[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02 03 04 RFC 3107

Network Working Group                                Yakov Rekhter
Internet Draft                                       Cisco Systems
Expiration Date: March 2000                             Eric Rosen
                                                     Cisco Systems

                  Carrying Label Information in BGP-4

                    draft-ietf-mpls-bgp4-mpls-03.txt

1. Status of this Memo

   This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as ``work in progress.''

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

2. Abstract

   When a pair of Label Switch Routers (LSRs) that maintain BGP peering
   with each other exchange routes, the LSRs also need to exchange label
   mapping information for these routes. The exchange is accomplished by
   piggybacking the label mapping information for a route in the same
   BGP Update message that is used to exchange the route. This document
   specifies the way in which this is done.

draft-ietf-mpls-bgp4-mpls-03.txt                                [Page 1]


Internet Draft      draft-ietf-mpls-bgp4-mpls-03.txt      September 1999

3. Overview

   The Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) architecture [MPLS-ARCH]
   identifies situations in which the mapping between a label and a
   route must be distributed between BGP peers. This document specifies
   how this label mapping information is distributed. The label mapping
   information is included in the BGP Update message that is used to
   distribute the route.  This is done by utilizing BGP-4 Multiprotocol
   Extensions attribute [BGP-MP].

4. Carrying Label Mapping Information

   Label mapping information is carried as part of the Network Layer
   Reachability Information (NLRI) in the Multiprotocol Extensions
   attributes. Such NLRI is identified by using SAFI TBD.

   The Network Layer Reachability information is encoded as one or more
   triples of the form <label, length, prefix>, whose fields are
   described below:

      +---------------------------+
      |   Length (1 octet)        |
      +---------------------------+
      |   Label (3 octets)        |
      +---------------------------+
      .............................
      +---------------------------+
      |   Prefix (variable)       |
      +---------------------------+

   The use and the meaning of these fields are as follows:

      a) Length:

         The Length field indicates the length in bits of the address
         prefix plus the label(s).

      b) Label:

         The Label field carries one or more labels (that corresponds to
         the stack of labels [MPLS-ENCAPS]). Each label is encoded as 3
         octets, where the high-order bit contains "Bottom of Stack" (as
         defined in [MPLS-ENCAPS]). The following high-order three bits

draft-ietf-mpls-bgp4-mpls-03.txt                                [Page 2]


Internet Draft      draft-ietf-mpls-bgp4-mpls-03.txt      September 1999

         must be zero.  The remaining 20 bits contain the label value.

      c) Prefix:

         The Prefix field contains address prefixes followed by enough
         trailing bits to make the end of the field fall on an octet
         boundary.  Note that the value of trailing bits is irrelevant.

   The label(s) specified for a particular route (and associated with it
   address prefix) must be assigned by the LSR which is identified by
   the value of the Next Hop attribute of the route.

   When a BGP speaker redistributes a route, the label(s) assigned to
   that route must not be changed (except by omission), unless the
   speaker changes the value of the Next Hop attribute of the route.

   A BGP speaker can withdraw a previously advertised route (as well as
   the binding between this route and a label) by either (a) advertising
   a new route (and a label) with the same NLRI as the previously
   advertised route, or (b) listing the NLRI of the previously
   advertised route in the Withdrawn Routes field of an Update message.
   The label information carried (as part of NLRI) in the Withdrawn
   Routes field should be set to 0x800000.

5. Advertising Multiple Routes to a Destination

   A BGP speaker may maintain (and advertise to its peers) more than one
   route to a given destination, as long as each such route has its own
   label(s).

   The encoding described above allows a single BGP Update message to
   carry multiple routes, each with its own label(s).

   In the case where a BGP speaker advertises multiple routes to a
   destination, if a route is withdrawn, and a label(s) is specified at
   the time of withdrawal, only  the corresponding route  with the
   corresponding label is  withdrawn. If a route is withdrawn, and no
   label is specified at the time of withdrawal, then only the
   corresponding unlabeled route is withdrawn; the labeled routes are
   left  in place.

draft-ietf-mpls-bgp4-mpls-03.txt                                [Page 3]


Internet Draft      draft-ietf-mpls-bgp4-mpls-03.txt      September 1999

6. Capability Negotiation

   A BGP speaker that uses Multiprotocol Extensions to carry label
   mapping information should use the Capabilities Optional Parameter,
   as defined in [BGP-CAP], to inform its peers about this capability.
   The MP_EXT Capability Code, as defined in [BGP-MP], is used to
   negotiate the (AFI, SAFI) pairs available on a particular connection.

   A BGP speaker should not advertise this capability to another BGP
   speaker unless there is a Label Switched Path (LSP) between the two
   speakers.

   A BGP speaker that is capable of handling multiple routes to a
   destination (as described above) should use the Capabilities Optional
   Paramter, as defined in [BGP-CAP], to inform its peers about this
   capability. The value of this capability is TBD.

7. Security Considerations

   Security issues are not discussed in this document.

8. Acknowledgements

   To be supplied.

9. References

   [BGP-4] "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4), Y. Rekhter, T.  Li (RFC
   1771) http://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1771.txt

   [BGP-CAP] "Capabilities Negotiation with BGP-4", R. Chandra, et al,
   Work in progress, http://www.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-
   ietf-idr-bgp4-cap-neg-03.txt

   [BGP-MP] "Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4", T. Bates, et al (RFC
   2283) http://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc2283.txt

   [MPLS-ARCH], "A Proposed Architecture for MPLS", E. Rosen, et al,
   Work in progress, http://www.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-
   ietf-mpls-arch-06.txt

   [MPLS-ENCAPS], "MPLS Label Stack Encoding", E. Rosen, et al, Work in
   progress, http://www.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-
   label-encaps-05.txt

draft-ietf-mpls-bgp4-mpls-03.txt                                [Page 4]


Internet Draft      draft-ietf-mpls-bgp4-mpls-03.txt      September 1999

10. Author Information

   Yakov Rekhter
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   170 West Tasman Drive
   San Jose, CA 95134
   email: yakov@cisco.com

   Eric Rosen
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   250 Apollo Drive
   Chelmsford, MA 01824
   email: erosen@cisco.com

draft-ietf-mpls-bgp4-mpls-03.txt                                [Page 5]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129c, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/