[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: (draft-bernstein-ccamp-wson-encode) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RFC 7581

Network Working Group                                      G. Bernstein
Internet Draft                                        Grotto Networking
Intended status: Standards Track                                 Y. Lee
Expires: September 2009                                           D. Li
                                                                 Huawei
                                                             W. Imajuku
                                                                    NTT


                                                          March 3, 2009

        Routing and Wavelength Assignment Information Encoding for
                   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks


                  draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-01.txt


Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html

   This Internet-Draft will expire on September 3, 2009.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors. All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents



Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document. Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.

Abstract

   A wavelength switched optical network (WSON) requires that certain
   key information elements are made available to facilitate path
   computation and the establishment of label switching paths (LSPs).
   The information model described in "Routing and Wavelength Assignment
   Information for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks" shows what
   information is required at specific points in the WSON.

   The information may be used in Generalized Multiprotocol Label
   Switching (GMPLS) signaling protocols, and may be distributed by
   GMPLS routing protocols. Other distribution mechanisms (for example,
   XML-based protocols) may also be used.

   This document provides efficient, protocol-agnostic encodings for the
   information elements necessary to operate a WSON. It is intended that
   protocol-specific documents will reference this memo to describe how
   information is carried for specific uses.



Conventions used in this document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119 [RFC2119].

Table of Contents


   1. Introduction...................................................3
      1.1. Revision History..........................................4
         1.1.1. Changes from 00 draft................................4
   2. Terminology....................................................4
   3. Encoding of WSON Information: Sub-TLVs.........................5
      3.1. Link Set Sub-TLV..........................................5
      3.2. Connectivity Matrix Sub-TLV...............................6
      3.3. Wavelength Information Encoding..........................10
      3.4. Wavelength Set Sub-TLV...................................11
         3.4.1. Inclusive/Exclusive Wavelength Lists................11
         3.4.2. Inclusive/Exclusive Wavelength Ranges...............12



Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


         3.4.3. Bitmap Wavelength Set...............................12
      3.5. Port Wavelength Restriction sub-TLV......................14
      3.6. Wavelength Converter Set Sub-TLV.........................15
      3.7. Wavelength Converter Accessibility Sub-TLV...............16
      3.8. Wavelength Conversion Range Sub-TLV......................19
      3.9. WC Usage State Sub-TLV...................................21
   4. Composite TLVs................................................22
      4.1. WSON Node TLV............................................22
      4.2. WSON Link TLV............................................23
      4.3. WSON Dynamic Link TLV....................................24
      4.4. WSON Dynamic Node TLV....................................24
   5. Security Considerations.......................................24
   6. IANA Considerations...........................................24
   7. Acknowledgments...............................................25
   8. References....................................................26
      8.1. Normative References.....................................26
      8.2. Informative References...................................26
   9. Contributors..................................................28
   Authors' Addresses...............................................28
   Intellectual Property Statement..................................29
   Disclaimer of Validity...........................................30

1. Introduction

   A Wavelength Switched Optical Network (WSON) is a Wavelength Division
   Multiplexing (WDM) optical network in which switching is performed
   selectively based on the center wavelength of an optical signal.

   [WSON-Frame] describes a framework for Generalized Multiprotocol
   Label Switching (GMPLS) and Path Computation Element (PCE) control of
   a WSON. Based on this framework, [WSON-Info] describes an information
   model that specifies what information is needed at various points in
   a WSON in order to compute paths and establish Label Switched Paths
   (LSPs).

   This document provides efficient encodings of information needed by
   the routing and wavelength assignment (RWA) process in a WSON. Such
   encodings can be used to extend GMPLS signaling and routing
   protocols. In addition these encodings could be used by other
   mechanisms to convey this same information to a path computation
   element (PCE). Note that since these encodings are relatively
   efficient they can provide more accurate analysis of the control
   plane communications/processing load for WSONs looking to utilize a
   GMPLS control plane.





Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


1.1. Revision History

   1.1.1. Changes from 00 draft

   Edits to make consistent with update to [Otani], i.e., removal of
   sign bit.

   Clarification of TBD on connection matrix type and possibly
   numbering.

   New sections for wavelength converter pool encoding: Wavelength
   Converter Set Sub-TLV, Wavelength Converter Accessibility Sub-TLV,
   Wavelength Conversion Range Sub-TLV, WC Usage State Sub-TLV.

   Added optional wavelength converter pool TLVs to the composite node
   TLV.

2. Terminology

   CWDM: Coarse Wavelength Division Multiplexing.

   DWDM: Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing.

   FOADM: Fixed Optical Add/Drop Multiplexer.

   ROADM: Reconfigurable Optical Add/Drop Multiplexer. A reduced port
   count wavelength selective switching element featuring ingress and
   egress line side ports as well as add/drop side ports.

   RWA: Routing and Wavelength Assignment.

   Wavelength Conversion. The process of converting an information
   bearing optical signal centered at a given wavelength to one with
   "equivalent" content centered at a different wavelength. Wavelength
   conversion can be implemented via an optical-electronic-optical (OEO)
   process or via a strictly optical process.

   WDM: Wavelength Division Multiplexing.

   Wavelength Switched Optical Network (WSON): A WDM based optical
   network in which switching is performed selectively based on the
   center wavelength of an optical signal.







Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


3. Encoding of WSON Information: Sub-TLVs

   A TLV encoding of the high level WSON information model [WSON-Info]
   is given in the following sections. This encoding is designed to be
   suitable for use in the GMPLS routing protocols OSPF [RFC4203] and
   IS-IS [RFC5307] and in the PCE protocol PCEP [PCEP]. Note that the
   information distributed in [RFC4203] and [RFC5307] is arranged via
   the nesting of sub-TLVs within TLVs and this document makes use of
   such constructs.

3.1. Link Set Sub-TLV

   We will frequently need to describe properties of groups of links. To
   do so efficiently we can make use of a link set concept similar to
   the label set concept of [RFC3471]. All links will be denoted by
   their local link identifier as defined an used in [RFC4202],
   [RFC4203], and [RFC5307].

   The information carried in a Link Set is defined by:

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |    Action     |Dir|  Format   |         Reserved              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                       Link Identifier 1                       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      :                               :                               :
      :                               :                               :
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                       Link Identifier N                       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


      Action: 8 bits

         0 - Inclusive List

   Indicates that the TLV contains one or more link elements that are
   included in the Link Set.

         2 - Inclusive Range

   Indicates that the TLV contains a range of links.  The object/TLV
   contains two link elements. The first element indicates the start of
   the range. The second element indicates the end of the range. A value



Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


   of zero indicates that there is no bound on the corresponding portion
   of the range.

   Dir: Directionality of the Link Set (2 bits)

   0 -- bidirectional

   1 -- incoming

   2 -- outgoing

   In optical networks we think in terms of unidirectional as well as
   bidirectional links. For example, wavelength restrictions or
   connectivity may be different for an ingress port, than for its
   "companion" egress port if one exists. Note that "interfaces" such as
   those discussed in the Interfaces MIB [RFC2863] are assumed to be
   bidirectional. This also applies to the links advertised in various
   link state routing protocols.

   Format: The format of the link identifier (6 bits)

   0 -- Link Local Identifier

   Others TBD.

   Note that all link identifiers in the same list must be of the same
   type.

   Reserved: 16 bits

   This field is reserved. It MUST be set to zero on transmission and
   MUST be ignored on receipt.

      Link Identifier:

   The link identifier represents the port which is being described
   either for connectivity or wavelength restrictions. This can be the
   link local identifier of [RFC4202], GMPLS routing, [RFC4203] GMPLS
   OSPF routing, and [RFC5307] IS-IS GMPLS routing. The use of the link
   local identifier format can result in more compact WSON encodings
   when the assignments are done in a reasonable fashion.

3.2. Connectivity Matrix Sub-TLV

   The switch and fixed connectivity matrices of [WSON-Info] can be
   compactly represented in terms of a minimal list of ingress and



Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009                [Page 6]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


   egress port set pairs that have mutual connectivity. As described in
   [Switch] such a minimal list representation leads naturally to a
   graph representation for path computation purposes that involves the
   fewest additional nodes and links.

   A TLV encoding of this list of link set pairs is:

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | Connectivity  |               Reserved                        |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                         Link Set A #1                         |
      :                               :                               :
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                         Link Set B #1                         :
      :                               :                               :
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                       Additional Link set pairs as needed     |
      :                     to specify connectivity                   :
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


   Where Connectivity = 0 if the device is fixed

                        1 if the device is switched(e.g., ROADM/OXC)

   TBD: Should we just have two sub-TLVs one for fixed one for switched,
   or should we number matrices for a more general solution.

   Example:

   Suppose we have a typical 2-degree 40 channel ROADM. In addition to
   its two line side ports it has 80 add and 80 drop ports. The picture
   below illustrates how a typical 2-degree ROADM system that works with
   bi-directional fiber pairs is a highly asymmetrical system composed
   of two unidirectional ROADM subsystems.












Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009                [Page 7]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


                         (Tributary) Ports #3-#42
                     Ingress added to    Egress dropped from
                     West Line Egress    East Line Ingress
                           vvvvv          ^^^^^
                          | |||.|        | |||.|
                    +-----| |||.|--------| |||.|------+
                    |    +----------------------+     |
                    |    |                      |     |
        Egress      |    | Unidirectional ROADM |     |    Ingress
   -----------------+    |                      |     +--------------
   <=====================|                      |===================<
   -----------------+    +----------------------+     +--------------
                    |                                 |
        Port #1     |                                 |   Port #2
   (West Line Side) |                                 |(East Line Side)
   -----------------+    +----------------------+     +--------------
   >=====================|                      |===================>
   -----------------+    | Unidirectional ROADM |     +--------------
        Ingress     |    |                      |     |    Egress
                    |    |              _       |     |
                    |    +----------------------+     |
                    +-----| |||.|--------| |||.|------+
                          | |||.|        | |||.|
                           vvvvv          ^^^^^
                     (Tributary) Ports #43-#82
                Egress dropped from    Ingress added to
                West Line ingress      East Line egress


   Referring to the figure we see that the ingress direction of ports
   #3-#42 (add ports) can only connect to the egress on port #1. While
   the ingress side of port #2 (line side) can only connect to the
   egress on ports #3-#42 (drop) and to the egress on port #1 (pass
   through). Similarly, the ingress direction of ports #43-#82 can only
   connect to the egress on port #2 (line). While the ingress direction
   of port #1 can only connect to the egress on ports #43-#82 (drop) or
   port #2 (pass through). We can now represent this potential
   connectivity matrix as follows. This representation uses only 30 32-
   bit words.










Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009                [Page 8]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009



       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |    Conn = 1   |                 Reserved                      |1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                          Note: adds to line
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  Action=2     |0 1|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved(Note:inclusive range) |2
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #3                |3
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #42               |4
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  Action=0     |1 0|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved (Note:inclusive list) |5
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #1                |6
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                       Note: line to drops
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  Action=0     |0 1|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved (Note:inclusive list) |7
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #2                |8
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  Action=2     |1 0|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved(Note: inclusive range)|9
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #3                |10
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #42               |11
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                       Note: line to line
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  Action=0     |0 1|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved (Note:inclusive list) |12
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #2                |13
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  Action=0     |1 0|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved(Note: inclusive range)|14
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #1                |15
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                                Note: adds to line
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  Action=2     |0 1|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved(Note:inclusive range) |16
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #42               |17
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+



Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009                [Page 9]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


     |                     Link Local Identifier = #82               |18
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  Action=0     |1 0|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved (Note:inclusive list) |19
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #2                |20
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                       Note: line to drops
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  Action=0     |0 1|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved (Note:inclusive list) |21
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #1                |22
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  Action=2     |1 0|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved(Note: inclusive range)|23
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #43               |24
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #82               |25
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                       Note: line to line
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  Action=0     |0 1|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved (Note:inclusive list) |26
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #1                |27
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  Action=0     |1 0|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved(Note: inclusive range)|28
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                     Link Local Identifier = #2                |30
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

3.3. Wavelength Information Encoding

   This document makes frequent use of the lambda label format defined
   in [Otani] shown below strictly for reference purposes:

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |Grid |  C.S. |  Reserved       |               n               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   Where

   Grid is used to indicate which ITU-T grid specification is being
   used.

   C.S. = Channel spacing used in a DWDM system, i.e., with a ITU-T
   G.694.1 grid.



Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 10]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


   n = Used to specify the frequency as 193.1THz +/- n*(channel spacing)
   and n is an integer to take either a negative, zero or a positive
   value.

3.4. Wavelength Set Sub-TLV

   Wavelength sets come up frequently in WSONs to describe the range of
   a laser transmitter, the wavelength restrictions on ROADM ports, or
   the availability of wavelengths on a DWDM link. The general format
   for a wavelength set is given below. This format uses the Action
   concept from [RFC3471] with an additional Action to define a "bit
   map" type of label set. Note that the second 32 bit field is a lambda
   label in the previously defined format. This provides important
   information on the WDM grid type and channel spacing that will be
   used in the compact encodings listed.

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     | Action        |   Reserved    |    Num Wavelengths            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |Grid |  C.S. |    Reserved     |  n  for lowest frequency      |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |     Additional fields as necessary per action                 |
     |



   Action:

   0 - Inclusive List

   1 - Exclusive List

   2 - Inclusive Range

   3 - Exclusive Range

   4 - Bitmap Set

   3.4.1. Inclusive/Exclusive Wavelength Lists

   In the case of the inclusive/exclusive lists the wavelength set
   format is given by:





Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 11]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |Action=0 or 1  | Reserved      |      Num Wavelengths          |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |Grid |  C.S. |      Reserved   |    n  for lowest frequency    |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |    n2                         |          n3                   |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     :                                                               :
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |    nm                         |                                |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   Where Num Wavelengths tells us the number of wavelength in this
   inclusive or exclusive list this does not include the initial
   wavelength in the list hence if the number of wavelengths is odd then
   zero padding of the last half word is required.

   3.4.2. Inclusive/Exclusive Wavelength Ranges

   In the case of inclusive/exclusive ranges the wavelength set format
   is given by:

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |Action=2 or 3  | Reserved      |      Num Wavelengths          |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |Grid |  C.S. |    Reserved     |      n  for lowest frequency  |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   In this case Num Wavelengths specifies the number of wavelengths in
   the range starting at the given wavelength and incrementing the Num
   Wavelengths number of channel spacing up in frequency.

   3.4.3. Bitmap Wavelength Set

   In the case of Action = 4, the bitmap the wavelength set format is
   given by:










Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 12]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     | Action = 4    | Reserved    |      Num Wavelengths            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |Grid |  C.S. |    Reserved   |      n  for lowest frequency    |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |    Bit Map Word #1 (Lowest frequency channels)                |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     :                                                               :
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |    Bit Map Word #N (Highest frequency channels)               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


   Where Num Wavelengths in this case tells us the number of wavelengths
   represented by the bit map. Each bit in the bit map represents a
   particular frequency with a value of 1/0 indicating whether the
   frequency is in the set or not. Bit position zero represents the
   lowest frequency, while each succeeding bit position represents the
   next frequency a channel spacing (C.S.) above the previous.

   The size of the bit map is clearly Num Wavelengths bits, but the bit
   map is made up to a full multiple of 32 bits so that the TLV is a
   multiple of four bytes. Bits that do not represent wavelengths (i.e.,
   those in positions (Num Wavelengths - 1) and beyond) SHOULD be set to
   zero and MUST be ignored.

   Example:

   A 40 channel C-Band DWDM system with 100GHz spacing with lowest
   frequency 192.0THz (1561.4nm) and highest frequency 195.9THz
   (1530.3nm). These frequencies correspond to n = -11, and n = 28
   respectively. Now suppose the following channels are available:















Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 13]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


   Frequency (THz)    n Value      bit map position
   --------------------------------------------------
      192.0             -11               0
      192.5              -6               5
      193.1               0              11
      193.9               8              19
      194.0               9              20
      195.2              21              32
      195.8              27              38

   With the Grid value set to indicate an ITU-T G.694.1 DWDM grid, C.S.
   set to indicate 100GHz this lambda bit map set would then be encoded
   as follows:



      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     | Action = 4    | Reserved      |    Num Wavelengths = 40       |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |Grid |  C.S. |      Reserved   | n  for lowest frequency = -11 |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0|
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0|   Not used in 40 Channel system (all zeros)   |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+



3.5. Port Wavelength Restriction sub-TLV

   The port wavelength restriction of [WSON-Info] can be encoded as a
   sub-TLV as follows.















Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 14]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |RestrictionKind|T|  Reserved   |     MaxNumChannels            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                  --Wavelength Set--
     | Action        |   Reserved    |    Num Wavelengths            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |Grid |  C.S. |    Reserved     |  n  for lowest frequency      |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |     Additional fields as necessary per action                 |
     |                                                               |


   RestrictionKind can take the following values and meanings:

   0:   Simple wavelength selective restriction. Max number of channels
   indicates the number of wavelengths permitted on the port and the
   accompanying wavelength set indicates the permitted values.

   1:   Waveband device with a tunable center frequency and passband. In
   this case the maximum number of channels indicates the maximum width
   of the waveband in terms of the channels spacing given in the
   wavelength set. The corresponding wavelength set is used to indicate
   the overall tuning range. Specific center frequency tuning
   information can be obtained from dynamic channel in use information.
   It is assumed that both center frequency and bandwidth (Q) tuning can
   be done without causing faults in existing signals.

   Values for T include:

   0 == Use with a fixed connectivity matrix

   1 == Use with a switched connectivity matrix

   TBD: Should we just have two flavors of sub-TLV, or if we add
   numbering to identify matrices we could add a number field here
   (using currently reserved bits) to associate the constraints with the
   right matrix.

3.6. Wavelength Converter Set Sub-TLV

   A WSON node may include a set of wavelength converters (WC). We need
   to describe the WC list which a node supports. This can be done via a
   WC Set concept similar to the label set concept of [RFC3471].




Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 15]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


   The information carried in a WC set is defined by:
       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |    Action     |             Reserved                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |     WC Identifier 1           |        WC Identifier 2        |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      :                               :                               :
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |     WC Identifier n-1         |        WC Identifier n        |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


      Action: 8 bits

         0 - Inclusive List

   Indicates that the TLV contains one or more WC elements that are
   included in the list.

         2 - Inclusive Range

   Indicates that the TLV contains a range of WCs.  The object/TLV
   contains two WC elements. The first element indicates the start of
   the range. The second element indicates the end of the range. A value
   of zero indicates that there is no bound on the corresponding portion
   of the range.

      Reserved: 24 bits

   This field is reserved. It MUST be set to zero on transmission and
   MUST be ignored on receipt.

      WC Identifier:

   The WC identifier represents the ID of the wavelength convertor which
   is a 16 bit integer.

3.7. Wavelength Converter Accessibility Sub-TLV

   A WSON node may include wavelength converters. As described in [WSON-
   Info], we should give the accessibility of a wavelength converter to
   convert from a given ingress wavelength on a particular ingress
   port to a desired egress wavelength on a particular egress port.
   Before this, we need to describe the accessibility of a wavelength



Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 16]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


   converter to convert form a given ingress port to a desired egress
   port. This information can be determined by the PoolIngressMatrix and
   PoolEgressMatrix of [WSON-Info]. We can use a set of links (Link set)
   followed by a set of WCs (WC set) to represent that this link set can
   access this WC set. We use a set of WC (WC set) followed by a set of
   links (Link set) to represent that this WC set can access this link
   set.

   The wavelength converter accessibility TLV is defined by:

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | Num In Pairs  |          Reserved                             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                    Ingress Link Set A #1                      |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                          WC  Set A #1                         |
      :                               :                               :
      :                               :                               :
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |         Additional Link set and WC set pairs as needed to     |
      :                    specify PoolIngressMatrix                  :
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   WC Set B #1 (for egress connectivity)       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                      Egress link Set B #1                     |
      :                               :                               :
      :                               :                               :
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |         Additional WC set and egress link set pairs           |
      :              as needed to specify PoolEgressMatrix            :
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Where Num_In_Pairs tells us the number of ingress link and WC set
   pairs. TBD: if link sets are identified in their own sub-TLVs and
   similarly for WC sets then we may not need this field.

   Example:

   Figure 1 shows a wavelength converter pool architecture know as
   "shared per fiber". In this case the ingress and egress pool matrices
   are simply:






Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 17]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


              +-----+       +-----+
              | 1 1 |       | 1 0 |
          WI =|     |,  WE =|     |
              | 1 1 |       | 0 1 |
              +-----+       +-----+


                    +-----------+                      +------+
                    |           |--------------------->|      |
                    |           |--------------------->|  C   |
              /|    |           |--------------------->|  o   | E1
        I1   /D+--->|           |--------------------->|  m   |
            + e+--->|           |                      |  b   |========>
   ========>| M|    |  Optical  |    +-----------+     |  i   | Port #3
   Port #1  + u+--->|   Switch  |    |  WC Pool  |     |  n   |
             \x+--->|           |    |  +-----+  |     |  e   |
              \|    |           +----+->|WC #1|--+---->|  r   |
                    |           |    |  +-----+  |     +------+
                    |           |    |           |     +------+
              /|    |           |    |  +-----+  |     |      |
        I2   /D+--->|           +----+->|WC #2|--+---->|  C   | E2
            + e+--->|           |    |  +-----+  |     |  o   |
   ========>| M|    |           |    +-----------+     |  m   |========>
   Port #2  + u+--->|           |                      |  b   | Port #4
             \x+--->|           |--------------------->|  i   |
              \|    |           |--------------------->|  n   |
                    |           |--------------------->|  e   |
                    |           |--------------------->|  r   |
                    +-----------+                      +------+
    Figure 1 An optical switch featuring a shared per fiber wavelength
                       converter pool architecture.


   This wavelength converter pool can be encoded as follows:















Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 18]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | Num In Pairs=1|                   Reserved                    |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                  Note: I1,I2 can connect to either WC1 or WC2
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Action=0     |0 1|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved(Note: inclusive list) |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                     Link Local Identifier = #1                |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                     Link Local Identifier = #2                |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Action=0     |          Reserved(Note: inclusive WC list)    |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |           WC ID = #1          |       WC ID = #2              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                        Note: WC1 can only connect to E1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Action=0     |       Reserved(Note: inclusive list)          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |           WC ID = #1          |       zero padding            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Action=0     |1 0|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved(Note: inclusive list) |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                     Link Local Identifier = #3                |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                        Note: WC2 can only connect to E2
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Action=0     |       Reserved(Note: inclusive WC list)       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |           WC ID = #2          |       zero padding            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Action=0     |1 0|0 0 0 0 0 0|Reserved(Note: inclusive list) |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                     Link Local Identifier = #4                |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+




3.8. Wavelength Conversion Range Sub-TLV

   Since not all wavelengths can necessarily reach all the converters or
   the converters may have limited input wavelength range we can have a




Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 19]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


   set of ingress wavelength constraints for each wavelength converter.
   In addition, we also can have output wavelength constraints.

   The information carried in a wavelength conversion range Sub-TLV is
   defined by:

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                      Reserved                                 |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                     WC Set #1                                 |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                    Input Wavelength Set #1                    |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                    Output Wavelength Set #1                   |
      :                               :                               :
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |      Additional WC Wavelength constraint set pairs as needed  |
      :                                                               :
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


   WC Set:

   Indicates the WCs which have the same conversion range. We group the
   WCs which have the same conversion range to WC Set followed by the
   input and output wavelength range for reducing the data size.

   The format of WC Set is consistent with the encoding of "WC Set Sub-
   TLV".

   Input Wavelength Set:

   Indicates the wavelength input range of WC(s).

   The format of Input Wavelength Set is consistent with the encoding of
   "Wavelength Set Sub-TLV".

   Output Wavelength Set:

   Indicates the wavelength output range of WC(s).

   The format of Output Wavelength Set is consistent with the encoding
   of "Wavelength Set Sub-TLV".




Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 20]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009




   Example:

   We give an example based on figure 1 about how to represent the
   wavelength conversion range of wavelength converters. Suppose the
   wavelength range of input and output of WC1 and WC2 are {L1, L2, L3,
   L4}:

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                      Reserved                                 |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                             Note: WC Set
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Action=0     |0 1|      Reserved(Note: inclusive list)       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |           WC ID = #1          |       WC ID = #2              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                             Note: wavelength input range
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | Action = 2    |   Reserved    |    Num Wavelengths = 4        |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |Grid |  C.S. |     Reserved    |  n for lowest frequency = 1   |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                             Note: wavelength output range
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | Action = 2    |   Reserved    |    Num Wavelengths = 4        |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |Grid |  C.S. |     Reserved    |  n for lowest frequency = 1   |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


3.9. WC Usage State Sub-TLV

   WC Usage state dependents upon whether the wavelength converter in
   the pool is in use. This is the only state kept in the converter pool
   model.










Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 21]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                     WC Set sub-TLV                           |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                     WC Usage state                            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                     ......             |      Padded bits     |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   WC Usage state can be encoded by bit map. The bits indicate the usage
   state of the wavelength convertors which is being described in the WC
   Set sub-TLV.

   WC Usage state: : Variable Length.

   Each bit indicates the usage status of one WC. The sequence of the
   bit map is consistent with the WC list in this TLV.

   Padded bit: Variable Length

   It is used to pad the bit to make the whole number of bits in bitmap
   be the time of 32. Padded bit MUST be set to 0.

4. Composite TLVs

   The Four composite TLVs in the following sections are based on the
   four high level information bundles of [WSON-Info].

4.1. WSON Node TLV

   The WSON Node TLV consists of the following ordered list of sub-TLVs:

   <Node_Info> ::= <Node_ID> [<SwitchedConnectivityMatrix>]
   [<FixedConnectivityMatrix>], [<SRNG>] [<WavelengthConverterPool>]

   o  Node ID (This will be derived from standard IETF node identifiers)

   o  Switch Connectivity Matrix - (optional) This is a connectivity
      matrix sub-TLV with the connectivity type set to "switched" (conn
      = 1)

   o  Fixed Connectivity Matrix - (optional) This is a connectivity
      matrix sub-TLV with the connectivity type set to "fixed" (conn =
      0).




Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 22]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


   o  Shared Risk Node Group - (optional) Format TBD (note that current
      GMPLS SRLG encoding is general enough to include SRNG
      information).

   o  Wavelength Converter Pool TLVs- (optional) Wavelength Converter
      Set Sub-TLV, Wavelength Converter Accessibility Sub-TLV, and
      Wavelength Conversion Range Sub-TLV.

4.2. WSON Link TLV

   Note that a number of sub-TLVs for links have already been defined
   and it is for further study if we can or should reuse any of those
   sub-TLVs in our encoding. Note that for a system already employing
   GMPLS based routing the existing encodings and transport mechanisms
   should be used and the information does not need to appear twice.

   <LinkInfo> ::=  <LinkID> [<AdministrativeGroup>] [<InterfaceCapDesc>]
   [<Protection>] [<SRLG>]... [<TrafficEngineeringMetric>]
   [<MaximumBandwidthPerChannel>] <[SwitchedPortWavelengthRestriction>]
   [<FixedPortWavelengthRestriction>]

   o  Link Identifier - Need to double check on this with RFC4203
      (required).

   o  Administrative Group - (optional) Standard sub-TLV type 9,
      RFC3630.

   o  Interface Switching Capability Descriptor - Standard sub-TLV type
      15, RFC4203.

   o  Protection - (optional) Standard sub-TLV type 15, RFC4203.

   o  Shared Risk Link Group - (optional) Standard sub-TLV 16, RFC4203.

   o  Traffic Engineering Metric - (optional) Standard sub-TLV type 5,
      RFC3630.

   o  Maximum Bandwidth per Channel - TBD.

   o  Switched Port Wavelength Restriction - (optional) The port
      wavelength restriction sub-TLV with T = 1.

   o  Fixed Port Wavelength Restriction - (optional) The port wavelength
      restriction sub-TLV with T = 0.





Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 23]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


4.3. WSON Dynamic Link TLV

   <DynamicLinkInfo> ::=  <LinkID> <AvailableWavelengths>
   [<SharedBackupWavelengths>]

   Where

   <LinkID> ::= <LocalLinkID> <LocalNodeID> <RemoteLinkID>
   <RemoteNodeID>

   o  Available Wavelengths - A wavelength set sub-TLV used to indicate
      which wavelengths are available on this link.

   o  Shared Backup Wavelengths - (optional) A wavelength set sub-TLV
      used to indicate which wavelengths on this link are currently used
      for shared backup protection (and hence can possibly be reused).

4.4. WSON Dynamic Node TLV

   <NodeInfoDynamic> ::= <NodeID> [<WCPoolState>]

   o  Node ID - Format TBD.

   o  Wavelength Converter Pool Status - (optional) This is the WC Usage
      state sub-TLV.

   Note that currently the only dynamic information modeled with a node
   is associated with the status of the wavelength converter pool.

5. Security Considerations

   This document defines protocol-independent encodings for WSON
   information and does not introduce any security issues.

   However, other documents that make use of these encodings within
   protocol extensions need to consider the issues and risks associated
   with, inspection, interception, modification, or spoofing of any of
   this information. It is expected that any such documents will
   describe the necessary security measures to provide adequate
   protection.

6. IANA Considerations

   TBD. Once our approach is finalized we may need identifiers for the
   various TLVs and sub-TLVs.




Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 24]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


7. Acknowledgments

   This document was prepared using 2-Word-v2.0.template.dot.














































Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 25]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009




8. References

8.1. Normative References

   [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
             Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC2863] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group
             MIB", RFC 2863, June 2000.

   [RFC3471] Berger, L., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
             (GMPLS) Signaling Functional Description", RFC 3471,
             January 2003.

   [G.694.1] ITU-T Recommendation G.694.1, "Spectral grids for WDM
             applications: DWDM frequency grid", June, 2002.

   [RFC4202] Kompella, K., Ed., and Y. Rekhter, Ed., "Routing Extensions
             in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
             (GMPLS)", RFC 4202, October 2005

   [RFC4203] Kompella, K., Ed., and Y. Rekhter, Ed., "OSPF Extensions in
             Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
             (GMPLS)", RFC 4203, October 2005.

   [Otani]   T. Otani, H. Guo, K. Miyazaki, D. Caviglia, "Generalized
             Labels for G.694 Lambda-Switching Capable Label Switching
             Routers", work in progress: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g-694-
             lambda-labels-03.txt.



8.2. Informative References

   [G.694.1] ITU-T Recommendation G.694.1, Spectral grids for WDM
             applications: DWDM frequency grid, June 2002.

   [G.694.2] ITU-T Recommendation G.694.2, Spectral grids for WDM
             applications: CWDM wavelength grid, December 2003.

   [RFC5307] Kompella, K., Ed., and Y. Rekhter, Ed., "IS-IS Extensions
             in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
             (GMPLS)", RFC 5307, October 2008.




Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 26]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009




   [Switch] G. Bernstein, Y. Lee, A. Gavler, J. Martensson, " Modeling
         WDM Wavelength Switching Systems for use in Automated Path
         Computation", http://www.grotto-
         networking.com/wson/ModelingWSONswitchesV2a.pdf , June, 2008

   [WSON-Frame] Y. Lee, G. Bernstein, W. Imajuku, "Framework for GMPLS
             and PCE Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks",
             work in progress: draft-ietf-ccamp-wavelength-switched-
             framework-01.txt, July 2008.

   [WSON-Info] G. Bernstein, Y. Lee, D. Li, W. Imajuku, "Routing and
             Wavelength Assignment Information Model for Wavelength
             Switched Optical Networks", work in progress: draft-ietf-
             ccamp-rwa-info-01.txt, October 2008.

   [PCEP]    Vasseur, JP., Ed. and JL. Le Roux, Ed., "Path Computation
             Element (PCE) communication Protocol (PCEP) - Version 1",
             draft-ietf-pce-pcep, work in progress.





























Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 27]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


9. Contributors

   Diego Caviglia
   Ericsson
   Via A. Negrone 1/A 16153
   Genoa Italy

   Phone: +39 010 600 3736
   Email: diego.caviglia@(marconi.com, ericsson.com)

   Anders Gavler
   Acreo AB
   Electrum 236
   SE - 164 40 Kista Sweden

   Email: Anders.Gavler@acreo.se

   Jonas Martensson
   Acreo AB
   Electrum 236
   SE - 164 40 Kista, Sweden

   Email: Jonas.Martensson@acreo.se

   Itaru Nishioka
   NEC Corp.
   1753 Simonumabe, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 211-8666
   Japan

   Phone: +81 44 396 3287
   Email: i-nishioka@cb.jp.nec.com



Authors' Addresses

   Greg M. Bernstein (ed.)
   Grotto Networking
   Fremont California, USA

   Phone: (510) 573-2237
   Email: gregb@grotto-networking.com







Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 28]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


   Young Lee (ed.)
   Huawei Technologies
   1700 Alma Drive, Suite 100
   Plano, TX 75075
   USA

   Phone: (972) 509-5599 (x2240)
   Email: ylee@huawei.com


   Dan Li
   Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
   F3-5-B R&D Center, Huawei Base,
   Bantian, Longgang District
   Shenzhen 518129 P.R.China

   Phone: +86-755-28973237
   Email: danli@huawei.com

   Wataru Imajuku
   NTT Network Innovation Labs
   1-1 Hikari-no-oka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa
   Japan

   Phone: +81-(46) 859-4315
   Email: imajuku.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp



   Jianrui Han
   Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
   F3-5-B R&D Center, Huawei Base,
   Bantian, Longgang District
   Shenzhen 518129 P.R.China

   Phone: +86-755-28972916
   Email: hanjianrui@huawei.com


Intellectual Property Statement

   The IETF Trust takes no position regarding the validity or scope of
   any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be
   claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology
   described in any IETF Document or the extent to which any license
   under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it



Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 29]


Internet-Draft   Wavelength Switched Optical Networks        March 2009


   represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any
   such rights.

   Copies of Intellectual Property disclosures made to the IETF
   Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or
   the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or
   permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or
   users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR
   repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   any standard or specification contained in an IETF Document. Please
   address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Disclaimer of Validity

   All IETF Documents and the information contained therein are provided
   on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE
   REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE
   IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL
   WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY
   WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION THEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE
   ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS
   FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgment

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.


















Bernstein and Lee     Expires September 3, 2009               [Page 30]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129d, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/