[Docs] [txt|pdf|xml|html] [Tracker] [Email] [Nits]
Versions: 00 01
Network Working Group M. Dempsky
Internet-Draft OpenDNS, Inc.
Intended status: Standards Track August 26, 2009
Expires: February 27, 2010
DNSCurve: Link-level security for the Domain Name System
draft-dempsky-dnscurve-00
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on February 27, 2010.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of
publication of this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document.
Abstract
This document describes DNSCurve, a protocol extension that adds
link-level security to the Domain Name System (DNS).
Dempsky Expires February 27, 2010 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft DNSCurve: Link-level security for DNS August 2009
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Base-32 encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. Encoding public keys in name server names . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. Nonce generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6. DNSCurve expanded formats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6.1. Streamlined format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6.2. TXT format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. UDP and TCP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8. Security considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9. IANA considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
10. Normative references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Dempsky Expires February 27, 2010 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft DNSCurve: Link-level security for DNS August 2009
1. Introduction
DNSCurve adds link-level security to the Domain Name System (DNS).
It includes a key distribution mechanism compatible with today's name
server software and registry services, and two packet formats: a
simple streamlined format requiring minimal packet overhead and a
mostly backwards-compatible format intended for use with strict
firewalls and DNS proxies.
DNSCurve packets include a cryptographic MAC to provide integrity and
availability. Clients can be confident that verified responses came
from the appropriate server and were not forged by a blind or even
sniffing attacker, while servers can be confident that responses will
not be replayed against other unintended clients. Additionally,
DNSCurve packets are encrypted to provide some confidentiality.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
2. Overview
DNSCurve uses Curve25519XSalsa20Poly1305, a particular combination of
the Curve25519, Salsa20, and Poly1305 primitives as described in
[naclcrypto]. In particular, it is a cryptosystem featuring 256-bit
public and secret keys, 192-bit nonces, and 128-bit authenticators.
Each DNSCurve client and server has a secret key and a corresponding
public key. DNSCurve servers distribute their public keys by
encoding them in name server names embedded in standard DNS NS
records. DNSCurve clients distribute their public keys by including
them in their query packets.
When a DNSCurve client is about to send a DNS query to a name server,
if the name contains a DNSCurve public key, it can instead use this
public key along with its own secret key and a nonce to protect its
query in a "cryptographic box" as described in [naclcrypto]. The
client then encodes this cryptographic box along with the nonce and
its own public key as an expanded DNSCurve query packet, which it
sends to the DNSCurve server.
Upon receiving a DNS query packet, a DNSCurve name server first
checks if it appears to be an expanded DNSCurve query packet. If
not, then it responds normally. Otherwise, it extracts the client's
DNSCurve public key, nonce, and boxed query, and attempts to open the
box using the public key and nonce and its own secret key. If this
fails (i.e., the authenticator is invalid), then the packet is not an
Dempsky Expires February 27, 2010 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft DNSCurve: Link-level security for DNS August 2009
expanded DNSCurve query packet, and the server responds as a normal
DNS query.
Otherwise, if the unboxing succeeds, then the server discovers the
client's original query packet. To send a response, the server
chooses a nonce extension to append to the client-chosen nonce, and
protects its response packet in a cryptographic box using the same
keys and the extended nonce. The server then encodes this
cryptographic box as an expanded DNSCurve response packet, which it
sends to the DNSCurve client.
Meanwhile, the DNSCurve client waits for an expanded DNSCurve
response packet. If it receives a non-DNSCurve response packet, an
expanded DNSCurve response packet with an invalid nonce (i.e., not an
extension of its original nonce) or an invalid cryptographic box
(i.e., cannot be opened using the same keys and the extended nonce),
then it discards the packet and continues waiting. Once it receives
a valid expanded DNSCurve response packet, it opens the cryptographic
box to discover the server's original DNS response.
3. Base-32 encoding
Sometimes DNSCurve communicates arbitrary byte strings inside domain
names. While the DNS protocol is 8-bit safe for names and labels
(except for case-insensitive handling of ASCII alphabetic
characters), many tools have trouble with arbitrary characters in
domain names, in particular domain registrar software. To cope with
this limitation, DNSCurve encodes byte strings using a set of safe
alphanumeric characters.
In DNSCurve's base-32 encoding, a byte string is interpreted as a
number in little-endian form. Each 5-bit sequence of this number,
from least significant to most significant, is encoded as one of the
standard "digits" "0123456789bcdfghjklmnpqrstuvwxyz". A final
sequence of fewer than 5 bits is zero-extended before encoding.
Decoders MUST accept "BCDFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZ" as synonyms for
"bcdfghjklmnpqrstuvwxyz".
For example, the two-byte string with bytes {0x64,0x88} (i.e.,
{100,136} decimal) is interpreted as the integer 0x8864 (i.e.,
34916). The bits 1000100001100100 of this integer are divided into
5-bit parts 00100, 00011, 00010, 00001, which in turn are encoded as
"4", "3", "2", "1". The original string is therefore encoded as the
string "4321".
N.B., this is not the same encoding as defined in [RFC4648]. In
particular, the byte string is chunked into 5-bit sequences
Dempsky Expires February 27, 2010 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft DNSCurve: Link-level security for DNS August 2009
differently, and a different alphabet is used. The first allows
DNSCurve public keys to be encoded slightly more compactly (see
Section 4), and the second helps to further prevent false positives
when searching for base-32 encoded strings in domain names.
3.1. Examples
+-------------------------------------------+------------------+
| Byte string | Base-32 encoding |
+-------------------------------------------+------------------+
| {} | "" |
| {0x88} | "84" |
| {0x9f,0x0b} | "zw20" |
| {0x17,0xa3,0xd4} | "rs89f" |
| {0x2a,0xa9,0x13,0x7e} | "b9b71z1" |
| {0x7e,0x69,0xa3,0xef,0xac} | "ycu6urmp" |
| {0xe5,0x3b,0x60,0xe8,0x15,0x62} | "5zg06nr223" |
| {0x72,0x3c,0xef,0x3a,0x43,0x2c,0x8f} | "l3hygxd8dt31" |
| {0x17,0xf7,0x35,0x09,0x41,0xe4,0xdc,0x01} | "rsxcm44847r30" |
+-------------------------------------------+------------------+
4. Encoding public keys in name server names
DNSCurve public keys are encoded in name server names as a 54-byte
label consisting of the magic string "uz5" followed by the first 51
bytes of the base-32 encoding of the public key. (Curve25519 public
keys are actually 255-bit integers in little-endian, so the 52nd byte
of the base-32 encoding will always be "0".)
When a DNSCurve client is searching a name server name for a DNSCurve
public key, it MUST check every label for an encoded public key. If
multiple public keys are found, the left-most label MUST be chosen.
String comparison with "uz5" MUST be performed case-insensitively.
5. Nonce generation
For every request, DNSCurve clients generate a 96-bit nonce, and for
every response, DNSCurve servers generate a 96-bit nonce extension.
Nonces MUST be unique for distinct packets for the same client-server
key pair. A simple way to achieve this is to choose a unique nonce
for each packet and for each retransmission. Additionally, servers
MUST use a non-zero nonce extension (because nonces are zero extended
in query packets). Clients and servers may otherwise generate nonces
however they choose.
Two recommended ways to generate a 96-bit nonce or nonce extension
Dempsky Expires February 27, 2010 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft DNSCurve: Link-level security for DNS August 2009
are
1. a 64-bit counter (starting at 1) followed by a 32-bit random
number and
2. a 64-bit timestamp (e.g., nanoseconds since 1970) followed by a
32-bit random number.
In either case the 64-bit value MUST NOT decrease even if the
software restarts or the system clock jumps backwards.
If multiple clients or multiple servers share a DNSCurve secret key,
then they MUST make sure no two separate clients or servers generate
the same nonce. A simple way to achieve this is to use nonce
separation; e.g., one server uses only even nonces and the other uses
only odd nonces.
6. DNSCurve expanded formats
DNSCurve defines two expanded formats: "streamlined" and "TXT". Each
includes a format for expanded queries and a format for expanded
responses. DNSCurve clients may send DNSCurve expanded queries using
whichever format it chooses, but they are encouraged to use the
streamlined format when possible. A DNSCurve server MUST support
DNSCurve expanded queries in either format and MUST send expanded
responses using the corresponding format.
6.1. Streamlined format
An expanded query packet in streamlined format has the following
bytes:
o 8 bytes: the magic string "Q6fnvWj8".
o 32 bytes: the client's DNSCurve public key.
o 12 bytes: a client-selected nonce for this packet.
o A cryptographic box containing the original DNS query packet.
An expanded response packet in streamlined format has the following
bytes:
o 8 bytes: the magic string "R6fnvWJ8".
o 12 bytes: the client's nonce.
Dempsky Expires February 27, 2010 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft DNSCurve: Link-level security for DNS August 2009
o 12 bytes: a server-selected nonce extension.
o A cryptographic box containing the original DNS response packet.
Note that this streamlined response format does not repeat the
client's query name, and in particular does not repeat the client's
public key. However, it does repeat the client's nonce.
6.2. TXT format
The "TXT" format receives its name from the fact that expanded query
and response packets in this format appear to casual inspection to be
standard DNS packets with two possible exceptions: 1) the query name
exceed 255 bytes and 2) the total packet may exceed 512 bytes.
When encoding an expanded query packet in TXT format, a DNSCurve
client MUST create a DNS standard query packet with the AA, TC, RD,
RA, Z, and RCODE bits cleared, a single entry in the question
section, and no records in the answer, authority records, or
additional records sections. The one question MUST be an Internet
class question for TXT records for the query name constructed from
the concatenation of the following labels:
o One or more labels, each label before the last being exactly 50
bytes, the last label being at most 50 bytes. The concatenation
of these labels is the base-32 encoding of a 96-bit client-
selected nonce for this packet followed by a cryptographic box
containing the original DNS query packet.
o One 54-byte label: the client's DNSCurve public key, encoded as
described in Section 4, except with the magic string "x1a" instead
of "uz5".
o Zero or more additional labels specifying the name of the zone
served by this server; i.e., the owner name of the relevant NS
record.
A DNSCurve server SHOULD be lenient in decoding expanded query
packets in TXT format. In particular, it MUST allow the RD bit to
either be set or clear, MUST allow records in the answer, authority
records, and additional records sections, and MUST allow any labels
to follow the DNSCurve public key in the query name. However, it
MUST discard packets with the QR bit set.
When encoding an expanded response packet in TXT format, a DNSCurve
server MUST create a DNS standard response packet copying the ID, RD
bit, and questions section from the expanded query packet, setting
the AA bit, leaving the TC and RA bits cleared and Z and RCODE values
Dempsky Expires February 27, 2010 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft DNSCurve: Link-level security for DNS August 2009
set to 0, containing one record in the answer section, and no records
in the authority records or additional records section. The record
in the answer section MUST be an Internet-class TXT record for the
query name from the questions section with a TTL of 0. The RDATA of
this record is the 96-bit server-selected nonce extension followed by
a cryptographic box containing the original DNS response packet,
encoded as a sequence of one or more strings of at most 255 bytes in
standard DNS TXT RDATA format.
Similarly, a DNSCurve client SHOULD be lenient in decoding expanded
response packets in TXT format. In particular, it MUST allow the
server to alter the case of the query name when repeating it in the
questions section.
7. UDP and TCP
If a normal DNS response packet is larger than 512 bytes then the
server replaces it by an explicitly truncated packet. The client
then tries again through TCP. Servers are not required to support
TCP if no responses are above 512 bytes; clients are permitted to try
TCP only if the server has explicitly indicated truncation.
DNSCurve does not require TCP support from servers that were not
already supporting TCP. If the original DNS response packet is at
most 512 bytes then the server is permitted to send the expanded
response packet as a UDP packet. DNSCurve clients are required to
set aside a 4096-byte buffer for receiving a UDP response packet.
If the original DNS response packet is above 512 bytes then it is
replaced by an explicitly truncated packet and the truncated packet
is protected by DNSCurve. In this case the client tries again by
TCP, sending its DNSCurve query packet through TCP and receiving the
DNSCurve response through TCP.
TCP is considerably more expensive for clients and servers than UDP
is, and TCP has no protection against denial of service, so server
administrators are advised to stay below 512 bytes if possible.
DNSCurve adds some denial-of-service protection for UDP but cannot do
anything to help TCP.
If a protected DNS query includes an EDNS0 OPT record, then the
payload size field refers to how large the original DNS response
packet can be before encoding as a DNSCurve response packet. Clients
MUST reduce the payload size they advertise to account for overhead
from encoding the response as an expanded response packet. If a
server builds a response within the payload size limit, but cannot
fit the encoded response in 4096 bytes, then it MAY silently discard
Dempsky Expires February 27, 2010 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft DNSCurve: Link-level security for DNS August 2009
the response.
8. Security considerations
The security of the Curve25519XSalsa20Poly1305 cryptosystem and its
underlying cryptographic primitives is discussed in [naclcrypto]. In
summary, it is designed to meet the standard notions of privacy and
third-party unforgeability for a public-key authenticated-encryption
scheme using nonces.
DNSCurve only provides link-level security between a client-server
pair. It does not attempt to ensure end-to-end security for queries
and responses relayed by untrusted DNS proxies and caches.
9. IANA considerations
This document has no actions for IANA.
10. Normative references
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC4648] Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data
Encodings", RFC 4648, October 2006.
[naclcrypto]
Bernstein, D., "Cryptography in NaCl", March 2009.
Author's Address
Matthew Dempsky
OpenDNS, Inc.
199 Fremont St, Fl 12
San Francisco, CA 94105-6629
US
Phone: +1 415 680 3742
Email: matthew@dempsky.org
Dempsky Expires February 27, 2010 [Page 9]
Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.126, available from
https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/