[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02 draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount

Network Working Group                                       M. Bjorklund
Internet-Draft                                            Tail-f Systems
Intended status: Standards Track                       February 26, 2016
Expires: August 29, 2016


                         YANG Structural Mount
               draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount-02

Abstract

   This document defines a mechanism to combine YANG modules into the
   schema defined in other YANG modules.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 29, 2016.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.






Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
       1.1.1.  Tree Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Background  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Structural Mount  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.1.  Augment and Validation in Mounted Data  . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.2.  Top-level RPCs  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.3.  Top-level Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   4.  Data Model  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   5.  Structural Mount YANG Module  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
   7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
   8.  Contributors  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   9.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     9.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     9.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   Appendix A.  Example: Logical Devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   Appendix B.  Example: Network Manager . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     B.1.  Invoking an RPC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
   Appendix C.  Open Issues  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
   Appendix D.  Alternative solutions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     D.1.  Static Mount Points with YANG Library Only  . . . . . . .  16
     D.2.  Dynamic Mount Points with YANG Library Only . . . . . . .  18
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19

1.  Introduction

1.1.  Terminology

   The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14, [RFC2119].

1.1.1.  Tree Diagrams

   A simplified graphical representation of the data model is used in
   this document.  The meaning of the symbols in these diagrams is as
   follows:

   o  Brackets "[" and "]" enclose list keys.

   o  Abbreviations before data node names: "rw" means configuration
      data (read-write) and "ro" state data (read-only).





Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


   o  Symbols after data node names: "?" means an optional node, "!"
      means a presence container, and "*" denotes a list and leaf-list.

   o  Parentheses enclose choice and case nodes, and case nodes are also
      marked with a colon (":").

   o  Ellipsis ("...") stands for contents of subtrees that are not
      shown.

2.  Background

   YANG has two mechanisms for extending a data model with additional
   nodes; "uses" and "augment".  The "uses" statement explicitly
   incorporates the contents of a "grouping" defined in some other
   module.  The "augment" statement explicitly adds contents to a target
   node defined in some other module.  In both these cases, the source
   and/or target model explicitly defines the relationship between the
   models.

   In some cases these mechanisms are not sufficient.  For example,
   suppose we have a model like ietf-interfaces [RFC7223] that is
   defined to be implemented in a device.  Now suppose we want to model
   a device that supports multiple logical devices
   [I-D.rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model], where each such logical device
   has its own instantiation of ietf-interfaces (and other models), but
   at the same time, we'd like to be able to manage all these logical
   devices from the main device.  We would like something like this:

     +--rw interfaces
     | +--rw interface* [name]
     |    ...
     +--rw logical-device* [name]
        +--rw name             string
        |   ...
        +--rw interfaces
          +--rw interface* [name]
             ...

   With the "uses" approach, ietf-interfaces would have to define a
   grouping with all its nodes, and the new model for logical devices
   would have to use this grouping.  This is a not a scalable solution,
   since every time there is a new model defined, we would have to
   update our model for logical devices to use a grouping from the new
   model.  Another problem is that this approach cannot handle vendor-
   specific modules.

   With the "augment" approach, ietf-interfaces would have to augment
   the logical-device list with all its nodes, and at the same time



Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


   define all its nodes on the top-level.  This approach is also not
   scalable, since there may be other models to which we would like to
   add the interface list.

3.  Structural Mount

   The structural mount mechanism defined in this document takes a
   different approach to the extensibility problem described in the
   previous section.  It decouples the definition of the relation
   between the source and target models from the definitions of the
   models themselves.

   This is accomplished with a YANG extension statement that is used to
   specify a mount point in a data model.  The purpose of a mount point
   is to define a place in the node hierarchy where other YANG data
   models may be attached, without any special notation in the other
   YANG data models.

   For each mount point supported by a server, the server populates an
   operational state node hierarchy with information about which models
   it has mounted.  This node hierarchy can be read by a client in order
   to learn what is implemented on a server.

   Structural mount applies to the schema, and specifically does not
   assume anything about how the mounted data is implemented.  It may be
   implemented using the same instrumentation as the rest of the system,
   or it may be implemented by querying some other system.  Future
   specifications may define mechanisms to control or monitor the
   implementation of specific mount points.

   This document allows mounting of complete data models only.  Other
   specifications may extend this model by defining additional
   mechanisms, for example mounting of sub-hierarchies of a module.

3.1.  Augment and Validation in Mounted Data

   All paths (in leafrefs, instance-identifiers, XPath expressions, and
   target nodes of augments) in the data models mounted at a mount point
   are interpreted with the mount point as the root node, and the
   mounted data nodes as its children.  This means that data within a
   mounted subtree can never refer to data outside of this subtree.

3.2.  Top-level RPCs

   If any mounted data model defines RPCs, these RPCs can be invoked by
   clients by treating them as actions defined where the mount point is
   specified.




Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


3.3.  Top-level Notifications

   If the server emits a notification defined at the top-level in any
   mounted data model, it is treated as if the notification was attached
   to the data node where the mount point is specified.

4.  Data Model

   This document defines the YANG 1.1 module
   [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis] "ietf-yang-structural-mount", which has
   the following structure:

   module: ietf-yang-structural-mount
      +--ro mount-points
         +--ro mount-point* [module name]
            +--ro module                 yang:yang-identifier
            +--ro name                   yang:yang-identifier
            +--ro (data-model)
               +--:(inline-yang-library)
               |  +--ro inline-yang-library?   empty
               +--:(modules)
                  +--ro modules
                     +--ro module* [name revision]
                        +--ro name                yang:yang-identifier
                        +--ro revision            union
                        +--ro schema?             inet:uri
                        +--ro namespace           inet:uri
                        +--ro feature*            yang:yang-identifier
                        +--ro deviation* [name revision]
                        |  +--ro name        yang:yang-identifier
                        |  +--ro revision    union
                        +--ro conformance-type    enumeration
                        +--ro submodules
                           +--ro submodule* [name revision]
                              +--ro name        yang:yang-identifier
                              +--ro revision    union
                              +--ro schema?     inet:uri

5.  Structural Mount YANG Module

   <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-yang-structural-mount@2016-02-26.yang"

  module ietf-yang-structural-mount {
    yang-version 1.1;
    namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-structural-mount";
    prefix yangmnt;

    import ietf-yang-types {



Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


      prefix yang;
    }
    import ietf-yang-library {
      prefix yanglib;
    }

    organization
      "IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modeling Language) Working Group";

    contact
      "WG Web:   <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/>
       WG List:  <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>

       WG Chair: Thomas Nadeau
                 <mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>

       WG Chair: Juergen Schoenwaelder
                 <mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>

       WG Chair: Kent Watsen
                 <mailto:kwatsen@juniper.net>

       Editor:   Martin Bjorklund
                 <mailto:mbj@tail-f.com>";


    // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
    // note.
    description
      "This module defines a YANG extension statement that can be used
       to incorporate data models defined in other YANG modules in a
       module.  It also defines a operational state data so that
       clients can learn which data models a server implements for the
       mount points.

       Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
       authors of the code.  All rights reserved.

       Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
       without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
       the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
       forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
       Relating to IETF Documents
       (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).

       The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
       NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and
       'OPTIONAL' in the module text are to be interpreted as described



Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016                [Page 6]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


       in RFC 2119 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119).

       This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
       (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for
       full legal notices.";

    // RFC Ed.: update the date below with the date of RFC publication
    // and remove this note.
    revision 2016-02-26 {
      description
        "Initial revision.";
      reference
        "RFC XXXX: YANG Structural Mount";
    }

    /*
     * Extension statements
     */

    extension mount-point {
      argument name;
      description
        "The argument 'name' is a yang-identifier.  The name of
         the mount point MUST be unique within the module where it
         is defined.

         The 'mount-point' statement can be present in 'container' and
         'list'.

         If a mount point is defined in a grouping, its name is bound
         to the module where the grouping is used.  Note that this
         implies that such a grouping can be used at most once in a
         module.

         A mount point defines a place in the node hierarchy where
         other data models may be attached.  A server that implements
         a module with a mount point, populates the
         /mount-points/mount-point list with detailed information on
         which data models are mounted at each mount point.

         The 'mount-yang-library' extension may be used as a
         substatement to 'mount-point'.";
    }

    extension mount-yang-library {
      description
        "The presence of this statement as a substatement to
         'mount-point' indicates that the data model defined in the



Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016                [Page 7]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


         module 'ietf-yang-library' is mounted.  When this statement is
         present, a client can discover the mounted YANG modules by
         reading from the mounted 'ietf-yang-library' data.

         This statement is useful if the mount point is defined in a
         list and different list entries may mount a different
         set of modules.";
    }

    /*
     * Operational state data nodes
     */

    container mount-points {
      config false;
      description
        "Contains information about which mount points are implemented
         in the server, and their data models.";

      list mount-point {
        key "module name";
        description
          "Contains information about which data models are implemented
           for the mountpoint 'name' defined in 'module'.";

        leaf module {
          type yang:yang-identifier;
          description
            "The name of the module where the mount point is defined.";
        }
        leaf name {
          type yang:yang-identifier;
          description
            "The name of the mount point.";
        }
        choice data-model {
          mandatory true;
          description
            "Indicates which data models the server implements
             for this mount point.

             It is expected that this choice may be augmented with other
             data model discovery mechansisms.";

          leaf inline-yang-library {
            type empty;
            description
              "This leaf indicates that the server has mounted



Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016                [Page 8]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


               'ietf-yang-library' at the mount point, and that the
               instantiation of 'ietf-yang-library' contains the
               information about which modules are mounted.

               This is useful if the mount point is defined in a
               list and different list entries may mount a different
               set of modules.";
          }

          container modules {
            description
              "The 'module' list contains the set of modules that are
               mounted at the mount point.";

            uses yanglib:module-list;
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }

   <CODE ENDS>

6.  IANA Considerations

   This document registers a URI in the IETF XML registry [RFC3688].
   Following the format in RFC 3688, the following registration is
   requested to be made.

        URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-structural-mount

        Registrant Contact: The IESG.

        XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.

   This document registers a YANG module in the YANG Module Names
   registry [RFC6020].

     name:        ietf-yang-structural-mount
     namespace:   urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-structural-mount
     prefix:      yangmnt
     reference:   RFC XXXX

7.  Security Considerations

   TBD





Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016                [Page 9]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


8.  Contributors

   The idea of having some way to combine schemas from different YANG
   modules into one has been proposed independently by several groups of
   people: Alexander Clemm, Jan Medved, and Eric Voit
   ([I-D.clemm-netmod-mount]); Ladislav Lhotka
   ([I-D.lhotka-netmod-ysdl]); and Lou Berger and Christian Hopps.

9.  References

9.1.  Normative References

   [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis]
              Bjorklund, M., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
              draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-11 (work in progress),
              February 2016.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC3688]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.

   [RFC6020]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
              the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.

9.2.  Informative References

   [I-D.clemm-netmod-mount]
              Clemm, A., Medved, J., and E. Voit, "Mounting YANG-Defined
              Information from Remote Datastores", draft-clemm-netmod-
              mount-03 (work in progress), April 2015.

   [I-D.lhotka-netmod-ysdl]
              Lhotka, L., "YANG Schema Dispatching Language", draft-
              lhotka-netmod-ysdl-00 (work in progress), November 2015.

   [I-D.rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model]
              Lindem, A., Berger, L., Bogdanovic, D., and C. Hopps,
              "Network Device YANG Organizational Models", draft-
              rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-03 (work in progress),
              February 2016.




Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016               [Page 10]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


   [RFC6241]  Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
              and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
              (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.

   [RFC7223]  Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface
              Management", RFC 7223, DOI 10.17487/RFC7223, May 2014,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7223>.

   [RFC7277]  Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for IP Management",
              RFC 7277, DOI 10.17487/RFC7277, June 2014,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7277>.

   [RFC7317]  Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "A YANG Data Model for
              System Management", RFC 7317, DOI 10.17487/RFC7317, August
              2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7317>.

Appendix A.  Example: Logical Devices

   Logical devices within a device typically use the same set of data
   models in each instance.  This can be modelled with a mount point:

   module example-logical-devices {
     namespace "urn:example:logical-devices";
     prefix exld;

     import ietf-yang-structural-mount {
       prefix yangmnt;
     }

     container logical-devices {
       list logical-device {
         key name;
         leaf name {
           type string;
         }

         yangmnt:mount-point logical-device;
       }
     }
   }

   A server with two logical devices that both implement
   "ietf-interfaces" [RFC7223], "ietf-ip" [RFC7277], and "ietf-system"
   [RFC7317] YANG modules might populate the "mount-points" container
   with:





Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016               [Page 11]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


   <mount-points
     xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-structural-mount">
     <mount-point>
       <module>example-logical-devices</module>
       <name>logical-device</name>
       <modules>
         <module>
           <name>ietf-interface</name>
           <revision>2014-05-08</revision>
           <namespace>
             urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces
           </namespace>
           <conformance-type>implement</conformance-type>
         </module>
         <module>
           <name>ietf-ip</name>
           <revision>2014-06-16</revision>
           <namespace>
             urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ip
           </namespace>
           <conformance-type>implement</conformance-type>
         </module>
         <module>
           <name>ietf-system</name>
           <revision>2014-08-06</revision>
           <namespace>
             urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-system
           </namespace>
           <conformance-type>implement</conformance-type>
         </module>
         <module>
           <name>ietf-yang-types</name>
           <revision>2013-07-15</revision>
           <namespace>
             urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-types
           </namespace>
           <conformance-type>import</conformance-type>
         </module>
       </modules>
     </mount-point>
   </mount-points>

   and the "logical-devices" container might have:








Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016               [Page 12]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


   <logical-devices xmlns="urn:example:logical-devices">
     <logical-device>
       <name>vrtrA</name>
       <interfaces
           xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces">
         <interface>
           <name>eth0</name>
             <ipv6 xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ip">
               <enabled>true</enabled>
               ...
             </ipv6>
           ...
         </interface>
       </interfaces>
       <system xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-system">
         ...
       </system>
     </logical-device>
     <logical-device>
       <name>vrtrB</name>
       <interfaces
           xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces">
         <interface>
           <name>eth0</name>
             <ipv6 xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ip">
               <enabled>true</enabled>
               ...
             </ipv6>
           ...
         </interface>
       </interfaces>
       <system xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-system">
         ...
       </system>
     </logical-device>
   </logical-devices>

Appendix B.  Example: Network Manager

   This example shows how a Network Manager application can use
   structural mount to define a data model with all its managed devices.
   Structural mount is used to mount the data models each device
   supports, and these data models can be discovered by a client via the
   "ietf-yang-library" module that is mounted for each device.







Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016               [Page 13]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


   module example-network-manager {
     namespace "urn:example:network-manager";
     prefix exnm;

     import ietf-inet-types {
       prefix inet;
     }
     import ietf-yang-structural-mount {
       prefix yangmnt;
     }

     container managed-devices {
       description
         "The managed devices and device communication settings.";

       list device {
         key name;
         leaf name {
           type string;
         }
         choice transport {
           mandatory true;
           container netconf {
             leaf address {
               type inet:ip-address;
               mandatory true;
             }
             container authentication {
               // ...
             }
           }
           container restconf {
             leaf address {
               type inet:ip-address;
               mandatory true;
             }
             // ...
           }
         }

         container root {
           yangmnt:mount-point managed-device {
             yangmnt:mount-yang-library;
           }
         }
       }
     }
   }



Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016               [Page 14]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


   The "devices" container might have:

   <devices xmlns="urn:example:network-manager">
     <device>
       <name>rtrA</name>
       <transport>
         <netconf>
           <address>192.0.2.2</address>
           <authentication>
             ...
           </authentication>
           ...
         </netconf>
         <root>
           <modules-state
               xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-library">
             <module>
               <name>ietf-system</name>
               ...
             </module>
           </modules-state>
           <system xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-system">
             ...
           </system>
         </root>
       </transport>
     </device>
     <device>
       <name>rtrB</name>
       <transport>
         <restconf>
           <address>192.0.2.3</address>
           <authentication>
             ...
           </authentication>
           ...
         </restconf>
         <root>
           <modules-state
               xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-library">
             <module>
               <name>ietf-interfaces</name>
               ...
             </module>
           </modules-state>
           <interfaces
               xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces">
             ...



Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016               [Page 15]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


           </interfaces>
         </root>
       </transport>
     </device>
   </devices>

B.1.  Invoking an RPC

   A client that wants to invoke the "restart" operation [RFC7317] on
   the managed device "rtrA" over NETCONF [RFC6241] can send:

   <rpc message-id="101"
        xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
     <action xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:1">
       <managed-devices xmlns="urn:example:network-manager">
         <device>
           <name>rtrA</name>
           <system xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-system">
             <restart/>
           </system>
         </device>
       </managed-devices>
     </action>
   </rpc>

Appendix C.  Open Issues

   o  Is there a use case for specifying modules that are required to be
      mounted under a mount point?

   o  Do we really need the case where ietf-yang-library is not mounted?
      The solution would be simpler if we always use ietf-yang-library
      at every mount point.  See Appendix D.1.

   o  Support non-named mount points? (ysdl case) See Appendix D.2.

Appendix D.  Alternative solutions

   This section discusses some alternative solution ideas.

D.1.  Static Mount Points with YANG Library Only

   This solution supports named mount points, and always use ietf-yang-
   library.

   There would be just one single extension statement, and no additional
   operational state data:




Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016               [Page 16]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


     extension mount-point {
       argument name;
     }

   Data models need to be prepared with this extension:

     container logical-devices {
       list logical-device {
         key name;
         ...
         yangmnt:mount-point logical-device;
       }
     }

   The tree on the server from Appendix A would look like this:

     "example-logical-devices:logical-devices": {
       "logical-device": [
         {
           "name": "vrtrA",
           "ietf-yang-library:modules-state": {
             "module-set-id": "ef50fe1",
             "module": [
               {
                 "name": "ietf-interfaces",
                  ...
               },
               {
                 "name": "ietf-system",
                  ...
               }
             ]
           },
           "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": {
             ...
           },
           "ietf-system:system": {
             ...
           }
         },
         {
           "name": "vrtrB",
           "ietf-yang-library:modules-state": {
             ...
           }
         }
       ]
     }



Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016               [Page 17]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


D.2.  Dynamic Mount Points with YANG Library Only

   This solution supports only non-named mount points, and always use
   ietf-yang-library.

   There would be no extension statement.  Instead, the server would
   populate a list of dynamic mount points.  Each such mount point MUST
   mount ietf-yang-library.

     container mount-points {
       config false;
       list mount-point {
         key path;
         leaf path {
           type schema-node-path;
         }
       }
     }

   The tree on the server from Appendix A would look like this:































Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016               [Page 18]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


     "ietf-yang-structural-mount:mount-points": {
       "mount-point": [
         { "path": "/exld:logical-devices/exld:logical-device" }
       ]
     },
     "example-logical-devices:logical-devices": {
       "logical-device": [
         {
           "name": "vrtrA",
           "ietf-yang-library:modules-state": {
             "module-set-id": "ef50fe1",
             "module": [
               {
                 "name": "ietf-interfaces",
                  ...
               },
               {
                 "name": "ietf-system",
                  ...
               }
             ]
           },
           "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": {
             ...
           },
           "ietf-system:system": {
             ...
           }
         },
         {
           "name": "vrtrB",
           "ietf-yang-library:modules-state": {
             ...
           }
         }
       ]
     }

   A client needs to read the "/mount-points/mount-point" list in order
   to learn where the server has mounted data models.  Next, it needs to
   read the "modules-state" subtree for each instantiated mount point in
   order to learn which modules are mounted at that instance.

Author's Address







Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016               [Page 19]


Internet-Draft            YANG Structural Mount            February 2016


   Martin Bjorklund
   Tail-f Systems

   Email: mbj@tail-f.com















































Bjorklund                Expires August 29, 2016               [Page 20]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.128, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/