[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: (draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 RFC 8362

Network Working Group                                          A. Lindem
Internet-Draft                                                    A. Roy
Updates: 5340, 5838 (if approved)                          Cisco Systems
Intended status: Standards Track                             D. Goethals
Expires: July 29, 2018                                             Nokia
                                                         V. Reddy Vallem

                                                                F. Baker
                                                        January 25, 2018


                        OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility
                draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-23.txt

Abstract

   OSPFv3 requires functional extension beyond what can readily be done
   with the fixed-format Link State Advertisement (LSA) as described in
   RFC 5340.  Without LSA extension, attributes associated with OSPFv3
   links and advertised IPv6 prefixes must be advertised in separate
   LSAs and correlated to the fixed-format LSAs.  This document extends
   the LSA format by encoding the existing OSPFv3 LSA information in
   Type-Length-Value (TLV) tuples and allowing advertisement of
   additional information with additional TLVs.  Backward compatibility
   mechanisms are also described.

   This document updates RFC 5340, "OSPF for IPv6", and RFC 5838,
   "Support of Address Families in OSPFv3" by providing TLV-based
   encodings for the base OSPFv3 unicast support and OSPFv3 address
   family support.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on July 29, 2018.




Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                 [Page 1]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     1.1.  Requirements notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     1.2.  OSPFv3 LSA Terminology  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   2.  OSPFv3 Extended LSA Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   3.  OSPFv3 Extended LSA TLVs  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     3.1.  Prefix Options Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
       3.1.1.  N-bit Prefix Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     3.2.  Router-Link TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     3.3.  Attached-Routers TLV  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     3.4.  Inter-Area-Prefix TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     3.5.  Inter-Area-Router TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     3.6.  External-Prefix TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
     3.7.  Intra-Area-Prefix TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     3.8.  IPv6 Link-Local Address TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
     3.9.  IPv4 Link-Local Address TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
     3.10. IPv6-Forwarding-Address Sub-TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     3.11. IPv4-Forwarding-Address Sub-TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     3.12. Route-Tag Sub-TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
   4.  OSPFv3 Extended LSAs  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
     4.1.  OSPFv3 E-Router-LSA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
     4.2.  OSPFv3 E-Network-LSA  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
     4.3.  OSPFv3 E-Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
     4.4.  OSPFv3 E-Inter-Area-Router-LSA  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  21
     4.5.  OSPFv3 E-AS-External-LSA  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  22
     4.6.  OSPFv3 E-NSSA-LSA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  23
     4.7.  OSPFv3 E-Link-LSA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  24
     4.8.  OSPFv3 E-Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  26
   5.  Malformed OSPFv3 Extended LSA Handling  . . . . . . . . . . .  27
   6.  LSA Extension Backward Compatibility  . . . . . . . . . . . .  27
     6.1.  Full Extended LSA Migration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  27
     6.2.  Extended LSA Sparse-Mode Backward Compatibility . . . . .  28



Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                 [Page 2]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


     6.3.  LSA TLV Processing Backward Compatibility . . . . . . . .  28
   7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  29
   8.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  29
     8.1.  OSPFv3 Extended-LSA TLV Registry  . . . . . . . . . . . .  29
     8.2.  OSPFv3 Extended-LSA sub-TLV Registry  . . . . . . . . . .  30
   9.  Contributors  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  31
   10. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  31
     10.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  31
     10.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  31
   Appendix A.  Appendix A - Global Configuration Parameters . . . .  32
   Appendix B.  Appendix B - Area Configuration Parameters . . . . .  32
   Appendix C.  Acknowledgments  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  33
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  33

1.  Introduction

   OSPFv3 requires functional extension beyond what can readily be done
   with the fixed-format Link State Advertisement (LSA) as described in
   RFC 5340 [OSPFV3].  Without LSA extension, attributes associated with
   OSPFv3 links and advertised IPv6 prefixes must be advertised in
   separate LSAs and correlated to the fixed-format LSAs.  This document
   extends the LSA format by encoding the existing OSPFv3 LSA
   information in Type-Length-Value (TLV) tuples and allowing
   advertisement of additional information with additional TLVs.
   Backward compatibility mechanisms are also described.

   This document updates RFC 5340, "OSPF for IPv6", and RFC 5838,
   "Support of Address Families in OSPFv3" by providing TLV-based
   encodings for the base OSPFv3 support [OSPFV3] and OSPFv3 address
   family support [OSPFV3-AF].

   A similar extension was previously proposed in support of multi-
   topology routing.  Additional requirements for OSPFv3 LSA extension
   include source/destination routing, route tagging, and others.

   A final requirement is to limit the changes to OSPFv3 to those
   necessary for TLV-based LSAs.  For the most part, the semantics of
   existing OSPFv3 LSAs are retained for their TLV-based successor LSAs
   described herein.  Additionally, encoding details, e.g., the
   representation of IPv6 prefixes as described in section A.4.1 in RFC
   5340 [OSPFV3], have been retained.  This requirement was included to
   increase the expedience of IETF adoption and deployment.

   The following aspects of OSPFv3 LSA extension are described:

   1.  Extended LSA Types

   2.  Extended LSA TLVs



Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                 [Page 3]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


   3.  Extended LSA Formats

   4.  Backward Compatibility

1.1.  Requirements notation

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

1.2.  OSPFv3 LSA Terminology

   The TLV-based OSPFv3 LSAs described in this document will be referred
   to as Extended LSAs.  The OSPFv3 fixed-format LSAs [OSPFV3] will be
   referred to as Legacy LSAs.

2.  OSPFv3 Extended LSA Types

   In order to provide backward compatibility, new LSA codes must be
   allocated.  There are eight fixed-format LSAs defined in RFC 5340
   [OSPFV3].  For ease of implementation and debugging, the LSA function
   codes are the same as the fixed-format LSAs only with 32, i.e., 0x20,
   added.  The alternative to this mapping was to allocate a bit in the
   LS Type indicating the new LSA format.  However, this would have used
   one half the LSA function code space for the migration of the eight
   original fixed-format LSAs.  For backward compatibility, the U-bit
   MUST be set in LS Type so that the LSAs will be flooded by OSPFv3
   routers that do not understand them.


            LSA function code   LS Type   Description
            ----------------------------------------------------
            33                  0xA021    E-Router-LSA
            34                  0xA022    E-Network-LSA
            35                  0xA023    E-Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA
            36                  0xA024    E-Inter-Area-Router-LSA
            37                  0xC025    E-AS-External-LSA
            38                  N/A       Unused (Not to be allocated)
            39                  0xA027    E-Type-7-LSA
            40                  0x8028    E-Link-LSA
            41                  0xA029    E-Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA


                         OSPFv3 Extended LSA Types





Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                 [Page 4]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


3.  OSPFv3 Extended LSA TLVs

   The format of the TLVs within the body of the extended LSAs is the
   same as the format used by the Traffic Engineering Extensions to OSPF
   [TE].  The variable TLV section consists of one or more nested
   Type/Length/Value (TLV) tuples.  Nested TLVs are also referred to as
   sub-TLVs.  The format of each TLV is:

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |              Type             |             Length            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                            Value...                           |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


                                TLV Format

   The Length field defines the length of the value portion in octets
   (thus, a TLV with no value portion would have a length of 0).  The
   TLV is padded to 4-octet alignment; padding is not included in the
   length field (so a 3-octet value would have a length of 3, but the
   total size of the TLV would be 8 octets).  Nested TLVs are also
   32-bit aligned.  For example, a 1-byte value would have the length
   field set to 1, and 3 octets of padding would be added to the end of
   the value portion of the TLV.

   This document defines the following top-level TLV types:

   o  0 - Reserved

   o  1 - Router-Link TLV

   o  2 - Attached-Routers TLV

   o  3 - Inter-Area Prefix TLV

   o  4 - Inter-Area Router TLV

   o  5 - External Prefix TLV

   o  6 - Intra-Area Prefix TLV

   o  7 - IPv6 Link-Local Address TLV

   o  8 - IPv4 Link-Local Address TLV




Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                 [Page 5]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


   Additionally, this document defines the following sub-TLV types:

   o  0 - Reserved

   o  1 - IPv6 Forwarding Address sub-TLV

   o  2 - IPv4 Forwarding Address sub-TLV

   o  3 - Route Tag sub-TLV

   In general, TLVs and sub-TLVs MAY occur in any order and the
   specification should define whether the TLV or sub-TLV is required
   and the behavior when there are multiple occurrences of the TLV or
   sub-TLV.  While this document only describes the usage of TLVs and
   Sub-TLVs, Sub-TLVs may be nested to any level as long as the Sub-TLVs
   are fully specified in the specification for the subsuming Sub-TLV.

   For backward compatibility, an LSA is not considered malformed from a
   TLV perspective unless either a required TLV is missing or a
   specified TLV is less than the minimum required length.  Refer to
   Section 6.3 for more information on TLV backward compatibility.

3.1.  Prefix Options Extensions

   The prefix options are extended from Appendix A.4.1.1 [OSPFV3].  The
   applicability of the LA-bit is expanded and it SHOULD be set in
   Inter-Area-Prefix-TLVs and MAY be set in External-Prefix-TLVs when
   the advertised host IPv6 address, i.e., PrefixLength = 128, is an
   interface address.  In RFC 5340, the LA-bit is only set in Intra-
   Area-Prefix-LSAs (Section 4.4.3.9 in [OSPFV3]).  This will allow a
   stable address to be advertised without having to configure a
   separate loopback address in every OSPFv3 area.

3.1.1.  N-bit Prefix Option

   Additionally, the N-bit prefix option is defined.  The figure below
   shows the position of the N-bit in the prefix options (pending IANA
   allocation).  This corresponds to the value 0x20.

                      0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7
                    +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
                    |  |  | N|DN| P| x|LA|NU|
                    +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+



                         The Prefix Options field




Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                 [Page 6]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


   The N-bit is set in PrefixOptions for a host address
   (PrefixLength=128) that identifies the advertising router.  While it
   is similar to the LA-bit, there are two differences.  The advertising
   router MAY choose NOT to set the N-bit even when the above conditions
   are met.  If the N-bit is set and the PrefixLength is NOT 128, the
   N-bit MUST be ignored.  Additionally, the N-bit is propagated in the
   PrefixOptions when an OSPFv3 Area Border Router (ABR) originates an
   Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA for an Intra-Area route which has the N-bit set
   in the PrefixOptions.  Similarly, the N-bit is propagated in the
   PrefixOptions when an OSPFv3 NSSA ABR originates an E-AS-External-LSA
   corresponding to an NSSA route as described in section 3 of RFC 3101
   ([NSSA]).  The N-bit is added to the Inter-Area-Prefix-TLV
   (Section 3.4), External-Prefix-TLV (Section 3.6), and Intra-Area-
   Prefix-TLV (Section 3.7).  The N-bit is used as hint to identify the
   preferred address to reach the advertising OSPFv3 router.  This would
   be in contrast to an Anycast Address [IPV6-ADDRESS-ARCH] which could
   also be a local address with the LA-bit set.  It is useful for
   applications such as identifying the prefixes corresponding to Node
   Segment Identifiers (SIDs) in Segment Routing [SEGMENT-ROUTING].
   There may be future applications requiring selection of a prefix
   associated with an OSPFv3 router.

3.2.  Router-Link TLV

   The Router-Link TLV defines a single router link and the field
   definitions correspond directly to links in the OSPFv3 Router-LSA,
   section A.4.3, [OSPFV3].  The Router-Link TLV is only applicable to
   the E-Router-LSA (Section 4.1).  Inclusion in other Extended LSAs
   MUST be ignored.






















Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                 [Page 7]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |          1 (Router-Link)      |       TLV Length              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |     Type      |       0       |           Metric              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                      Interface ID                             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   Neighbor Interface ID                       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                    Neighbor Router ID                         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .                            sub-TLVs                           .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                              Router-Link TLV

3.3.  Attached-Routers TLV

   The Attached-Routers TLV defines all the routers attached to an
   OSPFv3 multi-access network.  The field definitions correspond
   directly to content of the OSPFv3 Network-LSA, section A.4.4,
   [OSPFV3].  The Attached-Routers TLV is only applicable to the E-
   Network-LSA (Section 4.2).  Inclusion in other Extended LSAs MUST be
   ignored.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |        2 (Attached-Routers)   |       TLV Length              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |              Adjacent Neighbor Router ID                      |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .              Additional Adjacent Neighbors                    .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                           Attached-Routers TLV

   There are two reasons for not having a separate TLV or sub-TLV for
   each adjacent neighbor.  The first is to discourage using the E-
   Network-LSA for more than its current role of solely advertising the
   routers attached to a multi-access network.  The router's metric as
   well as the attributes of individual attached routers should be



Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                 [Page 8]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


   advertised in their respective E-Router-LSAs.  The second reason is
   that there is only a single E-Network-LSA per multi-access link with
   the Link State ID set to the Designated Router's Interface ID and,
   consequently, compact encoding has been chosen to decrease the
   likelihood that the size of the E-Network-LSA will require IPv6
   fragmentation when advertised in an OSPFv3 Link State Update packet.













































Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                 [Page 9]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


3.4.  Inter-Area-Prefix TLV

   The Inter-Area-Prefix TLV defines a single OSPFV3 inter-area prefix.
   The field definitions correspond directly to the content of an OSPFv3
   IPv6 Prefix as defined in Section A.4.1, [OSPFV3] and an OSPFv3
   Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA, as defined in section A.4.5, [OSPFV3].
   Additionally, the PrefixOptions are extended as described in
   Section 3.1.  The Inter-Area-Prefix TLV is only applicable to the E-
   Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA (Section 4.3).  Inclusion in other Extended
   LSAs MUST be ignored.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       3 (Inter-Area Prefix)   |       TLV Length              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |      0        |                  Metric                       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | PrefixLength  | PrefixOptions |              0                |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                        Address Prefix                         |
      |                             ...                               |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .                            sub-TLVs                           .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                           Inter-Area Prefix TLV






















Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 10]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


3.5.  Inter-Area-Router TLV

   The Inter-Area-Router TLV defines a single OSPFv3 Autonomous System
   Boundary Router (ASBR) reachable in another area.  The field
   definitions correspond directly to the content of an OSPFv3 Inter-
   Area-Router-LSA, as defined in section A.4.6, [OSPFV3].  The Inter-
   Area-Router TLV is only applicable to the E-Inter-Area-Router-LSA
   (Section 4.4).  Inclusion in other Extended LSAs MUST be ignored.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       4 (Inter-Area Router)   |       TLV Length              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |      0        |                Options                        |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |      0        |                Metric                         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                 Destination Router ID                         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .                            sub-TLVs                           .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                           Inter-Area Router TLV

























Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 11]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


3.6.  External-Prefix TLV

   The External-Prefix TLV defines a single OSPFv3 external prefix.
   With the exception of omitted fields noted below, the field
   definitions correspond directly to the content of an OSPFv3 IPv6
   Prefix as defined in Section A.4.1, [OSPFV3] and an OSPFv3 AS-
   External-LSA, as defined in section A.4.7, [OSPFV3].  The External-
   Prefix TLV is only applicable to the E-AS-External-LSA (Section 4.5)
   and the E-NSSA-LSA (Section 4.6).  Additionally, the PrefixOptions
   are extended as described in Section 3.1.  Inclusion in other
   Extended LSAs MUST be ignored.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       5 (External Prefix)     |       TLV Length              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |         |E| | |                Metric                         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | PrefixLength  | PrefixOptions |              0                |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                        Address Prefix                         |
      |                             ...                               |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .                            sub-TLVs                           .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                            External Prefix TLV

   In the External-Prefix TLV, the optional IPv6/IPv4 Forwarding Address
   and External Route Tag are now sub-TLVs.  Given the Referenced LS
   type and Referenced Link State ID from the AS-External-LSA have never
   been used or even specified, they have been omitted from the External
   Prefix TLV.  If there were ever a requirement for a referenced LSA,
   it could be satisfied with a sub-TLV.

   The following sub-TLVs are defined for optional inclusion in the
   External Prefix TLV:

   o  1 - IPv6 Forwarding Address sub-TLV (Section 3.10)

   o  2 - IPv4 Forwarding Address sub-TLV (Section 3.11)

   o  3 - Route Tag sub-TLV (Section 3.12)





Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 12]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


3.7.  Intra-Area-Prefix TLV

   The Intra-Area-Prefix TLV defines a single OSPFv3 intra-area prefix.
   The field definitions correspond directly to the content of an OSPFv3
   IPv6 Prefix as defined in Section A.4.1, [OSPFV3] and an OSPFv3 Link-
   LSA, as defined in section A.4.9, [OSPFV3].  The Intra-Area-Prefix
   TLV is only applicable to the E-Link-LSA (Section 4.7) and the E-
   Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA (Section 4.8).  Additionally, the PrefixOptions
   are extended as described in Section 3.1.  Inclusion in other
   Extended LSAs MUST be ignored.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       6 (Intra-Area Prefix)   |       TLV Length              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |      0        |                  Metric                       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | PrefixLength  | PrefixOptions |              0                |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                        Address Prefix                         |
      |                             ...                               |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .                            sub-TLVs                           .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                           Intra-Area Prefix TLV






















Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 13]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


3.8.  IPv6 Link-Local Address TLV

   The IPv6 Link-Local Address TLV is to be used with IPv6 address
   families as defined in [OSPFV3-AF].  The IPv6 Link-Local Address TLV
   is only applicable to the E-Link-LSA (Section 4.7).  Inclusion in
   other Extended LSAs MUST be ignored.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  7 (IPv6 Local-Local Address) |       TLV Length              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                                                               |
      +-                                                             -+
      |                                                               |
      +-            IPv6 Link-Local Interface Address                -+
      |                                                               |
      +-                                                             -+
      |                                                               |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .                            sub-TLVs                           .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                        IPv6 Link-Local Address TLV

























Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 14]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


3.9.  IPv4 Link-Local Address TLV

   The IPv4 Link-Local Address TLV is to be used with IPv4 address
   families as defined in [OSPFV3-AF].  The IPv4 Link-Local Address TLV
   is only applicable to the E-Link-LSA (Section 4.7).  Inclusion in
   other Extended LSAs MUST be ignored.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  8 (IPv4 Local-Local Address) |       TLV Length              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |             IPv4 Link-Local Interface Address                 |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .                            sub-TLVs                           .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                        IPv4 Link-Local Address TLV































Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 15]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


3.10.  IPv6-Forwarding-Address Sub-TLV

   The IPv6 Forwarding Address TLV has identical semantics to the
   optional forwarding address in section A.4.7 of [OSPFV3].  The IPv6
   Forwarding Address TLV is applicable to the External-Prefix TLV
   (Section 3.6).  Specification as a sub-TLV of other TLVs is not
   defined herein.  The sub-TLV is optional and the first specified
   instance is used as the Forwarding Address as defined in [OSPFV3].
   Instances subsequent to the first MUST be ignored.

   The IPv6 Forwarding Address TLV is to be used with IPv6 address
   families as defined in [OSPFV3-AF] It MUST be ignored for other
   address families.  The IPv6 Forwarding Address TLV length must meet
   minimum length (16 octets) or it will be considered malformed as
   described in Section 6.3.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       1 - Forwarding Address  |          sub-TLV Length       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                                                               |
      +-                                                             -+
      |                                                               |
      +-                Forwarding Address                           -+
      |                                                               |
      +-                                                             -+
      |                                                               |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                        IPv6 Forwarding Address TLV

3.11.  IPv4-Forwarding-Address Sub-TLV

   The IPv4 Forwarding Address TLV has identical semantics to the
   optional forwarding address in section A.4.7 of [OSPFV3].  The IPv4
   Forwarding Address TLV is The IPv4 Forwarding Address TLV is
   applicable to the External-Prefix TLV (Section 3.6).  Specification
   as a sub-TLV of other TLVs is not defined herein.  The sub-TLV is
   optional and the first specified instance is used as the Forwarding
   Address as defined in [OSPFV3].  Instances subsequent to the first
   MUST be ignored.

   The IPv4 Forwarding Address TLV is to be used with IPv4 address
   families as defined in [OSPFV3-AF] It MUST be ignored for other
   address families.  The IPv4 Forwarding Address TLV length must meet
   minimum length (4 octets) or it will be considered malformed as
   described in Section 6.3.



Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 16]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       2 - Forwarding Address  |          sub-TLV Length       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                Forwarding Address                             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                        IPv4 Forwarding Address TLV

3.12.  Route-Tag Sub-TLV

   The optional Route Tag sub-TLV has identical semantics to the
   optional External Route Tag in section A.4.7 of [OSPFV3].  The Route
   Tag sub-TLV is applicable to the External-Prefix TLV (Section 3.6).
   Specification as a sub-TLV of other TLVs is not defined herein.  The
   sub-TLV is optional and the first specified instance is used as the
   Route Tag as defined in [OSPFV3].  Instances subsequent to the first
   MUST be ignored.

   The Route Tag TLV length must meet minimum length (4 octets) or it
   will be considered malformed as described in Section 6.3.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       3 - Route Tag           |          sub-TLV Length       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                        Route Tag                              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                             Route Tag Sub-TLV

4.  OSPFv3 Extended LSAs

   This section specifies the OSPFv3 Extended LSA formats and encoding.
   The Extended OSPFv3 LSAs corresponded directly to the original OSPFv3
   LSAs specified in [OSPFV3].

4.1.  OSPFv3 E-Router-LSA

   The E-Router-LSA has an LS Type of 0xA021 and has the same base
   information content as the Router-LSA defined in section A.4.3 of
   [OSPFV3].  However, unlike the existing Router-LSA, it is fully
   extendable and represented as TLVs.






Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 17]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


       0                    1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3  4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |           LS Age               |1|0|1|         0x21            |
      +-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                       Link State ID                            |
      +-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                    Advertising Router                          |
      +-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                    LS Sequence Number                          |
      +-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |        LS Checksum             |            Length             |
      +-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  0  |Nt|x|V|E|B|            Options                            |
      +-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                                .
      .                            TLVs                                .
      .                                                                .
      +-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


                            Extended Router-LSA

   Other than having a different LS Type, all LSA Header fields are the
   same as defined for the Router-LSA.  Initially, only the top-level
   Router-Link TLV Section 3.2 is applicable and an E-Router-LSA may
   include multiple Router-Link TLVs.  Like the existing Router-LSA, the
   LSA length is used to determine the end of the LSA including TLVs.
   Depending on the implementation, it is perfectly valid for an E-
   Router-LSA to not contain any Router-Link TLVs.  However, this would
   imply that the OSPFv3 router doesn't have any adjacencies in the
   corresponding area and is forming an adjacency or adjacencies over
   unnumbered link(s).  Note that no E-Router-LSA stub link is
   advertised for an unnumbered link.

















Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 18]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


4.2.  OSPFv3 E-Network-LSA

   The E-Network-LSA has an LS Type of 0xA022 and has the same base
   information content as the Network-LSA defined in section A.4.4 of
   [OSPFV3].  However, unlike the existing Network-LSA, it is fully
   extendable and represented as TLVs.


       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |          LS Age               |1|0|1|         0x22            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                      Link State ID                            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   Advertising Router                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   LS Sequence Number                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       LS Checksum             |            Length             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       0       |            Options                            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .                           TLVs                                .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


                               E-Network-LSA

   Other than having a different LS Type, all LSA Header fields are the
   same as defined for the Network-LSA.  Like the existing Network-LSA,
   the LSA length is used to determine the end of the LSA including
   TLVs.  Initially, only the top-level Attached-Routers TLV Section 3.3
   is applicable.  If the Attached-Router TLV is not included in the E-
   Network-LSA, it is treated as malformed as described in Section 5.
   Instances of the Attached-Router TLV subsequent to the first MUST be
   ignored.












Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 19]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


4.3.  OSPFv3 E-Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA

   The E-Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA has an LS Type of 0xA023 and has the same
   base information content as the Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA defined in
   section A.4.5 of [OSPFV3].  However, unlike the existing Inter-Area-
   Prefix-LSA, it is fully extendable and represented as TLVs.


       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |          LS Age               |1|0|1|         0x23            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                      Link State ID                            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   Advertising Router                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   LS Sequence Number                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       LS Checksum             |            Length             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .                           TLVs                                .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


                          E-Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA

   Other than having a different LS Type, all LSA Header fields are the
   same as defined for the Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA.  In order to retain
   compatibility and semantics with the current OSPFv3 specification,
   each Inter-Area-Prefix LSA MUST contain a single Inter-Area Prefix
   TLV.  This will facilitate migration and avoid changes to functions
   such as incremental SPF computation.

   Like the existing Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA, the LSA length is used to
   determine the end of the LSA including TLV.  Initially, only the top-
   level Inter-Area-Prefix TLV (Section 3.4) is applicable.  If the
   Inter-Area-Prefix TLV is not included in the E-Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA,
   it is treated as malformed as described in Section 5.  Instances of
   the Inter-Area-Prefix TLV subsequent to the first MUST be ignored.









Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 20]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


4.4.  OSPFv3 E-Inter-Area-Router-LSA

   The E-Inter-Area-Router-LSA has an LS Type of 0xA024 and has the same
   base information content as the Inter-Area-Router-LSA defined in
   section A.4.6 of [OSPFV3].  However, unlike the Inter-Area-Router-
   LSA, it is fully extendable and represented as TLVs.


       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |          LS Age               |1|0|1|         0x24            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                      Link State ID                            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   Advertising Router                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   LS Sequence Number                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       LS Checksum             |            Length             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .                           TLVs                                .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


                          E-Inter-Area-Router-LSA

   Other than having a different LS Type, all LSA Header fields are the
   same as defined for the Inter-Area-Router-LSA.  In order to retain
   compatibility and semantics with the current OSPFv3 specification,
   each Inter-Area-Router LSA MUST contain a single Inter-Area Router
   TLV.  This will facilitate migration and avoid changes to functions
   such as incremental SPF computation.

   Like the existing Inter-Area-Router-LSA, the LSA length is used to
   determine the end of the LSA including TLV.  Initially, only the top-
   level Inter-Area-Router TLV (Section 3.5) is applicable.  If the
   Inter-Area-Router TLV is not included in the E-Inter-Area-Router-LSA,
   it is treated as malformed as described in Section 5.  Instances of
   the Inter-Area-Router TLV subsequent to the first MUST be ignored.









Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 21]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


4.5.  OSPFv3 E-AS-External-LSA

   The E-AS-External-LSA has an LS Type of 0xC025 and has the same base
   information content as the AS-External-LSA defined in section A.4.7
   of [OSPFV3].  However, unlike the existing AS-External-LSA, it is
   fully extendable and represented as TLVs.


       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |          LS Age               |1|1|0|         0x25            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                      Link State ID                            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   Advertising Router                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   LS Sequence Number                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       LS Checksum             |            Length             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .                           TLVs                                .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


                             E-AS-External-LSA

   Other than having a different LS Type, all LSA Header fields are the
   same as defined for the AS-External-LSA.  In order to retain
   compatibility and semantics with the current OSPFv3 specification,
   each LSA MUST contain a single External Prefix TLV.  This will
   facilitate migration and avoid changes to OSPFv3 processes such as
   incremental SPF computation.

   Like the existing AS-External-LSA, the LSA length is used to
   determine the end of the LSA including sub-TLVs.  Initially, only the
   top-level External-Prefix TLV (Section 3.6) is applicable.  If the
   External-Prefix TLV is not included in the E-External-AS-LSA, it is
   treated as malformed as described in Section 5.  Instances of the
   External-Prefix TLV subsequent to the first MUST be ignored.









Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 22]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


4.6.  OSPFv3 E-NSSA-LSA

   The E-NSSA-LSA will have the same format and TLVs as the Extended AS-
   External-LSA Section 4.5.  This is the same relationship as exists
   between the NSSA-LSA defined in section A.4.8 of [OSPFV3], and the
   AS-External-LSA.  The NSSA-LSA will have type 0xA027 which implies
   area flooding scope.  Future requirements may dictate that supported
   TLVs differ between the E-AS-External-LSA and the E-NSSA-LSA.
   However, future requirements are beyond the scope of this document.










































Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 23]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


4.7.  OSPFv3 E-Link-LSA

   The E-Link-LSA has an LS Type of 0x8028 and will have the same base
   information content as the Link-LSA defined in section A.4.9 of
   [OSPFV3].  However, unlike the existing Link-LSA, it is extendable
   and represented as TLVs.


       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |          LS Age               |1|0|0|         0x28            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                      Link State ID                            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   Advertising Router                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   LS Sequence Number                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       LS Checksum             |            Length             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | Rtr Priority  |                Options                        |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .                           TLVs                                .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                                E-Link-LSA

   Other than having a different LS Type, all LSA Header fields are the
   same as defined for the Link-LSA.

   Only the Intra-Area-Prefix TLV (Section 3.7), IPv6 Link-Local Address
   TLV (Section 3.8), and IPv4 Link-Local Address TLV (Section 3.9) are
   applicable to the E-Link-LSA.  Like the Link-LSA, the E-Link-LSA
   affords advertisement of multiple intra-area prefixes.  Hence,
   multiple Intra-Area Prefix TLVs (Section 3.7) may be specified and
   the LSA length defines the end of the LSA including all TLVs.

   A single instance of the IPv6 Link-Local Address TLV (Section 3.8)
   SHOULD be included in the E-Link-LSA.  Instances following the first
   MUST be ignored.  For IPv4 address families as defined in
   [OSPFV3-AF], this TLV MUST be ignored.

   Similarly, only a single instance of the IPv4 Link-Local Address TLV
   (Section 3.9) SHOULD be included in the E-Link-LSA.  Instances




Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 24]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


   following the first MUST be ignored.  For OSPFv3 IPv6 address
   families as defined in [OSPFV3-AF], this TLV SHOULD be ignored.

   If the IPv4/IPv6 Link-Local Address TLV corresponding to the OSPFv3
   Address Family is not included in the E-Link-LSA, it is treated as
   malformed as described in Section 5.

   Future specifications may support advertisement of routing and
   topology information for multiple address families.  However, this is
   beyond the scope of this document.









































Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 25]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


4.8.  OSPFv3 E-Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA

   The E-Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA has an LS Type of 0xA029 and has the same
   base information content as the Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA defined in
   section A.4.10 of [OSPFV3] except for the Referenced LS Type.
   However, unlike the Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA, it is fully extendable and
   represented as TLVs.  The Referenced LS Type MUST be either an E-
   Router-LSA (0xA021) or an E-Network-LSA (0xA022).


       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |           LS Age              |1|0|1|         0x29            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                      Link State ID                            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   Advertising Router                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   LS Sequence Number                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |        LS Checksum            |            Length             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       0                       |     Referenced LS Type        |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                  Referenced Link State ID                     |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |               Referenced Advertising Router                   |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .                           TLVs                                .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


                          E-Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA

   Other than having a different LS Type, all LSA Header fields are the
   same as defined for the Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA.

   Like the Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA, the E-Intra-Area-Link-LSA affords
   advertisement of multiple intra-area prefixes.  Hence, multiple
   Intra-Area Prefix TLVs may be specified and the LSA length defines
   the end of the LSA including all TLVs.







Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 26]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


5.  Malformed OSPFv3 Extended LSA Handling

   Extended LSAs that have inconsistent length or other encoding errors,
   as described herein, MUST NOT be installed in the Link State
   Database, acknowledged, or flooded.  Reception of malformed LSAs
   SHOULD be counted and/or logged for examination by the administrator
   of the OSPFv3 Routing Domain.  Note that for the purposes of length
   validation, a TLV or Sub-TLV should not be considered invalid unless
   the length exceeds the length of the LSA or does not meet the minimum
   length requirements.  This allows for Sub-TLVs to be added as
   described in Section 6.3.

   Additionally, an LSA MUST be considered malformed if it does not
   include all of the required TLVs and Sub-TLVs.

6.  LSA Extension Backward Compatibility

   In the context of this document, backward compatibility is solely
   related to the capability of an OSPFv3 router to receive, process,
   and originate the TLV-based LSAs defined herein.  Unrecognized TLVs
   and sub-TLVs are ignored.  Backward compatibility for future OSPFv3
   extensions utilizing the TLV-based LSAs is out of scope and must be
   covered in the documents describing those extensions.  Both full and,
   if applicable, partial deployment SHOULD be specified for future TLV-
   based OSPFv3 LSA extensions.

6.1.  Full Extended LSA Migration

   If ExtendedLSASupport is enabled Appendix A, OSPFv3 Extended LSAs
   will be originated and used for the SPF computation.  Individual OSPF
   Areas can be migrated separately with the Legacy AS-External LSAs
   being originated and used for the SPF computation.  This is
   accomplished by enabled AreaExtendedLSASupport Appendix B.

   An OSPFv3 routing domain or area may be non-disruptively migrated
   using separate OSPFv3 instances for the extended LSAs.  Initially,
   the OSPFv3 instances with ExtendedLSASupport will have a lower
   preference, i.e., higher administrative distance, than the OSPFv3
   instances originating and using the Legacy LSAs.  Once the routing
   domain or area is fully migrated and the OSPFv3 Routing Information
   Bases (RIB) have been verified, the OSPFv3 instances using the
   extended LSAs can be given preference.  When this has been completed
   and the routing within the OSPF routing domain or area has been
   verified, the original OSPFv3 instance using Legacy LSAs can be
   removed.






Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 27]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


6.2.  Extended LSA Sparse-Mode Backward Compatibility

   In this mode, OSPFv3 will use the Legacy LSAs for the SPF computation
   and will only originate extended LSAs when LSA origination is
   required in support of additional functionality.  Furthermore, those
   extended LSAs will only include the top-level TLVs (e.g., Router-Link
   TLVs or Inter-Area TLVs) which require further specification for that
   new functionality.  However, if a top-level TLV is advertised, it
   MUST include required Sub-TLVs or it will be considered malformed as
   described in Section 5.  Hence, this mode of compatibility is known
   as "sparse-mode".  The advantage of sparse-mode is that functionality
   utilizing the OSPFv3 extended LSAs can be added to an existing OSFPv3
   routing domain without the requirement for migration.  In essence,
   this compatibility mode is very much like the approach taken for
   OSPFv2 [OSPF-PREFIX-LINK].  As with all the compatibility modes,
   backward compatibility for the functions utilizing the extended LSAs
   must be described in the IETF documents describing those functions.

6.3.  LSA TLV Processing Backward Compatibility

   This section defines the general rules for processing LSA TLVs.  To
   ensure compatibility of future TLV-based LSA extensions, all
   implementations MUST adhere to these rules:

   1.  Unrecognized TLVs and sub-TLVs are ignored when parsing or
       processing Extended-LSAs.

   2.  Whether or not partial deployment of a given TLV is supported
       MUST be specified.

   3.  If partial deployment is not supported, mechanisms to ensure the
       corresponding feature are not deployed MUST be specified in the
       document defining the new TLV or sub-TLV.

   4.  If partial deployment is supported, backward compatibility and
       partial deployment MUST be specified in the document defining the
       new TLV or sub-TLV.

   5.  If a TLV or Sub-TLV is recognized but the length is less than the
       minimum, then the LSA should be considered malformed and it
       SHOULD NOT be acknowledged.  Additionally, the occurrence SHOULD
       be logged with enough information to identify the LSA by type,
       originator, and sequence number and the TLV or Sub-TLV in error.
       Ideally, the log entry would include the hexadecimal or binary
       representation of the LSA including the malformed TLS or Sub-TLV.

   6.  Documents specifying future TLVs or Sub-TLVs MUST specify the
       requirements for usage of those TLVs or Sub-TLVs.



Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 28]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


   7.  Future TLV or Sub-TLVs must be optional.  However, there may be
       requirements for Sub-TLVs if an optional TLV is specified.

7.  Security Considerations

   In general, extendible OSPFv3 LSAs are subject to the same security
   concerns as those described in RFC 5340 [OSPFV3].  Additionally,
   implementations must assure that malformed TLV and sub-TLV
   permutations do not result in errors that cause hard OSPFv3 failures.

   If there were ever a requirement to digitally sign OSPFv3 LSAs as
   described for OSPFv2 LSAs in RFC 2154 [OSPF-DIGITAL-SIGNATURE], the
   mechanisms described herein would greatly simplify the extension.

8.  IANA Considerations

   This specification defines nine OSPFv3 Extended LSA types as
   described in Section 2.  These are added the existing OSPFv3 LSA
   Function Codes registry.

   The specification defines a new code point for the N-bit in the
   OSPFv3 Prefix-Options registry.  The value 0x20 is suggested.

   This specification also creates two registries OSPFv3 Extended-LSAs
   TLVs and sub-TLVs.  The TLV and sub-TLV code-points in these
   registries are common to all Extended-LSAs and their respective
   definitions must define where they are applicable.

8.1.  OSPFv3 Extended-LSA TLV Registry

   The OSPFv3 Extended-LSA TLV registry defines top-level TLVs for
   Extended-LSAs and should be placed in the existing OSPFv3 IANA
   registry.

   Nine values are allocated by this specification:

   o  0 - Reserved

   o  1 - Router-Link TLV

   o  2 - Attached-Routers TLV

   o  3 - Inter-Area Prefix TLV

   o  4 - Inter-Area Router TLV

   o  5 - External Prefix TLV




Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 29]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


   o  6 - Intra-Area Prefix TLV

   o  7 - IPv6 Link-Local Address TLV

   o  8 - IPv4 Link-Local Address TLV

   Types in the range 9-32767 are allocated via IETF Consensus or IESG
   Approval.

   Types in the range 32768-33023 are for experimental use; these will
   not be registered with IANA, and MUST NOT be mentioned by RFCs.

   Types in the range 33024-45055 are to be assigned on a First-Come-
   First-Serve (FCFS) basis.

   Types in the range 45056-65535 are not to be assigned at this time.
   Before any assignments can be made in the 33024-65535 range, there
   MUST be an IETF specification that specifies IANA Considerations that
   covers the range being assigned.

8.2.  OSPFv3 Extended-LSA sub-TLV Registry

   The OSPFv3 Extended-LSA sub-TLV registry defines sub-TLVs at any
   level of nesting for Extended-LSAs and should be placed in the
   existing OSPFv3 IANA registry.

   Four values are allocated by this specification:

   o  0 - Reserved

   o  1 - IPv6 Forwarding Address sub-TLV

   o  2 - IPv4 Forwarding Address sub-TLV

   o  3 - Route Tag sub-TLV

   Types in the range 4-32767 are allocated via IETF Consensus or IESG
   Approval.

   Types in the range 32768-33023 are for experimental use; these will
   not be registered with IANA, and MUST NOT be mentioned by RFCs.

   Types in the range 33024-45055 are to be assigned on a First-Come-
   First-Serve (FCFS) basis.

   Types in the range 45056-65535 are not to be assigned at this time.
   Before any assignments can be made in the 33024-65535 range, there




Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 30]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


   MUST be an IETF specification that specifies IANA Considerations that
   covers the range being assigned.

9.  Contributors

   Contributors' Addresses

      Sina Mirtorabi
      Cisco Systems
      170 Tasman Drive
      San Jose, CA  95134
      USA
      Email: sina@cisco.com


10.  References

10.1.  Normative References

   [NSSA]     Murphy, P., "The OSPF Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA) Option",
              RFC 3101, January 2003.

   [OSPFV3]   Coltun, R., Ferguson, D., Moy, J., and A. Lindem, "OSPF
              for IPv6", RFC 5340, July 2008.

   [OSPFV3-AF]
              Lindem, A., Mirtorabi, S., Roy, A., Barnes, M., and R.
              Aggarwal, "Support of Address Families in OSPFv3",
              RFC 5838, April 2010.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", RFC 8174, May 2017.

   [TE]       Katz, D., Yeung, D., and K. Kompella, "Traffic Engineering
              Extensions to OSPF", RFC 3630, September 2003.

10.2.  Informative References

   [IPV6-ADDRESS-ARCH]
              Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
              Architecture", RFC 4291, February 2006.







Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 31]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


   [MT-OSPFV3]
              Mirtorabi, S. and A. Roy, "Multi-topology routing in
              OSPFv3 (MT-OSPFV3)", draft-ietf-ospf-mt-ospfv3-04.txt
              (work in progress), January 2008.

   [OSPF-DIGITAL-SIGNATURE]
              Murphy, S., Badger, M., and B. Wellington, "OSPF with
              Digital Signatures", RFC 2154, June 1997.

   [OSPF-PREFIX-LINK]
              Psenak, P., Gredler, H., Shakir, R., Henderickx, W.,
              Tantsura, J., and A. Lindem, "OSPF Prefix/Link
              Attributes", RFC 7684, December 2015.

   [SEGMENT-ROUTING]
              Psenak, P., Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H.,
              Shakir, R., Henderickx, W., and J. Tantsura, "OSPFv3
              Extensions for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-
              segment-routing-extensions-10.txt (work in progress), July
              2016.

Appendix A.  Appendix A - Global Configuration Parameters

   The global configurable parameter ExtendedLSASupport is added to the
   OSPFv3 protocol.  If ExtendedLSASupport is enabled, the OSPFv3 Router
   will originate OSPFv3 Extended LSAs and use the LSAs for the SPF
   computation.  If ExtendedLSASupport is not enabled, a subset of
   OSPFv3 Extended LSAs may still be originated and used for other
   functions as described in Section 6.2.

Appendix B.  Appendix B - Area Configuration Parameters

   The area configurable parameter AreaExtendedLSASupport is added to
   the OSPFv3 protocol.  If AreaExtendedLSASupport is enabled, the
   OSPFv3 Router will originate link and area OSPFv3 Extended LSAs and
   use the LSAs for the SPF computation.  Legacy AS-Scoped LSAs will
   still be originated and used for the AS External LSA computation.  If
   AreaExtendedLSASupport is not enabled a subset of OSPFv3 link and
   area Extended LSAs may still be originated and used for other
   functions as described in Section 6.2.

   For regular areas, i.e., areas where AS scoped LSAs are flooded,
   disabling AreaExtendedLSASupport for a regular OSPFv3 area (not a
   Stub or NSSA area) when ExtendedLSASupport is enabled is
   contradictory and SHOULD be prohibited by the implementation.






Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 32]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


Appendix C.  Acknowledgments

   OSPFv3 TLV-based LSAs were first proposed in "Multi-topology routing
   in OSPFv3 (MT-OSPFv3)" [MT-OSPFV3].

   Thanks for Peter Psenak for significant contributions to the backward
   compatibility mechanisms.

   Thanks go to Michael Barnes, Mike Dubrovsky, Anton Smirnov, and Tony
   Przygienda for review of the draft versions and discussions of
   backward compatibility.

   Thanks to Alan Davey for review and comments including the suggestion
   to separate the extended LSA TLV definitions from the extended LSAs
   definitions.

   Thanks to David Lamparter for review and suggestions on backward
   compatibility.

   Thanks to Karsten Thomann, Chris Bowers, Meng Zhang, and Nagendra
   Kumar for review and editorial comments.

   Thanks to Alia Atlas for substantive Routing Area Director (AD)
   comments prior to IETF last call.

   Thanks to Alvaro Retana and Suresh Krishna for substantive comments
   during IESG Review.

   Thanks to Mehmet Ersue for OPS Directorate review.

   The RFC text was produced using Marshall Rose's xml2rfc tool.

Authors' Addresses

   Acee Lindem
   Cisco Systems
   301 Midenhall Way
   Cary, NC  27513
   USA

   Email: acee@cisco.com










Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 33]


Internet-Draft          OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility            January 2018


   Abhay Roy
   Cisco Systems
   170 Tasman Drive
   San Jose, CA  95134
   USA

   Email: akr@cisco.com


   Dirk Goethals
   Nokia
   Copernicuslaan 50
   Antwerp 2018
   Belgium

   Email: dirk.goethals@nokia.com


   Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem
   Bangalore
   India

   Email: vallem.veerendra@gmail.com


   Fred Baker
   Santa Barbara, California  93117
   USA

   Email: FredBaker.IETF@gmail.com





















Lindem, et al.            Expires July 29, 2018                [Page 34]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.126, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/