[Docs] [txt|pdf|xml|html] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]
Versions: (draft-jain-kitten-krb-auth-indicator)
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 RFC 8129
Internet Engineering Task Force A. Jain
Internet-Draft Georgia Tech
Updates: 4120 (if approved) N. Kinder
Intended status: Standards Track N. McCallum
Expires: August 21, 2015 Red Hat, Inc.
February 17, 2015
Authentication Indicator in Kerberos Tickets
draft-ietf-kitten-krb-auth-indicator-00
Abstract
This document proposes an extension in the Kerberos protocol
[RFC4120]. It defines a new Authorization Data Type AD-
AUTHENTICATION-INDICATOR. The purpose of introducing this data type
is to include an indicator of the strength of a client's
authentication in the service tickets so that the application
services can use it as an input into policy decisions.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 21, 2015.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
Jain, et al. Expires August 21, 2015 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Authentication Indicator February 2015
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Document Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. AD Type Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Appendix A. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1. Introduction
Kerberos [RFC4120] allows secure interaction among users and services
over a network. It supports a variety of authentication mechanisms
using its Pre-Authentication framework [RFC6113]. The Kerberos
Authentication Service has been architected to support password based
authentication as well as multi-factor authentication using One Time
Password devices or Public Key Cryptography. Implementations that
have Pre-Authentication mechanisms offering significantly different
strengths of client authentication may choose to keep track of the
strength of the authentication used as an input into policy
decisions. This document proposes a new Authorization Data Type to
be used to convey the authentication strength to the application
services. The AD type is wrapped in the AD-CAMMAC
[I-D.ietf-kitten-cammac] container and contains information about the
type of authentication mechanism used by the Kerberos client to
authenticate itself to the KDC.
2. Document Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
3. AD Type Specification
The KDC MAY include the following Authorization Data element, wrapped
in AD-CAMMAC, in the initial credentials and copy it from a ticket-
granting ticket into service tickets:
AD-AUTHENTICATION-INDICATOR TBD
Jain, et al. Expires August 21, 2015 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Authentication Indicator February 2015
The corresponding ad-data field contains the DER encoding of the
ASN.1 type which is defined as
AD-AUTHENTICATION-INDICATOR ::= SEQUENCE OF UTF8String
Each UTF8String value is a short string that indicates that a
particular set of requirements was met during the initial
authentication. These strings are intended to be compared against
known values. They are not intended to store structured data. These
strings MAY be site-defined strings that do not contain a colon such
as the name of the Pre-Authentication mechanism used, or
alternatively URIs that reference a Level of Assurance Profile
[RFC6711].
The AD-AUTHENTICATION-INDICATOR MUST be included in the AD-CAMMAC
container so that its contents can be protected. The AD-
AUTHENTICATION-INDICATOR MAY safely be ignored by the applications
and KDCs that do not implement this element.
4. Security Considerations
AD-AUTHENTICATION-INDICATOR is wrapped in AD-CAMMAC which supersedes
AD-KDC-ISSUED container. AD-CAMMAC allows both the application
service and the KDC to verify the authenticity of the contained
Authorization Data.
A malicious service can replace AD-CAMMAC in a service ticket with a
legitimate AD-CAMMAC present in some other ticket that the service
has received. The KDC MUST ensure that the service does not tamper
with the contents of AD-CAMMAC or the ticket by including a kdc-
verifier in the containing CAMMAC. This binding protects AD-
AUTHENTICATION-INDICATOR in case of constrained delegation such as
S4U2Proxy [MS-SFU] extension.
Using multiple strings in AD-AUTHENTICATION-INDICATOR MAY lead to
ambiguity when a service tries to make a decision based on the AD-
AUTHENTICATION-INDICATOR values. This ambiguity can be avoided if
indicator values are always used as a positive indication of certain
requirements being met during the initial authentication.
5. References
5.1. Normative References
Jain, et al. Expires August 21, 2015 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Authentication Indicator February 2015
[I-D.ietf-kitten-cammac]
Sorce, S., Yu, T., and T. Hardjono, "Kerberos
Authorization Data Container Authenticated by Multiple
MACs", draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-01 (work in progress),
January 2015.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC4120] Neuman, C., Yu, T., Hartman, S., and K. Raeburn, "The
Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5)", RFC 4120,
July 2005.
[RFC6113] Hartman, S. and L. Zhu, "A Generalized Framework for
Kerberos Pre-Authentication", RFC 6113, April 2011.
5.2. Informative References
[MS-SFU] Microsoft, "Kerberos Protocol Extensions: Service for User
and Constrained Delegation Protocol", January 2013,
<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc246071.aspx>.
[RFC6711] Johansson, L., "An IANA Registry for Level of Assurance
(LoA) Profiles", RFC 6711, August 2012.
Jain, et al. Expires August 21, 2015 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Authentication Indicator February 2015
Appendix A. Acknowledgements
Dmitri Pal (Red Hat)
Simo Sorce (Red Hat)
Authors' Addresses
Anupam Jain
Georgia Tech
225 North Ave NW
Atlanta, GA 30332
USA
EMail: ajain323@gatech.edu
Nathan Kinder
Red Hat, Inc.
444 Castro St.
Suite 500
Mountain View, CA 94041
USA
EMail: nkinder@redhat.com
Nathaniel McCallum
Red Hat, Inc.
100 East Davie Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
USA
EMail: npmccallum@redhat.com
Jain, et al. Expires August 21, 2015 [Page 5]
Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129d, available from
https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/