[Docs] [txt|pdf|xml|html] [Tracker] [Email] [Nits]

Versions: 01 00

Network Working Group                                      S. Bortzmeyer
Internet-Draft                                                     AFNIC
Intended status: Experimental                          February 18, 2013
Expires: August 22, 2013


                   JSON format to represent DNS data
                      draft-bortzmeyer-dns-json-00

Abstract

   This document describes a profile of JSON to represent DNS data.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 22, 2013.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2



Bortzmeyer              Expires August 22, 2013                 [Page 1]


Internet-Draft                DNS in JSON                  February 2013


   2.  Requirements notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  The format  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     3.1.  General rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.2.  Resource records  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.3.  DNS response  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     3.4.  Zone file . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     3.5.  Examples  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     3.6.  Open questions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   4.  Security considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   5.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     5.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     5.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9

1.  Introduction

   The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) format is specified in
   [RFC4627].  It is a structured data format suitable for a wide range
   of applications.  It is specially popular on the Web, due to its
   JavaScript roots, but can be found in many other contexts.

   The Domain Name System (DNS) is specified in [RFC1034] and [RFC1035].
   It is one of the most important infrastructure components of the
   Internet.  DNS data is today typically exchanged using two formats:
   the "zone file" format (partially) described in section 5 of
   [RFC1035] and the "wire format" of the section 4 for [RFC1035].
   Other formats have been suggested, for an easier exchange of data, or
   for using DNS in new applications, such as DNS "looking glasses" or
   gateways to get DNS data over protocols such as HTTP ([RFC2616]).

   For instance, a mechanism have been suggested for DNS data in XML, in
   [xml-data-schema].

   This document suggests using the JSON format to represent DNS data.

2.  Requirements notation

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

3.  The format









Bortzmeyer              Expires August 22, 2013                 [Page 2]


Internet-Draft                DNS in JSON                  February 2013


3.1.  General rules

   Most data is represented by JSON objects, with their named members.
   It is common to omit some of these members, to save bandwidth or by
   pure lazyness.  So, clients who consume this sort of JSON objects
   should not assume every member is present.  THIS IS AN IMPORTANT RULE
   (see Section 3.6, Paragraph 2 for a discussion).

3.2.  Resource records

   DNS resource records are JSON objects.  The following members are
   common to all record types:

   o  Name (owner name)

   o  Type

   o  Class

   o  Time to live (TTL)

   The other members depend on the record type.  The following list
   gives the resource record type mnenomic and the JSON members for this
   type:

   o  A:

      *  Address

   o  AAAA:

      *  Address

   o  MX:

      *  Preference

      *  MailExchanger

   o  NS:

      *  Target

   o  PTR:

      *  Target

   o  CNAME:



Bortzmeyer              Expires August 22, 2013                 [Page 3]


Internet-Draft                DNS in JSON                  February 2013


      *  Target

   o  SOA:

      *  MaintainerName

      *  MasterServerName

      *  Serial

      *  Refresh

      *  Retry

      *  Expire

      *  NegativeTtl

   o  DNSKEY:

      *  Algorithm

      *  Length

      *  Flags

      *  Tag

   o  DS:

      *  DelegationKey

      *  DigestType

   o  DLV:

      *  DelegationKey

      *  DigestType

   o  NSEC3PARAM:

      *  Algorihm

      *  Flags

      *  Salt




Bortzmeyer              Expires August 22, 2013                 [Page 4]


Internet-Draft                DNS in JSON                  February 2013


      *  Iterations

   o  SSHFP:

      *  Algorithm

      *  DigestType

      *  Fingerprint

   o  NAPTR:

      *  Flags

      *  Order

      *  Services

      *  Preference

      *  Regexp

      *  Replacement

   o  SRV:

      *  Server

      *  Port

      *  Priority

      *  Weight

   o  LOC:

      *  Longitude

      *  Latitude

      *  Altitude

   o  SPF:

      *  Text

   Note there is no concept of resource record sets (see Section 3.6,
   Paragraph 3 for a discussion).



Bortzmeyer              Expires August 22, 2013                 [Page 5]


Internet-Draft                DNS in JSON                  February 2013


3.3.  DNS response

   A DNS response is represented as a JSON object with a member named
   "Query".  The main members of this object (the names are self-
   explanatory) are:

   o  QuestionSection

   o  AnswerSection

   o  AdditionalSection

   o  AuthoritySection

   o  ReturnCode (alphabetical, e.g.  NOERROR, NXDOMAIN, SERVFAIL, etc)

   o  ID

   o  AA (Authoritative Answer)

   o  TC (TrunCation)

   o  RD (Recursion Desired)

   o  RA (Recursion Available)

   o  AD (Authentic Data)

   o  Query

   The Question Section is an object with members Qname, Qtype and
   Qclass.  The other three sections are JSON arrays, each DNS record is
   an item in the array.  They may be empty arrays (for instance, if the
   request returns NOERROR,ANSWER=0, the AnswerSection will be an empty
   array).

   The Query object has members about the query: Duration is the time
   taken to process the request, Server the resolver used (preferably as
   an IP address).

3.4.  Zone file

   A DNS zone file is represented as a JSON object with a member named
   "Zone".  The main member of this object is an array of resource
   records.

   The member "Name" cannot be ommitted in resource records (unlike the
   text format of [RFC1035], JSON does not guarantee the order of



Bortzmeyer              Expires August 22, 2013                 [Page 6]


Internet-Draft                DNS in JSON                  February 2013


   records, so the trick of "previous resource record" does not work.
   But you can use relative names, and @ to denote the origin.

3.5.  Examples

   {"Query": {"Server": "127.0.0.1"},
    "AnswerSection": [
          {"Name": "bortzmeyer.fr.",
           "MasterServerName": "ns3.bortzmeyer.org.",
           "MaintainerName": "hostmaster.bortzmeyer.org.", "TTL": 3600,
           "Serial": 2012060801, "Type": "SOA"}],
    "ReturnCode": "NOERROR",
    "AD": true,
    "QuestionSection": {"Qtype": "SOA", "Qname": "bortzmeyer.fr."}}
   }

                   An answer with a SOA resource record

   {"Query": {"Duration": "0.167317", "Server": "127.0.0.1"},
    "AnswerSection": [
       {"TTL": 6666, "Type": "AAAA",
        "Address": "2a03:2880:10:8f01:face:b00c::25"},
       {"TTL": 6666, "Type": "AAAA",
        "Address": "2a03:2880:2110:3f01:face:b00c::"},
       {"TTL": 6666, "Type": "AAAA",
        "Address": "2a03:2880:10:1f02:face:b00c::25"}],
    "ReturnCode": "NOERROR"}

                  An answer with several resource records

   {"Zone": {"Origin": "isi.edu"},
    [
        {"Type": "SOA", "Name": "@",
         "MasterServerName": "venera",
         "MaintainerName": "action.domains.",
         "Serial": 20},
        {"Type": "NS", Name": "@",
         "Target": "a.isi.edu"},
        {"Type": "NS", Name": "@",
         "Target": "venera"},
        {"Type": "NS", Name": "@",
         "Target": "vaxa"},
        {"Type": "MX", Name": "@",
         "MailExchanger": "venera",
         "Preference": 10},
        {"Type": "MX", Name": "@",
         "MailExchanger": "vaxa",
         "Preference": 20},



Bortzmeyer              Expires August 22, 2013                 [Page 7]


Internet-Draft                DNS in JSON                  February 2013


        {"Type": "A", Name": "a",
         "Address": "26.3.0.103"},
        {"Type": "A", Name": "venera",
         "Address": "10.1.0.52"},
        {"Type": "A", Name": "venera",
         "Address": "128.9.0.32"}
    ]
   }

                         The zone file of RFC 1035

3.6.  Open questions

   Would it be a good idea to document a formal way to derive member
   names for the resource record JSON objects?  It would allow 1) to
   document the rationale for the current names 2) to automatically
   allow representation of new DNS resource records.

   Should we define mandatory members for some objects, in order to have
   something the consumers can rely on?

   In resource records objects, members such as TTL are redundant (since
   they are actually RRset-wide).  Should we have a new level of
   objects, for RRsets?

   Should we use JSON schema ([json-schema]) to define the profile?

   Should we add a normative reference to every RFC describing one of
   the RR types used here?

4.  Security considerations

   These JSON documents are not signed and therefore not authentified,
   even if the original data was secured with DNSSEC.  If transported
   over an insecure transport, they can be read by a sniffer.

   Also, see the security considerations of [RFC4627].

5.  References

5.1.  Normative References

   [RFC1034]  Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities",
              STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987.

   [RFC1035]  Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and
              specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987.




Bortzmeyer              Expires August 22, 2013                 [Page 8]


Internet-Draft                DNS in JSON                  February 2013


   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC4627]  Crockford, D., "The application/json Media Type for
              JavaScript Object Notation (JSON)", RFC 4627, July 2006.

5.2.  Informative References

   [RFC2616]  Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H.,
              Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext
              Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.

   [xml-data-schema]
              Parthasarath, M. and P. Vixie, "draft-mohan-dns-query-
              xml-00", September 2011.

   [json-schema]
              Galiegue, F., Zyp, K., and G. Court, "draft-zyp-json-
              schema-04.txt: JSON Schema: core definitions and
              terminology", January 2013.

Author's Address

   Stephane Bortzmeyer
   AFNIC
   Immeuble International
   Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines  78181
   France

   Phone: +33 1 39 30 83 46
   Email: bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr
   URI:   http://www.afnic.fr/


















Bortzmeyer              Expires August 22, 2013                 [Page 9]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.124, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/