[Docs] [txt|pdf|xml|html] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: (draft-bhandari-dnssdext-mdns-gateway) 00

dnssd                                                        S. Bhandari
Internet-Draft                                                B. Fajalia
Intended status: Informational                              R. Schmieder
Expires: April 23, 2014                                           S. Orr
                                                                A. Dutta
                                                                   Cisco
                                                        October 20, 2013


  Extending multicast DNS across local links in Campus and Enterprise
                                networks
                  draft-bhandari-dnssd-mdns-gateway-00

Abstract

   This document describes the requirements for extending multicast DNS
   in enterprise networks.  It provides an overview of a solution to
   extend multicast DNS services across links that have been implemented
   in routers, switches and wireless LAN controllers.

Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on April 23, 2014.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.




Bhandari, et al.         Expires April 23, 2014                 [Page 1]


Internet-Draft  mDNS across local links in campus network   October 2013


   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     1.1.  Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2.  Conventions and Terminology Used in this Document  . . . . . .  4
   3.  Solution overview  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     3.1.  Service Cache  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     3.2.  Service Filters  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     3.3.  Service Announcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     3.4.  Service Query  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     3.5.  Service Probing  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     3.6.  Service update, Service withdrawal . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     3.7.  Service Refresh  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     3.8.  mDNS Gateway for Wireless Network  . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
       3.8.1.  Advertising services on wireless networks  . . . . . .  8
       3.8.2.  Device Tracking  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
       3.8.3.  Mobility Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
       3.8.4.  mDNS traffic optimization  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   4.  Challenges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
   5.  Future work  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
   6.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
   7.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
   8.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
   9.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
   Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12















Bhandari, et al.         Expires April 23, 2014                 [Page 2]


Internet-Draft  mDNS across local links in campus network   October 2013


1.  Introduction

   Service discovery using multicast DNS (mDNS) as defined in [RFC6762]
   is limited in scope to L3 boundaries due to the use of link-local
   scoped multicast addresses.  Networks are partitioned into multiple
   segments by means of virtual local area networks (VLANs) or subnet
   creation for various reasons.  The need for network wide, seamless
   service discovery demands the extension of the discovery protocol
   beyond the L3 boundary.  There are also challenges in wireless
   networks (802.11, 802.15.4 etc) where a large number multicast
   messages can impact wireless performance.

   Enabling Service Discovery across L3 boundaries can be accomplished
   in one of the following ways using existing, unmodified protocols:

   1.  Unicast DNS-SD only: Use of DNS servers and allowing clients to
       use dynamic DNS updates and Long Lived Queries (LLQs) to announce
       and learn services dynamically [I-D.sekar-dns-llq]

   2.  mDNS only: Defining a mDNS gateway entity at the L3 boundaries
       extending service advertisements/discovery across the links it is
       attached to

   3.  Combination of unicast DNS and mDNS - Hybrid proxy approach as
       described in [I-D.cheshire-mdnsext-hybrid]

   4.  mDNS utilizing extended scope multicast - Modifying mDNS to use a
       wider scope multicast address for message exchange

   As a first step, this draft lists out the approach to use a mDNS
   gateway on a network element (2) to extend the service advertisement/
   discovery across network segments attached to the element.  While
   this approach does not preclude (1) or (3), it allows the extension
   of service discovery in a limited number of segments with minimal
   provisioning.  Approach (4) is not explored further as it would add
   to the flood of service discovery messages in the scope defined by
   the multicast address and it would also require changes on mDNS
   clients, which is undesirable.

1.1.  Requirements

   This section describes requirements for extending multicast DNS in an
   enterprise environment:

   1.   Extend service discovery across L3 boundaries

   2.   Defining and enforcing a policy to selectively filter services
        that are to be extended based on service type, service instance,



Bhandari, et al.         Expires April 23, 2014                 [Page 3]


Internet-Draft  mDNS across local links in campus network   October 2013


        location of the provider/user, role of the device or user
        accessing/offering the service.

   3.   Defining and enforcing a policy to selectively filter queries
        and announcements from specific clients or over specific network
        links

   4.   Filtering of link-local-only information - Services that resolve
        to IPv4 and IPv6 link-local addresses only must not be extended
        beyond the local link.  Suppression of resource records that
        contain link-local-only addresses from propagation beyond the
        local link

   5.   Optimization of mDNS queries/advertisements in wireless networks

   6.   Effectively handle roaming of mobile devices (changes in the
        Point of Attachment).  Especially if those devices advertise
        services

   7.   Limit the services in response to queries with a subset of the
        services by geographic proximity

   8.   Handle conflict resolution of service instances and host names
        across the links where the service is extended

   9.   Protection of resources (memory and CPU) of the network element
        that participates in extending multicast DNS

   10.  Audit, logging of services that are denied based on policy


2.   Conventions and Terminology Used in this Document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in "Key words for use in
   RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels" [RFC2119].

   This document uses the multicast DNS and DNS terminology conventions
   from [RFC6762] and [RFC6763].  It uses the same convention for
   services on the same link as defined in
   [I-D.cheshire-mdnsext-hybrid], repeated here for quick reference:

   Multicast DNS works between a hosts on the same link.  A set of hosts
   is considered to be "on the same link", if:

   when any host A from that set sends a packet to any other host B in
   that set, using unicast, multicast, or broadcast, the entire link-



Bhandari, et al.         Expires April 23, 2014                 [Page 4]


Internet-Draft  mDNS across local links in campus network   October 2013


   layer packet payload arrives unmodified, and

   a broadcast sent over that link by any host from that set of hosts
   can be received by every other host in that set

   The link-layer *header* may be modified, such as in Token Ring Source
   Routing [802.5], but not the link-layer *payload*.  In particular, if
   any device forwarding a packet modifies any part of the IP header or
   IP payload then the packet is no longer considered to be on the same
   link.  This means that the packet may pass through devices such as
   repeaters, bridges, hubs or switches and still be considered to be on
   the same link for the purpose of this document, but not through a
   device such as an IP router that decrements the TTL or otherwise
   modifies the IP header.

   o  mDNS gateway - An application that listens to services and extends
      the services across links


3.  Solution overview

   The solution introduces the mDNS gateway function which is co-located
   on the network element that connects to multiple links, typically an
   IP router.  The mDNS gateway function will be responsible for:

   o  Caching - Learn and cache services.  Maintain services in the
      cache according to service announcements, service removals and the
      TTL of the records.

   o  Respond to queries - Advertise in response to queries with
      services in the cache that are not in the same link-local domain
      where the query is received.

   o  Service filtering - Filter services to be added to the cache and
      to be included in the advertisements as per configured policies.

   o  Service redistribution - forwarding of unsolicited service
      announcements across links based on configuration

   o  Active query - Service queries sent by the mDNS gateway itself to
      learn about services or keep services 'fresh' in the cache.  Can
      be sent on one or more of the links the gateway is attached to.

3.1.  Service Cache

   The mDNS gateway maintains a database of DNS Resource Records (RR)
   required to advertise and resolve services.  At a minimum, the cache
   will contain PTR, SRV,TXT and A/AAAA RRs for each service with NSEC



Bhandari, et al.         Expires April 23, 2014                 [Page 5]


Internet-Draft  mDNS across local links in campus network   October 2013


   RR support for optimization.  In addition, the link on which the
   service and host originate is also maintained in the cache.  Records
   in the cache are refreshed based on TTL expiry.

3.2.  Service Filters

   A service filtering policy is configured with an action to permit or
   deny services into the cache or to filter services included in the
   response/advertisement messages based on matching criteria.  The
   matching criteria can be defined based on:

   o  Service type

   o  Service instance names

   o  Link on which the message is received

   o  Type of message - query or advertisement

   o  Location of the host querying or advertising a service

   A Service filtering policy is applied for incoming and outgoing
   messages.  A unique filtering policy can be applied Globally or per
   link.

   When a mDNS message is received by the mDNS gateway matching an
   action set for the link, the policy match is then executed.  The
   incoming advertisement is processed against the mDNS gateway inbound
   filtering policy applied on the link where the advertisement is
   received.  If the action is 'permit' the service is added to the
   cache.  If a response or advertisement is to be sent out, the
   outbound filtering policy applied applied on the interface is
   processed and if the resulting action is 'deny' then the service and
   its corresponding RRs are not included in the message sent out.

3.3.  Service Announcement

   The mDNS gateway listens for all service announcements.  When a
   service announcement is received, the announcement and all the
   additional RRs learnt are added to the cache or ignored based on the
   result of the configured inbound filter policy.

   The RRs containing link-local information e.g.  A or AAAA RRs that
   contain link-local scoped IPv4 or IPv6 addresses are not stored in
   the cache.

   When the mDNS gateway learns a service it can also forward the
   advertisement on other attached links.



Bhandari, et al.         Expires April 23, 2014                 [Page 6]


Internet-Draft  mDNS across local links in campus network   October 2013


3.4.  Service Query

   The mDNS gateway processes all queries against the configured
   filtering policy.  If the response to the query is permitted then it
   constructs the answers and additional records required to resolve the
   service from its cache for the services that are permitted.  Services
   that reside on the same link where the query is received are not
   included as the owner of the service will also see the query and
   would send the response directly.  Only services learnt from
   different links are considered in the response.

   Any query received for additional RRs to resolve the service e.g.
   query for SRV, A, AAAA etc are responded to in the same way.  If the
   records do not exist in the cache due to expiry or purging of cache
   for any other reason, mDNS gateway sends out an explicit query to
   fetch the records on the link where the service resides.

3.5.  Service Probing

   According to [RFC6762] before registering a service, RR probing is
   performed to ensure unique names.  As the mDNS gateway maintains a
   cache of all the RRs that are extended across the links it responds
   to probe records like any other query.  This will help in detecting
   and resolving name space conflicts across links where service
   discovery has been extended.

3.6.  Service update, Service withdrawal

   When the mDNS gateway receives a service update or withdrawal it
   updates or removes the service and all corresponding records from its
   cache.  It forwards the withdraw messages to other attached links.

3.7.  Service Refresh

   The RRs describing the service and resolving it have a TTL that
   defines the validity of the RR.  The mDNS gateway can continuously
   refresh each of the RRs in the cache as per the TTL rules.  For the
   purpose of optimization, the mDNS gateway can rely on the host
   interested in the RRs to trigger a refresh by setting the TTLs in the
   response to the time remaining since the record was learnt by the
   mDNS gateway.  If a client is interested in the RR then it would
   trigger a refresh when a fraction of the TTL is reached.  While
   responding to queries from hosts, the mDNS gateway inturn sends out
   queries to refresh the records that are about to expire on the source
   link where the records were learnt.






Bhandari, et al.         Expires April 23, 2014                 [Page 7]


Internet-Draft  mDNS across local links in campus network   October 2013


3.8.  mDNS Gateway for Wireless Network

   Deploying the mDNS gateway in wireless networks has a few additional
   requirements w.r.t to multicast radio optimization and mobility
   aspects.  This section describes some additional capabilities added
   to the mDNS gateway to satisfy these requirements.

3.8.1.  Advertising services on wireless networks

   In order to conserve wireless bandwidth, the mDNS gateway sends
   service advertisements as L2 unicast messages to wireless devices .

   In a wireless network, the mDNS gateway co-located on the network
   element that is providing the wireless service can act as a passive
   device and respond only if wireless clients send a mDNS query.  When
   bridging is turned off the mDNS gateway and the Layer 2 optimazation
   is enabled, the mDNS gateway will need to send the query responseas
   layer 2 unicast messages even when the provider is on the same link
   as the requestor.  Bridging of mDNS messages can be turned off based
   on configuration.  This is useful in the following scenario:

   1.  Save computation resources on the device which are used to
       replicate the multicast packet as a L2 unicast for all wireless
       clients.

   2.  If the wireless client is in power saving mode, sending a mDNS
       advertisement as a L2 unicast would forcefully awake the client
       and it would result into more power consumption by the wireless
       client.

   mDNS functionality is not impacted by acting as a passive gateway
   because the client would always send the mDNS query when inquiring
   for a service.

3.8.2.  Device Tracking

   Wireless clients are mobile in nature.  The mDNS gateway should learn
   the service instance only from the authenticated wireless client.
   The mDNS gateway should tag each service instance from a wireless
   client with the client's MAC address.  This MAC address should be
   used for device tracking.  If the wireless client leaves the network,
   the mDNS gateway should not wait until the TTL expires but it should
   actively clean up the service instance provided by that wireless
   client.  This is done to protect the mDNS gateway cache resources as
   well as to keep other clients from hearing about services that are no
   longer connected to the network..





Bhandari, et al.         Expires April 23, 2014                 [Page 8]


Internet-Draft  mDNS across local links in campus network   October 2013


3.8.3.  Mobility Considerations

   Wireless deployments supports seamless mobility.  In such a scenario,
   the mDNS gateway needs to be aware of the client location.  If the
   location changes, the mDNS gateway needs to update its mDNS cache.
   The mDNS gateway should tag each service instance with the device
   location.  The device location can be derived based on the Access
   Point (AP) to which the wireless client is attached.  If the client,
   which is providing any service, changes its location, this change
   needs to be reflected in the mDNS gateway.  If the client roams from
   one mDNS gateway to another mDNS gateway, then the old gateway should
   provide the service instance information pertaining to the roamed
   client to the new gateway and then it must clear the mDNS cache for
   that particular client.  If the mDNS gateway is not acting as a
   passive gateway, it may choose to update the network about the new
   service instance it has learnt.

3.8.4.  mDNS traffic optimization

   All mDNS packets are sent to the multicast link-local IP address.
   When the mDNS gateway starts forwarding the mDNS advertisements
   across L3 boundaries then the number of such advertisement on any
   network would increase.  Wireless networks should be optimized for
   the increase in mulitcast traffic that will be generated by extending
   the service advertisement domain.  If there are many mDNS packets
   going on air then it would impact other data traffic.  Hence mDNS
   traffic optimization is required.  One method of optimization the
   mDNS gateway could implement is sending the query reponse back as a
   L2 unicast to the requesting client.

   When services are advertised, each record has an associated TTL
   value.  When the TTL expires, the gateway needs to send a query (at
   85%, 90% and 95% of the TTL) for that record to confirm its validity.
   If the TTL value of each record is different, then mDNS gateway needs
   to send a query for individual records.  To minimize the mDNS
   traffic, queries for multiple RRs for that service record set can be
   initiated towards the source of the service.  Such a query can be
   sent with the QU bit set as described in [RFC6762] to solicit a
   unicast response.

   The mDNS gateway for wireless networks should act as a passive
   gateway as explained in Section 3.8.1.  When it is acting as a
   passive gateway and bridging of mDNS packets is turned off it has to
   respond to queries on the link even when the provider of the service
   resides on the same link.






Bhandari, et al.         Expires April 23, 2014                 [Page 9]


Internet-Draft  mDNS across local links in campus network   October 2013


4.  Challenges

   This section lists out limitations and challenges faced as part of
   the the solution described in this draft.

   1.  Name conflict resolution across links: Name conflict resolution
       depends on probing followed by service registration.  This is
       done by the host which is providing the service.  Name conflict
       resolution across links depends on the mDNS gateway cache to have
       a conclusive list of names already present to be able to
       authoritatively respond to probe requests.  However, this may not
       always be posible due to timing issues when the cache gets
       updated, records having expired from the cache etc.

   2.  Multi-homed hosts: There is also the case of a multihomed host
       connected via multiple links to the same mDNS gateway that may
       end up wrongly assuming conflict and getting into a continuous
       renaming loop.

   3.  Multiple mDNS gateways on the link: If there are multiple mDNS
       gateways enabled on the same link queries may get duplicate
       responses.

   4.  Loops in the network: If there is a loop in the network with
       multiple mDNS gateways enabled in such a topology it may end up
       continuously cycling the service around the loop and keeping the
       RRs alive forever.

   5.  Refreshing resource records: Balancing an excessive number of
       queries to maintain the records in the cache vs. having the cache
       up-to-date with all the known record names requires optimizations
       that may lead to corner cases where wrong results or conflicts
       arise.


5.  Future work

   The solution documented here is limited to extending services across
   links attached to a single network element or mDNS gateway.  For a
   broader application, the service discovery solution described in
   [I-D.cheshire-mdnsext-hybrid] should be realized with any
   provisioning as needed.

   Similar to auto provisioning and realization of the hybrid proxy
   approach for homenet as described in
   [I-D.stenberg-homenet-dnssdext-hybrid-proxy-ospf] a solution needs to
   be built for enterprise and campus networks extending what has been
   described in this draft.



Bhandari, et al.         Expires April 23, 2014                [Page 10]


Internet-Draft  mDNS across local links in campus network   October 2013


   There are other considerations such as including the location
   information so that services can be ordered based on proximity of the
   service.


6.  IANA Considerations

   This document makes no request of IANA.

   Note to RFC Editor: this section may be removed on publication as an
   RFC.


7.  Security Considerations

   N/A


8.  Acknowledgements


9.  Normative References

   [I-D.cheshire-mdnsext-hybrid]
              Cheshire, S., "Hybrid Unicast/Multicast DNS-Based Service
              Discovery", draft-cheshire-mdnsext-hybrid-02 (work in
              progress), July 2013.

   [I-D.sekar-dns-llq]
              Sekar, K., "DNS Long-Lived Queries",
              draft-sekar-dns-llq-01 (work in progress), August 2006.

   [I-D.stenberg-homenet-dnssdext-hybrid-proxy-ospf]
              Stenberg, M., "Hybrid Unicast/Multicast DNS-Based Service
              Discovery Auto-Configuration Using OSPFv3",
              draft-stenberg-homenet-dnssdext-hybrid-proxy-ospf-00 (work
              in progress), June 2013.

   [RFC1035]  Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and
              specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC6762]  Cheshire, S. and M. Krochmal, "Multicast DNS", RFC 6762,
              February 2013.

   [RFC6763]  Cheshire, S. and M. Krochmal, "DNS-Based Service



Bhandari, et al.         Expires April 23, 2014                [Page 11]


Internet-Draft  mDNS across local links in campus network   October 2013


              Discovery", RFC 6763, February 2013.


Authors' Addresses

   Shwetha Bhandari
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   Cessna Business Park, Sarjapura Marathalli Outer Ring Road
   Bangalore, KARNATAKA  560 087
   India

   Email: shwethab@cisco.com


   Bhavik Fajalia
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   Cessna Business Park, Sarjapura Marathalli Outer Ring Road
   Bangalore, KARNATAKA  560 087
   India

   Email: bfajalia@cisco.com


   Ralph Schmieder
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   City Plaza - 4th Floor
   Stuttgart, BADEN-WURTTEMBERG  70178
   Germany

   Email: rschmied@cisco.com


   Stephen Orr
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   1 Paragon Drive
   Montvale, NJ  07645
   USA

   Email: sorr@cisco.com












Bhandari, et al.         Expires April 23, 2014                [Page 12]


Internet-Draft  mDNS across local links in campus network   October 2013


   Amit Dutta
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   Cessna Business Park, Sarjapura Marathalli Outer Ring Road
   Bangalore, KARNATAKA  560 087
   India

   Email: amdutta@cisco.com












































Bhandari, et al.         Expires April 23, 2014                [Page 13]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.121, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/