[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: (RFC 2447) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 RFC 6047

Document: draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2447bis-02.txt              A. Melnikov
Intended category: Standard Track                                Editor
Expires: December 2006                                        June 2006


           iCalendar Message-Based Interoperability Protocol
                                 (iMIP)

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress".

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   A revised version of this draft document will be submitted to the RFC
   editor as a Draft Standard for the Internet Community.  Discussion
   and suggestions for improvement are requested, and should be sent to
   the CALSIFY Mailing list <ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org>.
   Distribution of this document is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

Abstract

   This document, iCalendar Message-Based Interoperability Protocol
   (iMIP), specifies a binding from the iCalendar Transport-independent
   Interoperability Protocol (iTIP) to Internet email-based transports.
   Calendaring entries defined by the iCalendar Object Model (iCAL) are
   composed using constructs from RFC 2822, RFC 2045, RFC 2046,



Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track            FORMFEED[Page 1]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


   RFC 2047, RFC 2048 and RFC 2049.

   This document is a product of Calendaring and Scheduling Standards
   Simplification (calsify) working group. More information about the
   IETF CALSIFY working group activities can be found on the IETF web
   site at <http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/calsify-charter.html>.













































Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track            FORMFEED[Page 2]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


Table of Contents

 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................2
  1.1 RELATED MEMOS ...................................................2
  1.2 FORMATTING CONVENTIONS ..........................................3
  1.3 TERMINOLOGY .....................................................4
 2 MIME MESSAGE FORMAT BINDING.........................................4
  2.1 MIME MEDIA TYPE .................................................4
  2.2 SECURITY ........................................................4
    2.2.1 Authorization ...............................................4
    2.2.2 Authentication ..............................................5
    2.2.3 Confidentiality .............................................5
  2.3 [RFC-2822] ADDRESSES ............................................5
  2.4 CONTENT TYPE ....................................................5
  2.5 CONTENT-TRANSFER-ENCODING .......................................6
  2.6 CONTENT-DISPOSITION .............................................6
 3 SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS.............................................7
 4 EXAMPLES............................................................8
  4.1 SINGLE COMPONENT WITH AN ATTACH PROPERTY ........................8
  4.2 USING MULTIPART ALTERNATIVE FOR LOW FIDELITY CLIENTS ............8
  4.3 SINGLE COMPONENT WITH AN ATTACH PROPERTY AND INLINE ATTACHMENT ..9
  4.4 MULTIPLE SIMILAR COMPONENTS ....................................10
  4.5 MULTIPLE MIXED COMPONENTS ......................................11
  4.6 DETAILED COMPONENTS WITH AN ATTACH PROPERTY ....................13
 5 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES..............................................14
  5.1 USE OF CONTENT AND MESSAGE IDS .................................14
 6 REFERENCES.........................................................15
 7 EDITOR'S ADDRESSES.................................................16
 8 FULL COPYRIGHT STATEMENT...........................................XX
 9 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY..............................................XX
1 Introduction

   This binding document provides the transport specific information
   necessary to convey iCalendar Transport-independent Interoperability
   Protocol (iTIP) over MIME as defined in [RFC-2822] and [RFC-2045].

1.1 Related Memos

   Implementers will need to be familiar with several other memos that,
   along with this memo, form a framework for Internet calendaring and
   scheduling standards.

   This document, [iMIP], specifies an Internet email binding for iTIP.

   [iCAL] - specifies a core specification of objects, data types,
   properties and property parameters;





Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track            FORMFEED[Page 3]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


   [iTIP] - specifies an interoperability protocol for scheduling
   between different implementations;

   This memo does not attempt to repeat the specification of concepts or
   definitions from these other memos. Where possible, references are
   made to the memo that provides for the specification of these
   concepts or definitions.

1.2 Formatting Conventions

   The mechanisms defined in this memo are defined in prose. In order to
   refer to elements of the calendaring and scheduling model, core
   object or interoperability protocol defined in [iCAL] and [iTIP] some
   formatting conventions have been used.

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC-2119].

   Calendaring and scheduling roles are referred to in quoted-strings of
   text with the first character of each word in upper case. For
   example, "Organizer" refers to a role of a "Calendar User" within the
   scheduling protocol defined by [iTIP].

   Calendar components defined by [iCAL] are referred to with
   capitalized, quoted-strings of text. All calendar components start
   with the letter "V". For example, "VEVENT" refers to the event
   calendar component, "VTODO" refers to the to-do calendar component
   and "VJOURNAL" refers to the daily journal calendar component.

   Scheduling methods defined by [iTIP] are referred to with
   capitalized, quoted-strings of text. For example, "REQUEST" refers to
   the method for requesting a scheduling calendar component be created
   or modified, "REPLY" refers to the method a recipient of a request
   uses to update their status with the "Organizer" of the calendar
   component.

   Properties defined by [iCAL] are referred to with capitalized,
   quoted-strings of text, followed by the word "property". For example,
   "ATTENDEE" property refers to the iCalendar property used to convey
   the calendar address of a calendar user.

   Property parameters defined by [iCAL] are referred to with lower
   case, quoted-strings of text, followed by the word "parameter". For
   example, "value" parameter refers to the iCalendar property parameter
   used to override the default data type for a property value.





Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track            FORMFEED[Page 4]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


1.3 Terminology

   The email terms used in this memo are defined in [RFC-2822] and
   [RFC-2045]. The calendaring and scheduling terms used in this memo
   are defined in [iCAL] and [iTIP].

2 MIME Message Format Binding

   This section defines the message binding to the MIME electronic mail
   transport.

   The sections below refer to the "originator" and the "respondent" of
   an iMIP message. Typically, the originator is the "Organizer" of an
   event.  The respondent is an "Attendee" of the event.

   The [RFC-2822] "Reply-To" header typically contains the email address
   of the originator or respondent of an event. However, this cannot be
   guaranteed as Mail User Agents (MUA) are not required to enforce iMIP
   semantics.

2.1 MIME Media Type

   A MIME entity containing content information formatted according to
   this document will be referenced as a "text/calendar" content type.
   It is assumed that this content type will be transported through a
   MIME electronic mail transport.

2.2 Security

   This section addresses several aspects of security including
   Authentication, Authorization and Confidentiality. Authentication and
   confidentiality can be achieved using [RFC-1847] that specifies the
   Security Multiparts for MIME. This framework defines new content
   types and subtypes of multipart: signed and encrypted. Each contains
   two body parts: one for the protected data and another for the
   control information necessary to remove the protection.

2.2.1 Authorization

   In [iTIP] messages, only the "Organizer" is authorized to modify or
   cancel calendar entries they organize. That is, spoof@xyz.example.net
   is not allowed to modify or cancel a meeting that was organized by
   a@example.com. Furthermore, only the respondent has the authorization
   to indicate their status to the "Organizer". That is, the "Organizer"
   must ignore an [iTIP] message from spoof@xyz.example.net that
   declines a meeting invitation for b@example.com.





Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track            FORMFEED[Page 5]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


   Implementations of iMIP SHOULD verify the authenticity of the creator
   of an iCalendar object before taking any action. The methods for
   doing this are presented later in this document.

   [RFC-1847] Message flow in iTIP supports someone working on behalf of
   a "Calendar User" through use of the "sent-by" parameter that is
   associated with the "ATTENDEE" and "ORGANIZER" properties. However,
   there is no mechanism to verify whether or not a "Calendar User" has
   authorized someone to work on their behalf. It is left to
   implementations to provide mechanisms for the "Calendar Users" to
   make that decision.

2.2.2 Authentication

   Authentication can be performed using an implementation of [RFC-1847]
   "multipart/signed" that supports public/private key certificates.
   Authentication is possible only on messages that have been signed.
   Authenticating an unsigned message may not be reliable.

2.2.3 Confidentiality

   To ensure confidentiality using iMIP implementations should utilize
   encryption compliant with [RFC-1847]. The protocol does not restrict
   a "Calendar User Agent" (CUA) from forwarding iCalendar objects to
   other users or agents.

2.3 [RFC-2822] Addresses

   The calendar address specified within the "ATTENDEE" property in an
   iCalendar object MUST be a fully qualified, [RFC-2822] address
   specification for the corresponding "Organizer" or "Attendee" of the
   "VEVENT" or "VTODO".

   Because [iTIP] does not preclude "Attendees" from forwarding
   "VEVENTS" or "VTODOS" to others, the [RFC-2822] "Sender" value may
   not equal that of the "Organizer". Additionally, the "Organizer" or
   "Attendee" cannot be reliably inferred by the [RFC-2822] "Sender" or
   "Reply-to" values of an iMIP message. The relevant address MUST be
   ascertained by opening the "text/calendar" MIME body part and
   examining the "ATTENDEE" and "ORGANIZER" properties.

2.4 Content Type

   A MIME body part containing content information that conforms to this
   document MUST have an [RFC-2045] "Content-Type" value of
   "text/calendar". The [RFC-2045] "Content-Type" header field MUST also
   include the type parameter "method". The value MUST be the same as
   the value of the "METHOD" calendar property within the iCalendar



Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track            FORMFEED[Page 6]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


   object.  This means that a MIME message containing multiple iCalendar
   objects with different method values must be further encapsulated
   with a "multipart/mixed" MIME entity. This will allow each of the
   iCalendar objects to be encapsulated within their own "text/calendar"
   MIME entity.

   Note that according to [iCAL] the default character set for iCalendar
   objects is UTF-8 [UTF-8].  However the default character set for a
   "text/*" MIME entity [RFC-2046] is US-ASCII. Thus a "charset"
   parameter MUST be present if the iCalendar object contains characters
   that are not part of the US-ASCII character set. [RFC-2046] discusses
   the selection of an appropriate "charset" value.

   The optional "component" parameter defines the iCalendar component
   type contained within the iCalendar object.

   The following is an example of this header field with a value that
   indicates an event message.

        Content-Type: text/calendar; method=request; charset=UTF-8;
              component=vevent

   The "text/calendar" content type allows for the scheduling message
   type to be included in a MIME message with other content information
   (i.e., "multipart/mixed") or included in a MIME message with a clear-
   text, human-readable form of the scheduling message (i.e.,
   "multipart/alternative").

   In order to permit the information in the scheduling message to be
   understood by MIME user agents (UA) that do not support the
   "text/calendar" content type, scheduling messages SHOULD be sent with
   an alternative, human-readable form of the information.

   Note that "multiple/alternative" MUST NOT be used to represent two
   slightly different iCalendar objects, for example two VEVENT with
   alternative starting times.

   <<CUA can use language and other parameters to pick a "text/calendar"
   part if a "multipart/alternative" MIME message contains more than one
   "text/calendar" part.>>

   Any receiving UA compliant with this specification MUST be able to
   process "text/calendar" body parts enclosed within "multipart/*".
   Note that a "multipart/mixed" MIME message can include multiple
   "text/calendar" components. The receiving UA MUST be able to process
   all of them.

2.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding



Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track            FORMFEED[Page 7]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


   Unless iMIP message is transported over 8-bit clean transport (such
   as SMTP [8BITMIME]), a transfer encoding such as quoted-printable or
   base64 [RFC-2045] MUST be used for iCalendar objects containing any
   characters that are not part of the US-ASCII character set.

   <<Add examples of 8bit and quoted-printable>>

2.6 Content-Disposition

   Implementations MAY include a "Content-Disposition" header field to
   define a file name for an iCalendar object.  However, the handling of
   a MIME part MUST be based on its [RFC-2045] "Content-Type" and not on
   the extension specified in the "Content-Disposition", as different
   email malware is known to trick User Agents into misinterpreting
   content of messages by specifying a file extension in the Content-
   Disposition header field that doesn't correspond to the value of
   Content-Type header field.


































Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track            FORMFEED[Page 8]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


3 Security Considerations

   The security threats that applications must address when implementing
   iTIP are detailed in [iTIP]. Two spoofing threats are identified:
   Spoofing the "Organizer", and Spoofing an "Attendee". To address
   these threats, the originator of an iCalendar object must be
   authenticated by a recipient. Once authenticated, a determination can
   be made as to whether or not the originator is authorized to perform
   the requested operation. Compliant applications MUST support signing
   and encrypting text/calendar attachments using a mechanism based on
   Security Multiparts for MIME [RFC-1847] to facilitate the
   authentication the originator of the iCalendar object.
   Implementations MAY provide a means for users to disable signing and
   encrypting. The steps are described below:

   1. The iCalendar object MUST be signed by the "Organizer" sending an
   update or the "Attendee" sending a reply.

   2. Using the compliant security mechanism with [RFC-1847], determine
   who signed the iCalendar object. This is the "signer". Note that the
   signer is not necessarily the person sending an e-mail message since
   an e-mail message can be forwarded.

   3. Correlate the signer to an "ATTENDEE" property in the iCalendar
   object. If the signer cannot be correlated to an "ATTENDEE" property,
   ignore the message.

   4. Determine whether or not the "ATTENDEE" is authorized to perform
   the operation as defined by [iTIP]. If the conditions are not met,
   ignore the message.

   5. If all the above conditions are met, the message can be processed.

   To address the confidentiality security threats, signed iMIP messages
   SHOULD be encrypted by a mechanism based on Security Multiparts for
   MIME [RFC-1847].

   It is possible to receive iMIP messages sent by someone working on
   behalf of another "Calendar User". This is determined by examining
   the "sent-by" parameter in the relevant "ORGANIZER" or "ATTENDEE"
   property.  [iCAL] and [iTIP] provide no mechanism to verify that a
   "Calendar User" has authorized someone else to work on their behalf.
   To address this security issue, <<implementations MUST provide
   mechanisms for the "Calendar Users" to make that decision before
   applying changes from someone working on behalf of a "Calendar
   User">>.

   A security consideration associated with use of Content-Disposition



Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track            FORMFEED[Page 9]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


   header field is described in section 2.6.


















































Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track           FORMFEED[Page 10]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


4 Examples

4.1 Single Component With An ATTACH Property

   This minimal message shows how an iCalendar object references an
   attachment. The attachment is accessible via its URL.

   From: sman@netscape.example.com
   To: stevesil@microsoft.example.com
   Subject: Phone Conference
   Mime-Version: 1.0
   Content-Type: text/calendar; method=REQUEST; charset=US-ASCII
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

   BEGIN:VCALENDAR
   PRODID:-//ACME/DesktopCalendar//EN
   METHOD:REQUEST
   VERSION:2.0
   BEGIN:VEVENT
   ORGANIZER:mailto:sman@netscape.example.com
   ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:mailto:sman@netscape.example.com
   ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES:mailto:stevesil@microsoft.example.com
   DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
   DTSTART:19970701T210000Z
   DTEND:19970701T230000Z
   SUMMARY:Phone Conference
   DESCRIPTION:Please review the attached document.
   UID:calsvr.example.com-873970198738777
   ATTACH:ftp://ftp.bar.example.com/pub/docs/foo.doc
   STATUS:CONFIRMED
   END:VEVENT
   END:VCALENDAR

4.2 Using Multipart Alternative for Low Fidelity Clients

   This example shows how a client can emit a multipart message that
   includes both a plain text version as well as the full iCalendar
   object.  Clients that do not support text/calendar will still be
   capable of rendering the plain text representation.

   From: foo1@example.com
   To: foo2@example.com
   Subject: Phone Conference
   Mime-Version: 1.0
   Content-Type: multipart/alternative;boundary="01BD3665.3AF0D360"

   --01BD3665.3AF0D360
   Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii



Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track           FORMFEED[Page 11]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

   This is an alternative representation of a TEXT/CALENDAR MIME Object
   When: 7/1/1997 10:00AM PDT - 7/1/97 10:30AM PDT
   Where:
   Organizer: foo1@example.com
   Summary: Phone Conference

   --01BD3665.3AF0D360
   Content-Type: text/calendar; method=REQUEST; charset=US-ASCII
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

   BEGIN:VCALENDAR
   PRODID:-//ACME/DesktopCalendar//EN
   METHOD:REQUEST
   VERSION:2.0
   BEGIN:VEVENT
   ORGANIZER:mailto:foo1@example.com
   ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:mailto:foo1@example.com
   ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo2@example.com
   DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
   DTSTART:19970701T170000Z
   DTEND:19970701T173000Z
   SUMMARY:Phone Conference
   UID:calsvr.example.com-8739701987387771
   SEQUENCE:0
   STATUS:CONFIRMED
   END:VEVENT
   END:VCALENDAR

   --01BD3665.3AF0D360

4.3 Single Component With An ATTACH Property and Inline Attachment

   This example shows how a message containing an iCalendar object
   references an attached document. The reference is made using a
   Content-id (CID). Thus, the iCalendar object and the document are
   packaged in a multipart/related encapsulation.

   From: foo1@example.com
   To: foo2@example.com
   Subject: Phone Conference
   Mime-Version: 1.0
   Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="boundary-example-1"

   --boundary-example-1

   Content-Type: text/calendar; method=REQUEST; charset=US-ASCII



Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track           FORMFEED[Page 12]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
   Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="event.vcs"

   BEGIN:VCALENDAR
   PRODID:-//ACME/DesktopCalendar//EN
   METHOD:REQUEST
   VERSION:2.0
   BEGIN:VEVENT
   ORGANIZER:mailto:foo1@example.com
   ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:mailto:foo1@example.com
   ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo2@example.com
   DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
   DTSTART:19970701T180000Z
   DTEND:19970701T183000Z
   SUMMARY:Phone Conference
   UID:calsvr.example.com-8739701987387771
   ATTACH:cid:123456789@example.com
   SEQUENCE:0
   STATUS:CONFIRMED
   END:VEVENT
   END:VCALENDAR

   --boundary-example-1
   Content-Type: application/msword; name="FieldReport.doc"
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
   Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="FieldReport.doc"
   Content-ID: <123456789@example.com>

   0M8R4KGxGuEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPgADAP7/CQAGAAAAAAAAAAABAAAARAAAAAAA
   AAAAEAAAQAAAAAEAAAD+////AAAAAEUAAAD/////////////////////////////////
    ...

   --boundary-example-1--

4.4 Multiple Similar Components

   Multiple iCalendar components of the same type can be included in the
   iCalendar object when the METHOD is the same for each component.

   From: foo1@example.com
   To: foo2@example.com
   Subject: Summer Company Holidays
   Mime-Version: 1.0
   Content-Type: text/calendar; method=PUBLISH; charset=US-ASCII
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
   Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="event.vcs"





Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track           FORMFEED[Page 13]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


   BEGIN:VCALENDAR
   PRODID:-//ACME/DESKTOPCALENDAR//EN
   METHOD:PUBLISH
   VERSION:2.0
   BEGIN:VEVENT
   ORGANIZER:MAILTO:FOO1@EXAMPLE.COM
   DTSTAMP:19970611T150000Z
   DTSTART:19970701T150000Z
   DTEND:19970701T230000Z
   SUMMARY:Company Picnic
   DESCRIPTION:Food and drink will be provided
   UID:CALSVR.EXAMPLE.COM-873970198738777-1
   SEQUENCE:0
   STATUS:CONFIRMED
   END:VEVENT
   BEGIN:VEVENT
   ORGANIZER:MAILTO:FOO1@EXAMPLE.COM
   DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
   DTSTART:19970715T150000Z
   DTEND:19970715T230000Z
   SUMMARY:Company Bowling Tournament
   DESCRIPTION:We have 10 lanes reserved
   UID:CALSVR.EXAMPLE.COM-873970198738777-2
   SEQUENCE:0
   STATUS:CONFIRMED
   END:VEVENT
   END:VCALENDAR

4.5 Multiple Mixed Components

   Different component types must be encapsulated in separate iCalendar
   objects.

   From: foo1@example.com
   To: foo2@example.com
   Subject: Phone Conference
   Mime-Version: 1.0
   Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="--FEE3790DC7E35189CA67CE2C"

   This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

   ----FEE3790DC7E35189CA67CE2C
   Content-Type: text/calendar; method=REQUEST; charset=US-ASCII
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
   Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="event1.vcs"






Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track           FORMFEED[Page 14]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


   BEGIN:VCALENDAR
   PRODID:-//ACME/DesktopCalendar//EN
   METHOD:REQUEST
   VERSION:2.0
   BEGIN:VEVENT
   ORGANIZER:mailto:foo1@example.com
   ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:mailto:foo1@example.com
   ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo2@example.com
   DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
   DTSTART:19970701T210000Z
   DTEND:19970701T230000Z
   SUMMARY:Phone Conference
   DESCRIPTION:Discuss what happened at the last meeting
   UID:calsvr.example.com-8739701987387772
   SEQUENCE:0
   STATUS:CONFIRMED
   END:VEVENT
   END:VCALENDAR

   ----FEE3790DC7E35189CA67CE2C
   Content-Type: text/calendar; method=REQUEST; charset=US-ASCII
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
   Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="todo1.vcs"

   BEGIN:VCALENDAR
   PRODID:-//ACME/DesktopCalendar//EN
   METHOD:REQUEST
   VERSION:2.0
   BEGIN:VTODO
   DUE:19970701T090000-0700
   ORGANIZER:mailto:foo1@example.com
   ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:mailto:foo1@example.com
   ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES:mailto:foo2@example.com
   SUMMARY:Phone Conference
   DESCRIPTION:Discuss a new location for the company picnic
   UID:calsvr.example.com-td-8739701987387773
   SEQUENCE:0
   STATUS:NEEDS ACTION
   END:VEVENT
   END:VCALENDAR

   ----FEE3790DC7E35189CA67CE2C









Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track           FORMFEED[Page 15]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


4.6 Detailed Components With An ATTACH Property

   This example shows the format of a message containing a group meeting
   between three individuals. The multipart/related encapsulation is
   used because the iCalendar object contains an ATTACH property that
   uses a CID to reference the attachment.

   From: foo1@example.com
   MIME-Version: 1.0
   To: foo2@example.com,foo3@example.com
   Subject: REQUEST - Phone Conference
   Content-Type: multipart/related;boundary="--FEE3790DC7E35189CA67CE2C"

   ----FEE3790DC7E35189CA67CE2C
   Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
                 boundary="--00FEE3790DC7E35189CA67CE2C00"

   ----00FEE3790DC7E35189CA67CE2C00
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

   When: 7/1/1997 10:00PM PDT- 7/1/97 10:30 PM PDT
   Where:
   Organizer: foo1@example.com
   Summary: Let's discuss the attached document

   ----00FEE3790DC7E35189CA67CE2C00

   Content-Type: text/calendar; method=REQUEST; charset=US-ASCII;
                    Component=vevent
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
   Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="event.vcs"

   BEGIN:VCALENDAR
   PRODID:-//ACME/DesktopCalendar//EN
   PROFILE:REQUEST
   PROFILE-VERSION:1.0
   VERSION:2.0
   BEGIN:VEVENT
   ORGANIZER:foo1@example.com
   ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:foo1@example.com
   ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo2@example.com
   ATTENDEE;RSVP=YES;TYPE=INDIVIDUAL:mailto:foo3@example.com
   DTSTAMP:19970611T190000Z
   DTSTART:19970621T170000Z
   DTEND:199706211T173000Z
   SUMMARY:Let's discuss the attached document
   UID:calsvr.example.com-873970198738777-8aa



Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track           FORMFEED[Page 16]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


   ATTACH:cid:calsvr.example.com-12345aaa
   SEQUENCE:0
   STATUS:CONFIRMED
   END:VEVENT
   END:VCALENDAR

   ----00FEE3790DC7E35189CA67CE2C00

   ----FEE3790DC7E35189CA67CE2C
   Content-Type: application/msword; name="FieldReport.doc"
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
   Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="FieldReport.doc"
   Content-ID: <calsvr.example.com-12345aaa>


   R0lGODdhTAQZAJEAAFVVVd3d3e4AAP///ywAAAAATAQZAAAC/5yPOSLhD6OctNqLs94Xq
   AG4kiW5omm6sq27gvH8kzX9o1y+s73/g8MCofEovGITCoxKMbyCR16cNSq9YrNarfcrvd
   riIH5LL5jE6rxc3G+v2cguf0uv2Oz+v38L7/DxgoOKjURnjIIbe3yNjo+AgZWYVIWWl5i
   ZnJY6J
    ...

   ----FEE3790DC7E35189CA67CE2C

5 Recommended Practices

   This section outlines a series of recommended practices when using a
   messaging transport to exchange iCalendar objects.

5.1 Use of Content and Message IDs

   The [iCAL] specification makes frequent use of the URI for data types
   in properties such as "DESCRIPTION", "ATTACH", "CONTACT" and others.
   Two forms of URIs are Message ID (MID) and Content ID (CID). These
   are defined in [RFC-2392]. Although [RFC-2392] allows referencing
   messages or MIME body parts in other MIME entities or stores, it is
   strongly recommended that iMIP implementations include all referenced
   messages and body parts in a single MIME entity. Simply put, if an
   iCalendar object contains CID or MID references to other messages or
   body parts, implementations should ensure that these messages and/or
   body parts are transmitted with the iCalendar object. If they are not
   there is no guarantee that the receiving CUA will have the access or
   the authorization to view those objects.









Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track           FORMFEED[Page 17]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


6 IANA Considerations

   Registration of text/calendar MIME Media Type is done in [iCal].

   This document doesn't require any additional actions from IANA.

7 References

7.1 Normative References

   [iCAL]     Desruisseaux, B., (Ed.), "Internet Calendaring and
   Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar)", work in progress,
   draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2445bis-XX.txt (Updated RFC 2445)

   [iTIP]     Daboo, C., "iCalendar Transport-Independent
   Interoperability Protocol (iTIP)", work in progress, draft-ietf-
   calsify-2446bis-XX.txt (Updates RFC 2446)

   [RFC-2822] Resnick, P., "Internet Message Format", RFC 2822, April
   2001.

   [RFC-1847] Galvin, J., Murphy, S., Crocker, S. and N. Freed,
   "Security Multiparts for MIME: Multipart/Signed and
   Multipart/Encrypted", RFC 1847, October 1995.

   [RFC-2045] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
   Extensions (MIME) - Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies", RFC
   2045, November 1996.

   [RFC-2046] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
   Extensions (MIME) - Part Two: Media Types", RFC 2046, November 1996.

   [RFC-2047] Moore, K., "Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) -
   Part Three: Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text", RFC 2047,
   November 1996.

   [RFC-2048] Freed, N., Klensin, J. and J. Postel, "Multipurpose
   Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) - Part Four: Registration
   Procedures", RFC 2048, January 1997.

   [RFC-2049] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
   Extensions (MIME) Part Five: Conformance Criteria and Examples", RFC
   2049, November 1996.

   [RFC-2392] Levinson, E., "Content-ID and Message-ID Uniform Resource
   Locators", RFC 2392, August 1998.

   [RFC-2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate



Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track           FORMFEED[Page 18]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


   Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [UTF-8] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646",
   STD 63, RFC 3629, November 2003.

7.2 Informative References

   [8BITMIME]   Klensin, J., Freed, N., Rose, M., Stefferud, E., and D.
   Crocker, "SMTP Service Extension for 8bit-MIMEtransport", RFC 1652,
   July 1994.









































Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track           FORMFEED[Page 19]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


8 Editor's Addresses

   The following address information is provided in a vCard v3.0,
   Electronic Business Card, format.

   BEGIN:VCARD
   VERSION:3.0
   N:Melnikov;Alexey
   FN:Alexey Melnikov
   ORG:Isode Ltd.
   ADR;TYPE=WORK,POSTAL,PARCEL:;;5 Castle Business Village,
    36 Station Road;Hampton;Middlesex;TW12 2BX;UK
   EMAIL;TYPE=INTERNET:Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com
   END:VCARD





































Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track           FORMFEED[Page 20]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


9.  Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.


10.   Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
   ipr@ietf.org.

Appendix A.   Changes since RFC 2447.




Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track           FORMFEED[Page 21]


RFC 2447bis                       iMIP                        March 2006


   Updated references. Split them into Normative and Informative.

   Updated examples to use example.com/example.net domains.

   Corrected usage of RFC 2119 language.

   Clarified that charset=UTF-8 is required, unless the calendar can be
   entirely represented in US-ASCII.

   Clarified that 7-bit content transfer encodings should be used unless
   the calendar object is known to be transferred over 8-bit clean
   transport.

   Clarified that file extension specified in the Content-Disposition
   header field is not to be used to override the Content-Type MIME
   type.

   Disallow use of "multiple/alternative" for slightly different
   representations of the same calendar.

   <<TBD>>






























Melnikov (Ed.)               Standards Track           FORMFEED[Page 22]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129c, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/