[Docs] [txt|pdf|xml|html] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: (RFC 2031) 00 01 02 03 04

IETF Administrative Support Activity 2                      G. Camarillo
Internet-Draft                                                  Ericsson
Obsoletes: 2031 (if approved)                               J. Livingood
Intended status: Informational                                   Comcast
Expires: August 18, 2019                               February 14, 2019


                       The IETF-ISOC Relationship
                     draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc2031bis-04

Abstract

   This document summarises the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) -
   Internet Society (ISOC) relationship, following a major revision to
   the structure of the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA) in
   2018.  The IASA was revised under a new "IASA 2.0" structure by the
   IASA2 Working Group, which changed the IETF's administrative, legal,
   and financial structure.  As a result, it also changed the
   relationship between the IETF and ISOC, which made it necessary to
   revise RFC 2031.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 18, 2019.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect



Camarillo & Livingood    Expires August 18, 2019                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft         The IETF-ISOC Relationship          February 2019


   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction and History  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Philosophical Relationship with ISOC  . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Main Division of Responsibilities between IETF and ISOC . . .   3
   4.  ISOC's Role in the IETF Standards Process . . . . . . . . . .   4
   5.  The IETF's Role in ISOC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   6.  Legal Relationship with ISOC  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   7.  Financial and Administrative Relationship with ISOC . . . . .   6
   8.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   9.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   10. Privacy Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   11. Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   12. Changes from Previous Versions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   13. Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9

1.  Introduction and History

   The Internet Society provides a corporate home for the administrative
   entity that supports the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), the
   Internet Architecture Board (IAB), and the Internet Research Task
   Force (IRTF), and supports the work of these groups through a variety
   of programs.

   The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is the body that is
   responsible for the development and maintenance of the Internet
   Standards.  The IETF is primarily a volunteer organization.  Its
   driving force is a group of dedicated high-quality engineers from all
   over the world.  In a structure of working groups, these engineers
   exchange ideas and experience, and through discussion and
   collaboration (both electronically and face-to-face) they strive to
   achieve rough consensus and implement the standards through running
   code.

   The growth of the Internet over several decades also led to the
   growth of the IETF.  More and more people, organizations, and
   companies rely on Internet Standards.  Non-technical issues, such as
   legal, administrative, and financial issues had long been an
   undesirable but unavoidable part of the IETF.  To address these
   issues in 1995 the IETF established the Poised95 Working Group.  Its
   goal was to structure and document the IETF processes in order to
   maximize the flexibility and freedom of IETF engineers so that they



Camarillo & Livingood    Expires August 18, 2019                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft         The IETF-ISOC Relationship          February 2019


   could work in the way the IETF had always been most successful and to
   honour the IETF credo: "Rough consensus and running code".

   The Poised95 Working Group concluded that the Internet Society
   (ISOC), which was formed in 1992, was the best organization to handle
   all of these legal, administrative, and financial tasks on behalf of
   and in close cooperation with the IETF.  This led to documenting
   things such as the IETF standards process [RFC2026], the IETF
   organizational structure [RFC2028], the IETF Nominating Committee
   (NomCom) procedures [RFC2282], and the IETF-ISOC relationship
   [RFC2031].

   As time passed and operational experience accumulated, additional
   structure was necessary.  As a result, the Internet Administrative
   Support Activity (IASA) was defined in 2005 and documented in
   [RFC4071] and [RFC4371].

   In 2018, the IASA was revised under a new "IASA 2.0" structure by the
   IASA2 Working Group, which made significant revisions to the IETF's
   administrative, legal, and financial structure.  One critical outcome
   was the formation, in close cooperation between the IETF and ISOC, of
   the IETF Administration Limited Liability Company (IETF LLC) as a
   subsidiary of ISOC.

   As a result of the the IASA 2.0 structure [I-D.ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis]
   and formation of the IETF LLC, the relationship between the IETF and
   ISOC has changed.  This document summarises the current state of the
   IETF - ISOC relationship at a high level and replaces [RFC2031].

2.  Philosophical Relationship with ISOC

   ISOC and the IETF have historically been philosophically aligned.
   ISOC's connection with the IETF community has always played an
   important role in its policy work.  ISOC has always been an advocate
   for multistakeholder processes, which include the technical
   community.  Open standards are an explicit part of one of the focus
   areas in ISOC's mission: Advancing the development and application of
   Internet infrastructure, technologies, and open standards.

3.  Main Division of Responsibilities between IETF and ISOC

   The IETF remains responsible for the development and quality of the
   Internet Standards.  Apart from the roles described below, the IETF
   and ISOC acknowledge that ISOC has no influence whatsoever on the
   technical content of Internet Standards.






Camarillo & Livingood    Expires August 18, 2019                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft         The IETF-ISOC Relationship          February 2019


4.  ISOC's Role in the IETF Standards Process

   ISOC plays a small role in the IETF standards process.  In
   particular, ISOC assists the standards process by appointing the IETF
   NomCom chair and by confirming IAB candidates who are put forward by
   the IETF NomCom, as described in [RFC7437], and by acting as the last
   resort in the appeals process, as described in [RFC2026].

   ISOC maintains liaison relationships and memberships in other
   Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) and related organizations,
   which directly benefits the IETF.  For example, ISOC is a Sector
   Member of the ITU-T.  As a result, ISOC delegates are afforded the
   same rights as other ITU-T Sector Members [RFC6756].

   ISOC also supports the IETF standards process more indirectly (e.g.,
   by promoting it in relevant communities) through several programmes.
   For example, ISOC's Policymakers Programme to the IETF (usually
   referred to simply as ISOC's policy fellows programme) gives policy
   experts an opportunity to interact directly with the IETF technical
   community.  ISOC also performs technical work using the standards
   developed in the IETF as its basis.  An example of that is ISOC's
   Deploy360 program, which helps encourage and support the deployment
   of critical new IETF standards like DNSSEC [RFC4033] and IPv6
   [RFC8200].

   Otherwise, the involvement of ISOC's employees in the IETF standards
   process (e.g., as document editors or in leadership positions) is as
   individual contributors rather than on institutional grounds.

5.  The IETF's Role in ISOC

   The IETF plays a role in the governance of ISOC.  Per ISOC's by-laws,
   the IETF appoints a set of trustees to the ISOC Board.  The process
   by which the IETF makes those appointments is defined in [RFC3677].

   The charter of the IAB (Internet Architecture Board) [RFC2850] states
   that "the IAB acts as a source of advice and guidance to the Board of
   Trustees and Officers of the Internet Society concerning technical,
   architectural, procedural, and (where appropriate) policy matters
   pertaining to the Internet and its enabling technologies".  This
   connection between the IAB and ISOC ensures that ISOC's proposals in
   the policy area are based on a sound understanding of the relevant
   technologies and architectures.  ISOC's strong connection to the
   Internet technical community has always been one of its main
   strengths.






Camarillo & Livingood    Expires August 18, 2019                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft         The IETF-ISOC Relationship          February 2019


6.  Legal Relationship with ISOC

   The IETF LLC was created as a subsidiary of ISOC.  Specifically, the
   IETF LLC is a single-member Limited Liability Company created in
   Delaware (USA) in August 2018.  The member (i.e., its legal owner) is
   ISOC.  The IETF LLC is managed separately, makes a budget, can sign
   contracts, can pay and receive money, can sue and be sued, and has a
   board.  ISOC operates as a U.S. 501(c)(3) not-for-profit
   organization, and was founded to support and promote the development
   of the Internet as a global technical infrastructure, a resource to
   enrich people's lives, and a force for good in society.  The Limited
   Liability Company Agreement of IETF Administration LLC, dated August
   27 2018, is the Operating Agreement [OpAgreement] that governs the
   relationship between the IETF LLC and ISOC (while this document is
   intended as a summary of the agreement, please note that only the
   agreement is authoritative).

   The IETF LLC provides the IETF with a separate legal existence.  The
   IETF LLC structure now covers (from a legal perspective) the IETF
   standards and IETF standards process, all IETF officers (IAB, IESG,
   Nomcom, and WG chairs), IETF employees and contractors, the RFC
   series and RFC editor, and all of the IETF's other business
   operations.

   For tax purposes, the IETF LLC is considered a part of ISOC, known as
   a "disregarded entity".  This means that the IETF LLC shares ISOC's
   tax exempt status as a not-for-profit charity, and contributions to
   the LLC are tax deductible under U.S. law as they would be if they
   were made to ISOC.

   The IETF Trust, documented in [RFC5378], and updated in
   [I-D.ietf-iasa2-trust-rationale] and [I-D.ietf-iasa2-trust-update],
   provides legal protection for the RFC series of documents and other
   aspects of the IETF.  This includes things such as protection for
   trademarks, copyrights, and intellectual property rights.  As part of
   the IETF Trust arrangement, IETF standards documents can be freely
   downloaded, copied, and distributed without financial or other
   distribution restrictions, though all rights to change these
   documents lie with the IETF.  The IETF Trust also provides legal
   protection in case of disputes over intellectual property rights and
   other rights.  The creation of the IETF LLC has changed the way that
   the IETF Trust's trustees are selected but did not change the purpose
   or operation of the Trust.  One of the IETF Trust's trustees is
   appointed by the ISOC's board of trustees.







Camarillo & Livingood    Expires August 18, 2019                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft         The IETF-ISOC Relationship          February 2019


7.  Financial and Administrative Relationship with ISOC

   Under the terms of the Operating Agreement [OpAgreement] between ISOC
   and the IETF, ISOC has agreed to provide some funding support for the
   IETF (ISOC has historically provided the IETF with significant
   financial support).  In particular, among other things, the IETF LLC
   will be responsible for creating and managing an annual operating
   budget for the IETF; for negotiating, signing, and overseeing
   contracts; for fund raising; for maintaining a bank account; and for
   liability insurance.  The IETF LLC is managed by a board of
   directors, one of whom is appointed by the ISOC's board of trustees.
   The intention is that ISOC and the IETF LLC operate at arms length.

   The IETF LCC establishes contracts with third parties to provide
   different types of services to the IETF.  Note that it is possible
   that some of those services are provided by ISOC or involve ISOC
   staff.

   Under the new IASA 2.0 structure, the IETF is solely responsible for
   its administration via the IETF LLC, IETF Trust, IAB, IESG, IETF
   working groups, and other IETF processes.  A further exploration of
   this can be found in Section 4 of [I-D.ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis].

8.  IANA Considerations

   This document introduces no new IANA considerations.

9.  Security Considerations

   This document introduces no new security considerations.

10.  Privacy Considerations

   This document introduces no new privacy considerations.

11.  Acknowledgements

   The authors would like to thank Erik Huizer for his contribution as
   the author of [RFC2031], which this document replaces.

12.  Changes from Previous Versions

   RFC Editor: Please remove this section upon publication.

   -00: Initial version published

   -01: Several key updates to prepare WGLC based on WG feedback




Camarillo & Livingood    Expires August 18, 2019                [Page 6]


Internet-Draft         The IETF-ISOC Relationship          February 2019


   -02: Fixed nits identified by Brian Carpenter on 12-21-2018, and text
   on the tax status from John Levine.

   -03: As we entered IESG review, added a short description of what
   ISOC does (in relation to the IETF) that can be used in external
   material by both the IETF and ISOC.

   -04: Clarification adding text to Section 6 on legal issue.

13.  Informative References

   [I-D.ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis]
              Haberman, B., Hall, J., and J. Livingood, "Structure of
              the IETF Administrative Support Activity, Version 2.0",
              draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-04 (work in progress), January
              2019.

   [I-D.ietf-iasa2-trust-rationale]
              Arkko, J., "Discussion of the IASA 2.0 Changes as They
              Relate to the IETF Trust", draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-
              rationale-03 (work in progress), October 2018.

   [I-D.ietf-iasa2-trust-update]
              Arkko, J. and T. Hardie, "Update to the Process for
              Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust", draft-ietf-
              iasa2-trust-update-03 (work in progress), February 2019.

   [OpAgreement]
              "Limited Liability Company Agreement of IETF
              Administration LLC", August 2018.

   [RFC2026]  Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
              3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, DOI 10.17487/RFC2026, October 1996,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2026>.

   [RFC2028]  Hovey, R. and S. Bradner, "The Organizations Involved in
              the IETF Standards Process", BCP 11, RFC 2028,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2028, October 1996,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2028>.

   [RFC2031]  Huizer, E., "IETF-ISOC relationship", RFC 2031,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2031, October 1996,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2031>.

   [RFC2282]  Galvin, J., "IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and
              Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall
              Committees", RFC 2282, DOI 10.17487/RFC2282, February
              1998, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2282>.



Camarillo & Livingood    Expires August 18, 2019                [Page 7]


Internet-Draft         The IETF-ISOC Relationship          February 2019


   [RFC2850]  Internet Architecture Board and B. Carpenter, Ed.,
              "Charter of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)",
              BCP 39, RFC 2850, DOI 10.17487/RFC2850, May 2000,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2850>.

   [RFC3677]  Daigle, L., Ed. and Internet Architecture Board, "IETF
              ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures", BCP 77,
              RFC 3677, DOI 10.17487/RFC3677, December 2003,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3677>.

   [RFC4033]  Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S.
              Rose, "DNS Security Introduction and Requirements",
              RFC 4033, DOI 10.17487/RFC4033, March 2005,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4033>.

   [RFC4071]  Austein, R., Ed. and B. Wijnen, Ed., "Structure of the
              IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA)", BCP 101,
              RFC 4071, DOI 10.17487/RFC4071, April 2005,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4071>.

   [RFC4371]  Carpenter, B., Ed. and L. Lynch, Ed., "BCP 101 Update for
              IPR Trust", BCP 101, RFC 4371, DOI 10.17487/RFC4371,
              January 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4371>.

   [RFC5378]  Bradner, S., Ed. and J. Contreras, Ed., "Rights
              Contributors Provide to the IETF Trust", BCP 78, RFC 5378,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5378, November 2008,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5378>.

   [RFC6756]  Trowbridge, S., Ed., Lear, E., Ed., Fishman, G., Ed., and
              S. Bradner, Ed., "Internet Engineering Task Force and
              International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication
              Standardization Sector Collaboration Guidelines",
              RFC 6756, DOI 10.17487/RFC6756, September 2012,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6756>.

   [RFC7437]  Kucherawy, M., Ed., "IAB, IESG, and IAOC Selection,
              Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the
              Nominating and Recall Committees", BCP 10, RFC 7437,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC7437, January 2015,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7437>.

   [RFC8200]  Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
              (IPv6) Specification", STD 86, RFC 8200,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8200, July 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8200>.





Camarillo & Livingood    Expires August 18, 2019                [Page 8]


Internet-Draft         The IETF-ISOC Relationship          February 2019


Authors' Addresses

   Gonzalo Camarillo
   Ericsson

   Email: Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com


   Jason Livingood
   Comcast

   Email: jason_livingood@comcast.com







































Camarillo & Livingood    Expires August 18, 2019                [Page 9]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129c, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/