[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: (draft-bogdanovic-netmod-yang-model-classification) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 RFC 8199

NETMOD                                                     D. Bogdanovic
Internet-Draft
Intended status: Informational                                 B. Claise
Expires: October 6, 2016                                       C. Moberg
                                                     Cisco Systems, Inc.
                                                           April 4, 2016


                       YANG Model Classification
             draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-01

Abstract

   The YANG [RFC6020] data modeling language is currently being
   considered for a wide variety of applications throughout the
   networking industry at large.  Many standards-defining organizations
   (SDOs), open source software projects, vendors and users are using
   YANG to develop and publish models of configuration, state data and
   operations for a wide variety of applications.  At the same time,
   there is currently no well-known terminology to categorize various
   types of YANG models.

   A consistent terminology would help with the categorization of
   models, assist in the analysis the YANG data modeling efforts in the
   IETF and other organizations, and bring clarity to the YANG-related
   discussions between the different groups.

   This document describes a set of concepts and associated terms to
   support consistent classification of YANG models.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on October 6, 2016.





Bogdanovic, et al.       Expires October 6, 2016                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft          YANG Model Classification             April 2016


Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  First Dimension: YANG Model Abstraction Layers  . . . . . . .   3
     2.1.  Network Service YANG Data Models  . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.2.  Network Element YANG Data models  . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   3.  Second Dimension: Model Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     3.1.  Standard YANG Models  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     3.2.  Vendor-specific YANG Models and Extensions  . . . . . . .   6
     3.3.  User-specific YANG Models and Extensions  . . . . . . . .   7
     3.4.  Adding Models to Catalogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     3.5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     3.6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     3.7.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     3.8.  Change log [RFC Editor: Please remove]  . . . . . . . . .   8
   4.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     4.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     4.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9

1.  Introduction

   The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) has been actively
   encouraging IETF working groups to use the NETCONF [RFC6241] and YANG
   standards for configuration management purposes, especially in new
   working group charters [Writable-MIB-Module-IESG-Statement].

   YANG is also gaining wide acceptance as the de-facto standard
   modeling language in the broader industry.  This extends beyond the
   IETF, including many standards development organizations, industry
   consortia, ad hoc groups, open source projects, vendors, and end-
   users.




Bogdanovic, et al.       Expires October 6, 2016                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft          YANG Model Classification             April 2016


   There are currently no clear guidelines on how to classify the
   layering of YANG models according to abstraction, or how to classify
   models along the continuum spanning formal standards publications,
   vendor-specific models and models provided by end-users.

   This document presents a set of concepts and terms to form a useful
   taxonomy for consistent classification of YANG models in two
   dimensions:

   o  The layering of models based on their abstraction levels

   o  The type of model based on the nature and intent of the content

   The two categories are covered in the next two sections.

2.  First Dimension: YANG Model Abstraction Layers

   Model developers have taken two approaches to developing YANG models:
   top-down and bottom-up.  The top-down approach starts with high level
   abstractions modeling business or customer requirements and maps them
   to specific networking technologies.  The bottom-up approach starts
   with fundamental networking technologies and maps them into more
   abstract constructs.

   There are currently no specific requirements on, or well-defined best
   practices around the development of models.  For the purpose of this
   document we assume that both approaches (bottom-up and top-down) will
   be used as they both provide benefits that appeal to different
   groups.

   For layering purposes, this document suggests the classification of
   data models into two distinct abstraction layers:

   o  Network Element YANG Models describe the configuration, state data
      and operations of specific device-centric technologies or features

   o  Network Service YANG Models describe the configuration, state data
      and operations of an abstract representation of a service
      implemented on one or multiple network elements

   Figure 1 illustrates the application of YANG models at different
   layers of abstraction.  Layering of models allows for reusability of
   existing lower layer models by higher level models while limiting
   duplication of features across layers.

   For model developers, per-layer modeling allows for separation of
   concern across editing teams focusing on specific areas.




Bogdanovic, et al.       Expires October 6, 2016                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft          YANG Model Classification             April 2016


   As an example, experience from the IETF shows that creating useful
   network element YANG models for e.g. routing or switching protocols
   requires teams that include developers with experience of
   implementing those protocols.

   On the other hand, network service models are best developed by
   people experienced in defining network services for consumption by
   programmers developing e.g. flow-through provisioning systems or
   self-service portals.


                       +--------------------------+
                       |  Operations and Business |
                       |      Support Systems     |
                       |        (OSS/BSS)         |
                       +--------------------------+

       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
       Network Service YANG data models

            +------------+      +-------------+      +-------------+
            |            |      |             |      |             |
            |  - VPWS    |      |   - VPLS    |      |    L3VPN    |
            |  - L2VPN   |      |   - L2VPN   |      |             |
            |            |      |             |      |             |
            +------------+      +-------------+      +-------------+

       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
       Network Element YANG data models

       +------------+  +------------+  +-------------+  +------------+
       |            |  |            |  |             |  |            |
       |    MPLS    |  |    BGP     |  | IPv4 & IPv6 |  |  Ethernet  |
       |            |  |            |  |             |  |            |
       +------------+  +------------+  +-------------+  +------------+

       Fig. 1 YANG Model Layers


2.1.  Network Service YANG Data Models

   Network Service YANG Data Models describe the characteristics of a
   service, as agreed upon with consumers of that service.  That is, a
   service model does not expose the detailed configuration parameters
   of all participating network elements and features, but describes an
   abstract model that allows instances of the service to be decomposed
   into instance data according to the Network Element data models of
   the participating network elements.  The service-to-element



Bogdanovic, et al.       Expires October 6, 2016                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft          YANG Model Classification             April 2016


   decomposition is a separate process with details depending on how the
   network operator chooses to realize the service.  For the purpose of
   this document we will use the term "orchestrator" to describe a
   system implementing such a process.

   As an example, the Network Service model included in
   [YANG-Data-Model-for-L3VPN-service-delivery] provides an abstracted
   model for Layer 3 IP VPN service configuration.  An orchestrator
   receives operations on service instances according to the service
   model and decomposes the data into specific Network Element models to
   configure the participating network elements to perform the intent of
   the service.

   Network Service YANG models define services models to be consumed by
   external systems.  These models are commonly designed, developed and
   deployed by network infrastructure teams.

   YANG allows for different design patterns to describe network
   services, ranging from monolithic to component-based approaches.

   The monolithic approach captures the entire service in a single model
   and does not put focus on reusability of internal data definitions
   and groupings.  The monolithic approach has the advantages of single-
   purpose development including speed at the expense of reusability.

   The component-based approach captures device-centric features (e.g.
   the definition of a VRF, routing protocols, or packet filtering) in a
   vendor-independent manner.  The components are designed for reuse
   across many services.  The set of components required for a specific
   service is then composed into the higher-level service.  The
   component-based approach has the advantages of modular development
   including a higher degree of reusability at the expense of initial
   speed.

   As an example, an L2VPN service can be built on many different types
   of transport network technologies, including e.g.  MPLS or carrier
   ethernet.  A component-based approach would allow for reuse of e.g.
   UNI-interface definitions independent of the underlying transport
   network (e.g.  MEF UNI interface or MPLS interface).  The monolithic
   approach would assume a specific set of transport technologies and
   interface definitions.

2.2.  Network Element YANG Data models

   Network Element YANG Data Models describe the configuration, state
   data and operations of a network device as defined by the vendor of
   that device.  The models are commonly structured around features of
   the device, e.g. interface configuration [RFC7223], OSPF



Bogdanovic, et al.       Expires October 6, 2016                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft          YANG Model Classification             April 2016


   configuration [I-D.ietf-ospf-yang], and firewall rules definitions
   [I-D.ietf-netmod-acl-model].  The model provides a coherent data
   model representation of what is commonly a very mixed software
   environment consisting of the operating system and applications
   running on the device.

   The decomposition, ordering, and execution of changes to the
   operating system and application configuration is the task of the
   management framework that implements the YANG model.

3.  Second Dimension: Model Types

   This document suggests classifying YANG model types as either
   standard YANG models, vendor-specific YANG models and extensions, and
   user-specific YANG models and extensions

   The suggested classification applies to both Network Element YANG
   Data Models and Network Service YANG Data Models.

   It is to be expected that real-world implementations of both Network
   Service and Network Element models will include a mix of all three
   types of models.

3.1.  Standard YANG Models

   Standard YANG models are published by standards-defining
   organizations (SDOs).  While there is no formal definition of what
   construes an SDO, a common feature is that they publish
   specifications along specific processes with content that reflects
   some sort of membership consensus.  The specifications are developed
   for wide use among the membership or for audiences beyond that.

   The lifecycle of these models is driven by the editing cycle of the
   specification and not tied to a specific implementation.

   Examples of SDOs in the networking industry are the IETF, the IEEE
   and the MEF.

3.2.  Vendor-specific YANG Models and Extensions

   Vendor-specific YANG models are developed by organizations with the
   intent to support a specific set of implementations under control of
   that organization.  The intent of these models range from providing
   openly published YANG models that may eventually be contributed back
   to, or adopted by an SDO, to strictly internal YANG models not
   intended for external consumption.





Bogdanovic, et al.       Expires October 6, 2016                [Page 6]


Internet-Draft          YANG Model Classification             April 2016


   The lifecycle of these models are generally aligned with the release
   cycle of the product or open source software project deliverables.

   It is worth noting that there is an increasing amount of interaction
   between open source projects and SDOs in the networking industry.
   This includes open source projects implementing published standards
   as well as open source projects contributing content to SDO
   processes.

   Vendors also develop Vendor-specific Extensions to standard models
   using YANG constructs for extending data definitions of previously
   published models.  This is done using the 'augment' statement that
   allows locally defined data trees to be augmented into locations in
   externally defined data trees.

   Vendors use this to extend standard data models to cover the full
   scope of features in implementations, which commonly is broader than
   what is covered by the standard model.

3.3.  User-specific YANG Models and Extensions

   User-specific YANG models are developed by organizations that operate
   YANG-based infrastructure including devices and orchestrators.  The
   intent of these models is to express the specific needs for a certain
   implementation, above and beyond what is provided by vendors.

   This model type obviously requires the infrastructure to support the
   introduction of user-provided models and extensions.  This would
   include ability to describe the service-to-network decomposition in
   orchestrators and the model to configuration decomposition in
   devices.

   The lifecycle of these models are generally aligned with the change
   cadence of the infrastructure.

3.4.  Adding Models to Catalogs

   The suggested classification in this document supports the creation
   of catalogs, such as proposed in
   [I-D.openconfig-netmod-model-catalog].  Such catalogs allows for easy
   lookup and reusability of YANG models.  SDO-classified models also
   provide an educational resource providing architectural guidelines
   for model development, based on a membership reviewn and consensus.








Bogdanovic, et al.       Expires October 6, 2016                [Page 7]


Internet-Draft          YANG Model Classification             April 2016


3.5.  Security Considerations

   At this stage, authors of the draft didn't look into security
   considerations.

3.6.  IANA Considerations

   This document requests no action by IANA.

3.7.  Acknowledgements

   Thanks to David Ball and David Hansford for feedback and suggestions.

3.8.  Change log [RFC Editor: Please remove]

   version 00: Renamed and small fixes based on WG feedback.

   version 01: Language fixes, collapsing of vendor models and
   extensions, and the introduction of user models and extensions.

   version 02: Added two sections, Model Catalog and Benefits of model
   classification.

4.  References

4.1.  Normative References

   [RFC6020]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
              the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.

4.2.  Informative References

   [I-D.ietf-netmod-acl-model]
              Bogdanovic, D., Koushik, K., Huang, L., and D. Blair,
              "Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model",
              draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-07 (work in progress), March
              2016.

   [I-D.ietf-ospf-yang]
              Yeung, D., Qu, Y., Zhang, J., Bogdanovic, D., and K.
              Koushik, "Yang Data Model for OSPF Protocol", draft-ietf-
              ospf-yang-04 (work in progress), March 2016.







Bogdanovic, et al.       Expires October 6, 2016                [Page 8]


Internet-Draft          YANG Model Classification             April 2016


   [I-D.openconfig-netmod-model-catalog]
              D'Souza, K., Shaikh, A., and R. Shakir, "Catalog and
              registry for YANG models", draft-openconfig-netmod-model-
              catalog-00 (work in progress), October 2015.

   [RFC6241]  Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
              and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
              (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.

   [RFC7223]  Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface
              Management", RFC 7223, DOI 10.17487/RFC7223, May 2014,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7223>.

   [Writable-MIB-Module-IESG-Statement]
              "Writable MIB Module IESG Statement",
              <https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/writable-mib-
              module.html>.

   [YANG-Data-Model-for-L3VPN-service-delivery]
              "YANG Data Model for L3VPN service delivery",
              <https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-l3vpn-service-yang>.

Authors' Addresses

   Dean Bogdanovic

   Email: ivandean@gmail.com


   Benoit Claise
   Cisco Systems, Inc.

   Email: bclaise@cisco.com


   Carl Moberg
   Cisco Systems, Inc.

   Email: camoberg@cisco.com











Bogdanovic, et al.       Expires October 6, 2016                [Page 9]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129d, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/