[Docs] [txt|pdf|xml|html] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: (draft-kwatsen-netconf-crypto-types) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13

NETCONF Working Group                                          K. Watsen
Internet-Draft                                           Watsen Networks
Intended status: Standards Track                                 H. Wang
Expires: April 20, 2020                                           Huawei
                                                        October 18, 2019


                Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography
                   draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types-11

Abstract

   This document defines YANG identities, typedefs, the groupings useful
   for cryptographic applications.

Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)

   This draft contains many placeholder values that need to be replaced
   with finalized values at the time of publication.  This note
   summarizes all of the substitutions that are needed.  No other RFC
   Editor instructions are specified elsewhere in this document.

   Artwork in this document contains shorthand references to drafts in
   progress.  Please apply the following replacements:

   o  "XXXX" --> the assigned RFC value for this draft

   Artwork in this document contains placeholder values for the date of
   publication of this draft.  Please apply the following replacement:

   o  "2019-10-18" --> the publication date of this draft

   The following Appendix section is to be removed prior to publication:

   o  Appendix B.  Change Log

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                 [Page 1]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on April 20, 2020.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  The Crypto Types Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.1.  Tree Diagram  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.2.  YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   3.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  51
     3.1.  Support for Algorithms  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  51
     3.2.  No Support for CRMF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  51
     3.3.  Access to Data Nodes  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  51
   4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  52
     4.1.  The IETF XML Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  52
     4.2.  The YANG Module Names Registry  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  53
   5.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  53
     5.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  53
     5.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  55
   Appendix A.  Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  58
     A.1.  The "asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping" Grouping  .  58
     A.2.  The "generate-certificate-signing-request" Action . . . .  60
     A.3.  The "certificate-expiration" Notification . . . . . . . .  61
   Appendix B.  Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  62
     B.1.  I-D to 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  62
     B.2.  00 to 01  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  62
     B.3.  01 to 02  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  62
     B.4.  02 to 03  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  63
     B.5.  03 to 04  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  63
     B.6.  04 to 05  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  64
     B.7.  05 to 06  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  64



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                 [Page 2]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


     B.8.  06 to 07  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  64
     B.9.  07 to 08  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  65
     B.10. 08 to 09  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  65
     B.11. 09 to 10  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  65
     B.12. 10 to 11  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  65
   Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  66
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  66

1.  Introduction

   This document defines a YANG 1.1 [RFC7950] module specifying
   identities, typedefs, and groupings useful for cryptography.

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

2.  The Crypto Types Module

2.1.  Tree Diagram

   This section provides a tree diagram [RFC8340] for the "ietf-crypto-
   types" module.  Only the groupings as represented, as tree diagrams
   have no means to represent identities or typedefs.

   module: ietf-crypto-types

     grouping symmetric-key-grouping
       +-- algorithm           encryption-algorithm-t
       +-- key-format?         identityref
       +-- (key-type)
          +--:(key)
          |  +-- key?          binary
          +--:(hidden-key)
             +-- hidden-key?   empty
     grouping public-key-grouping
       +-- algorithm            asymmetric-key-algorithm-t
       +-- public-key-format?   identityref
       +-- public-key           binary
     grouping asymmetric-key-pair-grouping
       +-- algorithm                   asymmetric-key-algorithm-t
       +-- public-key-format?          identityref
       +-- public-key                  binary
       +-- private-key-format?         identityref
       +-- (private-key-type)
          +--:(private-key)



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                 [Page 3]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


          |  +-- private-key?          binary
          +--:(hidden-private-key)
             +-- hidden-private-key?   empty
     grouping trust-anchor-cert-grouping
       +-- cert?                     trust-anchor-cert-cms
       +---n certificate-expiration
          +-- expiration-date    yang:date-and-time
     grouping trust-anchor-certs-grouping
       +-- cert*                     trust-anchor-cert-cms
       +---n certificate-expiration
          +-- expiration-date    yang:date-and-time
     grouping end-entity-cert-grouping
       +-- cert?                     end-entity-cert-cms
       +---n certificate-expiration
          +-- expiration-date    yang:date-and-time
     grouping end-entity-certs-grouping
       +-- cert*                     end-entity-cert-cms
       +---n certificate-expiration
          +-- expiration-date    yang:date-and-time
     grouping asymmetric-key-pair-with-cert-grouping
       +-- algorithm
       |       asymmetric-key-algorithm-t
       +-- public-key-format?                      identityref
       +-- public-key                              binary
       +-- private-key-format?                     identityref
       +-- (private-key-type)
       |  +--:(private-key)
       |  |  +-- private-key?                      binary
       |  +--:(hidden-private-key)
       |     +-- hidden-private-key?               empty
       +-- cert?                                   end-entity-cert-cms
       +---n certificate-expiration
       |  +-- expiration-date    yang:date-and-time
       +---x generate-certificate-signing-request
          +---w input
          |  +---w subject       binary
          |  +---w attributes?   binary
          +--ro output
             +--ro certificate-signing-request    binary
     grouping asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping
       +-- algorithm
       |       asymmetric-key-algorithm-t
       +-- public-key-format?                      identityref
       +-- public-key                              binary
       +-- private-key-format?                     identityref
       +-- (private-key-type)
       |  +--:(private-key)
       |  |  +-- private-key?                      binary



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                 [Page 4]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


       |  +--:(hidden-private-key)
       |     +-- hidden-private-key?               empty
       +-- certificates
       |  +-- certificate* [name]
       |     +-- name?                     string
       |     +-- cert?                     end-entity-cert-cms
       |     +---n certificate-expiration
       |        +-- expiration-date    yang:date-and-time
       +---x generate-certificate-signing-request
          +---w input
          |  +---w subject       binary
          |  +---w attributes?   binary
          +--ro output
             +--ro certificate-signing-request    binary

2.2.  YANG Module

   This module has normative references to [RFC2404], [RFC3565],
   [RFC3686], [RFC4106], [RFC4253], [RFC4279], [RFC4309], [RFC4494],
   [RFC4543], [RFC4868], [RFC5280], [RFC5652], [RFC5656], [RFC6187],
   [RFC6991], [RFC7919], [RFC8268], [RFC8332], [RFC8341], [RFC8422],
   [RFC8446], and [ITU.X690.2015].

   This module has an informational reference to [RFC2986], [RFC3174],
   [RFC4493], [RFC5915], [RFC6125], [RFC6234], [RFC6239], [RFC6507],
   [RFC8017], [RFC8032], [RFC8439].

   <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-crypto-types@2019-10-18.yang"

   module ietf-crypto-types {
     yang-version 1.1;
     namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-crypto-types";
     prefix ct;

     import ietf-yang-types {
       prefix yang;
       reference
         "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
     }

     import ietf-netconf-acm {
       prefix nacm;
       reference
         "RFC 8341: Network Configuration Access Control Model";
     }

     organization
       "IETF NETCONF (Network Configuration) Working Group";



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                 [Page 5]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


     contact
       "WG Web:   <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/netconf/>
        WG List:  <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
        Author:   Kent Watsen <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>
        Author:   Wang Haiguang <wang.haiguang.shieldlab@huawei.com>";

     description
       "This module defines common YANG types for cryptographic
        applications.

        Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified
        as authors of the code. All rights reserved.

        Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with
        or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and
        subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified
        BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's
        Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
        (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).

        This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
        (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC
        itself for full legal notices.;

        The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL',
        'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED',
        'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document
        are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119)
        (RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all
        capitals, as shown here.";

     revision 2019-10-18 {
       description
         "Initial version";
       reference
         "RFC XXXX: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
     }

     /**************************************/
     /*   Identities for Hash Algorithms   */
     /**************************************/

     typedef hash-algorithm-t {
       type union {
         type uint16;
         type enumeration {
           enum NONE {
             value 0;



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                 [Page 6]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


             description
               "Hash algorithm is NULL.";
           }
           enum sha1 {
             value 1;
             status obsolete;
             description
               "The SHA1 algorithm.";
             reference
               "RFC 3174: US Secure Hash Algorithms 1 (SHA1).";
           }
           enum sha-224 {
             value 2;
             description
               "The SHA-224 algorithm.";
             reference
               "RFC 6234: US Secure Hash Algorithms.";
           }
           enum sha-256 {
             value 3;
             description
               "The SHA-256 algorithm.";
             reference
               "RFC 6234: US Secure Hash Algorithms.";
           }
           enum sha-384 {
             value 4;
             description
               "The SHA-384 algorithm.";
             reference
               "RFC 6234: US Secure Hash Algorithms.";
           }
           enum sha-512 {
             value 5;
             description
               "The SHA-512 algorithm.";
             reference
               "RFC 6234: US Secure Hash Algorithms.";
           }
           enum shake-128 {
             value 6;
             description
               "The SHA3 algorithm with 128-bits output.";
             reference
               "National Institute of Standards and Technology,
               SHA-3 Standard: Permutation-Based Hash and
               Extendable-Output Functions, FIPS PUB 202, DOI
               10.6028/NIST.FIPS.202, August 2015.";



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                 [Page 7]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


           }
           enum shake-224 {
             value 7;
             description
               "The SHA3 algorithm with 224-bits output.";
             reference
               "National Institute of Standards and Technology,
               SHA-3 Standard: Permutation-Based Hash and
               Extendable-Output Functions, FIPS PUB 202, DOI
               10.6028/NIST.FIPS.202, August 2015.";
           }
           enum shake-256 {
             value 8;
             description
               "The SHA3 algorithm with 256-bits output.";
             reference
               "National Institute of Standards and Technology,
               SHA-3 Standard: Permutation-Based Hash and
               Extendable-Output Functions, FIPS PUB 202, DOI
               10.6028/NIST.FIPS.202, August 2015.";
           }
           enum shake-384 {
             value 9;
             description
               "The SHA3 algorithm with 384-bits output.";
             reference
               "National Institute of Standards and Technology,
               SHA-3 Standard: Permutation-Based Hash and
               Extendable-Output Functions, FIPS PUB 202, DOI
               10.6028/NIST.FIPS.202, August 2015.";
           }
           enum shake-512 {
             value 10;
             description
               "The SHA3 algorithm with 384-bits output.";
             reference
               "National Institute of Standards and Technology,
               SHA-3 Standard: Permutation-Based Hash and
               Extendable-Output Functions, FIPS PUB 202, DOI
               10.6028/NIST.FIPS.202, August 2015.";
           }
         }
       }
       default "0";
       description
         "The uint16 filed shall be set by individual protocol families
          according to the hash algorithm value assigned by IANA. The
          setting is optional and by default is 0.  The enumeration



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                 [Page 8]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


          filed is set to the selected hash algorithm.";
     }

     /***********************************************/
     /*  Identities for Asymmetric Key Algorithms   */
     /***********************************************/

     typedef asymmetric-key-algorithm-t {
       type union {
         type uint16;
         type enumeration {
           enum NONE {
             value 0;
             description
               "Asymetric key algorithm is NULL.";
           }
           enum rsa1024 {
             value 1;
             description
               "The RSA algorithm using a 1024-bit key.";
             reference
               "RFC 8017: PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography
                Specifications Version 2.2.";
           }
           enum rsa2048 {
             value 2;
             description
               "The RSA algorithm using a 2048-bit key.";
             reference
               "RFC 8017:
                PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
           }
           enum rsa3072 {
             value 3;
             description
               "The RSA algorithm using a 3072-bit key.";
             reference
               "RFC 8017:
                PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
           }
           enum rsa4096 {
             value 4;
             description
               "The RSA algorithm using a 4096-bit key.";
             reference
               "RFC 8017:
                PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
           }



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                 [Page 9]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


           enum rsa7680 {
             value 5;
             description
               "The RSA algorithm using a 7680-bit key.";
             reference
               "RFC 8017:
                PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
           }
           enum rsa15360 {
             value 6;
             description
               "The RSA algorithm using a 15360-bit key.";
             reference
               "RFC 8017:
                PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
           }
           enum secp192r1 {
             value 7;
             description
               "The asymmetric algorithm using a NIST P192 Curve.";
             reference
               "RFC 6090:
                  Fundamental Elliptic Curve Cryptography Algorithms.
                RFC 5480:
                   Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key
                   Information.";
           }
           enum secp224r1 {
             value 8;
             description
               "The asymmetric algorithm using a NIST P224 Curve.";
             reference
               "RFC 6090:
                  Fundamental Elliptic Curve Cryptography Algorithms.
                RFC 5480:
                  Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key
                  Information.";
           }
           enum secp256r1 {
             value 9;
             description
               "The asymmetric algorithm using a NIST P256 Curve.";
             reference
               "RFC 6090:
                  Fundamental Elliptic Curve Cryptography Algorithms.
                RFC 5480:
                  Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key
                  Information.";



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 10]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


           }
           enum secp384r1 {
             value 10;
             description
               "The asymmetric algorithm using a NIST P384 Curve.";
             reference
               "RFC 6090:
                  Fundamental Elliptic Curve Cryptography Algorithms.
                RFC 5480:
                  Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key
                  Information.";
           }
           enum secp521r1 {
             value 11;
             description
               "The asymmetric algorithm using a NIST P521 Curve.";
             reference
               "RFC 6090:
                  Fundamental Elliptic Curve Cryptography Algorithms.
                RFC 5480:
                  Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key
                  Information.";
           }
           enum x25519 {
             value 12;
             description
               "The asymmetric algorithm using a x.25519 Curve.";
             reference
               "RFC 7748:
                  Elliptic Curves for Security.";
           }
           enum x448 {
             value 13;
             description
               "The asymmetric algorithm using a x.448 Curve.";
             reference
               "RFC 7748:
                  Elliptic Curves for Security.";
           }
         }
       }
       default "0";
       description
         "The uint16 filed shall be set by individual protocol
          families according to the asymmetric key algorithm value
          assigned by IANA. The setting is optional and by default
          is 0.  The enumeration filed is set to the selected
          asymmetric key algorithm.";



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 11]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


     }

     /*************************************/
     /*   Identities for MAC Algorithms   */
     /*************************************/

     typedef mac-algorithm-t {
       type union {
         type uint16;
         type enumeration {
           enum NONE {
             value 0;
             description
               "mac algorithm is NULL.";
           }
           enum hmac-sha1 {
             value 1;
             description
               "Generating MAC using SHA1 hash function";
             reference
               "RFC 3174: US Secure Hash Algorithm 1 (SHA1)";
           }
           enum hmac-sha1-96 {
             value 2;
             description
               "Generating MAC using SHA1 hash function";
             reference
               "RFC 2404: The Use of HMAC-SHA-1-96 within ESP and AH";
           }
           enum hmac-sha2-224 {
             value 3;
             description
               "Generating MAC using SHA2 hash function";
             reference
               "RFC 6234: US Secure Hash Algorithms
                (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)";
           }
           enum hmac-sha2-256 {
             value 4;
             description
               "Generating MAC using SHA2 hash function";
             reference
               "RFC 6234: US Secure Hash Algorithms
                (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)";
           }
           enum hmac-sha2-256-128 {
             value 5;
             description



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 12]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


               "Generating a 256 bits MAC using SHA2 hash function and
                truncate it to 128 bits";
             reference
               "RFC 4868: Using HMAC-SHA-256, HMAC-SHA-384,
                and HMAC-SHA-512 with IPsec";
           }
           enum hmac-sha2-384 {
             value 6;
             description
               "Generating a 384 bits MAC using SHA2 hash function";
             reference
               "RFC 6234: US Secure Hash Algorithms
                (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)";
           }
           enum hmac-sha2-384-192 {
             value 7;
             description
               "Generating a 384 bits MAC using SHA2 hash function and
                truncate it to 192 bits";
             reference
               "RFC 4868: Using HMAC-SHA-256, HMAC-SHA-384,
                and HMAC-SHA-512 with IPsec";
           }
           enum hmac-sha2-512 {
             value 8;
             description
               "Generating a 512 bits MAC using SHA2 hash function";
             reference
               "RFC 6234: US Secure Hash Algorithms
                (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)";
           }
           enum hmac-sha2-512-256 {
             value 9;
             description
               "Generating a 512 bits MAC using SHA2 hash function and
                truncate it to 256 bits";
             reference
               "RFC 4868: Using HMAC-SHA-256, HMAC-SHA-384,
                and HMAC-SHA-512 with IPsec";
           }
           enum aes-128-gmac {
             value 10;
             description
               "Generating 128-bit MAC using the Advanced Encryption
                Standard (AES) Galois Message Authentication Code
                (GMAC) as a mechanism to provide data origin
                authentication.";
             reference



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 13]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


               "RFC 4543:
                  The Use of Galois Message Authentication Code (GMAC)
                  in IPsec ESP and AH";
           }
           enum aes-192-gmac {
             value 11;
             description
               "Generating 192-bit MAC using the Advanced Encryption
                Standard (AES) Galois Message Authentication Code
                (GMAC) as a mechanism to provide data origin
                authentication.";
             reference
               "RFC 4543:
                  The Use of Galois Message Authentication Code (GMAC)
                  in IPsec ESP and AH";
           }
           enum aes-256-gmac {
             value 12;
             description
               "Generating 256-bit MAC using the Advanced Encryption
                Standard (AES) Galois Message Authentication Code
                (GMAC) as a mechanism to provide data origin
                authentication.";
             reference
               "RFC 4543:
                  The Use of Galois Message Authentication Code (GMAC)
                  in IPsec ESP and AH";
           }
           enum aes-cmac-96 {
             value 13;
             description
               "Generating 96-bit MAC using Advanced Encryption
                Standard (AES) Cipher-based Message Authentication
                Code (CMAC)";
             reference
               "RFC 4494:
                  The AES-CMAC Algorithm and its Use with IPsec";
           }
           enum aes-cmac-128 {
             value 14;
             description
               "Generating 128-bit MAC using Advanced Encryption
                Standard (AES) Cipher-based Message Authentication
                Code (CMAC)";
             reference
               "RFC 4494:
                  The AES-CMAC Algorithm and its Use with IPsec";
           }



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 14]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


           enum sha1-des3-kd {
             value 15;
             description
               "Generating MAC using triple DES encryption function";
             reference
               "RFC 3961:
                  Encryption and Checksum Specifications for Kerberos
                  5";
           }
         }
       }
       default "0";
       description
         "The uint16 filed shall be set by individual protocol
          families according to the mac algorithm value assigned by
          IANA. The setting is optional and by default is 0.  The
          enumeration filed is set to the selected mac algorithm.";
     }

     /********************************************/
     /*   Identities for Encryption Algorithms   */
     /********************************************/

     typedef encryption-algorithm-t {
       type union {
         type uint16;
         type enumeration {
           enum NONE {
             value 0;
             description
               "Encryption algorithm is NULL.";
           }
           enum aes-128-cbc {
             value 1;
             description
               "Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CBC mode with
                a key length of 128 bits.";
             reference
               "RFC 3565: Use of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
                Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax
                (CMS)";
           }
           enum aes-192-cbc {
             value 2;
             description
               "Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CBC mode with
                a key length of 192 bits";
             reference



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 15]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


               "RFC 3565: Use of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
                Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax
                (CMS)";
           }
           enum aes-256-cbc {
             value 3;
             description
               "Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CBC mode with
                a key length of 256 bits";
             reference
               "RFC 3565: Use of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
                Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax
                (CMS)";
           }
           enum aes-128-ctr {
             value 4;
             description
               "Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CTR mode with
                a key length of 128 bits";
             reference
               "RFC 3686:
                  Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Counter
                  Mode with IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload
                  (ESP)";
           }
           enum aes-192-ctr {
             value 5;
             description
               "Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CTR mode with
                a key length of 192 bits";
             reference
               "RFC 3686:
                  Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Counter
                  Mode with IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload
                  (ESP)";
           }
           enum aes-256-ctr {
             value 6;
             description
               "Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CTR mode with
                a key length of 256 bits";
             reference
               "RFC 3686:
                  Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Counter
                  Mode with IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload
                  (ESP)";
           }
           enum des3-cbc-sha1-kd {



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 16]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


             value 7;
             description
               "Encrypt message with 3DES algorithm in CBC mode
                with sha1 function for key derivation";
             reference
               "RFC 3961:
                  Encryption and Checksum Specifications for
                  Kerberos 5";
           }
           enum rc4-hmac {
             value 8;
             description
               "Encrypt message with rc4 algorithm";
             reference
               "RFC 4757:
                  The RC4-HMAC Kerberos Encryption Types Used by
                  Microsoft Windows";
           }
           enum rc4-hmac-exp {
             value 9;
             description
               "Encrypt message with rc4 algorithm that is exportable";
             reference
               "RFC 4757:
                  The RC4-HMAC Kerberos Encryption Types Used by
                  Microsoft Windows";
           }
         }
       }
       default "0";
       description
         "The uint16 filed shall be set by individual protocol
          families according to the encryption algorithm value
          assigned by IANA. The setting is optional and by default
          is 0.  The enumeration filed is set to the selected
          encryption algorithm.";
     }

     /****************************************************/
     /*   Identities for Encryption and MAC Algorithms   */
     /****************************************************/

     typedef encryption-and-mac-algorithm-t {
       type union {
         type uint16;
         type enumeration {
           enum NONE {
             value 0;



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 17]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


             description
               "Encryption and MAC algorithm is NULL.";
             reference
               "None";
           }
           enum aes-128-ccm {
             value 1;
             description
               "Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CCM
                mode with a key length of 128 bits; it can
                also be used for generating MAC";
             reference
               "RFC 4309: Using Advanced Encryption Standard
                (AES) CCM Mode with IPsec Encapsulating Security
                Payload (ESP)";
           }
           enum aes-192-ccm {
             value 2;
             description
               "Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CCM
                mode with a key length of 192 bits; it can
                also be used for generating MAC";
             reference
               "RFC 4309: Using Advanced Encryption Standard
                (AES) CCM Mode with IPsec Encapsulating Security
                Payload (ESP)";
           }
           enum aes-256-ccm {
             value 3;
             description
               "Encrypt message with AES algorithm in CCM
                mode with a key length of 256 bits; it can
                also be used for generating MAC";
             reference
               "RFC 4309: Using Advanced Encryption Standard
                (AES) CCM Mode with IPsec Encapsulating Security
                Payload (ESP)";
           }
           enum aes-128-gcm {
             value 4;
             description
               "Encrypt message with AES algorithm in GCM
                mode with a key length of 128 bits; it can
                also be used for generating MAC";
             reference
               "RFC 4106: The Use of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM)
                in IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)";
           }



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 18]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


           enum aes-192-gcm {
             value 5;
             description
               "Encrypt message with AES algorithm in GCM
                mode with a key length of 192 bits; it can
                also be used for generating MAC";
             reference
               "RFC 4106: The Use of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM)
                in IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)";
           }
           enum aes-256-gcm {
             value 6;
             description
               "Encrypt message with AES algorithm in GCM
                mode with a key length of 256 bits; it can
                also be used for generating MAC";
             reference
               "RFC 4106: The Use of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM)
                in IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)";
           }
           enum chacha20-poly1305 {
             value 7;
             description
               "Encrypt message with chacha20 algorithm and generate
                MAC with POLY1305; it can also be used for generating
                MAC";
             reference
               "RFC 8439: ChaCha20 and Poly1305 for IETF Protocols";
           }
         }
       }
       default "0";
       description
         "The uint16 filed shall be set by individual protocol
          families according to the encryption and mac algorithm value
          assigned by IANA. The setting is optional and by default is
          0.  The enumeration filed is set to the selected encryption
          and mac algorithm.";
     }

     /******************************************/
     /*   Identities for signature algorithm   */
     /******************************************/

     typedef signature-algorithm-t {
       type union {
         type uint16;
         type enumeration {



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 19]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


           enum NONE {
             value 0;
             description
               "Signature algorithm is NULL";
           }
           enum dsa-sha1 {
             value 1;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using DSA algorithm with SHA1
                hash algorithm";
             reference
               "RFC 4253:
                  The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol";
           }
           enum rsassa-pkcs1-sha1 {
             value 2;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 with
                the SHA1 hash algorithm.";
             reference
               "RFC 4253:
                  The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol";
           }
           enum rsassa-pkcs1-sha256 {
             value 3;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 with
                the SHA256 hash algorithm.";
             reference
               "RFC 8332:
                  Use of RSA Keys with SHA-256 and SHA-512 in the
                  Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol
                RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum rsassa-pkcs1-sha384 {
             value 4;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 with
                the SHA384 hash algorithm.";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum rsassa-pkcs1-sha512 {
             value 5;



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 20]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


             description
               "The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 with
                the SHA512 hash algorithm.";
             reference
               "RFC 8332:
                  Use of RSA Keys with SHA-256 and SHA-512 in the
                  Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol
                RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum rsassa-pss-rsae-sha256 {
             value 6;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PSS with mask
                generation function 1 and SHA256 hash algorithm. If
                the public key is carried in an X.509 certificate,
                it MUST use the rsaEncryption OID";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum rsassa-pss-rsae-sha384 {
             value 7;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PSS with mask
                generation function 1 and SHA384 hash algorithm. If
                the public key is carried in an X.509 certificate,
                it MUST use the rsaEncryption OID";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum rsassa-pss-rsae-sha512 {
             value 8;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PSS with mask
                generation function 1 and SHA512 hash algorithm. If
                the public key is carried in an X.509 certificate,
                it MUST use the rsaEncryption OID";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum rsassa-pss-pss-sha256 {



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 21]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


             value 9;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PSS with mask
                generation function 1 and SHA256 hash algorithm. If
                the public key is carried in an X.509 certificate,
                it MUST use the rsaEncryption OID";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum rsassa-pss-pss-sha384 {
             value 10;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PSS with mask
                generation function 1 and SHA384 hash algorithm. If
                the public key is carried in an X.509 certificate,
                it MUST use the rsaEncryption OID";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum rsassa-pss-pss-sha512 {
             value 11;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using RSASSA-PSS with mask
                generation function 1 and SHA512 hash algorithm. If
                the public key is carried in an X.509 certificate,
                it MUST use the rsaEncryption OID";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum ecdsa-secp256r1-sha256 {
             value 12;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using ECDSA with curve name
                secp256r1 and SHA256 hash algorithm.";
             reference
               "RFC 5656:
                  Elliptic Curve Algorithm Integration in the Secure
                  Shell Transport Layer
                RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 22]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


           enum ecdsa-secp384r1-sha384 {
             value 13;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using ECDSA with curve name
                secp384r1 and SHA384 hash algorithm.";
             reference
               "RFC 5656:
                  Elliptic Curve Algorithm Integration in the Secure
                  Shell Transport Layer
                RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum ecdsa-secp521r1-sha512 {
             value 14;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using ECDSA with curve name
                secp521r1 and SHA512 hash algorithm.";
             reference
               "RFC 5656:
                  Elliptic Curve Algorithm Integration in the Secure
                  Shell Transport Layer
                RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum ed25519 {
             value 15;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using EdDSA with curve x25519";
             reference
               "RFC 8032:
                  Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)";
           }
           enum ed25519-cts {
             value 16;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using EdDSA with curve x25519
                with phflag = 0";
             reference
               "RFC 8032:
                  Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)";
           }
           enum ed25519-ph {
             value 17;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using EdDSA with curve x25519
                with phflag = 1";



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 23]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


             reference
               "RFC 8032:
                  Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)";
           }
           enum ed25519-sha512 {
             value 18;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using EdDSA with curve x25519
               and SHA-512 function";
             reference
               "RFC 8419:
                  Use of Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm
                  (EdDSA) Signatures in the Cryptographic Message
                  Syntax (CMS)";
           }
           enum ed448 {
             value 19;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using EdDSA with curve x448";
             reference
               "RFC 8032:
                  Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)";
           }
           enum ed448-ph {
             value 20;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using EdDSA with curve x448
                and with PH being SHAKE256(x, 64) and phflag being 1";
             reference
               "RFC 8032:
                  Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)";
           }
           enum ed448-shake256 {
             value 21;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using EdDSA with curve x448
               and SHAKE-256 function";
             reference
               "RFC 8419:
                  Use of Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm
                  (EdDSA) Signatures in the Cryptographic Message
                  Syntax (CMS)";
           }
           enum ed448-shake256-len {
             value 22;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using EdDSA with curve x448
               and SHAKE-256 function and a customized hash output";



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 24]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


             reference
               "RFC 8419:
                  Use of Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm
                  (EdDSA) Signatures in the Cryptographic Message
                  Syntax (CMS)";
           }
           enum rsa-sha2-256 {
             value 23;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using RSA with SHA2 function
                for SSH protocol";
             reference
               "RFC 8332:
                Use of RSA Keys with SHA-256 and SHA-512
                in the Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol";
           }
           enum rsa-sha2-512 {
             value 24;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using RSA with SHA2 function
                for SSH protocol";
             reference
               "RFC 8332:
                Use of RSA Keys with SHA-256 and SHA-512
                in the Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol";
           }
           enum eccsi {
             value 25;
             description
               "The signature algorithm using ECCSI signature as
                defined in RFC 6507.";
             reference
               "RFC 6507:
                  Elliptic Curve-Based Certificateless Signatures
                  for Identity-based Encryption (ECCSI)";
           }
         }
       }
       default "0";
       description
         "The uint16 filed shall be set by individual protocol
          families according to the signature algorithm value
          assigned by IANA. The setting is optional and by default
          is 0.  The enumeration filed is set to the selected
          signature algorithm.";
     }

     /**********************************************/



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 25]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


     /*   Identities for key exchange algorithms   */
     /**********************************************/

     typedef key-exchange-algorithm-t {
       type union {
         type uint16;
         type enumeration {
           enum NONE {
             value 0;
             description
               "Key exchange algorithm is NULL.";
           }
           enum psk-only {
             value 1;
             description
               "Using Pre-shared key for authentication and key
                exchange";
             reference
               "RFC 4279:
                  Pre-Shared Key cipher suites for Transport Layer
                  Security (TLS)";
           }
           enum dhe-ffdhe2048 {
             value 2;
             description
               "Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with 2048 bit
                finite field";
             reference
               "RFC 7919:
                  Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral
                  Parameters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)";
           }
           enum dhe-ffdhe3072 {
             value 3;
             description
               "Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with 3072 bit
                finite field";
             reference
               "RFC 7919:
                  Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral
                  Parameters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)";
           }
           enum dhe-ffdhe4096 {
             value 4;
             description
               "Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with 4096 bit
                finite field";
             reference



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 26]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


               "RFC 7919:
                  Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral
                  Parameters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)";
           }
           enum dhe-ffdhe6144 {
             value 5;
             description
               "Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with 6144 bit
                finite field";
             reference
               "RFC 7919:
                  Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral
                  Parameters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)";
           }
           enum dhe-ffdhe8192 {
             value 6;
             description
               "Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with 8192 bit
                finite field";
             reference
               "RFC 7919:
                  Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral
                  Parameters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)";
           }
           enum psk-dhe-ffdhe2048 {
             value 7;
             description
               "Key exchange using pre-shared key with Diffie-Hellman
                key generation mechanism, where the DH group is
                FFDHE2048";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum psk-dhe-ffdhe3072 {
             value 8;
             description
               "Key exchange using pre-shared key with Diffie-Hellman
                key generation mechanism, where the DH group is
                FFDHE3072";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum psk-dhe-ffdhe4096 {
             value 9;



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 27]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


             description
               "Key exchange using pre-shared key with Diffie-Hellman
                key generation mechanism, where the DH group is
                FFDHE4096";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum psk-dhe-ffdhe6144 {
             value 10;
             description
               "Key exchange using pre-shared key with Diffie-Hellman
                key generation mechanism, where the DH group is
                FFDHE6144";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum psk-dhe-ffdhe8192 {
             value 11;
             description
               "Key exchange using pre-shared key with Diffie-Hellman
                key generation mechanism, where the DH group is
                FFDHE8192";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum ecdhe-secp256r1 {
             value 12;
             description
               "Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with elliptic
                group over curve secp256r1";
             reference
               "RFC 8422:
                  Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites
                  for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2
                  and Earlier";
           }
           enum ecdhe-secp384r1 {
             value 13;
             description
               "Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with elliptic
                group over curve secp384r1";
             reference



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 28]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


               "RFC 8422:
                  Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites
                  for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2
                  and Earlier";
           }
           enum ecdhe-secp521r1 {
             value 14;
             description
               "Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with elliptic
                group over curve secp521r1";
             reference
               "RFC 8422:
                  Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites
                  for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2
                  and Earlier";
           }
           enum ecdhe-x25519 {
             value 15;
             description
               "Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with elliptic
                group over curve x25519";
             reference
               "RFC 8422:
                  Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites
                  for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2
                  and Earlier";
           }
           enum ecdhe-x448 {
             value 16;
             description
               "Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange with elliptic
                group over curve x448";
             reference
               "RFC 8422:
                  Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites
                  for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2
                  and Earlier";
           }
           enum psk-ecdhe-secp256r1 {
             value 17;
             description
               "Key exchange using pre-shared key with elliptic
                group-based Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange
                over curve secp256r1";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 29]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


           }
           enum psk-ecdhe-secp384r1 {
             value 18;
             description
               "Key exchange using pre-shared key with elliptic
                group-based Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange
                over curve secp384r1";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum psk-ecdhe-secp521r1 {
             value 19;
             description
               "Key exchange using pre-shared key with elliptic
                group-based Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange
                over curve secp521r1";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum psk-ecdhe-x25519 {
             value 20;
             description
               "Key exchange using pre-shared key with elliptic
                group-based Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange
                over curve x25519";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum psk-ecdhe-x448 {
             value 21;
             description
               "Key exchange using pre-shared key with elliptic
                group-based Ephemeral Diffie Hellman key exchange
                over curve x448";
             reference
               "RFC 8446:
                  The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
                  Version 1.3";
           }
           enum diffie-hellman-group14-sha1 {
             value 22;
             description



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 30]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


               "Using DH group14 and SHA1 for key exchange";
             reference
               "RFC 4253:
                  The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol";
           }
           enum diffie-hellman-group14-sha256 {
             value 23;
             description
               "Using DH group14 and SHA-256 for key exchange";
             reference
               "RFC 8268:
                 More Modular Exponentiation (MODP) Diffie-Hellman (DH)
                 Key Exchange (KEX) Groups for Secure Shell (SSH)";
           }
           enum diffie-hellman-group15-sha512 {
             value 24;
             description
               "Using DH group15 and SHA-512 for key exchange";
             reference
               "RFC 8268:
                 More Modular Exponentiation (MODP) Diffie-Hellman (DH)
                 Key Exchange (KEX) Groups for Secure Shell (SSH)";
           }
           enum diffie-hellman-group16-sha512 {
             value 25;
             description
               "Using DH group16 and SHA-512 for key exchange";
             reference
               "RFC 8268:
                 More Modular Exponentiation (MODP) Diffie-Hellman (DH)
                 Key Exchange (KEX) Groups for Secure Shell (SSH)";
           }
           enum diffie-hellman-group17-sha512 {
             value 26;
             description
               "Using DH group17 and SHA-512 for key exchange";
             reference
               "RFC 8268:
                 More Modular Exponentiation (MODP) Diffie-Hellman (DH)
                 Key Exchange (KEX) Groups for Secure Shell (SSH)";
           }
           enum diffie-hellman-group18-sha512 {
             value 27;
             description
               "Using DH group18 and SHA-512 for key exchange";
             reference
               "RFC 8268:
                 More Modular Exponentiation (MODP) Diffie-Hellman (DH)



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 31]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


                 Key Exchange (KEX) Groups for Secure Shell (SSH)";
           }
           enum ecdh-sha2-secp256r1 {
             value 28;
             description
               "Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over
                curve ecp256r1 and using SHA2 for MAC generation";
             reference
               "RFC 6239:
                  Suite B Cryptographic Suites for Secure Shell (SSH)";
           }
           enum ecdh-sha2-secp384r1 {
             value 29;
             description
               "Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over
                curve ecp384r1 and using SHA2 for MAC generation";
             reference
               "RFC 6239:
                  Suite B Cryptographic Suites for Secure Shell (SSH)";
           }
           enum ecdh-x25519-x9.63-sha256 {
             value 30;
             description
               "Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over
                curve x.25519 and using ANSI x9.63 with SHA256 as KDF";
             reference
               "RFC 8418:
                  Use of the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement
                  Algorithm with X25519 and X448 in the Cryptographic
                  Message Syntax (CMS)";
           }
           enum ecdh-x25519-x9.63-sha384 {
             value 31;
             description
               "Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over
                curve x.25519 and using ANSI x9.63 with SHA384 as KDF";
             reference
               "RFC 8418:
                  Use of the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement
                  Algorithm with X25519 and X448 in the Cryptographic
                  Message Syntax (CMS)";
           }
           enum ecdh-x25519-x9.63-sha512 {
             value 32;
             description
               "Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over
                curve x.25519 and using ANSI x9.63 with SHA512 as KDF";
             reference



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 32]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


               "RFC 8418:
                  Use of the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement
                  Algorithm with X25519 and X448 in the Cryptographic
                  Message Syntax (CMS)";
           }
           enum ecdh-x25519-hkdf-sha256 {
             value 33;
             description
               "Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over
                curve x.25519 and using HKDF with SHA256 as KDF";
             reference
               "RFC 8418:
                  Use of the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement
                  Algorithm with X25519 and X448 in the Cryptographic
                  Message Syntax (CMS)";
           }
           enum ecdh-x25519-hkdf-sha384 {
             value 34;
             description
               "Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over
                curve x.25519 and using HKDF with SHA384 as KDF";
             reference
               "RFC 8418:
                  Use of the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement
                  Algorithm with X25519 and X448 in the Cryptographic
                  Message Syntax (CMS)";
           }
           enum ecdh-x25519-hkdf-sha512 {
             value 35;
             description
               "Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over
                curve x.25519 and using HKDF with SHA512 as KDF";
             reference
               "RFC 8418:
                  Use of the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement
                  Algorithm with X25519 and X448 in the Cryptographic
                  Message Syntax (CMS)";
           }
           enum ecdh-x448-x9.63-sha256 {
             value 36;
             description
               "Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over
                curve x.448 and using ANSI x9.63 with SHA256 as KDF";
             reference
               "RFC 8418:
                  Use of the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement
                  Algorithm with X25519 and X448 in the Cryptographic
                  Message Syntax (CMS)";



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 33]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


           }
           enum ecdh-x448-x9.63-sha384 {
             value 37;
             description
               "Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over
                curve x.448 and using ANSI x9.63 with SHA384 as KDF";
             reference
               "RFC 8418:
                  Use of the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement
                  Algorithm with X25519 and X448 in the Cryptographic
                  Message Syntax (CMS)";
           }
           enum ecdh-x448-x9.63-sha512 {
             value 38;
             description
               "Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over
                curve x.448 and using ANSI x9.63 with SHA512 as KDF";
             reference
               "RFC 8418:
                  Use of the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement
                  Algorithm with X25519 and X448 in the Cryptographic
                  Message Syntax (CMS)";
           }
           enum ecdh-x448-hkdf-sha256 {
             value 39;
             description
               "Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over
                curve x.448 and using HKDF with SHA256 as KDF";
             reference
               "RFC 8418:
                  Use of the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement
                  Algorithm with X25519 and X448 in the Cryptographic
                  Message Syntax (CMS)";
           }
           enum ecdh-x448-hkdf-sha384 {
             value 40;
             description
               "Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over
                curve x.448 and using HKDF with SHA384 as KDF";
             reference
               "RFC 8418:
                  Use of the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement
                  Algorithm with X25519 and X448 in the Cryptographic
                  Message Syntax (CMS)";
           }
           enum ecdh-x448-hkdf-sha512 {
             value 41;
             description



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 34]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


               "Elliptic curve-based Diffie Hellman key exchange over
                curve x.448 and using HKDF with SHA512 as KDF";
             reference
               "RFC 8418:
                  Use of the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement
                  Algorithm with X25519 and X448 in the Cryptographic
                  Message Syntax (CMS)";
           }

           enum rsaes-oaep {
             value 42;
             description
               "RSAES-OAEP combines the RSAEP and RSADP primitives with
                the EME-OAEP encoding method";
             reference
               "RFC 8017:
                  PKCS #1:
                    RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
           }
           enum rsaes-pkcs1-v1_5 {
             value 43;
             description
               "RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 combines the RSAEP and RSADP
                primitives with the EME-PKCS1-v1_5 encoding method";
             reference
               "RFC 8017:
                  PKCS #1:
                    RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2.";
           }
         }
       }
       default "0";
       description
         "The uint16 filed shall be set by individual protocol
          families according to the key exchange algorithm value
          assigned by IANA. The setting is optional and by default
          is 0.  The enumeration filed is set to the selected key
          exchange algorithm.";
     }

     /********************************************/
     /*   Identities for Key Format Structures   */
     /********************************************/

     /*** all key format types ****/

     identity key-format-base {
       description "Base key-format identity for all keys.";



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 35]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


     }

     identity public-key-format {
       base "key-format-base";
       description "Base key-format identity for public keys.";
     }

     identity private-key-format {
       base "key-format-base";
       description "Base key-format identity for private keys.";
     }

     identity symmetric-key-format {
       base "key-format-base";
       description "Base key-format identity for symmetric keys.";
     }


     /**** for private keys ****/

     identity rsa-private-key-format {
         base "private-key-format";
         description "An RSAPrivateKey (from RFC 3447).";
     }

     identity ec-private-key-format {
         base "private-key-format";
         description "An ECPrivateKey (from RFC 5915)";
     }

     identity one-asymmetric-key-format {
         base "private-key-format";
         description "A OneAsymmetricKey (from RFC 5958).";
     }

     identity encrypted-private-key-format {
         base "private-key-format";
         description
           "A CMS EncryptedData structure (RFC 5652)
            containing a OneAsymmetricKey (RFC 5958).";
      }


     /**** for public keys ****/

     identity ssh-public-key-format {
         base "public-key-format";
         description



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 36]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


           "The public key format described by RFC 4716.";
     }

     identity subject-public-key-info-format {
         base "public-key-format";
         description
           "A SubjectPublicKeyInfo (from RFC 5280).";
     }


     /**** for symmetric keys ****/

     identity octet-string-key-format {
         base "symmetric-key-format";
         description "An OctetString from ASN.1.";
           /*
           // Knowing that it is an "OctetString" isn't really helpful.
           // Knowing the length of the octet string would be helpful,
           // as it relates to the algorithm's block size.  We may want
           // to only (for now) use "one-symmetric-key-format" for
           // symmetric keys...were the usability issues Juergen
           // mentioned before only apply to asymmetric keys?
           */
     }

     identity one-symmetric-key-format {
         base "symmetric-key-format";
         description "A OneSymmetricKey (from RFC6031).";
     }

     identity encrypted-symmetric-key-format {
         base "symmetric-key-format";
         description
           "A CMS EncryptedData structure (RFC 5652)
            containing a OneSymmetricKey (RFC 6031).";
     }



     /***************************************************/
     /*   Typedefs for ASN.1 structures from RFC 5280   */
     /***************************************************/

     typedef x509 {
       type binary;
       description
         "A Certificate structure, as specified in RFC 5280,
          encoded using ASN.1 distinguished encoding rules (DER),



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 37]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


          as specified in ITU-T X.690.";
       reference
         "RFC 5280:
            Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate
            and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile
          ITU-T X.690:
            Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
            Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
            Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
            Encoding Rules (DER).";
     }

     typedef crl {
       type binary;
       description
         "A CertificateList structure, as specified in RFC 5280,
          encoded using ASN.1 distinguished encoding rules (DER),
          as specified in ITU-T X.690.";
       reference
         "RFC 5280:
            Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate
            and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile
          ITU-T X.690:
            Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
            Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
            Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
            Encoding Rules (DER).";
     }

     /***********************************************/
     /*   Typedefs for ASN.1 structures from 5652   */
     /***********************************************/

     typedef cms {
       type binary;
       description
         "A ContentInfo structure, as specified in RFC 5652,
          encoded using ASN.1 distinguished encoding rules (DER),
          as specified in ITU-T X.690.";
       reference
         "RFC 5652:
            Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
          ITU-T X.690:
            Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
            Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
            Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
            Encoding Rules (DER).";
     }



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 38]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


     typedef data-content-cms {
       type cms;
       description
         "A CMS structure whose top-most content type MUST be the
          data content type, as described by Section 4 in RFC 5652.";
       reference
         "RFC 5652: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
     }

     typedef signed-data-cms {
       type cms;
       description
         "A CMS structure whose top-most content type MUST be the
          signed-data content type, as described by Section 5 in
          RFC 5652.";
       reference
         "RFC 5652: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
     }

     typedef enveloped-data-cms {
       type cms;
       description
         "A CMS structure whose top-most content type MUST be the
          enveloped-data content type, as described by Section 6
          in RFC 5652.";
       reference
         "RFC 5652: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
     }

     typedef digested-data-cms {
       type cms;
       description
         "A CMS structure whose top-most content type MUST be the
          digested-data content type, as described by Section 7
          in RFC 5652.";
       reference
         "RFC 5652: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
     }

     typedef encrypted-data-cms {
       type cms;
       description
         "A CMS structure whose top-most content type MUST be the
          encrypted-data content type, as described by Section 8
          in RFC 5652.";
       reference
         "RFC 5652: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
     }



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 39]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


     typedef authenticated-data-cms {
       type cms;
       description
         "A CMS structure whose top-most content type MUST be the
          authenticated-data content type, as described by Section 9
          in RFC 5652.";
       reference
         "RFC 5652: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)";
     }

     /***************************************************/
     /*   Typedefs for structures related to RFC 4253   */
     /***************************************************/

     typedef ssh-host-key {
       type binary;
       description
         "The binary public key data for this SSH key, as
          specified by RFC 4253, Section 6.6, i.e.:

            string    certificate or public key format
                      identifier
            byte[n]   key/certificate data.";
       reference
         "RFC 4253: The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer
                    Protocol";
     }

     /*********************************************************/
     /*   Typedefs for ASN.1 structures related to RFC 5280   */
     /*********************************************************/

     typedef trust-anchor-cert-x509 {
       type x509;
       description
         "A Certificate structure that MUST encode a self-signed
          root certificate.";
     }

     typedef end-entity-cert-x509 {
       type x509;
       description
         "A Certificate structure that MUST encode a certificate
          that is neither self-signed nor having Basic constraint
          CA true.";
     }

     /*********************************************************/



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 40]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


     /*   Typedefs for ASN.1 structures related to RFC 5652   */
     /*********************************************************/

     typedef trust-anchor-cert-cms {
       type signed-data-cms;
       description
         "A CMS SignedData structure that MUST contain the chain of
          X.509 certificates needed to authenticate the certificate
          presented by a client or end-entity.

          The CMS MUST contain only a single chain of certificates.
          The client or end-entity certificate MUST only authenticate
          to last intermediate CA certificate listed in the chain.

          In all cases, the chain MUST include a self-signed root
          certificate.  In the case where the root certificate is
          itself the issuer of the client or end-entity certificate,
          only one certificate is present.

          This CMS structure MAY (as applicable where this type is
          used) also contain suitably fresh (as defined by local
          policy) revocation objects with which the device can
          verify the revocation status of the certificates.

          This CMS encodes the degenerate form of the SignedData
          structure that is commonly used to disseminate X.509
          certificates and revocation objects (RFC 5280).";
       reference
         "RFC 5280:
            Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate
            and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile.";
     }

     typedef end-entity-cert-cms {
       type signed-data-cms;
       description
         "A CMS SignedData structure that MUST contain the end
          entity certificate itself, and MAY contain any number
          of intermediate certificates leading up to a trust
          anchor certificate.  The trust anchor certificate
          MAY be included as well.

          The CMS MUST contain a single end entity certificate.
          The CMS MUST NOT contain any spurious certificates.

          This CMS structure MAY (as applicable where this type is
          used) also contain suitably fresh (as defined by local
          policy) revocation objects with which the device can



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 41]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


          verify the revocation status of the certificates.

          This CMS encodes the degenerate form of the SignedData
          structure that is commonly used to disseminate X.509
          certificates and revocation objects (RFC 5280).";
       reference
         "RFC 5280:
            Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate
            and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile.";
     }

     typedef ssh-public-key-type {  // DELETE?
        type binary;
        description
          "The binary public key data for this SSH key, as
           specified by RFC 4253, Section 6.6, i.e.:

             string    certificate or public key format
                       identifier
             byte[n]   key/certificate data.";
        reference
          "RFC 4253: The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport
                     Layer Protocol";
     }

     /**********************************************/
     /*   Groupings for keys and/or certificates   */
     /**********************************************/

     grouping symmetric-key-grouping {
       description
         "A symmetric key and algorithm.";
       leaf algorithm {
         type encryption-algorithm-t;
         mandatory true;
         description
           "The algorithm to be used when generating the key.";
         reference
           "RFC CCCC: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
       }
       leaf key-format {
         nacm:default-deny-write;
         when "../key";
         type identityref {
           base symmetric-key-format;
         }
         description "Identifies the symmetric key's format.";
       }



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 42]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


       choice key-type {
         mandatory true;
         description
           "Choice between key types.";
         leaf key {
           nacm:default-deny-all;
           type binary;
           //must "../key-format";  FIXME: remove comment if approach ok
           description
             "The binary value of the key.  The interpretation of
              the value is defined by 'key-format'.  For example,
              FIXME.";
           reference
             "RFC XXXX: FIXME";
         }
         leaf hidden-key {
           nacm:default-deny-write;
           type empty;
           description
             "A permanently hidden key.  How such keys are created
              is outside the scope of this module.";
         }
       }
     }

     grouping public-key-grouping {
       description
         "A public key and its associated algorithm.";
       leaf algorithm {
         nacm:default-deny-write;
         type asymmetric-key-algorithm-t;
         mandatory true;
         description
           "Identifies the key's algorithm.";
         reference
           "RFC CCCC: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
       }
       leaf public-key-format {
         nacm:default-deny-write;
         when "../public-key";
         type identityref {
           base public-key-format;
         }
         description "Identifies the key's format.";
       }
       leaf public-key {
         nacm:default-deny-write;
         type binary;



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 43]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


         //must "../public-key-format"; FIXME: rm comment if approach ok
         mandatory true;
         description
           "The binary value of the public key.  The interpretation
            of the value is defined by 'public-key-format' field.";
       }
     }

     grouping asymmetric-key-pair-grouping {
       description
         "A private key and its associated public key and algorithm.";
       uses public-key-grouping;
       leaf private-key-format {
         nacm:default-deny-write;
         when "../private-key";
         type identityref {
           base private-key-format;
         }
         description "Identifies the key's format.";
       }
       choice private-key-type {
         mandatory true;
         description
           "Choice between key types.";
         leaf private-key {
           nacm:default-deny-all;
           type binary;
           //must "../private-key-format"; FIXME: rm comment if ok
           description
             "The value of the binary key.  The key's value is
              interpreted by the 'private-key-format' field.";
         }
         leaf hidden-private-key {
           nacm:default-deny-write;
           type empty;
           description
             "A permanently hidden key.  How such keys are created
              is outside the scope of this module.";
         }
       }
     }

     grouping trust-anchor-cert-grouping {
       description
         "A trust anchor certificate, and a notification for when
          it is about to (or already has) expire.";
       leaf cert {
         nacm:default-deny-write;



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 44]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


         type trust-anchor-cert-cms;
         description
           "The binary certificate data for this certificate.";
         reference
           "RFC YYYY: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
       }
       notification certificate-expiration {
         description
           "A notification indicating that the configured certificate
            is either about to expire or has already expired.  When to
            send notifications is an implementation specific decision,
            but it is RECOMMENDED that a notification be sent once a
            month for 3 months, then once a week for four weeks, and
            then once a day thereafter until the issue is resolved.";
         leaf expiration-date {
           type yang:date-and-time;
           mandatory true;
           description
             "Identifies the expiration date on the certificate.";
         }
       }
     }

     grouping trust-anchor-certs-grouping {
       description
         "A list of trust anchor certificates, and a notification
          for when one is about to (or already has) expire.";
       leaf-list cert {
         nacm:default-deny-write;
         type trust-anchor-cert-cms;
         description
           "The binary certificate data for this certificate.";
         reference
           "RFC YYYY: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
       }
       notification certificate-expiration {
         description
           "A notification indicating that the configured certificate
            is either about to expire or has already expired.  When to
            send notifications is an implementation specific decision,
            but it is RECOMMENDED that a notification be sent once a
            month for 3 months, then once a week for four weeks, and
            then once a day thereafter until the issue is resolved.";
         leaf expiration-date {
           type yang:date-and-time;
           mandatory true;
           description
             "Identifies the expiration date on the certificate.";



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 45]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


         }
       }
     }

     grouping end-entity-cert-grouping {
       description
         "An end entity certificate, and a notification for when
          it is about to (or already has) expire.  Implementations
          SHOULD assert that, where used, the end entity certificate
          contains the expected public key.";
       leaf cert {
         nacm:default-deny-write;
         type end-entity-cert-cms;
         description
           "The binary certificate data for this certificate.";
         reference
           "RFC YYYY: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
       }
       notification certificate-expiration {
         description
           "A notification indicating that the configured certificate
            is either about to expire or has already expired.  When to
            send notifications is an implementation specific decision,
            but it is RECOMMENDED that a notification be sent once a
            month for 3 months, then once a week for four weeks, and
            then once a day thereafter until the issue is resolved.";
         leaf expiration-date {
           type yang:date-and-time;
           mandatory true;
           description
             "Identifies the expiration date on the certificate.";
         }
       }
     }

     grouping end-entity-certs-grouping {
       description
         "A list of end entity certificates, and a notification for
          when one is about to (or already has) expire.";
       leaf-list cert {
         nacm:default-deny-write;
         type end-entity-cert-cms;
         description
           "The binary certificate data for this certificate.";
         reference
           "RFC YYYY: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
       }
       notification certificate-expiration {



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 46]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


         description
           "A notification indicating that the configured certificate
            is either about to expire or has already expired.  When to
            send notifications is an implementation specific decision,
            but it is RECOMMENDED that a notification be sent once a
            month for 3 months, then once a week for four weeks, and
            then once a day thereafter until the issue is resolved.";
         leaf expiration-date {
           type yang:date-and-time;
           mandatory true;
           description
             "Identifies the expiration date on the certificate.";
         }
       }
     }

     grouping asymmetric-key-pair-with-cert-grouping {
       description
         "A private/public key pair and an associated certificate.
          Implementations SHOULD assert that certificates contain
          the matching public key.";
       uses asymmetric-key-pair-grouping;
       uses end-entity-cert-grouping;
       action generate-certificate-signing-request {
         nacm:default-deny-all;
         description
           "Generates a certificate signing request structure for
            the associated asymmetric key using the passed subject
            and attribute values.  The specified assertions need
            to be appropriate for the certificate's use.  For
            example, an entity certificate for a TLS server
            SHOULD have values that enable clients to satisfy
            RFC 6125 processing.";
         input {
           leaf subject {
             type binary;
             mandatory true;
             description
               "The 'subject' field per the CertificationRequestInfo
                 structure as specified by RFC 2986, Section 4.1
                 encoded using the ASN.1 distinguished encoding
                 rules (DER), as specified in ITU-T X.690.";
             reference
               "RFC 2986:
                  PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax
                            Specification Version 1.7.
                ITU-T X.690:
                  Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 47]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


                  Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
                  Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
                  Encoding Rules (DER).";
           }
           leaf attributes {
             type binary; // FIXME: does this need to be mandatory?
             description
               "The 'attributes' field from the structure
                CertificationRequestInfo as specified by RFC 2986,
                Section 4.1 encoded using the ASN.1 distinguished
                encoding rules (DER), as specified in ITU-T X.690.";
             reference
               "RFC 2986:
                  PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax
                            Specification Version 1.7.
                ITU-T X.690:
                  Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
                  Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
                  Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
                  Encoding Rules (DER).";
           }
         }
         output {
           leaf certificate-signing-request {
             type binary;
             mandatory true;
             description
               "A CertificationRequest structure as specified by
                RFC 2986, Section 4.2 encoded using the ASN.1
                distinguished encoding rules (DER), as specified
                in ITU-T X.690.";
             reference
               "RFC 2986:
                  PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax
                            Specification Version 1.7.
                ITU-T X.690:
                  Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
                  Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
                  Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
                  Encoding Rules (DER).";
           }
         }
       } // generate-certificate-signing-request
     } // asymmetric-key-pair-with-cert-grouping

     grouping asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping {
       description
         "A private/public key pair and associated certificates.



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 48]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


          Implementations SHOULD assert that certificates contain
          the matching public key.";
       uses asymmetric-key-pair-grouping;
       container certificates {
         nacm:default-deny-write;
         description
           "Certificates associated with this asymmetric key.
            More than one certificate supports, for instance,
            a TPM-protected asymmetric key that has both IDevID
            and LDevID certificates associated.";
         list certificate {
           key "name";
           description
             "A certificate for this asymmetric key.";
           leaf name {
             type string;
             description
               "An arbitrary name for the certificate.  If the name
                matches the name of a certificate that exists
                independently in <operational> (i.e., an IDevID),
                then the 'cert' node MUST NOT be configured.";
           }
           uses end-entity-cert-grouping;
         }
       } // certificates
       action generate-certificate-signing-request {
         nacm:default-deny-all;
         description
           "Generates a certificate signing request structure for
            the associated asymmetric key using the passed subject
            and attribute values.  The specified assertions need
            to be appropriate for the certificate's use.  For
            example, an entity certificate for a TLS server
            SHOULD have values that enable clients to satisfy
            RFC 6125 processing.";
         input {
           leaf subject {
             type binary;
             mandatory true;
             description
               "The 'subject' field per the CertificationRequestInfo
                 structure as specified by RFC 2986, Section 4.1
                 encoded using the ASN.1 distinguished encoding
                 rules (DER), as specified in ITU-T X.690.";
             reference
               "RFC 2986:
                  PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax
                            Specification Version 1.7.



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 49]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


                ITU-T X.690:
                  Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
                  Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
                  Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
                  Encoding Rules (DER).";
           }
           leaf attributes {
             type binary; // FIXME: does this need to be mandatory?
             description
               "The 'attributes' field from the structure
                CertificationRequestInfo as specified by RFC 2986,
                Section 4.1 encoded using the ASN.1 distinguished
                encoding rules (DER), as specified in ITU-T X.690.";
             reference
               "RFC 2986:
                  PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax
                            Specification Version 1.7.
                ITU-T X.690:
                  Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
                  Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
                  Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
                  Encoding Rules (DER).";
           }
         }
         output {
           leaf certificate-signing-request {
             type binary;
             mandatory true;
             description
               "A CertificationRequest structure as specified by
                RFC 2986, Section 4.2 encoded using the ASN.1
                distinguished encoding rules (DER), as specified
                in ITU-T X.690.";
             reference
               "RFC 2986:
                  PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax
                            Specification Version 1.7.
                ITU-T X.690:
                  Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
                  Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
                  Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished
                  Encoding Rules (DER).";
           }
         }
       } // generate-certificate-signing-request
     } // asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping
   }




Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 50]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


   <CODE ENDS>

3.  Security Considerations

3.1.  Support for Algorithms

   In order to use YANG identities for algorithm identifiers, only the
   most commonly used RSA key lengths are supported for the RSA
   algorithm.  Additional key lengths can be defined in another module
   or added into a future version of this document.

   This document limits the number of elliptical curves supported.  This
   was done to match industry trends and IETF best practice (e.g.,
   matching work being done in TLS 1.3).  If additional algorithms are
   needed, they can be defined by another module or added into a future
   version of this document.

3.2.  No Support for CRMF

   This document uses PKCS #10 [RFC2986] for the "generate-certificate-
   signing-request" action.  The use of Certificate Request Message
   Format (CRMF) [RFC4211] was considered, but is was unclear if there
   was market demand for it.  If it is desired to support CRMF in the
   future, a backwards compatible solution can be defined at that time.

3.3.  Access to Data Nodes

   The YANG module in this document defines "grouping" statements that
   are designed to be accessed via YANG based management protocols, such
   as NETCONF [RFC6241] and RESTCONF [RFC8040].  Both of these protocols
   have mandatory-to-implement secure transport layers (e.g., SSH, TLS)
   with mutual authentication.

   The NETCONF access control model (NACM) [RFC8341] provides the means
   to restrict access for particular users to a pre-configured subset of
   all available protocol operations and content.

   Since the module in this document only define groupings, these
   considerations are primarily for the designers of other modules that
   use these groupings.

   There are a number of data nodes defined by the grouping statements
   that are writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is
   the default).  Some of these data nodes may be considered sensitive
   or vulnerable in some network environments.  Write operations (e.g.,
   edit-config) to these data nodes without proper protection can have a
   negative effect on network operations.  These are the subtrees and
   data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 51]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


      *: All of the data nodes defined by all the groupings are
         considered sensitive to write operations.  For instance, the
         modification of a public key or a certificate can dramatically
         alter the implemented security policy.  For this reason, the
         NACM extension "default-deny-write" has been applied to all the
         data nodes defined by all the groupings.

   Some of the readable data nodes in the YANG module may be considered
   sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments.  It is thus
   important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or
   notification) to these data nodes.  These are the subtrees and data
   nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:

      /private-key:  The "private-key" node defined in the "asymmetric-
         key-pair-grouping" grouping is additionally sensitive to read
         operations such that, in normal use cases, it should never be
         returned to a client.  For this reason, the NACM extension
         "default-deny-all" has been applied to it here.

   Some of the operations in this YANG module may be considered
   sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments.  It is thus
   important to control access to these operations.  These are the
   operations and their sensitivity/vulnerability:

      *: All of the "action" statements defined by groupings SHOULD only
         be executed by authorized users.  For this reason, the NACM
         extension "default-deny-all" has been applied to all of them.
         Note that NACM uses "default-deny-all" to protect "RPC" and
         "action" statements; it does not define, e.g., an extension
         called "default-deny-execute".

      generate-certificate-signing-request:  For this action, it is
         RECOMMENDED that implementations assert channel binding
         [RFC5056], so as to ensure that the application layer that sent
         the request is the same as the device authenticated when the
         secure transport layer was established.

4.  IANA Considerations

4.1.  The IETF XML Registry

   This document registers one URI in the "ns" subregistry of the IETF
   XML Registry [RFC3688].  Following the format in [RFC3688], the
   following registration is requested:

      URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-crypto-types
      Registrant Contact: The NETCONF WG of the IETF.
      XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 52]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


4.2.  The YANG Module Names Registry

   This document registers one YANG module in the YANG Module Names
   registry [RFC6020].  Following the format in [RFC6020], the the
   following registration is requested:

      name:         ietf-crypto-types
      namespace:    urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-crypto-types
      prefix:       ct
      reference:    RFC XXXX

5.  References

5.1.  Normative References

   [ITU.X690.2015]
              International Telecommunication Union, "Information
              Technology - ASN.1 encoding rules: Specification of Basic
              Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and
              Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)", ITU-T Recommendation
              X.690, ISO/IEC 8825-1, August 2015,
              <https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-X.690/>.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC2404]  Madson, C. and R. Glenn, "The Use of HMAC-SHA-1-96 within
              ESP and AH", RFC 2404, DOI 10.17487/RFC2404, November
              1998, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2404>.

   [RFC3565]  Schaad, J., "Use of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
              Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax
              (CMS)", RFC 3565, DOI 10.17487/RFC3565, July 2003,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3565>.

   [RFC3686]  Housley, R., "Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
              Counter Mode With IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload
              (ESP)", RFC 3686, DOI 10.17487/RFC3686, January 2004,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3686>.

   [RFC4106]  Viega, J. and D. McGrew, "The Use of Galois/Counter Mode
              (GCM) in IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)",
              RFC 4106, DOI 10.17487/RFC4106, June 2005,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4106>.





Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 53]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


   [RFC4253]  Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
              Transport Layer Protocol", RFC 4253, DOI 10.17487/RFC4253,
              January 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4253>.

   [RFC4279]  Eronen, P., Ed. and H. Tschofenig, Ed., "Pre-Shared Key
              Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)",
              RFC 4279, DOI 10.17487/RFC4279, December 2005,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4279>.

   [RFC4309]  Housley, R., "Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) CCM
              Mode with IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)",
              RFC 4309, DOI 10.17487/RFC4309, December 2005,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4309>.

   [RFC4494]  Song, JH., Poovendran, R., and J. Lee, "The AES-CMAC-96
              Algorithm and Its Use with IPsec", RFC 4494,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4494, June 2006,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4494>.

   [RFC4543]  McGrew, D. and J. Viega, "The Use of Galois Message
              Authentication Code (GMAC) in IPsec ESP and AH", RFC 4543,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4543, May 2006,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4543>.

   [RFC4868]  Kelly, S. and S. Frankel, "Using HMAC-SHA-256, HMAC-SHA-
              384, and HMAC-SHA-512 with IPsec", RFC 4868,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4868, May 2007,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4868>.

   [RFC5280]  Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
              Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
              Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
              (CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5280>.

   [RFC5652]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", STD 70,
              RFC 5652, DOI 10.17487/RFC5652, September 2009,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5652>.

   [RFC5656]  Stebila, D. and J. Green, "Elliptic Curve Algorithm
              Integration in the Secure Shell Transport Layer",
              RFC 5656, DOI 10.17487/RFC5656, December 2009,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5656>.

   [RFC6187]  Igoe, K. and D. Stebila, "X.509v3 Certificates for Secure
              Shell Authentication", RFC 6187, DOI 10.17487/RFC6187,
              March 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6187>.




Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 54]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


   [RFC6991]  Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
              RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.

   [RFC7919]  Gillmor, D., "Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman
              Ephemeral Parameters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)",
              RFC 7919, DOI 10.17487/RFC7919, August 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7919>.

   [RFC7950]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
              RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

   [RFC8268]  Baushke, M., "More Modular Exponentiation (MODP) Diffie-
              Hellman (DH) Key Exchange (KEX) Groups for Secure Shell
              (SSH)", RFC 8268, DOI 10.17487/RFC8268, December 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8268>.

   [RFC8332]  Bider, D., "Use of RSA Keys with SHA-256 and SHA-512 in
              the Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol", RFC 8332,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8332, March 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8332>.

   [RFC8341]  Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
              Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.

   [RFC8422]  Nir, Y., Josefsson, S., and M. Pegourie-Gonnard, "Elliptic
              Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for Transport Layer
              Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier", RFC 8422,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8422, August 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8422>.

   [RFC8446]  Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
              Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.

5.2.  Informative References

   [RFC2986]  Nystrom, M. and B. Kaliski, "PKCS #10: Certification
              Request Syntax Specification Version 1.7", RFC 2986,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2986, November 2000,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2986>.



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 55]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


   [RFC3174]  Eastlake 3rd, D. and P. Jones, "US Secure Hash Algorithm 1
              (SHA1)", RFC 3174, DOI 10.17487/RFC3174, September 2001,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3174>.

   [RFC3688]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.

   [RFC4211]  Schaad, J., "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
              Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF)", RFC 4211,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4211, September 2005,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4211>.

   [RFC4493]  Song, JH., Poovendran, R., Lee, J., and T. Iwata, "The
              AES-CMAC Algorithm", RFC 4493, DOI 10.17487/RFC4493, June
              2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4493>.

   [RFC5056]  Williams, N., "On the Use of Channel Bindings to Secure
              Channels", RFC 5056, DOI 10.17487/RFC5056, November 2007,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5056>.

   [RFC5915]  Turner, S. and D. Brown, "Elliptic Curve Private Key
              Structure", RFC 5915, DOI 10.17487/RFC5915, June 2010,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5915>.

   [RFC6020]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
              the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.

   [RFC6125]  Saint-Andre, P. and J. Hodges, "Representation and
              Verification of Domain-Based Application Service Identity
              within Internet Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509
              (PKIX) Certificates in the Context of Transport Layer
              Security (TLS)", RFC 6125, DOI 10.17487/RFC6125, March
              2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6125>.

   [RFC6234]  Eastlake 3rd, D. and T. Hansen, "US Secure Hash Algorithms
              (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)", RFC 6234,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6234, May 2011,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6234>.

   [RFC6239]  Igoe, K., "Suite B Cryptographic Suites for Secure Shell
              (SSH)", RFC 6239, DOI 10.17487/RFC6239, May 2011,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6239>.






Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 56]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


   [RFC6241]  Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
              and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
              (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.

   [RFC6507]  Groves, M., "Elliptic Curve-Based Certificateless
              Signatures for Identity-Based Encryption (ECCSI)",
              RFC 6507, DOI 10.17487/RFC6507, February 2012,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6507>.

   [RFC8017]  Moriarty, K., Ed., Kaliski, B., Jonsson, J., and A. Rusch,
              "PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2",
              RFC 8017, DOI 10.17487/RFC8017, November 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8017>.

   [RFC8032]  Josefsson, S. and I. Liusvaara, "Edwards-Curve Digital
              Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)", RFC 8032,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8032, January 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8032>.

   [RFC8040]  Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
              Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.

   [RFC8340]  Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
              BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.

   [RFC8439]  Nir, Y. and A. Langley, "ChaCha20 and Poly1305 for IETF
              Protocols", RFC 8439, DOI 10.17487/RFC8439, June 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8439>.




















Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 57]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


Appendix A.  Examples

A.1.  The "asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping" Grouping

   The following example module illustrates the use of both the
   "symmetric-key-grouping" and the "asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-
   grouping" groupings defined in the "ietf-crypto-types" module.

   module ex-crypto-types-usage {
     yang-version 1.1;

     namespace "http://example.com/ns/example-crypto-types-usage";
     prefix "ectu";

     import ietf-crypto-types {
       prefix ct;
       reference
         "RFC XXXX: Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography";
     }

     organization
      "Example Corporation";

     contact
      "Author: YANG Designer <mailto:yang.designer@example.com>";

     description
      "This module illustrates the grouping
       defined in the crypto-types draft called
       'asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping'.";

     revision "1001-01-01" {
       description
        "Initial version";
       reference
        "RFC ????: Usage Example for RFC XXXX";
     }

     container symmetric-keys {
       description
         "A container of symmetric keys.";
       list symmetric-key {
         key name;
         description
           "A symmetric key";
         leaf name {
           type string;
           description



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 58]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


             "An arbitrary name for this key.";
         }
         uses ct:symmetric-key-grouping;
       }
     }
     container asymmetric-keys {
       description
         "A container of asymmetric keys.";
       list asymmetric-key {
         key name;
         leaf name {
           type string;
           description
             "An arbitrary name for this key.";
         }
         uses ct:asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping;
         description
           "An asymmetric key pair with associated certificates.";
       }
     }
   }

   Given the above example usage module, the following example
   illustrates some configured keys.

   ========== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per BCP XXX (RFC XXXX) ===========

   <symmetric-keys xmlns="http://example.com/ns/example-crypto-types-us\
   age"
         xmlns:ct="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-crypto-types">
     <symmetric-key>
       <name>ex-symmetric-key</name>
       <algorithm>aes-256-cbc</algorithm>
       <key-format>ct:octet-string-key-format</key-format>
       <key>base64encodedvalue==</key>
     </symmetric-key>
     <symmetric-key>
       <name>ex-hidden-symmetric-key</name>
       <algorithm>aes-256-cbc</algorithm>
       <hidden-key/>
     </symmetric-key>
   </symmetric-keys>

   <asymmetric-keys xmlns="http://example.com/ns/example-crypto-types-u\
   sage"
         xmlns:ct="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-crypto-types">
     <asymmetric-key>
       <name>ex-asymmetric-key</name>



Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 59]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


       <algorithm>rsa2048</algorithm>
       <public-key-format>ct:subject-public-key-info-format</public-key\
   -format>
       <public-key>base64encodedvalue==</public-key>
       <private-key-format>ct:rsa-private-key-format</private-key-forma\
   t>
       <private-key>base64encodedvalue==</private-key>
       <certificates>
         <certificate>
           <name>ex-cert</name>
           <cert>base64encodedvalue==</cert>
         </certificate>
       </certificates>
     </asymmetric-key>
     <asymmetric-key>
       <name>ex-hidden-asymmetric-key</name>
       <algorithm>rsa2048</algorithm>
       <public-key-format>ct:subject-public-key-info-format</public-key\
   -format>
       <public-key>base64encodedvalue==</public-key>
       <hidden-private-key/>
       <certificates>
         <certificate>
           <name>ex-hidden-key-cert</name>
           <cert>base64encodedvalue==</cert>
         </certificate>
       </certificates>
     </asymmetric-key>
   </asymmetric-keys>

A.2.  The "generate-certificate-signing-request" Action

   The following example illustrates the "generate-certificate-signing-
   request" action in use with the NETCONF protocol.

















Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 60]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


   REQUEST

   ========== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per BCP XXX (RFC XXXX) ===========

   <rpc message-id="101"
     xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
     <action xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:1">
       <asymmetric-keys xmlns="http://example.com/ns/example-crypto-typ\
   es-usage">
         <asymmetric-key>
           <name>ex-key-sect571r1</name>
           <generate-certificate-signing-request>
             <subject>base64encodedvalue==</subject>
             <attributes>base64encodedvalue==</attributes>
           </generate-certificate-signing-request>
         </asymmetric-key>
       </asymmetric-keys>
     </action>
   </rpc>

   RESPONSE

   <rpc-reply message-id="101"
      xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
      <certificate-signing-request
        xmlns="http://example.com/ns/example-crypto-types-usage">
        base64encodedvalue==
      </certificate-signing-request>
   </rpc-reply>

A.3.  The "certificate-expiration" Notification

   The following example illustrates the "certificate-expiration"
   notification in use with the NETCONF protocol.

















Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 61]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


   <notification
     xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0">
     <eventTime>2018-05-25T00:01:00Z</eventTime>
     <keys xmlns="http://example.com/ns/example-crypto-types-usage">
       <key>
         <name>locally-defined key</name>
         <certificates>
           <certificate>
             <name>my-cert</name>
             <certificate-expiration>
               <expiration-date>
                 2018-08-05T14:18:53-05:00
               </expiration-date>
             </certificate-expiration>
           </certificate>
         </certificates>
       </key>
     </keys>
   </notification>

Appendix B.  Change Log

B.1.  I-D to 00

   o  Removed groupings and notifications.

   o  Added typedefs for identityrefs.

   o  Added typedefs for other RFC 5280 structures.

   o  Added typedefs for other RFC 5652 structures.

   o  Added convenience typedefs for RFC 4253, RFC 5280, and RFC 5652.

B.2.  00 to 01

   o  Moved groupings from the draft-ietf-netconf-keystore here.

B.3.  01 to 02

   o  Removed unwanted "mandatory" and "must" statements.

   o  Added many new crypto algorithms (thanks Haiguang!)

   o  Clarified in asymmetric-key-pair-with-certs-grouping, in
      certificates/certificate/name/description, that if the name MUST
      NOT match the name of a certificate that exists independently in




Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 62]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


      <operational>, enabling certs installed by the manufacturer (e.g.,
      an IDevID).

B.4.  02 to 03

   o  renamed base identity 'asymmetric-key-encryption-algorithm' to
      'asymmetric-key-algorithm'.

   o  added new 'asymmetric-key-algorithm' identities for secp192r1,
      secp224r1, secp256r1, secp384r1, and secp521r1.

   o  removed 'mac-algorithm' identities for mac-aes-128-ccm, mac-aes-
      192-ccm, mac-aes-256-ccm, mac-aes-128-gcm, mac-aes-192-gcm, mac-
      aes-256-gcm, and mac-chacha20-poly1305.

   o  for all -cbc and -ctr identities, renamed base identity
      'symmetric-key-encryption-algorithm' to 'encryption-algorithm'.

   o  for all -ccm and -gcm identities, renamed base identity
      'symmetric-key-encryption-algorithm' to 'encryption-and-mac-
      algorithm' and renamed the identity to remove the "enc-" prefix.

   o  for all the 'signature-algorithm' based identities, renamed from
      'rsa-*' to 'rsassa-*'.

   o  removed all of the "x509v3-" prefixed 'signature-algorithm' based
      identities.

   o  added 'key-exchange-algorithm' based identities for 'rsaes-oaep'
      and 'rsaes-pkcs1-v1_5'.

   o  renamed typedef 'symmetric-key-encryption-algorithm-ref' to
      'symmetric-key-algorithm-ref'.

   o  renamed typedef 'asymmetric-key-encryption-algorithm-ref' to
      'asymmetric-key-algorithm-ref'.

   o  added typedef 'encryption-and-mac-algorithm-ref'.

   o  Updated copyright date, boilerplate template, affiliation, and
      folding algorithm.

B.5.  03 to 04

   o  ran YANG module through formatter.






Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 63]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


B.6.  04 to 05

   o  fixed broken symlink causing reformatted YANG module to not show.

B.7.  05 to 06

   o  Added NACM annotations.

   o  Updated Security Considerations section.

   o  Added 'asymmetric-key-pair-with-cert-grouping' grouping.

   o  Removed text from 'permanently-hidden' enum regarding such keys
      not being backed up or restored.

   o  Updated the boilerplate text in module-level "description"
      statement to match copyeditor convention.

   o  Added an explanation to the 'public-key-grouping' and 'asymmetric-
      key-pair-grouping' statements as for why the nodes are not
      mandatory (e.g., because they may exist only in <operational>.

   o  Added 'must' expressions to the 'public-key-grouping' and
      'asymmetric-key-pair-grouping' statements ensuring sibling nodes
      are either all exist or do not all exist.

   o  Added an explanation to the 'permanently-hidden' that the value
      cannot be configured directly by clients and servers MUST fail any
      attempt to do so.

   o  Added 'trust-anchor-certs-grouping' and 'end-entity-certs-
      grouping' (the plural form of existing groupings).

   o  Now states that keys created in <operational> by the *-hidden-key
      actions are bound to the lifetime of the parent 'config true'
      node, and that subsequent invocations of either action results in
      a failure.

B.8.  06 to 07

   o  Added clarifications that implementations SHOULD assert that
      configured certificates contain the matching public key.

   o  Replaced the 'generate-hidden-key' and 'install-hidden-key'
      actions with special 'crypt-hash' -like input/output values.






Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 64]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


B.9.  07 to 08

   o  Removed the 'generate-key and 'hidden-key' features.

   o  Added grouping symmetric-key-grouping

   o  Modified 'asymmetric-key-pair-grouping' to have a 'choice'
      statement for the keystone module to augment into, as well as
      replacing the 'union' with leafs (having different NACM settings.

B.10.  08 to 09

   o  Converting algorithm from identities to enumerations.

B.11.  09 to 10

   o  All of the below changes are to the algorithm enumerations defined
      in ietf-crypto-types.

   o  Add in support for key exchange over x.25519 and x.448 based on
      RFC 8418.

   o  Add in SHAKE-128, SHAKE-224, SHAKE-256, SHAKE-384 and SHAKE 512

   o  Revise/add in enum of signature algorithm for x25519 and x448

   o  Add in des3-cbc-sha1 for IPSec

   o  Add in sha1-des3-kd for IPSec

   o  Add in definit for rc4-hmac and rc4-hmac-exp.  These two
      algorithms have been deprecated in RFC 8429.  But some existing
      draft in i2nsf may still want to use them.

   o  Add x25519 and x448 curve for asymmetric algorithms

   o  Add signature algorithms ed25519, ed25519-cts, ed25519ph

   o  add signature algorithms ed448, ed448ph

   o  Add in rsa-sha2-256 and rsa-sha2-512 for SSH protocols (rfc8332)

B.12.  10 to 11

   o  Added a "key-format" identity.

   o  Added symmetric keys to the example in Appendix A.




Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 65]


Internet-Draft   Common YANG Data Types for Cryptography    October 2019


Acknowledgements

   The authors would like to thank for following for lively discussions
   on list and in the halls (ordered by last name): Martin Bjorklund,
   Nick Hancock, Balazs Kovacs, Juergen Schoenwaelder, Eric Voit, and
   Liang Xia.

Authors' Addresses

   Kent Watsen
   Watsen Networks

   EMail: kent+ietf@watsen.net


   Wang Haiguang
   Huawei

   EMail: wang.haiguang.shieldlab@huawei.com
































Watsen & Wang            Expires April 20, 2020                [Page 66]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129d, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/