[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits] [IPR]

Versions: (draft-svshah-interdomain-sla-exchange) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13

IDR                                                              S. Shah
Internet-Draft                                                  K. Patel
Intended status: Standards Track                           Cisco Systems
Expires: August 8, 2016                                         S. Bajaj
                                                         Juniper Network
                                                             L. Tomotaki
                                                                 Verizon
                                                            M. Boucadair
                                                                  Orange
                                                        February 5, 2016


                  Inter-domain SLA Exchange Attribute
                   draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-08.txt

Abstract

   Network administrators typically enforce Quality of Service (QoS)
   policies according to Service Level Agreement (SLA) with their
   providers.  The enforcement of such policies often relies upon
   vendor-specific configuration language.  Both learning of SLA, either
   thru SLA documents or via some other out-of-band method, and
   translating them to vendor specific configuration language is a
   complex, often manual, process and prone to errors.

   This document specifies an optional transitive attribute to signal
   SLA parameters in-band, across administrative boundaries (considered
   as Autonomous Systems (AS)), thus simplifying and facilitating some
   of the complex provisioning tasks in situations where BGP is
   available as a routing protocol.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 8, 2016.




Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                 [Page 1]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   3.  QoS Attribute Definition  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.1.  SLA, QoS attribute sub-type, Definition . . . . . . . . .   5
     3.2.  SLA SubType Value Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     3.3.  SLA-Content per Event Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       3.3.1.  Supported IPFIX values for Classifier Elements  . . .  12
       3.3.2.  Traffic Class Service TLVs  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   4.  Originating SLA Notification  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
     4.1.  SLA Contexts  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
       4.1.1.  SLA Advertisement for Point-to-Point Connection . . .  21
       4.1.2.  SLA Advertisement for Destination AS Multiple Hops
               Away  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  21
   5.  SLA Attribute Handling at Forwarding Nodes  . . . . . . . . .  22
     5.1.  BGP Node Capable of Processing QoS Attribute  . . . . . .  22
     5.2.  SLA Attribute Handling at Receiver  . . . . . . . . . . .  22
   6.  Error Handling  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  23
   7.  Traffic Class Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  23
   8.  Deployment Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  24
   9.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  25
   10. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  25
   11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  27
   12. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  27
     12.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  27
     12.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  28
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  29








Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                 [Page 2]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


1.  Introduction

   Typically there is a contractual Service Level Agreement (SLA) for
   QoS established between a customer and a provider or between
   providers [RFC7297].  This QoS SLA defines the nature of the various
   traffic classes and services needed within each traffic class.  The
   contract may include full line-rate or sub line-rate without
   additional traffic classes, or it may contain additional traffic
   classes and service definitions for those traffic classes.  Finer
   granular traffic classes may be based on some standard code points
   (e.g., based on DSCP (Differentiated Services Code Point)) or
   specific set of prefixes.

   Once the contractual QoS SLA is established, QoS SLA parameters are
   enforced in some or all participating devices by deriving those
   parameters into configuration information on respective devices.  The
   network administrator translates the QoS SLA to QoS policies using
   router (vendor) specific provisioning language.  In a multi-vendor
   network, translating SLAs into technology-specific and vendor-
   specific configuration requires the network administrator to consider
   specific configuration of each vendor.  There does not exist any
   standard protocol to translate SLA agreements into technical clauses
   and configurations and thus both the steps of out of band learning of
   negotiated SLA and provisioning them in a vendor specific language
   can be complex and error-prone.

   SLA parameters may have to be exchanged through organizational
   boundaries, thru SLA documents or via some other off-band method, to
   an administrator provisioning actual devices.

   For example, to provide voice services, the provider may negotiate
   QoS parameters (like min/max rates) for such traffic classified under
   the EF (Expedited Forwarding) codepoint in Diffserv-enabled [RFC2475]
   networks.  The Administrator at the CE (Customer Edge) not only will
   have to know that provider's service for voice traffic is EF-based
   but will also have to know how to implement DSCP EF classification
   rule along with Low Latency Service, and possibly min/max rate
   enforcement for the optimal use of bandwidth, as per vendor specific
   provisioning language.

   The Inter-domain exchange of QoS SLA exchange policy described in
   this document does not require any specific method for the provider
   in establishing SLAs.  It only requires that the provider wishes to
   send the QoS SLA policy via BGP UPDATE [RFC4271] messages from the
   provider to a set of receivers (BGP peers) who will enact the policy.
   In reaction to, a receiving router may translate that to relevant QoS
   policy definition on the device.




Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                 [Page 3]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


   This document defines a new optional transitive BGP QoS attribute
   which has as one of its sub-types the SLA policy.  The BGP speakers
   of the originating AS send the BGP Attribute for prefixes this QoS
   SLA Policy applies to in a BGP UPDATE message that will be
   distributed to a list of destination ASes.  The QoS SLA policy can be
   for inbound traffic to the advertising AS or outbound traffic from
   the advertising AS, or both.

   The SLA negotiation and assurance is outside the scope of this
   document.  In the future, other sub-types of the QoS Attribute may
   deal with QoS other than SLA Policy for traffic.

   Protocols and data models are being created to standardize setting
   routing configuration parameters within networks.  YANG data models
   [RFC6020] are being developed so that NETCONF ([RFC6241] or RESTConf
   ([I-D.ietf-netconf-restconf]) can set these standardized in
   configuration mechanisms.  For ephemeral state, the I2RS protocol is
   being developed to set ephemeral state.  While these protocol provide
   valid configuration within a domain or across domains, some providers
   desire to exchange QoS parameters in-band utilizing BGP peering
   relationships.  This is similar to the distribution of Flow
   Specification information via BGP peering relationships (see
   [RFC5575] and [RFC7674]).

2.  Terminology

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

3.  QoS Attribute Definition

   The QoS Attribute is an optional transitive attribute (TBD -
   attribute code to be assigned by IANA).  SLA is defined as one of the
   sub-types in the QoS attribute.  The QoS attribute is only applicable
   to the NLRIs advertised in the BGP UPDATE message this attribute is
   included in.














Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                 [Page 4]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |   Attr flag   | Attr type QoS |                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+                               |
       ~                                                               ~
       |                     QoS Attr length/Value                     |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+..........................

    Attribute flags
        highest order bit (bit 0) -
            MUST be set to 1, since this is an optional attribute

        2nd higher order bit (bit 1) -
            MUST be set to 1, since this is a transitive attribute


                        Figure 1 - QoS BGP attribute


3.1.  SLA, QoS attribute sub-type, Definition

   The value field of the QoS Attribute contains the following:

      QoS Attribute flags, and

      Tuple of (SLA sub-type, length, value).

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       | QoS Attr flags|      subType  |         subtype Length        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       ~                                                               ~
       |                        SubType-Value                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+.........................+

                   Figure 2 - Format of BGP QoS Attribute


   QoS Attr flags  1 octet.  All the bits are currently un-used.  The
      space is provided for future use.  All bits MUST be set to zero
      when sent.  The values (0x01-0xFF) are reserved, and MUST be
      ignored when received.

   SubType  1 octet field with the following values:

         0x00 = reserved



Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                 [Page 5]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


         0x01 = SLA

         0x02 - 0x0f = reserved for future use (Standards Action)

   SubType length  - 2 octet field with length of sub-type value.

   SubType Value  variable length field containing information about:
      sender and receiver(s), and SLA parameters described in
      Section 3.2.

3.2.  SLA SubType Value Field

   The format of SubType Value field is shown in Figure 3.



       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                    32-bit Source AS (Advertiser)              |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                  32-bit Destination AS count                  |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                variable list of destination AS                |
       ~                            ....                               ~
       |                            ....                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       | Event |             SLA id            |      SLA length       |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                  SLA-Content per SLA Event                    |
       ~                                                               ~
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

         Figure 3 - The format of SLA SubType of the BGP QoS attribute

   Source AS:   32-bit source AS number.  This is the AS that is
      advertising SLA

         0 = ignore Source and Destination AS list from this value field

         Note that AS = 0, used in message outside of QoS attribute, is
         illegal in normal BGP operations.  AS = 0 inside the QoS
         attribute may be used simply as a flag to indicate to the
         receiver to ignore Source and Destination AS list from inside
         the QoS attribute.





Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                 [Page 6]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


   Destination AS count:  32-bit destination AS count to take variable
      length AS list.  This count has no functional value when Source AS
      is 0.

         0 = QoS attribute is relevant to every receiver of the message

   Destination AS list:

         32-bit destination AS number

         ....

         .... [as many as AS count]

   SLA Event:

         4-bits with values

         0x0 = reserved

         0x1 = ADVERTISE

         0x2 to 0xf - Reserved for future use

   SLA Id:  A 16-bit field containing identifier which is unique in
      scope of source AS

         The significance of an SLA identifier is in the context of the
         source that is advertising SLA parameters.  The SLA identifier
         is not globally unique but it MUST be unique within the source
         AS (advertiser).

         If the advertised SLA id is different from earlier advertised
         one, for the same prefix, previous SLA content MUST be replaced
         with the new advertised one.

         The SLA ID applies aggregate for all the traffic to prefixes
         for a given AFI/SAFI that share same source AS and SLA id.

   SLA Length:  A 12-bit field indicating the length of SLA-Content.
      The SLA-content is optional for each advertised SLA id.  If the
      SLA-content field does not exist, the SLA length field value is
      zero.

   SLA-Content per SLA Event:  A variable length field (optional field).

         If SLA field exists, it follows the format described in
         Section 3.3.



Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                 [Page 7]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


         If the SLA-Content field does not exist in a BGP UPDATE message
         that contains the QoS attribute with an SLA Sub-type, then
         receiver MUST inherit the previously advertised SLA content for
         the same SLA id from the same Source AS.

         If there does not exist any prior SLA to relate to the
         advertised SLA id, then receiver can ignore the SLA
         advertisement and process the rest of the BGP message.

         The lack of a valid prior SLA-Content field does not make this
         attribute invalid, so the attribute MUST be forwarded as a
         valid BGP optional transitive attribute.

3.3.  SLA-Content per Event Field

   The only event described below is ADVERTISE.  The format of SLA-
   Content for the ADVERTISE event is shown in Figure 4.


































Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                 [Page 8]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |dir|       Traffic Class count     | Class Desc Len|           |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+           ~
       |                                                               |
       ~                  Traffic Class Description                    ~
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       | Elements Count|                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+                                               ~
       |                                                               |
       ~              Traffic Class Elements (TLVs)                    ~
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       | Service  Count|                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+                                               ~
       |               Traffic Class Service TLVs                      |
       ~                                                               ~
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                                                               |
       ~  Repeat from Traffic Class Description for next Traffic Class ~
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                                                               |
       ~    Repeat from direction for SLA in the other direction       ~
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                   Figure 4 - SLA-Content for event ADVERTISE

   SLA-content contains set of Traffic Class Elements (Classifiers) and
   Service TLVs for a list of Traffic Classes.  This list of Traffic
   Classes MUST be specified for one direction first and then optionally
   followed by for the opposite direction.

   dir (Direction):  2 bit field that indicates Direction of the SLA.
      The following values are defined:

         0x0 = reserved

         0x1 = incoming, to source AS from destination AS

         0x2 = outgoing, from source AS towards destination AS

         0x3 = for future use




Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                 [Page 9]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


   Traffic Class (Classifier Group) count:  16 bit field with the count
      of number of classifier groups.  The value of zero (0x00)in this
      field is a special value which invalidates previous advertised SLA
      (if any exist).

   Class Descr Len:  8 bit field that contains the length of the Traffic
      Class Description field.  The value of zero in this field
      indicates that no Traffic Class Description field follows.

   Traffic Class Description:  The description field MUST carry UTF-8
      encoded description.

   Elements (Classifier) Count:  8 bit field containing the count of
      traffic elements.  The value zero (0x00) means there are no
      elements in the traffic class, and thus the traffic class is to
      classify rest of the traffic not captured otherwise by other
      traffic classes in the set for a given direction.

         It is RECOMMENDED that Traffic Class that has 0 elements is
         present last in the advertised list of Traffic Classes.

         If an advertised message has it positioned somewhere else, then
         the receiver MUST re-order it, for the forwarding purpose, to
         the last position in the advertised list of Traffic Classes
         from a given source AS.

         The QoS attribute advertised from a specific source MUST NOT
         have more than one such Traffic Classes (Traffic Class with 0
         elements count).  If there are more than one such Traffic
         Classes present then it is an error condition which should
         follow handling of such BGP message as described in the Error
         handling section.

   Classifier Element TLVs:  (optional) variable length field containing
      as many TLVs specified by the Elements count field.  Each TLV has
      the following format:

         IPFIX Element Identifier: (8 bit type field) IPFIX Identifiers
         listed in Table 1.

         Size of Value field: (8 bit field) - Indicates the length of
         the value field.

         Value: A variable field containing a value appropriate for the
         IPFIX element.  It is an error if the IPFix field does not
         contain the appropriate format (see BGP error handling in
         section 6).  Only the IPFIX elements shown in Table 1 are
         supported.



Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 10]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


      Any Traffic Class element advertised in the QoS attribute only
      applies to the NLRI advertised (AFI/SAFIs) within the BGP UPDATE
      message the QoS attribute is contained in.  If a receiver receives
      a BGP UPDATE message with QoS/SLA attribute for an NLRI that it
      does not support then the receiver MUST NOT install that
      advertised SLA and continue to forward this attribute as an
      optional transitive attribute.

   Service Count:  8 bit count of Traffic Class Service TLVs following
      this count.  A value of zero is a special value indicating "no
      bounded service" (a.k.a., Best Effort (BE)).

   Traffic Class Service TLVs:  (optional) variable length field with
      the following format for the TLVs

         Traffic Class Service type: 16-bit field which specifies a
         service type.  Each service type is detailed in Section 3.3.2.
         The list of available service types are,

            0x00 = reserved

            0x01 = TRAFFIC_CLASS_TSPEC

            0x02 = L2_OVERHEAD

            0x03 = MINRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING

            0x04 = MINRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING

            0x05 = MAXRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING

            0x06 = MAXRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING

            0x07 = DROP_THRESHOLD

            0x08 = RELATIVE_PRIORITY

            0x09 = SUB_TRAFFIC_CLASSES

         Length of value field: 08-bit field that specifies the size of
         a value field to follow.

            TRAFFIC_CLASS_TSPEC type has a fixed size length of a value.
            It is 96 bits specifying Tspec described in Section 3.3.2.1.

            L2_OVERHEAD type has a fixed size length of a value.  It is
            8 bits as described in Section 3.3.2.2.




Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 11]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


            MINRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING type has a variable length value
            (see Section 3.3.2.3).

            MINRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING type has a variable length value
            (see Section 3.3.2.4).

            MAXRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING type has a variable length value
            (see Section 3.3.2.5).

            MAXRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING type has a variable length value
            (see Section 3.3.2.6).

            DROP_THRESHOLD type has a variable length value (see
            Section 3.3.2.8).

            RELATIVE_PRIORITY has a fixed size length of 4 bits
            specifying the priority value. (see Section 3.3.2.9).

            0x09 = SUB_TRAFFIC_CLASSES is a variable length field which
            allows sub-classes to be specified under traffic classes
            (see Section 3.3.2.10).

         Value field: field containing value appropriate for one of the
         Service Types.  It is an error if this field does not contain
         the appropriate format (see BGP error handling section for
         details).

3.3.1.  Supported IPFIX values for Classifier Elements

   IPFIX [RFC7012] has well defined identifier set for a large number of
   packet attributes; an IPFIX IANA registry maintains values for packet
   classifier attributes (https://www.ietf.org/assignments/ipfix").
   Only the IPFIX attributes listed in Table 1 are supported by BGP SLA
   exchange.  Any new attribute to be supported by SLA QOS MUST be added
   by a Standards Action.
















Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 12]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


          +----+----------------------------+
          | ID | Name                       |
          +----+----------------------------+
          |195 | ipDiffServCodePoint        |
          |203 | mplsTopLabelExp            |
          |244 | dot1qPriority              |
          |  8 | sourceIPv4Address          |
          | 27 | sourceIPv6Address          |
          |  9 | sourceIPv4PrefixLength     |
          | 29 | sourceIPv6PrefixLength     |
          | 44 | sourceIPv4Prefix           |
          |170 | sourceIPv6Prefix           |
          | 12 | destinationIPv4Address     |
          | 28 | destinationIPv6Address     |
          | 13 | destinationIPv4PrefixLength|
          | 30 | destinationIPv6PrefixLength|
          | 45 | destinationIPv4Prefix      |
          |169 | destinationIPv6Prefix      |
          |  4 | protocolIdentifier         |
          |  7 | sourceTransportPort        |
          | 11 | destinationTransportPort   |
          +----+----------------------------+

                       Table 1

3.3.2.  Traffic Class Service TLVs

3.3.2.1.  Traffic Class TSPEC TLV

   The TRAFFIC_CLASS_TSPEC TLV consists of:

      type = 0x01

      length = 96 bits (12 octets) TSpec field

      value = 96 bits, TRAFFIC_CLASS_TSPEC value consists of the (r),
      (b), (p) parameters as described in Invocation Information section
      of [RFC2212] and shown in Figure 5.  Note that inheriting the
      definition of TSpec here does not enable RFC2212 functionality.
      Only the values of the Traffic Specification are used in this
      specification.










Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 13]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |  Minimum Rate (r) (32-bit IEEE floating point number)         |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |  Burst Size (b) (32-bit IEEE floating point number)           |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |  Maximum Rate (p) (32-bit IEEE floating point number)         |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                        Figure 5 - Traffic Class TSPEC

   Format of Parameters (r), (b) and (p):  are 32-bit IEEE floating
      point numbers.  Positive infinity is represented as an IEEE single
      precision floating-point number with an exponent of all ones and a
      sign mantissa of all zeros.  The format of IEEE floating-point
      numbers is further summarized in [RFC4506].

   Parameter (r):  indicates min-rate of the traffic class.  This rate
      indicates the minimum rate, measured in octets of Layer 2 (L2)
      datagrams per second, that the service advertiser is providing for
      a given class of traffic on advertiser's hop.  Note that it does
      not necessarily translate to a minimum rate service to the
      receiver of an SLA unless the traffic class definition clearly
      represents a sole receiver of an SLA.  If there is no SLA for min-
      rate, the value of (r) MUST be set to 0.

   Parameter (b):  indicates maximum burst size, measured in octets of
      L2 datagram size.  Since queuing delay can be considered a
      function of burst size (b) and min-rate (r), in presence of non-
      zero parameter (r), parameter (b) represents bounded delay for the
      Traffic Class.  This delay is a single hop queuing delay when SLA
      is to be implemented at the resource constrained bottleneck.  In
      other words this burst size can be considered as a buffer size.
      Value of 0 for parameter (b) means the advertiser does not mandate
      specific bounded delay.

   Parameter (p):  indicates max-rate of the traffic class.  Just like
      min-rate, max-rate, measured in octets of L2 packets per second,
      field here also indicates service provided by advertiser.  If
      advertiser does not have any specific value to set for a given
      class of traffic, it MAY be set to physical interface line rate or
      any other indirect limit that may affect this class' maximum rate.
      In absence of any such known value, it MUST be set to positive
      infinity.  Value 0 is considered an error.






Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 14]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


3.3.2.2.  Traffic Class L2 Overhead

   The L2_OVERHEAD traffic class consists of:

      Type = 0x02 (L2_OVERHEAD)

      Length = 1 octet

      value = 8 bits, count of L2 overhead from sender in bytes

   By default the packet rate and other packet size related parameters
   advertised in an SLA include the L2 packet overhead.  For the
   receiver (of the SLA at next hop),this overhead is the L2 overhead of
   the local link where advertised SLA is received.

   However, in cases where advertised SLA is for a receiver multiple
   hops away, L2 overhead from the source perspective may be different
   from the local L2 overhead at the receiver.  In such cases, the
   explicit notification of size of L2 overhead from a sender is
   necessary for the a receiver to be able to know the L2 overhead
   required by the sender.  When the receiver chooses to react to an
   advertised SLA and if the L2 Overhead service type is present in
   advertised SLA, the receiver MUST use the explicit advertised L2
   overhead rather than the local L2 overhead.

   If SLA is required to consider only IP packet size, the sender MAY
   advertise this service with a value of 0.

3.3.2.3.  Traffic Class for MINRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING

   The MINRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING traffic class consists of:

      Type = 0x03 = MINRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING

      Length = 2 octets

      Value:

      Marking code-point type = 8 bits (1 octet) IPFIX Element
      Identifier.

      Marking code-point value = 8 bits (1 octet) code-point number.

   The marking code-point type of 0x00 is a drop identifier; the length
   in this case is zero.

   The following table lists the supported IPFIX Identifiers:




Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 15]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


          +----+----------------------------+
          | ID | Name                       |
          +----+----------------------------+
          |195 | ipDiffServCodePoint        |
          |203 | mplsTopLabelExp            |
          |244 | dot1qPriority              |
          +----+----------------------------+

                       Table 2

3.3.2.4.  Traffic Class for MINRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING

   The MINRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING traffic class consists of:

      Type = 0x04 = MINRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING

      Length = 2 octets

      Value:

      Marking code-point type = 8 bits (1 octet) IPFIX Element
      Identifier.

      Marking code-point value = 8 bits (1 octet) code-point number.

   The marking code-point type of 0x00 is a drop identifier; the length
   in this case is zero.

   The following table lists the supported IPFIX Identifiers:


          +----+----------------------------+
          | ID | Name                       |
          +----+----------------------------+
          |195 | ipDiffServCodePoint        |
          |203 | mplsTopLabelExp            |
          |244 | dot1qPriority              |
          +----+----------------------------+

                       Table 3

3.3.2.5.  Traffic Class for MAXRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING

   The MAXRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING traffic class consists of:

      Type = 0x05 = MAXRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING

      Length = 2 octets



Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 16]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


      Value:

      Marking code-point type = 8 bits (1 octet) IPFIX Element
      Identifier.

      Marking code-point value = 8 bits (1 octet) code-point number.

   The marking code-point type of 0x00 is a drop identifier; the length
   in this case is zero.

   The following table lists the supported IPFIX Identifiers:


          +----+----------------------------+
          | ID | Name                       |
          +----+----------------------------+
          |195 | ipDiffServCodePoint        |
          |203 | mplsTopLabelExp            |
          |244 | dot1qPriority              |
          +----+----------------------------+

                       Table 4

3.3.2.6.  Traffic Class for MAXRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING

   The MAXRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING traffic class consists of:

      Type = 0x06 = MAXRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING

      Length = 2 octets

      Value:

      Marking code-point type = 8 bits (1 octet) IPFIX Element
      Identifier.

      Marking code-point value = 8 bits (1 octet) code-point number.

   The marking code-point type of 0x00 is a drop identifier; the length
   in this case is zero.

   The following table lists the supported IPFIX Identifiers:









Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 17]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


          +----+----------------------------+
          | ID | Name                       |
          +----+----------------------------+
          |195 | ipDiffServCodePoint        |
          |203 | mplsTopLabelExp            |
          |244 | dot1qPriority              |
          +----+----------------------------+

                       Table 5

3.3.2.7.  Precedence between MINRATE and MAXRATE

   The precedence between MINRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING,
   MINRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING, MAXRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING, and
   MAXRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING when all four are advertised is:

   o  MINRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING takes highest precedence (that is over
      MAXRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING),

   o  MAXRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING takes precedence over
      MINRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING, and

   o  MAXRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING takes precedence over
      MINRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING

3.3.2.8.  Traffic Class for DROP_THRESHOLD

   The DROP_THRESHOLD traffic class consists of:

      Type = 0x07 - DROP_THRESHOLD

      Length = 1 octet that specifies total length of all set of drop
      thresholds.

      A set of drop threshold contains list of code-points of a specific
      type sharing a threshold in unit of bytes.  There MAY be more than
      one set of such threshold for this Service Type per Traffic Class.

      Value: number of set of thresholds and values in form of a sub-TLV
      for each set.

         Number of set of thresholds = 1 octet

         sub-TLV for each set: Each sub-TLV specifies a code-point type/
         values that the burst size is applicable to.  The sub-TLV is in
         the form of a (code-point type, value length, value) where
         value = list of code-points + burst size in unit of bytes
         applicable to that code-points.



Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 18]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


            sub-TLV code point type = 8 bits (1 octet) IPFIX Element
            Identifier from the list shown in Table 6.

            sub-TLV Length = 1 octet that specifies total length for set
            of code-points and burst size.

            sub-TLV Value: variable length field with

               sequence of code points - one code-point value specified
               in 1 octet.

               4 octets burst size - 32 bit (4 octets) IEEE Floating
               point number.


          +----+----------------------------+
          | ID | Name                       |
          +----+----------------------------+
          |195 | ipDiffServCodePoint        |
          |203 | mplsTopLabelExp            |
          |244 | dot1qPriority              |
          +----+----------------------------+

                       Table 6

3.3.2.9.  Traffic Class for Relative Priority

   The RELATIVE_PRIORITY traffic class consists of:

      Type = 0x08 - RELATIVE_PRIORITY

      Length = 4 bits

      Value:

      A value from range of 0 - 15.  Lower the value means higher the
      priority.

   Relative priority indicates scheduling priority of this traffic
   class.  Voice traffic, for example, which requires lowest latency
   compared to any other traffic, may have lowest value advertised in
   relative priority.  For two different traffic classification groups
   where one application group may be considered more important than the
   other but from a scheduling perspective does not require to be
   distinguished with a different priority, relative priority for those
   classification groups may be advertised with the same value.





Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 19]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


3.3.2.10.  Traffic Class for Sub-Traffic Classes

   The SUB_TRAFFIC_CLASSES traffic class consists of:

      Type = 0x09 - SUB_TRAFFIC_CLASSSES

      length = the combined length of a set of traffic Class TLVs
      included in a Sub-Traffic Classes grouping

      value = sequence of traffic class TLVs

   For SLAs where a specific Traffic Class may further have different
   sub-services for a sub-group of Classifier Elements, this service
   type SHOULD be used to further divide Traffic Class in multiple sub-
   classes.  Each sub-class is then defined with their own classifier
   elements and service types.

4.  Originating SLA Notification

   The QoS attribute MUST only be added by the originator and MUST NOT
   be added during BGP propagation.

   BGP UPDATE message with the QoS Attribute carrying SLA parameters
   SHOULD NOT be sent periodically just for the purpose of KEEPALIVE
   between two points.  Some sort of SLA policy change may be considered
   as a trigger for the advertisement.

   For any modified SLA parameters, the originator MUST re-advertise the
   entire set of SLA parameters.  There is no provision to advertise
   partial set of parameters.  To invalidate previously advertised SLA
   parameters, a message MUST be sent with the same SLA id for the same
   source with the Traffic Class count set to 0.

4.1.  SLA Contexts

   In certain cases, the advertisement of a QoS Attribute in a BGP
   UPDATE message may relate to an SLA for aggregate traffic over a
   point-to-point connection between a specific destination and a
   specific source.  A point-to-point connection may be the physical
   link, that connects two BGP peers, or may be a virtual link (e.g. a
   tunnel).  In such cases, a BGP update message with source AS number
   and NLRI prefix of source end-point can uniquely identify physical/
   virtual link in order to establish the context for the advertised
   SLA's for that point to point link.

   In the simplest case where provider (e.g., PE) and Customer (e.g.,
   CE) devices are directly connected via a physical link and have only




Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 20]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


   a single link between them, the CE can uniquely identify the
   forwarding link to PE with the following:

   o  AS number of the PE,

   o  NLRI prefix being an IP address of PE,

   o  next hop to CE (that is the next hop address from CE to PE).

   The SLA advertised in the QoS attribute in the BGP UPDATE message
   sent from the PE to a CE, along with the PE's AS number and IP
   address, establishes SLA context for the aggregate traffic through
   CE-to-PE link.

   The SLA advertised in the QoS attribute in the BGP UPDATE message
   from PE to CE, with PE's AS number and any other prefix establishes
   SLA for that specific prefix's traffic as a subset of traffic under
   CE-to-PE link.

   Even though this example is in the context of IP prefixes, QoS
   attribute's SLA exchange does not have to be limited to the IP
   address family (IPv4 and IPv6).  SLA advertisement is generic to all
   forms of NLRI types that are supported by the BGP specification (like
   IPv4, IPv6, VPN-IPv4, VPN-IPv6).

4.1.1.  SLA Advertisement for Point-to-Point Connection

   When BGP UPDATE message with the QoS Attribute with SLA is used to
   advertise the QoS SLA for a point-to-point connection (physical or
   logical), the next hop in the BGP message is used with the prefix of
   the source end-point of the point to point connection.

   The destination AS number in the QoS SLA attribute is typically set
   to the AS of the BGP peer's IP-Address.

   If the source AS number in the QoS SLA Attribute is set to zero, the
   source AS and Destination AS fields in the QoS SLA attribute are
   ignored.  This occurs if the BGP peer is sending an UPDATE message
   with the QOS SLA directly to a BGP peer (next-hop BGP peer).

4.1.2.  SLA Advertisement for Destination AS Multiple Hops Away

   When a BGP UPDATE message with a QoS SLA attribute is to be sent by a
   BGP peer beyond next hop peer, the value of source AS in the QoS
   attribute MUST be set by the originator of the UPDATE message.  If
   such an update is meant to be for a specific list of AS(es) as
   receivers, then the list of destination AS(es) MUST be explicitly




Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 21]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


   described in the QoS attribute message to avoid flooding of the QoS
   attribute data in the network beyond those destinations.

   If a new prefix is added in an AS for which SLA parameters have
   already been advertised before for other existing prefixes, and if
   traffic to this new prefix is subject to the same SLA advertised
   earlier, then the BGP UPDATE for this new prefix may include QoS
   attribute containing just an SLA id for an SLA id that was advertised
   earlier.  This BGP UPDATE message does not require to have the whole
   SLA content.  The SLA id is sufficient to relate SLA parameters to
   new advertised prefixes.

5.  SLA Attribute Handling at Forwarding Nodes

   The propagation of the QoS Attribute in the BGP UPDATE depends on the
   rules detailed in the following sub-sections for forwarding the QoS
   Attribute.

5.1.  BGP Node Capable of Processing QoS Attribute

   If a BGP peer is capable of processing a QoS attribute in a BGP
   UPDATE message, it MAY process the QoS attribute.  If UPDATE has a
   QoS Attribute with a list of destination ASes, it MAY trim the list
   and adjust the count of the destination AS to exclude ones that are
   not required in further announcement of BGP UPDATE messages.

   BGP peer MUST drop SLA related sub-type from the QoS attribute, if
   there are no more ASes from the QoS Attribute's destination list in
   the forwarding path.  The rest of the QoS attribute contents MAY be
   forwarded if there exist other sub-types of QoS attribute and
   forwarding rules meets other sub-types requirements.  If there is no
   other sub-types in the QoS attribute content then the node MUST drop
   the entire QoS attribute all together.  The other attributes and NLRI
   information MAY be announced further if they meet rules defined by
   other attributes and BGP specification.

   Except extracting the entire SLA sub-type of the QoS attribute and
   trimming the list of destination AS list, all other content MUST NOT
   be modified by any intermediate receivers of the message.

5.2.  SLA Attribute Handling at Receiver

   Reception of and processing of advertised QoS SLA content are
   optional for the receiver.  While reacting to SLA advertisement in a
   QoS attribute,

   o  the receiving BGP peer SHOULD invalidate previous advertised SLA
      parameters if one exists for the same SLA id and source AS.  If



Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 22]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


      the new advertised SLA has a non-zero traffic count, then the new
      advertised SLA SHOULD be installed.  If new advertised SLA update
      is with Traffic Class count 0, then no further action is required.

   o  When BGP UPDATE messages are triggered only as a result of SLA
      policy change, BGP UPDATE message forwarding beyond intended BGP
      peer receivers is not necessary.  If the receiver device
      implementation supports policy based filtering, then the receiver
      MAY implement a policy to filter such messages based on the prefix
      and attribute.

   If QoS attribute with the SLA is advertised to the next hop BGP peer
   who is a neighbor, the receiver MAY implement advertised SLA for the
   whole link; the link could be a physical or virtual connected to the
   neighbor.  If the QoS Attribute with the SLA is advertised to a BGP
   peer which is not the next hop neighbor, then receiver may establish
   advertised SLA for that specific prefix list under the relevant link.
   It is completely up to the receiver to decide for which prefixes it
   should accept advertised SLA and for which ones it will not accept.

6.  Error Handling

   Error conditions, while processing of the QoS attribute, MUST be
   handled with the approach of attribute-discard as described in
   [RFC7606].  In such condition, the receiver SHOULD also cleanup any
   previously installed SLA state for the same prefix.

7.  Traffic Class Mapping

   It is possible that forwarding methods used in two different ASes
   could be different.  For example, provider may tunnel a customer's IP
   traffic thru an MPLS infrastructure.  In such cases, the traffic
   class definition for QoS services may differ between the ASes.  For
   the meaningful use of advertised SLA in such cases, the receiver is
   required to map the remote traffic class to the local traffic class.

   In the example given, traffic classification in Customer AS could be
   IP Diffserv-based whereas traffic classification in Provider AS could
   be MPLS TC-based.  Thus for advertised MPLS TC-based SLA would
   require to map traffic class from IP Diffserv-based to MPLS TC type
   [RFC3270].

   There are well-defined recommendations that exist for traffic class
   mapping between two technologies (e.g.  [RFC3270] maps between DSCP
   and MPLS TC).  Receiver MAY use those defined recommendations for
   traffic class mapping or MAY define its own as per its network
   Traffic Class service definition to map to advertised Traffic




Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 23]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


   Classes.  It is completely up to the receiver how to define such
   traffic class mapping.

8.  Deployment Considerations

   One of the use cases is for a provider to advertise contracted SLA
   parameters to a Customer Edge (CE) in cases where eBGP is deployed
   between PE and CE.  The SLA parameters may already be provisioned by
   the provider on the PE device (facing CE).  This provisioned SLA
   parameters are then advertised thru proposed BGP QoS attribute to the
   CE device.  The CE device may read the attribute and SLA sub-type
   content to implement the QoS policy on the device.

   Contracted SLA from PE to CE may be full line-rate or sub line-rate
   or finer granular controlled services.  The advertised SLA can be
   useful when contracted service is sub-rate of a link and/or when for
   finer granular traffic classes that are controlled (e.g. voice, video
   services may be capped to certain rate).


                               _______________
           __________         /               \
          /          \       /                 \
         /            \     /                   \
         |CustomerSite|-----|      Provider     |
         \           C/E   P\E                  /
          \__________/       \                 /
                              \_______________/
              AS 3                   AS 2


             SLA_ADVERTISE: AS2 to AS3
             NLRI = PE ip address

                     Figure 6 - Example 1

   Another use case can be to advertise SLAs among different network
   sites within one Enterprise network.  In Hub and Spoke deployments,
   Administrator may define SLAs at spoke and advertise QoS SLA
   parameters to the Hub thru BGP updates.  In Figure 7, each spoke (AS1
   and AS2) are connected to Hub (AS3) via a VPN tunnel.  As shown in
   Figure 7, AS2 can advertise SLA to AS3 in the context of that tunnel
   ip address.








Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 24]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


                                               AS 2
                      _______________        ________
                     /               \      /        \
        _____       /                 \-----| Spoke2 |
      /      \     /                   \    \________/
      | Hub  |-----|      Provider     |     ________
      \______/     \                   /    /        \
                    \                 /-----| Spoke1 |
       AS 3          \_______________/      \________/
                                              AS 1


         SLA_ADVERTISE: AS2 to AS3
                        NLRI = AS2 tunnel address

         SLA_ADVERTISE: AS1 to AS3
                        NLRI = AS1 tunnel address

                      Figure 7 - Example 2

   Deployment options are not limited to involving CEs, PE-to-CE or CE-
   to-CE, only.  For any contract between two providers, SLA parameters
   may be advertised from one to the other.

9.  Acknowledgements

   Thanks to Fred Baker, David Black, Sue Hares and Benoit Claise for
   their suggestions and to Christian Jacquenet, Ken Briley, Rahul
   Patel, Fred Yip, Lou Berger, Brian Carpenter, Bertrand Duvivier,
   Bruno Decraene for the review.

10.  IANA Considerations

   This document defines a new BGP optional transitive path attribute,
   called QoS Attribute.  IANA action is required to allocate a new
   code-point in the BGP path Attributes registry.

   IANA is requested to create a registry for QoS Attribute subTypes.
   This is a registry of 1 octet value, to be assigned on a standards
   action/early allocation basis.  The initial assignments are:


       QoS Attribute subTypes
       ============= ========
       Reserved       0x00
       SLA            0x01
       Reserved       0x02-0xff (Standards Action)




Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 25]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


   IANA is requested to create a registry for SLA Event Types.  This is
   a registry of 4-bits value, to be assigned on a standards action or
   early allocation basis.  The initial assignments are:


       QoS Attribute SLA Event Types
       ============= ===============
       Reserved      0x0
       ADVERTISE     0x1
       Reserved      0x2 - 0xf (Standards Action)


   IANA is requested to create a registry to define QoS SLA Direction.
   This is the direction in forwarding path, advertised QoS SLA is
   applicable to.  This is a 2-bit registry.  Values for QoS SLA
   direction are:


       QoS SLA Direction                  Value
       =================                  =====
           Reserved                       0x0
       To source AS from destination AS   0x1
       From source AS to destination AS   0x2
           Reserved (Standards Action)    0x3


   QoS SLA Traffic Class Element Types will be referring to existing
   IPFIX IANA types as listed in Table 1.

   IANA is requested to create a registry for QoS SLA Traffic Class
   Service Types.  This is a registry of 2 octet values, to be assigned
   on a standards action/early allocation basis.  The initial
   assignments are:


















Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 26]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


      Traffic Class Service Type      Value
      ============================   ======
      Reserved                        0x00
      TRAFFIC_CLASS_TSPEC             0x01
      L2_OVERHEAD                     0x02
      MINRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING      0x03
      MINRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING     0x04
      MAXRATE_IN_PROFILE_MARKING      0x05
      MAXRATE_OUT_PROFILE_MARKING     0x06
      DROP_THRESHOLD                  0x07
      RELATIVE_PRIORITY               0x08
      SUB_TRAFFIC_CLASSES             0x09
      Standards Action                0x0A   - 0x3FFF
      FCFS                            0x4000 - 0x4FF0



11.  Security Considerations

   The QOS attribute defined in this document SHOULD be used by the
   managed networks for enforcing Quality of Service policies and so
   there should not be any risks for identity thefts.  To strengthen the
   security for the QoS attribute, RPKI based origin validation
   [RFC7115] MAY be used.  In addition to the RPKI based origin
   validation, BGP Path Validation (e.g., [I-D.ietf-sidr-bgpsec-
   protocol]) procedures could be used over BGP QoS attribute and its
   associated prefix in producing the digital signature that can be
   carried within the signature SLA for the messages.  This would help
   prevent any man- in-the-middle attacks.

12.  References

12.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC2212]  Shenker, S., Partridge, C., and R. Guerin, "Specification
              of Guaranteed Quality of Service", RFC 2212,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2212, September 1997,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2212>.








Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 27]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


   [RFC3270]  Le Faucheur, F., Wu, L., Davie, B., Davari, S., Vaananen,
              P., Krishnan, R., Cheval, P., and J. Heinanen, "Multi-
              Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Support of Differentiated
              Services", RFC 3270, DOI 10.17487/RFC3270, May 2002,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3270>.

   [RFC4271]  Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A
              Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>.

   [RFC4506]  Eisler, M., Ed., "XDR: External Data Representation
              Standard", STD 67, RFC 4506, DOI 10.17487/RFC4506, May
              2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4506>.

   [RFC7012]  Claise, B., Ed. and B. Trammell, Ed., "Information Model
              for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)", RFC 7012,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC7012, September 2013,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7012>.

   [RFC7115]  Bush, R., "Origin Validation Operation Based on the
              Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)", BCP 185,
              RFC 7115, DOI 10.17487/RFC7115, January 2014,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7115>.

   [RFC7606]  Chen, E., Ed., Scudder, J., Ed., Mohapatra, P., and K.
              Patel, "Revised Error Handling for BGP UPDATE Messages",
              RFC 7606, DOI 10.17487/RFC7606, August 2015,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7606>.

12.2.  Informative References

   [I-D.ietf-netconf-restconf]
              Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
              Protocol", draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-09 (work in
              progress), December 2015.

   [I-D.ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol]
              Lepinski, M., "BGPsec Protocol Specification", draft-ietf-
              sidr-bgpsec-protocol-14 (work in progress), December 2015.

   [RFC2475]  Blake, S., Black, D., Carlson, M., Davies, E., Wang, Z.,
              and W. Weiss, "An Architecture for Differentiated
              Services", RFC 2475, DOI 10.17487/RFC2475, December 1998,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2475>.






Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 28]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


   [RFC5575]  Marques, P., Sheth, N., Raszuk, R., Greene, B., Mauch, J.,
              and D. McPherson, "Dissemination of Flow Specification
              Rules", RFC 5575, DOI 10.17487/RFC5575, August 2009,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5575>.

   [RFC6020]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
              the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.

   [RFC6241]  Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
              and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
              (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.

   [RFC7297]  Boucadair, M., Jacquenet, C., and N. Wang, "IP
              Connectivity Provisioning Profile (CPP)", RFC 7297,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC7297, July 2014,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7297>.

   [RFC7674]  Haas, J., Ed., "Clarification of the Flowspec Redirect
              Extended Community", RFC 7674, DOI 10.17487/RFC7674,
              October 2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7674>.

Authors' Addresses

   Shitanshu Shah
   Cisco Systems
   170 W. Tasman Drive
   San Jose, CA  95134
   US

   Email: svshah@cisco.com


   Keyur Patel
   Cisco Systems
   170 W. Tasman Drive
   San Jose, CA  95134
   US

   Email: keyupate@cisco.com









Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 29]


Internet-Draft          Inter-domain SLA Exchange          February 2016


   Sandeep Bajaj
   Juniper Network
   1194 N. Mathilda Avenue
   Sunnyvale, CA  94089
   US

   Email: sbajaj@juniper.net


   Luis Tomotaki
   Verizon
   400 International
   Richardson, TX   75081
   US

   Email: luis.tomotaki@verizon.com


   Mohamed Boucadair
   Orange
   Rennes
   35000
   France

   Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com


























Shah, et al.             Expires August 8, 2016                [Page 30]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129b, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/