[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02 03 04

INTERNET-DRAFT                                    Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
Expires May 2003                                           November 2002

          Mapping Between MIME Types, Content-Types, and URIs
          ------- ------- ---- ------ -------------- --- ----

                         Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Status of This Document

   Distribution of this document is unlimited. Comments should be sent
   to the author.

   This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026.  Internet-Drafts are
   working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its
   areas, and its working groups.  Note that other groups may also
   distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."  The list
   of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt The list of Internet-Draft
   Shadow Directories can be accessed at


   Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension (MIME) Content-Type headers, the
   MIME types used therein, and Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) are
   being used, in different contexts, to label entities.  A mapping is
   specified from each kind of label into the other.  This makes it
   possible to express the union of their meaning in either URI or
   Content-Type syntax.

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 1]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs

Table of Contents

      Status of This Document....................................1

      Table of Contents..........................................2

      1. Introduction............................................3
      1.1 Introduction to URIs and MIME Type/Content-Type........3
      1.2 Definitions and Conventions............................4
      1.3 Additional Features....................................5
      1.4 Overview of Remaining Sections.........................5
      2. Mapping of Content-Type to URI..........................5
      2.1 Simple Mapping of MIME Type to URI.....................6
      2.2 Mapping of Content-Type to URI.........................6
      2.3 Content-Type Mapping Special Case for Closure..........7
      2.4 Controlled Mapping of a Content-Type to a URI..........8
      3. Mapping of URI to Content-Type..........................8
      3.1 Simple Mapping of URI to Content-Type..................8
      3.2 URI Mapping Special Case for Basic Closure.............9
      3.3 Controlled Mapping of a URI to a Content-Type.........10
      4. Troublesome Characters.................................11
      5. IANA Considerations and Potential Conflicts............11
      6. Security Considerations................................12


      Informative References....................................17
      Normative References......................................17
      Author's Address..........................................18
      Expiration and File Name..................................18

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 2]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs

1. Introduction

   Both MIME types and URIs have come to be used for type labeling and
   similar information. Both new MIME types and XML applications using
   new URIs for type labeling are continuing to be created and there
   does not appear to be any prospect that either syntax will become so
   dominant that the other will wither.

   In most protocols where there are provisions for a general "type
   label", that label is restricted to the syntax of a URI or the syntax
   of a Content-Type.  In some cases, it will be useful to be able to
   express labels which already exist in the "other" syntax. That is, it
   may be useful in a URI syntax slot to also be able to express a MIME
   type or Content-Type and, conversely, it may be useful in a Content-
   Type syntax slot to also be able to express a URI.

   Ability to express Content-Types as URIs makes is easy to talk about
   them in [RDF] or other languages which refer to things with URIs.  If
   one is sending, via SMTP, HTTP, or any other protocol using Content-
   Types, keying material or other things typed by the URI format type
   labels specified in [RFC 3275] or [XMLENC] it is convenient to be
   able to express such URI type labels as a Content-Type header.  In
   the SMIL 2.0 case of the systemComponent attribute, there is a
   specific URI format attribute intended to contain Content-Type
   information [SMIL]. These are just a few specific examples that need
   a way to convert between URI and Content-Type syntaxes.

   This document specifies how to map any Content-Type into a URI and
   vice versa.

1.1 Introduction to URIs and MIME Type/Content-Type

   The IETF Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) message body
   standards have developed into a general tagging and bagging
   mechanism.  This mechanism has spread from SMTP mail to HTTP, USENET,
   and other protocols. In MIME, the type of an object is given in a
   "Content-Type" header line. [RFC 2045, 2046, 2048] Such a line
   consists of a MIME type and, optionally, additional parameters.  A
   MIME type consists of a MIME top level type, a slash, and a MIME

   The original Uniform Resource Locator (URL [RFC 1738]), used to point
   to World Wide Web (WWW) resources, has grown into the more general
   Uniform Resource Identifier (URI [RFC 2396]).  Increasingly URIs are
   used as general labels for algorithms [RFC 3275], XML namespaces [XML
   NAME], web based protocol data types, etc.  (In some of these label
   uses, URIs are considered opaque while in other cases they are
   assumed to be de-referencable into something which explicates their

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 3]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs


1.2 Definitions and Conventions

   Concerning URIs, please note the following:

       (1) In this document, the term URI is used to include URI
       Reference.  That is, it includes the case where an octothorp
       ("#") followed by a fragment identifier is suffixed to a pure

       (2) Only absolute URIs are mappable.  Relative URIs, with just a
       hierarchical part, are not included in URI as used in this
       document.  They must first be converted to absolute URIs as
       described in [RFC 2396].

       (3) For presentation purposes, URIs are shown inside angle
       brackets ("<...>") but these angle brackets are not actually a
       part of the URI.

   Concerning Content-Types, please note the following:

       Content-Type values are shown preceded by "Content-Type: " and,
       when long, they are line folded as per [RFC 2822].  This prefix
       and line folding are for presentation purposes and are not
       actually a part of the Content-Type.

   Concerning "URL encoding/decoding", please note the following:

       These are operations on character strings represented by octet
       sequences. "URL encoding" is the process of replacing certain
       octets with the three octets for the character percent sign ("%")
       followed by two hex digits for the value of the octet replaced.
       "URL decoding" is the inverse process, i.e. replacing all three
       octet sequences that start with the octet for percent sign and
       the remainder of which consist of two hex digits (0-9, A-F, or a-
       f) with a single octet whose value is represented by the two hex
       digit sequence.  The characters that are replaced by URL encoding
       for the purposes of this draft are listed in Section 4.

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119].

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 4]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs

1.3 Additional Features

   Note that a URI or Content-Type could get converted back and forth
   multiple times between these two syntaxes. To stop such multiple
   conversions from resulting in ever longer and more complex tags, a
   check is mandated so that if a conversion is of a previously
   converted syntax, the previous conversion is reversed, in so far as

   To improve the repeatability of the results from single or multiple
   steps of syntax conversion, capitalization and punctuation
   recommendations are made where tokens are case insensitive or
   variable punctuation is allowed.

   Finally, in cases where the default conversion does not provide for
   sufficient control, optional elements are defined for inclusion in
   URIs and Content-Types that provide substantial control over the
   mapping output.

1.4 Overview of Remaining Sections

   Sections 2 and 3 below give an explanation of the mapping specified,
   more or less in English.  The material is organized to start with the
   simplest and most common rules and then add exceptions for special
   cases and additional user control.

   Section 4 lists characters that must be URI ("%") encoded when
   mapping from a URI to a Content-Type.

   Section 5 covers IANA Considerations and potential conflicts.

   Section 6 give Security Considerations.

   The Appendix presents some sample code in Perl.

2. Mapping of Content-Type to URI

   This section starts with how to map a simple MIME type to a URI, in
   Section 2.1. In 2.2, this is expanded to mapping a full Content-Type
   with parameters. Section 2.3 adds the special check for the mapping
   of a Content-Type which appears to have originally come from a URI.
   And Section 2.4 describes how to control the mapping to a URI by
   means of a special Content-Type parameter.

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 5]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs

2.1 Simple Mapping of MIME Type to URI

   For the simplest case of a Content-Type consisting of just a MIME
   type, create a URI with scheme "ContentType" and a scheme dependent
   part consisting of the MIME type.  For example

       Content-Type: image/JPEG

   simply converts to


   White space is not allowed in URIs so it must be removed.  Scheme
   names (the part before the first ":" in a URI) are case insensitive
   but for readability and repeatability, the capitalization
   "ContentType" SHOULD be used.  Similarly, MIME top level types and
   subtypes (the fields before and after the "/" in a MIME type field,
   respectively) are case insensitive but SHOULD be all lower cased when
   mapped to the URI form. For example

       Content-type: x-FOO?bar/biZZare#sUb#tYpe

   converts to


   Note: There is no "//" after the "ContentType:" scheme as used
       herein.  Such a "//" would imply a specific structuring of the
       scheme dependent part appearing in the URI after the
       "ContentType:" as defined in [RFC 2396].  Since that full
       structuring is not used, "//" is not used.  The meaning of URIs
       starting with "ContentType://" is reserved for future definition.

   Note: "Content-Type", with hyphen, is syntactically allowed as a
       scheme name.  However, [RFC 2717] reserves embedded hyphens in
       scheme names to indicate the prefix of an alternate tree of
       scheme names. Therefore, the un-hyphenated ContentType is used.

2.2 Mapping of Content-Type to URI

   A Content-Type header frequently includes more than just the
   mandatory MIME type.  It can also have type dependent parameters,
   including private parameters, such as

       Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii";
           x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"

       Content-Type: image/tiff; application=faxbw

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 6]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs

   Content-Type parameters are mapped into a "query portion" suffix of
   the URI in much the same way that HTML form fields [HTML] are.  That
   is, they are concatenated to the MIME type after a "?" and, if there
   is more than one parameter, separated by "&". Thus the above Content-
   Types would be mapped into the following URIs:



   Parameter values in the mapped URI MUST always be enclosed in double
   quotes ('"').  If the Content-Type has a trailing ";" but no
   parameters, then "?" SHOULD NOT be added to the URI.

   Note: Any occurrences of the "&" separator will have to be encoded as
       "&amp;" or other appropriate character reference if the URI is
       used in XML outside a CDATA construct, or most other SGML derived
       languages. However, "&" is the standard separator used in CGI
       (Common Gateway Interface) parsing of query section parameters
       for "mailto:" [RFC 2368], "http:", etc., schemes. On balance, the
       continued use of "&" has been chosen.

2.3 Content-Type Mapping Special Case for Closure

   A URI may have been converted to a Content-Type and get converted
   back.  To stop this from resulting in an ever more complex syntax, a
   check MUST be made to see if the MIME subtype of a Content-Type being
   converted is in the "uri." subtype tree (see section 3.2 below).  If
   so, the URI is computed from the subtype by stripping the "uri."
   prefix and undoing one level of URI encoding.  The top level MIME
   type is ignored in this case.  In addition, Content-Type parameters,
   if any, are added as a "query portion" and any "URI-fragment"
   parameter is added as a fragment.

   For example:

       Content-Type: application/uri.mailto%3Auser%40host.example

       Content-Type: application/uri.http%3A%2F%2Fx.test; foo="123";


   are mapped to

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 7]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs




   Note: If a Content-Type or MIME Type is being written by a user and
       they know that there is a URI which is a more natural expression
       of the labeling desired, they can simply use an ".../uri."  MIME
       Type to start with.

2.4 Controlled Mapping of a Content-Type to a URI

   There will be cases where greater control over the mapping is
   desired. These are cases where a more natural URI exists rather than
   the automatic "ContentType" URI scheme.

   To accomplish this controlled mapping starting with a Content-Type, a
   special Content-Type parameter "URI-body" is defined.  If a Content-
   Type does not have a MIME subtype in the "uri." tree and this
   parameter is present, it is URL decoded to produce the non-query
   portion of the URI mapped to and the original MIME top level and sub
   types is preserved in a URI query parameter called "MIME-type".

   For example

       Content-Type: application/xml; URI-body="http://xml.example/foo"

   would map to


3. Mapping of URI to Content-Type

   Section 3.1 below describes the basic mapping of a URI into a
   Content-Type. Section 3.2 specifies the exceptional processing when a
   URI being converted to a Content-Type appears to have previously been
   converted from a Content-Type. And Section 3.3 provides for greater
   control over the mapping when needed.

3.1 Simple Mapping of URI to Content-Type

   In the basic case, a URI maps to a Content-Type with a top level MIME
   type of "application" and a MIME sub-type in the "uri." tree.  The

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 8]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs

   "uri." is followed by the URL encoding of the URI excluding the query
   and fragment parts.  Any "query" parameters in the URI are mapped to
   Content-Type parameters and, if the URI ends with a fragment
   identifier, it is mapped to the special Content-Type parameter "URI-

   Note: Current URI syntax permits scheme dependent parts in which "?"
       does not indicate a query section; however, no such syntaxes have
       been publicly defined.

   Some examples of the basic case follow:




   convert to

       Content-Type: application/uri.http%3A%2F%2Fexample.com%2Ftag42

       Content-Type: application/uri.mailto%3AU%40example.net;
           subject="misc"; body="line1%250D%250Aline2"

       Content-Type: application/uri.xyz%3A%2F%2Fabc.test%2Fdef;
           h="ijk"; URI-fragment="lmn"

   Content-Type parameters values extracted from the query portion of a
   URI MUST be surrounded with double quotes ('"').  When URI encoding,
   if the hex value contains any letters (a-f), they SHOULD be upper

3.2 URI Mapping Special Case for Basic Closure

   It is desirable that an arbitrary Content-Type be recovered
   semantically intact when mapped to a URI and then that URI is mapped
   back to a Content-Type.  To approximate this as closely as practical,
   the following special case is added to the simple case described in
   section 3.1 above.

   If the URI scheme is "ContentType:", then the Content-Type is
   computed from the remaining part of the URI (the scheme specific
   part), by replacing the first question mark ("?") and all subsequent
   ampersands ("&") with the two character sequence semi-colon space (";
   "), and then undoing one level of URI encoding, i.e., replacing
   percent sign ("%") followed by two hex digits with the octet having
   that hex value.

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                 [Page 9]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs

   For example



   are mapped to

       Content-Type: model/vnd.example.longish.sub#type.name

       Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; x-obscure="value"

   Note: A URI produced by simple mapping from a normal Content-Type
       will never have a fragment suffix. If one appears, it should be
       mapped into a URI-fragment parameter, as specified in Section 3.1

   Note: If a type label URI is being written by a user and they know
       that there is a Content-Type which is a more natural expression
       of the labeling desired, they can simply use a "ContentType:"
       scheme to start with.

3.3 Controlled Mapping of a URI to a Content-Type

   There will be cases where greater control over the mapping is
   desired.  These are cases where a more natural Content-Type exists
   than the "uri." subtree MIME subtype under the "application" type.

   To accomplish this controlled mapping starting with a URI, a special
   query part parameter "MIME-type" is defined. If a URI is not of
   scheme ContentType and this special parameter is found, then the MIME
   type is set to the parameter value after URL decoding and the URI
   body (all of the URI except "query" parameters and any fragment
   identifier) is preserved in a URL encoded "URI-body" Content-Type

   For example


   would map to

       Content-Type: message/rfc822;
           URI-body="mailto:joe@blow.text"; URI-fragment="123"

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                [Page 10]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs

4. Troublesome Characters

   Troublesome characters are defined as those not permitted in a token
   in [RFC 2045] with the addition of percent sign and octothorp.  That
   is, any character code from 0 through 32 inclusive and character code
   127 and any of "(", ")", "<", ">", "@", ",", ";", ":", "\", "/", "[",
   "]", "?", "%", "#", and "=" are troublesome characters.

5. IANA Considerations and Potential Conflicts

   This document allocates and specifies the following:

   (1) The "ContentType" URI scheme.

   (2) The "uri." MIME subtype tree.  Since this subtree is totally
       delegated to the URI specification, there are no independent
       publication or review requirements for it.  Any valid URI can be
       used after the "uri." in any MIME top level type, after
       troublesome characters (see section 4) in the URI are URL

   (3) In the context of URI to Content-Type mapping, a meaning is
       specified for the "MIME-type" URI query section parameter.

   (4) In the context of Content-Type to URI mapping, a meaning is
       specified for the "URI-body" and "URI-fragment" Content-Type

   Because this document specifies the "ContentType" URI scheme and the
   "uri." MIME subtype tree, no conflict can arise due to other uses of

   This is the first specification of a Content-Type parameters valid
   across all MIME types, namely URI-body and URI-fragment.  This is the
   first specification of a universal URI query parameter, namely MIME-
   type.  The probability that any different use is currently being
   made, or will in the foreseeable future have to be made, of these
   names is low enough that it can be ignored.

   It is possible that some processing systems are sensitive to the
   presence of parameters they do not understand and will indicate
   errors when presented with controlled mapping URIs or Content-Types.
   However, Content-Type parameters and URI query parameters are usually
   handled on receipt by such mechanisms as storing the name-value pair
   in an associative array or as "environment variables" and ignoring
   extra parameters.  In fact, Content-Type processors are required by
   [RFC 2046] to ignore any parameters they do not understand and to
   ignore parameter order.

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                [Page 11]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs

6. Security Considerations

   In some sense, the security considerations for MIME and content types
   [RFC 2046], URIs [RFC 2396], and for every individual MIME type and
   URI scheme can apply.

   In addition, the deployment of mapping aware software may enable the
   introduction into or transmission through MIME or Content-Type
   contexts of URI semantics, including possibly dangerous action
   schemes such as "mailto", and the introduction into or transmission
   through URI contexts of MIME and content type semantics, including
   possibly dangerous executable data types or the like.

   Finally, implementation of controlled mapping may enable a malicious
   user, by adding one of the special parameters specified herein, to
   cause a surprising change in the semantics of a URI or Content-Type
   produced by the mapping from an apparently innocuous Content-Type or
   URI. Particular care should be given to screening the characters
   resulting from URL decoding into character code sensitive fields.

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                [Page 12]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs


   The following Perl code implements much of the mapping given in
   Sections 2 and 3 above:

# Content-Type and URI intermapping example code
# Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, November 2001

# -----------
# test driver
# -----------
use strict;
print "Type a Content-Type, a URI, or 'Quit'. Do NOT include\n";
 "angle brackets around the URI or a 'Content-Type:' prefix.\n\n";
while ( <STDIN> )    # get test input
my $test;
chomp ( $_ );
if ( /^\s*([-\w\.+]+:[^\s]*)/ )     #test for URI
    print "<$1>\n";                 # echo
    $test = uri2ct ( $1 );
    print " Content-Type: ", $test, "\n";
    $test = ct2uri ( $test );
    print "<$test>\n";             # converted back
elsif                              #test for Content-Type
 ( m=^\s*([-_\w\.+#\$%!\?]+/[-_\w\.+#\$%!\?]+.*)= )
# (note: RFC 2405 allows other characters in type and subtype)
    print "Content-Type: $1\n";    # echo
    $test = ct2uri ( $1 );
    print " <", $test, ">\n";
    $test = uri2ct ( $test );
    print "Content-Type: $test\n"; # converted back
elsif ( /^\s*$/ )
elsif ( /exit|quit|halt|stop|end/i  )
    { last; }
else { print "BAD INPUT: $_\n"; }
print "\n";
print "EXIT\n";
sleep 1;

# ---------------------------
# convert URI to Content-Type
# ---------------------------

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                [Page 13]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs

sub uri2ct ($) {
my $result; my $item;
my %paramh; my @paraml;
@_[0] =~ m=\s*([^:/?#]+)?:([^?#]*)(\?([^#]*))?(#([^\s]*))?=;
#             1           2       3  4        5 6
my $scheme = lc ( $1 );
my $main = $2;
@paraml = split ( /&/, $4 );
foreach $item (@paraml)
    $item =~ /([^=]+)=(.*)/;
    $paramh{ lc ( $1 ) } = $2;
if ( $scheme eq "contenttype" )
    { $result = yestrouble ( $main ); }
elsif ( $result = $paramh{"mime-type"} )
    delete ( $paramh{"mime-type"} );
    $result =~ s/^"(.*)"$/$1/;
    $result = yestrouble ( $result ) . '; URI-body="' .
              notrouble ( $scheme . ":" . $main ) . '"';
    $result = "application/uri." .
              notrouble ( $scheme . ":" . $main );
if ( %paramh )
    my $key; my $value;
    while (( $key, $value ) = each ( %paramh ))
        { $result .= "; $key=" . dquote ( $value ); }
if ( $5 )
    { $result .= '; URI-fragment="' . notrouble ( $6 ) . '"'; }
return $result;
}    # end uri2ct

# ---------------------------
# convert Content-Type to URI
# ---------------------------
sub ct2uri ($) {
my %paramh; my @paraml;
my $result; my $item; my $fragment;
@_[0] =~
#     1                   2                     3    4
my $type = lc ( notrouble ( $1 ) . "/" . notrouble ( $2 ) );
my $minor = lc ( $2 );
@paraml = split ( /\s*;\s*/, $4 );

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                [Page 14]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs

foreach $item ( @paraml )
    $item =~ /([^=\s]+)\s*=\s*(.*)/;
    $paramh{ lc ( $1 ) } = $2;
if ( $minor =~ /^uri\.(.*)/i )
    { $result = yestrouble ( $1 ); }
elsif ( $result = $paramh{"uri-body"} )
    delete ( $paramh{"uri-body"} );
    $result = yestrouble ( $result );
    $result =~ s/^"(.*)"$/$1/ ;
    $paramh{"MIME-type"} = $type;
    $result = "ContentType:" . $type;
if ( $fragment = $paramh{"uri-fragment"} )
    delete ( $paramh{"uri-fragment"} );
    $fragment =~ s/^"(.*)"$/$1/;
if ( %paramh )
    my $key; my $value;
    $result .= "?";
    while (( $key, $value ) = each ( %paramh ))
        $result .= $key . '=' . dquote ( $value ) . "&";
    chop ( $result );    # get rid of trailing &
if ( $fragment )
    { $result .= '#' . yestrouble ( $fragment ) }
return $result;
}    # end ct2uri

# -------------------
# support subroutines
# -------------------

# double quote string if not already double quoted
# ------------------------------------------------
sub dquote ($) {
my $string = @_[0];
if ( $string =~ /^".*"$/ )
    { return $string; }
return '"' . $string . '"';

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                [Page 15]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs

# URL encode troublesome characters
# ---------------------------------
sub notrouble ($) {
my $string = @_[0];
my $result;
while ( $string =~
# 1                            2                          3
    $result .= "$1%" . sprintf ( "%02X", ord ( $2 ) );
    $string = $3;
return $result . $string;
}    # end no trouble

# decode URL encoded string
# -------------------------
sub yestrouble ($) {
my $string = @_[0];
my $result;
while ( $string =~ /([^%]*)%([0-9a-fA-F]{2})(.*)/ )
    $result .= $1 .
        chr ( unhexify ( substr ( $2, 0, 1 ) ) * 16
            + unhexify ( substr ( $2, 1, 1 ) ) );
    $string = $3;
return $result . $string;
}    # end yestrouble

# convert hex digit to corresponding integer
# ------------------------------------------
sub unhexify ($) {
my $num = ord (@_[0]);
if ( $num >= ord ("0") && $num <= ord ("9") )
    { return ( $num - ord ("0" ) ); }
if ( $num >= ord ("A") && $num <= ord ("F") )
    { return ( $num - ord ("A" ) + 10 ); }
return ( $num - ord ("a" ) + 10 );

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                [Page 16]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs

Informative References

   [HTML] - Dave Raggett, Arnaud Le Hors, Ian Jacobs, "HTML 4.01
   Specification", <http://www.w3.org/TR/html4>, December 1999.

   [RDF] - O. Lassila, R. Swick, "Resource Description Framework (RDF)
   Model and Syntax Specification", <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-
   syntax>, 22 February 1999.

   [RFC 1738] - T. Berners-Lee, L. Masinter, M.McCahill, "Uniform
   Resource Locators (URL)", December 1994.

   [RFC 2368] - P. Hoffman, L. Masinter, J. Zawinski, "The mailto URL
   scheme", July 1998

   [RFC 2822] - P. Resnick, Editor, "Internet Message Format", April

   [RFC 3275] - D. Eastlake, J. Reagle, D.  Solo, "XML-Signature Syntax
   and Processing", March 2002.

   [SMIL] - "Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 2.0)",
   <http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-smil20-20010807/>, 7 August 2001.

   [XML NAME] - Tim Bray, Dave Hollander, Andrew Layman, "Namespaces in
   XML", <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names>, 14 January 1999.

   [XMLENC] - D. Eastlake, J. Reagle, "XML Encryption Syntax and
   Processing", <http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xmlenc-core-20011018/>, 18
   October 2001.

Normative References

   [RFC 2045] - N. Freed & N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
   Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies",
   November 1996.

   [RFC 2046] - N. Freed & N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
   Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types", November 1996.

   [RFC 2048] - N. Freed, J. Klensin & J. Postel, "Multipurpose Internet
   Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Four: Registration Procedures", November

   [RFC 2119] - S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
   Requirement Levels", March 1997.

   [RFC 2396] - T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, L. Masinter, "Uniform

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                [Page 17]

INTERNET-DRAFT                      Mapping Between Content-Types & URIs

   Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", August 1998.

   [RFC 2717] - R. Petke, I. King, "Registration Procedures for URL
   Scheme Names", November 1999.

   [RFC 2718] - L. Masinter, H. Alvestrand, D.  Zigmond, R. Petke,
   "Guidelines for new URL Schemes", November 1999.

Author's Address

   Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
   155 Beaver Street
   Milford, MA 01757 USA

   Telephone:   +1 508-851-8280 (w)
                +1 508-634-2066 (h)
   EMail:       Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com

Expiration and File Name

   This draft expires May 2003.

   Its file name is draft-eastlake-cturi-04.txt.

D. Eastlake 3rd                                                [Page 18]

Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129c, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/