[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: (draft-naik-nfsv4-xattrs) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 RFC 8276

NFSv4 Working Group                                              M. Naik
Internet Draft                                                   Nutanix
Intended Status: Standards Track                                M. Eshel
Expires: September 8, 2016                                   IBM Almaden
                                                           March 7, 2016


                File System Extended Attributes in NFSv4
                       draft-ietf-nfsv4-xattrs-02


Abstract

   This document proposes extensions to the NFSv4 protocol which allow
   file extended attributes (hereinafter also referred to as xattrs) to
   be manipulated using NFSv4.  An xattr is a file system feature that
   allows opaque metadata, not interpreted by the file system, to be
   associated with files and directories.  Such support is present in
   many modern local file systems.  New file attributes are proposed to
   allow clients to query the server for xattr support, and new
   operations to get and set xattrs on file system objects are provided.


Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as
   Internet-Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html


Copyright and License Notice

   Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the



Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016                [Page 1]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   document authors. All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document. Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.



Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
     1.1.  Terminology  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   2.  Use Cases  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
   3.  File System Support  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
   4.  Namespaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
   5.  Differences from Named Attributes  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   6.  XDR Description  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
     6.1.  Code Components Licensing Notice . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
   7.  Protocol Extensions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
     7.1.  New definitions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
     7.2.  New Attribute  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
       7.2.1.  xattr_support  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
     7.3.  New Error Definitions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
       7.3.1.  NFS4ERR_NOXATTR (Error Code 10095) . . . . . . . . . . 11
       7.3.2.  NFS4ERR_XATTR2BIG (Error Code 10096) . . . . . . . . . 11
     7.4.  New Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
       7.4.1.  GETXATTR - Get an extended attribute of a file . . . . 12
       7.4.2.  SETXATTR - Set an extended attribute of a file . . . . 14
       7.4.3.  LISTXATTRS - List extended attributes of a file  . . . 15
       7.4.4.  REMOVEXATTR - Remove an extended attribute of a file . 17
       7.4.5.  Valid Errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
     7.5.  Modifications to Existing Operations . . . . . . . . . . . 19
     7.6.  Numeric Values Assigned to Protocol Extensions . . . . . . 21
     7.7.  Caching  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
     7.8.  Xattrs and File Locking  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
     7.9.  pNFS Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
   8.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
   9.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
   10.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
     10.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
     10.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
   Appendix A.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27



Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016                [Page 2]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28


















































Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016                [Page 3]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


1.  Introduction

   Extended attributes, also called xattrs, are a means to associate
   opaque metadata with file system objects, typically organized in
   key/value pairs.  They are especially useful when they add
   information that is not, or cannot be, present in the associated
   object itself.  User-space applications can arbitrarily create,
   interrogate, and modify the key/value pairs.

   Extended attributes are file system-agnostic; applications use an
   interface not specific to any file system to manipulate them.
   Applications do not need to be concerned about how the key/value
   pairs are stored internally within the underlying file system.  All
   major operating systems provide various flavors of extended
   attributes.  Many user space tools allow xattrs to be included in
   regular attributes that need to be preserved when objects are
   updated, moved or copied.

   Extended attributes have previously been considered unsuitable for
   portable use because some aspects of their handling are not precisely
   defined and they are not formally documented by any standard (such as
   POSIX).  Nevertheless, it appears that xattrs are widely deployed and
   their support in modern disk-based file systems is nearly universal.

   There is no clear specification of how xattrs could be mapped to any
   existing file attributes defined in the NFSv4 protocol ([RFC7530],
   [RFC5661], [NFSv42]).  As a result, most NFSv4 client implementations
   ignore application-specified xattrs.  This state of affairs results
   in data loss if one copies, over the NFS protocol, a file with xattrs
   from one file system to another that also supports xattrs.

   There is thus a need to provide a means by which such data loss can
   be avoided.  This will involve exposing xattrs within the NFSv4
   protocol, despite the lack of completely compatible file system
   implementations.

   This document discusses (in Section 5) the reasons that NFSv4 named
   attributes as currently standardized in [RFC7530], are unsuitable for
   representing xattrs.  Instead, it proposes a separate protocol
   mechanism to support xattrs.  As a consequence, xattrs and named
   attributes will both be optional features with servers free to
   support either, both, or neither.

1.1.  Terminology

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].



Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016                [Page 4]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   In this document, these words will appear with that interpretation
   only when in ALL CAPS. Lower case uses of these words are not to be
   interpreted as carrying RFC-2119 significance.

2.  Use Cases

   Applications can store tracking information in extended attributes.
   Examples include storing metadata identifying the application that
   created the file, a tag to indicate when the file was last verified
   by a data integrity scrubber, or a tag to hold a checksum/crypto hash
   of the file contents along with the date of that signature.  Xattrs
   can also be used for decorations or annotations.  For example, a file
   downloaded from a web server can be tagged with the URL, which can be
   convenient if its source has to be determined in the future.
   Likewise, an email attachment, when saved, can be tagged with the
   message-id of the email, making it possible to trace the original
   message.

   Applications may need to behave differently when handling files of
   varying types.  For example, file managers, such as GNOME's, offer
   unique icons, different click behavior, and special lists of
   operations to perform depending on the file format.  This can be
   achieved by looking at the file extension (Windows), or interpret the
   type by inspecting it (Unix MIME type).  Some file managers generate
   this information on the fly; others generate the information once and
   then cache it.  Those that cache the information tend to put it in a
   custom database.  The file manager must work to keep this database in
   sync with the files, which can change without the file manager's
   knowledge.  A better approach is to dispense with the custom database
   and store such metadata in extended attributes.  This is easier to
   maintain, provides faster access, and is readily accessible by
   applications [Love].

   Swift, the OpenStack distributed object store, uses xattrs to store
   an object's metadata along with all the data together in one file.
   Swift-on-File [Swift] transfers the responsibility of maintaining
   object durability and availability to the underlying file system.
   Today, this requires a native file system client to mount the
   volumes.  Xattr support in NFS would open up the possibility of
   storing and consuming data from other storage systems, and facilitate
   the migration of data between different backend storage systems.

   Baloo, the file indexing and search framework for KDE, has moved to
   storing metadata such as tags, ratings and comments, in file system
   xattrs instead of a custom database for simplicity.  Starting with
   KDE Plasma 5.1, NFS is no longer supported due to its lack of xattr
   support [KDE].




Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016                [Page 5]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


3.  File System Support

   Extended attributes are supported by most modern file systems.

   In Linux, ext3, ext4, JFS, XFS, Btrfs, among other file systems,
   support extended attributes.  The getfattr and setfattr utilities can
   be used to retrieve and set xattrs.  The names of the extended
   attributes must be prefixed by the name of the category and a dot;
   hence these categories are generally qualified as name spaces.
   Currently, four namespaces exist: user, trusted, security and system
   [Linux].  Recommendations on how they should be used have been
   published [freedesktop].

   FreeBSD supports extended attributes in two universal namespaces -
   user and system, although individual file systems are allowed to
   implement additional namespaces [FreeBSD].

   Solaris 9 and later allows files to have extended attributes, but
   implements them as "forks", logically represented as files within a
   hidden directory that is associated with the target file [fsattr].

   In the NTFS file system, extended attributes are one of several
   supported "file streams" [NTFS].

   Xattrs can be retrieved and set through system calls or shell
   commands and are generally supported by user-space tools that
   preserve other file attributes.  For example, the "rsync" remote copy
   program will correctly preserve user extended attributes between
   Linux/ext4 and OSX/hfs by stripping off the Linux-specific "user."
   prefix.

4.  Namespaces

   Operating systems may define multiple "namespaces" in which xattrs
   can be set.  Namespaces are more than organizational classes; the
   operating system may enforce different access policies and allow
   different capabilities depending on the namespace.  Linux, for
   example, defines "security", "system", "trusted" and "user"
   namespaces, the first three being specific to Linux [freedesktop].

   Implementations generally agree on the semantics of a "user"
   namespace, that allows applications to store arbitrary user attribute
   data with file system objects.  Access to this namespace is
   controlled via the normal file system attributes.  As such, getting
   and setting xattrs from the user namespace can be considered
   interoperable across platforms and vendor implementations.
   Attributes from other namespaces are typically platform-specific.




Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016                [Page 6]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   This document provides for namespaces supporting user-managed
   metadata only, thus avoiding the need to specify the semantics
   applicable to particular system-interpreted xattrs.  The values of
   xattrs are considered application data just as the contents of named
   attributes, files, and symbolic links are.  Servers have a
   responsibility to store whatever value the client specifies and to
   return it on demand. xattr keys and values MUST NOT be interpreted by
   the NFS clients and servers, as such behavior would lead to non-
   interoperable implementations.  If there is a need to specify
   attributes that servers need to be act upon, the appropriate
   semantics need to be specified by adding a new attribute for the
   purpose as provided by [RFC7530] and [NFSv4-vers].

5.  Differences from Named Attributes

   [RFC7530] defines named attributes as opaque byte streams that are
   associated with a directory or file and referred to by a string name.
    Named attributes are intended to be used by client applications as a
   method to associate application-specific data with a regular file or
   directory.  In that sense, xattrs are similar in concept and use to
   named attributes, but there are subtle differences.

   File systems typically define operations to get and set individual
   xatrrs as being atomic, although  collectively they may be
   independent.  Xattrs generally have size limits ranging from a few
   bytes to several kilobytes; the maximum supported size is not
   universally defined and is usually restricted by the file system.
   Similar to ACLs, the amount of xattr data exchanged between the
   client and server for get/set operations can be considered to fit in
   a single COMPOUND request, bounded by the channel's negotiated
   maximum size for requests.  Named attributes, on the other hand, are
   unbounded data streams and do not impose atomicity requirements.

   Individual named attributes are analogous to files, and caching of
   the data for these needs to be handled just as data caching is for
   ordinary files following close-to-open semantics.  Xattrs, on the
   other hand, impose caching requirements like other file attributes.

   Named attributes and xattrs have different semantics and belong to
   disjoint namespaces.  As a result, mapping one to another is, at
   best, a compromise.

   While it should be possible to write guidance about how a client can
   use the named attribute mechanism to act like xattrs, such as carving
   out some namespace and specifying locking primitives to enforce
   atomicity constraints on individual get/set operations, this is
   problematic.  A client application trying to use xattrs through named
   attributes with a server that supported xattrs directly would get a



Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016                [Page 7]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   lower level of service, and could fail to cooperate on a local
   application running on the server unless the server file system
   defined its own interoperability constraints.  File systems that
   already implement xattrs and named attributes natively would need
   additional guidance such as reserving named attribute namespace
   specifically for implementation purposes.

6.  XDR Description

   This document contains the external data representation (XDR)
   [RFC4506] description of the extended attributes.  The XDR
   description is embedded in this document in a way that makes it
   simple for the reader to extract into a ready-to-compile form.  The
   reader can feed this document into the following shell script to
   produce the machine readable XDR description of extended attributes:

   <CODE BEGINS>

   #! /bin/sh
   grep '^ *///' $* | sed 's?^ */// ??' | sed 's?^ *///$??'

   <CODE ENDS>

   That is, if the above script is stored in a file called "extract.sh",
   and this document is in a file called "spec.txt", then the reader can
   do:

   sh extract.sh < spec.txt > xattr_prot.x

   The effect of the script is to remove leading white space from each
   line, plus a sentinel sequence of "///".

   The embedded XDR file header follows.  Subsequent XDR descriptions,
   with the sentinel sequence are embedded throughout the document.

   Note that the XDR code contained in this document depends on types
   from the proposed NFSv4.2 nfs4_prot.x file [NFSv42-dot-x].  This
   includes both nfs types that end with a 4, such as verifier4, count4,
   etc., as well as more generic types such as opaque and bool.

6.1.  Code Components Licensing Notice

   Both the XDR description and the scripts used for extracting the XDR
   description are Code Components as described in Section 4 of "Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents" [LEGAL].  These Code
   Components are licensed according to the terms of that document.





Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016                [Page 8]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   <CODE BEGINS>

   /// /*
   ///  * Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified
   ///  * as authors of the code.  All rights reserved.
   ///  *
   ///  * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with
   ///  * or without modification, are permitted provided that the
   ///  * following conditions are met:
   ///  *
   ///  * o Redistributions of source code must retain the above
   ///  *   copyright notice, this list of conditions and the
   ///  *   following disclaimer.
   ///  *
   ///  * o Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
   ///  *   copyright notice, this list of conditions and the
   ///  *   following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other
   ///  *   materials provided with the distribution.
   ///  *
   ///  * o Neither the name of Internet Society, IETF or IETF
   ///  *   Trust, nor the names of specific contributors, may be
   ///  *   used to endorse or promote products derived from this
   ///  *   software without specific prior written permission.
   ///  *
   ///  *   THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS
   ///  *   AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
   ///  *   WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
   ///  *   IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS
   ///  *   FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO
   ///  *   EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
   ///  *   LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,
   ///  *   EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT
   ///  *   NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR
   ///  *   SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
   ///  *   INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
   ///  *   LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY,
   ///  *   OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING
   ///  *   IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF
   ///  *   ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
   ///  *
   ///  * This code was derived from RFCTBD10.
   ///  * Please reproduce this note if possible.
   ///  */

   /// /*
   ///  * xattr_prot.x
   ///  */




Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016                [Page 9]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   /// /*
   ///  * The following include statements are for example only.
   ///  * The actual XDR definition files are generated separately
   ///  * and independently and are likely to have a different name.
   ///  * %#include <nfsv42.x>
   ///  * %#include <rpc_prot.x>
   ///  */

   <CODE ENDS>

7.  Protocol Extensions

   This section documents extensions to the NFSv4 protocol operations to
   allow xattrs to be queried and modified by clients.  A new attribute
   is added to allow clients to check if the server supports xattrs.
   New operations are defined to allow xattr keys and values to be
   queried and set.  In addition, new bitmask constants are added to the
   ACE access mask field to validate permissions to query and modify
   xattrs.

   These changes follow applicable guidelines for valid NFSv4 protocol
   extension, whether the extensions occur in a minor version (as
   specified in [RFC5661]) or as an extension to an existing minor
   version (as specified in [NFSv4-vers]).

7.1.  New definitions

   <CODE BEGINS>

   /// typedef component4     xattrkey4;
   /// typedef opaque         xattrvalue4<>;

   <CODE ENDS>

   Each xattr is a key/value pair.  xattrkey4 is a string denoting the
   xattr key name, and an attrvalue4 which is a variable-length string
   that identifies the value of the xattr.  The handling of xattrkey4
   with regard to internationalization-related issues is the same as
   that for NFSv4 file names and named attribute names, as described in
   [RFC7530].  Any regular file or directory may have a set of extended
   attributes, each consisting of a key and associated value.  The NFS
   client or server MUST NOT interpret the contents of xattrkey4 or
   xattrvalue4.

7.2.  New Attribute

   The following RECOMMENDED per-fs read-only attribute is proposed for
   use.  A client can query the server to determine if xattrs are



Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 10]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   supported by setting the xattr_support bit in the GETATTR request.

7.2.1.  xattr_support

   True, if the object's file system supports extended attributes.

   Since xattr_support is not a REQUIRED attribute, server need not
   support it.  However, a client may reasonably assume that a server
   (or file system) that does not support the xattr_support attribute
   does not provide xattr support and act on that basis.

   Note that the protocol does not enforce any limits on the number of
   keys, the length of a key or the size of a value, or the total size
   of xattrs that are allowed for a file.  The server file system MAY
   impose additional limits.  In addition, a single xattr key or value
   exchanged between the client and server for get/set operations is
   limited by the channel's negotiated maximum size for requests and
   responses.

7.3.  New Error Definitions

   <CODE BEGINS>

   /// /* Following lines are to be added to enum nfsstat4 */
   /// /*
   ///  NFS4ERR_NOXATTR        = 10095 /* xattr does not exist    */
   ///  NFS4ERR_XATTR2BIG      = 10096 /* xattr value is too big  */
   /// */

   <CODE ENDS>

7.3.1.  NFS4ERR_NOXATTR (Error Code 10095)

   The specified xattr does not exist or the server is unable to
   retrieve it.

7.3.2.  NFS4ERR_XATTR2BIG (Error Code 10096)

   The size of the xattr value as part of a SETXATTR operation is bigger
   than that supported by the underlying file system.

7.4.  New Operations

   Individual xattrs generally represent separate items of metadata.
   For various reasons, combining them into a single attribute results
   in clumsy implementations with significant functional deficits.  In
   consequence, adding a new attribute to represent the set of xattrs
   for an object is not an appropriate way to provide support for



Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 11]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   xattrs.

   For example, obtaining the value of a single xattr using the bitmap
   would require a client implementation to read all the xattrs of the
   file and find a match for the one requested.  Similarly, replacing or
   deleting a single xattr while keeping the others intact would require
   a client to read the xattrs first, replacing the existing list with a
   modified list that excludes the one to be deleted, and writing out
   the remaining xattrs.  Such a read-modify-write cycle is subject to
   updates being lost in the case of simultaneous updates by multiple
   clients.  In addition, two clients might simultaneously add the same
   xattr key to the same file with each concluding that it did the
   initial creation for the common xattr key, when the semantic model
   implies that only one could have done so.

   Applications need to perform the following operations on a given
   file's extended attributes [Love]:

   o  Given a file, return a list of all of the file's assigned extended
      attribute keys.

   o  Given a file and a key, return the corresponding value.

   o  Given a file, a key, and a value, assign that value to the key.

   o  Given a file and a key, remove that extended attribute from the
      file.

   This section introduces four new RECOMMENDED operations, GETXATTR,
   SETXATTR, LISTXATTRS and REMOVEXATTR, to query, set, list and remove
   xattrs respectively.  A server MUST support all four operations if it
   supports the xattr_support attribute. GETXATTR allows obtaining the
   value of an xattr key, SETXATTR allows creating or replacing an xattr
   key with a value, LISTXATTRS enumerates all the xattrs names, and
   REMOVEXATTR allows deleting a single xattr.

7.4.1.  GETXATTR - Get an extended attribute of a file

7.4.1.1.  ARGUMENTS

   <CODE BEGINS>

   /// struct GETXATTR4args {
   ///         /* CURRENT_FH: file */
   ///         xattrkey4     gxa_name;
   /// };

   <CODE ENDS>



Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 12]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


7.4.1.2.  RESULTS

   <CODE BEGINS>

   /// union GETXATTR4res switch (nfsstat4 gxr_status) {
   ///  case NFS4_OK:
   ///         xattrvalue4   gxr_value;
   ///  default:
   ///         void;
   /// };

   <CODE ENDS>

7.4.1.3.  DESCRIPTION

   The GETXATTR operation will obtain the value for the given extended
   attribute key for the file system object specified by the current
   filehandle.

   The server will fetch the xattr value for the key that the client
   requests if xattrs are supported by the server for the target file
   system.  If the server does not support xattrs on the target file
   system, then it MUST NOT return a value and MUST return the
   NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP error.  The server also MUST return NFS4ERR_NOXATTR
   if it supports xattrs on the target but cannot obtain the requested
   data.  If the xattr value contained in the server response is such as
   to cause the channel's negotiated maximum response size to be
   exceeded, then the server MUST return NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG in
   gxr_status.

7.4.1.4.  IMPLEMENTATION

   Clients that have cached an xattr may avoid the need to do a GETXATTR
   by determining if the change attribute is the same as it was when the
   xattr was fetched.  If the client does not hold a delegation for the
   file in question, it can do so with a GETATTR request to obtain the
   change attribute and comparing its value to the change attribute
   value fetched when the xattr value was obtained.  This handling is
   similar to how a client would revalidate other file attributes such
   as ACLs.

   When responding to such a GETATTR, the server will, if there is an
   OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation held by another client for the file in
   question, either obtain the actual current value of these attributes
   from the client holding the delegation by using the CB_GETATTR
   callback, or revoke the delegation.  See Section 18.7.4 of [RFC5661]
   for details.




Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 13]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


7.4.2.  SETXATTR - Set an extended attribute of a file

7.4.2.1.  ARGUMENTS

   <CODE BEGINS>

   /// enum setxattr_option4 {
   ///         SETXATTR4_NONE        = 0,
   ///         SETXATTR4_CREATE      = 1,
   ///         SETXATTR4_REPLACE     = 2,
   /// };

   /// struct SETXATTR4args {
   ///         /* CURRENT_FH: file */
   ///         setxattr_option4 sxa_option;
   ///         xattrkey4        sxa_key;
   ///         xattrvalue4      sxa_value;
   /// };

   <CODE ENDS>

7.4.2.2.  RESULTS

   <CODE BEGINS>

   /// struct SETXATTR4res switch (nfsstat4 sxr_status) {
   ///  case NFS4_OK:
   ///         change_info4      sxr_info;
   ///  default:
   ///         void;
   /// };

   <CODE ENDS>

7.4.2.3.  DESCRIPTION

   The SETXATTR operation changes one extended attribute of a file
   system object.  The change desired is specified by sxa_option.
   SETXATTR4_CREATE is used to associate the given value with the given
   extended attribute key for the file system object specified by the
   current filehandle.  The server MUST return NFS4ERR_EXIST if the
   attribute key already exists.  SETXATTR4_REPLACE is also used to set
   an xattr, but the server MUST return NFS4ERR_NOXATTR if the attribute
   key does not exist.  By default (SETXATTR4_NONE), the extended
   attribute will be created if need be, or its value will be replaced
   if the attribute exists.

   If the xattr key and value contained in the client request are such



Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 14]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   that the request would exceed the channel's negotiated maximum
   request size, then the server MUST return NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG in
   sxr_status.  If the server file system imposes additional limits on
   the size of key name or value, it MAY return NFS4ERR_XATTR2BIG.

   A successful SETXATTR MUST change the file time_metadata and change
   attributes if the xattr is created or the value assigned to xattr
   changes.  However, these attributes SHOULD NOT be changed if this
   causes no actual change in the xattr value.

   On success, the server returns the change_info4 information in
   sxr_info.  With the atomic field of the change_info4 data type, the
   server will indicate if the before and after change attributes were
   obtained atomically with respect to the SETXATTR operation.  This
   allows the client to determine if its cached xattrs are still valid
   after the operation.  See Section 7.6 for a discussion on xattr
   caching.

7.4.2.4.  IMPLEMENTATION

   If the object whose xattr is being changed has a file delegation that
   is held by a client other than the one doing the SETXATTR, the
   delegation(s) must be recalled, and the operation cannot proceed to
   actually change the xattr until each such delegation is returned or
   revoked.  In all cases in which delegations are recalled, the server
   is likely to return one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors while the
   delegation(s) remains outstanding, although it might not do that if
   the delegations are returned quickly.

7.4.3.  LISTXATTRS - List extended attributes of a file

7.4.3.1.  ARGUMENTS

   <CODE BEGINS>

   /// struct LISTXATTRS4args {
   ///         /* CURRENT_FH: file */
   ///         nfs_cookie4    lxa_cookie;
   ///         verifier4      lxa_cookieverf;
   ///         count4         lxa_maxcount;
   /// };

   <CODE ENDS>

7.4.3.2.  RESULTS






Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 15]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   <CODE BEGINS>

   /// struct LISTXATTRS4resok {
   ///         nfs_cookie4    lxr_cookie;
   ///         verifier4      lxr_cookieverf;
   ///         xattrkey4      lxr_names<>;
   ///         bool           lxr_eof;
   /// };

   /// union LISTXATTRS4res switch (nfsstat4 lxr_status) {
   ///  case NFS4_OK:
   ///         LISTXATTRS4resok  lxr_value;
   ///  default:
   ///         void;
   /// };

   <CODE ENDS>

7.4.3.3.  DESCRIPTION

   The LISTXATTRS operation retrieves a variable number of extended
   attribute keys from the file system object specified by the current
   filehandle, along with information to allow the client to request
   additional attribute keys in a subsequent LISTXATTRS.

   The arguments contain a cookie value that represents where the
   LISTXATTRS should start within the list of xattrs.  A value of 0
   (zero) for lxa_cookie is used to start reading at the beginning of
   the list.  For subsequent LISTXATTRS requests, the client specifies a
   cookie value that is provided by the server on a previous LISTXATTRS
   request.

   The lxa_cookieverf value should be set to 0 (zero) when the
   lxa_cookie value is 0 (zero) (first xattr read).  On subsequent
   requests, it should be lxr_cookieverf as returned by the server.  The
   lxa_cookieverf must match that returned by the LISTXATTRS in which
   the cookie was acquired.  If the server determines that the
   lxa_cookieverf is no longer valid for the list, the error
   NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME must be returned.

   The lxa_maxcount value of the argument is the maximum number of bytes
   for the result.  This maximum size represents all of the data being
   returned within the LISTXATTRS4resok structure and includes the XDR
   overhead.  The server may return less data.  If the server is unable
   to return a single xattr name within the maxcount limit, the error
   NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL will be returned to the client.

   On successful return, the server's response will provide a list of



Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 16]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   extended attribute keys.  The "lxr_eof" flag has a value of TRUE if
   there are no more keys for the object.

   The cookie value is only meaningful to the server and is used as a
   "bookmark" for the xattr key.  As mentioned, this cookie is used by
   the client for subsequent LISTXATTRS operations so that it may
   continue listing keys.  The cookie is similar in concept to a READDIR
   cookie or the READ offset but should not be interpreted as such by
   the client.

   On success, the current filehandle retains its value.

7.4.3.4.  IMPLEMENTATION

   The handling of cookie/verifier is similar to that of the READDIR
   operation.  The verifier may be used by the server to help manage
   cookie values that may become stale.  It should be a rare occurrence
   that a server is unable to continue properly listing xattrs with the
   provided cookie/verifier pair.  The server should make every effort
   to avoid this condition since the application at the client may not
   be able to properly handle this type of failure.

7.4.4.  REMOVEXATTR - Remove an extended attribute of a file

7.4.4.1.  ARGUMENTS

   <CODE BEGINS>

   /// struct REMOVEXATTR4args {
   ///         /* CURRENT_FH: file */
   ///         xattrkey4      rxa_name;
   /// };

   <CODE ENDS>

7.4.4.2.  RESULTS

   <CODE BEGINS>

   /// struct REMOVEXATTR4res switch (nfsstat4 rxr_status) {
   ///  case NFS4_OK:
   ///         change_info4      rxr_info;
   ///  default:
   ///         void;
   /// };

   <CODE ENDS>




Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 17]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


7.4.4.3.  DESCRIPTION

   The REMOVEXATTR operation deletes one extended attribute of a file
   system object specified by rxa_name.  The server MUST return
   NFS4ERR_NOXATTR if the attribute key does not exist.

   A successful REMOVEXATTR SHOULD change the file time_metadata and
   change attributes.

   Similar to SETXATTR, the server communicates the value of the change
   attribute immediately prior to, and immediately following, a
   successful REMOVEXATTR operation in rxr_info.  This allows the client
   to determine if its cached xattrs are still valid after the
   operation.  See Section 7.6 for a discussion on xattr caching.

7.4.4.4.  IMPLEMENTATION

   If the object whose xattr is being removed has a file delegation that
   is held by a client other than the one doing the REMOVEXATTR, the
   delegation(s) must be recalled, and the operation cannot proceed to
   delete the xattr until each such delegation is returned or revoked.
   In all cases in which delegations are recalled, the server is likely
   to return one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors while the delegation(s)
   remains outstanding, although it might not do that if the delegations
   are returned quickly.

7.4.5.  Valid Errors

   This section contains a table that gives the valid error returns for
   each new protocol operation.  The error code NFS4_OK (indicating no
   error) is not listed but should be understood to be returnable by all
   new operations.  The error values for all other operations are
   defined in Section 13.2 of [RFC7530].

          Valid Error Returns for Each New Protocol Operation

   +----------------------+--------------------------------------------+
   | Operation            | Errors                                     |
   +----------------------+--------------------------------------------+
   | GETXATTR             | NFS4ERR_ACCESS, NFS4ERR_BADXDR,            |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION, NFS4ERR_DELAY,        |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED, NFS4ERR_INVAL,          |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_IO, NFS4ERR_MOVED,                 |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG, NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE, |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP, NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,|
   |                      | NFS4ERR_PERM, NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,         |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,              |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,                       |



Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 18]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   |                      | NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,                |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT, NFS4ERR_STALE,        |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS, NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE   |
   | SETXATTR             | NFS4ERR_ACCESS, NFS4ERR_BADCHAR,           |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_BADXDR, NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,       |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_DELAY, NFS4ERR_DQUOT,              |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_EXIST, NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,          |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_INVAL, NFS4ERR_IO, NFS4ERR_MOVED,  |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG, NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE, |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_NOSPC, NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,  |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_PERM, NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,         |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,              |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,                       |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP, NFS4ERR_ROFS,  |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT, NFS4ERR_STALE,        |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS, NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE   |
   | LISTXATTRS           | NFS4ERR_ACCESS, NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,       |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_DELAY, NFS4ERR_INVAL, NFS4ERR_IO,  |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_MOVED, NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG,        |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE, NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,     |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,                 |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_PERM, NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,         |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,              |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,                       |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,                |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT, NFS4ERR_STALE,        |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS, NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE   |
   | REMOVEXATTR          | NFS4ERR_ACCESS, NFS4ERR_BADCHAR,           |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_BADXDR, NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,       |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_DELAY, NFS4ERR_DQUOT,              |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_EXIST, NFS4ERR_INVAL, NFS4ERR_IO,  |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_LOCKED, NFS4ERR_MOVED,             |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG, NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE, |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_NOSPC, NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,        |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_OPENMODE,                          |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION, NFS4ERR_PERM,   |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP, NFS4ERR_ROFS,  |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT, NFS4ERR_STALE,        |
   |                      | NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS, NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE   |
   +----------------------+--------------------------------------------+

7.5.  Modifications to Existing Operations

   In order to provide fine-grained access control to query or modify
   extended attributes, additions are proposed to the set of access
   rights that can be checked to determine if the client is permitted to
   perform the xattr operation.




Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 19]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   Note that in general, as explained in Section 18.1.4 of [RFC5661], a
   client cannot reliably perform an access check with only current file
   attributes and must verify access with the server.

   This section extends the semantics of the ACCESS operation documented
   in Section 18.1 of [RFC5661].  Three new access permissions can be
   requested:

   ACCESS4_XAREAD     Query a file or directory for its xattr value
                      given a key.

   ACCESS4_XAWRITE    Modify xattr keys and/or values of a file or
                      directory.

   ACCESS4_XALIST     Query a file or directory to list its xattr keys.

   As with the existing access permissions, the results of ACCESS are
   advisory in nature, with no implication that such access will be
   allowed or denied in the future.

   In addition, two new bitmask constants used for the access mask field
   are added:

   ACE4_READ_XATTRS   Permission to interrogate the extended attributes
                      of a file with GETXATTR.

   ACE4_WRITE_XATTRS  Permission to change the extended attributes of a
                      file with SETXATTR or REMOVEXATTR.

   ACE4_LIST_XATTRS   Permission to list the extended attributes of a
                      file with LISTXATTRS.


   The rules for the client and server follow:

   o  If the client is sending ACCESS in order to determine if the user
      can read an xattr of the file with GETXATTR, the client SHOULD set
      ACCESS4_XAREAD in the request's access field.

   o  If the client is sending ACCESS in order to determine if the user
      can modify an xattr of the file with SETXATTR or REMOVEXATTR, the
      client SHOULD set ACCESS4_XAWRITE in the request's access field.

   o  If the client is sending ACCESS in order to determine if the user
      can list the xattr keys of the file with LISTXATTRS, the client
      SHOULD set ACCESS4_XALIST in the request's access field.

   o  If the server supports the ACE4_READ_XATTRS permission bit, it



Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 20]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


      MUST only check for it in the mode, acl, and dacl attributes when
      it receives an ACCESS request with ACCESS4_XAREAD set in the
      access field.

   o  If the server supports the ACE4_WRITE_XATTRS permission bit, it
      MUST only check for it in the mode, acl, and dacl attributes when
      it receives an ACCESS request with ACCESS4_XAWRITE set in the
      access field.

   o  If the server supports the ACE4_LIST_XATTRS permission bit, it
      MUST only check for it in the mode, acl, and dacl attributes when
      it receives an ACCESS request with ACCESS4_XALIST set in the
      access field.

   Server implementations need not provide the granularity of control
   that is implied by this list of masks.  For example, POSIX-based
   systems might not distinguish ACE4_XAREAD from ACE4_READ_ATTRIBUTES
   (or ACE4_READ_DATA); both masks would be tied to a single "stat" (or
   "read") permission.  When such a server returns attributes to the
   client, it would show both ACE4_READ_ATTRIBUTES (or ACE4_READ_DATA)
   and ACE4_XAREAD if and only if the stat (or read) permission is
   enabled.

   If a server receives a SETXATTR request that it cannot accurately
   implement, it should err in the direction of more restricted access.
   For example, suppose a server supports xattrs, but cannot distinguish
   modifying attributes from updating xattr.  If a client submits an
   ALLOW ACE where ACE4_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES is set but ACE4_WRITE_XATTR is
   not (or vice versa), the server should either turn off
   ACE4_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES or reject the request with NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP.

7.6.  Numeric Values Assigned to Protocol Extensions

   This section lists the numeric values assigned new attributes and
   operations to implement the xattr feature.  To avoid inconsistent
   assignments, these have been checked against the most recent protocol
   version [RFC5661], the current minor version [NFSv42], and all
   extensions currently approved as working group documents.
   Development of interoperable prototypes should be possible using
   these values, although it is possible that these values may be
   modified before eventual publication as a standard-track document.

   <CODE BEGINS>








Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 21]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   /// /*
   ///  * ACCESS - Check Access Rights
   ///  */
   /// const ACCESS4_XAREAD    = 0x00000040;
   /// const ACCESS4_XAWRITE   = 0x00000080;
   /// const ACCESS4_XALIST    = 0x00000100;

   /// /*
   ///  * ACE mask values
   ///  */
   /// const ACE4_READ_XATTRS        = 0x00200000;
   /// const ACE4_WRITE_XATTRS       = 0x00400000;
   /// const ACE4_LIST_XATTRS        = 0x00800000;

   /// /*
   ///  * New NFSv4 attribute
   ///  */
   /// typedef bool            fattr4_xattr_support;

   /// /*
   ///  * New RECOMMENDED Attribute
   ///  */
   /// const FATTR4_XATTR_SUPPORT = 81;

   /// /*
   ///  * New NFSv4 operations
   /// */
   /// /* Following lines are to be added to enum nfs_opnum4 */
   /// /*
   /// OP_GETXATTR                = 72,
   /// OP_SETXATTR                = 73,
   /// OP_LISTXATTRS              = 74,
   /// OP_REMOVEXATTR             = 75,
   /// */

   <CODE ENDS>

7.7.  Caching

   The caching behavior for extended attributes is similar to other file
   attributes such as ACLs and is affected by whether OPEN delegation
   has been granted to a client or not.

   Xattrs obtained from, or sent to, the server may be cached and
   clients can use them to avoid subsequent GETXATTR requests, provided
   that the client can ensure that the cached value has not been
   subsequently modified by another client.  Such assurance can depend
   on the client holding a delegation for the file in question or the



Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 22]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   client interrogating the change attribute to make sure that any
   cached value is still valid.  Such caching may be read-only or write-
   through.

   When a delegation is in effect, some operations by a second client to
   a delegated file will cause the server to recall the delegation
   through a callback.  For individual operations, we describe, under
   IMPLEMENTATION, when such operations are required to effect a recall.

   The result of local caching is that the individual xattrs maintained
   on clients may not be up-to-date.  Changes made in one order on the
   server may be seen in a different order on one client and in a third
   order on another client.  In order to limit problems that may arise
   due to separate operations to obtain individual xattrs and other file
   attributes, a client should treat xattrs just like other file
   attributes with respect to caching as detailed in section 10.6 of
   [RFC7530].  A client may validate its cached version of an xattr for
   a file by fetching the change attribute and assuming that if the
   change attribute has the same value as it did when the attributes
   were cached, then xattrs have not changed.  If the client holds a
   delegation that ensures that the change attribute cannot be modified
   by another client, that it can dispense with actual interrogation of
   the change attribute.

   When a client is changing xattrs of a file, it needs to determine
   whether there have been changes made to the file by other clients.
   It does this by using the change attribute as reported before and
   after the change operation (SETXATTR or REMOVEXATTR) in the
   associated change_info4 value returned for the operation.  The server
   is able to communicate to the client whether the change_info4 data is
   provided atomically with respect to the change operation.  If the
   change values are provided atomically, the client has a basis for
   determining, given proper care, whether other clients are modifying
   the file in question.

   The simplest way to enable the client to make this determination is
   for the client to serialize all xattr changes made to a specific
   file.  When this is done, and the server provides before and after
   values of the change attribute atomically, the client can simply
   compare the after value of the change attribute from one operation
   with the before value on the subsequent change operation modifying
   the file.  When these are equal, the client is assured that no other
   client is modifying the file in question.

   If the comparison indicates that the file was updated by another
   client, the xattr cache associated with the modified file is purged
   from the client.  If the comparison indicates no modification, the
   xattr cache can be updated on the client to reflect the file



Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 23]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   operation and the associated timeout can be extended.  The post-
   operation change value needs to be saved as the basis for future
   change_info4 comparisons.

   Xattr caching requires that the client revalidate xattr cache data by
   inspecting the change attribute of a file at the point when an xattr
   was cached.  This requires that the server update the change
   attribute when xattrs are modified.  For a client to use the
   change_info4 information appropriately and correctly, the server must
   report the pre- and post-operation change attribute values
   atomically.  When the server is unable to report the before and after
   values atomically with respect to the xattr update operation, the
   server must indicate that fact in the change_info4 return value.
   When the information is not atomically reported, the client should
   not assume that other clients have not changed the xattrs.

   The protocol does not provide support for write-back caching of
   xattrs.  As such, all modifications to xattrs should be done by
   requests to the server.  The server should perform such updates
   synchronously.

7.8.  Xattrs and File Locking

   Xattr operations, for the most part, function independent of
   operations related to file locking state.  For example, xattrs can be
   interrogated and modified without a corresponding OPEN operation.
   The server does not need to check for locks that conflict with xattr
   access or modify operations.  For example, another OPEN specified
   with OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_READ or OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH does not prevent
   access to or modification of xattrs.  Note that the server MUST still
   verify that the client is allowed to perform the xattr operation on
   the basis of ACE access permissions.

   However, the presence of delegations may dictate how xattr operations
   interact with the state-related logic.  Xattrs cannot be modified
   when a delegation for the corresponding file is held by another
   client.  On the other hand, xattrs can be interrogated despite the
   holding of a write delegation by another client since updates are
   write-through to the server.

7.9.  pNFS Considerations

   All xattr operations are sent to the metadata server, which is
   responsible for fetching data from and effecting necessary changes to
   persistent storage.






Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 24]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


8.  Security Considerations

   Since xattrs are application data, security issues are exactly the
   same as those relating to the storing of file data and named
   attributes.  These are all various sorts of application data and the
   fact that the means of reference is slightly different in each case
   should not be considered security-relevant.  As such, the additions
   to the NFS protocol for supporting extended attributes do not alter
   the security considerations of the NFSv4.2 protocol [NFSv42].

9.  IANA Considerations

   The addition of xattr support to the NFSv4 protocol does not require
   any actions by IANA.  This document limits xattr names to the user
   namespace, where application developers are allowed to define and use
   attributes as needed.  Unlike named attributes, there is no namespace
   identifier associated with xattrs that may require registration.


































Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 25]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


10.  References

10.1.  Normative References

   [LEGAL]    IETF Trust, "Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents",
              November 2008, <http://trustee.ietf.org/docs/IETF-Trust-
              License-Policy.pdf>.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI
              10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <http://www.rfc-
              editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC4506]  Eisler, M., Ed., "XDR: External Data Representation
              Standard", STD 67, RFC 4506, DOI 10.17487/RFC4506, May
              2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4506>.

   [RFC5661]  Shepler, S., Ed., Eisler, M., Ed., and D. Noveck, Ed.,
              "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1
              Protocol", RFC 5661, DOI 10.17487/RFC5661, January 2010,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5661>.

   [RFC5662]  Shepler, S., Ed., Eisler, M., Ed., and D. Noveck, Ed.,
              "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1
              External Data Representation Standard (XDR) Description",
              RFC 5662, DOI 10.17487/RFC5662, January 2010,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5662>.


   [RFC7530]  Haynes, T. and D. Noveck, "Network File System (NFS)
              Version 4 Protocol", RFC 7530, March 2015.

10.2.  Informative References

   [NFSv42]   Haynes, T., Ed., "NFS Version 4 Minor Version 2", January
              2016, <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-nfsv4-
              minorversion2-41.txt>.

              Work in progress.

   [NFSv42-dot-x]
              Haynes, T., Ed., "NFS Version 4 Minor Version 2 Protocol
              External Data Representation Standard (XDR) Description",
              January 2016, <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-nfsv4-
              minorversion2-dot-x-41.txt>.

              Work in progress.




Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 26]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


   [NFSv4-vers]
              D. Noveck, "NFSv4 Version Management", January 2016,
              <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-nfsv4-versioning-
              03.txt>.

              Work in progress.

   [freedesktop]
              "Guidelines for extended attributes",
              <http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/CommonExtendedAttributes>.

   [Linux]    "Linux Programmer's Manual: xattr(7)",
              <http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/xattr.7.html>.

   [Love]     Love, R., "Linux System Programming: Talking Directly to
              the Kernel and C Library", O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2007.

   [FreeBSD]  "FreeBSD Man Pages - extattr",
              <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=extattr&sektion=9>.

   [fsattr]   "Oracle Man Pages - fsattr",
              <http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/816-5175/6mbba7f02>.


   [NTFS]     "File Streams", <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-
              us/library/windows/desktop/aa364404(v=vs.85).aspx>.

   [Swift]    "Swift-on-File",
              <https://github.com/stackforge/swiftonfile>.

   [KDE]      Handa, V., "KDE Planet",
              <http://vhanda.in/blog/2014/08/extended-attributes-
              updates/>.

Appendix A.  Acknowledgements

   This draft has attempted to capture the discussion on adding xattrs
   to the NFSv4 protocol from many participants on the IETF NFSv4
   mailing list.  Those who provided valuable input and comments on
   earlier revisions of this draft include: Tom Haynes, Christoph
   Hellwig, Nico Williams, Dave Noveck, Benny Halevy and Andreas
   Gruenbacher.









Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 27]


Internet Draft        Extended Attributes in NFSv4         March 7, 2016


Authors' Addresses

   Manoj Naik
   Nutanix
   1740 Technology Drive, Suite 150,
   San Jose, CA 95110
   Email: manoj.naik@nutanix.com

   Marc Eshel
   IBM Almaden
   650 Harry Rd
   San Jose, CA 95120
   Phone: +1 408-927-1894
   Email: eshel@us.ibm.com





































Naik & Eshel           Expires September 8, 2016               [Page 28]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129c, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/