[Docs] [txt|pdf|xml|html] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 RFC 7002

Audio/Video Transport Working Group                              G. Hunt
Internet-Draft                                              Unaffiliated
Intended status: Standards Track                                A. Clark
Expires: January 11, 2013                                       Telchemy
                                                                 G. Zorn
                                                             Network Zen
                                                                   Q. Wu
                                                                  Huawei
                                                           July 10, 2012


        RTCP XR Report Block for Discard Count metric Reporting
               draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-05.txt

Abstract

   This document defines an RTCP XR Report Block that allows the
   reporting of a simple discard count metric for use in a range of RTP
   applications.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on January 11, 2013.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must



Hunt, et al.            Expires January 11, 2013                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft               RTCP XR Discard                   July 2012


   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     1.1.  Discard Count Report Block . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     1.2.  RTCP and RTCP XR Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     1.3.  Performance Metrics Framework  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     1.4.  Applicability  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2.  Terminology  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
     2.1.  Standards Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   3.  Discard Count Metric Report Block  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     3.1.  Report Block Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     3.2.  Definition of Fields in Discard Count Metric Report
           Block  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
   4.  SDP Signaling  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
   5.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     5.1.  New RTCP XR Block Type value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     5.2.  New RTCP XR SDP Parameter  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     5.3.  Contact information for registrations  . . . . . . . . . .  9
   6.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
   7.  Acknowledgments  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
   8.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
     8.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
     8.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
   Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13






















Hunt, et al.            Expires January 11, 2013                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft               RTCP XR Discard                   July 2012


1.  Introduction

1.1.  Discard Count Report Block

   This document defines a new block type to augment those defined in
   [RFC3611] for use in a range of RTP applications.  The new block type
   supports the reporting of the number of packets which are received
   correctly but are never played out, typically because they arrive too
   late to be played out (buffer underflow) or too early (buffer
   overflow).  The metric is applicable both to systems which use packet
   loss repair techniques (such as forward error correction [RFC5109] or
   retransmission [RFC4588]) and to those which do not.

   This metric is useful for identifying the existence, and
   characterising the severity, of a packet transport problem which may
   affect users' perception of a service delivered over RTP.

   The metric belongs to the class of transport-related terminal metrics
   defined in [MONARCH].

1.2.  RTCP and RTCP XR Reports

   The use of RTCP for reporting is defined in [RFC3550].  [RFC3611]
   defined an extensible structure for reporting using an RTCP Extended
   Report (XR).  This document defines a new Extended Report block.  The
   use of Extended Report blocks is defined by [RFC3611].

1.3.  Performance Metrics Framework

   The Performance Metrics Framework [RFC6390] provides guidance on the
   definition and specification of performance metrics.  The RTP
   Monitoring Architectures [MONARCH] provides guideline for reporting
   block format using RTCP XR.  The Metrics Block described in this
   document are in accordance with the guidelines in [RFC6390] and
   [MONARCH].

1.4.  Applicability

   This metric is believed to be applicable to a large class of RTP
   applications which use a jitter buffer.











Hunt, et al.            Expires January 11, 2013                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft               RTCP XR Discard                   July 2012


2.  Terminology

2.1.  Standards Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

   In addition, the following terms are defined:

   Received, Lost and Discarded

      A packet shall be regarded as lost if it fails to arrive within an
      implementation-specific time window.  A packet that arrives within
      this time window but is too early or late to be played out or
      thrown away before playout due to packet duplication or redundancy
      shall be regarded as discarded.  A packet shall be classified as
      one of received (or OK), discarded or lost.  The Discard Count
      Metric counts only discarded packets.  The metric "cumulative
      number of packets lost" defined in [RFC3550] reports a count of
      packets lost from the media stream (single SSRC within single RTP
      session).  Similarly the metric "number of packets discarded"
      reports a count of packets discarded from the media stream (single
      SSRC within single RTP session) arriving at the receiver.  Another
      metric defined in [RFC5725] is available to report on packets
      which are not recovered by any repair techniques which may be in
      use.
























Hunt, et al.            Expires January 11, 2013                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft               RTCP XR Discard                   July 2012


3.  Discard Count Metric Report Block

3.1.  Report Block Structure


        0               1               2               3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |     BT=PDC    | I |DT |  resv.|      block length = 2         |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                        SSRC of Source                         |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                    number of packets discarded                |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                     Figure 1: Report Block Structure

3.2.  Definition of Fields in Discard Count Metric Report Block

   Block type (BT): 8 bits

      A Discard Count Metric Report Block is identified by the constant
      PDC.

      [Note to RFC Editor: please replace PDC with the IANA provided
      RTCP XR block type for this block.]


   Interval Metric flag (I): 2 bits

      This field is used to indicate whether the Discard Count Metric is
      an Interval or Cumulative metric, Sample metric [MONARCH],that is,
      whether the reported values applies to the most recent measurement
      interval duration between successive metrics reports (I=10) (the
      Interval Duration) or to the accumulation period characteristic of
      cumulative measurements (I=11) (the Cumulative Duration) or is a
      sampled instantaneous value (I=01) (Sampled Value).  In this
      document, Discard Count Metric is not measured at a particular
      time instant but over one or several reporting intervals.
      Therefore Discard Count Metric MUST not be chosen as Sampled
      Metric.


   Discard Type (DT): 2bits

      This field is used to identify the discard type used in this
      report block.  The discard type is defined as follows:




Hunt, et al.            Expires January 11, 2013                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft               RTCP XR Discard                   July 2012


         00: Report packet discarded or being thrown away before playout
         due to packets duplication.

         01: Report packet discarded due to too early to be played out.

         10: Report packet discarded due to too late to be played out.

         11: Report the total number of discarded packets due to both
         early and late to be played out.

      An endpoint MAY send only one of the discard types (early, late,
      duplication packets discard) in one RTCP report or choose to
      report early (DT=1) and late (DT=2), duplication packets discard
      (DT=0) in separate block.  It MAY also send the combined early and
      late discard type (DT=2) in one RTCP compound packet, but not any
      other combination of the three Discard Types.  The endpoint MUST
      not report the the total number of discarded packets covering all
      three discard types.  Instead, two separate report blocks should
      be used to carry duplication packets discard and the combined
      early and late discard respectively.


   Reserved (resv): 4 bits

      These bits are reserved.  They SHOULD be set to zero by senders
      and MUST be ignored by receivers.


   block length: 16 bits

      The length of this report block in 32-bit words, minus one.  For
      the Discard Count block, the block length is equal to 2.


   SSRC of source: 32 bits

      As defined in Section 4.1 of [RFC3611].


   number of packets discarded: 32 bits

      Number of packets discarded over the period (Interval or
      Cumulative) covered by this report.

      If the measured value exceeds 0xFFFFFFFD, the value 0xFFFFFFFE
      MUST be reported to indicate an over-range measurement.  If the
      measurement is unavailable, the value 0xFFFFFFFF MUST be reported.




Hunt, et al.            Expires January 11, 2013                [Page 6]


Internet-Draft               RTCP XR Discard                   July 2012


      Note that the number of packets expected in the period associated
      with this metric (whether interval or cumulative) is available
      from the difference between a pair of extended sequence numbers in
      the Measurement Information block [MEASI], so need not be repeated
      in this block.














































Hunt, et al.            Expires January 11, 2013                [Page 7]


Internet-Draft               RTCP XR Discard                   July 2012


4.  SDP Signaling

   [RFC3611] defines the use of SDP (Session Description Protocol)
   [RFC4566] for signaling the use of XR blocks.  XR blocks MAY be used
   without prior signaling.

   This section augments the SDP [RFC4566] attribute "rtcp-xr" defined
   in [RFC3611] by providing an additional value of "xr-format" to
   signal the use of the report block defined in this document.

   rtcp-xr-attrib = "a=" "rtcp-xr" ":" [xr-format *(SP xr-format)] CRLF

   (defined in [RFC3611])

   xr-format =/ xr-pdc-block

    xr-pdc-block = "pkt-dscrd-count"


































Hunt, et al.            Expires January 11, 2013                [Page 8]


Internet-Draft               RTCP XR Discard                   July 2012


5.  IANA Considerations

   New block types for RTCP XR are subject to IANA registration.  For
   general guidelines on IANA considerations for RTCP XR, refer to
   [RFC3611].

5.1.  New RTCP XR Block Type value

   This document assigns the block type value PDC in the IANA "RTCP XR
   Block Type Registry" to the "Discard Count Metrics Block".

   [Note to RFC Editor: please replace PDC with the IANA provided RTCP
   XR block type for this block.]

5.2.  New RTCP XR SDP Parameter

   This document also registers a new parameter "pkt-dscrd" in the "RTCP
   XR SDP Parameters Registry".

5.3.  Contact information for registrations


   The following contact information is provided for all
   registrations in this document:

   Qin Wu (sunseawq@huawei.com)

   101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
   Nanjing, Jiangsu  210012
   China





















Hunt, et al.            Expires January 11, 2013                [Page 9]


Internet-Draft               RTCP XR Discard                   July 2012


6.  Security Considerations

   It is believed that this proposed RTCP XR report block introduces no
   new security considerations beyond those described in [RFC3611].
   This block does not provide per-packet statistics so the risk to
   confidentiality documented in Section 7, paragraph 3 of [RFC3611]
   does not apply.












































Hunt, et al.            Expires January 11, 2013               [Page 10]


Internet-Draft               RTCP XR Discard                   July 2012


7.  Acknowledgments

   The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments and contributions
   made by Bruce Adams, Philip Arden, Amit Arora, Bob Biskner, Kevin
   Connor, Claus Dahm, Randy Ethier, Roni Even, Jim Frauenthal, Albert
   Higashi, Tom Hock, Shane Holthaus, Paul Jones, Rajesh Kumar, Keith
   Lantz, Mohamed Mostafa, Amy Pendleton, Colin Perkins, Mike Ramalho,
   Ravi Raviraj, Albrecht Schwarz, Tom Taylor, and Hideaki Yamada,Kevin
   Gross, Varun Singh,Claire Bi, Roni Even, Dan Romascanu.










































Hunt, et al.            Expires January 11, 2013               [Page 11]


Internet-Draft               RTCP XR Discard                   July 2012


8.  References

8.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", March 1997.

   [RFC3550]  Schulzrinne, H., "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time
              Applications", RFC 3550, July 2003.

   [RFC3611]  Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, "RTP Control
              Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)", November 2003.

   [RFC4566]  Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session
              Description Protocol", July 2006.

8.2.  Informative References

   [MEASI]    Hunt, G., "Measurement Identity and information Reporting
              using SDES item and XR Block",
              ID draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-06,
              April 2012.

   [MONARCH]  Wu, Q., "Monitoring Architectures for RTP",
              ID draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch-12, April 2012.

   [RFC4588]  Rey, J., "RTP Retransmission Payload Format", RFC 4588,
              July 2006.

   [RFC5109]  Li, A., "RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error
              Correction", RFC 5109, July 2006.

   [RFC5725]  Begen, A., "RTCP XR Report Block for Post-Repair Loss
              metric Reporting", RFC 5725, February 2010.

   [RFC6390]  Clark, A. and B. Claise, "Framework for Performance Metric
              Development", RFC 6390, October 2011.














Hunt, et al.            Expires January 11, 2013               [Page 12]


Internet-Draft               RTCP XR Discard                   July 2012


Authors' Addresses

   Geoff Hunt
   Unaffiliated

   Email: r.geoff.hunt@gmail.com


   Alan Clark
   Telchemy Incorporated
   2905 Premiere Parkway, Suite 280
   Duluth, GA  30097
   USA

   Email: alan.d.clark@telchemy.com


   Glen Zorn
   Network Zen
   77/440 Soi Phoomjit, Rama IV Road
   Phra Khanong, Khlong Toie
   Bangkok  10110
   Thailand

   Phone: +66 (0) 87 502 4274
   Email: gwz@net-zen.net


   Qin Wu
   Huawei
   101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
   Nanjing, Jiangsu  210012
   China

   Email: sunseawq@huawei.com
















Hunt, et al.            Expires January 11, 2013               [Page 13]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129c, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/