[Docs] [txt|pdf|xml] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: (draft-thomson-webpush-encryption) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 RFC 8291

Network Working Group                                         M. Thomson
Internet-Draft                                                   Mozilla
Intended status: Standards Track                        October 31, 2016
Expires: May 4, 2017


                    Message Encryption for Web Push
                    draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-06

Abstract

   A message encryption scheme is described for the Web Push protocol.
   This scheme provides confidentiality and integrity for messages sent
   from an Application Server to a User Agent.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on May 4, 2017.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.





Thomson                    Expires May 4, 2017                  [Page 1]


Internet-Draft             Web Push Encryption              October 2016


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Notational Conventions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Push Message Encryption Overview  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.1.  Key and Secret Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Push Message Encryption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.1.  Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.2.  Push Message Authentication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     3.3.  Combining Shared and Authentication Secrets . . . . . . .   5
     3.4.  Encryption Summary  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   4.  Restrictions on Use of "aes128gcm" Content Coding . . . . . .   6
   5.  Push Message Encryption Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   8.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     8.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     8.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   Appendix A.  Intermediate Values for Encryption . . . . . . . . .  10
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11

1.  Introduction

   The Web Push protocol [I-D.ietf-webpush-protocol] is an intermediated
   protocol by necessity.  Messages from an Application Server are
   delivered to a User Agent via a Push Service.

    +-------+           +--------------+       +-------------+
    |  UA   |           | Push Service |       | Application |
    +-------+           +--------------+       +-------------+
        |                      |                      |
        |        Setup         |                      |
        |<====================>|                      |
        |           Provide Subscription              |
        |-------------------------------------------->|
        |                      |                      |
        :                      :                      :
        |                      |     Push Message     |
        |    Push Message      |<---------------------|
        |<---------------------|                      |
        |                      |                      |

   This document describes how messages sent using this protocol can be
   secured against inspection, modification and falsification by a Push
   Service.

   Web Push messages are the payload of an HTTP message [RFC7230].
   These messages are encrypted using an encrypted content encoding



Thomson                    Expires May 4, 2017                  [Page 2]


Internet-Draft             Web Push Encryption              October 2016


   [I-D.ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding].  This document describes how
   this content encoding is applied and describes a recommended key
   management scheme.

   For efficiency reasons, multiple users of Web Push often share a
   central agent that aggregates push functionality.  This agent can
   enforce the use of this encryption scheme by applications that use
   push messaging.  An agent that only delivers messages that are
   properly encrypted strongly encourages the end-to-end protection of
   messages.

   A web browser that implements the Web Push API [API] can enforce the
   use of encryption by forwarding only those messages that were
   properly encrypted.

1.1.  Notational Conventions

   The words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "SHOULD", and "MAY" are used in this
   document.  It's not shouting, when they are capitalized, they have
   the special meaning described in [RFC2119].

2.  Push Message Encryption Overview

   Encrypting a push message uses elliptic-curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH)
   [ECDH] on the P-256 curve [FIPS186] to establish a shared secret (see
   Section 3.1) and a symmetric secret for authentication (see
   Section 3.2).

   A User Agent generates an ECDH key pair and authentication secret
   that it associates with each subscription it creates.  The ECDH
   public key and the authentication secret are sent to the Application
   Server with other details of the push subscription.

   When sending a message, an Application Server generates an ECDH key
   pair and a random salt.  The ECDH public key is encoded into the "dh"
   parameter of the Crypto-Key header field; the salt is encoded into
   message payload.  The ECDH key pair can be discarded after encrypting
   the message.

   The content of the push message is encrypted or decrypted using a
   content encryption key and nonce that is derived using all of these
   inputs and the process described in Section 3.

2.1.  Key and Secret Distribution

   The application using the subscription distributes the subscription
   public key and authentication secret to an authorized Application
   Server.  This could be sent along with other subscription information



Thomson                    Expires May 4, 2017                  [Page 3]


Internet-Draft             Web Push Encryption              October 2016


   that is provided by the User Agent, such as the push subscription
   URI.

   An application MUST use an authenticated, confidentiality protected
   communications medium for this purpose.  In addition to the reasons
   described in [I-D.ietf-webpush-protocol], this ensures that the
   authentication secret is not revealed to unauthorized entities, which
   can be used to generate push messages that will be accepted by the
   User Agent.

   Most applications that use push messaging have a pre-existing
   relationship with an Application Server.  Any existing communication
   mechanism that is authenticated and provides confidentiality and
   integrity, such as HTTPS [RFC2818], is sufficient.

3.  Push Message Encryption

   Push message encryption happens in four phases:

   o  A shared secret is derived using elliptic-curve Diffie-Hellman
      [ECDH] (Section 3.1).

   o  The shared secret is then combined with the application secret to
      produce the input keying material used in
      [I-D.ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding] (Section 3.3).

   o  A content encryption key and nonce are derived using the process
      in [I-D.ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding].

   o  Encryption or decryption follows according to
      [I-D.ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding].

   The key derivation process is summarized in Section 3.4.
   Restrictions on the use of the encrypted content coding are described
   in Section 4.

3.1.  Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement

   For each new subscription that the User Agent generates for an
   Application, it also generates a P-256 [FIPS186] key pair for use in
   elliptic-curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) [ECDH].

   When sending a push message, the Application Server also generates a
   new ECDH key pair on the same P-256 curve.

   The ECDH public key for the Application Server is included in the
   "dh" parameter of the Crypto-Key header field (see Section 6).  The
   uncompressed point form defined in [X9.62] (that is, a 65 octet



Thomson                    Expires May 4, 2017                  [Page 4]


Internet-Draft             Web Push Encryption              October 2016


   sequence that starts with a 0x04 octet) is encoded using base64url
   [RFC7515] to produce the "dh" parameter value.

   An Application combines its ECDH private key with the public key
   provided by the User Agent using the process described in [ECDH]; on
   receipt of the push message, a User Agent combines its private key
   with the public key provided by the Application Server in the "dh"
   parameter in the same way.  These operations produce the same value
   for the ECDH shared secret.

3.2.  Push Message Authentication

   To ensure that push messages are correctly authenticated, a symmetric
   authentication secret is added to the information generated by a User
   Agent.  The authentication secret is mixed into the key derivation
   process shown in Section 3.3.

   A User Agent MUST generate and provide a hard to guess sequence of 16
   octets that is used for authentication of push messages.  This SHOULD
   be generated by a cryptographically strong random number generator
   [RFC4086].

3.3.  Combining Shared and Authentication Secrets

   The shared secret produced by ECDH is combined with the
   authentication secret using HMAC-based key derivation function (HKDF)
   described in [RFC5869].  This produces the input keying material used
   by [I-D.ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding].

   The HKDF function uses SHA-256 hash algorithm [FIPS180-4] with the
   following inputs:

   salt:  the authentication secret

   IKM:  the shared secret derived using ECDH

   info:  the concatenation of the ASCII-encoded string "WebPush: info",
      a zero octet, the X9.62 encoding of the User Agent ECDH public
      key, and X9.62 encoding of the Application Server ECDH public key;
      that is

   key_info = "WebPush: info" || 0x00 || ua_public || as_public

   L: 32 octets (i.e., the output is the length of the underlying
      SHA-256 HMAC function output)






Thomson                    Expires May 4, 2017                  [Page 5]


Internet-Draft             Web Push Encryption              October 2016


3.4.  Encryption Summary

   This results in a the final content encryption key and nonce
   generation using the following sequence, which is shown here in
   pseudocode with HKDF expanded into separate discrete steps using HMAC
   with SHA-256:

      -- For a User Agent:
      ecdh_secret = ECDH(ua_private, as_public)
      auth_secret = random(16)

      -- For an Application Server:
      ecdh_secret = ECDH(as_private, ua_public)
      auth_secret = <from User Agent>

      -- For both:
      PRK_key = HMAC-SHA-256(auth_secret, ecdh_secret)
      key_info = "WebPush: info" || 0x00 || ua_public || as_public
      IKM = HMAC-SHA-256(PRK_cek, key_info || 0x01)

      salt = random(16)
      PRK = HMAC-SHA-256(salt, IKM)
      cek_info = "Content-Encoding: aes128gcm" || 0x00
      CEK = HMAC-SHA-256(PRK, cek_info || 0x01)[0..15]
      nonce_info = "Content-Encoding: nonce" || 0x00
      NONCE = HMAC-SHA-256(PRK, nonce_info || 0x01)[0..11]

   Note that this omits the exclusive OR of the final nonce with the
   record sequence number, since push messages contain only a single
   record (see Section 4) and the sequence number of the first record is
   zero.

4.  Restrictions on Use of "aes128gcm" Content Coding

   An Application Server MUST encrypt a push message with a single
   record.  This allows for a minimal receiver implementation that
   handles a single record.  An application server MUST set the "rs"
   parameter in the "aes128gcm" content coding header to a size that is
   greater than the length of the plaintext, plus any padding (which is
   at least 2 octets).

   A push message MUST include a zero length "keyid" parameter in the
   content coding header.

   A push service is not required to support more than 4096 octets of
   payload body (see Section 7.2 of [I-D.ietf-webpush-protocol]), which
   equates to at most 4057 octets of plaintext.




Thomson                    Expires May 4, 2017                  [Page 6]


Internet-Draft             Web Push Encryption              October 2016


   An Application Server MUST NOT use other content encodings for push
   messages.  In particular, content encodings that compress could
   result in leaking of push message contents.  The Content-Encoding
   header field therefore has exactly one value, which is "aes128gcm".
   Multiple "aes128gcm" values are not permitted.

   An Application Server MUST include exactly one "aes128gcm" content
   coding, and at most one entry having a "dh" parameter in the Crypto-
   Key field.  This allows the "keyid" parameter to be omitted.

   An Application Server MUST NOT include an "aes128gcm" parameter in
   the Crypto-Key header field.

   A User Agent is not required to support multiple records.  A User
   Agent MAY ignore the "rs" field and assume that the "keyid" field is
   empty.  If a record size is unchecked, decryption will fail with high
   probability for all valid cases.  However, decryption will also
   succeed if the push message contains a single record from a longer
   truncated message.  Given that an Application Server is prohibited
   from generating such a message, this is not considered a serious
   risk.

5.  Push Message Encryption Example

   The following example shows a push message being sent to a push
   service.

   POST /push/JzLQ3raZJfFBR0aqvOMsLrt54w4rJUsV HTTP/1.1
   Host: push.example.net
   TTL: 10
   Content-Length: 33
   Content-Encoding: aes128gcm
   Crypto-Key: dh=BP4z9KsN6nGRTbVYI_c7VJSPQTBtkgcy27mlmlMoZIIg
                  Dll6e3vCYLocInmYWAmS6TlzAC8wEqKK6PBru3jl7A8

   DGv6ra1nlYgDCS1FRnbzlwAAxowAIg1VvoJvrVBFhclGlx4G2FuProCVzJY04Lg5
   vUP2LeswtWoBGHGoYXUzAwuxQGRGxoNbh8BROK3gmJ0

   This example shows the ASCII encoded string, "When I grow up, I want
   to be a watermelon".  The content body is shown here with line
   wrapping and URL-safe base64url encoding to meet presentation
   constraints.  Similarly, the "dh" parameter wrapped to meet line
   length constraints.

   Since there is no ambiguity about which keys are being used, the
   "keyid" parameter is omitted from both the Encryption and Crypto-Key
   header fields.  The keys shown below use uncompressed points [X9.62]
   encoded using base64url.



Thomson                    Expires May 4, 2017                  [Page 7]


Internet-Draft             Web Push Encryption              October 2016


      Authentication Secret: BTBZMqHH6r4Tts7J_aSIgg
      Receiver:
         private key: q1dXpw3UpT5VOmu_cf_v6ih07Aems3njxI-JWgLcM94
         public key: BCVxsr7N_eNgVRqvHtD0zTZsEc6-VV-JvLexhqUzORcx
                     aOzi6-AYWXvTBHm4bjyPjs7Vd8pZGH6SRpkNtoIAiw4
      Sender:
         private key: yfWPiYE-n46HLnH0KqZOF1fJJU3MYrct3AELtAQ-oRw
         public key: <the value of the "dh" parameter>

   Intermediate values for this example are included in Appendix A.

6.  IANA Considerations

   This document defines the "dh" parameter for the Crypto-Key header
   field in the "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Crypto-Key
   Parameters" registry defined in
   [I-D.ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding].

   o  Parameter Name: dh

   o  Purpose: The "dh" parameter contains a Diffie-Hellman share which
      is used to derive the input keying material used in "aes128gcm"
      content coding.

   o  Reference: this document.

7.  Security Considerations

   The security considerations of [I-D.ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding]
   describe the limitations of the content encoding.  In particular, any
   HTTP header fields are not protected by the content encoding scheme.
   A User Agent MUST consider HTTP header fields to have come from the
   Push Service.  An application on the User Agent that uses information
   from header fields to alter their processing of a push message is
   exposed to a risk of attack by the Push Service.

   The timing and length of communication cannot be hidden from the Push
   Service.  While an outside observer might see individual messages
   intermixed with each other, the Push Service will see what
   Application Server is talking to which User Agent, and the
   subscription that is used.  Additionally, the length of messages
   could be revealed unless the padding provided by the content encoding
   scheme is used to obscure length.








Thomson                    Expires May 4, 2017                  [Page 8]


Internet-Draft             Web Push Encryption              October 2016


8.  References

8.1.  Normative References

   [ECDH]     SECG, "Elliptic Curve Cryptography", SEC 1 , 2000,
              <http://www.secg.org/>.

   [FIPS180-4]
              Department of Commerce, National., "NIST FIPS 180-4,
              Secure Hash Standard", March 2012,
              <http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/
              NIST.FIPS.180-4.pdf>.

   [FIPS186]  National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
              "Digital Signature Standard (DSS)", NIST PUB 186-4 , July
              2013.

   [I-D.ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding]
              Thomson, M., "Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP", draft-
              ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03 (work in progress),
              October 2016.

   [I-D.ietf-webpush-protocol]
              Thomson, M., Damaggio, E., and B. Raymor, "Generic Event
              Delivery Using HTTP Push", draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-12
              (work in progress), October 2016.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC4086]  Eastlake 3rd, D., Schiller, J., and S. Crocker,
              "Randomness Requirements for Security", BCP 106, RFC 4086,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4086, June 2005,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4086>.

   [RFC5869]  Krawczyk, H. and P. Eronen, "HMAC-based Extract-and-Expand
              Key Derivation Function (HKDF)", RFC 5869,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5869, May 2010,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5869>.

   [RFC7515]  Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, "JSON Web
              Signature (JWS)", RFC 7515, DOI 10.17487/RFC7515, May
              2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7515>.






Thomson                    Expires May 4, 2017                  [Page 9]


Internet-Draft             Web Push Encryption              October 2016


   [X9.62]    ANSI, "Public Key Cryptography For The Financial Services
              Industry: The Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm
              (ECDSA)", ANSI X9.62 , 1998.

8.2.  Informative References

   [API]      van Ouwerkerk, M. and M. Thomson, "Web Push API", 2015,
              <https://w3c.github.io/push-api/>.

   [RFC2818]  Rescorla, E., "HTTP Over TLS", RFC 2818,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2818, May 2000,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2818>.

   [RFC7230]  Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer
              Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing",
              RFC 7230, DOI 10.17487/RFC7230, June 2014,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7230>.

Appendix A.  Intermediate Values for Encryption

   The intermediate values calculated for the example in Section 5 are
   shown here.  The following are inputs to the calculation:

   Plaintext:  V2hlbiBJIGdyb3cgdXAsIEkgd2FudCB0byBiZSBhIHdhdGVybWVsb24

   Application Server public key (as_public):
      BP4z9KsN6nGRTbVYI_c7VJSPQTBtkgcy27mlmlMoZIIg
      Dll6e3vCYLocInmYWAmS6TlzAC8wEqKK6PBru3jl7A8

   Application Server private key (as_private):  yfWPiYE-n46HLnH0KqZOF1f
      JJU3MYrct3AELtAQ-oRw

   User Agent public key (ua_public):  BCVxsr7N_eNgVRqvHtD0zTZsEc6-VV-
      JvLexhqUzORcx aOzi6-AYWXvTBHm4bjyPjs7Vd8pZGH6SRpkNtoIAiw4

   User Agent private key (ua_private):
      q1dXpw3UpT5VOmu_cf_v6ih07Aems3njxI-JWgLcM94

   Salt:  DGv6ra1nlYgDCS1FRnbzlw

   Authentication secret (auth_secret):  BTBZMqHH6r4Tts7J_aSIgg

   Note that knowledge of just one of the private keys is necessary.
   The Application Server randomly generates the salt value, whereas
   salt is input to the receiver.

   This produces the following intermediate values:




Thomson                    Expires May 4, 2017                 [Page 10]


Internet-Draft             Web Push Encryption              October 2016


   Shared ECDH secret (ecdh_secret):  kyrL1jIIOHEzg3sM2ZWRHDRB62YACZhhSl
      knJ672kSs

   Pseudo-random key for key combining (PRK_key):
      Snr3JMxaHVDXHWJn5wdC52WjpCtd2EIEGBykDcZW32k

   Info for key combining (key_info):  V2ViUHVzaDogaW5mbwAE_jP0qw3qcZFNt
      Vgj9ztUlI9 BMG2SBzLbuaWaUyhkgiAOWXp7e8JguhwieZhYCZLpOX
      MALzASooro8Gu7eOXsDwQlcbK-zf3jYFUarx7Q9M02b
      BHOvlVfiby3sYalMzkXMWjs4uvgGFl70wR5uG48j47O 1XfKWRh-kkaZDbaCAIsO

   Input keying material for content encryption key derivation (IKM):
      dTQXtQpktdp6UQb29SUBcO5igFtC9WsXlhlNr2jRkkY

   PRK for content encryption (PRK):  BEhmz5JYdOXMsFJf_WDU8fJlOURaExoUoF
      uaGU86Fuc

   Info for content encryption key derivation (cek_info):
      Q29udGVudC1FbmNvZGluZzogYWVzZ2NtMTI4AA

   Content encryption key (CEK):  wgJKGPLNgnI3CKy09z19Qw

   Info for content encryption nonce derivation (nonce_info):
      Q29udGVudC1FbmNvZGluZzogbm9uY2UA

   Nonce (NONCE):  w5SniqvyjVui9OoV

   The salt and a record size of 4096 produce a 21 octet header of
   DGv6ra1nlYgDCS1FRnbzlwAAxowA.

   The push message plaintext is padded to produce
   AABXaGVuIEkgZ3JvdyB1cCwgSSB3YW50IHRvIGJl IGEgd2F0ZXJtZWxvbg.  The
   plaintext is then encrypted with AES-GCM, which emits ciphertext of
   Ig1VvoJvrVBFhclGlx4G2FuProCVzJY04Lg5vUP2
   LeswtWoBGHGoYXUzAwuxQGRGxoNbh8BROK3gmJ0.

   The header and cipher text are concatenated and produce the result
   shown in the example.

Author's Address

   Martin Thomson
   Mozilla

   Email: martin.thomson@gmail.com






Thomson                    Expires May 4, 2017                 [Page 11]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129c, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/