[Docs] [txt|pdf|xml|html] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: (draft-nottingham-proxy-status) 00 01

HTTP                                                       M. Nottingham
Internet-Draft                                                    Fastly
Intended status: Standards Track                               P. Sikora
Expires: September 2, 2020                                        Google
                                                           March 1, 2020


              The Proxy-Status HTTP Response Header Field
                   draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-01

Abstract

   This document defines the Proxy-Status HTTP header field to convey
   the details of intermediary handling of responses, including
   generated errors.

Note to Readers

   _RFC EDITOR: please remove this section before publication_

   Discussion of this draft takes place on the HTTP working group
   mailing list (ietf-http-wg@w3.org), which is archived at
   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/ [1].

   Working Group information can be found at https://httpwg.org/ [2];
   source code and issues list for this draft can be found at
   https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/labels/proxy-status [3].

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on September 2, 2020.







Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020               [Page 1]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     1.1.  Notational Conventions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   2.  The Proxy-Status HTTP Header Field  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.1.  Proxy-Status Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
       2.1.1.  origin  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
       2.1.2.  fwd-protocol  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
       2.1.3.  error . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
       2.1.4.  details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     2.2.  Proxy Error Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
       2.2.1.  DNS Timeout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
       2.2.2.  DNS Error . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
       2.2.3.  Destination Not Found . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
       2.2.4.  Destination Unavailable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       2.2.5.  Destination IP Prohibited . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       2.2.6.  Destination IP Unroutable . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       2.2.7.  Connection Refused  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       2.2.8.  Connection Terminated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
       2.2.9.  Connection Timeout  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
       2.2.10. Connection Read Timeout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
       2.2.11. Connection Write Timeout  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
       2.2.12. Connection Limit Reached  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
       2.2.13. HTTP Incomplete Response  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
       2.2.14. HTTP Protocol Error . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
       2.2.15. HTTP Response Header Block Too Large  . . . . . . . .  10
       2.2.16. HTTP Response Header Too Large  . . . . . . . . . . .  11
       2.2.17. HTTP Response Body Too Large  . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
       2.2.18. HTTP Response Transfer-Coding Error . . . . . . . . .  11
       2.2.19. HTTP Response Content-Coding Error  . . . . . . . . .  12
       2.2.20. HTTP Response Timeout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
       2.2.21. TLS Handshake Error . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
       2.2.22. TLS Untrusted Peer Certificate  . . . . . . . . . . .  12



Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020               [Page 2]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


       2.2.23. TLS Expired Peer Certificate  . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
       2.2.24. TLS Unexpected Peer Certificate . . . . . . . . . . .  13
       2.2.25. TLS Missing Proxy Certificate . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
       2.2.26. TLS Rejected Proxy Certificate  . . . . . . . . . . .  14
       2.2.27. TLS Error . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
       2.2.28. HTTP Request Error  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
       2.2.29. HTTP Request Denied . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
       2.2.30. HTTP Upgrade Failed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
       2.2.31. Proxy Internal Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
       2.2.32. Proxy Internal Error  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
       2.2.33. Proxy Loop Detected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     2.3.  Defining New Proxy Error Types  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
   3.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
   5.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
     5.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
     5.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
     5.3.  URIs  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18

1.  Introduction

   HTTP intermediaries - including both forward proxies and gateways
   (also known as "reverse proxies") - have become an increasingly
   significant part of HTTP deployments.  In particular, reverse proxies
   and Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) form part of the critical
   infrastructure of many Web sites.

   Typically, HTTP intermediaries forward requests towards the origin
   server and then forward their responses back to clients.  However, if
   an error occurs, the response is generated by the intermediary
   itself.

   HTTP accommodates these types of errors with a few status codes; for
   example, 502 Bad Gateway and 504 Gateway Timeout.  However,
   experience has shown that more information is necessary to aid
   debugging and communicate what's happened to the client.

   Additionally, intermediaries sometimes want to convey additional
   information about their handling of a response, even if they did not
   generate it.

   To enable these uses, Section 2 defines a new HTTP response header
   field to allow intermediaries to convey details of their handling of
   a response, and Section 2.2 defines a set of Proxy Error Types for
   use when a proxy generates the response.  Section 2.3 explains how to
   define new Proxy Error Types.




Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020               [Page 3]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


1.1.  Notational Conventions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

   This specification uses Structured Headers
   [I-D.ietf-httpbis-header-structure] to specify syntax.  The terms sh-
   param-list, sh-item, sh-string, sh-token and sh-integer refer to the
   structured types defined therein.

   Note that in this specification, "proxy" is used to indicate both
   forward and reverse proxies, otherwise known as gateways.  "Next hop"
   indicates the connection in the direction leading to the origin
   server for the request.

2.  The Proxy-Status HTTP Header Field

   The Proxy-Status HTTP response header field allows an intermediary to
   convey additional information about its handling of a response and
   its associated request.

   It is a Structured Headers [I-D.ietf-httpbis-header-structure] List
   of parameterised Tokens:

   Cache-Status   = sh-list

   Each member of the list represents an intermediary that has handled
   the response.  The first member of the list represents the
   intermediary closest to the origin server, and the last member of the
   list represents the intermediary closest to the user agent.

   For example:

   Proxy-Status: FooProxy, ExampleCDN

   indicates that this response was handled first by FooAccelerator and
   then ExampleCDN.

   Parameters on each member convey additional information about that
   intermediary's handling of the response; see Section 2.1 for defined
   parameters.

   Intermediaries determine when it is appropriate to add the Proxy-
   Status header field to a response.  Some might decide to add it to
   all responses, whereas others might only do so when specifically



Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020               [Page 4]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


   configured to, or when the request contains a header that activates a
   debugging mode.

   When adding a value to the Proxy-Status header field, intermediaries
   SHOULD preserve the existing contents of the header, to allow
   debugging of the entire chain of intermediaries handling the request.

   The list members identify the intermediary that inserted the value,
   and MUST have a type of either sh-string or sh-token.  Depending on
   the deployment, this might be a product or service name (e.g.,
   ExampleProxy or "Example CDN"), a hostname ("proxy-3.example.com"),
   and IP address, or a generated string.

   Each member of the list can also have a number of parameters that
   describe that intermediary's handling of the request.  While all of
   these parameters are OPTIONAL, intermediaries are encouraged to
   provide as much information as possible.

   Proxy-Status MAY be sent in HTTP trailers, but - as with all trailers
   - it might be silently discarded along the path to the user agent, so
   this SHOULD NOT be done unless it is not possible to send it in
   headers.  For example, if an intermediary is streaming a response and
   the upstream connection suddenly terminates, Proxy-Status can be
   appended to the trailers of the outgoing message (since the headers
   have already been sent).

   Note that there are various security considerations for
   intermediaries using the Proxy-Status header field; see Section 4.

   Origin servers MUST NOT generate the Proxy-Status header field.

2.1.  Proxy-Status Parameters

   This section lists parameters that can be used on the members of
   Proxy-Status.

2.1.1.  origin

   The "origin" parameter's value is a sh-string or sh-token that
   identifies the origin server selected (and used, if contacted) for
   this response.  Its contents might be a hostname, IP address, or
   alias.

   This is most useful for gateways (also known as "reverse proxies"),
   since they are often configured to use an origin server other than
   that which appears in the URL, and sometimes they use several origins
   to serve a given site.




Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020               [Page 5]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


   For example:

   Proxy-Status: cdn.example.org; origin=backend.example.org

2.1.2.  fwd-protocol

   The "fwd-protocol" parameter's value is a sh-token indicating the
   ALPN protocol identifier [RFC7301] used by the intermediary to
   connect to the next hop.  This is only applicable when that
   connection was actually established.

   For example:

   Proxy-Status: "proxy.example.org"; fwd-protocol=h2

2.1.3.  error

   The "error" parameter's value is a sh-token that is a Proxy Error
   Type.  When present, it indicates that the response was generated by
   the proxy, not the origin server or any other upstream server.

   Section 2.2 lists the Proxy Error Types defined in this document; new
   ones can be defined using the procedure outlined in Section 2.3.

   For example:

   HTTP/1.1 504 Gateway Timeout
   Proxy-Status: SomeCDN; error=connection_timeout

   indicates that this 504 response was generated by SomeCDN, due to a
   connection timeout when going forward.

   Or:

   HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
   Proxy-Status: SomeReverseProxy; error=http_request_error

   indicates that this 429 Too Many Requests response was generated by
   the intermediary, not the origin.

   Each Proxy Error Type has a Recommended HTTP Status Code.  When
   generating a HTTP response containing "error", its HTTP status code
   SHOULD be set to the Recommended HTTP Status Code.  However, there
   may be circumstances (e.g., for backwards compatibility with previous
   behaviours) when another status code might be used.






Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020               [Page 6]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


2.1.4.  details

   The "details" parameter's value is a sh-string containing additional
   information not captured anywhere else.  This can include
   implementation-specific or deployment-specific information.

   For example:

  Proxy-Status: ExampleProxy; error="http_protocol_error";
                details="Malformed response header - space before colon"

2.2.  Proxy Error Types

   This section lists the Proxy Error Types defined by this document.
   See Section 2.3 for information about defining new Proxy Error Types.

2.2.1.  DNS Timeout

   o  Name: dns_timeout

   o  Description: The intermediary encountered a timeout when trying to
      find an IP address for the next hop hostname.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 504

2.2.2.  DNS Error

   o  Name: dns_error

   o  Description: The intermediary encountered a DNS error when trying
      to find an IP address for the next hop hostname.

   o  Extra Parameters:

      *  rcode: A sh-string conveying the DNS RCODE that indicates the
         error type.  See [RFC8499], Section 3.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.3.  Destination Not Found

   o  Name: destination_not_found

   o  Description: The intermediary cannot determine the appropriate
      next hop to use for this request; for example, it may not be
      configured.  Note that this error is specific to gateways, which



Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020               [Page 7]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


      typically require specific configuration to identify the "backend"
      server; forward proxies use in-band information to identify the
      origin server.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 500

2.2.4.  Destination Unavailable

   o  Name: destination_unavailable

   o  Description: The intermediary considers the next hop to be
      unavailable; e.g., recent attempts to communicate with it may have
      failed, or a health check may indicate that it is down.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 503

2.2.5.  Destination IP Prohibited

   o  Name: destination_ip_prohibited

   o  Description: The intermediary is configured to prohibit
      connections to the next hop IP address.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.6.  Destination IP Unroutable

   o  Name: destination_ip_unroutable

   o  Description: The intermediary cannot find a route to the next hop
      IP address.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.7.  Connection Refused

   o  Name: connection_refused

   o  Description: The intermediary's connection to the next hop was
      refused.



Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020               [Page 8]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.8.  Connection Terminated

   o  Name: connection_terminated

   o  Description: The intermediary's connection to the next hop was
      closed before any part of the response was received.  If some part
      was received, see http_response_incomplete.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.9.  Connection Timeout

   o  Name: connection_timeout

   o  Description: The intermediary's attempt to open a connection to
      the next hop timed out.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 504

2.2.10.  Connection Read Timeout

   o  Name: connection_read_timeout

   o  Description: The intermediary was expecting data on a connection
      (e.g., part of a response), but did not receive any new data in a
      configured time limit.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 504

2.2.11.  Connection Write Timeout

   o  Name: connection_write_timeout

   o  Description: The intermediary was attempting to write data to a
      connection, but was not able to (e.g., because its buffers were
      full).

   o  Extra Parameters: None.



Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020               [Page 9]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 504

2.2.12.  Connection Limit Reached

   o  Name: connnection_limit_reached

   o  Description: The intermediary is configured to limit the number of
      connections it has to the next hop, and that limit has been
      passed.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 503

2.2.13.  HTTP Incomplete Response

   o  Name: http_response_incomplete

   o  Description: The intermediary received an incomplete response to
      the request from the next hop.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.14.  HTTP Protocol Error

   o  Name: http_protocol_error

   o  Description: The intermediary encountered a HTTP protocol error
      when communicating with the next hop.  This error should only be
      used when a more specific one is not defined.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.15.  HTTP Response Header Block Too Large

   o  Name: http_response_header_block_size

   o  Description: The intermediary received a response to the request
      whose header block was considered too large.

   o  Extra Parameters:

      *  header_block_size: a sh-integer indicating how large the
         headers received were.  Note that they might not be complete;



Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020              [Page 10]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


         i.e., the intermediary may have discarded or refused additional
         data.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.16.  HTTP Response Header Too Large

   o  Name: http_response_header_size

   o  Description: The intermediary received a response to the request
      containing an individual header line that was considered too
      large.

   o  Extra Parameters:

      *  header_name: a sh-string indicating the name of the header that
         triggered the error.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.17.  HTTP Response Body Too Large

   o  Name: http_response_body_size

   o  Description: The intermediary received a response to the request
      whose body was considered too large.

   o  Extra Parameters:

      *  body_size: a sh-integer indicating how large the body received
         was.  Note that it may not have been complete; i.e., the
         intermediary may have discarded or refused additional data.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.18.  HTTP Response Transfer-Coding Error

   o  Name: http_response_transfer_coding

   o  Description: The intermediary encountered an error decoding the
      transfer-coding of the response.

   o  Extra Parameters:

      *  coding: a sh-token containing the specific coding that caused
         the error.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502



Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020              [Page 11]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


2.2.19.  HTTP Response Content-Coding Error

   o  Name: http_response_content_coding

   o  Description: The intermediary encountered an error decoding the
      content-coding of the response.

   o  Extra Parameters:

      *  coding: a sh-token containing the specific coding that caused
         the error.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.20.  HTTP Response Timeout

   o  Name: http_response_timeout

   o  Description: The intermediary reached a configured time limit
      waiting for the complete response.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 504

2.2.21.  TLS Handshake Error

   o  Name: tls_handshake_error

   o  Description: The intermediary encountered an error during TLS
      handshake with the next hop.

   o  Extra Parameters:

      *  alert_message: a sh-token containing the applicable description
         string from the TLS Alerts registry.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.22.  TLS Untrusted Peer Certificate

   o  Name: tls_untrusted_peer_certificate

   o  Description: The intermediary received an untrusted peer
      certificate during TLS handshake with the next hop.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.




Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020              [Page 12]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.23.  TLS Expired Peer Certificate

   o  Name: tls_expired_peer_certificate

   o  Description: The intermediary received an expired peer certificate
      during TLS handshake with the next hop.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.24.  TLS Unexpected Peer Certificate

   o  Name: tls_unexpected_peer_certificate

   o  Description: The intermediary received an unexpected peer
      certificate (e.g., SPKI doesn't match) during the TLS handshake
      with the next hop.

   o  Extra Parameters:

      *  identity: a sh-string containing a comma-separated list of
         Subject Alternative Names from the certificate received from
         the next hop.

      *  sha256: a sh-string containing the hex-encoded SHA-256 of the
         certificate received from the next hop.

      *  spki: a sh-string containing the base64-encoded SHA-256 of the
         Subject Public Key Info (SPKI) from the certificate received
         from the next hop.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.25.  TLS Missing Proxy Certificate

   o  Name: tls_missing_proxy_certificate

   o  Description: The next hop requested a client certificate from the
      intermediary during TLS handshake, but it wasn't configured with
      one.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 500




Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020              [Page 13]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


2.2.26.  TLS Rejected Proxy Certificate

   o  Name: tls_rejected_proxy_certificate

   o  Description: The next hop rejected the client certificate provided
      by the intermediary during TLS handshake.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 500

2.2.27.  TLS Error

   o  Name: tls_error

   o  Description: The intermediary encountered a TLS error when
      communicating with the next hop.

   o  Extra Parameters:

      *  alert_message: a sh-token containing the applicable description
         string from the TLS Alerts registry.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.28.  HTTP Request Error

   o  Name: http_request_error

   o  Description: The intermediary is generating a client (4xx)
      response on the origin's behalf.  Applicable status codes include
      (but are not limited to) 400, 403, 405, 406, 408, 411, 413, 414,
      415, 416, 417, 429.

   o  Extra Parameters:

      *  status_code: a sh-integer containing the generated status code.

      *  status_phrase: a sh-string containing the generated status
         phrase.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: The applicable 4xx status code

   This type helps distinguish between responses generated by
   intermediaries from those generated by the origin.






Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020              [Page 14]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


2.2.29.  HTTP Request Denied

   o  Name: http_request_denied

   o  Description: The intermediary rejected the HTTP request based on
      its configuration and/or policy settings.  The request wasn't
      forwarded to the next hop.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 400

2.2.30.  HTTP Upgrade Failed

   o  Name: http_upgrade_failed

   o  Description: The HTTP Upgrade between the intermediary and the
      next hop failed.

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.2.31.  Proxy Internal Response

   o  Name: proxy_internal_response

   o  Description: The intermediary generated the response locally,
      without attempting to connect to the next hop (e.g. in response to
      a request to a debug endpoint terminated at the intermediary).

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code:

2.2.32.  Proxy Internal Error

   o  Name: proxy_internal_error

   o  Description: The intermediary encountered an internal error
      unrelated to the origin.

   o  Extra Parameters:

      *  error: a sh-string containing details about the error
         condition.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 500



Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020              [Page 15]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


2.2.33.  Proxy Loop Detected

   o  Name: proxy_loop_detected

   o  Description: The intermediary tried to forward the request to
      itself, or a loop has been detected using different means (e.g.
      [RFC8586]).

   o  Extra Parameters: None.

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: 502

2.3.  Defining New Proxy Error Types

   New Proxy Error Types can be defined by registering them in the HTTP
   Proxy Error Types registry.

   Registration requests are reviewed and approved by a Designated
   Expert, as per [RFC8126], Section 4.5.  A specification document is
   appreciated, but not required.

   The Expert(s) should consider the following factors when evaluating
   requests:

   o  Community feedback

   o  If the value is sufficiently well-defined

   o  If the value is generic; vendor-specific, application-specific and
      deployment-specific values are discouraged

   Registration requests should use the following template:

   o  Name: [a name for the Proxy Error Type that is matches sh-token]

   o  Description: [a description of the conditions that generate the
      Proxy Error Type]

   o  Extra Parameters: [zero or more optional parameters, along with
      their allowable type(s)]

   o  Recommended HTTP status code: [the appropriate HTTP status code
      for this entry]

   See the registry at https://iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-statuses
   [4] for details on where to send registration requests.





Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020              [Page 16]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


3.  IANA Considerations

   Upon publication, please create the HTTP Proxy Error Types registry
   at https://iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-statuses [5] and populate
   it with the types defined in Section 2.2; see Section 2.3 for its
   associated procedures.

4.  Security Considerations

   One of the primary security concerns when using Proxy-Status is
   leaking information that might aid an attacker.  For example,
   information about the intermediary's configuration and back-end
   topology can be exposed.

   As a result, care needs to be taken when deciding to generate a
   Proxy-Status header.  Note that intermediaries are not required to
   generate a Proxy-Status header field in any response, and can
   conditionally generate them based upon request attributes (e.g.,
   authentication tokens, IP address).

   Likewise, generation of all parameters is optional.

5.  References

5.1.  Normative References

   [I-D.ietf-httpbis-header-structure]
              Nottingham, M. and P. Kamp, "Structured Headers for HTTP",
              draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-13 (work in progress),
              August 2019.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC7301]  Friedl, S., Popov, A., Langley, A., and E. Stephan,
              "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Application-Layer Protocol
              Negotiation Extension", RFC 7301, DOI 10.17487/RFC7301,
              July 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7301>.

   [RFC8126]  Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
              Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
              RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.






Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020              [Page 17]


Internet-Draft                Proxy-Status                    March 2020


   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

   [RFC8499]  Hoffman, P., Sullivan, A., and K. Fujiwara, "DNS
              Terminology", BCP 219, RFC 8499, DOI 10.17487/RFC8499,
              January 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8499>.

5.2.  Informative References

   [RFC8586]  Ludin, S., Nottingham, M., and N. Sullivan, "Loop
              Detection in Content Delivery Networks (CDNs)", RFC 8586,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8586, April 2019,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8586>.

5.3.  URIs

   [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/

   [2] https://httpwg.org/

   [3] https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/labels/proxy-status

   [4] https://iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-statuses

   [5] https://iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-statuses

Authors' Addresses

   Mark Nottingham
   Fastly

   Email: mnot@mnot.net
   URI:   https://www.mnot.net/


   Piotr Sikora
   Google

   Email: piotrsikora@google.com











Nottingham & Sikora     Expires September 2, 2020              [Page 18]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129d, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/