[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]
Versions: 00 01 02
Network Working Group B. Harris
Internet-Draft February 2007
Intended status: Standards Track
Expires: August 5, 2007
Extended packet types for the Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer
Protocol
draft-bjh21-ssh-transport-extension-02
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 5, 2007.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
Abstract
This memo introduces a new message type into the Secure Shell (SSH)
Transport Layer Protocol whose meaning and contents are defined by a
name at the start of the message, thus allowing for further
extensions to the protocol to be implemented without using further
message numbers.
Comments are solicited and should be addressed to the mailing list at
Harris Expires August 5, 2007 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft SSH Transport Protocol Extension February 2007
<ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org> or to the author.
1. Introduction
Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC4251] is a secure remote-login protocol. Its
transport layer is designed to be extensible, and in particular the
various cryptographic algorithms that it uses are identified by
names, which are strings of up to 64 ASCII characters.
Significantly, names ending with '@' followed by a domain name are
reserved for allocation by the owner of the corresponding domain.
Individual messages in SSH, though, have their meaning specified by a
single byte at the start. Only 19 of these message numbers are
available for generic transport-layer purposes, and at the time of
writing six have already been allocated. This shortage of message
numbers, and the requirement that they be allocated by Standards
Action, increases the difficulty of developing extensions to the SSH
Transport Layer Protocol that require new messages.
This document aims to alleviate this problem by allocating one
message number for extensions to the transport layer protocol, with
the type of the packet being identified by name. This is not
intended to preclude the allocation of new message numbers for
extensions for which named messages would have an excessive
performance impact.
2. Conventions Used in this Document
The key word "MUST" in this document is to be interpreted as
described in [RFC2119].
The data types "byte" and "string" are defined in section 5 of
[RFC4251].
Other terminology and symbols have the same meaning as in [RFC4253].
3. Extension Message Format
The format of the message is:
byte SSH_MSG_TRANSPORT_EXTENSION
string extension name
... extension-specific fields
The meaning of the message and the contents of 'extension-specific
Harris Expires August 5, 2007 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft SSH Transport Protocol Extension February 2007
fields' are determined by 'extension name', which follows the
conventions described in section 4.6.1 of [RFC4250].
If an implementation receives an SSH_MSG_TRANSPORT_EXTENSION whose
'extension name' it does not recognise, it MUST treat it as if the
message number were unrecognised and return SSH_MSG_UNIMPLEMENTED as
specified in section 11.4 of [RFC4253].
4. Message Number
The following message number is defined:
SSH_MSG_TRANSPORT_EXTENSION XXX
5. Security Considerations
The security considerations in [RFC4251] apply.
6. IANA Considerations
IANA should assign a Message Number in the range 1 to 19 for
SSH_MSG_TRANSPORT_EXTENSION in accordance with section 4.1 of
[RFC4250].
IANA should maintain a register of Transport Layer Extension Packet
Names following the conventions and instructions in section 4.6 of
[RFC4250].
7. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC4250] Lehtinen, S. and C. Lonvick, "The Secure Shell (SSH)
Protocol Assigned Numbers", RFC 4250, January 2006.
[RFC4251] Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, "The Secure Shell (SSH)
Protocol Architecture", RFC 4251, January 2006.
[RFC4253] Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, "The Secure Shell (SSH)
Transport Layer Protocol", RFC 4253, January 2006.
Harris Expires August 5, 2007 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft SSH Transport Protocol Extension February 2007
Trademark Notice
"SSH" is a registered trademark in the United States.
Author's Address
Ben Harris
2a Eachard Road
CAMBRIDGE CB3 0HY
GB
Email: bjh21@bjh21.me.uk
Harris Expires August 5, 2007 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft SSH Transport Protocol Extension February 2007
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
Harris Expires August 5, 2007 [Page 5]
Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129d, available from
https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/