[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08

 INTERNET-DRAFT
 draft-ietf-ldup-subentry-07.txt
                                                      Ed Reed
                                          Reed-Matthews, Inc.
                                                March 1, 2001
 
                     LDAP Subentry Schema
 
 
 1  Status of this Memo
 
 This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full
 conformance with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
 
 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet
 Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working
 groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working
 documents as Internet-Drafts.
 
 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of
 six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by
 other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use
 Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other
 than as "work in progress."
 
 The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
 http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
 
 The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be
 accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
 
 This Internet-Draft expires on September 1, 2001.
 
 
 2  Abstract / Description
 
 This document describes two object classes called
 ldapSubEntry and inheritableLDAPSubEntry, and a control,
 ldapSubentriesControl (to control the visibility of entries
 of type ldapSubEntry) which MUST be used by directory
 servers claiming support for the features of this document
 to indicate operations and management related entries in
 the directory, called LDAP Subentries.  Scope rules are
 defined for LDAP Subentries.
 
 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL",
 "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
 and  "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
 
 
 Reed                                                        [Page 1]

                 Expires September 1, 2001 


 
 
 INTERNET-DRAFT                                 1 March 2001
                     LDAP Subentry Schema
 
 described in [RFC2119]. The sections below reiterate these
 definitions and include some additional ones.
 
 
 
 3  Table of Contents
 
 1  Status of this Memo                                          1
 2  Abstract / Description                                       1
 3  Table of Contents                                            2
 4  Object Class Definitions                                     2
 4.1  ldapSubEntry Class                                          2
 4.1.1     Scope Rules                                            3
 4.2  InheritableLDAPSubentry Class                               4
 4.2.1     Illustration                                           5
 5  Attribute Definitions                                        6
 5.1  inheritable Attribute                                       6
 5.2  blockInheritance Attribute                                  6
 6  Visibility Controls                                          7
 6.1  ldapSubentriesControl                                       7
 6.1.1     LDAP Search with scope other than baseObject           7
 6.1.2     LDAP Search with scope of baseObject                   7
 6.1.3     Other LDAP operations                                  8
 6.1.4     Correspondence to X.500 [X.511]                        8
 7  Security Considerations                                      8
 8  References                                                   9
 9  Copyright Notice                                             9
 10 Acknowledgements                                             10
 11 Author's Address                                             11
 
 
 
 4  Object Class Definitions
 
 
 4.1 ldapSubEntry Class
 
 ( 2.16.840.1.113719.2.142.6.1.1 NAME 'ldapSubEntry'
    DESC 'LDAP Subentry class, version 1'
      SUP top STRUCTURAL
      MAY ( cn ) )
 
 The class ldapSubEntry is intended to be used as a super-
 class when defining other structural classes to be used
 as LDAP Subentries, and as the structural class to which
 Auxiliary classes may be added for application specific
 subentry information.  Where possible, the use of Auxiliary
 classes to extend LDAP Subentries is strongly preferred.
 
 Reed                                               [Page 2]

                 Expires September 1, 2001
  


 
 
 INTERNET-DRAFT                                 1 March 2001
                     LDAP Subentry Schema
 
 
 The presence of ldapSubEntry in the list of super-classes
 of an entry in the directory makes that entry an LDAP
 Subentry.  Object classes derived from ldapSubEntry are
 themselves considered ldapSubEntry classes, for the purpose
 of this discussion.
 
 LDAP Subentries MAY be named by their commonName attribute
 [RFC2251].  Other naming attributes are also permitted.
 
 LDAP Subentries MAY be containers, unlike their [X.501]
 counterparts.
 
 LDAP Subentries MAY be contained by, and will usually be
 located in the directory information tree immediately
 subordinate to, administrative points.  Further (unlike
 X.500 subentries), LDAP Subentries MAY be contained by
 other LDAP Subentries (the way organizational units may be
 contained by other organizational units).  Deep nesting of
 LDAP Subentries are discouraged, but not prohibited.
 Developers are warned that deep nesting of LDAP Subentries
 may not be supported by all (or indeed, by any) LDAP server
 implementations.
 
 
 4.1.1Scope Rules
 
 The default scope of an LDAP Subentry is limited to the
 administrative area in which it is defined.  Specifically,
 the subtree of the directory namespace based at the
 administrative point most immediately superior to the LDAP
 Subentry, down to but not including any subordinate
 administrative points or areas.  Policy defined in an LDAP
 Subentry is not inheritable, unless such inheritance is
 explicitly defined (see the object class definition for
 InheritableLDAPSubEntry, below, for such an example).
 
 If an LDAP Subentry is subordinate to another LDAP
 Subentry, it takes the same default scope as the parent
 LDAP Subentry.
 
 Applications MAY define alternative scope semantics for
 classes they define which are derived from the ldapSubEntry
 class. This means that an application can derive a new
 class from the ldapSubEntry class and add an attribute,
 like subtreeSpecification [X.501] or inheritance controls
 (see below), to define a new scope rule for that
 application to use.
 
 Reed                                               [Page 3]

                 Expires September 1, 2001
  


 
 
 INTERNET-DRAFT                                 1 March 2001
                     LDAP Subentry Schema
 
 Applications MUST NOT define alternative scope rules for
 auxiliary classes used to decorate entries of the
 ldapSubEntry class.  This restriction is required to avoid
 having conflicting or contradictory scope definitions
 applied by different applications to the same LDAP
 Subentry.
 
 
 4.2 InheritableLDAPSubEntry Class
 
 ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7628.5.6.1.1 NAME 'inheritableLDAPSubEntry'
    DESC 'Inheritable LDAP Subentry class, version 1'
    SUP ldapSubEntry STRUCTURAL
    MUST ( inheritable )
    MAY  ( blockInheritance )
 
 The InheritableLDAPSubentry class is derived from the
 ldapSubEntry class and provides modified scope semantics to
 permit and control inheritance from one administrative area
 to one or more subordinate administrative areas.
 
 If the 'inheritable' attribute is TRUE (1), then the policy
 information contained in the InheritableLDAPSubEntry is
 intended to apply to any (and all) subordinate
 administrative areas.  Subordinate administrative areas
 MUST include Inheritable LDAP Subentries from their
 immediately superior administrative area (unless blocked,
 see below).  The means of such inclusion (that is, whether
 via replication, caching, or explicitly walking the tree to
 locate and "include" them, are left to the application that
 consumes the inheritable policy information contained on
 the inheritableLDAPSubEntry.
 
 If the 'inheritable' attribute is FALSE (0), the policy is
 NOT inheritable, and subordinate administrative areas MUST
 treat the associated policy information as UNDEFINED (that
 is, absent) unless explicitly defined within their own
 administrative area.
 
 If a subordinate administrative area defines an Inheritable
 LDAP Subentry for an application with the same name as one
 defined in a superior administrative area, and if the
 subordinateÆs Inheritable LDAP Subentry has the attribute
 'blockInheritance' with the value TRUE, then inheritance is
 blocked from the superior administrative area to that
 subordinate administrative area, and the effect is the same
 as if the superior Inheritable LDAP Subentry contained the
 'inheritable' attribute set to FALSE.
 
 Reed                                               [Page 4]

                 Expires September 1, 2001
  


 
 
 INTERNET-DRAFT                                 1 March 2001
                     LDAP Subentry Schema
 
 The value of the 'blockInheritance' attribute in a superior
 administrative area Inheritable LDAP Subentry is irrelevant
 to a subordinate administrative area for this object class.
 
 No mechanism is defined (at this time) to signal to
 subordinate administrative areas that they may not block
 inheritable policy from superior administrative areas.
 
 
 4.2.1Illustration
 
 An illustration may help clarify the use of the class and
 these attributes.
 
 Suppose the administrative area based at 'dc=com' has an
 Inheritable LDAP Subentry for an application defined with
 the 'inheritable' attribute set to TRUE.  Subordinate
 administrative areas, for instance 'dc=widget, dc=com'
 might or might not want to accept the inherited policy from
 the 'dc=com' administrative area.
 
 If the administrator of the 'dc=widget, dc=com'
 administrative area creates an Inheritable LDAP Subentry
 (say, 'cn=example, dc=widget, dc=com') with the same
 relative distinguished name as used in the 'dc=com'
 administrative area (that is, 'cn=example, dc=com') setting
 the 'blockInheritance' attribute set to TRUE, then the
 inheritance of the policy defined (on 'cn=example, dc=com')
 is effectively blocked from affecting the 'dc=widget,
 dc=com' administrative area.  WeÆll call this a blocking
 subentry for our discussion here.
 
 If the administrator of the 'dc=widget, dc=com'
 administrative area creates a blocking subentry (as above)
 with some locally defined policy information, that policy
 information effectively replaces the policy information
 defined by the superior administrative area.  WeÆll call
 this an over-riding subentry for our discussion here.
 
 An over-riding subentry MAY itself be inheritable, in which
 case the 'inheritable' attribute on the locally defined
 Inheritable LDAP Subentry MAY be set to TRUE or FALSE, at
 the discretion of the local administrative authority, with
 appropriate implications for inheritance of the new,
 locally defined policy, on any other subordinate
 administrative areas.  In this way, the 'dc=widget, dc=com'
 administrator can set inheritable policy for organizational
 units (like 'ou=eng, dc=widget, dc=com') for an application
 
 Reed                                               [Page 5]

                 Expires September 1, 2001
  


 
 
 INTERNET-DRAFT                                 1 March 2001
                     LDAP Subentry Schema
 
 while over-riding inheritable policy from the superior
 'dc=com' administrative area.
 
 
 
 5  Attribute Definitions
 
 
 5.1 inheritable Attribute
 
 ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7628.5.4.1 NAME 'inheritable'
    SYNTAX BOOLEAN
    SINGLE-VALUE NO-USER-MODIFICATION USAGE dSAOperation )
 
 Used to signal whether an inheritableLDAPSubEntry is
 intended to be inherited by subordinate administrative
 areas, or not.  TRUE indicates that the subentry and the
 policy it contains is inheritable.
 
 FALSE indicates that information from the
 inheritableLDAPSubEntry is not to be inherited by
 subordinate administrative areas.
 
 
 5.2 blockInheritance Attribute
 
 ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7628.5.4.2 NAME 'blockInheritance'
    SYNTAX BOOLEAN
    SINGLE-VALUE NO-USER-MODIFICATION USAGE dSAOperation )
 
 Used by administrators of subordinate administrative areas
 to over-ride, or block, the inheritance of
 inheritableLDAPSubEntry policy from superior administrative
 areas.
 
 A value of TRUE indicates that inheritance is to be
 blocked.
 
 A value of FALSE is implies that inheritance is not to be
 blocked, but specific semantic interpretation is left to
 applications (who may specify any of a variety of policy
 aggregation mechanisms to define how inherited policy is to
 be mixed with locally defined policy, which mechanisms are
 explicitly outside the scope of this specification).
 
 
 
 
 
 Reed                                               [Page 6]

                 Expires September 1, 2001
  


 
 
 INTERNET-DRAFT                                 1 March 2001
                     LDAP Subentry Schema
 
 6  Visibility Controls
 
 
 6.1 ldapSubentriesControl
 
 This control is included in the searchRequest message as
 part of the controls field of the LDAPMessage, as defined
 in Section 4.1.12 of [RFC2251].
 
 The controlType is set to "1.3.6.1.4.1.7628.5.101.1". The
 criticality MAY be set to either TRUE or FALSE.  The
 controlValue is absent.
 
 There is no corresponding response control defined.
 
 LDAP servers that support this control MUST treat LDAP
 Subentries as "operational objects" in much the same way
 that "operational attributes" are not returned in search
 results and [X.511] read operations when only user
 attributes are requested.
 
 Entries which are not LDAP Subentries may still be
 referenced in the base object of search operations where
 the ldapSubentriesControl is present in the request.
 
 
 6.1.1LDAP Search with scope other than baseObject
 
 The ldapSubentriesControl is defined for LDAP to signal to
 LDAP Search operations that ONLY LDAP Subentries are to be
 included in the return set of entries for the Search,
 provided other Search criteria (such as scope and filter)
 are satisfied.  When ldapSubentriesControl is NOT included
 in a Search request on a server that supports the control,
 LDAP Subentries MUST be omitted from the return set (with
 the single exception described in Search Filter Visibility,
 below).
 
 
 6.1.2LDAP Search with scope of baseObject
 
 For Search operations with a scope value of baseObject, the
 presence or absence of the ldapSubentriesControl MUST be
 ignored.  Specifically, baseObject searches applied to
 ldapSubEntry entries MUST be evaluated by Search as if the
 ldapSubentriesControl is present, even if it is absent.
 
 
 
 Reed                                               [Page 7]

                 Expires September 1, 2001
  


 
 
 INTERNET-DRAFT                                 1 March 2001
                     LDAP Subentry Schema
 
 This provision is intended to preserve the behavior of
 [X.511] Read operations, which are not affected by the
 [X.511] subentries control (see Correspondence to X.500,
 below), and because it would seem silly to behave
 otherwise.
 
 
 6.1.3Other LDAP operations
 
 The ldapSubentriesControl is not defined for any LDAP
 operation other than Search.  However, an LDAPv3 Extension
 MAY define a use of this control with that extension as
 long as such use is consistent with this specification.
 
 
 6.1.4Correspondence to X.500 [X.511]
 
 In [X.511] a ServiceControl option is used to govern the
 visibility of [X.501] subentries.  The subentry
 ServiceControl option is a specific bit of a bitstring
 that, when set to TRUE in the common arguments of an X.500
 Search or List operation, indicates that the operation is
 to access ONLY the subentries found in the context of the
 list or search.  In fact, normal entries are explicitly NOT
 returned in the result of a list or search operation when
 the X.500 subentries ServiceControl is set.
 
 Entries which are not subentries may still be referenced in
 the base object of list and search operations where the
 subentries control is set.
 
 The [X.511] subentries ServiceControl has no meaning for
 operations other than Search and List (i.e., Read, Modify,
 Delete, etc.).
 
 In [X.501], the scope of a subentry is a subtree or subtree
 refinement.  The ldapSubEntry class defined in this
 document provides no mechanism to define a subtree
 refinement.
 
 
 
 7  Security Considerations
 
 LDAP Subentries will frequently be used to hold data which
 reflects either the actual or intended behavior of the
 directory service.  As such, permission to read such
 entries MAY need to be restricted to authorized users.
 
 Reed                                               [Page 8]

                 Expires September 1, 2001
  


 
 
 INTERNET-DRAFT                                 1 March 2001
                     LDAP Subentry Schema
 
 More importantly, IF a directory service treats the
 information in an LDAP Subentry as the authoritative source
 of policy to be used to control the behavior of the
 directory, then permission to create, modify, or delete
 such entries MUST be carefully restricted to authorized
 administrators.
 
 This specification defines a policy inheritance model that
 allows subordinate administrators to over-ride policy
 defined by administrators of administrative areas superior
 to the local administrative area.  No mechanism is defined
 here to keep local administrators from over-riding such
 inherited policy.  Implementations that intend to provide
 such control over the actions of subordinate administrators
 will require additional semantics (and possibly syntax).
 
 
 
 8  References
 
 [RFC2119] S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to
 Indicate Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, March 1997
 
 [RFC2251] S. Kille, M. Wahl, and T. Howes, "Lightweight
 Directory Access Protocol (v3)", RFC 2251, December 1997
 
 [X.501] ITU-T Rec. X.501, "The Directory: Models", 1993 and
 subsequent versions
 
 [X.511] ITU-T Rec. X.501, "The Directory: Abstract Service
 Definition", 1993 and subsequent versions
 
 
 
 
 
 9  Copyright Notice
 
 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights
 Reserved.
 
 This document and translations of it may be copied and
 furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on
 or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may
 be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or
 in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the
 above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on
 all such copies and derivative works. However, this
 
 Reed                                               [Page 9]

                 Expires September 1, 2001
  


 
 
 INTERNET-DRAFT                                 1 March 2001
                     LDAP Subentry Schema
 
 document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by
 removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet
 Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed
 for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which
 case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet
 Standards process must be followed, or as required to
 translate it into languages other than English.
 
 The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and
 will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its
 successors or assigns.
 
 This document and the information contained herein is
 provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND
 THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL
 WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
 TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL
 NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
 MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE."
 
 
 10 Acknowledgements
 
 The utility of subEntry object class was originally
 suggested as a means to store Replica and Replication
 Agreement information with a the lucid explanation by Mark
 Wahl, (then of Innosoft), of how they could be used and
 extended.
 
 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope
 of any intellectual property or other rights that might be
 claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the
 technology described in this document or the extent to
 which any license under such rights might or might not be
 available; neither does it represent that it has made any
 effort to identify any such rights. Information on the
 IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track
 and standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11.
 Copies of claims of rights made available for publication
 and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the
 result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or
 permission for the use of such proprietary rights by
 implementers or users of this specification can be obtained
 from the IETF Secretariat.
 
 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its
 attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications,
 or other proprietary rights which may cover technology that
 
 Reed                                              [Page 10]

                 Expires September 1, 2001
  


 
 
 INTERNET-DRAFT                                 1 March 2001
                     LDAP Subentry Schema
 
 may be required to practice this standard. Please address
 the information to the IETF Executive Director.
 
 
 11 Author's Address
 
      Edwards E. Reed
      Reed-Matthews, Inc.
      1064 E 140 North
      Lindon, UT  84042
      USA
      E-mail: eer@oncalldba.com
 
      LDUP Mailing List: ietf-ldup@imc.org
      LDAPEXT Mailing List: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Reed                                              [Page 11]

                 Expires September 1, 2001
 

Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.124, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/