[Docs] [txt|pdf|xml|html] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02

VNF BOF                                                         S. Hares
Internet-Draft                                   Hickory Hill Consulting
Intended status: Informational                         February 14, 2014
Expires: August 18, 2014


   Use Cases for Resource Pools with Virtual Network Functions (VNFs)
                    draft-hares-vnf-pool-use-case-01

Abstract

   In the context of virtualization, a service essentially consists of a
   set of Virtualized Network Functions (VNFs) with each VNF building on
   top of virtualization infrastructure to implement a specific network
   functions along with the data connections between VNFs.  VNFs may be
   highly distributed existing in devices in data center networks,
   mobile networks or satellite networks.  In some of these
   environments, the resources are highly constrained.

   This draft provides seven use cases the author has observed in
   demonstrations or deployments for the following network function
   virtualization: cloud bursting, parental controls, load balancer for
   multipath (L1-L7), WAN optimization that runs either between access
   nodes and Data Centers, WAN optimization between mobile phones and
   Data Centers (through access nodes), application placement
   optimization, and optimized placement of web applications utilizing
   minimal data transfer.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 18, 2014.







Hares                    Expires August 18, 2014                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft              vnf-pool-use-case              February 2014


Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     1.2.  Use Case List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     1.3.  VNF Problems  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   2.  Cloud Bursting Use Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   3.  Stateful Parental Controls  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   4.  Load balancer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   5.  Android phone TCP WAN optimization  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   6.  SOHO device optimization  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
   7.  application scaling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   8.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   9.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   10. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     10.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     10.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11

1.  Introduction

   Certain network services within access networks, data center
   networks, and WAN networks are being virtualized.  The service
   virtualization has been considered as part of the network function
   virtualization (NFV) or the Software Defined Networking (SDN)
   technology development.  This draft focuses on the implementation of
   these network services using units of virtual network function (VNF)
   denoted as a VNF set where the each VNF is implemented as a pool of
   VNF instances.  Each VNF builds its VNF instances on top of
   virtualized infrastructure to implement a specific network function
   (NF)connected to other network functions (NFs).





Hares                    Expires August 18, 2014                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft              vnf-pool-use-case              February 2014


   For example, a VNF Firewall will have a pool of virtual firewall
   instances.  When VNF instances are highly distributed, such as in a
   DC network or some access edge nodes for IP RAN - virtual function
   instances are built on a resource constraint environment where
   resource contention, hardware status change, hardware or software
   failures may occur.

   This introduction introduces the terms, lists deployed VNF use cases
   documented in this draft, and summarizes the problems that Virtual
   Network Function Pools have.

1.1.  Terms

   The VNF Problem statement [I-D.zong-vnfpool-problem-statement]
   defines the terms reliability, VNF, VNF Pool, VNF Pool Element, VNF
   Pool User, VNF Pool Manager, and VNF Set.  This draft uses these
   definitions.  The following definitions are not defined within the
   VNF problem statement: Cloud Bursting, stateful parental controls,
   WAN optimization, and application placement.  These terms are defined
   below.

   Cloud Bursting: the ability for Virtual processing to burst through
   the limits of one virtual environment and automatically transfers a
   portion of the processing to another virtual environment.

   Stateful parental controls: the ability for network access devices to
   have content filters that react to traffic, location, and user.
   These controls follow the user across multiple access points within a
   home network, or in a carrier network.

   WAN optimization: the ability to optimize traffic across a Wide-Area
   network.  WAN optimization often makes use of TCP FLOW optimizations
   (with IETF TCP features) and TCP de-duplication of packets,

   Application placement: ability for coordinating software to place
   applications based a combination of compute resources, data storage,
   network service, and security concerns.  Application placement may
   involve movement of some application data, movement of some
   applications (data and compute), and movement of network resources to
   service the applications.  One type of network resource movement is
   the movement of virtual network functions (VNFs) which are defined,
   created, allocated with resources in a way to provide an integral
   unit to the application placement control software.

   OTT (Over the Top): This industry terms implies an overlay network
   that is overlaid on existing networks as a virtual network.





Hares                    Expires August 18, 2014                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft              vnf-pool-use-case              February 2014


1.2.  Use Case List

   The use cases described in this draft are:

   o  Cloud Bursting

   o  stateful parental controls implemented in access nodes and
      firewalls (stateful and regular)

   o  load balancer doing multipath (supports L1-L7 optimization),

   o  WAN optimization between access nodes and Data Centers,

   o  WAN optimization between mobile phones through access nodes to/
      from Data center (E.g Riverbed WAN),

   o  Application placement optimization using optimized DNS and DCHP
      VNFs,

   o  Application placement optimization to minimize data transfer.

   Deployment of multi-vendor interoperability VNF services requires
   protocols and interfaces to VNF Pools that VNF Managers can access.
   Enterprises and Carriers have indicated their desire to allow the
   multi-vendor promise of SDN to be realized in the VNF functions.

1.3.  VNF Problems

   VNF in constrained environments encounters the following types of
   problems: shared risk during VNF failures, VNF instance transition,
   backup and state synchronization of VNF within VNF sets, appropriate
   placement of VNF, reliable transport, and and multi-tenancy issues.

   (Note: The VNF Problem statement [I-D.zong-vnfpool-problem-statement]
   has not included multi-tenancy issues.

   Shared risk group

   Shared risk groups occur when different VNF instances are built on
   top of the same instance of a virtualized platform (E.g. hypervisor).
   When a hypervisor fails, all the VNF instances on the same hypervisor
   will fail, and service chains with this hypervisor VNFs in the remote
   chain will fail.  Several concurrent services will fail when a
   hypervisor fails.  If a fail and a restart occur quickly, it may
   placed substantial load on the network as effective VFN chains cause
   other nodes to be impacted.





Hares                    Expires August 18, 2014                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft              vnf-pool-use-case              February 2014


   A VNF instance may encounter varying conditions on available
   resources during hypervisor load, resource contention from other
   VNFs, VMs or application programs running.  The resources may be
   unavailable due contention with other programs placing load on the
   hypervisor, or hardware failures, software failure, or DOS.

   VNF instance transition

   If the VNF is unable to get the appropriate resources, the VNF meta-
   controller/manager may decide to migrate the function to another
   hypervisor or another portion of the network.  Appropriate resources
   may include CPU resources, storage resources, special hardware
   resources, memory, and network resources.  Another reason for varying
   conditions of resources is the need to add additional VNF to provide
   the appropriate level processing.  For example, if additional in-
   depth analysis of a data pattern in a traffic flow was determine
   further security actions, another VNF set with DPI inspection and
   analysis might be created.

   Backup and state synchronization

   Backup systems are needed for any system requiring high reliability
   or high availability.  Virtualized network services desired by
   customers may include network services critical to security of a
   network, user service levels, or insuring continued network
   availability during network outages.  Planned network outages require
   transition of virtualized network services to other portions of the
   network.  Transitions during planned outages have two cycles:
   transition before outage, transition after outage.

   Other than VNF transition, VNF instances will fail due to either
   hardware or software failure in various levels such as hypervisor, VM
   or even program.  During a software failure, the VNF functions or
   group of functions may expand to synchronize state, handoff
   processes, and announce backup.  This state synchronization may be
   limited to one hypervisor or spread across several hypervisors.

   Multi-tenancy

   When different users cohabitate the same VNFs or different VNFs
   cohabitate the same hypervisors, cohabitation may cause conflicts.
   Just as different human roommates sharing a common kitchen
   facilities, may have different traffic patterns so do different users
   utilizing the common VNFs.  To stretch the metaphor, suppose one
   roommate wants to clean cooking pot immediately after use while the
   second roommate wants to wash cooking pots at the end of his/her
   cooking preparation.  At some point, the roommates might contend for
   the sink to wash dishes.  In the same way, data flows wanting to



Hares                    Expires August 18, 2014                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft              vnf-pool-use-case              February 2014


   share a Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) engine may find that
   cohabitation in the multi-tenant DPI may cause issues.  Different
   levels of reliability will also impact how multiple tenants share
   their resources.  Resource pools allow both VNFs to get the common
   resource when desired by virtualizing it.

2.  Cloud Bursting Use Case

   Description:

   Three cases of cloud bursting exist.  Public clouds adding more
   resources upon demand.  Private clouds adding more resources upon
   demand from private cloud resources.  Private clouds adding more
   resources from the public cloud.  In the public/private cloud, the
   orchestration system looks within pools of additional resources to
   fit the request for more resources for a particular time.  Verizon
   provided examples of cloud bursing at ONS 2012, and Terremark
   utilizes cloud bursing to obtain more resources (http://
   www.terremark.com/services/it-infrastructure/cloud-services/
   enterprise-cloud/architecture/) operating over open-source
   hypervisors (2012, 2013).

   Resource pools with VMs that do a specific function (VNF or
   processing) within the operate to configure virtual switches,
   routers, and transport process (TCP/STCP) via standard interfaces
   (libvirt, CLI, REST, and JASON).  The following is a list of
   functions may use that cloud bursting operators have been known to
   use pools for;

   o  Virtual Machines (VMs) for application processing

   o  VMs for remote storage drops

   o  VMs for virtual firewall

   o  VMS for DPI or DDOS

   o  VMs specialized DNS that controls private/public cloud move

   o  VMs for movement of data and applications within Cloud (Private/
      Public) or between clouds

   o  VMs for VPN to user

   Why VNF Pools: Bursty nature of action of Cloud Bursting requires
   being able to pre-allocate pools of VNF instances prior to use.
   Multi-vendor interoperable VNF Pools allows Data Center operators in




Hares                    Expires August 18, 2014                [Page 6]


Internet-Draft              vnf-pool-use-case              February 2014


   Enterprise and Carriers to avoid the single-source for purchasing and
   single-code source software-bug failures.

3.  Stateful Parental Controls

   Description:

   Parental content filters are targeted filters that are installed
   based on an identification of a user.  When the centralized
   controller detects the User (via traffic pattern, role identification
   (ABFAB, HTTP)), SDN installs the appropriate software to guarantee
   filters.  Two types of security exist: authentication and
   authorization.  In authentication, ACL and other port based filtering
   is set per customer for the user.  This filtering may block,
   prioritize, or transfer to a blackhole recording device different
   traffic.  In authorization, the systems create a web of trust via an
   identity server (for HTTP 1.0 SAML template defined by OASIS and IETF
   ABFAB information for non-http).

   The following is a list of some of the VNFs associated who might use
   pool facilities:

   o  VNF(s) for open source DPIs (snort, etc)

   o  VNFs for specialized DPI inspection

   o  VNFs for probes on hypervisors"

   o  VNFs for depositing configuration in SDN OFS switches, and non-SDN
      switches, routers, firewalls, access nodes

   o  VNF(s) for firewall

   o  VNFs for DDOS

   o  VNFs for specialized DNS/DHCP services after private/public cloud
      move

   o  VNFs for movement within Cloud (Private/Public) or between clouds

   o  VNF(s) for VPN to user identification

   Why VNF Pools: Bursty nature of user access that is data dependent
   requires being able to pre-allocate pools of services prior to use.
   Multi-vendor interoperable VNF Pools Enterprise and Carriers to avoid
   the single-source access devices for purchasing and single-code
   source software-bug failures in access nodes.




Hares                    Expires August 18, 2014                [Page 7]


Internet-Draft              vnf-pool-use-case              February 2014


4.  Load balancer

   Description:

   Load balancers (such as Riverbed or Cisco) look to balance traffic
   different layers of the stack (L1-L7).  SDN meta controllers
   (OpenDaylight, Vyatta) monitor work with the time-critical OTT
   control process (which creates and manages the OTT VPNs (L2/L3/MPLS))
   to determine where the load is at any specific time, and to track it
   over time.  The SDN orchestrators work with the SDN OTT control
   process to adjust to readjust the load at L1-L7.

   The VNF functions that use resource pools in the load balancing
   service are:

   o  VNFs for probes in all devices (mobile phone, ipad, access
      devices, vswitch, vrouter, tcp optimizer, DPI, hypervisors, VMs
      dumming storage, VMs creating the network;

   o  VNFs for depositing configuration in SDN OFS switches, and non-SDN
      switches, routers, firewalls, access nodes;

   o  VNFs for firewall;

   o  VNFs for Traffic capacity/load balance calculation;

   o  VNFs running orchestrator monitor/change algorithms;

   o  VNFs for traffic movement within Cloud (Private/Public) or between
      clouds to balance load; and

   o  VNFs for VPN to user identification.

   Why VNF Pools: True end-to-end Load balancing requires a load
   balancing across multiple layers.  with VNF pools to support
   different functions.  Multi-vendors solutions will allow meta
   controllers to balance traffic to reduce costs in networks.  Current
   Enterprise customers find the load balancing operates with TCP WAN
   optimization to utilize all network bandwidth effectively.

5.  Android phone TCP WAN optimization

   Description:

   Android phones and Android tablets often communicate across the LTE/
   WiFi connections.  Optimization of the link for the low-bandwidth of
   LTE or Wifi connections, and the switch between LTE and WiFi requires




Hares                    Expires August 18, 2014                [Page 8]


Internet-Draft              vnf-pool-use-case              February 2014


   monitoring of traffic, choosing link, optimizing TCP (Window and
   removing duplicates).

   The VNFs that use resource pools in this application include:

   o  VNFs for probes in all devices (mobile phone, mobile pads, Wifi
      enabled nodes, LTE IP RAN notes)

   o  VNFs for depositing configuration in SDN access nodes (Wifi or
      LTE)

   o  VNFs for to handle remote phone parameter adjustments;

   o  VNFs to do firewalls (E.g traffic not allowed over LTE due to
      customer policy);

   o  VNFs for TCP data de-duplication process;

   o  VNFs for Traffic capacity/load balance calculation (see Football
      stadium problem below);

   o  VNFs for best processing of Video traffic or best network to pull
      Video traffic from;

   o  VNFs for VMs for VPN to user identification; and

   o  VNFs to interface to secure data processes.

   One scenario to consider is the football stadium scenario.  A person
   takes the IPAD to watch the close up replays or send email.  During
   fourth quarter, the person receive an urgent call to go home and
   walks with the IPAD down the street to the metro-system to return
   home.  On the way, the person is utilizing the IPAD to send mail,
   watch the football game, and do Skype calls.

   Why VNF Pools: Phones systems do not want a single vendor for all
   features.  Multiple interoperable access nodes and Android pad/tablet
   implementations require these VNF pools.

6.  SOHO device optimization

   Description:

   SOHO devices using SDN VM technology must balance traffic movement
   between small cells (WiFi or femtocells).  Access policies must be
   configured for restriction on this policy.

   The VNFs that use resource pools in this application are:



Hares                    Expires August 18, 2014                [Page 9]


Internet-Draft              vnf-pool-use-case              February 2014


   o  VNFs for probes in all devices (mobile phone, mobile pads, WiFi
      enabled nodes, LTE or femtocells)

   o  VNFs for depositing configuration in SDN access nodes (Wifi, L),
      VNFs for handling remote phone parameter adjustments;

   o  vNFs for firewall (traffic not allowed over LTE);

   o  VNFs for TCP data de-duplication process;

   o  VNFs for Traffic capacity/load balancing over single/multiple soho
      links;

   o  VNFs to allow applications load balance across internal soho links
      based on traffic needs and use policy; and

   o  VNFs for VPN to user identification and security.

   Why VNF Pools: SOHO devices often need to be plug and play for
   different types of users.  Common VNF Pools allows development of
   interoperable devices that can plug and play under a SOHO controller.

7.  application scaling

   Description:

   Applications may be placed in a variety of hypervisors.  The rapid
   deployment of applications on services may allow millions of
   applications to be available within the cloud.  Creating a effective
   lookup for the applications or redirecting applications takes an
   Network Virtual environment that controls DCHP, DNS, and http access
   rapidly. 2 Million URI references for each access node is possible
   given the current growth.

   VNF within the cloud must scale up to handle the VNF services
   required by the network infrastructure.  This includes the network
   information functions of DNS, DCHP, URL processing, AAA (Diameter/
   Radius).  Fast enactment of these network functions allows an on-
   demand creation of a multi-tennancy overlay (IETF NV03).

   The VNFs that use resource pools in this application are:

   o  VNFs for AAA functions (Diameter, Radius);

   o  VNFs for DNS functions;

   o  VNFs for DCHP functions




Hares                    Expires August 18, 2014               [Page 10]


Internet-Draft              vnf-pool-use-case              February 2014


   o  VNFs for specialized URL/URI processing;

   o  VNFs for handling remote probes on these virtual information
      functions;

   o  VNFs for handling remote configuration of these virtual
      information functions;

   o  VNFs for Traffic capacity/load balance calculation;

   o  VNFs for determine optimum deployment of full VMs for application
      or determination if data transfer to an existing application (Java
      Application data);

   o  VNFs for VPN to user identification and permissions to use data;
      and

   o  VNFs to determine back-up placements for applications

8.  IANA Considerations

   This document includes no request to IANA.

9.  Security Considerations

   This document has no security issues as just contains use cases.

10.  References

10.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

10.2.  Informative References

   [I-D.zong-vnfpool-problem-statement]
              Zong, N., Dunbar, L., Shore, M., and D. Lopez,
              "Virtualized Network Function (VNF) Pool Problem
              Statement", draft-zong-vnfpool-problem-statement-02 (work
              in progress), January 2014.

Author's Address








Hares                    Expires August 18, 2014               [Page 11]


Internet-Draft              vnf-pool-use-case              February 2014


   Susan Hares
   Hickory Hill Consulting
   7453 Hickory Hill
   Saline, CA  48176
   USA

   Email: shares@ndzh.com












































Hares                    Expires August 18, 2014               [Page 12]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129b, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/