Loopback

            Event:  UnloopInd

        New state:  Down

           Action:  No actions are necessary.  For example, the
                    interface variables have already been reset upon
                    entering the Loopback state.  Note that reception of
                    an InterfaceUp event is necessary before the
                    interface again becomes fully functional.


    9.4.  Electing the Designated Router

        This section describes the algorithm used for calculating a
        network's Designated Router and Backup Designated Router.  This
        algorithm is invoked by the Interface state machine.  The
        initial time a router runs the election algorithm for a network,
        the network's Designated Router and Backup Designated Router are
        initialized to 0.0.0.0.  This indicates the lack of both a
        Designated Router and a Backup Designated Router.

        The Designated Router election algorithm proceeds as follows:
        Call the router doing the calculation Router X.  The list of
        neighbors attached to the network and having established
        bidirectional communication with Router X is examined.  This
        list is precisely the collection of Router X's neighbors (on
        this network) whose state is greater than or equal to 2-Way (see
        Section 10.1).  Router X itself is also considered to be on the
        list.  Discard all routers from the list that are ineligible to
        become Designated Router.  (Routers having Router Priority of 0
        are ineligible to become Designated Router.)  The following
        steps are then executed, considering only those routers that
        remain on the list:


        (1) Note the current values for the network's Designated Router
            and Backup Designated Router.  This is used later for
            comparison purposes.

        (2) Calculate the new Backup Designated Router for the network
            as follows.  Only those routers on the list that have not
            declared themselves to be Designated Router are eligible to
            become Backup Designated Router.  If one or more of these
            routers have declared themselves Backup Designated Router
            (i.e., they are currently listing themselves as Backup
            Designated Router, but not as Designated Router, in their



Moy                                                            [Page 65]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            Hello Packets) the one having highest Router Priority is
            declared to be Backup Designated Router.  In case of a tie,
            the one having the highest Router ID is chosen.  If no
            routers have declared themselves Backup Designated Router,
            choose the router having highest Router Priority, (again
            excluding those routers who have declared themselves
            Designated Router), and again use the Router ID to break
            ties.

        (3) Calculate the new Designated Router for the network as
            follows.  If one or more of the routers have declared
            themselves Designated Router (i.e., they are currently
            listing themselves as Designated Router in their Hello
            Packets) the one having highest Router Priority is declared
            to be Designated Router.  In case of a tie, the one having
            the highest Router ID is chosen.  If no routers have
            declared themselves Designated Router, assign the Designated
            Router to be the same as the newly elected Backup Designated
            Router.

        (4) If Router X is now newly the Designated Router or newly the
            Backup Designated Router, or is now no longer the Designated
            Router or no longer the Backup Designated Router, repeat
            steps 2 and 3, and then proceed to step 5.  For example, if
            Router X is now the Designated Router, when step 2 is
            repeated X will no longer be eligible for Backup Designated
            Router election.  Among other things, this will ensure that
            no router will declare itself both Backup Designated Router
            and Designated Router.[5]

        (5) As a result of these calculations, the router itself may now
            be Designated Router or Backup Designated Router.  See
            Sections 7.3 and 7.4 for the additional duties this would
            entail.  The router's interface state should be set
            accordingly.  If the router itself is now Designated Router,
            the new interface state is DR.  If the router itself is now
            Backup Designated Router, the new interface state is Backup.
            Otherwise, the new interface state is DR Other.

        (6) If the attached network is non-broadcast, and the router
            itself has just become either Designated Router or Backup
            Designated Router, it must start sending Hello Packets to
            those neighbors that are not eligible to become Designated
            Router (see Section 9.5.1).  This is done by invoking the
            neighbor event Start for each neighbor having a Router
            Priority of 0.





Moy                                                            [Page 66]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        (7) If the above calculations have caused the identity of either
            the Designated Router or Backup Designated Router to change,
            the set of adjacencies associated with this interface will
            need to be modified.  Some adjacencies may need to be
            formed, and others may need to be broken.  To accomplish
            this, invoke the event AdjOK?  on all neighbors whose state
            is at least 2-Way.  This will cause their eligibility for
            adjacency to be reexamined (see Sections 10.3 and 10.4).


        The reason behind the election algorithm's complexity is the
        desire for an orderly transition from Backup Designated Router
        to Designated Router, when the current Designated Router fails.
        This orderly transition is ensured through the introduction of
        hysteresis: no new Backup Designated Router can be chosen until
        the old Backup accepts its new Designated Router
        responsibilities.

        The above procedure may elect the same router to be both
        Designated Router and Backup Designated Router, although that
        router will never be the calculating router (Router X) itself.
        The elected Designated Router may not be the router having the
        highest Router Priority, nor will the Backup Designated Router
        necessarily have the second highest Router Priority.  If Router
        X is not itself eligible to become Designated Router, it is
        possible that neither a Backup Designated Router nor a
        Designated Router will be selected in the above procedure.  Note
        also that if Router X is the only attached router that is
        eligible to become Designated Router, it will select itself as
        Designated Router and there will be no Backup Designated Router
        for the network.


    9.5.  Sending Hello packets

        Hello packets are sent out each functioning router interface.
        They are used to discover and maintain neighbor
        relationships.[6] On multi-access networks, Hello Packets are
        also used to elect the Designated Router and Backup Designated
        Router, and in that way determine what adjacencies should be
        formed.

        The format of an Hello packet is detailed in Section A.3.2.  The
        Hello Packet contains the router's Router Priority (used in
        choosing the Designated Router), and the interval between Hello
        Packets sent out the interface (HelloInterval).  The Hello
        Packet also indicates how often a neighbor must be heard from to
        remain active (RouterDeadInterval).  Both HelloInterval and



Moy                                                            [Page 67]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        RouterDeadInterval must be the same for all routers attached to
        a common network.  The Hello packet also contains the IP address
        mask of the attached network (Network Mask).  On unnumbered
        point-to-point networks and on virtual links this field should
        be set to 0.0.0.0.

        The Hello packet's Options field describes the router's optional
        OSPF capabilities.  There are currently two optional
        capabilities defined (see Sections 4.5 and A.2).  The T-bit of
        the Options field should be set if the router is capable of
        calculating separate routes for each IP TOS.  The E-bit should
        be set if and only if the attached area is capable of processing
        AS external advertisements (i.e., it is not a stub area).  If
        the E-bit is set incorrectly the neighboring routers will refuse
        to accept the Hello Packet (see Section 10.5).  The rest of the
        Hello Packet's Options field should be set to zero.

        In order to ensure two-way communication between adjacent
        routers, the Hello packet contains the list of all routers from
        which Hello Packets have been seen recently.  The Hello packet
        also contains the router's current choice for Designated Router
        and Backup Designated Router.  A value of 0.0.0.0 in these
        fields means that one has not yet been selected.

        On broadcast networks and physical point-to-point networks,
        Hello packets are sent every HelloInterval seconds to the IP
        multicast address AllSPFRouters.  On virtual links, Hello
        packets are sent as unicasts (addressed directly to the other
        end of the virtual link) every HelloInterval seconds.  On non-
        broadcast networks, the sending of Hello packets is more
        complicated.  This will be covered in the next section.


        9.5.1.  Sending Hello packets on non-broadcast networks

            Static configuration information is necessary in order for
            the Hello Protocol to function on non-broadcast networks
            (see Section C.5).  Every attached router which is eligible
            to become Designated Router has a configured list of all of
            its neighbors on the network.  Each listed neighbor is
            labelled with its Designated Router eligibility.

            The interface state must be at least Waiting for any Hello
            Packets to be sent.  Hello Packets are then sent directly
            (as unicasts) to some subset of a router's neighbors.
            Sometimes an Hello Packet is sent periodically on a timer;
            at other times it is sent as a response to a received Hello
            Packet.  A router's hello-sending behavior varies depending



Moy                                                            [Page 68]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            on whether the router itself is eligible to become
            Designated Router.

            If the router is eligible to become Designated Router, it
            must periodically send Hello Packets to all neighbors that
            are also eligible.  In addition, if the router is itself the
            Designated Router or Backup Designated Router, it must also
            send periodic Hello Packets to all other neighbors.  This
            means that any two eligible routers are always exchanging
            Hello Packets, which is necessary for the correct operation
            of the Designated Router election algorithm.  To minimize
            the number of Hello Packets sent, the number of eligible
            routers on a non-broadcast network should be kept small.

            If the router is not eligible to become Designated Router,
            it must periodically send Hello Packets to both the
            Designated Router and the Backup Designated Router (if they
            exist).  It must also send an Hello Packet in reply to an
            Hello Packet received from any eligible neighbor (other than
            the current Designated Router and Backup Designated Router).
            This is needed to establish an initial bidirectional
            relationship with any potential Designated Router.

            When sending Hello packets periodically to any neighbor, the
            interval between Hello Packets is determined by the
            neighbor's state.  If the neighbor is in state Down, Hello
            Packets are sent every PollInterval seconds.  Otherwise,
            Hello Packets are sent every HelloInterval seconds.


10.  The Neighbor Data Structure

    An OSPF router converses with its neighboring routers.  Each
    separate conversation is described by a "neighbor data structure".
    Each conversation is bound to a particular OSPF router interface,
    and is identified either by the neighboring router's OSPF Router ID
    or by its Neighbor IP address (see below).  Thus if the OSPF router
    and another router have multiple attached networks in common,
    multiple conversations ensue, each described by a unique neighbor
    data structure.  Each separate conversation is loosely referred to
    in the text as being a separate "neighbor".

    The neighbor data structure contains all information pertinent to
    the forming or formed adjacency between the two neighbors.
    (However, remember that not all neighbors become adjacent.)  An
    adjacency can be viewed as a highly developed conversation between
    two routers.




Moy                                                            [Page 69]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    State
        The functional level of the neighbor conversation.  This is
        described in more detail in Section 10.1.

    Inactivity Timer
        A single shot timer whose firing indicates that no Hello Packet
        has been seen from this neighbor recently.  The length of the
        timer is RouterDeadInterval seconds.

    Master/Slave
        When the two neighbors are exchanging databases, they form a
        master/slave relationship.  The master sends the first Database
        Description Packet, and is the only part that is allowed to
        retransmit.  The slave can only respond to the master's Database
        Description Packets.  The master/slave relationship is
        negotiated in state ExStart.

    DD Sequence Number
        A 32-bit number identifying individual Database Description
        packets.  When the neighbor state ExStart is entered, the DD
        sequence number should be set to a value not previously seen by
        the neighboring router.  One possible scheme is to use the
        machine's time of day counter.  The DD sequence number is then
        incremented by the master with each new Database Description
        packet sent.  The slave's DD sequence number indicates the last
        packet received from the master.  Only one packet is allowed
        outstanding at a time.

    Neighbor ID
        The OSPF Router ID of the neighboring router.  The Neighbor ID
        is learned when Hello packets are received from the neighbor, or
        is configured if this is a virtual adjacency (see Section C.4).

    Neighbor Priority
        The Router Priority of the neighboring router.  Contained in the
        neighbor's Hello packets, this item is used when selecting the
        Designated Router for the attached network.

    Neighbor IP address
        The IP address of the neighboring router's interface to the
        attached network.  Used as the Destination IP address when
        protocol packets are sent as unicasts along this adjacency.
        Also used in router links advertisements as the Link ID for the
        attached network if the neighboring router is selected to be
        Designated Router (see Section 12.4.1).  The Neighbor IP address
        is learned when Hello packets are received from the neighbor.
        For virtual links, the Neighbor IP address is learned during the
        routing table build process (see Section 15).



Moy                                                            [Page 70]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    Neighbor Options
        The optional OSPF capabilities supported by the neighbor.
        Learned during the Database Exchange process (see Section 10.6).
        The neighbor's optional OSPF capabilities are also listed in its
        Hello packets.  This enables received Hello Packets to be
        rejected (i.e., neighbor relationships will not even start to
        form) if there is a mismatch in certain crucial OSPF
        capabilities (see Section 10.5).  The optional OSPF capabilities
        are documented in Section 4.5.

    Neighbor's Designated Router
        The neighbor's idea of the Designated Router.  If this is the
        neighbor itself, this is important in the local calculation of
        the Designated Router.  Defined only on multi-access networks.

    Neighbor's Backup Designated Router
        The neighbor's idea of the Backup Designated Router.  If this is
        the neighbor itself, this is important in the local calculation
        of the Backup Designated Router.  Defined only on multi-access
        networks.


    The next set of variables are lists of link state advertisements.
    These lists describe subsets of the area topological database.
    There can be five distinct types of link state advertisements in an
    area topological database: router links, network links, and Type 3
    and 4 summary links (all stored in the area data structure), and AS
    external links (stored in the global data structure).


    Link state retransmission list
        The list of link state advertisements that have been flooded but
        not acknowledged on this adjacency.  These will be retransmitted
        at intervals until they are acknowledged, or until the adjacency
        is destroyed.

    Database summary list
        The complete list of link state advertisements that make up the
        area topological database, at the moment the neighbor goes into
        Database Exchange state.  This list is sent to the neighbor in
        Database Description packets.

    Link state request list
        The list of link state advertisements that need to be received
        from this neighbor in order to synchronize the two neighbors'
        topological databases.  This list is created as Database
        Description packets are received, and is then sent to the
        neighbor in Link State Request packets.  The list is depleted as



Moy                                                            [Page 71]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        appropriate Link State Update packets are received.


    10.1.  Neighbor states

        The state of a neighbor (really, the state of a conversation
        being held with a neighboring router) is documented in the
        following sections.  The states are listed in order of
        progressing functionality.  For example, the inoperative state
        is listed first, followed by a list of intermediate states
        before the final, fully functional state is achieved.  The
        specification makes use of this ordering by sometimes making
        references such as "those neighbors/adjacencies in state greater
        than X".  Figures 12 and 13 show the graph of neighbor state
        changes.  The arcs of the graphs are labelled with the event
        causing the state change.  The neighbor events are documented in
        Section 10.2.

        The graph in Figure 12 shows the state changes effected by the
        Hello Protocol.  The Hello Protocol is responsible for neighbor

                                   +----+
                                   |Down|
                                   +----+
                                     |                               | Start
                                     |        +-------+
                             Hello   |   +---->|Attempt|
                            Received |         +-------+
                                     |             |
                             +----+<-+             |HelloReceived
                             |Init|<---------------+
                             +----+<--------+
                                |           |
                                |2-Way      |1-Way
                                |Received   |Received
                                |           |
              +-------+         |        +-----+
              |ExStart|<--------+------->|2-Way|
              +-------+                  +-----+

              Figure 12: Neighbor state changes (Hello Protocol)

                  In addition to the state transitions pictured,
                  Event KillNbr always forces Down State,
                  Event InactivityTimer always forces Down State,
                  Event LLDown always forces Down State





Moy                                                            [Page 72]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        acquisition and maintenance, and for ensuring two way
        communication between neighbors.

        The graph in Figure 13 shows the forming of an adjacency.  Not
        every two neighboring routers become adjacent (see Section
        10.4).  The adjacency starts to form when the neighbor is in
        state ExStart.  After the two routers discover their
        master/slave status, the state transitions to Exchange.  At this
        point the neighbor starts to be used in the flooding procedure,
        and the two neighboring routers begin synchronizing their
        databases.  When this synchronization is finished, the neighbor
        is in state Full and we say that the two routers are fully
        adjacent.  At this point the adjacency is listed in link state
        advertisements.

        For a more detailed description of neighbor state changes,
        together with the additional actions involved in each change,
        see Section 10.3.

                                  +-------+
                                  |ExStart|
                                  +-------+
                                    |
                     NegotiationDone|
                                    +->+--------+
                                       |Exchange|
                                    +--+--------+
                                    |
                            Exchange|
                              Done  |
                    +----+          |      +-------+
                    |Full|<---------+----->|Loading|
                    +----+<-+              +-------+
                            |  LoadingDone     |
                            +------------------+

            Figure 13: Neighbor state changes (Database Exchange)

                In addition to the state transitions pictured,
                Event SeqNumberMismatch forces ExStart state,
                Event BadLSReq forces ExStart state,
                Event 1-Way forces Init state,
                Event KillNbr always forces Down State,
                Event InactivityTimer always forces Down State,
                Event LLDown always forces Down State,
                Event AdjOK? leads to adjacency forming/breaking





Moy                                                            [Page 73]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        Down
            This is the initial state of a neighbor conversation.  It
            indicates that there has been no recent information received
            from the neighbor.  On non-broadcast networks, Hello packets
            may still be sent to "Down" neighbors, although at a reduced
            frequency (see Section 9.5.1).

        Attempt
            This state is only valid for neighbors attached to non-
            broadcast networks.  It indicates that no recent information
            has been received from the neighbor, but that a more
            concerted effort should be made to contact the neighbor.
            This is done by sending the neighbor Hello packets at
            intervals of HelloInterval (see Section 9.5.1).

        Init
            In this state, an Hello packet has recently been seen from
            the neighbor.  However, bidirectional communication has not
            yet been established with the neighbor (i.e., the router
            itself did not appear in the neighbor's Hello packet).  All
            neighbors in this state (or higher) are listed in the Hello
            packets sent from the associated interface.

        2-Way
            In this state, communication between the two routers is
            bidirectional.  This has been assured by the operation of
            the Hello Protocol.  This is the most advanced state short
            of beginning adjacency establishment.  The (Backup)
            Designated Router is selected from the set of neighbors in
            state 2-Way or greater.

        ExStart
            This is the first step in creating an adjacency between the
            two neighboring routers.  The goal of this step is to decide
            which router is the master, and to decide upon the initial
            DD sequence number.  Neighbor conversations in this state or
            greater are called adjacencies.

        Exchange
            In this state the router is describing its entire link state
            database by sending Database Description packets to the
            neighbor.  Each Database Description Packet has a DD
            sequence number, and is explicitly acknowledged.  Only one
            Database Description Packet is allowed outstanding at any
            one time.  In this state, Link State Request Packets may
            also be sent asking for the neighbor's more recent
            advertisements.  All adjacencies in Exchange state or
            greater are used by the flooding procedure.  In fact, these



Moy                                                            [Page 74]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            adjacencies are fully capable of transmitting and receiving
            all types of OSPF routing protocol packets.

        Loading
            In this state, Link State Request packets are sent to the
            neighbor asking for the more recent advertisements that have
            been discovered (but not yet received) in the Exchange
            state.

        Full
            In this state, the neighboring routers are fully adjacent.
            These adjacencies will now appear in router links and
            network links advertisements.


    10.2.  Events causing neighbor state changes

        State changes can be effected by a number of events.  These
        events are shown in the labels of the arcs in Figures 12 and 13.
        The label definitions are as follows:


        HelloReceived
            A Hello packet has been received from a neighbor.

        Start
            This is an indication that Hello Packets should now be sent
            to the neighbor at intervals of HelloInterval seconds.  This
            event is generated only for neighbors associated with non-
            broadcast networks.

        2-WayReceived
            Bidirectional communication has been realized between the
            two neighboring routers.  This is indicated by this router
            seeing itself in the other's Hello packet.

        NegotiationDone
            The Master/Slave relationship has been negotiated, and DD
            sequence numbers have been exchanged.  This signals the
            start of the sending/receiving of Database Description
            packets.  For more information on the generation of this
            event, consult Section 10.8.

        ExchangeDone
            Both routers have successfully transmitted a full sequence
            of Database Description packets.  Each router now knows what
            parts of its link state database are out of date.  For more
            information on the generation of this event, consult Section



Moy                                                            [Page 75]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            10.8.

        BadLSReq
            A Link State Request has been received for a link state
            advertisement not contained in the database.  This indicates
            an error in the Database Exchange process.

        Loading Done
            Link State Updates have been received for all out-of-date
            portions of the database.  This is indicated by the Link
            state request list becoming empty after the Database
            Exchange process has completed.

        AdjOK?
            A decision must be made (again) as to whether an adjacency
            should be established/maintained with the neighbor.  This
            event will start some adjacencies forming, and destroy
            others.


        The following events cause well developed neighbors to revert to
        lesser states.  Unlike the above events, these events may occur
        when the neighbor conversation is in any of a number of states.


        SeqNumberMismatch
            A Database Description packet has been received that either
            a) has an unexpected DD sequence number, b) unexpectedly has
            the Init bit set or c) has an Options field differing from
            the last Options field received in a Database Description
            packet.  Any of these conditions indicate that some error
            has occurred during adjacency establishment.

        1-Way
            An Hello packet has been received from the neighbor, in
            which this router is not mentioned.  This indicates that
            communication with the neighbor is not bidirectional.

        KillNbr
            This  is  an  indication that  all  communication  with  the
            neighbor  is now  impossible,  forcing  the  neighbor  to
            revert  to  Down  state.

        InactivityTimer
            The inactivity Timer has fired.  This means that no Hello
            packets have been seen recently from the neighbor.  The
            neighbor reverts to Down state.




Moy                                                            [Page 76]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        LLDown
            This is an indication from the lower level protocols that
            the neighbor is now unreachable.  For example, on an X.25
            network this could be indicated by an X.25 clear indication
            with appropriate cause and diagnostic fields.  This event
            forces the neighbor into Down state.


    10.3.  The Neighbor state machine

        A detailed description of the neighbor state changes follows.
        Each state change is invoked by an event (Section 10.2).  This
        event may produce different effects, depending on the current
        state of the neighbor.  For this reason, the state machine below
        is organized by current neighbor state and received event.  Each
        entry in the state machine describes the resulting new neighbor
        state and the required set of additional actions.

        When a neighbor's state changes, it may be necessary to rerun
        the Designated Router election algorithm.  This is determined by
        whether the interface NeighborChange event is generated (see
        Section 9.2).  Also, if the Interface is in DR state (the router
        is itself Designated Router), changes in neighbor state may
        cause a new network links advertisement to be originated (see
        Section 12.4).

        When the neighbor state machine needs to invoke the interface
        state machine, it should be done as a scheduled task (see
        Section 4.4).  This simplifies things, by ensuring that neither
        state machine will be executed recursively.


         State(s):  Down

            Event:  Start

        New state:  Attempt

           Action:  Send an Hello Packet to the neighbor (this neighbor
                    is always associated with a non-broadcast network)
                    and start the Inactivity Timer for the neighbor.
                    The timer's later firing would indicate that
                    communication with the neighbor was not attained.


         State(s):  Attempt





Moy                                                            [Page 77]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            Event:  HelloReceived

        New state:  Init

           Action:  Restart the Inactivity Timer for the neighbor, since
                    the neighbor has now been heard from.


         State(s):  Down

            Event:  HelloReceived

        New state:  Init

           Action:  Start the Inactivity Timer for the neighbor.  The
                    timer's later firing would indicate that the
                    neighbor is dead.


         State(s):  Init or greater

            Event:  HelloReceived

        New state:  No state change.

           Action:  Restart the Inactivity Timer for the neighbor, since
                    the neighbor has again been heard from.


         State(s):  Init

            Event:  2-WayReceived

        New state:  Depends upon action routine.

           Action:  Determine whether an adjacency should be established
                    with the neighbor (see Section 10.4).  If not, the
                    new neighbor state is 2-Way.

                    Otherwise (an adjacency should be established) the
                    neighbor state transitions to ExStart.  Upon
                    entering this state, the router increments the DD
                    sequence number for this neighbor.  If this is the
                    first time that an adjacency has been attempted, the
                    DD sequence number should be assigned some unique
                    value (like the time of day clock).  It then
                    declares itself master (sets the master/slave bit to
                    master), and starts sending Database Description



Moy                                                            [Page 78]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


                    Packets, with the initialize (I), more (M) and
                    master (MS) bits set.  This Database Description
                    Packet should be otherwise empty.  This Database
                    Description Packet should be retransmitted at
                    intervals of RxmtInterval until the next state is
                    entered (see Section 10.8).


         State(s):  ExStart

            Event:  NegotiationDone

        New state:  Exchange

           Action:  The router must list the contents of its entire area
                    link state database in the neighbor Database summary
                    list.  The area link state database consists of the
                    router links, network links and summary links
                    contained in the area structure, along with the AS
                    external links contained in the global structure.
                    AS external link advertisements are omitted from a
                    virtual neighbor's Database summary list.  AS
                    external advertisements are omitted from the
                    Database summary list if the area has been
                    configured as a stub (see Section 3.6).
                    Advertisements whose age is equal to MaxAge are
                    instead added to the neighbor's Link state
                    retransmission list.  A summary of the Database
                    summary list will be sent to the neighbor in
                    Database Description packets.  Each Database
                    Description Packet has a DD sequence number, and is
                    explicitly acknowledged.  Only one Database
                    Description Packet is allowed outstanding at any one
                    time.  For more detail on the sending and receiving
                    of Database Description packets, see Sections 10.8
                    and 10.6.


         State(s):  Exchange

            Event:  ExchangeDone

        New state:  Depends upon action routine.

           Action:  If the neighbor Link state request list is empty,
                    the new neighbor state is Full.  No other action is
                    required.  This is an adjacency's final state.




Moy                                                            [Page 79]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


                    Otherwise, the new neighbor state is Loading.  Start
                    (or continue) sending Link State Request packets to
                    the neighbor (see Section 10.9).  These are requests
                    for the neighbor's more recent advertisements (which
                    were discovered but not yet received in the Exchange
                    state).  These advertisements are listed in the Link
                    state request list associated with the neighbor.


         State(s):  Loading

            Event:  Loading Done

        New state:  Full

           Action:  No action required.  This is an adjacency's final
                    state.


         State(s):  2-Way

            Event:  AdjOK?

        New state:  Depends upon action routine.

           Action:  Determine whether an adjacency should be formed with
                    the neighboring router (see Section 10.4).  If not,
                    the neighbor state remains at 2-Way.  Otherwise,
                    transition the neighbor state to ExStart and perform
                    the actions associated with the above state machine
                    entry for state Init and event 2-WayReceived.


         State(s):  ExStart or greater

            Event:  AdjOK?

        New state:  Depends upon action routine.

           Action:  Determine whether the neighboring router should
                    still be adjacent.  If yes, there is no state change
                    and no further action is necessary.

                    Otherwise, the (possibly partially formed) adjacency
                    must be destroyed.  The neighbor state transitions
                    to 2-Way.  The Link state retransmission list,
                    Database summary list and Link state request list
                    are cleared of link state advertisements.



Moy                                                            [Page 80]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


         State(s):  Exchange or greater

            Event:  SeqNumberMismatch

        New state:  ExStart

           Action:  The (possibly partially formed) adjacency is torn
                    down, and then an attempt is made at
                    reestablishment.  The neighbor state first
                    transitions to ExStart.  The Link state
                    retransmission list, Database summary list and Link
                    state request list are cleared of link state
                    advertisements.  Then the router increments the DD
                    sequence number for this neighbor, declares itself
                    master (sets the master/slave bit to master), and
                    starts sending Database Description Packets, with
                    the initialize (I), more (M) and master (MS) bits
                    set.  This Database Description Packet should be
                    otherwise empty (see Section 10.8).


         State(s):  Exchange or greater

            Event:  BadLSReq

        New state:  ExStart

           Action:  The action for event BadLSReq is exactly the same as
                    for the neighbor event SeqNumberMismatch.  The
                    (possibly partially formed) adjacency is torn down,
                    and then an attempt is made at reestablishment.  For
                    more information, see the neighbor state machine
                    entry that is invoked when event SeqNumberMismatch
                    is generated in state Exchange or greater.


         State(s):  Any state

            Event:  KillNbr

        New state:  Down

           Action:  The Link state retransmission list, Database summary
                    list and Link state request list are cleared of link
                    state advertisements.  Also, the Inactivity Timer is
                    disabled.





Moy                                                            [Page 81]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


         State(s):  Any state

            Event:  LLDown

        New state:  Down

           Action:  The Link state retransmission list, Database summary
                    list and Link state request list are cleared of link
                    state advertisements.  Also, the Inactivity Timer is
                    disabled.


         State(s):  Any state

            Event:  InactivityTimer

        New state:  Down

           Action:  The Link state retransmission list, Database summary
                    list and Link state request list are cleared of link
                    state advertisements.


         State(s):  2-Way or greater

            Event:  1-WayReceived

        New state:  Init

           Action:  The Link state retransmission list, Database summary
                    list and Link state request list are cleared of link
                    state advertisements.


         State(s):  2-Way or greater

            Event:  2-WayReceived

        New state:  No state change.

           Action:  No action required.


         State(s):  Init

            Event:  1-WayReceived





Moy                                                            [Page 82]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        New state:  No state change.

           Action:  No action required.


    10.4.  Whether to become adjacent

        Adjacencies are established with some subset of the router's
        neighbors.  Routers connected by point-to-point networks and
        virtual links always become adjacent.  On multi-access networks,
        all routers become adjacent to both the Designated Router and
        the Backup Designated Router.

        The adjacency-forming decision occurs in two places in the
        neighbor state machine.  First, when bidirectional communication
        is initially established with the neighbor, and secondly, when
        the identity of the attached network's (Backup) Designated
        Router changes.  If the decision is made to not attempt an
        adjacency, the state of the neighbor communication stops at 2-
        Way.

        An adjacency should be established with a bidirectional neighbor
        when at least one of the following conditions holds:


        o   The underlying network type is point-to-point

        o   The underlying network type is virtual link

        o   The router itself is the Designated Router

        o   The router itself is the Backup Designated Router

        o   The neighboring router is the Designated Router

        o   The neighboring router is the Backup Designated Router


    10.5.  Receiving Hello Packets

        This section explains the detailed processing of a received
        Hello Packet.  (See Section A.3.2 for the format of Hello
        packets.)  The generic input processing of OSPF packets will
        have checked the validity of the IP header and the OSPF packet
        header.  Next, the values of the Network Mask, HelloInterval,
        and RouterDeadInterval fields in the received Hello packet must
        be checked against the values configured for the receiving
        interface.  Any mismatch causes processing to stop and the



Moy                                                            [Page 83]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        packet to be dropped.  In other words, the above fields are
        really describing the attached network's configuration. However,
        there is one exception to the above rule: on point-to-point
        networks and on virtual links, the Network Mask in the received
        Hello Packet should be ignored.

        The receiving interface attaches to a single OSPF area (this
        could be the backbone).  The setting of the E-bit found in the
        Hello Packet's Options field must match this area's
        ExternalRoutingCapability.  If AS external advertisements are
        not flooded into/throughout the area (i.e, the area is a "stub")
        the E-bit must be clear in received Hello Packets, otherwise the
        E-bit must be set.  A mismatch causes processing to stop and the
        packet to be dropped.  The setting of the rest of the bits in
        the Hello Packet's Options field should be ignored.

        At this point, an attempt is made to match the source of the
        Hello Packet to one of the receiving interface's neighbors.  If
        the receiving interface is a multi-access network (either
        broadcast or non-broadcast) the source is identified by the IP
        source address found in the Hello's IP header.  If the receiving
        interface is a point-to-point link or a virtual link, the source
        is identified by the Router ID found in the Hello's OSPF packet
        header.  The interface's current list of neighbors is contained
        in the interface's data structure.  If a matching neighbor
        structure cannot be found, (i.e., this is the first time the
        neighbor has been detected), one is created.  The initial state
        of a newly created neighbor is set to Down.

        When receiving an Hello Packet from a neighbor on a multi-access
        network (broadcast or non-broadcast), set the neighbor
        structure's Neighbor ID equal to the Router ID found in the
        packet's OSPF header.  When receiving an Hello on a point-to-
        point network (but not on a virtual link) set the neighbor
        structure's Neighbor IP address to the packet's IP source
        address.

        Now the rest of the Hello Packet is examined, generating events
        to be given to the neighbor and interface state machines.  These
        state machines are specified either to be executed or scheduled
        (see Section 4.4).  For example, by specifying below that the
        neighbor state machine be executed in line, several neighbor
        state transitions may be effected by a single received Hello:


        o   Each Hello Packet causes the neighbor state machine to be
            executed with the event HelloReceived.




Moy                                                            [Page 84]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        o   Then the list of neighbors contained in the Hello Packet is
            examined.  If the router itself appears in this list, the
            neighbor state machine should be executed with the event 2-
            WayReceived.  Otherwise, the neighbor state machine should
            be executed with the event 1-WayReceived, and the processing
            of the packet stops.

        o   Next, the Hello Packet's Router Priority field is examined.
            If this field is different than the one previously received
            from the neighbor, the receiving interface's state machine
            is scheduled with the event NeighborChange.  In any case,
            the Router Priority field in the neighbor data structure
            should be updated accordingly.

        o   Next the Designated Router field in the Hello Packet is
            examined.  If the neighbor is both declaring itself to be
            Designated Router (Designated Router field = Neighbor IP
            address) and the Backup Designated Router field in the
            packet is equal to 0.0.0.0 and the receiving interface is in
            state Waiting, the receiving interface's state machine is
            scheduled with the event BackupSeen.  Otherwise, if the
            neighbor is declaring itself to be Designated Router and it
            had not previously, or the neighbor is not declaring itself
            Designated Router where it had previously, the receiving
            interface's state machine is scheduled with the event
            NeighborChange.  In any case, the Neighbors' Designated
            Router item in the neighbor structure is updated
            accordingly.

        o   Finally, the Backup Designated Router field in the Hello
            Packet is examined.  If the neighbor is declaring itself to
            be Backup Designated Router (Backup Designated Router field
            = Neighbor IP address) and the receiving interface is in
            state Waiting, the receiving interface's state machine is
            scheduled with the event BackupSeen.  Otherwise, if the
            neighbor is declaring itself to be Backup Designated Router
            and it had not previously, or the neighbor is not declaring
            itself Backup Designated Router where it had previously, the
            receiving interface's state machine is scheduled with the
            event NeighborChange.  In any case, the Neighbor's Backup
            Designated Router item in the neighbor structure is updated
            accordingly.

        On non-broadcast multi-access networks, receipt of an Hello
        Packet may also cause an Hello Packet to be sent back to the
        neighbor in response. See Section 9.5.1 for more details.





Moy                                                            [Page 85]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    10.6.  Receiving Database Description Packets

        This section explains the detailed processing of a received
        Database Description Packet.  The incoming Database Description
        Packet has already been associated with a neighbor and receiving
        interface by the generic input packet processing (Section 8.2).
        The further processing of the Database Description Packet
        depends on the neighbor state.  If the neighbor's state is Down
        or Attempt the packet should be ignored.  Otherwise, if the
        state is:


        Init
            The neighbor state machine should be executed with the event
            2-WayReceived.  This causes an immediate state change to
            either state 2-Way or state ExStart. If the new state is
            ExStart, the processing of the current packet should then
            continue in this new state by falling through to case
            ExStart below.

        2-Way
            The packet should be ignored.  Database Description Packets
            are used only for the purpose of bringing up adjacencies.[7]

        ExStart
            If the received packet matches one of the following cases,
            then the neighbor state machine should be executed with the
            event NegotiationDone (causing the state to transition to
            Exchange), the packet's Options field should be recorded in
            the neighbor structure's Neighbor Options field and the
            packet should be accepted as next in sequence and processed
            further (see below).  Otherwise, the packet should be
            ignored.

            o   The initialize(I), more (M) and master(MS) bits are set,
                the contents of the packet are empty, and the neighbor's
                Router ID is larger than the router's own.  In this case
                the router is now Slave.  Set the master/slave bit to
                slave, and set the DD sequence number to that specified
                by the master.

            o   The initialize(I) and master(MS) bits are off, the
                packet's DD sequence number equals the router's own DD
                sequence number (indicating acknowledgment) and the
                neighbor's Router ID is smaller than the router's own.
                In this case the router is Master.





Moy                                                            [Page 86]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        Exchange
            If the state of the MS-bit is inconsistent with the
            master/slave state of the connection, generate the neighbor
            event SeqNumberMismatch and stop processing the packet.
            Otherwise:

            o   If the initialize(I) bit is set, generate the neighbor
                event SeqNumberMismatch and stop processing the packet.

            o   If the packet's Options field indicates a different set
                of optional OSPF capabilities than were previously
                received from the neighbor (recorded in the Neighbor
                Options field of the neighbor structure), generate the
                neighbor event SeqNumberMismatch and stop processing the
                packet.

            o   If the router is master, and the packet's DD sequence
                number equals the router's own DD sequence number (this
                packet is the next in sequence) the packet should be
                accepted and its contents processed (below).

            o   If the router is master, and the packet's DD sequence
                number is one less than the router's DD sequence number,
                the packet is a duplicate.  Duplicates should be
                discarded by the master.

            o   If the router is slave, and the packet's DD sequence
                number is one more than the router's own DD sequence
                number (this packet is the next in sequence) the packet
                should be accepted and its contents processed (below).

            o   If the router is slave, and the packet's DD sequence
                number is equal to the router's DD sequence number, the
                packet is a duplicate.  The slave must respond to
                duplicates by repeating the last Database Description
                packet that it had sent.

            o   Else, generate the neighbor event SeqNumberMismatch and
                stop processing the packet.

        Loading or Full
            In this state, the router has sent and received an entire
            sequence of Database Description Packets.  The only packets
            received should be duplicates (see above).  In particular,
            the packet's Options field should match the set of optional
            OSPF capabilities previously indicated by the neighbor
            (stored in the neighbor structure's Neighbor Options field).
            Any other packets received, including the reception of a



Moy                                                            [Page 87]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            packet with the Initialize(I) bit set, should generate the
            neighbor event SeqNumberMismatch.[8] Duplicates should be
            discarded by the master.  The slave must respond to
            duplicates by repeating the last Database Description packet
            that it had sent.


        When the router accepts a received Database Description Packet
        as the next in sequence the packet contents are processed as
        follows.  For each link state advertisement listed, the
        advertisement's LS type is checked for validity.  If the LS type
        is unknown (e.g., not one of the LS types 1-5 defined by this
        specification), or if this is a AS external advertisement (LS
        type = 5) and the neighbor is associated with a stub area,
        generate the neighbor event SeqNumberMismatch and stop
        processing the packet.  Otherwise, the router looks up the
        advertisement in its database to see whether it also has an
        instance of the link state advertisement.  If it does not, or if
        the database copy is less recent (see Section 13.1), the link
        state advertisement is put on the Link state request list so
        that it can be requested (immediately or at some later time) in
        Link State Request Packets.

        When the router accepts a received Database Description Packet
        as the next in sequence, it also performs the following actions,
        depending on whether it is master or slave:


        Master
            Increments the DD sequence number.  If the router has
            already sent its entire sequence of Database Description
            Packets, and the just accepted packet has the more bit (M)
            set to 0, the neighbor event ExchangeDone is generated.
            Otherwise, it should send a new Database Description to the
            slave.

        Slave
            Sets the DD sequence number to the DD sequence number
            appearing in the received packet.  The slave must send a
            Database Description Packet in reply.  If the received
            packet has the more bit (M) set to 0, and the packet to be
            sent by the slave will also have the M-bit set to 0, the
            neighbor event ExchangeDone is generated.  Note that the
            slave always generates this event before the master.







Moy                                                            [Page 88]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    10.7.  Receiving Link State Request Packets

        This section explains the detailed processing of received Link
        State Request packets.  Received Link State Request Packets
        specify a list of link state advertisements that the neighbor
        wishes to receive.  Link State Request Packets should be
        accepted when the neighbor is in states Exchange, Loading, or
        Full.  In all other states Link State Request Packets should be
        ignored.

        Each link state advertisement specified in the Link State
        Request packet should be located in the router's database, and
        copied into Link State Update packets for transmission to the
        neighbor.  These link state advertisements should NOT be placed
        on the Link state retransmission list for the neighbor.  If a
        link state advertisement cannot be found in the database,
        something has gone wrong with the Database Exchange process, and
        neighbor event BadLSReq should be generated.


    10.8.  Sending Database Description Packets

        This section describes how Database Description Packets are sent
        to a neighbor.  The router's optional OSPF capabilities (see
        Section 4.5) are transmitted to the neighbor in the Options
        field of the Database Description packet.  The router should
        maintain the same set of optional capabilities throughout the
        Database Exchange and flooding procedures.  If for some reason
        the router's optional capabilities change, the Database Exchange
        procedure should be restarted by reverting to neighbor state
        ExStart.  There are currently two optional capabilities defined.
        The T-bit should be set if and only if the router is capable of
        calculating separate routes for each IP TOS.  The E-bit should
        be set if and only if the attached network belongs to a non-stub
        area.  The rest of the Options field should be set to zero.

        The sending of Database Description packets depends on the
        neighbor's state.  In state ExStart the router sends empty
        Database Description packets, with the initialize (I), more (M)
        and master (MS) bits set.  These packets are retransmitted every
        RxmtInterval seconds.

        In state Exchange the Database Description Packets actually
        contain summaries of the link state information contained in the
        router's database.  Each link state advertisement in the area's
        topological database (at the time the neighbor transitions into
        Exchange state) is listed in the neighbor Database summary list.
        When a new Database Description Packet is to be sent, the



Moy                                                            [Page 89]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        packet's DD sequence number is incremented, and the (new) top of
        the Database summary list is described by the packet.  Items are
        removed from the Database summary list when the previous packet
        is acknowledged.

        In state Exchange, the determination of when to send a Database
        Description packet depends on whether the router is master or
        slave:


        Master
            Database Description packets are sent when either a) the
            slave acknowledges the previous Database Description packet
            by echoing the DD sequence number or b) RxmtInterval seconds
            elapse without an acknowledgment, in which case the previous
            Database Description packet is retransmitted.

        Slave
            Database Description packets are sent only in response to
            Database Description packets received from the master.  If
            the Database Description packet received from the master is
            new, a new Database Description packet is sent, otherwise
            the previous Database Description packet is resent.


        In states Loading and Full the slave must resend its last
        Database Description packet in response to duplicate Database
        Description packets received from the master.  For this reason
        the slave must wait RouterDeadInterval seconds before freeing
        the last Database Description packet.  Reception of a Database
        Description packet from the master after this interval will
        generate a SeqNumberMismatch neighbor event.


    10.9.  Sending Link State Request Packets

        In neighbor states Exchange or Loading, the Link state request
        list contains a list of those link state advertisements that
        need to be obtained from the neighbor.  To request these
        advertisements, a router sends the neighbor the beginning of the
        Link state request list, packaged in a Link State Request
        packet.

        When the neighbor responds to these requests with the proper
        Link State Update packet(s), the Link state request list is
        truncated and a new Link State Request packet is sent.  This
        process continues until the Link state request list becomes
        empty.  Unsatisfied Link State Request packets are retransmitted



Moy                                                            [Page 90]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        at intervals of RxmtInterval.  There should be at most one Link
        State Request packet outstanding at any one time.

        When the Link state request list becomes empty, and the neighbor
        state is Loading (i.e., a complete sequence of Database
        Description packets has been sent to and received from the
        neighbor), the Loading Done neighbor event is generated.


    10.10.  An Example

        Figure 14 shows an example of an adjacency forming.  Routers RT1
        and RT2 are both connected to a broadcast network.  It is
        assumed that RT2 is the Designated Router for the network, and
        that RT2 has a higher Router ID than Router RT1.

        The neighbor state changes realized by each router are listed on
        the sides of the figure.

        At the beginning of Figure 14, Router RT1's interface to the
        network becomes operational.  It begins sending Hello Packets,
        although it doesn't know the identity of the Designated Router
        or of any other neighboring routers.  Router RT2 hears this
        hello (moving the neighbor to Init state), and in its next Hello
        Packet indicates that it is itself the Designated Router and
        that it has heard Hello Packets from RT1.  This in turn causes
        RT1 to go to state ExStart, as it starts to bring up the
        adjacency.

        RT1 begins by asserting itself as the master.  When it sees that
        RT2 is indeed the master (because of RT2's higher Router ID),
        RT1 transitions to slave state and adopts its neighbor's DD
        sequence number.  Database Description packets are then
        exchanged, with polls coming from the master (RT2) and responses
        from the slave (RT1).  This sequence of Database Description
        Packets ends when both the poll and associated response has the
        M-bit off.

        In this example, it is assumed that RT2 has a completely up to
        date database.  In that case, RT2 goes immediately into Full
        state.  RT1 will go into Full state after updating the necessary
        parts of its database.  This is done by sending Link State
        Request Packets, and receiving Link State Update Packets in
        response.  Note that, while RT1 has waited until a complete set
        of Database Description Packets has been received (from RT2)
        before sending any Link State Request Packets, this need not be
        the case.  RT1 could have interleaved the sending of Link State
        Request Packets with the reception of Database Description



Moy                                                            [Page 91]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994







            +---+                                         +---+
            |RT1|                                         |RT2|
            +---+                                         +---+

            Down                                          Down
                            Hello(DR=0,seen=0)
                       ------------------------------>
                         Hello (DR=RT2,seen=RT1,...)      Init
                       <------------------------------
            ExStart        D-D (Seq=x,I,M,Master)
                       ------------------------------>
                           D-D (Seq=y,I,M,Master)         ExStart
                       <------------------------------
            Exchange       D-D (Seq=y,M,Slave)
                       ------------------------------>
                           D-D (Seq=y+1,M,Master)         Exchange
                       <------------------------------
                           D-D (Seq=y+1,M,Slave)
                       ------------------------------>
                                     ...
                                     ...
                                     ...
                           D-D (Seq=y+n, Master)
                       <------------------------------
                           D-D (Seq=y+n, Slave)
             Loading   ------------------------------>
                                 LS Request                Full
                       ------------------------------>
                                 LS Update
                       <------------------------------
                                 LS Request
                       ------------------------------>
                                 LS Update
                       <------------------------------
             Full


                   Figure 14: An adjacency bring-up example








Moy                                                            [Page 92]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        Packets.


11.  The Routing Table Structure

    The routing table data structure contains all the information
    necessary to forward an IP data packet toward its destination.  Each
    routing table entry describes the collection of best paths to a
    particular destination.  When forwarding an IP data packet, the
    routing table entry providing the best match for the packet's IP
    destination is located.  The matching routing table entry then
    provides the next hop towards the packet's destination.  OSPF also
    provides for the existence of a default route (Destination ID =
    DefaultDestination, Address Mask =  0x00000000).  When the default
    route exists, it matches all IP destinations (although any other
    matching entry is a better match).  Finding the routing table entry
    that best matches an IP destination is further described in Section
    11.1.

    There is a single routing table in each router.  Two sample routing
    tables are described in Sections 11.2 and 11.3.  The building of the
    routing table is discussed in Section 16.

    The rest of this section defines the fields found in a routing table
    entry.  The first set of fields describes the routing table entry's
    destination.


    Destination Type
        The destination can be one of three types.  Only the first type,
        Network, is actually used when forwarding IP data traffic.  The
        other destinations are used solely as intermediate steps in the
        routing table build process.

        Network
            A range of IP addresses, to which IP data traffic may be
            forwarded.  This includes IP networks (class A, B, or C), IP
            subnets, IP supernets and single IP hosts.  The default
            route also falls in this category.

        Area border router
            Routers that are connected to multiple OSPF areas.  Such
            routers originate summary link advertisements.  These
            routing table entries are used when calculating the inter-
            area routes (see Section 16.2).  These routing table entries
            may also be associated with configured virtual links.





Moy                                                            [Page 93]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        AS boundary router
            Routers that originate AS external link advertisements.
            These routing table entries are used when calculating the AS
            external routes (see Section 16.4).

    Destination ID
        The destination's identifier or name.  This depends on the
        Destination Type.  For networks, the identifier is their
        associated IP address.  For all other types, the identifier is
        the OSPF Router ID.[9]

    Address Mask
        Only defined for networks.  The network's IP address together
        with its address mask defines a range of IP addresses.  For IP
        subnets, the address mask is referred to as the subnet mask.
        For host routes, the mask is "all ones" (0xffffffff).

    Optional Capabilities
        When the destination is a router (either an area border router
        or an AS boundary router) this field indicates the optional OSPF
        capabilities supported by the destination router.  The two
        optional capabilities currently defined by this specification
        are the ability to route based on IP TOS and the ability to
        process AS external link advertisements.  For a further
        discussion of OSPF's optional capabilities, see Section 4.5.


    The set of paths to use for a destination may vary based on IP Type
    of Service and the OSPF area to which the paths belong.  This means
    that there may be multiple routing table entries for the same
    destination, depending on the values of the next two fields.


    Type of Service
        There can be a separate set of routes for each IP Type of
        Service.  The encoding of TOS in OSPF link state advertisements
        is described in Section 12.3.

    Area
        This field indicates the area whose link state information has
        led to the routing table entry's collection of paths.  This is
        called the entry's associated area.  For sets of AS external
        paths, this field is not defined.  For destinations of type
        "area border router", there may be separate sets of paths (and
        therefore separate routing table entries) associated with each
        of several areas.  This will happen when two area border routers
        share multiple areas in common.  For all other destination
        types, only the set of paths associated with the best area (the



Moy                                                            [Page 94]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        one providing the shortest route) is kept.


    The rest of the routing table entry describes the set of paths to
    the destination.  The following fields pertain to the set of paths
    as a whole.  In other words, each one of the paths contained in a
    routing table entry is of the same path-type and cost (see below).


    Path-type
        There are four possible types of paths used to route traffic to
        the destination, listed here in order of preference: intra-area,
        inter-area, type 1 external or type 2 external.  Intra-area
        paths indicate destinations belonging to one of the router's
        attached areas.  Inter-area paths are paths to destinations in
        other OSPF areas.  These are discovered through the examination
        of received summary link advertisements.  AS external paths are
        paths to destinations external to the AS.  These are detected
        through the examination of received AS external link
        advertisements.

    Cost
        The link state cost of the path to the destination.  For all
        paths except type 2 external paths this describes the entire
        path's cost.  For Type 2 external paths, this field describes
        the cost of the portion of the path internal to the AS.  This
        cost is calculated as the sum of the costs of the path's
        constituent links.

    Type 2 cost
        Only valid for type 2 external paths.  For these paths, this
        field indicates the cost of the path's external portion.  This
        cost has been advertised by an AS boundary router, and is the
        most significant part of the total path cost.  For example, a
        type 2 external path with type 2 cost of 5 is always preferred
        over a path with type 2 cost of 10, regardless of the cost of
        the two paths' internal components.

    Link State Origin
        Valid only for intra-area paths, this field indicates the link
        state advertisement (router links or network links) that
        directly references the destination.  For example, if the
        destination is a transit network, this is the transit network's
        network links advertisement.  If the destination is a stub
        network, this is the router links advertisement for the attached
        router.  The advertisement is discovered during the shortest-
        path tree calculation (see Section 16.1).  Multiple
        advertisements may reference the destination, however a tie-



Moy                                                            [Page 95]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        breaking scheme always reduces the choice to a single
        advertisement. The Link State Origin field is not used by the
        OSPF protocol, but it is used by the routing table calculation
        in OSPF's Multicast routing extensions (MOSPF).

    When multiple paths of equal path-type and cost exist to a
    destination (called elsewhere "equal-cost" paths), they are stored
    in a single routing table entry.  Each one of the "equal-cost" paths
    is distinguished by the following fields:


    Next hop
        The outgoing router interface to use when forwarding traffic to
        the destination.  On multi-access networks, the next hop also
        includes the IP address of the next router (if any) in the path
        towards the destination.  This next router will always be one of
        the adjacent neighbors.

    Advertising router
        Valid only for inter-area and AS external paths.  This field
        indicates the Router ID of the router advertising the summary
        link or AS external link that led to this path.


    11.1.  Routing table lookup

        When an IP data packet is received, an OSPF router finds the
        routing table entry that best matches the packet's destination.
        This routing table entry then provides the outgoing interface
        and next hop router to use in forwarding the packet. This
        section describes the process of finding the best matching
        routing table entry. The process consists of a number of steps,
        wherein the collection of routing table entries is progressively
        pruned. In the end, the single routing table entry remaining is
        the called best match.

        Note that the steps described below may fail to produce a best
        match routing table entry (i.e., all existing routing table
        entries are pruned for some reason or another). In this case,
        the packet's IP destination is considered unreachable. Instead
        of being forwarded, the packet should be dropped and an ICMP
        destination unreachable message should be returned to the
        packet's source.


        (1) Select the complete set of "matching" routing table entries
            from the routing table.  Each routing table entry describes
            a (set of) path(s) to a range of IP addresses. If the data



Moy                                                            [Page 96]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            packet's IP destination falls into an entry's range of IP
            addresses, the routing table entry is called a match. (It is
            quite likely that multiple entries will match the data
            packet.  For example, a default route will match all
            packets.)

        (2) Suppose that the packet's IP destination falls into one of
            the router's configured area address ranges (see Section
            3.5), and that the particular area address range is active.
            This means that there are one or more reachable (by intra-
            area paths) networks contained in the area address range.
            The packet's IP destination is then required to belong to
            one of these constituent networks. For this reason, only
            matching routing table entries with path-type of intra-area
            are considered (all others are pruned). If no such matching
            entries exist, the destination is unreachable (see above).
            Otherwise, skip to step 4.

        (3) Reduce the set of matching entries to those having the most
            preferential path-type (see Section 11). OSPF has a four
            level hierarchy of paths. Intra-area paths are the most
            preferred, followed in order by inter-area, type 1 external
            and type 2 external paths.

        (4) Select the remaining routing table entry that provides the
            longest (most specific) match. Another way of saying this is
            to choose the remaining entry that specifies the narrowest
            range of IP addresses.[10] For example, the entry for the
            address/mask pair of (128.185.1.0, 0xffffff00) is more
            specific than an entry for the pair (128.185.0.0,
            0xffff0000). The default route is the least specific match,
            since it matches all destinations.

        (5) At this point, there may still be multiple routing table
            entries remaining. Each routing entry will specify the same
            range of IP addresses, but a different IP Type of Service.
            Select the routing table entry whose TOS value matches the
            TOS found in the packet header. If there is no routing table
            entry for this TOS, select the routing table entry for TOS
            0. In other words, packets requesting TOS X are routed along
            the TOS 0 path if a TOS X path does not exist.


    11.2.  Sample routing table, without areas

        Consider the Autonomous System pictured in Figure 2.  No OSPF
        areas have been configured.  A single metric is shown per
        outbound interface, indicating that routes will not vary based



Moy                                                            [Page 97]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        on TOS.  The calculation of Router RT6's routing table proceeds
        as described in Section 2.1.  The resulting routing table is
        shown in Table 12.  Destination types are abbreviated: Network
        as "N", area border router as "BR" and AS boundary router as
        "ASBR".

        There are no instances of multiple equal-cost shortest paths in
        this example.  Also, since there are no areas, there are no
        inter-area paths.

        Routers RT5 and RT7 are AS boundary routers.  Intra-area routes
        have been calculated to Routers RT5 and RT7.  This allows
        external routes to be calculated to the destinations advertised
        by RT5 and RT7 (i.e., Networks N12, N13, N14 and N15).  It is
        assumed all AS external advertisements originated by RT5 and RT7
        are advertising type 1 external metrics.  This results in type 1
        external paths being calculated to destinations N12-N15.



    11.3.  Sample routing table, with areas

        Consider the previous example, this time split into OSPF areas.
        An OSPF area configuration is pictured in Figure 6.  Router
        RT4's routing table will be described for this area
        configuration.  Router RT4 has a connection to Area 1 and a
        backbone connection.  This causes Router RT4 to view the AS as
        the concatenation of the two graphs shown in Figures 7 and 8.
        The resulting routing table is displayed in Table 13.

        Again, Routers RT5 and RT7 are AS boundary routers.  Routers
        RT3, RT4, RT7, RT10 and RT11 are area border routers.  Note that
        there are two routing table entries (in this case having
        identical paths) for Router RT7, in its dual capacities as an
        area border router and an AS boundary router.  Note also that
        there are two routing entries for the area border router RT3,
        since it has two areas in common with RT4 (Area 1 and the
        backbone).

        Backbone paths have been calculated to all area border routers
        (BR).  These are used when determining the inter-area routes.
        Note that all of the inter-area routes are associated with the
        backbone; this is always the case when the calculating router is
        itself an area border router.  Routing information is condensed
        at area boundaries.  In this example, we assume that Area 3 has
        been defined so that networks N9-N11 and the host route to H1
        are all condensed to a single route when advertised into the
        backbone (by Router RT11).  Note that the cost of this route is



Moy                                                            [Page 98]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994




      Type   Dest   Area   Path  Type    Cost   Next     Adv.
                                                Hop(s)   Router(s)
      ____________________________________________________________
      N      N1     0      intra-area    10     RT3      *
      N      N2     0      intra-area    10     RT3      *
      N      N3     0      intra-area    7      RT3      *
      N      N4     0      intra-area    8      RT3      *
      N      Ib     0      intra-area    7      *        *
      N      Ia     0      intra-area    12     RT10     *
      N      N6     0      intra-area    8      RT10     *
      N      N7     0      intra-area    12     RT10     *
      N      N8     0      intra-area    10     RT10     *
      N      N9     0      intra-area    11     RT10     *
      N      N10    0      intra-area    13     RT10     *
      N      N11    0      intra-area    14     RT10     *
      N      H1     0      intra-area    21     RT10     *
      ASBR   RT5    0      intra-area    6      RT5      *
      ASBR   RT7    0      intra-area    8      RT10     *
      ____________________________________________________________
      N      N12    *      type 1 ext.   10     RT10     RT7
      N      N13    *      type 1 ext.   14     RT5      RT5
      N      N14    *      type 1 ext.   14     RT5      RT5
      N      N15    *      type 1 ext.   17     RT10     RT7


               Table 12: The routing table for Router RT6
                         (no configured areas).

        the minimum of the set of costs to its individual components.

        There is a virtual link configured between Routers RT10 and
        RT11.  Without this configured virtual link, RT11 would be
        unable to advertise a route for networks N9-N11 and Host H1 into
        the backbone, and there would not be an entry for these networks
        in Router RT4's routing table.

        In this example there are two equal-cost paths to Network N12.
        However, they both use the same next hop (Router RT5).



        Router RT4's routing table would improve (i.e., some of the
        paths in the routing table would become shorter) if an
        additional virtual link were configured between Router RT4 and
        Router RT3.  The new virtual link would itself be associated
        with the first entry for area border router RT3 in Table 13 (an



Moy                                                            [Page 99]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994




   Type   Dest        Area   Path  Type    Cost   Next      Adv.
                                                  Hops(s)   Router(s)
   __________________________________________________________________
   N      N1          1      intra-area    4      RT1       *
   N      N2          1      intra-area    4      RT2       *
   N      N3          1      intra-area    1      *         *
   N      N4          1      intra-area    3      RT3       *
   BR     RT3         1      intra-area    1      *         *
   __________________________________________________________________
   N      Ib          0      intra-area    22     RT5       *
   N      Ia          0      intra-area    27     RT5       *
   BR     RT3         0      intra-area    21     RT5       *
   BR     RT7         0      intra-area    14     RT5       *
   BR     RT10        0      intra-area    22     RT5       *
   BR     RT11        0      intra-area    25     RT5       *
   ASBR   RT5         0      intra-area    8      *         *
   ASBR   RT7         0      intra-area    14     RT5       *
   __________________________________________________________________
   N      N6          0      inter-area    15     RT5       RT7
   N      N7          0      inter-area    19     RT5       RT7
   N      N8          0      inter-area    18     RT5       RT7
   N      N9-N11,H1   0      inter-area    26     RT5       RT11
   __________________________________________________________________
   N      N12         *      type 1 ext.   16     RT5       RT5,RT7
   N      N13         *      type 1 ext.   16     RT5       RT5
   N      N14         *      type 1 ext.   16     RT5       RT5
   N      N15         *      type 1 ext.   23     RT5       RT7


                  Table 13: Router RT4's routing table
                       in the presence of areas.

        intra-area path through Area 1).  This would yield a cost of 1
        for the virtual link.  The routing table entries changes that
        would be caused by the addition of this virtual link are shown
        in Table 14.



12.  Link State Advertisements

    Each router in the Autonomous System originates one or more link
    state advertisements.  There are five distinct types of link state
    advertisements, which are described in Section 4.3.  The collection
    of link state advertisements forms the link state or topological
    database.  Each separate type of advertisement has a separate



Moy                                                           [Page 100]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994




    Type   Dest        Area   Path  Type   Cost   Next     Adv.
                                                  Hop(s)   Router(s)
    ________________________________________________________________
    N      Ib          0      intra-area   16     RT3      *
    N      Ia          0      intra-area   21     RT3      *
    BR     RT3         0      intra-area   1      *        *
    BR     RT10        0      intra-area   16     RT3      *
    BR     RT11        0      intra-area   19     RT3      *
    ________________________________________________________________
    N      N9-N11,H1   0      inter-area   20     RT3      RT11


                  Table 14: Changes resulting from an
                        additional virtual link.

    function.  Router links and network links advertisements describe
    how an area's routers and networks are interconnected.  Summary link
    advertisements provide a way of condensing an area's routing
    information.  AS external advertisements provide a way of
    transparently advertising externally-derived routing information
    throughout the Autonomous System.

    Each link state advertisement begins with a standard 20-byte header.
    This link state advertisement header is discussed below.


    12.1.  The Link State Advertisement Header

        The link state advertisement header contains the LS type, Link
        State ID and Advertising Router fields.  The combination of
        these three fields uniquely identifies the link state
        advertisement.

        There may be several instances of an advertisement present in
        the Autonomous System, all at the same time.  It must then be
        determined which instance is more recent.  This determination is
        made by examining the LS sequence, LS checksum and LS age
        fields.  These fields are also contained in the 20-byte link
        state advertisement header.

        Several of the OSPF packet types list link state advertisements.
        When the instance is not important, an advertisement is referred
        to by its LS type, Link State ID and Advertising Router (see
        Link State Request Packets).  Otherwise, the LS sequence number,
        LS age and LS checksum fields must also be referenced.




Moy                                                           [Page 101]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        A detailed explanation of the fields contained in the link state
        advertisement header follows.


        12.1.1.  LS age

            This field is the age of the link state advertisement in
            seconds.  It should be processed as an unsigned 16-bit
            integer.  It is set to 0 when the link state advertisement
            is originated.  It must be incremented by InfTransDelay on
            every hop of the flooding procedure.  Link state
            advertisements are also aged as they are held in each
            router's database.

            The age of a link state advertisement is never incremented
            past MaxAge.  Advertisements having age MaxAge are not used
            in the routing table calculation.  When an advertisement's
            age first reaches MaxAge, it is reflooded.  A link state
            advertisement of age MaxAge is finally flushed from the
            database when it is no longer needed to ensure database
            synchronization.  For more information on the aging of link
            state advertisements, consult Section 14.

            The LS age field is examined when a router receives two
            instances of a link state advertisement, both having
            identical LS sequence numbers and LS checksums.  An instance
            of age MaxAge is then always accepted as most recent; this
            allows old advertisements to be flushed quickly from the
            routing domain.  Otherwise, if the ages differ by more than
            MaxAgeDiff, the instance having the smaller age is accepted
            as most recent.[11] See Section 13.1 for more details.


        12.1.2.  Options

            The Options field in the link state advertisement header
            indicates which optional capabilities are associated with
            the advertisement.  OSPF's optional capabilities are
            described in Section 4.5.  There are currently two optional
            capabilities defined; they are represented by the T-bit and
            E-bit found in the Options field.  The rest of the Options
            field should be set to zero.

            The E-bit represents OSPF's ExternalRoutingCapability.  This
            bit should be set in all advertisements associated with the
            backbone, and all advertisements associated with non-stub
            areas (see Section 3.6).  It should also be set in all AS
            external link advertisements.  It should be reset in all



Moy                                                           [Page 102]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            router links, network links and summary link advertisements
            associated with a stub area.  For all link state
            advertisements, the setting of the E-bit is for
            informational purposes only; it does not affect the routing
            table calculation.

            The T-bit represents OSPF's TOS routing capability.  This
            bit should be set in a router links advertisement if and
            only if the router is capable of calculating separate routes
            for each IP TOS (see Section 2.4).  The T-bit should always
            be set in network links advertisements.  It should be set in
            summary link and AS external link advertisements if and only
            if the advertisement describes paths for all TOS values,
            instead of just the TOS 0 path.  Note that, with the T-bit
            set, there may still be only a single metric in the
            advertisement (the TOS 0 metric).  This would mean that
            paths for non-zero TOS exist, but are equivalent to the TOS
            0 path.  A link state advertisement's T-bit is examined when
            calculating the routing table's non-zero TOS paths (see
            Section 16.9).


        12.1.3.  LS type

            The LS type field dictates the format and function of the
            link state advertisement.  Advertisements of different types
            have different names (e.g., router links or network links).
            All advertisement types, except the AS external link
            advertisements (LS type = 5), are flooded throughout a
            single area only.  AS external link advertisements are
            flooded throughout the entire Autonomous System, excepting
            stub areas (see Section 3.6).  Each separate advertisement
            type is briefly described below in Table 15.

        12.1.4.  Link State ID

            This field identifies the piece of the routing domain that
            is being described by the advertisement.  Depending on the
            advertisement's LS type, the Link State ID takes on the
            values listed in Table 16.


            Actually, for Type 3 summary link (LS type = 3)
            advertisements and AS external link (LS type = 5)
            advertisements, the Link State ID may additionally have one
            or more of the destination network's "host" bits set. For
            example, when originating an AS external link for the
            network 10.0.0.0 with mask of 255.0.0.0, the Link State ID



Moy                                                           [Page 103]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994




           LS Type   Advertisement description
           __________________________________________________
           1         These are the router links
                     advertisements. They describe the
                     collected states of the router's
                     interfaces. For more information,
                     consult Section 12.4.1.
           __________________________________________________
           2         These are the network links
                     advertisements. They describe the set
                     of routers attached to the network. For
                     more information, consult
                     Section 12.4.2.
           __________________________________________________
           3 or 4    These are the summary link
                     advertisements. They describe
                     inter-area routes, and enable the
                     condensation of routing information at
                     area borders. Originated by area border
                     routers, the Type 3 advertisements
                     describe routes to networks while the
                     Type 4 advertisements describe routes to
                     AS boundary routers.
           __________________________________________________
           5         These are the AS external link
                     advertisements. Originated by AS
                     boundary routers, they describe routes
                     to destinations external to the
                     Autonomous System. A default route for
                     the Autonomous System can also be
                     described by an AS external link
                     advertisement.


               Table 15: OSPF link state advertisements.














Moy                                                           [Page 104]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            LS Type   Link State ID
            _______________________________________________
            1         The originating router's Router ID.
            2         The IP interface address of the
                      network's Designated Router.
            3         The destination network's IP address.
            4         The Router ID of the described AS
                      boundary router.
            5         The destination network's IP address.


              Table 16: The advertisement's Link State ID.

            can be set to anything in the range 10.0.0.0 through
            10.255.255.255 inclusive (although 10.0.0.0 should be used
            whenever possible). The freedom to set certain host bits
            allows a router to originate separate advertisements for two
            networks having the same address but different masks. See
            Appendix F for details.

            When the link state advertisement is describing a network
            (LS type = 2, 3 or 5), the network's IP address is easily
            derived by masking the Link State ID with the network/subnet
            mask contained in the body of the link state advertisement.
            When the link state advertisement is describing a router (LS
            type = 1 or 4), the Link State ID is always the described
            router's OSPF Router ID.

            When an AS external advertisement (LS Type = 5) is
            describing a default route, its Link State ID is set to
            DefaultDestination (0.0.0.0).


        12.1.5.  Advertising Router

            This field specifies the OSPF Router ID of the
            advertisement's originator.  For router links
            advertisements, this field is identical to the Link State ID
            field.  Network link advertisements are originated by the
            network's Designated Router.  Summary link advertisements
            are originated by area border routers.  AS external link
            advertisements are originated by AS boundary routers.


        12.1.6.  LS sequence number

            The sequence number field is a signed 32-bit integer.  It is
            used to detect old and duplicate link state advertisements.



Moy                                                           [Page 105]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            The space of sequence numbers is linearly ordered.  The
            larger the sequence number (when compared as signed 32-bit
            integers) the more recent the advertisement.  To describe to
            sequence number space more precisely, let N refer in the
            discussion below to the constant 2**31.

            The sequence number -N (0x80000000) is reserved (and
            unused).  This leaves -N + 1 (0x80000001) as the smallest
            (and therefore oldest) sequence number.  A router uses this
            sequence number the first time it originates any link state
            advertisement.  Afterwards, the advertisement's sequence
            number is incremented each time the router originates a new
            instance of the advertisement.  When an attempt is made to
            increment the sequence number past the maximum value of N -
            1 (0x7fffffff), the current instance of the advertisement
            must first be flushed from the routing domain.  This is done
            by prematurely aging the advertisement (see Section 14.1)
            and reflooding it.  As soon as this flood has been
            acknowledged by all adjacent neighbors, a new instance can
            be originated with sequence number of -N + 1 (0x80000001).

            The router may be forced to promote the sequence number of
            one of its advertisements when a more recent instance of the
            advertisement is unexpectedly received during the flooding
            process.  This should be a rare event.  This may indicate
            that an out-of-date advertisement, originated by the router
            itself before its last restart/reload, still exists in the
            Autonomous System.  For more information see Section 13.4.


        12.1.7.  LS checksum

            This field is the checksum of the complete contents of the
            advertisement, excepting the LS age field.  The LS age field
            is excepted so that an advertisement's age can be
            incremented without updating the checksum.  The checksum
            used is the same that is used for ISO connectionless
            datagrams; it is commonly referred to as the Fletcher
            checksum.  It is documented in Annex B of [RFC 905].  The
            link state advertisement header also contains the length of
            the advertisement in bytes; subtracting the size of the LS
            age field (two bytes) yields the amount of data to checksum.

            The checksum is used to detect data corruption of an
            advertisement.  This corruption can occur while an
            advertisement is being flooded, or while it is being held in
            a router's memory.  The LS checksum field cannot take on the
            value of zero; the occurrence of such a value should be



Moy                                                           [Page 106]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            considered a checksum failure.  In other words, calculation
            of the checksum is not optional.

            The checksum of a link state advertisement is verified in
            two cases: a) when it is received in a Link State Update
            Packet and b) at times during the aging of the link state
            database.  The detection of a checksum failure leads to
            separate actions in each case.  See Sections 13 and 14 for
            more details.

            Whenever the LS sequence number field indicates that two
            instances of an advertisement are the same, the LS checksum
            field is examined.  If there is a difference, the instance
            with the larger LS checksum is considered to be most
            recent.[12] See Section 13.1 for more details.


    12.2.  The link state database

        A router has a separate link state database for every area to
        which it belongs.  The link state database has been referred to
        elsewhere in the text as the topological database.  All routers
        belonging to the same area have identical topological databases
        for the area.

        The databases for each individual area are always dealt with
        separately.  The shortest path calculation is performed
        separately for each area (see Section 16).  Components of the
        area topological database are flooded throughout the area only.
        Finally, when an adjacency (belonging to Area A) is being
        brought up, only the database for Area A is synchronized between
        the two routers.

        The area database is composed of router links advertisements,
        network links advertisements, and summary link advertisements
        (all listed in the area data structure).  In addition, external
        routes (AS external advertisements) are included in all non-stub
        area databases (see Section 3.6).

        An implementation of OSPF must be able to access individual
        pieces of an area database.  This lookup function is based on an
        advertisement's LS type, Link State ID and Advertising
        Router.[13] There will be a single instance (the most up-to-
        date) of each link state advertisement in the database.  The
        database lookup function is invoked during the link state
        flooding procedure (Section 13) and the routing table
        calculation (Section 16).  In addition, using this lookup
        function the router can determine whether it has itself ever



Moy                                                           [Page 107]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        originated a particular link state advertisement, and if so,
        with what LS sequence number.

        A link state advertisement is added to a router's database when
        either a) it is received during the flooding process (Section
        13) or b) it is originated by the router itself (Section 12.4).
        A link state advertisement is deleted from a router's database
        when either a) it has been overwritten by a newer instance
        during the flooding process (Section 13) or b) the router
        originates a newer instance of one of its self-originated
        advertisements (Section 12.4) or c) the advertisement ages out
        and is flushed from the routing domain (Section 14).  Whenever a
        link state advertisement is deleted from the database it must
        also be removed from all neighbors' Link state retransmission
        lists (see Section 10).


    12.3.  Representation of TOS

        All OSPF link state advertisements (with the exception of
        network links advertisements) specify metrics.  In router links
        advertisements, the metrics indicate the costs of the described
        interfaces.  In summary link and AS external link
        advertisements, the metric indicates the cost of the described
        path.  In all of these advertisements, a separate metric can be
        specified for each IP TOS.  The encoding of TOS in OSPF link
        state advertisements is specified in Table 17. That table
        relates the OSPF encoding to the IP packet header's TOS field
        (defined in [RFC 1349]).  The OSPF encoding is expressed as a
        decimal integer, and the IP packet header's TOS field is
        expressed in the binary TOS values used in [RFC 1349].




















Moy                                                           [Page 108]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994



                    OSPF encoding   RFC 1349 TOS values
                    ___________________________________________
                    0               0000 normal service
                    2               0001 minimize monetary cost
                    4               0010 maximize reliability
                    6               0011
                    8               0100 maximize throughput
                    10              0101
                    12              0110
                    14              0111
                    16              1000 minimize delay
                    18              1001
                    20              1010
                    22              1011
                    24              1100
                    26              1101
                    28              1110
                    30              1111


                        Table 17: Representing TOS in OSPF.


        Each OSPF link state advertisement must specify the TOS 0
        metric.  Other TOS metrics, if they appear, must appear in order
        of increasing TOS encoding.  For example, the TOS 8 (maximize
        throughput) metric must always appear before the TOS 16
        (minimize delay) metric when both are specified.  If a metric
        for some non-zero TOS is not specified, its cost defaults to the
        cost for TOS 0, unless the T-bit is reset in the advertisement's
        Options field (see Section 12.1.2 for more details).


    12.4.  Originating link state advertisements

        Into any given OSPF area, a router will originate several link
        state advertisements.  Each router originates a router links
        advertisement.  If the router is also the Designated Router for
        any of the area's networks, it will originate network links
        advertisements for those networks.

        Area border routers originate a single summary link
        advertisement for each known inter-area destination.  AS
        boundary routers originate a single AS external link
        advertisement for each known AS external destination.
        Destinations are advertised one at a time so that the change in
        any single route can be flooded without reflooding the entire



Moy                                                           [Page 109]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        collection of routes.  During the flooding procedure, many link
        state advertisements can be carried by a single Link State
        Update packet.

        As an example, consider Router RT4 in Figure 6.  It is an area
        border router, having a connection to Area 1 and the backbone.
        Router RT4 originates 5 distinct link state advertisements into
        the backbone (one router links, and one summary link for each of
        the networks N1-N4).  Router RT4 will also originate 8 distinct
        link state advertisements into Area 1 (one router links and
        seven summary link advertisements as pictured in Figure 7).  If
        RT4 has been selected as Designated Router for Network N3, it
        will also originate a network links advertisement for N3 into
        Area 1.

        In this same figure, Router RT5 will be originating 3 distinct
        AS external link advertisements (one for each of the networks
        N12-N14).  These will be flooded throughout the entire AS,
        assuming that none of the areas have been configured as stubs.
        However, if area 3 has been configured as a stub area, the
        external advertisements for networks N12-N14 will not be flooded
        into area 3 (see Section 3.6).  Instead, Router RT11 would
        originate a default summary link advertisement that would be
        flooded throughout area 3 (see Section 12.4.3).  This instructs
        all of area 3's internal routers to send their AS external
        traffic to RT11.

        Whenever a new instance of a link state advertisement is
        originated, its LS sequence number is incremented, its LS age is
        set to 0, its LS checksum is calculated, and the advertisement
        is added to the link state database and flooded out the
        appropriate interfaces.  See Section 13.2 for details concerning
        the installation of the advertisement into the link state
        database.  See Section 13.3 for details concerning the flooding
        of newly originated advertisements.


        The ten events that can cause a new instance of a link state
        advertisement to be originated are:


        (1) The LS age field of one of the router's self-originated
            advertisements reaches the value LSRefreshTime. In this
            case, a new instance of the link state advertisement is
            originated, even though the contents of the advertisement
            (apart from the link state advertisement header) will be the
            same.  This guarantees periodic originations of all link
            state advertisements. This periodic updating of link state



Moy                                                           [Page 110]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            advertisements adds robustness to the link state algorithm.
            Link state advertisements that solely describe unreachable
            destinations should not be refreshed, but should instead be
            flushed from the routing domain (see Section 14.1).


        When whatever is being described by a link state advertisement
        changes, a new advertisement is originated.  However, two
        instances of the same link state advertisement may not be
        originated within the time period MinLSInterval.  This may
        require that the generation of the next instance be delayed by
        up to MinLSInterval.  The following events may cause the
        contents of a link state advertisement to change.  These events
        should cause new originations if and only if the contents of the
        new advertisement would be different:


        (2) An interface's state changes (see Section 9.1).  This may
            mean that it is necessary to produce a new instance of the
            router links advertisement.

        (3) An attached network's Designated Router changes.  A new
            router links advertisement should be originated.  Also, if
            the router itself is now the Designated Router, a new
            network links advertisement should be produced.  If the
            router itself is no longer the Designated Router, any
            network links advertisement that it might have originated
            for the network should be flushed from the routing domain
            (see Section 14.1).

        (4) One of the neighboring routers changes to/from the FULL
            state.  This may mean that it is necessary to produce a new
            instance of the router links advertisement.  Also, if the
            router is itself the Designated Router for the attached
            network, a new network links advertisement should be
            produced.


        The next four events concern area border routers only:


        (5) An intra-area route has been added/deleted/modified in the
            routing table.  This may cause a new instance of a summary
            links advertisement (for this route) to be originated in
            each attached area (possibly including the backbone).

        (6) An inter-area route has been added/deleted/modified in the
            routing table.  This may cause a new instance of a summary



Moy                                                           [Page 111]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            links advertisement (for this route) to be originated in
            each attached area (but NEVER for the backbone).

        (7) The router becomes newly attached to an area.  The router
            must then originate summary link advertisements into the
            newly attached area for all pertinent intra-area and inter-
            area routes in the router's routing table.  See Section
            12.4.3 for more details.

        (8) When the state of one of the router's configured virtual
            links changes, it may be necessary to originate a new router
            links advertisement into the virtual link's transit area
            (see the discussion of the router links advertisement's bit
            V in Section 12.4.1), as well as originating a new router
            links advertisement into the backbone.


        The last two events concern AS boundary routers (and former AS
        boundary routers) only:


        (9) An external route gained through direct experience with an
            external routing protocol (like EGP) changes.  This will
            cause an AS boundary router to originate a new instance of
            an AS external link advertisement.

        (10)
            A router ceases to be an AS boundary router, perhaps after
            restarting. In this situation the router should flush all AS
            external link advertisements that it had previously
            originated.  These advertisements can be flushed via the
            premature aging procedure specified in Section 14.1.


        The construction of each type of link state advertisement is
        explained in detail below.  In general, these sections describe
        the contents of the advertisement body (i.e., the part coming
        after the 20-byte advertisement header).  For information
        concerning the building of the link state advertisement header,
        see Section 12.1.

        12.4.1.  Router links

            A router originates a router links advertisement for each
            area that it belongs to.  Such an advertisement describes
            the collected states of the router's links to the area.  The
            advertisement is flooded throughout the particular area, and
            no further.



Moy                                                           [Page 112]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994



                  ....................................
                  . 192.1.2                   Area 1 .
                  .     +                            .
                  .     |                            .
                  .     | 3+---+1                    .
                  .  N1 |--|RT1|-----+               .
                  .     |  +---+                    .
                  .     |                _______N3  .
                  .     +               /          .  1+---+
                  .                     * 192.1.1 *------|RT4|
                  .     +               /_______/   .   +---+
                  .     |              /     |       .
                  .     | 3+---+1     /      |       .
                  .  N2 |--|RT2|-----+      1|       .
                  .     |  +---+           +---+8    .         6+---+
                  .     |                  |RT3|----------------|RT6|
                  .     +                  +---+     .          +---+
                  . 192.1.3                  |2      .   18.10.0.6|7
                  .                          |       .            |
                  .                   +------------+ .
                  .                     192.1.4 (N4) .
                  ....................................


                    Figure 15: Area 1 with IP addresses shown

            The format of a router links advertisement is shown in
            Appendix A (Section A.4.2).  The first 20 bytes of the
            advertisement consist of the generic link state
            advertisement header that was discussed in Section 12.1.
            Router links advertisements have LS type = 1.  The router
            indicates whether it is willing to calculate separate routes
            for each IP TOS by setting (or resetting) the T-bit of the
            link state advertisement's Options field.

            A router also indicates whether it is an area border router,
            or an AS boundary router, by setting the appropriate bits
            (bit B and bit E, respectively) in its router links
            advertisements. This enables paths to those types of routers
            to be saved in the routing table, for later processing of
            summary link advertisements and AS external link
            advertisements.  Bit B should be set whenever the router is
            actively attached to two or more areas, even if the router
            is not currently attached to the OSPF backbone area.  Bit E
            should never be set in a router links advertisement for a
            stub area (stub areas cannot contain AS boundary routers).
            In addition, the router sets bit V in its router links



Moy                                                           [Page 113]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            advertisement for Area A if and only if it is the endpoint
            of an active virtual link using Area A as its Transit area.
            This enables the other routers attached to Area A to
            discover whether the area supports any virtual links (i.e.,
            is a transit area).

            The router links advertisement then describes the router's
            working connections (i.e., interfaces or links) to the area.
            Each link is typed according to the kind of attached
            network.  Each link is also labelled with its Link ID.  This
            Link ID gives a name to the entity that is on the other end
            of the link.  Table 18 summarizes the values used for the
            Type and Link ID fields.



                   Link type   Description       Link ID
                   __________________________________________________
                   1           Point-to-point    Neighbor Router ID
                               link
                   2           Link to transit   Interface address of
                               network           Designated Router
                   3           Link to stub      IP network number
                               network
                   4           Virtual link      Neighbor Router ID


                           Table 18: Link descriptions in the
                              router links advertisement.


            In addition, the Link Data field is specified for each link.
            This field gives 32 bits of extra information for the link.
            For links to transit networks, numbered links to routers and
            virtual links, this field specifies the IP interface address
            of the associated router interface (this is needed by the
            routing table calculation, see Section 16.1.1).  For links
            to stub networks, this field specifies the network's IP
            address mask.  For unnumbered point-to-point networks, the
            Link Data field should be set to the unnumbered interface's
            MIB-II [RFC 1213] ifIndex value.

            Finally, the cost of using the link for output (possibly
            specifying a different cost for each Type of Service) is
            specified.  The output cost of a link is configurable.  It
            must always be non-zero.

            To further describe the process of building the list of link



Moy                                                           [Page 114]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            descriptions, suppose a router wishes to build a router
            links advertisement for Area A.  The router examines its
            collection of interface data structures.  For each
            interface, the following steps are taken:


            o   If the attached network does not belong to Area A, no
                links are added to the advertisement, and the next
                interface should be examined.

            o   Else, if the state of the interface is Down, no links
                are added.

            o   Else, if the state of the interface is Point-to-Point,
                then add links according to the following:

                -   If the neighboring router is fully adjacent, add a
                    Type 1 link (point-to-point) if this is an interface
                    to a point-to-point network, or add a Type 4 link
                    (virtual link) if this is a virtual link.  The Link
                    ID should be set to the Router ID of the neighboring
                    router. For virtual links and numbered point-to-
                    point networks, the Link Data should specify the IP
                    interface address. For unnumbered point-to-point
                    networks, the Link Data field should specify the
                    interface's MIB-II [RFC 1213] ifIndex value.

                -   If this is a numbered point-to-point network (i.e,
                    not a virtual link and not an unnumbered point-to-
                    point network) and the neighboring router's IP
                    address is known, add a Type 3 link (stub network)
                    whose Link ID is the neighbor's IP address, whose
                    Link Data is the mask 0xffffffff indicating a host
                    route, and whose cost is the interface's configured
                    output cost.

            o   Else if the state of the interface is Loopback, add a
                Type 3 link (stub network) as long as this is not an
                interface to an unnumbered serial line.  The Link ID
                should be set to the IP interface address, the Link Data
                set to the mask 0xffffffff (indicating a host route),
                and the cost set to 0.

            o   Else if the state of the interface is Waiting, add a
                Type 3 link (stub network) whose Link ID is the IP
                network number of the attached network and whose Link
                Data is the attached network's address mask.




Moy                                                           [Page 115]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            o   Else, there has been a Designated Router selected for
                the attached network.  If the router is fully adjacent
                to the Designated Router, or if the router itself is
                Designated Router and is fully adjacent to at least one
                other router, add a single Type 2 link (transit network)
                whose Link ID is the IP interface address of the
                attached network's Designated Router (which may be the
                router itself) and whose Link Data is the router's own
                IP interface address.  Otherwise, add a link as if the
                interface state were Waiting (see above).


            Unless otherwise specified, the cost of each link generated
            by the above procedure is equal to the output cost of the
            associated interface.  Note that in the case of serial
            lines, multiple links may be generated by a single
            interface.

            After consideration of all the router interfaces, host links
            are added to the advertisement by examining the list of
            attached hosts.  A host route is represented as a Type 3
            link (stub network) whose Link ID is the host's IP address
            and whose Link Data is the mask of all ones (0xffffffff).

            As an example, consider the router links advertisements
            generated by Router RT3, as pictured in Figure 6.  The area
            containing Router RT3 (Area 1) has been redrawn, with actual
            network addresses, in Figure 15.  Assume that the last byte
            of all of RT3's interface addresses is 3, giving it the
            interface addresses 192.1.1.3 and 192.1.4.3, and that the
            other routers have similar addressing schemes.  In addition,
            assume that all links are functional, and that Router IDs
            are assigned as the smallest IP interface address.

            RT3 originates two router links advertisements, one for Area
            1 and one for the backbone.  Assume that Router RT4 has been
            selected as the Designated router for network 192.1.1.0.
            RT3's router links advertisement for Area 1 is then shown
            below.  It indicates that RT3 has two connections to Area 1,
            the first a link to the transit network 192.1.1.0 and the
            second a link to the stub network 192.1.4.0.  Note that the
            transit network is identified by the IP interface of its
            Designated Router (i.e., the Link ID = 192.1.1.4 which is
            the Designated Router RT4's IP interface to 192.1.1.0).
            Note also that RT3 has indicated that it is capable of
            calculating separate routes based on IP TOS, through setting
            the T-bit in the Options field.  It has also indicated that
            it is an area border router.



Moy                                                           [Page 116]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


              ; RT3's router links advertisement for Area 1

              LS age = 0                     ;always true on origination
              Options = (T-bit|E-bit)        ;TOS-capable
              LS type = 1                    ;indicates router links
              Link State ID = 192.1.1.3      ;RT3's Router ID
              Advertising Router = 192.1.1.3 ;RT3's Router ID
              bit E = 0                      ;not an AS boundary router
              bit B = 1                      ;area border router
              #links = 2
                     Link ID = 192.1.1.4     ;IP address of Desig. Rtr.
                     Link Data = 192.1.1.3   ;RT3's IP interface to net
                     Type = 2                ;connects to transit network
                     # other metrics = 0
                     TOS 0 metric = 1

                     Link ID = 192.1.4.0     ;IP Network number
                     Link Data = 0xffffff00  ;Network mask
                     Type = 3                ;connects to stub network
                     # other metrics = 0
                     TOS 0 metric = 2

            Next RT3's router links advertisement for the backbone is
            shown.  It indicates that RT3 has a single attachment to the
            backbone.  This attachment is via an unnumbered point-to-
            point link to Router RT6.  RT3 has again indicated that it
            is TOS-capable, and that it is an area border router.

              ; RT3's router links advertisement for the backbone

              LS age = 0                     ;always true on origination
              Options = (T-bit|E-bit)        ;TOS-capable
              LS type = 1                    ;indicates router links
              Link State ID = 192.1.1.3      ;RT3's router ID
              Advertising Router = 192.1.1.3 ;RT3's router ID
              bit E = 0                      ;not an AS boundary router
              bit B = 1                      ;area border router
              #links = 1
                     Link ID = 18.10.0.6     ;Neighbor's Router ID
                     Link Data = 0.0.0.3     ;MIB-II ifIndex of P-P link
                     Type = 1                ;connects to router
                     # other metrics = 0
                     TOS 0 metric = 8

            Even though Router RT3 has indicated that it is TOS-capable
            in the above examples, only a single metric (the TOS 0
            metric) has been specified for each interface.  Different
            metrics can be specified for each TOS.  The encoding of TOS



Moy                                                           [Page 117]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            in OSPF link state advertisements is described in Section
            12.3.

            As an example, suppose the point-to-point link between
            Routers RT3 and RT6 in Figure 15 is a satellite link.  The
            AS administrator may want to encourage the use of the line
            for high bandwidth traffic.  This would be done by setting
            the metric artificially low for the appropriate TOS value.
            Router RT3 would then originate the following router links
            advertisement for the backbone (TOS 8 = maximize
            throughput):

              ; RT3's router links advertisement for the backbone

              LS age = 0                  ;always true on origination
              Options = (T-bit|E-bit)     ;TOS-capable
              LS type = 1                 ;indicates router links
              Link State ID = 192.1.1.3   ;RT3's Router ID
              Advertising Router = 192.1.1.3
              bit E = 0                   ;not an AS boundary router
              bit B = 1                   ;area border router
              #links = 1
                     Link ID = 18.10.0.6  ;Neighbor's Router ID
                     Link Data = 0.0.0.3  ;MIB-II ifIndex of P-P link
                     Type = 1             ;connects to router
                     # other metrics = 1
                     TOS 0 metric = 8
                             TOS = 8      ;maximize throughput
                             metric = 1   ;traffic preferred


        12.4.2.  Network links

            A network links advertisement is generated for every transit
            multi-access network.  (A transit network is a network
            having two or more attached routers).  The network links
            advertisement describes all the routers that are attached to
            the network.

            The Designated Router for the network originates the
            advertisement.  The Designated Router originates the
            advertisement only if it is fully adjacent to at least one
            other router on the network.  The network links
            advertisement is flooded throughout the area that contains
            the transit network, and no further.  The networks links
            advertisement lists those routers that are fully adjacent to
            the Designated Router; each fully adjacent router is
            identified by its OSPF Router ID.  The Designated Router



Moy                                                           [Page 118]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            includes itself in this list.

            The Link State ID for a network links advertisement is the
            IP interface address of the Designated Router.  This value,
            masked by the network's address mask (which is also
            contained in the network links advertisement) yields the
            network's IP address.

            A router that has formerly been the Designated Router for a
            network, but is no longer, should flush the network links
            advertisement that it had previously originated.  This
            advertisement is no longer used in the routing table
            calculation.  It is flushed by prematurely incrementing the
            advertisement's age to MaxAge and reflooding (see Section
            14.1). In addition, in those rare cases where a router's
            Router ID has changed, any network links advertisements that
            were originated with the router's previous Router ID must be
            flushed. Since the router may have no idea what it's
            previous Router ID might have been, these network links
            advertisements are indicated by having their Link State ID
            equal to one of the router's IP interface addresses and
            their Advertising Router not equal to the router's current
            Router ID (see Section 13.4 for more details).

            As an example of a network links advertisement, again
            consider the area configuration in Figure 6.  Network links
            advertisements are originated for Network N3 in Area 1,
            Networks N6 and N8 in Area 2, and Network N9 in Area 3.
            Assuming that Router RT4 has been selected as the Designated
            Router for Network N3, the following network links
            advertisement is generated by RT4 on behalf of Network N3
            (see Figure 15 for the address assignments):

              ; network links advertisement for Network N3

              LS age = 0                     ;always true on origination
              Options = (T-bit|E-bit)        ;TOS-capable
              LS type = 2                    ;indicates network links
              Link State ID = 192.1.1.4      ;IP address of Desig. Rtr.
              Advertising Router = 192.1.1.4 ;RT4's Router ID
              Network Mask = 0xffffff00
                     Attached Router = 192.1.1.4    ;Router ID
                     Attached Router = 192.1.1.1    ;Router ID
                     Attached Router = 192.1.1.2    ;Router ID
                     Attached Router = 192.1.1.3    ;Router ID






Moy                                                           [Page 119]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        12.4.3.  Summary links

            Each summary link advertisement describes a route to a
            single destination.  Summary link advertisements are flooded
            throughout a single area only.  The destination described is
            one that is external to the area, yet still belonging to the
            Autonomous System.

            Summary link advertisements are originated by area border
            routers.  The precise summary routes to advertise into an
            area are determined by examining the routing table structure
            (see Section 11) in accordance with the algorithm described
            below. Note that only intra-area routes are advertised into
            the backbone, while both intra-area and inter-area routes
            are advertised into the other areas.

            To determine which routes to advertise into an attached Area
            A, each routing table entry is processed as follows.
            Remember that each routing table entry describes a set of
            equal-cost best paths to a particular destination:


            o   Only Destination Types of network and AS boundary router
                are advertised in summary link advertisements.  If the
                routing table entry's Destination Type is area border
                router, examine the next routing table entry.

            o   AS external routes are never advertised in summary link
                advertisements.  If the routing table entry has Path-
                type of type 1 external or type 2 external, examine the
                next routing table entry.

            o   Else, if the area associated with this set of paths is
                the Area A itself, do not generate a summary link
                advertisement for the route.[14]

            o   Else, if the next hops associated with this set of paths
                belong to Area A itself, do not generate a summary link
                advertisement for the route.[15] This is the logical
                equivalent of a Distance Vector protocol's split horizon
                logic.

            o   Else, if the routing table cost equals or exceeds the
                value LSInfinity, a summary link advertisement cannot be
                generated for this route.

            o   Else, if the destination of this route is an AS boundary
                router, generate a Type 4 link state advertisement for



Moy                                                           [Page 120]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


                the destination, with Link State ID equal to the AS
                boundary router's Router ID and metric equal to the
                routing table entry's cost.  These advertisements should
                not be generated if Area A has been configured as a stub
                area.

            o   Else, the Destination type is network. If this is an
                inter-area route, generate a Type 3 advertisement for
                the destination, with Link State ID equal to the
                network's address (if necessary, the Link State ID can
                also have one or more of the network's host bits set;
                see Appendix F for details) and metric equal to the
                routing table cost.

            o   The one remaining case is an intra-area route to a
                network.  This means that the network is contained in
                one of the router's directly attached areas.  In
                general, this information must be condensed before
                appearing in summary link advertisements.  Remember that
                an area has been defined as a list of address ranges,
                each range consisting of an [address,mask] pair and a
                status indication of either Advertise or DoNotAdvertise.
                At most a single Type 3 advertisement is made for each
                range. When the range's status indicates Advertise, a
                Type 3 advertisement is generated with Link State ID
                equal to the range's address (if necessary, the Link
                State ID can also have one or more of the range's "host"
                bits set; see Appendix F for details) and cost equal to
                the smallest cost of any of the component networks. When
                the range's status indicates DoNotAdvertise, the Type 3
                advertisement is suppressed and the component networks
                remain hidden from other areas.

                By default, if a network is not contained in any
                explicitly configured address range, a Type 3
                advertisement is generated with Link State ID equal to
                the network's address (if necessary, the Link State ID
                can also have one or more of the network's "host" bits
                set; see Appendix F for details) and metric equal to the
                network's routing table cost.

                If virtual links are being used to provide/increase
                connectivity of the backbone, routing information
                concerning the backbone networks should not be condensed
                before being summarized into the virtual links' Transit
                areas. Nor should the advertisement of backbone networks
                into Transit areas be suppressed.  In other words, the
                backbone's configured ranges should be ignored when



Moy                                                           [Page 121]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


                originating summary links into Transit areas.  The
                existence of virtual links is determined during the
                shortest path calculation for the Transit areas (see
                Section 16.1).

            If a router advertises a summary advertisement for a
            destination which then becomes unreachable, the router must
            then flush the advertisement from the routing domain by
            setting its age to MaxAge and reflooding (see Section 14.1).
            Also, if the destination is still reachable, yet can no
            longer be advertised according to the above procedure (e.g.,
            it is now an inter-area route, when it used to be an intra-
            area route associated with some non-backbone area; it would
            thus no longer be advertisable to the backbone), the
            advertisement should also be flushed from the routing
            domain.

            For an example of summary link advertisements, consider
            again the area configuration in Figure 6.  Routers RT3, RT4,
            RT7, RT10 and RT11 are all area border routers, and
            therefore are originating summary link advertisements.
            Consider in particular Router RT4.  Its routing table was
            calculated as the example in Section 11.3.  RT4 originates
            summary link advertisements into both the backbone and Area
            1.  Into the backbone, Router RT4 originates separate
            advertisements for each of the networks N1-N4.  Into Area 1,
            Router RT4 originates separate advertisements for networks
            N6-N8 and the AS boundary routers RT5,RT7.  It also
            condenses host routes Ia and Ib into a single summary link
            advertisement.  Finally, the routes to networks N9,N10,N11
            and Host H1 are advertised by a single summary link
            advertisement.  This condensation was originally performed
            by the router RT11.

            These advertisements are illustrated graphically in Figures
            7 and 8.  Two of the summary link advertisements originated
            by Router RT4 follow.  The actual IP addresses for the
            networks and routers in question have been assigned in
            Figure 15.

              ; summary link advertisement for Network N1,
              ; originated by Router RT4 into the backbone

              LS age = 0                  ;always true on origination
              Options = (T-bit|E-bit)     ;TOS-capable
              LS type = 3                 ;summary link to IP net
              Link State ID = 192.1.2.0   ;N1's IP network number
              Advertising Router = 192.1.1.4       ;RT4's ID



Moy                                                           [Page 122]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


                     TOS = 0
                     metric = 4

              ; summary link advertisement for AS boundary router RT7
              ; originated by Router RT4 into Area 1

              LS age = 0                  ;always true on origination
              Options = (T-bit|E-bit)     ;TOS-capable
              LS type = 4                 ;summary link to ASBR
              Link State ID = Router RT7's ID
              Advertising Router = 192.1.1.4       ;RT4's ID
                     TOS = 0
                     metric = 14

            Summary link advertisements pertain to a single destination
            (IP network or AS boundary router).  However, for a single
            destination there may be separate sets of paths, and
            therefore separate routing table entries, for each Type of
            Service.  All these entries must be considered when building
            the summary link advertisement for the destination; a single
            advertisement must specify the separate costs (if they
            exist) for each TOS.  The encoding of TOS in OSPF link state
            advertisements is described in Section 12.3.

            Clearing the T-bit in the Options field of a summary link
            advertisement indicates that there is a TOS 0 path to the
            destination, but no paths for non-zero TOS.  This can happen
            when non-TOS-capable routers exist in the routing domain
            (see Section 2.4).

        12.4.4.  Originating summary links into stub areas

            The algorithm in Section 12.4.3 is optional when Area A is
            an OSPF stub area. Area border routers connecting to a stub
            area can originate summary link advertisements into the area
            according to the above Section's algorithm, or can choose to
            originate only a subset of the advertisements, possibly
            under configuration control.  The fewer advertisements
            originated, the smaller the stub area's link state database,
            further reducing the demands on its routers' resources.
            However, omitting advertisements may also lead to sub-
            optimal inter-area routing, although routing will continue
            to function.

            As specified in Section 12.4.3, Type 4 link state
            advertisements (ASBR summary links) are never originated
            into stub areas.




Moy                                                           [Page 123]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            In a stub area, instead of importing external routes each
            area border router originates a "default summary link" into
            the area. The Link State ID for the default summary link is
            set to DefaultDestination, and the metric set to the (per-
            area) configurable parameter StubDefaultCost.  Note that
            StubDefaultCost need not be configured identically in all of
            the stub area's area border routers.

        12.4.5.  AS external links

            AS external link advertisements describe routes to
            destinations external to the Autonomous System.  Most AS
            external link advertisements describe routes to specific
            external destinations; in these cases the advertisement's
            Link State ID is set to the destination network's IP address
            (if necessary, the Link State ID can also have one or more
            of the network's "host" bits set; see Appendix F for
            details).  However, a default route for the Autonomous
            System can be described in an AS external link advertisement
            by setting the advertisement's Link State ID to
            DefaultDestination (0.0.0.0).  AS external link
            advertisements are originated by AS boundary routers.  An AS
            boundary router originates a single AS external link
            advertisement for each external route that it has learned,
            either through another routing protocol (such as EGP), or
            through configuration information.

            In general, AS external link advertisements are the only
            type of link state advertisements that are flooded
            throughout the entire Autonomous System; all other types of
            link state advertisements are specific to a single area.
            However, AS external link advertisements are not flooded
            into/throughout stub areas (see Section 3.6).  This enables
            a reduction in link state database size for routers internal
            to stub areas.

            The metric that is advertised for an external route can be
            one of two types.  Type 1 metrics are comparable to the link
            state metric.  Type 2 metrics are assumed to be larger than
            the cost of any intra-AS path.  As with summary link
            advertisements, if separate paths exist based on TOS,
            separate TOS costs can be included in the AS external link
            advertisement.  The encoding of TOS in OSPF link state
            advertisements is described in Section 12.3.  If the T-bit
            of the advertisement's Options field is clear, no non-zero
            TOS paths to the destination exist.

            If a router advertises an AS external link advertisement for



Moy                                                           [Page 124]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            a destination which then becomes unreachable, the router
            must then flush the advertisement from the routing domain by
            setting its age to MaxAge and reflooding (see Section 14.1).

            For an example of AS external link advertisements, consider
            once again the AS pictured in Figure 6.  There are two AS
            boundary routers: RT5 and RT7.  Router RT5 originates three
            external link advertisements, for networks N12-N14.  Router
            RT7 originates two external link advertisements, for
            networks N12 and N15.  Assume that RT7 has learned its route
            to N12 via EGP, and that it wishes to advertise a Type 2
            metric to the AS.  RT7 would then originate the following
            advertisement for N12:

              ; AS external link advertisement for Network N12,
              ; originated by Router RT7

              LS age = 0                  ;always true on origination
              Options = (T-bit|E-bit)     ;TOS-capable
              LS type = 5                 ;indicates AS external link
              Link State ID = N12's IP network number
              Advertising Router = Router RT7's ID
                     bit E = 1            ;Type 2 metric
                     TOS = 0
                     metric = 2
                     Forwarding address = 0.0.0.0

            In the above example, the forwarding address field has been
            set to 0.0.0.0, indicating that packets for the external
            destination should be forwarded to the advertising OSPF
            router (RT7).  This is not always desirable.  Consider the
            example pictured in Figure 16.  There are three OSPF routers
            (RTA, RTB and RTC) connected to a common network.  Only one
            of these routers, RTA, is exchanging EGP information with
            the non-OSPF router RTX.  RTA must then originate AS
            external link advertisements for those destinations it has
            learned from RTX.  By using the AS external link
            advertisement's forwarding address field, RTA can specify
            that packets for these destinations be forwarded directly to
            RTX.  Without this feature, Routers RTB and RTC would take
            an extra hop to get to these destinations.

            Note that when the forwarding address field is non-zero, it
            should point to a router belonging to another Autonomous
            System.

            A forwarding address can also be specified for the default
            route.  For example, in figure 16 RTA may want to specify



Moy                                                           [Page 125]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            that all externally-destined packets should by default be
            forwarded to its EGP peer RTX.  The resulting AS external
            link advertisement is pictured below.  Note that the Link
            State ID is set to DefaultDestination.

              ; Default route, originated by Router RTA
              ; Packets forwarded through RTX

              LS age = 0                  ;always true on origination
              Options = (T-bit|E-bit)          ;TOS-capable
              LS type = 5                 ;indicates AS external link
              Link State ID = DefaultDestination  ; default route
              Advertising Router = Router RTA's ID
                     bit E = 1            ;Type 2 metric
                     TOS = 0
                     metric = 1
                     Forwarding address = RTX's IP address

            In figure 16, suppose instead that both RTA and RTB exchange
            EGP information with RTX.  In this case, RTA and RTB would
            originate the same set of AS external link advertisements.
            These advertisements, if they specify the same metric, would
            be functionally equivalent since they would specify the same
            destination and forwarding address (RTX).  This leads to a
            clear duplication of effort.  If only one of RTA or RTB
            originated the set of external advertisements, the routing
            would remain the same, and the size of the link state
            database would decrease.  However, it must be unambiguously
            defined as to which router originates the advertisements
            (otherwise neither may, or the identity of the originator
            may oscillate).  The following rule is thereby established:
            if two routers, both reachable from one another, originate
            functionally equivalent AS external advertisements (i.e.,
            same destination, cost and non-zero forwarding address),
            then the advertisement originated by the router having the
            highest OSPF Router ID is used.  The router having the lower
            OSPF Router ID can then flush its advertisement.  Flushing a
            link state advertisement is discussed in Section 14.1.

13.  The Flooding Procedure

    Link State Update packets provide the mechanism for flooding link
    state advertisements.  A Link State Update packet may contain
    several distinct advertisements, and floods each advertisement one
    hop further from its point of origination.  To make the flooding
    procedure reliable, each advertisement must be acknowledged
    separately.  Acknowledgments are transmitted in Link State
    Acknowledgment packets.  Many separate acknowledgments can also be



Moy                                                           [Page 126]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994



                                +
                                |
                      +---+.....|.EGP
                      |RTA|-----|.....+---+
                      +---+     |-----|RTX|
                                |     +---+
                      +---+     |
                      |RTB|-----|
                      +---+     |
                                |
                      +---+     |
                      |RTC|-----|
                      +---+     |
                                |
                                +


               Figure 16: Forwarding address example

    grouped together into a single packet.

    The flooding procedure starts when a Link State Update packet has
    been received.  Many consistency checks have been made on the
    received packet before being handed to the flooding procedure (see
    Section 8.2).  In particular, the Link State Update packet has been
    associated with a particular neighbor, and a particular area.  If
    the neighbor is in a lesser state than Exchange, the packet should
    be dropped without further processing.

    All types of link state advertisements, other than AS external link
    advertisements, are associated with a specific area.  However, link
    state advertisements do not contain an area field.  A link state
    advertisement's area must be deduced from the Link State Update
    packet header.

    For each link state advertisement contained in the packet, the
    following steps are taken:


    (1) Validate the advertisement's LS checksum.  If the checksum turns
        out to be invalid, discard the advertisement and get the next
        one from the Link State Update packet.

    (2) Examine the link state advertisement's LS type.  If the LS type
        is unknown, discard the advertisement and get the next one from
        the Link State Update Packet.  This specification defines LS
        types 1-5 (see Section 4.3).



Moy                                                           [Page 127]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    (3) Else if this is a AS external link advertisement (LS type = 5),
        and the area has been configured as a stub area, discard the
        advertisement and get the next one from the Link State Update
        Packet.  AS external link advertisements are not flooded
        into/throughout stub areas (see Section 3.6).

    (4) Else if the advertisement's LS age is equal to MaxAge, and there
        is currently no instance of the advertisement in the router's
        link state database, then take the following actions:

        (a) Acknowledge the receipt of the advertisement by sending a
            Link State Acknowledgment packet back to the sending
            neighbor (see Section 13.5).

        (b) Purge all outstanding requests for equal or previous
            instances of the advertisement from the sending neighbor's
            Link State Request list (see Section 10).

        (c) If the sending neighbor is in state Exchange or in state
            Loading, then install the MaxAge advertisement in the link
            state database.  Otherwise, simply discard the
            advertisement.  In either case, examine the next
            advertisement (if any) listed in the Link State Update
            packet.

    (5) Otherwise, find the instance of this advertisement that is
        currently contained in the router's link state database.  If
        there is no database copy, or the received advertisement is more
        recent than the database copy (see Section 13.1 below for the
        determination of which advertisement is more recent) the
        following steps must be performed:

        (a) If there is already a database copy, and if the database
            copy was installed less than MinLSInterval seconds ago,
            discard the new advertisement (without acknowledging it) and
            examine the next advertisement (if any) listed in the Link
            State Update packet.

        (b) Otherwise immediately flood the new advertisement out some
            subset of the router's interfaces (see Section 13.3).  In
            some cases (e.g., the state of the receiving interface is DR
            and the advertisement was received from a router other than
            the Backup DR) the advertisement will be flooded back out
            the receiving interface.  This occurrence should be noted
            for later use by the acknowledgment process (Section 13.5).

        (c) Remove the current database copy from all neighbors' Link
            state retransmission lists.



Moy                                                           [Page 128]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        (d) Install the new advertisement in the link state database
            (replacing the current database copy).  This may cause the
            routing table calculation to be scheduled.  In addition,
            timestamp the new advertisement with the current time (i.e.,
            the time it was received).  The flooding procedure cannot
            overwrite the newly installed advertisement until
            MinLSInterval seconds have elapsed.  The advertisement
            installation process is discussed further in Section 13.2.

        (e) Possibly acknowledge the receipt of the advertisement by
            sending a Link State Acknowledgment packet back out the
            receiving interface.  This is explained below in Section
            13.5.

        (f) If this new link state advertisement indicates that it was
            originated by the receiving router itself (i.e., is
            considered a self-originated advertisement), the router must
            take special action, either updating the advertisement or in
            some cases flushing it from the routing domain. For a
            description of how self-originated advertisements are
            detected and subsequently handled, see Section 13.4.

    (6) Else, if there is an instance of the advertisement on the
        sending neighbor's Link state request list, an error has
        occurred in the Database Exchange process.  In this case,
        restart the Database Exchange process by generating the neighbor
        event BadLSReq for the sending neighbor and stop processing the
        Link State Update packet.

    (7) Else, if the received advertisement is the same instance as the
        database copy (i.e., neither one is more recent) the following
        two steps should be performed:

        (a) If the advertisement is listed in the Link state
            retransmission list for the receiving adjacency, the router
            itself is expecting an acknowledgment for this
            advertisement.  The router should treat the received
            advertisement as an acknowledgment, by removing the
            advertisement from the Link state retransmission list.  This
            is termed an "implied acknowledgment".  Its occurrence
            should be noted for later use by the acknowledgment process
            (Section 13.5).

        (b) Possibly acknowledge the receipt of the advertisement by
            sending a Link State Acknowledgment packet back out the
            receiving interface.  This is explained below in Section
            13.5.




Moy                                                           [Page 129]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    (8) Else, the database copy is more recent.  Note an unusual event
        to network management, discard the advertisement and process the
        next link state advertisement contained in the Link State Update
        packet.


    13.1.  Determining which link state is newer

        When a router encounters two instances of a link state
        advertisement, it must determine which is more recent.  This
        occurred above when comparing a received advertisement to its
        database copy.  This comparison must also be done during the
        Database Exchange procedure which occurs during adjacency
        bring-up.

        A link state advertisement is identified by its LS type, Link
        State ID and Advertising Router.  For two instances of the same
        advertisement, the LS sequence number, LS age, and LS checksum
        fields are used to determine which instance is more recent:


        o   The advertisement having the newer LS sequence number is
            more recent.  See Section 12.1.6 for an explanation of the
            LS sequence number space.  If both instances have the same
            LS sequence number, then:

        o   If the two instances have different LS checksums, then the
            instance having the larger LS checksum (when considered as a
            16-bit unsigned integer) is considered more recent.

        o   Else, if only one of the instances has its LS age field set
            to MaxAge, the instance of age MaxAge is considered to be
            more recent.

        o   Else, if the LS age fields of the two instances differ by
            more than MaxAgeDiff, the instance having the smaller
            (younger) LS age is considered to be more recent.

        o   Else, the two instances are considered to be identical.


    13.2.  Installing link state advertisements in the database

        Installing a new link state advertisement in the database,
        either as the result of flooding or a newly self-originated
        advertisement, may cause the OSPF routing table structure to be
        recalculated.  The contents of the new advertisement should be
        compared to the old instance, if present.  If there is no



Moy                                                           [Page 130]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        difference, there is no need to recalculate the routing table.
        (Note that even if the contents are the same, the LS checksum
        will probably be different, since the checksum covers the LS
        sequence number.)

        If the contents are different, the following pieces of the
        routing table must be recalculated, depending on the new
        advertisement's LS type field:


        Router links and network links advertisements
            The entire routing table must be recalculated, starting with
            the shortest path calculations for each area (not just the
            area whose topological database has changed).  The reason
            that the shortest path calculation cannot be restricted to
            the single changed area has to do with the fact that AS
            boundary routers may belong to multiple areas.  A change in
            the area currently providing the best route may force the
            router to use an intra-area route provided by a different
            area.[16]

        Summary link advertisements
            The best route to the destination described by the summary
            link advertisement must be recalculated (see Section 16.5).
            If this destination is an AS boundary router, it may also be
            necessary to re-examine all the AS external link
            advertisements.

        AS external link advertisements
            The best route to the destination described by the AS
            external link advertisement must be recalculated (see
            Section 16.6).


        Also, any old instance of the advertisement must be removed from
        the database when the new advertisement is installed.  This old
        instance must also be removed from all neighbors' Link state
        retransmission lists (see Section 10).


    13.3.  Next step in the flooding procedure

        When a new (and more recent) advertisement has been received, it
        must be flooded out some set of the router's interfaces.  This
        section describes the second part of flooding procedure (the
        first part being the processing that occurred in Section 13),
        namely, selecting the outgoing interfaces and adding the
        advertisement to the appropriate neighbors' Link state



Moy                                                           [Page 131]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        retransmission lists.  Also included in this part of the
        flooding procedure is the maintenance of the neighbors' Link
        state request lists.

        This section is equally applicable to the flooding of an
        advertisement that the router itself has just originated (see
        Section 12.4).  For these advertisements, this section provides
        the entirety of the flooding procedure (i.e., the processing of
        Section 13 is not performed, since, for example, the
        advertisement has not been received from a neighbor and
        therefore does not need to be acknowledged).

        Depending upon the advertisement's LS type, the advertisement
        can be flooded out only certain interfaces.  These interfaces,
        defined by the following, are called the eligible interfaces:


        AS external link advertisements (LS Type = 5)
            AS external link advertisements are flooded throughout the
            entire AS, with the exception of stub areas (see Section
            3.6).  The eligible interfaces are all the router's
            interfaces, excluding virtual links and those interfaces
            attaching to stub areas.

        All other LS types
            All other types are specific to a single area (Area A).  The
            eligible interfaces are all those interfaces attaching to
            the Area A.  If Area A is the backbone, this includes all
            the virtual links.


        Link state databases must remain synchronized over all
        adjacencies associated with the above eligible interfaces.  This
        is accomplished by executing the following steps on each
        eligible interface.  It should be noted that this procedure may
        decide not to flood a link state advertisement out a particular
        interface, if there is a high probability that the attached
        neighbors have already received the advertisement.  However, in
        these cases the flooding procedure must be absolutely sure that
        the neighbors eventually do receive the advertisement, so the
        advertisement is still added to each adjacency's Link state
        retransmission list.  For each eligible interface:


        (1) Each of the neighbors attached to this interface are
            examined, to determine whether they must receive the new
            advertisement.  The following steps are executed for each
            neighbor:



Moy                                                           [Page 132]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            (a) If the neighbor is in a lesser state than Exchange, it
                does not participate in flooding, and the next neighbor
                should be examined.

            (b) Else, if the adjacency is not yet full (neighbor state
                is Exchange or Loading), examine the Link state request
                list associated with this adjacency.  If there is an
                instance of the new advertisement on the list, it
                indicates that the neighboring router has an instance of
                the advertisement already.  Compare the new
                advertisement to the neighbor's copy:

                o   If the new advertisement is less recent, then
                    examine the next neighbor.

                o   If the two copies are the same instance, then delete
                    the advertisement from the Link state request list,
                    and examine the next neighbor.[17]

                o   Else, the new advertisement is more recent.  Delete
                    the advertisement from the Link state request list.

            (c) If the new advertisement was received from this
                neighbor, examine the next neighbor.

            (d) At this point we are not positive that the neighbor has
                an up-to-date instance of this new advertisement.  Add
                the new advertisement to the Link state retransmission
                list for the adjacency.  This ensures that the flooding
                procedure is reliable; the advertisement will be
                retransmitted at intervals until an acknowledgment is
                seen from the neighbor.

        (2) The router must now decide whether to flood the new link
            state advertisement out this interface.  If in the previous
            step, the link state advertisement was NOT added to any of
            the Link state retransmission lists, there is no need to
            flood the advertisement out the interface and the next
            interface should be examined.

        (3) If the new advertisement was received on this interface, and
            it was received from either the Designated Router or the
            Backup Designated Router, chances are that all the neighbors
            have received the advertisement already.  Therefore, examine
            the next interface.

        (4) If the new advertisement was received on this interface, and
            the interface state is Backup (i.e., the router itself is



Moy                                                           [Page 133]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            the Backup Designated Router), examine the next interface.
            The Designated Router will do the flooding on this
            interface.  If the Designated Router fails, this router will
            end up retransmitting the updates.

        (5) If this step is reached, the advertisement must be flooded
            out the interface.  Send a Link State Update packet (with
            the new advertisement as contents) out the interface.  The
            advertisement's LS age must be incremented by InfTransDelay
            (which must be > 0) when copied into the outgoing Link State
            Update packet (until the LS age field reaches its maximum
            value of MaxAge).

            On broadcast networks, the Link State Update packets are
            multicast.  The destination IP address specified for the
            Link State Update Packet depends on the state of the
            interface.  If the interface state is DR or Backup, the
            address AllSPFRouters should be used.  Otherwise, the
            address AllDRouters should be used.

            On non-broadcast, multi-access networks, separate Link State
            Update packets must be sent, as unicasts, to each adjacent
            neighbor (i.e., those in state Exchange or greater).  The
            destination IP addresses for these packets are the
            neighbors' IP addresses.


    13.4.  Receiving self-originated link state

        It is a common occurrence for a router to receive self-
        originated link state advertisements via the flooding procedure.
        A self-originated advertisement is detected when either 1) the
        advertisement's Advertising Router is equal to the router's own
        Router ID or 2) the advertisement is a network links
        advertisement and its Link State ID is equal to one of the
        router's own IP interface addresses.

        However, if the received self-originated advertisement is newer
        than the last instance that the router actually originated, the
        router must take special action.  The reception of such an
        advertisement indicates that there are link state advertisements
        in the routing domain that were originated before the last time
        the router was restarted. In most cases, the router must then
        advance the advertisement's LS sequence number one past the
        received LS sequence number, and originate a new instance of the
        advertisement.

        It may be the case the router no longer wishes to originate the



Moy                                                           [Page 134]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        received advertisement. Possible examples include: 1) the
        advertisement is a summary link or AS external link and the
        router no longer has an (advertisable) route to the destination,
        2) the advertisement is a network links advertisement but the
        router is no longer Designated Router for the network or 3) the
        advertisement is a network links advertisement whose Link State
        ID is one of the router's own IP interface addresses but whose
        Advertising Router is not equal to the router's own Router ID
        (this latter case should be rare, and it indicates that the
        router's Router ID has changed since originating the
        advertisement).  In all these cases, instead of updating the
        advertisement, the advertisement should be flushed from the
        routing domain by incrementing the received advertisement's LS
        age to MaxAge and reflooding (see Section 14.1).


    13.5.  Sending Link State Acknowledgment packets

        Each newly received link state advertisement must be
        acknowledged.  This is usually done by sending Link State
        Acknowledgment packets.  However, acknowledgments can also be
        accomplished implicitly by sending Link State Update packets
        (see step 7a of Section 13).

        Many acknowledgments may be grouped together into a single Link
        State Acknowledgment packet.  Such a packet is sent back out the
        interface that has received the advertisements.  The packet can
        be sent in one of two ways: delayed and sent on an interval
        timer, or sent directly (as a unicast) to a particular neighbor.
        The particular acknowledgment strategy used depends on the
        circumstances surrounding the receipt of the advertisement.

        Sending delayed acknowledgments accomplishes several things: it
        facilitates the packaging of multiple acknowledgments in a
        single Link State Acknowledgment packet; it enables a single
        Link State Acknowledgment packet to indicate acknowledgments to
        several neighbors at once (through multicasting); and it
        randomizes the Link State Acknowledgment packets sent by the
        various routers attached to a multi-access network.  The fixed
        interval between a router's delayed transmissions must be short
        (less than RxmtInterval) or needless retransmissions will ensue.

        Direct acknowledgments are sent to a particular neighbor in
        response to the receipt of duplicate link state advertisements.
        These acknowledgments are sent as unicasts, and are sent
        immediately when the duplicate is received.

        The precise procedure for sending Link State Acknowledgment



Moy                                                           [Page 135]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        packets is described in Table 19.  The circumstances surrounding
        the receipt of the advertisement are listed in the left column.
        The acknowledgment action then taken is listed in one of the two
        right columns.  This action depends on the state of the
        concerned interface; interfaces in state Backup behave
        differently from interfaces in all other states.  Delayed
        acknowledgments must be delivered to all adjacent routers
        associated with the interface.  On broadcast networks, this is
        accomplished by sending the delayed Link State Acknowledgment
        packets as multicasts.  The Destination IP address used depends
        on the state of the interface.  If the state is DR or Backup,
        the destination AllSPFRouters is used.  In other states, the
        destination AllDRouters is used.  On non-broadcast networks,
        delayed Link State Acknowledgment packets must be unicast
        separately over each adjacency (i.e., neighbor whose state is >=
        Exchange).

        The reasoning behind sending the above packets as multicasts is
        best explained by an example.  Consider the network
        configuration depicted in Figure 15.  Suppose RT4 has been
        elected as Designated Router, and RT3 as Backup Designated
        Router for the network N3.  When Router RT4 floods a new
        advertisement to Network N3, it is received by routers RT1, RT2,
        and RT3.  These routers will not flood the advertisement back
        onto net N3, but they still must ensure that their topological
        databases remain synchronized with their adjacent neighbors.  So
        RT1, RT2, and RT4 are waiting to see an acknowledgment from RT3.
        Likewise, RT4 and RT3 are both waiting to see acknowledgments
        from RT1 and RT2.  This is best achieved by sending the
        acknowledgments as multicasts.

        The reason that the acknowledgment logic for Backup DRs is
        slightly different is because they perform differently during
        the flooding of link state advertisements (see Section 13.3,
        step 4).



    13.6.  Retransmitting link state advertisements

        Advertisements flooded out an adjacency are placed on the
        adjacency's Link state retransmission list.  In order to ensure
        that flooding is reliable, these advertisements are
        retransmitted until they are acknowledged.  The length of time
        between retransmissions is a configurable per-interface value,
        RxmtInterval.  If this is set too low for an interface, needless
        retransmissions will ensue.  If the value is set too high, the
        speed of the flooding, in the face of lost packets, may be



Moy                                                           [Page 136]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994






                                    Action taken in state
    Circumstances          Backup                All other states
    _______________________________________________________________
    Advertisement  has     No  acknowledgment    No  acknowledgment
    been  flooded back     sent.                 sent.
    out receiving  in-
    terface  (see Sec-
    tion 13, step 5b).
    _______________________________________________________________
    Advertisement   is     Delayed acknowledg-   Delayed       ack-
    more  recent  than     ment sent if adver-   nowledgment sent.
    database copy, but     tisement   received
    was   not  flooded     from    Designated
    back out receiving     Router,  otherwise
    interface              do nothing
    _______________________________________________________________
    Advertisement is a     Delayed acknowledg-   No  acknowledgment
    duplicate, and was     ment sent if adver-   sent.
    treated as an  im-     tisement   received
    plied  acknowledg-     from    Designated
    ment (see  Section     Router,  otherwise
    13, step 7a).          do nothing
    _______________________________________________________________
    Advertisement is a     Direct acknowledg-    Direct acknowledg-
    duplicate, and was     ment sent.            ment sent.
    not treated as  an
    implied       ack-
    nowledgment.
    _______________________________________________________________
    Advertisement's LS     Direct acknowledg-    Direct acknowledg-
    age is equal to        ment sent.            ment sent.
    MaxAge, and there is
    no current instance
    of the advertisement
    in the link state
    database (see
    Section 13, step 4).


             Table 19: Sending link state acknowledgements.







Moy                                                           [Page 137]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        affected.

        Several retransmitted advertisements may fit into a single Link
        State Update packet.  When advertisements are to be
        retransmitted, only the number fitting in a single Link State
        Update packet should be transmitted.  Another packet of
        retransmissions can be sent when some of the advertisements are
        acknowledged, or on the next firing of the retransmission timer.

        Link State Update Packets carrying retransmissions are always
        sent as unicasts (directly to the physical address of the
        neighbor).  They are never sent as multicasts.  Each
        advertisement's LS age must be incremented by InfTransDelay
        (which must be > 0) when copied into the outgoing Link State
        Update packet (until the LS age field reaches its maximum value
        of MaxAge).

        If the adjacent router goes down, retransmissions may occur
        until the adjacency is destroyed by OSPF's Hello Protocol.  When
        the adjacency is destroyed, the Link state retransmission list
        is cleared.


    13.7.  Receiving link state acknowledgments

        Many consistency checks have been made on a received Link State
        Acknowledgment packet before it is handed to the flooding
        procedure.  In particular, it has been associated with a
        particular neighbor.  If this neighbor is in a lesser state than
        Exchange, the Link State Acknowledgment packet is discarded.

        Otherwise, for each acknowledgment in the Link State
        Acknowledgment packet, the following steps are performed:


        o   Does the advertisement acknowledged have an instance on the
            Link state retransmission list for the neighbor?  If not,
            examine the next acknowledgment.  Otherwise:

        o   If the acknowledgment is for the same instance that is
            contained on the list, remove the item from the list and
            examine the next acknowledgment.  Otherwise:

        o   Log the questionable acknowledgment, and examine the next
            one.






Moy                                                           [Page 138]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


14.  Aging The Link State Database

    Each link state advertisement has an LS age field.  The LS age is
    expressed in seconds.  An advertisement's LS age field is
    incremented while it is contained in a router's database.  Also,
    when copied into a Link State Update Packet for flooding out a
    particular interface, the advertisement's LS age is incremented by
    InfTransDelay.

    An advertisement's LS age is never incremented past the value
    MaxAge.  Advertisements having age MaxAge are not used in the
    routing table calculation.  As a router ages its link state
    database, an advertisement's LS age may reach MaxAge.[18] At this
    time, the router must attempt to flush the advertisement from the
    routing domain.  This is done simply by reflooding the MaxAge
    advertisement just as if it was a newly originated advertisement
    (see Section 13.3).

    When creating a Database summary list for a newly forming adjacency,
    any MaxAge advertisements present in the link state database are
    added to the neighbor's Link state retransmission list instead of
    the neighbor's Database summary list.  See Section 10.3 for more
    details.

    A MaxAge advertisement must be removed immediately from the router's
    link state database as soon as both a) it is no longer contained on
    any neighbor Link state retransmission lists and b) none of the
    router's neighbors are in states Exchange or Loading.

    When, in the process of aging the link state database, an
    advertisement's LS age hits a multiple of CheckAge, its LS checksum
    should be verified.  If the LS checksum is incorrect, a program or
    memory error has been detected, and at the very least the router
    itself should be restarted.


    14.1.  Premature aging of advertisements

        A link state advertisement can be flushed from the routing
        domain by setting its LS age to MaxAge and reflooding the
        advertisement.  This procedure follows the same course as
        flushing an advertisement whose LS age has naturally reached the
        value MaxAge (see Section 14).  In particular, the MaxAge
        advertisement is removed from the router's link state database
        as soon as a) it is no longer contained on any neighbor Link
        state retransmission lists and b) none of the router's neighbors
        are in states Exchange or Loading.  We call the setting of an
        advertisement's LS age to MaxAge premature aging.



Moy                                                           [Page 139]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        Premature aging is used when it is time for a self-originated
        advertisement's sequence number field to wrap.  At this point,
        the current advertisement instance (having LS sequence number of
        0x7fffffff) must be prematurely aged and flushed from the
        routing domain before a new instance with sequence number
        0x80000001 can be originated.  See Section 12.1.6 for more
        information.

        Premature aging can also be used when, for example, one of the
        router's previously advertised external routes is no longer
        reachable.  In this circumstance, the router can flush its
        external advertisement from the routing domain via premature
        aging. This procedure is preferable to the alternative, which is
        to originate a new advertisement for the destination specifying
        a metric of LSInfinity.  Premature aging is also be used when
        unexpectedly receiving self-originated advertisements during the
        flooding procedure (see Section 13.4).

        A router may only prematurely age its own self-originated link
        state advertisements. The router may not prematurely age
        advertisements that have been originated by other routers. An
        advertisement is considered self-originated when either 1) the
        advertisement's Advertising Router is equal to the router's own
        Router ID or 2) the advertisement is a network links
        advertisement and its Link State ID is equal to one of the
        router's own IP interface addresses.


15.  Virtual Links

    The single backbone area (Area ID = 0.0.0.0) cannot be disconnected,
    or some areas of the Autonomous System will become unreachable.  To
    establish/maintain connectivity of the backbone, virtual links can
    be configured through non-backbone areas.  Virtual links serve to
    connect physically separate components of the backbone.  The two
    endpoints of a virtual link are area border routers.  The virtual
    link must be configured in both routers.  The configuration
    information in each router consists of the other virtual endpoint
    (the other area border router), and the non-backbone area the two
    routers have in common (called the transit area).  Virtual links
    cannot be configured through stub areas (see Section 3.6).

    The virtual link is treated as if it were an unnumbered point-to-
    point network (belonging to the backbone) joining the two area
    border routers.  An attempt is made to establish an adjacency over
    the virtual link.  When this adjacency is established, the virtual
    link will be included in backbone router links advertisements, and
    OSPF packets pertaining to the backbone area will flow over the



Moy                                                           [Page 140]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    adjacency.  Such an adjacency has been referred to in this document
    as a "virtual adjacency".

    In each endpoint router, the cost and viability of the virtual link
    is discovered by examining the routing table entry for the other
    endpoint router.  (The entry's associated area must be the
    configured transit area).  Actually, there may be a separate routing
    table entry for each Type of Service.  These are called the virtual
    link's corresponding routing table entries.  The InterfaceUp event
    occurs for a virtual link when its corresponding TOS 0 routing table
    entry becomes reachable.  Conversely, the InterfaceDown event occurs
    when its TOS 0 routing table entry becomes unreachable.[19] In other
    words, the virtual link's viability is determined by the existence
    of an intra-area path, through the transit area, between the two
    endpoints.  Note that a virtual link whose underlying path has cost
    greater than hexadecimal 0xffff (the maximum size of an interface
    cost in a router links advertisement) should be considered
    inoperational (i.e., treated the same as if the path did not exist).

    The other details concerning virtual links are as follows:

    o   AS external links are NEVER flooded over virtual adjacencies.
        This would be duplication of effort, since the same AS external
        links are already flooded throughout the virtual link's transit
        area.  For this same reason, AS external link advertisements are
        not summarized over virtual adjacencies during the Database
        Exchange process.

    o   The cost of a virtual link is NOT configured.  It is defined to
        be the cost of the intra-area path between the two defining area
        border routers.  This cost appears in the virtual link's
        corresponding routing table entry.  When the cost of a virtual
        link changes, a new router links advertisement should be
        originated for the backbone area.

    o   Just as the virtual link's cost and viability are determined by
        the routing table build process (through construction of the
        routing table entry for the other endpoint), so are the IP
        interface address for the virtual interface and the virtual
        neighbor's IP address.  These are used when sending OSPF
        protocol packets over the virtual link. Note that when one (or
        both) of the virtual link endpoints connect to the transit area
        via an unnumbered point-to-point link, it may be impossible to
        calculate either the virtual interface's IP address and/or the
        virtual neighbor's IP address, thereby causing the virtual link
        to fail.





Moy                                                           [Page 141]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    o   In each endpoint's router links advertisement for the backbone,
        the virtual link is represented as a Type 4 link whose Link ID
        is set to the virtual neighbor's OSPF Router ID and whose Link
        Data is set to the virtual interface's IP address.  See Section
        12.4.1 for more information. Note that it may be the case that
        there is a TOS 0 path, but no non-zero TOS paths, between the
        two endpoint routers.  In this case, both routers must revert to
        being non-TOS-capable, clearing the T-bit in the Options field
        of their backbone router links advertisements.

    o   When virtual links are configured for the backbone, information
        concerning backbone networks should not be condensed before
        being summarized for the transit areas.  In other words, each
        backbone network should be advertised into the transit areas in
        a separate summary link advertisement, regardless of the
        backbone's configured area address ranges.  See Section 12.4.3
        for more information.

    o   The time between link state retransmissions, RxmtInterval, is
        configured for a virtual link.  This should be well over the
        expected round-trip delay between the two routers.  This may be
        hard to estimate for a virtual link; it is better to err on the
        side of making it too large.


16.  Calculation Of The Routing Table

    This section details the OSPF routing table calculation.  Using its
    attached areas' link state databases as input, a router runs the
    following algorithm, building its routing table step by step.  At
    each step, the router must access individual pieces of the link
    state databases (e.g., a router links advertisement originated by a
    certain router).  This access is performed by the lookup function
    discussed in Section 12.2.  The lookup process may return a link
    state advertisement whose LS age is equal to MaxAge.  Such an
    advertisement should not be used in the routing table calculation,
    and is treated just as if the lookup process had failed.

    The OSPF routing table's organization is explained in Section 11.
    Two examples of the routing table build process are presented in
    Sections 11.2 and 11.3.  This process can be broken into the
    following steps:


    (1) The present routing table is invalidated.  The routing table is
        built again from scratch.  The old routing table is saved so
        that changes in routing table entries can be identified.




Moy                                                           [Page 142]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    (2) The intra-area routes are calculated by building the shortest-
        path tree for each attached area.  In particular, all routing
        table entries whose Destination Type is "area border router" are
        calculated in this step.  This step is described in two parts.
        At first the tree is constructed by only considering those links
        between routers and transit networks.  Then the stub networks
        are incorporated into the tree. During the area's shortest-path
        tree calculation, the area's TransitCapability is also
        calculated for later use in Step 4.

    (3) The inter-area routes are calculated, through examination of
        summary link advertisements.  If the router is attached to
        multiple areas (i.e., it is an area border router), only
        backbone summary link advertisements are examined.

    (4) In area border routers connecting to one or more transit areas
        (i.e, non-backbone areas whose TransitCapability is found to be
        TRUE), the transit areas' summary link advertisements are
        examined to see whether better paths exist using the transit
        areas than were found in Steps 2-3 above.

    (5) Routes to external destinations are calculated, through
        examination of AS external link advertisements.  The locations
        of the AS boundary routers (which originate the AS external link
        advertisements) have been determined in steps 2-4.


    Steps 2-5 are explained in further detail below.  The explanations
    describe the calculations for TOS 0 only.  It may also be necessary
    to perform each step (separately) for each of the non-zero TOS
    values.[20] For more information concerning the building of non-zero
    TOS routes see Section 16.9.

    Changes made to routing table entries as a result of these
    calculations can cause the OSPF protocol to take further actions.
    For example, a change to an intra-area route will cause an area
    border router to originate new summary link advertisements (see
    Section 12.4).  See Section 16.7 for a complete list of the OSPF
    protocol actions resulting from routing table changes.


    16.1.  Calculating the shortest-path tree for an area

        This calculation yields the set of intra-area routes associated
        with an area (called hereafter Area A).  A router calculates the
        shortest-path tree using itself as the root.[21] The formation
        of the shortest path tree is done here in two stages.  In the
        first stage, only links between routers and transit networks are



Moy                                                           [Page 143]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        considered.  Using the Dijkstra algorithm, a tree is formed from
        this subset of the link state database.  In the second stage,
        leaves are added to the tree by considering the links to stub
        networks.

        The procedure will be explained using the graph terminology that
        was introduced in Section 2.  The area's link state database is
        represented as a directed graph.  The graph's vertices are
        routers, transit networks and stub networks.  The first stage of
        the procedure concerns only the transit vertices (routers and
        transit networks) and their connecting links.  Throughout the
        shortest path calculation, the following data is also associated
        with each transit vertex:


        Vertex (node) ID
            A 32-bit number uniquely identifying the vertex.  For router
            vertices this is the router's OSPF Router ID.  For network
            vertices, this is the IP address of the network's Designated
            Router.

        A link state advertisement
            Each transit vertex has an associated link state
            advertisement.  For router vertices, this is a router links
            advertisement.  For transit networks, this is a network
            links advertisement (which is actually originated by the
            network's Designated Router).  In any case, the
            advertisement's Link State ID is always equal to the above
            Vertex ID.

        List of next hops
            The list of next hops for the current set of shortest paths
            from the root to this vertex.  There can be multiple
            shortest paths due to the equal-cost multipath capability.
            Each next hop indicates the outgoing router interface to use
            when forwarding traffic to the destination.  On multi-access
            networks, the next hop also includes the IP address of the
            next router (if any) in the path towards the destination.

        Distance from root
            The link state cost of the current set of shortest paths
            from the root to the vertex.  The link state cost of a path
            is calculated as the sum of the costs of the path's
            constituent links (as advertised in router links and network
            links advertisements).  One path is said to be "shorter"
            than another if it has a smaller link state cost.





Moy                                                           [Page 144]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        The first stage of the procedure (i.e., the Dijkstra algorithm)
        can now be summarized as follows. At each iteration of the
        algorithm, there is a list of candidate vertices.  Paths from
        the root to these vertices have been found, but not necessarily
        the shortest ones.  However, the paths to the candidate vertex
        that is closest to the root are guaranteed to be shortest; this
        vertex is added to the shortest-path tree, removed from the
        candidate list, and its adjacent vertices are examined for
        possible addition to/modification of the candidate list.  The
        algorithm then iterates again.  It terminates when the candidate
        list becomes empty.

        The following steps describe the algorithm in detail.  Remember
        that we are computing the shortest path tree for Area A.  All
        references to link state database lookup below are from Area A's
        database.


        (1) Initialize the algorithm's data structures.  Clear the list
            of candidate vertices.  Initialize the shortest-path tree to
            only the root (which is the router doing the calculation).
            Set Area A's TransitCapability to FALSE.

        (2) Call the vertex just added to the tree vertex V.  Examine
            the link state advertisement associated with vertex V.  This
            is a lookup in the Area A's link state database based on the
            Vertex ID.  If this is a router links advertisement, and bit
            V of the router links advertisement (see Section A.4.2) is
            set, set Area A's TransitCapability to TRUE.  In any case,
            each link described by the advertisement gives the cost to
            an adjacent vertex.  For each described link, (say it joins
            vertex V to vertex W):

            (a) If this is a link to a stub network, examine the next
                link in V's advertisement.  Links to stub networks will
                be considered in the second stage of the shortest path
                calculation.

            (b) Otherwise, W is a transit vertex (router or transit
                network).  Look up the vertex W's link state
                advertisement (router links or network links) in Area
                A's link state database.  If the advertisement does not
                exist, or its LS age is equal to MaxAge, or it does not
                have a link back to vertex V, examine the next link in
                V's advertisement.[22]

            (c) If vertex W is already on the shortest-path tree,
                examine the next link in the advertisement.



Moy                                                           [Page 145]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            (d) Calculate the link state cost D of the resulting path
                from the root to vertex W.  D is equal to the sum of the
                link state cost of the (already calculated) shortest
                path to vertex V and the advertised cost of the link
                between vertices V and W.  If D is:

                o   Greater than the value that already appears for
                    vertex W on the candidate list, then examine the
                    next link.

                o   Equal to the value that appears for vertex W on the
                    candidate list, calculate the set of next hops that
                    result from using the advertised link.  Input to
                    this calculation is the destination (W), and its
                    parent (V).  This calculation is shown in Section
                    16.1.1.  This set of hops should be added to the
                    next hop values that appear for W on the candidate
                    list.

                o   Less than the value that appears for vertex W on the
                    candidate list, or if W does not yet appear on the
                    candidate list, then set the entry for W on the
                    candidate list to indicate a distance of D from the
                    root.  Also calculate the list of next hops that
                    result from using the advertised link, setting the
                    next hop values for W accordingly.  The next hop
                    calculation is described in Section 16.1.1; it takes
                    as input the destination (W) and its parent (V).

        (3) If at this step the candidate list is empty, the shortest-
            path tree (of transit vertices) has been completely built
            and this stage of the procedure terminates.  Otherwise,
            choose the vertex belonging to the candidate list that is
            closest to the root, and add it to the shortest-path tree
            (removing it from the candidate list in the process). Note
            that when there is a choice of vertices closest to the root,
            network vertices must be chosen before router vertices in
            order to necessarily find all equal-cost paths. This is
            consistent with the tie-breakers that were introduced in the
            modified Dijkstra algorithm used by OSPF's Multicast routing
            extensions (MOSPF).

        (4) Possibly modify the routing table.  For those routing table
            entries modified, the associated area will be set to Area A,
            the path type will be set to intra-area, and the cost will
            be set to the newly discovered shortest path's calculated
            distance.




Moy                                                           [Page 146]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            If the newly added vertex is an area border router (call it
            ABR), a routing table entry is added whose destination type
            is "area border router". The Options field found in the
            associated router links advertisement is copied into the
            routing table entry's Optional capabilities field. If in
            addition ABR is the endpoint of one of the calculating
            router's configured virtual links that uses Area A as its
            Transit area: the virtual link is declared up, the IP
            address of the virtual interface is set to the IP address of
            the outgoing interface calculated above for ABR, and the
            virtual neighbor's IP address is set to the ABR interface
            address (contained in ABR's router links advertisement) that
            points back to the root of the shortest-path tree;
            equivalently, this is the interface that points back to
            ABR's parent vertex on the shortest-path tree (similar to
            the calculation in Section 16.1.1).

            If the newly added vertex is an AS boundary router, the
            routing table entry of type "AS boundary router" for the
            destination is located.  Since routers can belong to more
            than one area, it is possible that several sets of intra-
            area paths exist to the AS boundary router, each set using a
            different area.  However, the AS boundary router's routing
            table entry must indicate a set of paths which utilize a
            single area.  The area leading to the routing table entry is
            selected as follows: The area providing the shortest path is
            always chosen; if more than one area provides paths with the
            same minimum cost, the area with the largest OSPF Area ID
            (when considered as an unsigned 32-bit integer) is chosen.
            Note that whenever an AS boundary router's routing table
            entry is added/modified, the Options found in the associated
            router links advertisement is copied into the routing table
            entry's Optional capabilities field.

            If the newly added vertex is a transit network, the routing
            table entry for the network is located.  The entry's
            Destination ID is the IP network number, which can be
            obtained by masking the Vertex ID (Link State ID) with its
            associated subnet mask (found in the body of the associated
            network links advertisement).  If the routing table entry
            already exists (i.e., there is already an intra-area route
            to the destination installed in the routing table), multiple
            vertices have mapped to the same IP network.  For example,
            this can occur when a new Designated Router is being
            established.  In this case, the current routing table entry
            should be overwritten if and only if the newly found path is
            just as short and the current routing table entry's Link
            State Origin has a smaller Link State ID than the newly



Moy                                                           [Page 147]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            added vertex' link state advertisement.

            If there is no routing table entry for the network (the
            usual case), a routing table entry for the IP network should
            be added.  The routing table entry's Link State Origin
            should be set to the newly added vertex' link state
            advertisement.

        (5) Iterate the algorithm by returning to Step 2.


        The stub networks are added to the tree in the procedure's
        second stage.  In this stage, all router vertices are again
        examined.  Those that have been determined to be unreachable in
        the above first phase are discarded.  For each reachable router
        vertex (call it V), the associated router links advertisement is
        found in the link state database.  Each stub network link
        appearing in the advertisement is then examined, and the
        following steps are executed:


        (1) Calculate the distance D of stub network from the root.  D
            is equal to the distance from the root to the router vertex
            (calculated in stage 1), plus the stub network link's
            advertised cost.  Compare this distance to the current best
            cost to the stub network.  This is done by looking up the
            stub network's current routing table entry.  If the
            calculated distance D is larger, go on to examine the next
            stub network link in the advertisement.

        (2) If this step is reached, the stub network's routing table
            entry must be updated.  Calculate the set of next hops that
            would result from using the stub network link.  This
            calculation is shown in Section 16.1.1; input to this
            calculation is the destination (the stub network) and the
            parent vertex (the router vertex).  If the distance D is the
            same as the current routing table cost, simply add this set
            of next hops to the routing table entry's list of next hops.
            In this case, the routing table already has a Link State
            Origin.  If this Link State Origin is a router links
            advertisement whose Link State ID is smaller than V's Router
            ID, reset the Link State Origin to V's router links
            advertisement.

            Otherwise D is smaller than the routing table cost.
            Overwrite the current routing table entry by setting the
            routing table entry's cost to D, and by setting the entry's
            list of next hops to the newly calculated set.  Set the



Moy                                                           [Page 148]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            routing table entry's Link State Origin to V's router links
            advertisement.  Then go on to examine the next stub network
            link.


        For all routing table entries added/modified in the second
        stage, the associated area will be set to Area A and the path
        type will be set to intra-area.  When the list of reachable
        router links is exhausted, the second stage is completed.  At
        this time, all intra-area routes associated with Area A have
        been determined.

        The specification does not require that the above two stage
        method be used to calculate the shortest path tree.  However, if
        another algorithm is used, an identical tree must be produced.
        For this reason, it is important to note that links between
        transit vertices must be bidirectional in ordered to be included
        in the above tree.  It should also be mentioned that more
        efficient algorithms exist for calculating the tree; for
        example, the incremental SPF algorithm described in [BBN].


        16.1.1.  The next hop calculation

            This section explains how to calculate the current set of
            next hops to use for a destination.  Each next hop consists
            of the outgoing interface to use in forwarding packets to
            the destination together with the next hop router (if any).
            The next hop calculation is invoked each time a shorter path
            to the destination is discovered.  This can happen in either
            stage of the shortest-path tree calculation (see Section
            16.1).  In stage 1 of the shortest-path tree calculation a
            shorter path is found as the destination is added to the
            candidate list, or when the destination's entry on the
            candidate list is modified (Step 2d of Stage 1).  In stage 2
            a shorter path is discovered each time the destination's
            routing table entry is modified (Step 2 of Stage 2).

            The set of next hops to use for the destination may be
            recalculated several times during the shortest-path tree
            calculation, as shorter and shorter paths are discovered.
            In the end, the destination's routing table entry will
            always reflect the next hops resulting from the absolute
            shortest path(s).

            Input to the next hop calculation is a) the destination and
            b) its parent in the current shortest path between the root
            (the calculating router) and the destination.  The parent is



Moy                                                           [Page 149]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            always a transit vertex (i.e., always a router or a transit
            network).

            If there is at least one intervening router in the current
            shortest path between the destination and the root, the
            destination simply inherits the set of next hops from the
            parent.  Otherwise, there are two cases.  In the first case,
            the parent vertex is the root (the calculating router
            itself).  This means that the destination is either a
            directly connected network or directly connected router.
            The next hop in this case is simply the OSPF interface
            connecting to the network/router; no next hop router is
            required. If the connecting OSPF interface in this case is a
            virtual link, the setting of the next hop should be deferred
            until the calculation in Section 16.3.

            In the second case, the parent vertex is a network that
            directly connects the calculating router to the destination
            router.  The list of next hops is then determined by
            examining the destination's router links advertisement.  For
            each link in the advertisement that points back to the
            parent network, the link's Link Data field provides the IP
            address of a next hop router.  The outgoing interface to use
            can then be derived from the next hop IP address (or it can
            be inherited from the parent network).


    16.2.  Calculating the inter-area routes

        The inter-area routes are calculated by examining summary link
        advertisements.  If the router has active attachments to
        multiple areas, only backbone summary link advertisements are
        examined.  Routers attached to a single area examine that area's
        summary links.  In either case, the summary links examined below
        are all part of a single area's link state database (call it
        Area A).

        Summary link advertisements are originated by the area border
        routers.  Each summary link advertisement in Area A is
        considered in turn.  Remember that the destination described by
        a summary link advertisement is either a network (Type 3 summary
        link advertisements) or an AS boundary router (Type 4 summary
        link advertisements).  For each summary link advertisement:


        (1) If the cost specified by the advertisement is LSInfinity, or
            if the advertisement's LS age is equal to MaxAge, then
            examine the the next advertisement.



Moy                                                           [Page 150]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        (2) If the advertisement was originated by the calculating
            router itself, examine the next advertisement.

        (3) If the collection of destinations described by the summary
            link advertisement falls into one of the router's configured
            area address ranges (see Section 3.5) and the particular
            area address range is active, the summary link advertisement
            should be ignored.  Active means that there are one or more
            reachable (by intra-area paths) networks contained in the
            area range.  In this case, all addresses in the area range
            are assumed to be either reachable via intra-area paths, or
            else to be unreachable by any other means.

        (4) Else, call the destination described by the advertisement N
            (for Type 3 summary links, N's address is obtained by
            masking the advertisement's Link State ID with the
            network/subnet mask contained in the body of the
            advertisement), and the area border originating the
            advertisement BR.  Look up the routing table entry for BR
            having Area A as its associated area.  If no such entry
            exists for router BR (i.e., BR is unreachable in Area A), do
            nothing with this advertisement and consider the next in the
            list.  Else, this advertisement describes an inter-area path
            to destination N, whose cost is the distance to BR plus the
            cost specified in the advertisement. Call the cost of this
            inter-area path IAC.

        (5) Next, look up the routing table entry for the destination N.
            (The entry's Destination Type is either Network or AS
            boundary router.)  If no entry exists for N or if the
            entry's path type is "type 1 external" or "type 2 external",
            then install the inter-area path to N, with associated area
            Area A, cost IAC, next hop equal to the list of next hops to
            router BR, and Advertising router equal to BR.

        (6) Else, if the paths present in the table are intra-area
            paths, do nothing with the advertisement (intra-area paths
            are always preferred).

        (7) Else, the paths present in the routing table are also
            inter-area paths.  Install the new path through BR if it is
            cheaper, overriding the paths in the routing table.
            Otherwise, if the new path is the same cost, add it to the
            list of paths that appear in the routing table entry.







Moy                                                           [Page 151]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    16.3.  Examining transit areas' summary links

        This step is only performed by area border routers attached to
        one or more transit areas. Transit areas are those areas
        supporting one or more virtual links; their TransitCapability
        parameter has been set to TRUE in Step 2 of the Dijkstra
        algorithm (see Section 16.1). They are the only non-backbone
        areas that can carry data traffic that neither originates nor
        terminates in the area itself.

        The purpose of the calculation below is to examine the transit
        areas to see whether they provide any better (shorter) paths
        than the paths previously calculated in Sections 16.1 and 16.2.
        Any paths found that are better than or equal to previously
        discovered paths are installed in the routing table.

        The calculation proceeds as follows. All the transit areas'
        summary link advertisements are examined in turn.  Each such
        summary link advertisement describes a route through a transit
        area Area A to a Network N (N's address is obtained by masking
        the advertisement's Link State ID with the network/subnet mask
        contained in the body of the advertisement) or in the case of a
        Type 4 summary link advertisement, to an AS boundary router N.
        Suppose also that the summary link advertisement was originated
        by an area border router BR.

        (1) If the cost advertised by the summary link advertisement is
            LSInfinity, or if the advertisement's LS age is equal to
            MaxAge, then examine the next advertisement.

        (2) If the summary link advertisement was originated by the
            calculating router itself, examine the next advertisement.

        (3) Look up the routing table entry for N. If it does not exist,
            or if the route type is other than intra-area or inter-area,
            or if the area associated with the routing table entry is
            not the backbone area, then examine the next advertisement.
            In other words, this calculation only updates backbone
            intra-area routes found in Section 16.1 and inter-area
            routes found in Section 16.2.

        (4) Look up the routing table entry for the advertising router
            BR associated with the Area A. If it is unreachable, examine
            the next advertisement. Otherwise, the cost to destination N
            is the sum of the cost in BR's Area A routing table entry
            and the cost advertised in the advertisement. Call this cost
            IAC.




Moy                                                           [Page 152]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        (5) If this cost is less than the cost occurring in N's routing
            table entry, overwrite N's list of next hops with those used
            for BR, and set N's routing table cost to IAC. Else, if IAC
            is the same as N's current cost, add BR's list of next hops
            to N's list of next hops. In any case, the area associated
            with N's routing table entry must remain the backbone area,
            and the path type (either intra-area or inter-area) must
            also remain the same.

        It is important to note that the above calculation never makes
        unreachable destinations reachable, but instead just potentially
        finds better paths to already reachable destinations. Also,
        unlike Section 16.3 of [RFC 1247], the above calculation
        installs any better cost found into the routing table entry,
        from which it may be readvertised in summary link advertisements
        to other areas.

        As an example of the calculation, consider the Autonomous System
        pictured in Figure 17.  There is a single non-backbone area
        (Area 1) that physically divides the backbone into two separate
        pieces. To maintain connectivity of the backbone, a virtual link
        has been configured between routers RT1 and RT4. On the right
        side of the figure, Network N1 belongs to the backbone. The
        dotted lines indicate that there is a much shorter intra-area

                      ........................
                      . Area 1 (transit)     .            +
                      .                      .            |
                      .      +---+1        1+---+100      |
                      .      |RT2|----------|RT4|=========|
                      .    1/+---+********* +---+         |
                      .    /*******          .            |
                      .  1/*Virtual          .            |
                   1+---+/*  Link            .         Net|work
             =======|RT1|*                   .            | N1
                    +---+\                   .            |
                      .   \                  .            |
                      .    \                 .            |
                      .    1\+---+1        1+---+20       |
                      .      |RT3|----------|RT5|=========|
                      .      +---+          +---+         |
                      .                      .            |
                      ........................            +


                    Figure 17: Routing through transit areas





Moy                                                           [Page 153]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        backbone path between router RT5 and Network N1 (cost 20) than
        there is between Router RT4 and Network N1 (cost 100). Both
        Router RT4 and Router RT5 will inject summary link
        advertisements for Network N1 into Area 1.

        After the shortest-path tree has been calculated for the
        backbone in Section 16.1, Router RT1 (left end of the virtual
        link) will have calculated a path through Router RT4 for all
        data traffic destined for Network N1. However, since Router RT5
        is so much closer to Network N1, all routers internal to Area 1
        (e.g., Routers RT2 and RT3) will forward their Network N1
        traffic towards Router RT5, instead of RT4. And indeed, after
        examining Area 1's summary link advertisements by the above
        calculation, Router RT1 will also forward Network N1 traffic
        towards RT5. Note that in this example the virtual link enables
        Network N1 traffic to be forwarded through the transit area Area
        1, but the actual path the data traffic takes does not follow
        the virtual link.  In other words, virtual links allow transit
        traffic to be forwarded through an area, but do not dictate the
        precise path that the traffic will take.

    16.4.  Calculating AS external routes

        AS external routes are calculated by examining AS external link
        advertisements.  Each of the AS external link advertisements is
        considered in turn.  Most AS external link advertisements
        describe routes to specific IP destinations.  An AS external
        link advertisement can also describe a default route for the
        Autonomous System (Destination ID = DefaultDestination,
        network/subnet mask = 0x00000000).  For each AS external link
        advertisement:


        (1) If the cost specified by the advertisement is LSInfinity, or
            if the advertisement's LS age is equal to MaxAge, then
            examine the next advertisement.

        (2) If the advertisement was originated by the calculating
            router itself, examine the next advertisement.

        (3) Call the destination described by the advertisement N.  N's
            address is obtained by masking the advertisement's Link
            State ID with the network/subnet mask contained in the body
            of the advertisement.  Look up the routing table entry for
            the AS boundary router (ASBR) that originated the
            advertisement. If no entry exists for router ASBR (i.e.,
            ASBR is unreachable), do nothing with this advertisement and
            consider the next in the list.



Moy                                                           [Page 154]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            Else, this advertisement describes an AS external path to
            destination N.  Examine the forwarding address specified in
            the AS external link advertisement.  This indicates the IP
            address to which packets for the destination should be
            forwarded.  If the forwarding address is set to 0.0.0.0,
            packets should be sent to the ASBR itself.  Otherwise, look
            up the forwarding address in the routing table.[23] An
            intra-area or inter-area path must exist to the forwarding
            address.  If no such path exists, do nothing with the
            advertisement and consider the next in the list.

            Call the routing table distance to the forwarding address X
            (when the forwarding address is set to 0.0.0.0, this is the
            distance to the ASBR itself), and the cost specified in the
            advertisement Y.  X is in terms of the link state metric,
            and Y is a type 1 or 2 external metric.

        (4) Next, look up the routing table entry for the destination N.
            If no entry exists for N, install the AS external path to N,
            with next hop equal to the list of next hops to the
            forwarding address, and advertising router equal to ASBR.
            If the external metric type is 1, then the path-type is set
            to type 1 external and the cost is equal to X+Y.  If the
            external metric type is 2, the path-type is set to type 2
            external, the link state component of the route's cost is X,
            and the type 2 cost is Y.

        (5) Else, if the paths present in the table are not type 1 or
            type 2 external paths, do nothing (AS external paths have
            the lowest priority).

        (6) Otherwise, compare the cost of this new AS external path to
            the ones present in the table.  Type 1 external paths are
            always shorter than type 2 external paths.  Type 1 external
            paths are compared by looking at the sum of the distance to
            the forwarding address and the advertised type 1 metric
            (X+Y).  Type 2 external paths are compared by looking at the
            advertised type 2 metrics, and then if necessary, the
            distance to the forwarding addresses.

            If the new path is shorter, it replaces the present paths in
            the routing table entry.  If the new path is the same cost,
            it is added to the routing table entry's list of paths.








Moy                                                           [Page 155]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    16.5.  Incremental updates -- summary link advertisements

        When a new summary link advertisement is received, it is not
        necessary to recalculate the entire routing table.  Call the
        destination described by the summary link advertisement N (N's
        address is obtained by masking the advertisement's Link State ID
        with the network/subnet mask contained in the body of the
        advertisement), and let Area A be the area to which the
        advertisement belongs. There are then two separate cases:

        Case 1: Area A is the backbone and/or the router is not an area
            border router.
            In this case, the following calculations must be performed.
            First, if there is presently an inter-area route to the
            destination N, N's routing table entry is invalidated,
            saving the entry's values for later comparisons. Then the
            calculation in Section 16.2 is run again for the single
            destination N. In this calculation, all of Area A's summary
            link advertisements that describe a route to N are examined.
            In addition, if the router is an area border router attached
            to one or more transit areas, the calculation in Section
            16.3 must be run again for the single destination.  If the
            results of these calculations have changed the cost/path to
            an AS boundary router (as would be the case for a Type 4
            summary link advertisement) or to any forwarding addresses,
            all AS external link advertisements will have to be
            reexamined by rerunning the calculation in Section 16.4.
            Otherwise, if N is now newly unreachable, the calculation in
            Section 16.4 must be rerun for the single destination N, in
            case an alternate external route to N exists.

        Case 2: Area A is a transit area and the router is an area
            border router.
            In this case, the following calculations must be performed.
            First, if N's routing table entry presently contains one or
            more inter-area paths that utilize the transit area Area A,
            these paths should be removed. If this removes all paths
            from the routing table entry, the entry should be
            invalidated.  The entry's old values should be saved for
            later comparisons. Next the calculation in Section 16.3 must
            be run again for the single destination N. If the results of
            this calculation have caused the cost to N to increase, the
            complete routing table calculation must be rerun starting
            with the Dijkstra algorithm specified in Section 16.1.
            Otherwise, if the cost/path to an AS boundary router (as
            would be the case for a Type 4 summary link advertisement)
            or to any forwarding addresses has changed, all AS external
            link advertisements will have to be reexamined by rerunning



Moy                                                           [Page 156]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            the calculation in Section 16.4.  Otherwise, if N is now
            newly unreachable, the calculation in Section 16.4 must be
            rerun for the single destination N, in case an alternate
            external route to N exists.

    16.6.  Incremental updates -- AS external link advertisements

        When a new AS external link advertisement is received, it is not
        necessary to recalculate the entire routing table.  Call the
        destination described by the AS external link advertisement N.
        N's address is obtained by masking the advertisement's Link
        State ID with the network/subnet mask contained in the body of
        the advertisement. If there is already an intra-area or inter-
        area route to the destination, no recalculation is necessary
        (internal routes take precedence).

        Otherwise, the procedure in Section 16.4 will have to be
        performed, but only for those AS external link advertisements
        whose destination is N.  Before this procedure is performed, the
        present routing table entry for N should be invalidated.


    16.7.  Events generated as a result of routing table changes

        Changes to routing table entries sometimes cause the OSPF area
        border routers to take additional actions.  These routers need
        to act on the following routing table changes:


        o   The cost or path type of a routing table entry has changed.
            If the destination described by this entry is a Network or
            AS boundary router, and this is not simply a change of AS
            external routes, new summary link advertisements may have to
            be generated (potentially one for each attached area,
            including the backbone).  See Section 12.4.3 for more
            information.  If a previously advertised entry has been
            deleted, or is no longer advertisable to a particular area,
            the advertisement must be flushed from the routing domain by
            setting its LS age to MaxAge and reflooding (see Section
            14.1).

        o   A routing table entry associated with a configured virtual
            link has changed.  The destination of such a routing table
            entry is an area border router.  The change indicates a
            modification to the virtual link's cost or viability.

            If the entry indicates that the area border router is newly
            reachable (via TOS 0), the corresponding virtual link is now



Moy                                                           [Page 157]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            operational.  An InterfaceUp event should be generated for
            the virtual link, which will cause a virtual adjacency to
            begin to form (see Section 10.3).  At this time the virtual
            link's IP interface address and the virtual neighbor's
            Neighbor IP address are also calculated.

            If the entry indicates that the area border router is no
            longer reachable (via TOS 0), the virtual link and its
            associated adjacency should be destroyed.  This means an
            InterfaceDown event should be generated for the associated
            virtual link.

            If the cost of the entry has changed, and there is a fully
            established virtual adjacency, a new router links
            advertisement for the backbone must be originated.  This in
            turn may cause further routing table changes.


    16.8.  Equal-cost multipath

        The OSPF protocol maintains multiple equal-cost routes to all
        destinations.  This can be seen in the steps used above to
        calculate the routing table, and in the definition of the
        routing table structure.

        Each one of the multiple routes will be of the same type
        (intra-area, inter-area, type 1 external or type 2 external),
        cost, and will have the same associated area.  However, each
        route specifies a separate next hop and Advertising router.

        There is no requirement that a router running OSPF keep track of
        all possible equal-cost routes to a destination.  An
        implementation may choose to keep only a fixed number of routes
        to any given destination.  This does not affect any of the
        algorithms presented in this specification.


    16.9.  Building the non-zero-TOS portion of the routing table

        The OSPF protocol can calculate a different set of routes for
        each IP TOS (see Section 2.4).  Support for TOS-based routing is
        optional.  TOS-capable and non-TOS-capable routers can be mixed
        in an OSPF routing domain.  Routers not supporting TOS calculate
        only the TOS 0 route to each destination.  These routes are then
        used to forward all data traffic, regardless of the TOS
        indications in the data packet's IP header.  A router that does
        not support TOS indicates this fact to the other OSPF routers by
        clearing the T-bit in the Options field of its router links



Moy                                                           [Page 158]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        advertisement.

        The above sections detailing the routing table calculations
        handle the TOS 0 case only.  In general, for routers supporting
        TOS-based routing, each piece of the routing table calculation
        must be rerun separately for the non-zero TOS values.  When
        calculating routes for TOS X, only TOS X metrics can be used.
        Any link state advertisement may specify a separate cost for
        each TOS (a cost for TOS 0 must always be specified).  The
        encoding of TOS in OSPF link state advertisements is described
        in Section 12.3.

        An advertisement can specify that it is restricted to TOS 0
        (i.e., non-zero TOS is not handled) by clearing the T-bit in the
        link state advertisement's Option field.  Such advertisements
        are not used when calculating routes for non-zero TOS.  For this
        reason, it is possible that a destination is unreachable for
        some non-zero TOS.  In this case, the TOS 0 path is used when
        forwarding packets (see Section 11.1).

        The following lists the modifications needed when running the
        routing table calculation for a non-zero TOS value (called TOS
        X).  In general, routers and advertisements that do not support
        TOS are omitted from the calculation.


        Calculating the shortest-path tree (Section  16.1).
            Routers that do not support TOS-based routing should be
            omitted from the shortest-path tree calculation.  These
            routers are identified as those having the T-bit reset in
            the Options field of their router links advertisements.
            Such routers should never be added to the Dijktra
            algorithm's candidate list, nor should their router links
            advertisements be examined when adding the stub networks to
            the tree.  In particular, if the T-bit is reset in the
            calculating router's own router links advertisement, it does
            not run the shortest-path tree calculation for non-zero TOS
            values.

        Calculating the inter-area routes (Section  16.2).
            Inter-area paths are the concatenation of a path to an area
            border router with a summary link.  When calculating TOS X
            routes, both path components must also specify TOS X.  In
            other words, only TOS X paths to the area border router are
            examined, and the area border router must be advertising a
            TOS X route to the destination.  Note that this means that
            summary link advertisements having the T-bit reset in their
            Options field are not considered.



Moy                                                           [Page 159]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        Examining transit areas' summary links (Section 16.3).
            This calculation again considers the concatenation of a path
            to an area border router with a summary link.  As with
            inter-area routes, only TOS X paths to the area border
            router are examined, and the area border router must be
            advertising a TOS X route to the destination.

        Calculating AS external routes (Section 16.4).
            This calculation considers the concatenation of a path to a
            forwarding address with an AS external link.  Only TOS X
            paths to the forwarding address are examined, and the AS
            boundary router must be advertising a TOS X route to the
            destination.  Note that this means that AS external link
            advertisements having the T-bit reset in their Options field
            are not considered.

            In addition, the advertising AS boundary router must also be
            reachable for its advertisements to be considered (see
            Section 16.4).  However, if the advertising router and the
            forwarding address are not one in the same, the advertising
            router need only be reachable via TOS 0.






























Moy                                                           [Page 160]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


Footnotes


    [1]The graph's vertices represent either routers, transit networks,
    or stub networks.  Since routers may belong to multiple areas, it is
    not possible to color the graph's vertices.

    [2]It is possible for all of a router's interfaces to be unnumbered
    point-to-point links.  In this case, an IP address must be assigned
    to the router.  This address will then be advertised in the router's
    router links advertisement as a host route.

    [3]Note that in these cases both interfaces, the non-virtual and the
    virtual, would have the same IP address.

    [4]Note that no host route is generated for, and no IP packets can
    be addressed to, interfaces to unnumbered point-to-point networks.
    This is regardless of such an interface's state.

    [5]It is instructive to see what happens when the Designated Router
    for the network crashes.  Call the Designated Router for the network
    RT1, and the Backup Designated Router RT2.  If Router RT1 crashes
    (or maybe its interface to the network dies), the other routers on
    the network will detect RT1's absence within RouterDeadInterval
    seconds.  All routers may not detect this at precisely the same
    time; the routers that detect RT1's absence before RT2 does will,
    for a time, select RT2 to be both Designated Router and Backup
    Designated Router.  When RT2 detects that RT1 is gone it will move
    itself to Designated Router.  At this time, the remaining router
    having highest Router Priority will be selected as Backup Designated
    Router.

    [6]On point-to-point networks, the lower level protocols indicate
    whether the neighbor is up and running.  Likewise, existence of the
    neighbor on virtual links is indicated by the routing table
    calculation.  However, in both these cases, the Hello Protocol is
    still used.  This ensures that communication between the neighbors
    is bidirectional, and that each of the neighbors has a functioning
    routing protocol layer.

    [7]When the identity of the Designated Router is changing, it may be
    quite common for a neighbor in this state to send the router a
    Database Description packet; this means that there is some momentary
    disagreement on the Designated Router's identity.

    [8]Note that it is possible for a router to resynchronize any of its
    fully established adjacencies by setting the adjacency's state back
    to ExStart.  This will cause the other end of the adjacency to



Moy                                                           [Page 161]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    process a SeqNumberMismatch event, and therefore to also go back to
    ExStart state.

    [9]The address space of IP networks and the address space of OSPF
    Router IDs may overlap.  That is, a network may have an IP address
    which is identical (when considered as a 32-bit number) to some
    router's Router ID.

    [10]It is assumed that, for two different address ranges matching
    the destination, one range is more specific than the other. Non-
    contiguous subnet masks can be configured to violate this
    assumption. Such subnet mask configurations cannot be handled by the
    OSPF protocol.

    [11]MaxAgeDiff is an architectural constant.  It indicates the
    maximum dispersion of ages, in seconds, that can occur for a single
    link state instance as it is flooded throughout the routing domain.
    If two advertisements differ by more than this, they are assumed to
    be different instances of the same advertisement.  This can occur
    when a router restarts and loses track of the advertisement's
    previous LS sequence number.  See Section 13.4 for more details.

    [12]When two advertisements have different LS checksums, they are
    assumed to be separate instances.  This can occur when a router
    restarts, and loses track of the advertisement's previous LS
    sequence number.  In the case where the two advertisements have the
    same LS sequence number, it is not possible to determine which link
    state is actually newer.  If the wrong advertisement is accepted as
    newer, the originating router will originate another instance.  See
    Section 13.4 for further details.

    [13]There is one instance where a lookup must be done based on
    partial information.  This is during the routing table calculation,
    when a network links advertisement must be found based solely on its
    Link State ID.  The lookup in this case is still well defined, since
    no two network links advertisements can have the same Link State ID.

    [14]This clause covers the case: Inter-area routes are not
    summarized to the backbone.  This is because inter-area routes are
    always associated with the backbone area.

    [15]This clause is only invoked when Area A is a Transit area
    supporting one or more virtual links. For example, in the area
    configuration of Figure 6, Router RT11 need only originate a single
    summary link having the (collapsed) destination N9-N11,H1 into its
    connected Transit area Area 2, since all of its other eligible
    routes have next hops belonging to Area 2 (and as such only need be
    advertised by other area border routers; in this case, Routers RT10



Moy                                                           [Page 162]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    and RT7).

    [16]By keeping more information in the routing table, it is possible
    for an implementation to recalculate the shortest path tree only for
    a single area.  In fact, there are incremental algorithms that allow
    an implementation to recalculate only a portion of a single area's
    shortest path tree [BBN].  However, these algorithms are beyond the
    scope of this specification.

    [17]This is how the Link state request list is emptied, which
    eventually causes the neighbor state to transition to Full.  See
    Section 10.9 for more details.

    [18]It should be a relatively rare occurrence for an advertisement's
    LS age to reach MaxAge in this fashion.  Usually, the advertisement
    will be replaced by a more recent instance before it ages out.

    [19]Only the TOS 0 routes are important here because all OSPF
    protocol packets are sent with TOS = 0.  See Appendix A.

    [20]It may be the case that paths to certain destinations do not
    vary based on TOS.  For these destinations, the routing calculation
    need not be repeated for each TOS value.  In addition, there need
    only be a single routing table entry for these destinations (instead
    of a separate entry for each TOS value).

    [21]Strictly speaking, because of equal-cost multipath, the
    algorithm does not create a tree.  We continue to use the "tree"
    terminology because that is what occurs most often in the existing
    literature.

    [22]Note that the presence of any link back to V is sufficient; it
    need not be the matching half of the link under consideration from V
    to W. This is enough to ensure that, before data traffic flows
    between a pair of neighboring routers, their link state databases
    will be synchronized.

    [23]When the forwarding address is non-zero, it should point to a
    router belonging to another Autonomous System.  See Section 12.4.5
    for more details.











Moy                                                           [Page 163]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


References

    [BBN]           McQuillan, J., I. Richer and E. Rosen, "ARPANET
                    Routing Algorithm Improvements", BBN Technical
                    Report 3803, April 1978.

    [DEC]           Digital Equipment Corporation, "Information
                    processing systems -- Data communications --
                    Intermediate System to Intermediate System Intra-
                    Domain Routing Protocol", October 1987.

    [McQuillan]     McQuillan, J. et.al., "The New Routing Algorithm for
                    the Arpanet", IEEE Transactions on Communications,
                    May 1980.

    [Perlman]       Perlman, R., "Fault-Tolerant Broadcast of Routing
                    Information", Computer Networks, December 1983.

    [RFC 791]       Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791,
                    USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.

    [RFC 905]       McKenzie, A., "ISO Transport Protocol specification
                    ISO DP 8073", RFC 905, ISO, April 1984.

    [RFC 1112]      Deering, S., "Host extensions for IP multicasting",
                    STD 5, RFC 1112, Stanford University, May 1988.

    [RFC 1213]      McCloghrie, K., and M. Rose, "Management Information
                    Base for network management of TCP/IP-based
                    internets: MIB-II", STD 17, RFC 1213, Hughes LAN
                    Systems, Performance Systems International, March
                    1991.

    [RFC 1247]      Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", RFC 1247, Proteon, Inc.,
                    July 1991.

    [RFC 1519]      Fuller, V., T. Li, J. Yu, and K. Varadhan,
                    "Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): an Address
                    Assignment and Aggregation Strategy", RFC1519,
                    BARRNet, cisco, MERIT, OARnet, September 1993.

    [RFC 1340]      Reynolds, J., and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", STD
                    2, RFC 1340, USC/Information Sciences Institute,
                    July 1992.

    [RFC 1349]      Almquist, P., "Type of Service in the Internet
                    Protocol Suite", RFC 1349, July 1992.




Moy                                                           [Page 164]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    [RS-85-153]     Leiner, B., et.al., "The DARPA Internet Protocol
                    Suite", DDN Protocol Handbook, April 1985.

















































Moy                                                           [Page 165]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A. OSPF data formats

    This appendix describes the format of OSPF protocol packets and OSPF
    link state advertisements.  The OSPF protocol runs directly over the
    IP network layer.  Before any data formats are described, the
    details of the OSPF encapsulation are explained.

    Next the OSPF Options field is described.  This field describes
    various capabilities that may or may not be supported by pieces of
    the OSPF routing domain. The OSPF Options field is contained in OSPF
    Hello packets, Database Description packets and in OSPF link state
    advertisements.

    OSPF packet formats are detailed in Section A.3.  A description of
    OSPF link state advertisements appears in Section A.4.

A.1 Encapsulation of OSPF packets

    OSPF runs directly over the Internet Protocol's network layer.  OSPF
    packets are therefore encapsulated solely by IP and local data-link
    headers.

    OSPF does not define a way to fragment its protocol packets, and
    depends on IP fragmentation when transmitting packets larger than
    the network MTU.  The OSPF packet types that are likely to be large
    (Database Description Packets, Link State Request, Link State
    Update, and Link State Acknowledgment packets) can usually be split
    into several separate protocol packets, without loss of
    functionality.  This is recommended; IP fragmentation should be
    avoided whenever possible.  Using this reasoning, an attempt should
    be made to limit the sizes of packets sent over virtual links to 576
    bytes.  However, if necessary, the length of OSPF packets can be up
    to 65,535 bytes (including the IP header).

    The other important features of OSPF's IP encapsulation are:

    o   Use of IP multicast.  Some OSPF messages are multicast, when
        sent over multi-access networks.  Two distinct IP multicast
        addresses are used.  Packets sent to these multicast addresses
        should never be forwarded; they are meant to travel a single hop
        only.  To ensure that these packets will not travel multiple
        hops, their IP TTL must be set to 1.

        AllSPFRouters
            This multicast address has been assigned the value
            224.0.0.5.  All routers running OSPF should be prepared to
            receive packets sent to this address.  Hello packets are
            always sent to this destination.  Also, certain OSPF



Moy                                                           [Page 166]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            protocol packets are sent to this address during the
            flooding procedure.

        AllDRouters
            This multicast address has been assigned the value
            224.0.0.6.  Both the Designated Router and Backup Designated
            Router must be prepared to receive packets destined to this
            address.  Certain OSPF protocol packets are sent to this
            address during the flooding procedure.

    o   OSPF is IP protocol number 89.  This number has been registered
        with the Network Information Center.  IP protocol number
        assignments are documented in [RFC 1340].

    o   Routing protocol packets are sent with IP TOS of 0.  The OSPF
        protocol supports TOS-based routing.  Routes to any particular
        destination may vary based on TOS.  However, all OSPF routing
        protocol packets are sent using the normal service TOS value of
        binary 0000 defined in [RFC 1349].

    o   Routing protocol packets are sent with IP precedence set to
        Internetwork Control.  OSPF protocol packets should be given
        precedence over regular IP data traffic, in both sending and
        receiving.  Setting the IP precedence field in the IP header to
        Internetwork Control [RFC 791] may help implement this
        objective.

























Moy                                                           [Page 167]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A.2 The Options field

    The OSPF Options field is present in OSPF Hello packets, Database
    Description packets and all link state advertisements.  The Options
    field enables OSPF routers to support (or not support) optional
    capabilities, and to communicate their capability level to other
    OSPF routers.  Through this mechanism routers of differing
    capabilities can be mixed within an OSPF routing domain.

    When used in Hello packets, the Options field allows a router to
    reject a neighbor because of a capability mismatch.  Alternatively,
    when capabilities are exchanged in Database Description packets a
    router can choose not to forward certain link state advertisements
    to a neighbor because of its reduced functionality.  Lastly, listing
    capabilities in link state advertisements allows routers to route
    traffic around reduced functionality routers, by excluding them from
    parts of the routing table calculation.

    Two capabilities are currently defined.  For each capability, the
    effect of the capability's appearance (or lack of appearance) in
    Hello packets, Database Description packets and link state
    advertisements is specified below.  For example, the
    ExternalRoutingCapability (below called the E-bit) has meaning only
    in OSPF Hello Packets.  Routers should reset (i.e.  clear) the
    unassigned part of the capability field when sending Hello packets
    or Database Description packets and when originating link state
    advertisements.

    Additional capabilities may be assigned in the future.  Routers
    encountering unrecognized capabilities in received Hello Packets,
    Database Description packets or link state advertisements should
    ignore the capability and process the packet/advertisement normally.

                               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                               | | | | | | |E|T|
                               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                             The Options field


    T-bit
        This describes the router's TOS capability.  If the T-bit is
        reset, then the router supports only a single TOS (TOS 0).  Such
        a router is also said to be incapable of TOS-routing, and
        elsewhere in this document referred to as a TOS-0-only router.
        The absence of the T-bit in a router links advertisement causes
        the router to be skipped when building a non-zero TOS shortest-
        path tree (see Section 16.9).  In other words, routers incapable



Moy                                                           [Page 168]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        of TOS routing will be avoided as much as possible when
        forwarding data traffic requesting a non-zero TOS.  The absence
        of the T-bit in a summary link advertisement or an AS external
        link advertisement indicates that the advertisement is
        describing a TOS 0 route only (and not routes for non-zero TOS).

    E-bit
        This bit reflects the associated area's
        ExternalRoutingCapability.  AS external link advertisements are
        not flooded into/through OSPF stub areas (see Section 3.6).  The
        E-bit ensures that all members of a stub area agree on that
        area's configuration.  The E-bit is meaningful only in OSPF
        Hello packets.  When the E-bit is reset in the Hello packet sent
        out a particular interface, it means that the router will
        neither send nor receive AS external link state advertisements
        on that interface (in other words, the interface connects to a
        stub area).  Two routers will not become neighbors unless they
        agree on the state of the E-bit.

































Moy                                                           [Page 169]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A.3 OSPF Packet Formats

    There are five distinct OSPF packet types.  All OSPF packet types
    begin with a standard 24 byte header.  This header is described
    first.  Each packet type is then described in a succeeding section.
    In these sections each packet's division into fields is displayed,
    and then the field definitions are enumerated.

    All OSPF packet types (other than the OSPF Hello packets) deal with
    lists of link state advertisements.  For example, Link State Update
    packets implement the flooding of advertisements throughout the OSPF
    routing domain.  Because of this, OSPF protocol packets cannot be
    parsed unless the format of link state advertisements is also
    understood.  The format of Link state advertisements is described in
    Section A.4.

    The receive processing of OSPF packets is detailed in Section 8.2.
    The sending of OSPF packets is explained in Section 8.1.

































Moy                                                           [Page 170]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A.3.1 The OSPF packet header

    Every OSPF packet starts with a common 24 byte header.  This header
    contains all the necessary information to determine whether the
    packet should be accepted for further processing.  This
    determination is described in Section 8.2 of the specification.


        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |   Version #   |     Type      |         Packet length         |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                          Router ID                            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                           Area ID                             |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |           Checksum            |             AuType            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                       Authentication                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                       Authentication                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+



    Version #
        The OSPF version number.  This specification documents version 2
        of the protocol.

    Type
        The OSPF packet types are as follows.  The format of each of
        these packet types is described in a succeeding section.



                          Type   Description
                          ________________________________
                          1      Hello
                          2      Database Description
                          3      Link State Request
                          4      Link State Update
                          5      Link State Acknowledgment








Moy                                                           [Page 171]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    Packet length
        The length of the protocol packet in bytes.  This length
        includes the standard OSPF header.

    Router ID
        The Router ID of the packet's source.  In OSPF, the source and
        destination of a routing protocol packet are the two ends of an
        (potential) adjacency.

    Area ID
        A 32 bit number identifying the area that this packet belongs
        to.  All OSPF packets are associated with a single area.  Most
        travel a single hop only.  Packets travelling over a virtual
        link are labelled with the backbone Area ID of 0.0.0.0.

    Checksum
        The standard IP checksum of the entire contents of the packet,
        starting with the OSPF packet header but excluding the 64-bit
        authentication field.  This checksum is calculated as the 16-bit
        one's complement of the one's complement sum of all the 16-bit
        words in the packet, excepting the authentication field.  If the
        packet's length is not an integral number of 16-bit words, the
        packet is padded with a byte of zero before checksumming.

    AuType
        Identifies the authentication scheme to be used for the packet.
        Authentication is discussed in Appendix D of the specification.
        Consult Appendix D for a list of the currently defined
        authentication types.

    Authentication
        A 64-bit field for use by the authentication scheme.



















Moy                                                           [Page 172]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A.3.2 The Hello packet

    Hello packets are OSPF packet type 1.  These packets are sent
    periodically on all interfaces (including virtual links) in order to
    establish and maintain neighbor relationships.  In addition, Hello
    Packets are multicast on those physical networks having a multicast
    or broadcast capability, enabling dynamic discovery of neighboring
    routers.

    All routers connected to a common network must agree on certain
    parameters (Network mask, HelloInterval and RouterDeadInterval).
    These parameters are included in Hello packets, so that differences
    can inhibit the forming of neighbor relationships.  A detailed
    explanation of the receive processing for Hello packets is presented
    in Section 10.5.  The sending of Hello packets is covered in Section
    9.5.


        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |   Version #   |       1       |         Packet length         |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                          Router ID                            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                           Area ID                             |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |           Checksum            |             AuType            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                       Authentication                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                       Authentication                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                        Network Mask                           |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |         HelloInterval         |    Options    |    Rtr Pri    |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                     RouterDeadInterval                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                      Designated Router                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                   Backup Designated Router                    |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                          Neighbor                             |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                              ...                              |





Moy                                                           [Page 173]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    Network mask
        The network mask associated with this interface.  For example,
        if the interface is to a class B network whose third byte is
        used for subnetting, the network mask is 0xffffff00.

    Options
        The optional capabilities supported by the router, as documented
        in Section A.2.

    HelloInterval
        The number of seconds between this router's Hello packets.

    Rtr Pri
        This router's Router Priority.  Used in (Backup) Designated
        Router election.  If set to 0, the router will be ineligible to
        become (Backup) Designated Router.

    RouterDeadInterval
        The number of seconds before declaring a silent router down.

    Designated Router
        The identity of the Designated Router for this network, in the
        view of the advertising router.  The Designated Router is
        identified here by its IP interface address on the network.  Set
        to 0.0.0.0 if there is no Designated Router.

    Backup Designated Router
        The identity of the Backup Designated Router for this network,
        in the view of the advertising router.  The Backup Designated
        Router is identified here by its IP interface address on the
        network.  Set to 0.0.0.0 if there is no Backup Designated
        Router.

    Neighbor
        The Router IDs of each router from whom valid Hello packets have
        been seen recently on the network.  Recently means in the last
        RouterDeadInterval seconds.














Moy                                                           [Page 174]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A.3.3 The Database Description packet

    Database Description packets are OSPF packet type 2.  These packets
    are exchanged when an adjacency is being initialized.  They describe
    the contents of the topological database.  Multiple packets may be
    used to describe the database.  For this purpose a poll-response
    procedure is used.  One of the routers is designated to be master,
    the other a slave.  The master sends Database Description packets
    (polls) which are acknowledged by Database Description packets sent
    by the slave (responses).  The responses are linked to the polls via
    the packets' DD sequence numbers.


        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |   Version #   |       2       |         Packet length         |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                          Router ID                            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                           Area ID                             |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |           Checksum            |             AuType            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                       Authentication                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                       Authentication                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |       0       |       0       |    Options    |0|0|0|0|0|I|M|MS
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                     DD sequence number                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                                                               |
       +-                                                             -+
       |                             A                                 |
       +-                 Link State Advertisement                    -+
       |                           Header                              |
       +-                                                             -+
       |                                                               |
       +-                                                             -+
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                              ...                              |


    The format of the Database Description packet is very similar to
    both the Link State Request and Link State Acknowledgment packets.
    The main part of all three is a list of items, each item describing



Moy                                                           [Page 175]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    a piece of the topological database.  The sending of Database
    Description Packets is documented in Section 10.8.  The reception of
    Database Description packets is documented in Section 10.6.

    0   These fields are reserved.  They must be 0.

    Options
        The optional capabilities supported by the router, as documented
        in Section A.2.

    I-bit
        The Init bit.  When set to 1, this packet is the first in the
        sequence of Database Description Packets.

    M-bit
        The More bit.  When set to 1, it indicates that more Database
        Description Packets are to follow.

    MS-bit
        The Master/Slave bit.  When set to 1, it indicates that the
        router is the master during the Database Exchange process.
        Otherwise, the router is the slave.

    DD sequence number
        Used to sequence the collection of Database Description Packets.
        The initial value (indicated by the Init bit being set) should
        be unique.  The DD sequence number then increments until the
        complete database description has been sent.


    The rest of the packet consists of a (possibly partial) list of the
    topological database's pieces.  Each link state advertisement in the
    database is described by its link state advertisement header.  The
    link state advertisement header is documented in Section A.4.1.  It
    contains all the information required to uniquely identify both the
    advertisement and the advertisement's current instance.















Moy                                                           [Page 176]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A.3.4 The Link State Request packet

    Link State Request packets are OSPF packet type 3.  After exchanging
    Database Description packets with a neighboring router, a router may
    find that parts of its topological database are out of date.  The
    Link State Request packet is used to request the pieces of the
    neighbor's database that are more up to date.  Multiple Link State
    Request packets may need to be used.  The sending of Link State
    Request packets is the last step in bringing up an adjacency.

    A router that sends a Link State Request packet has in mind the
    precise instance of the database pieces it is requesting, defined by
    LS sequence number, LS checksum, and LS age, although these fields
    are not specified in the Link State Request Packet itself.  The
    router may receive even more recent instances in response.

    The sending of Link State Request packets is documented in Section
    10.9.  The reception of Link State Request packets is documented in
    Section 10.7.


        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |   Version #   |       3       |         Packet length         |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                          Router ID                            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                           Area ID                             |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |           Checksum            |             AuType            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                       Authentication                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                       Authentication                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                          LS type                              |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                       Link State ID                           |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                     Advertising Router                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                              ...                              |


    Each advertisement requested is specified by its LS type, Link State
    ID, and Advertising Router.  This uniquely identifies the
    advertisement, but not its instance.  Link State Request packets are



Moy                                                           [Page 177]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    understood to be requests for the most recent instance (whatever
    that might be).

















































Moy                                                           [Page 178]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A.3.5 The Link State Update packet

    Link State Update packets are OSPF packet type 4.  These packets
    implement the flooding of link state advertisements.  Each Link
    State Update packet carries a collection of link state
    advertisements one hop further from its origin.  Several link state
    advertisements may be included in a single packet.

    Link State Update packets are multicast on those physical networks
    that support multicast/broadcast.  In order to make the flooding
    procedure reliable, flooded advertisements are acknowledged in Link
    State Acknowledgment packets.  If retransmission of certain
    advertisements is necessary, the retransmitted advertisements are
    always carried by unicast Link State Update packets.  For more
    information on the reliable flooding of link state advertisements,
    consult Section 13.


        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |   Version #   |       4       |         Packet length         |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                          Router ID                            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                           Area ID                             |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |           Checksum            |             AuType            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                       Authentication                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                       Authentication                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                      # advertisements                         |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                                                               |
       +-                                                            +-+
       |                  Link state advertisements                    |
       +-                                                            +-+
       |                              ...                              |



    # advertisements
        The number of link state advertisements included in this update.






Moy                                                           [Page 179]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    The body of the Link State Update packet consists of a list of link
    state advertisements.  Each advertisement begins with a common 20
    byte header, the link state advertisement header.  This header is
    described in Section A.4.1.  Otherwise, the format of each of the
    five types of link state advertisements is different.  Their formats
    are described in Section A.4.













































Moy                                                           [Page 180]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A.3.6 The Link State Acknowledgment packet

    Link State Acknowledgment Packets are OSPF packet type 5.  To make
    the flooding of link state advertisements reliable, flooded
    advertisements are explicitly acknowledged.  This acknowledgment is
    accomplished through the sending and receiving of Link State
    Acknowledgment packets.  Multiple link state advertisements can be
    acknowledged in a single Link State Acknowledgment packet.

    Depending on the state of the sending interface and the source of
    the advertisements being acknowledged, a Link State Acknowledgment
    packet is sent either to the multicast address AllSPFRouters, to the
    multicast address AllDRouters, or as a unicast.  The sending of Link
    State Acknowledgement packets is documented in Section 13.5.  The
    reception of Link State Acknowledgement packets is documented in
    Section 13.7.

    The format of this packet is similar to that of the Data Description
    packet.  The body of both packets is simply a list of link state
    advertisement headers.


        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |   Version #   |       5       |         Packet length         |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                          Router ID                            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                           Area ID                             |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |           Checksum            |             AuType            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                       Authentication                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                       Authentication                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                                                               |
       +-                                                             -+
       |                             A                                 |
       +-                 Link State Advertisement                    -+
       |                           Header                              |
       +-                                                             -+
       |                                                               |
       +-                                                             -+
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                              ...                              |



Moy                                                           [Page 181]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    Each acknowledged link state advertisement is described by its link
    state advertisement header.  The link state advertisement header is
    documented in Section A.4.1.  It contains all the information
    required to uniquely identify both the advertisement and the
    advertisement's current instance.














































Moy                                                           [Page 182]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A.4 Link state advertisement formats

    There are five distinct types of link state advertisements.  Each
    link state advertisement begins with a standard 20-byte link state
    advertisement header.  This header is explained in Section A.4.1.
    Succeeding sections then diagram the separate link state
    advertisement types.

    Each link state advertisement describes a piece of the OSPF routing
    domain.  Every router originates a router links advertisement.  In
    addition, whenever the router is elected Designated Router, it
    originates a network links advertisement.  Other types of link state
    advertisements may also be originated (see Section 12.4).  All link
    state advertisements are then flooded throughout the OSPF routing
    domain.  The flooding algorithm is reliable, ensuring that all
    routers have the same collection of link state advertisements.  (See
    Section 13 for more information concerning the flooding algorithm).
    This collection of advertisements is called the link state (or
    topological) database.

    From the link state database, each router constructs a shortest path
    tree with itself as root.  This yields a routing table (see Section
    11).  For the details of the routing table build process, see
    Section 16.



























Moy                                                           [Page 183]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A.4.1 The Link State Advertisement header

    All link state advertisements begin with a common 20 byte header.
    This header contains enough information to uniquely identify the
    advertisement (LS type, Link State ID, and Advertising Router).
    Multiple instances of the link state advertisement may exist in the
    routing domain at the same time.  It is then necessary to determine
    which instance is more recent.  This is accomplished by examining
    the LS age, LS sequence number and LS checksum fields that are also
    contained in the link state advertisement header.


        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |            LS age             |    Options    |    LS type    |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                        Link State ID                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                     Advertising Router                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                     LS sequence number                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |         LS checksum           |             length            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+



    LS age
        The time in seconds since the link state advertisement was
        originated.

    Options
        The optional capabilities supported by the described portion of
        the routing domain.  OSPF's optional capabilities are documented
        in Section A.2.

    LS type
        The type of the link state advertisement.  Each link state type
        has a separate advertisement format.  The link state types are
        as follows (see Section 12.1.3 for further explanation):










Moy                                                           [Page 184]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994



                        LS Type   Description
                        ___________________________________
                        1         Router links
                        2         Network links
                        3         Summary link (IP network)
                        4         Summary link (ASBR)
                        5         AS external link




    Link State ID
        This field identifies the portion of the internet environment
        that is being described by the advertisement.  The contents of
        this field depend on the advertisement's LS type.  For example,
        in network links advertisements the Link State ID is set to the
        IP interface address of the network's Designated Router (from
        which the network's IP address can be derived).  The Link State
        ID is further discussed in Section 12.1.4.

    Advertising Router
        The Router ID of the router that originated the link state
        advertisement.  For example, in network links advertisements
        this field is set to the Router ID of the network's Designated
        Router.

    LS sequence number
        Detects old or duplicate link state advertisements.  Successive
        instances of a link state advertisement are given successive LS
        sequence numbers.  See Section 12.1.6 for more details.

    LS checksum
        The Fletcher checksum of the complete contents of the link state
        advertisement, including the link state advertisement header but
        excepting the LS age field. See Section 12.1.7 for more details.

    length
        The length in bytes of the link state advertisement.  This
        includes the 20 byte link state advertisement header.











Moy                                                           [Page 185]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A.4.2 Router links advertisements

    Router links advertisements are the Type 1 link state
    advertisements.  Each router in an area originates a router links
    advertisement.  The advertisement describes the state and cost of
    the router's links (i.e., interfaces) to the area.  All of the
    router's links to the area must be described in a single router
    links advertisement.  For details concerning the construction of
    router links advertisements, see Section 12.4.1.


        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |            LS age             |     Options   |       1       |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                        Link State ID                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                     Advertising Router                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                     LS sequence number                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |         LS checksum           |             length            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |    0    |V|E|B|        0      |            # links            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                          Link ID                              |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                         Link Data                             |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |     Type      |     # TOS     |        TOS 0 metric           |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |      TOS      |        0      |            metric             |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                              ...                              |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |      TOS      |        0      |            metric             |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                          Link ID                              |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                         Link Data                             |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                              ...                              |


    In router links advertisements, the Link State ID field is set to
    the router's OSPF Router ID.  The T-bit is set in the
    advertisement's Option field if and only if the router is able to



Moy                                                           [Page 186]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    calculate a separate set of routes for each IP TOS.  Router links
    advertisements are flooded throughout a single area only.

    bit V
        When set, the router is an endpoint of an active virtual link
        that is using the described area as a Transit area (V is for
        virtual link endpoint).

    bit E
        When set, the router is an AS boundary router (E is for
        external)

    bit B
        When set, the router is an area border router (B is for border)

    # links
        The number of router links described by this advertisement.
        This must be the total collection of router links (i.e.,
        interfaces) to the area.


    The following fields are used to describe each router link (i.e.,
    interface). Each router link is typed (see the below Type field).
    The Type field indicates the kind of link being described.  It may
    be a link to a transit network, to another router or to a stub
    network.  The values of all the other fields describing a router
    link depend on the link's Type.  For example, each link has an
    associated 32-bit data field.  For links to stub networks this field
    specifies the network's IP address mask.  For other link types the
    Link Data specifies the router's associated IP interface address.


    Type
        A quick description of the router link.  One of the following.
        Note that host routes are classified as links to stub networks
        whose network mask is 0xffffffff.



                 Type   Description
                 __________________________________________________
                 1      Point-to-point connection to another router
                 2      Connection to a transit network
                 3      Connection to a stub network
                 4      Virtual link






Moy                                                           [Page 187]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    Link ID
        Identifies the object that this router link connects to.  Value
        depends on the link's Type.  When connecting to an object that
        also originates a link state advertisement (i.e., another router
        or a transit network) the Link ID is equal to the neighboring
        advertisement's Link State ID.  This provides the key for
        looking up said advertisement in the link state database.  See
        Section 12.2 for more details.



                       Type   Link ID
                       ______________________________________
                       1      Neighboring router's Router ID
                       2      IP address of Designated Router
                       3      IP network/subnet number
                       4      Neighboring router's Router ID




    Link Data
        Contents again depend on the link's Type field. For connections
        to stub networks, it specifies the network's IP address mask.
        For unnumbered point-to-point connections, it specifies the
        interface's MIB-II [RFC 1213] ifIndex value. For the other link
        types it specifies the router's associated IP interface address.
        This latter piece of information is needed during the routing
        table build process, when calculating the IP address of the next
        hop. See Section 16.1.1 for more details.

    # TOS
        The number of different TOS metrics given for this link, not
        counting the required metric for TOS 0.  For example, if no
        additional TOS metrics are given, this field should be set to 0.

    TOS 0 metric
        The cost of using this router link for TOS 0.


    For each link, separate metrics may be specified for each Type of
    Service (TOS).  The metric for TOS 0 must always be included, and
    was discussed above.  Metrics for non-zero TOS are described below.
    The encoding of TOS in OSPF link state advertisements is described
    in Section 12.3.  Note that the cost for non-zero TOS values that
    are not specified defaults to the TOS 0 cost.  Metrics must be
    listed in order of increasing TOS encoding.  For example, the metric
    for TOS 16 must always follow the metric for TOS 8 when both are



Moy                                                           [Page 188]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    specified.


    TOS IP Type of Service that this metric refers to.  The encoding of
        TOS in OSPF link state advertisements is described in Section
        12.3.

    metric
        The cost of using this outbound router link, for traffic of the
        specified TOS.









































Moy                                                           [Page 189]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A.4.3 Network links advertisements

    Network links advertisements are the Type 2 link state
    advertisements.  A network links advertisement is originated for
    each transit network in the area.  A transit network is a multi-
    access network that has more than one attached router.  The network
    links advertisement is originated by the network's Designated
    Router.  The advertisement describes all routers attached to the
    network, including the Designated Router itself.  The
    advertisement's Link State ID field lists the IP interface address
    of the Designated Router.

    The distance from the network to all attached routers is zero, for
    all Types of Service.  This is why the TOS and metric fields need
    not be specified in the network links advertisement.  For details
    concerning the construction of network links advertisements, see
    Section 12.4.2.


        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |            LS age             |      Options  |      2        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                        Link State ID                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                     Advertising Router                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                     LS sequence number                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |         LS checksum           |             length            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                         Network Mask                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                        Attached Router                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                              ...                              |



    Network Mask
        The IP address mask for the network.  For example, a class A
        network would have the mask 0xff000000.

    Attached Router
        The Router IDs of each of the routers attached to the network.
        Actually, only those routers that are fully adjacent to the
        Designated Router are listed.  The Designated Router includes



Moy                                                           [Page 190]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        itself in this list.  The number of routers included can be
        deduced from the link state advertisement header's length field.

















































Moy                                                           [Page 191]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A.4.4 Summary link advertisements

    Summary link advertisements are the Type 3 and 4 link state
    advertisements.  These advertisements are originated by area border
    routers.  A separate summary link advertisement is made for each
    destination (known to the router) which belongs to the AS, yet is
    outside the area.  For details concerning the construction of
    summary link advertisements, see Section 12.4.3.

    Type 3 link state advertisements are used when the destination is an
    IP network.  In this case the advertisement's Link State ID field is
    an IP network number (if necessary, the Link State ID can also have
    one or more of the network's "host" bits set; see Appendix F for
    details). When the destination is an AS boundary router, a Type 4
    advertisement is used, and the Link State ID field is the AS
    boundary router's OSPF Router ID.  (To see why it is necessary to
    advertise the location of each ASBR, consult Section 16.4.)  Other
    than the difference in the Link State ID field, the format of Type 3
    and 4 link state advertisements is identical.


        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |            LS age             |     Options   |    3 or 4     |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                        Link State ID                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                     Advertising Router                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                     LS sequence number                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |         LS checksum           |             length            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                         Network Mask                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |     TOS       |                  metric                       |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                              ...                              |


    For stub areas, Type 3 summary link advertisements can also be used
    to describe a (per-area) default route.  Default summary routes are
    used in stub areas instead of flooding a complete set of external
    routes.  When describing a default summary route, the
    advertisement's Link State ID is always set to DefaultDestination
    (0.0.0.0) and the Network Mask is set to 0.0.0.0.




Moy                                                           [Page 192]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    Separate costs may be advertised for each IP Type of Service.  The
    encoding of TOS in OSPF link state advertisements is described in
    Section 12.3.  Note that the cost for TOS 0 must be included, and is
    always listed first.  If the T-bit is reset in the advertisement's
    Option field, only a route for TOS 0 is described by the
    advertisement.  Otherwise, routes for the other TOS values are also
    described; if a cost for a certain TOS is not included, its cost
    defaults to that specified for TOS 0.

    Network Mask
        For Type 3 link state advertisements, this indicates the
        destination network's IP address mask.  For example, when
        advertising the location of a class A network the value
        0xff000000 would be used.  This field is not meaningful and must
        be zero for Type 4 link state advertisements.


    For each specified Type of Service, the following fields are
    defined.  The number of TOS routes included can be calculated from
    the link state advertisement header's length field.  Values for TOS
    0 must be specified; they are listed first.  Other values must be
    listed in order of increasing TOS encoding.  For example, the cost
    for TOS 16 must always follow the cost for TOS 8 when both are
    specified.


    TOS The Type of Service that the following cost concerns.  The
        encoding of TOS in OSPF link state advertisements is described
        in Section 12.3.

    metric
        The cost of this route.  Expressed in the same units as the
        interface costs in the router links advertisements.


















Moy                                                           [Page 193]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


A.4.5 AS external link advertisements

    AS external link advertisements are the Type 5 link state
    advertisements.  These advertisements are originated by AS boundary
    routers.  A separate advertisement is made for each destination
    (known to the router) which is external to the AS.  For details
    concerning the construction of AS external link advertisements, see
    Section 12.4.3.

    AS external link advertisements usually describe a particular
    external destination.  For these advertisements the Link State ID
    field specifies an IP network number (if necessary, the Link State
    ID can also have one or more of the network's "host" bits set; see
    Appendix F for details).  AS external link advertisements are also
    used to describe a default route.  Default routes are used when no
    specific route exists to the destination.  When describing a default
    route, the Link State ID is always set to DefaultDestination
    (0.0.0.0) and the Network Mask is set to 0.0.0.0.


        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |            LS age             |     Options   |      5        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                        Link State ID                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                     Advertising Router                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                     LS sequence number                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |         LS checksum           |             length            |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                         Network Mask                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |E|    TOS      |                  metric                       |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                      Forwarding address                       |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                      External Route Tag                       |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                              ...                              |



    Separate costs may be advertised for each IP Type of Service.  The
    encoding of TOS in OSPF link state advertisements is described in
    Section 12.3.  Note that the cost for TOS 0 must be included, and is



Moy                                                           [Page 194]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    always listed first.  If the T-bit is reset in the advertisement's
    Option field, only a route for TOS 0 is described by the
    advertisement.  Otherwise, routes for the other TOS values are also
    described; if a cost for a certain TOS is not included, its cost
    defaults to that specified for TOS 0.

    Network Mask
        The IP address mask for the advertised destination.  For
        example, when advertising a class A network the mask 0xff000000
        would be used.


    For each specified Type of Service, the following fields are
    defined.  The number of TOS routes included can be calculated from
    the link state advertisement header's length field.  Values for TOS
    0 must be specified; they are listed first.  Other values must be
    listed in order of increasing TOS encoding.  For example, the cost
    for TOS 16 must always follow the cost for TOS 8 when both are
    specified.


    bit E
        The type of external metric.  If bit E is set, the metric
        specified is a Type 2 external metric.  This means the metric is
        considered larger than any link state path.  If bit E is zero,
        the specified metric is a Type 1 external metric.  This means
        that is is comparable directly (without translation) to the link
        state metric.

    Forwarding address
        Data traffic for the advertised destination will be forwarded to
        this address.  If the Forwarding address is set to 0.0.0.0, data
        traffic will be forwarded instead to the advertisement's
        originator (i.e., the responsible AS boundary router).

    TOS The Type of Service that the following cost concerns.  The
        encoding of TOS in OSPF link state advertisements is described
        in Section 12.3.

    metric
        The cost of this route.  Interpretation depends on the external
        type indication (bit E above).

    External Route Tag
        A 32-bit field attached to each external route.  This is not
        used by the OSPF protocol itself.  It may be used to communicate
        information between AS boundary routers; the precise nature of
        such information is outside the scope of this specification.



Moy                                                           [Page 195]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


B. Architectural Constants

    Several OSPF protocol parameters have fixed architectural values.
    These parameters have been referred to in the text by names such as
    LSRefreshTime.  The same naming convention is used for the
    configurable protocol parameters.  They are defined in Appendix C.

    The name of each architectural constant follows, together with its
    value and a short description of its function.


    LSRefreshTime
        The maximum time between distinct originations of any particular
        link state advertisement.  When the LS age field of one of the
        router's self-originated advertisements reaches the value
        LSRefreshTime, a new instance of the link state advertisement is
        originated, even though the contents of the advertisement (apart
        from the link state header) will be the same.  The value of
        LSRefreshTime is set to 30 minutes.

    MinLSInterval
        The minimum time between distinct originations of any particular
        link state advertisement.  The value of MinLSInterval is set to
        5 seconds.

    MaxAge
        The maximum age that a link state advertisement can attain. When
        an advertisement's LS age field reaches MaxAge, it is reflooded
        in an attempt to flush the advertisement from the routing domain
        (See Section 14). Advertisements of age MaxAge are not used in
        the routing table calculation.  The value of MaxAge must be
        greater than LSRefreshTime.  The value of MaxAge is set to 1
        hour.

    CheckAge
        When the age of a link state advertisement (that is contained in
        the link state database) hits a multiple of CheckAge, the
        advertisement's checksum is verified.  An incorrect checksum at
        this time indicates a serious error.  The value of CheckAge is
        set to 5 minutes.

    MaxAgeDiff
        The maximum time dispersion that can occur, as a link state
        advertisement is flooded throughout the AS.  Most of this time
        is accounted for by the link state advertisements sitting on
        router output queues (and therefore not aging) during the
        flooding process.  The value of MaxAgeDiff is set to 15 minutes.




Moy                                                           [Page 196]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


    LSInfinity
        The metric value indicating that the destination described by a
        link state advertisement is unreachable. Used in summary link
        advertisements and AS external link advertisements as an
        alternative to premature aging (see Section 14.1). It is defined
        to be the 24-bit binary value of all ones: 0xffffff.

    DefaultDestination
        The Destination ID that indicates the default route.  This route
        is used when no other matching routing table entry can be found.
        The default destination can only be advertised in AS external
        link advertisements and in stub areas' type 3 summary link
        advertisements.  Its value is the IP address 0.0.0.0.






































Moy                                                           [Page 197]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


C. Configurable Constants

    The OSPF protocol has quite a few configurable parameters.  These
    parameters are listed below.  They are grouped into general
    functional categories (area parameters, interface parameters, etc.).
    Sample values are given for some of the parameters.

    Some parameter settings need to be consistent among groups of
    routers.  For example, all routers in an area must agree on that
    area's parameters, and all routers attached to a network must agree
    on that network's IP network number and mask.

    Some parameters may be determined by router algorithms outside of
    this specification (e.g., the address of a host connected to the
    router via a SLIP line).  From OSPF's point of view, these items are
    still configurable.

    C.1 Global parameters

        In general, a separate copy of the OSPF protocol is run for each
        area.  Because of this, most configuration parameters are
        defined on a per-area basis.  The few global configuration
        parameters are listed below.


        Router ID
            This is a 32-bit number that uniquely identifies the router
            in the Autonomous System.  One algorithm for Router ID
            assignment is to choose the largest or smallest IP address
            assigned to the router.  If a router's OSPF Router ID is
            changed, the router's OSPF software should be restarted
            before the new Router ID takes effect. Before restarting in
            order to change its Router ID, the router should flush its
            self-originated link state advertisements from the routing
            domain (see Section 14.1), or they will persist for up to
            MaxAge minutes.

        TOS capability
            This item indicates whether the router will calculate
            separate routes based on TOS.  For more information, see
            Sections 4.5 and 16.9.

    C.2 Area parameters

        All routers belonging to an area must agree on that area's
        configuration.  Disagreements between two routers will lead to
        an inability for adjacencies to form between them, with a
        resulting hindrance to the flow of routing protocol and data



Moy                                                           [Page 198]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        traffic.  The following items must be configured for an area:


        Area ID
            This is a 32-bit number that identifies the area.  The Area
            ID of 0.0.0.0 is reserved for the backbone.  If the area
            represents a subnetted network, the IP network number of the
            subnetted network may be used for the Area ID.

        List of address ranges
            An OSPF area is defined as a list of address ranges. Each
            address range consists of the following items:

            [IP address, mask]
                    Describes the collection of IP addresses contained
                    in the address range. Networks and hosts are
                    assigned to an area depending on whether their
                    addresses fall into one of the area's defining
                    address ranges.  Routers are viewed as belonging to
                    multiple areas, depending on their attached
                    networks' area membership.

            Status  Set to either Advertise or DoNotAdvertise.  Routing
                    information is condensed at area boundaries.
                    External to the area, at most a single route is
                    advertised (via a summary link advertisement) for
                    each address range. The route is advertised if and
                    only if the address range's Status is set to
                    Advertise.  Unadvertised ranges allow the existence
                    of certain networks to be intentionally hidden from
                    other areas. Status is set to Advertise by default.

            As an example, suppose an IP subnetted network is to be its
            own OSPF area.  The area would be configured as a single
            address range, whose IP address is the address of the
            subnetted network, and whose mask is the natural class A, B,
            or C address mask.  A single route would be advertised
            external to the area, describing the entire subnetted
            network.

        AuType
            Each area can be configured for a separate type of
            authentication.  See Appendix D for a discussion of the
            defined authentication types.

        ExternalRoutingCapability
            Whether AS external advertisements will be flooded
            into/throughout the area.  If AS external advertisements are



Moy                                                           [Page 199]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            excluded from the area, the area is called a "stub".
            Internal to stub areas, routing to external destinations
            will be based solely on a default summary route.  The
            backbone cannot be configured as a stub area.  Also, virtual
            links cannot be configured through stub areas.  For more
            information, see Section 3.6.

        StubDefaultCost
            If the area has been configured as a stub area, and the
            router itself is an area border router, then the
            StubDefaultCost indicates the cost of the default summary
            link that the router should advertise into the area.  There
            can be a separate cost configured for each IP TOS.  See
            Section 12.4.3 for more information.

    C.3 Router interface parameters

        Some of the configurable router interface parameters (such as IP
        interface address and subnet mask) actually imply properties of
        the attached networks, and therefore must be consistent across
        all the routers attached to that network.  The parameters that
        must be configured for a router interface are:


        IP interface address
            The IP protocol address for this interface.  This uniquely
            identifies the router over the entire internet.  An IP
            address is not required on serial lines.  Such a serial line
            is called "unnumbered".

        IP interface mask
            Also referred to as the subnet mask, this indicates the
            portion of the IP interface address that identifies the
            attached network.  Masking the IP interface address with the
            IP interface mask yields the IP network number of the
            attached network.  On point-to-point networks and virtual
            links, the IP interface mask is not defined. On these
            networks, the link itself is not assigned an IP network
            number, and so the addresses of each side of the link are
            assigned independently, if they are assigned at all.

        Interface output cost(s)
            The cost of sending a packet on the interface, expressed in
            the link state metric.  This is advertised as the link cost
            for this interface in the router's router links
            advertisement.  There may be a separate cost for each IP
            Type of Service.  The interface output cost(s) must always
            be greater than 0.



Moy                                                           [Page 200]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        RxmtInterval
            The number of seconds between link state advertisement
            retransmissions, for adjacencies belonging to this
            interface.  Also used when retransmitting Database
            Description and Link State Request Packets.  This should be
            well over the expected round-trip delay between any two
            routers on the attached network.  The setting of this value
            should be conservative or needless retransmissions will
            result.  It will need to be larger on low speed serial lines
            and virtual links.  Sample value for a local area network: 5
            seconds.

        InfTransDelay
            The estimated number of seconds it takes to transmit a Link
            State Update Packet over this interface.  Link state
            advertisements contained in the update packet must have
            their age incremented by this amount before transmission.
            This value should take into account the transmission and
            propagation delays of the interface.  It must be greater
            than 0.  Sample value for a local area network: 1 second.

        Router Priority
            An 8-bit unsigned integer.  When two routers attached to a
            network both attempt to become Designated Router, the one
            with the highest Router Priority takes precedence.  If there
            is still a tie, the router with the highest Router ID takes
            precedence.  A router whose Router Priority is set to 0 is
            ineligible to become Designated Router on the attached
            network.  Router Priority is only configured for interfaces
            to multi-access networks.

        HelloInterval
            The length of time, in seconds, between the Hello Packets
            that the router sends on the interface.  This value is
            advertised in the router's Hello Packets.  It must be the
            same for all routers attached to a common network.  The
            smaller the HelloInterval, the faster topological changes
            will be detected, but more OSPF routing protocol traffic
            will ensue.  Sample value for a X.25 PDN network: 30
            seconds.  Sample value for a local area network: 10 seconds.

        RouterDeadInterval
            After ceasing to hear a router's Hello Packets, the number
            of seconds before its neighbors declare the router down.
            This is also advertised in the router's Hello Packets in
            their RouterDeadInterval field.  This should be some
            multiple of the HelloInterval (say 4).  This value again
            must be the same for all routers attached to a common



Moy                                                           [Page 201]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            network.

        Authentication key
            This configured data allows the authentication procedure to
            generate and/or verify the authentication field in the OSPF
            header.  This value again must be the same for all routers
            attached to a common network.  For example, if the AuType
            indicates simple password, the Authentication key would be a
            64-bit password. This key would be inserted directly into
            the OSPF header when originating routing protocol packets.
            There could be a separate password for each network.

    C.4 Virtual link parameters

        Virtual links are used to restore/increase connectivity of the
        backbone.  Virtual links may be configured between any pair of
        area border routers having interfaces to a common (non-backbone)
        area.  The virtual link appears as an unnumbered point-to-point
        link in the graph for the backbone.  The virtual link must be
        configured in both of the area border routers.

        A virtual link appears in router links advertisements (for the
        backbone) as if it were a separate router interface to the
        backbone.  As such, it has all of the parameters associated with
        a router interface (see Section C.3).  Although a virtual link
        acts like an unnumbered point-to-point link, it does have an
        associated IP interface address.  This address is used as the IP
        source in OSPF protocol packets it sends along the virtual link,
        and is set dynamically during the routing table build process.
        Interface output cost is also set dynamically on virtual links
        to be the cost of the intra-area path between the two routers.
        The parameter RxmtInterval must be configured, and should be
        well over the expected round-trip delay between the two routers.
        This may be hard to estimate for a virtual link; it is better to
        err on the side of making it too large.  Router Priority is not
        used on virtual links.

        A virtual link is defined by the following two configurable
        parameters: the Router ID of the virtual link's other endpoint,
        and the (non-backbone) area through which the virtual link runs
        (referred to as the virtual link's Transit area).  Virtual links
        cannot be configured through stub areas.

    C.5 Non-broadcast, multi-access network parameters

        OSPF treats a non-broadcast, multi-access network much like it
        treats a broadcast network.  Since there may be many routers
        attached to the network, a Designated Router is selected for the



Moy                                                           [Page 202]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        network.  This Designated Router then originates a networks
        links advertisement, which lists all routers attached to the
        non-broadcast network.

        However, due to the lack of broadcast capabilities, it is
        necessary to use configuration parameters in the Designated
        Router selection.  These parameters need only be configured in
        those routers that are themselves eligible to become Designated
        Router (i.e., those router's whose Router Priority for the
        network is non-zero):


        List of all other attached routers
            The list of all other routers attached to the non-broadcast
            network.  Each router is listed by its IP interface address
            on the network.  Also, for each router listed, that router's
            eligibility to become Designated Router must be defined.
            When an interface to a non-broadcast network comes up, the
            router sends Hello Packets only to those neighbors eligible
            to become Designated Router, until the identity of the
            Designated Router is discovered.

        PollInterval
            If a neighboring router has become inactive (Hello Packets
            have not been seen for RouterDeadInterval seconds), it may
            still be necessary to send Hello Packets to the dead
            neighbor.  These Hello Packets will be sent at the reduced
            rate PollInterval, which should be much larger than
            HelloInterval.  Sample value for a PDN X.25 network: 2
            minutes.

    C.6 Host route parameters

        Host routes are advertised in router links advertisements as
        stub networks with mask 0xffffffff.  They indicate either router
        interfaces to point-to-point networks, looped router interfaces,
        or IP hosts that are directly connected to the router (e.g., via
        a SLIP line).  For each host directly connected to the router,
        the following items must be configured:


        Host IP address
            The IP address of the host.

        Cost of link to host
            The cost of sending a packet to the host, in terms of the
            link state metric.  There may be multiple costs configured,
            one for each IP TOS.  However, since the host probably has



Moy                                                           [Page 203]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            only a single connection to the internet, the actual
            configured cost(s) in many cases is unimportant (i.e., will
            have no effect on routing).
















































Moy                                                           [Page 204]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


D. Authentication

    All OSPF protocol exchanges are authenticated.  The OSPF packet
    header (see Section A.3.1) includes an authentication type field,
    and 64-bits of data for use by the appropriate authentication scheme
    (determined by the type field).

    The authentication type is configurable on a per-area basis.
    Additional authentication data is configurable on a per-interface
    basis.  For example, if an area uses a simple password scheme for
    authentication, a separate password may be configured for each
    network contained in the area.

    Authentication types 0 and 1 are defined by this specification.  All
    other authentication types are reserved for definition by the IANA
    (iana@ISI.EDU).  The current list of authentication types is
    described below in Table 20.



                  AuType       Description
                  ___________________________________________
                  0            No authentication
                  1            Simple password
                  All others   Reserved for assignment by the
                               IANA (iana@ISI.EDU)


                      Table 20: OSPF authentication types.



    D.1 AuType 0 -- No authentication

        Use of this authentication type means that routing exchanges in
        the area are not authenticated.  The 64-bit field in the OSPF
        header can contain anything; it is not examined on packet
        reception.

    D.2 AuType 1 -- Simple password

        Using this authentication type, a 64-bit field is configured on
        a per-network basis.  All packets sent on a particular network
        must have this configured value in their OSPF header 64-bit
        authentication field.  This essentially serves as a "clear" 64-
        bit password.





Moy                                                           [Page 205]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        This guards against routers inadvertently joining the area.
        They must first be configured with their attached networks'
        passwords before they can participate in the routing domain.
















































Moy                                                           [Page 206]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


E. Differences from RFC 1247

    This section documents the differences between this memo and RFC
    1247.  These differences include a fix for a problem involving OSPF
    virtual links, together with minor enhancements and clarifications
    to the protocol. All differences are backward-compatible.
    Implementations of this memo and of RFC 1247 will interoperate.

    E.1 A fix for a problem with OSPF Virtual links

        In RFC 1247, certain configurations of OSPF virtual links can
        cause routing loops. The root of the problem is that while there
        is an information mismatch at the boundary of any virtual link's
        Transit area, a backbone path can still cross the boundary. RFC
        1247 attempted to compensate for this information mismatch by
        adjusting any backbone path as it enters the transit area (see
        Section 16.3 in RFC 1247). However, this proved not to be
        enough. This memo fixes the problem by having all area border
        routers determine, by looking at summary links, whether better
        backbone paths can be found through the transit areas.

        This fix simplifies the OSPF virtual link logic, and consists of
        the following components:

        o   A new bit has been defined in the router links
            advertisement, called bit V. Bit V is set in a router's
            router links advertisement for Area A if and only if the
            router is an endpoint of an active virtual link that uses
            Area A as its Transit area (see Sections 12.4.1 and A.4.2).
            This enables the other routers attached to Area A to
            discover whether the area supports any virtual links (i.e.,
            is a transit area). This discovery is done during the
            calculation of Area A's shortest-path tree (see Section
            16.1).

        o   To aid in the description of the algorithm, a new parameter
            has been added to the OSPF area structure:
            TransitCapability. This parameter indicates whether the area
            supports any active virtual links. Equivalently, it
            indicates whether the area can carry traffic that neither
            originates nor terminates in the area itself.

        o   The calculation in Section 16.3 of RFC 1247 has been
            replaced. The new calculation, performed by area border
            routers only, examines the summary links belonging to all
            attached transit areas to see whether the transit areas can
            provide better paths than those already found in Sections
            16.1 and 16.2.



Moy                                                           [Page 207]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        o   The incremental calculations in Section 16.5 have been
            updated as a result of the new calculations in Section 16.3.

    E.2 Supporting supernetting and subnet 0

        In RFC 1247, an OSPF router cannot originate separate AS
        external link advertisements (or separate summary link
        advertisements) for two networks that have the same address but
        different masks. This situation can arise when subnet 0 of a
        network has been assigned (a practice that is generally
        discouraged), or when using supernetting as described in [RFC
        1519] (a practice that is generally encouraged to reduce the
        size of routing tables), or even when in transition from one
        mask to another on a subnet.  Using supernetting as an example,
        you might want to aggregate the four class C networks
        192.9.4.0-192.9.7.0, advertising one route for the aggregation
        and another for the single class C network 192.9.4.0.

        The reason behind this limitation is that in RFC 1247, the Link
        State ID of AS external link advertisements and summary link
        advertisements is set equal to the described network's IP
        address. In the above example, RFC 1247 would assign both
        advertisements the Link State ID of 192.9.4.0, making them in
        essence the same advertisement. This memo fixes the problem by
        relaxing the setting of the Link State ID so that any of the
        "host" bits of the network address can also be set. This allows
        you to disambiguate advertisements for networks having the same
        address but different masks. Given an AS external link
        advertisement (or a summary link advertisement), the described
        network's address can now be obtained by masking the Link State
        ID with the network mask carried in the body of the
        advertisement.  Again using the above example, the aggregate can
        now be advertised using a Link State ID of 192.9.4.0 and the
        single class C network advertised simultaneously using the Link
        State ID of 192.9.4.255.

        Appendix F gives one possible algorithm for setting one or more
        "host" bits in the Link State ID in order to disambiguate
        advertisements. It should be noted that this is a local
        decision. Each router in an OSPF system is free to use its own
        algorithm, since only those advertisements originated by the
        router itself are affected.

        It is believed that this change will be more or less compatible
        with implementations of RFC 1247. Implementations of RFC 1247
        will probably either a) install routing table entries that won't
        be used or b) do the correct processing as outlined in this memo
        or c) mark the advertisement as unusable when presented with a



Moy                                                           [Page 208]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        Link State ID that has one or more of the host bits set.
        However, in the interest of interoperability, implementations of
        this memo should only set the host bits in Link State IDs when
        absolutely necessary.

        The change affects Sections 12.1.4, 12.4.3, 12.4.5, 16.2, 16.3,
        16.4, 16.5, 16.6, A.4.4 and A.4.5.

    E.3 Obsoleting LSInfinity in router links advertisements

        The metric of LSInfinity can no longer be used in router links
        advertisements to indicate unusable links. This is being done
        for several reasons:

        o   It removes any possible confusion in an OSPF area as to just
            which routers/networks are reachable in the area. For
            example, the above virtual link fix relies on detecting the
            existence of virtual links when running the Dijkstra.
            However, when one-directional links (i.e., cost of
            LSInfinity in one direction, but not the other) are
            possible, some routers may detect the existence of virtual
            links while others may not. This may defeat the fix for the
            virtual link problem.

        o   It also helps OSPF's Multicast routing extensions (MOSPF),
            because one-way reachability can lead to places that are
            reachable via unicast but not multicast, or vice versa.

        The two prior justifications for using LSInfinity in router
        links advertisements were 1) it was a way to not support TOS
        before TOS was optional and 2) it went along with strong TOS
        interpretations. These justifications are no longer valid.
        However, LSInfinity will continue to mean "unreachable" in
        summary link advertisements and AS external link advertisements,
        as some implementations use this as an alternative to the
        premature aging procedure specified in Section 14.1.

        This change has one other side effect. When two routers are
        connected via a virtual link whose underlying path is non-TOS-
        capable, they must now revert to being non-TOS-capable routers
        themselves, instead of the previous behavior of advertising the
        non-zero TOS costs of the virtual link as LSInfinity. See
        Section 15 for details.

    E.4 TOS encoding updated

        The encoding of TOS in OSPF link state advertisements has been
        updated to reflect the new TOS value (minimize monetary cost)



Moy                                                           [Page 209]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        defined by [RFC 1349]. The OSPF encoding is defined in Section
        12.3, which is identical in content to Section A.5 of [RFC
        1349].

    E.5 Summarizing routes into transit areas

        RFC 1247 mandated that routes associated with Area A are never
        summarized back into Area A. However, this memo further reduces
        the number of summary links originated by refusing to summarize
        into Area A those routes having next hops belonging to Area A.
        This is an optimization over RFC 1247 behavior when virtual
        links are present.  For example, in the area configuration of
        Figure 6, Router RT11 need only originate a single summary link
        having the (collapsed) destination N9-N11,H1 into its connected
        transit area Area 2, since all of its other eligible routes have
        next hops belonging to Area 2 (and as such only need be
        advertised by other area border routers; in this case, Routers
        RT10 and RT7). This is the logical equivalent of a Distance
        Vector protocol's split horizon logic.

        This change appears in Section 12.4.3.

    E.6 Summarizing routes into stub areas

        RFC 1247 mandated that area border routers attached to stub
        areas must summarize all inter-area routes into the stub areas.
        However, while area border routers connected to OSPF stub areas
        must originate default summary links into the stub area, they
        need not summarize other routes into the stub area. The amount
        of summarization done into stub areas can instead be put under
        configuration control. The network administrator can then make
        the trade-off between optimal routing and database size.

        This change appears in Sections 12.4.3 and 12.4.4.

    E.7 Flushing anomalous network links advertisements

        Text was added indicating that a network links advertisement
        whose Link State ID is equal to one of the router's own IP
        interface addresses should be considered to be self-originated,
        regardless of the setting of the advertisement's Advertising
        Router. If the Advertising Router of such an advertisement is
        not equal to the router's own Router ID, the advertisement
        should be flushed from the routing domain using the premature
        aging procedure specified in Section 14.1. This case should be
        rare, and it indicates that the router's Router ID has changed
        since originating the advertisement.




Moy                                                           [Page 210]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        Failure to flush these anomalous advertisements could lead to
        multiple network links advertisements having the same Link State
        ID. This in turn could cause the Dijkstra calculation in Section
        16.1 to fail, since it would be impossible to tell which network
        links advertisement is valid (i.e., more recent).

        This change appears in Sections 13.4 and 14.1.

    E.8 Required Statistics appendix deleted

        Appendix D of RFC 1247, which specified a list of required
        statistics for an OSPF implementation, has been deleted. That
        appendix has been superseded by the two documents: the OSPF
        Version 2 Management Information Base and the OSPF Version 2
        Traps.

    E.9 Other changes

        The following small changes were also made to RFC 1247:

        o   When representing unnumbered point-to-point networks in
            router links advertisements, the corresponding Link Data
            field should be set to the unnumbered interface's MIB-II
            [RFC 1213] ifIndex value.

        o   A comment was added to Step 3 of the Dijkstra algorithm in
            Section 16.1. When removing vertices from the candidate
            list, and when there is a choice of vertices closest to the
            root, network vertices must be chosen before router vertices
            in order to necessarily find all equal-cost paths.

        o   A comment was added to Section 12.4.3 noting that a summary
            link advertisement cannot express a reachable destination
            whose path cost equals or exceeds LSInfinity.

        o   A comment was added to Section 15 noting that a virtual link
            whose underlying path has cost greater than hexadecimal
            0xffff (the maximum size of an interface cost in a router
            links advertisement) should be considered inoperational.

        o   An option was added to the definition of area address
            ranges, allowing the network administrator to specify that a
            particular range should not be advertised to other OSPF
            areas. This enables the existence of certain networks to be
            hidden from other areas. This change appears in Sections
            12.4.3 and C.2.





Moy                                                           [Page 211]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        o   A note was added reminding implementors that bit E (the AS
            boundary router indication) should never be set in a router
            links advertisement for a stub area, since stub areas cannot
            contain AS boundary routers.  This change appears in Section
            12.4.1.














































Moy                                                           [Page 212]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


F. An algorithm for assigning Link State IDs

    In RFC 1247, the Link State ID in AS external link advertisements
    and summary link advertisements is set to the described network's IP
    address. This memo relaxes that requirement, allowing one or more of
    the network's host bits to be set in the Link State ID. This allows
    the router to originate separate advertisements for networks having
    the same addresses, yet different masks. Such networks can occur in
    the presence of supernetting and subnet 0s (see Section E.2 for more
    information).

    This appendix gives one possible algorithm for setting the host bits
    in Link State IDs.  The choice of such an algorithm is a local
    decision. Separate routers are free to use different algorithms,
    since the only advertisements affected are the ones that the router
    itself originates. The only requirement on the algorithms used is
    that the network's IP address should be used as the Link State ID
    (the RFC 1247 behavior) whenever possible.

    The algorithm below is stated for AS external link advertisements.
    This is only for clarity; the exact same algorithm can be used for
    summary link advertisements. Suppose that the router wishes to
    originate an AS external link advertisement for a network having
    address NA and mask NM1. The following steps are then used to
    determine the advertisement's Link State ID:

    (1) Determine whether the router is already originating an AS
        external link advertisement with Link State ID equal to NA (in
        such an advertisement the router itself will be listed as the
        advertisement's Advertising Router).  If not, set the Link State
        ID equal to NA (the RFC 1247 behavior) and the algorithm
        terminates. Otherwise,

    (2) Obtain the network mask from the body of the already existing AS
        external link advertisement. Call this mask NM2. There are then
        two cases:

        o   NM1 is longer (i.e., more specific) than NM2. In this case,
            set the Link State ID in the new advertisement to be the
            network [NA,NM1] with all the host bits set (i.e., equal to
            NA or'ed together with all the bits that are not set in NM1,
            which is network [NA,NM1]'s broadcast address).

        o   NM2 is longer than NM1. In this case, change the existing
            advertisement (having Link State ID of NA) to reference the
            new network [NA,NM1] by incrementing the sequence number,
            changing the mask in the body to NM1 and using the cost for
            the new network. Then originate a new advertisement for the



Moy                                                           [Page 213]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


            old network [NA,NM2], with Link State ID equal to NA or'ed
            together with the bits that are not set in NM2 (i.e.,
            network [NA,NM2]'s broadcast address).

    The above algorithm assumes that all masks are contiguous; this
    ensures that when two networks have the same address, one mask is
    more specific than the other. The algorithm also assumes that no
    network exists having an address equal to another network's
    broadcast address. Given these two assumptions, the above algorithm
    always produces unique Link State IDs. The above algorithm can also
    be reworded as follows: When originating an AS external link state
    advertisement, try to use the network number as the Link State ID.
    If that produces a conflict, examine the two networks in conflict.
    One will be a subset of the other. For the less specific network,
    use the network number as the Link State ID and for the more
    specific use the network's broadcast address instead (i.e., flip all
    the "host" bits to 1).  If the most specific network was originated
    first, this will cause you to originate two link state
    advertisements at once.

    As an example of the algorithm, consider its operation when the
    following sequence of events occurs in a single router (Router A).


    (1) Router A wants to originate an AS external link advertisement
        for [10.0.0.0,255.255.255.0]:

        (a) A Link State ID of 10.0.0.0 is used.

    (2) Router A then wants to originate an AS external link
        advertisement for [10.0.0.0,255.255.0.0]:

        (a) The advertisement for [10.0.0,0,255.255.255.0] is
            reoriginated using a new Link State ID of 10.0.0.255.

        (b) A Link State ID of 10.0.0.0 is used for
            [10.0.0.0,255.255.0.0].

    (3) Router A then wants to originate an AS external link
        advertisement for [10.0.0.0,255.0.0.0]:

        (a) The advertisement for [10.0.0.0,255.255.0.0] is reoriginated
            using a new Link State ID of 10.0.255.255.

        (b) A Link State ID of 10.0.0.0 is used for
            [10.0.0.0,255.0.0.0].





Moy                                                           [Page 214]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


        (c) The network [10.0.0.0,255.255.255.0] keeps its Link State ID
            of 10.0.0.255.

















































Moy                                                           [Page 215]

RFC 1583                     OSPF Version 2                   March 1994


Security Considerations

    All OSPF protocol exchanges are authenticated. This is accomplished
    through authentication fields contained in the OSPF packet header.
    For more information, see Sections 8.1, 8.2, and Appendix D.

Author's Address

    John Moy
    Proteon, Inc.
    9 Technology Drive
    Westborough, MA 01581

    Phone: 508-898-2800
    Fax:   508-898-3176
    Email: jmoy@proteon.com



































Moy                                                           [Page 216]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.109, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/