[Docs] [txt|pdf|xml] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]
Versions: 02 03 04
Network Working Group S. Josefsson
Internet-Draft SJD AB
Intended status: Informational J. Strombergson
Expires: October 11, 2013 Secworks Sweden AB
N. Mavrogiannopoulos
KU Leuven
April 9, 2013
The Salsa20 Stream Cipher for Transport Layer Security
draft-josefsson-salsa20-tls-02
Abstract
This document describe how the Salsa20 stream cipher can be used in
the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer
Security (DTLS) protocols.
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 11, 2013.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
Josefsson, et al. Expires October 11, 2013 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft salsa20tls April 2013
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Salsa20 Cipher Suites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Salsa20 Cipher Suites with HMAC-SHA1 . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. Salsa20 Cipher Suites with UMAC-96 . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. The TLS GenericStreamCipher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Josefsson, et al. Expires October 11, 2013 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft salsa20tls April 2013
1. Introduction
This document describe how the Salsa20 stream cipher can be used in
the Transport Layer Security (TLS) version 1.0 [RFC2246], TLS version
1.1 [RFC4346], and TLS version 1.2 [RFC5246] protocols, as well as in
the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) versions 1.0 [RFC4347]
and 1.2 [RFC6347]. It can also be used with Secure Sockets Layer
(SSL) version 3.0 [RFC6101].
Salsa20 [SALSA20SPEC] is a stream cipher that has been designed for
high performance in software implementations. The cipher has compact
implementation and uses few resources and inexpensive operations that
makes it suitable for implementation on a wide range of
architectures. It has been designed to prevent leakage of
information through side channel analysis, has a simple
initialization sequence and provides good key agility and
performance. Salsa20 is one of the ciphers selected as part of the
eSTREAM portfolio of stream ciphers [ESTREAM].
Recent attacks [CBC-ATTACK] have indicated problems with CBC-mode
cipher suites in TLS and DTLS as well as issues with the only
supported stream cipher (RC4) [RC4-ATTACK]. While the existing AEAD
ciphersuites address these issues, concerns about their performance,
on general purpose CPUs, are sometimes raised [AEAD-PERFORMANCE].
Moreover, the RC4 cipher cannot be used in DTLS because it does not
provide random access in the key stream. That allowed no choice of a
fast stream cipher in the context of DTLS.
The purpose of this document is to provide an alternative stream
cipher for both TLS and DTLS that is comparable to RC4 in speed on a
wide range of platforms.
Josefsson, et al. Expires October 11, 2013 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft salsa20tls April 2013
2. Salsa20 Cipher Suites
The following variants of Salsa20 are specified. The variants
provide a range of performance and security that can be selected as
appropriate.
ESTREAM_SALSA20: Salsa20 with 12 rounds and a 256 bit key. This
cipher is the high performant eSTREAM Salsa20 with 256 bit key.
SALSA20: Salsa20 with 20 rounds and a 256 bit key. This is the
original (conservative with respect to security) variant of
Salsa20.
In the next sections different ciphersuites are defined that utilize
the Salsa20 cipher combined with various MAC methods
In all cases, the pseudorandom function (PRF) for TLS 1.2 is the TLS
PRF with SHA-256 as the hash function. When used with TLS versions
prior to 1.2, the PRF is calculated as specified in the appropriate
version of the TLS specification.
2.1. Salsa20 Cipher Suites with HMAC-SHA1
The following CipherSuites are defined:
TLS_RSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_RSA_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
Note that Salsa20 requires a 64-bit nonce. That nonce is updated on
the encryption of every TLS record, and is set to be the 64-bit TLS
record sequence number. In case of DTLS the 64-bit nonce is formed
as the concatenation of the 16-bit epoch with the 48-bit sequence
number.
Josefsson, et al. Expires October 11, 2013 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft salsa20tls April 2013
The RSA, DHE_RSA, ECDHE_RSA, ECDHE_ECDSA, PSK, DHE_PSK, RSA_PSK,
ECDHE_PSK key exchanges are performed as defined in [RFC5246],
[RFC4492], and [RFC5489].
The MAC algorithm used in the ciphersuites above is HMAC-SHA1
[RFC6234].
2.2. Salsa20 Cipher Suites with UMAC-96
The following CipherSuites utilize Salsa20 in combination with
UMAC-96 [RFC4418], a very fast MAC algorithm based on Universal
Hashing.
TLS_RSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_RSA_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
Note that both Salsa20 and UMAC-96 are used with a 64-bit nonce.
That nonce is set to be the 64-bit TLS record sequence number. In
case of DTLS the 64-bit nonce is formed as the concatenation of the
16-bit epoch with the 48-bit sequence number.
The RSA, DHE_RSA, ECDHE_RSA, ECDHE_ECDSA, PSK, DHE_PSK, RSA_PSK,
ECDHE_PSK key exchanges are performed as defined in [RFC5246],
[RFC4492], and [RFC5489].
Josefsson, et al. Expires October 11, 2013 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft salsa20tls April 2013
3. The TLS GenericStreamCipher
The ciphersuites defined in this document differ from the TLS RC4
ciphersuites that have been the basis for the definition of
GenericStreamCipher. Unlike RC4, Salsa20 requires a nonce per
record. This however, does not affect the description of the
GenericStreamCipher if one assumes that a nonce is optional and
depends on the cipher's characteristics (in that case RC4 uses a 0
byte nonce, and Salsa20 an 8-byte nonce).
Moreover, in order to accommodate MAC algorithms like UMAC that
require a nonce as part of their operation, the document extends the
MAC algorithm as specified in the TLS protocol. The extended MAC
includes a nonce as a second parameter. MAC algorithms that do not
require a nonce, such as HMAC, are assumed to ignore the nonce input
value. The MAC in a GenericStreamCipher is then calculated as
follows.
MAC(MAC_write_key, nonce,
seq_num +
TLSCompressed.type +
TLSCompressed.version +
TLSCompressed.length +
TLSCompressed.fragment);
where "+" denotes concatenation.
nonce The nonce for this record. If the size of the nonce accepted
by the MAC is 64-bits then nonce equals the sequence number (or
the concatenation of the 16-bit epoch with the 48-bit sequence
number in DTLS). Otherwise the MAC algorithm must specify how the
nonce is formed.
seq_num The sequence number for this record.
MAC The MAC algorithm specified by SecurityParameters.mac_algorithm.
As specified in TLS [RFC5246] the MAC is computed before encryption
and the stream cipher encrypts the entire block, including the MAC.
Josefsson, et al. Expires October 11, 2013 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft salsa20tls April 2013
4. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank D. J. Bernstein, David McGrew, Wan-
Teh Chang, and Adam Langley for discussion and suggestions.
Josefsson, et al. Expires October 11, 2013 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft salsa20tls April 2013
5. IANA Considerations
IANA is requested to allocate the following numbers in the TLS Cipher
Suite Registry:
TLS_RSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_RSA_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_SHA1 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_RSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_RSA_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_ESTREAM_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_SALSA20_UMAC96 = {0xTBD, 0xTBD}
Josefsson, et al. Expires October 11, 2013 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft salsa20tls April 2013
6. Security Considerations
The security of Salsa20 is discussed in the Salsa20 security
[SALSA20-SECURITY] paper. At the time of writing this document,
there are no known significant security problems with the eSTREAM
variant of Salsa20, nor with the original 20 round variant. As of
early 2013, the best cryptanalysis breaks 8 out of 20 rounds to
recover the 256-bit secret key in 2^251 operations, using 2^31
keystream pairs (see [SALSA20-ATTACK]). For more background, see the
eSTREAM report [ESTREAM].
There are no ciphersuites defined in this document that utilize the
variant of Salsa20 with 128-bit key material, because (due to the
design of Salsa20) they provide no performance advantage over the
256-bit variant.
The ciphersuites that utilize UMAC-96 use a short MAC (96-bits), to
be consistent with the MAC size used in the TLS Finished messages,
which is also 96-bits, and thus allow room for more data in TLS
records. The security considerations of [RFC4418] also apply.
This document should not introduce any other security considerations
than those that directly follow from any use of the stream cipher
Salsa20 and those that directly follow from introducing any set of
stream cipher suites into TLS and DTLS.
Josefsson, et al. Expires October 11, 2013 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft salsa20tls April 2013
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[RFC2246] Dierks, T. and C. Allen, "The TLS Protocol Version 1.0",
RFC 2246, January 1999.
[RFC4346] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
(TLS) Protocol Version 1.1", RFC 4346, April 2006.
[RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
(TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246, August 2008.
[RFC4347] Rescorla, E. and N. Modadugu, "Datagram Transport Layer
Security", RFC 4347, April 2006.
[RFC4418] Krovetz, T., "UMAC: Message Authentication Code using
Universal Hashing", RFC 4418, March 2006.
[RFC4492] Blake-Wilson, S., Bolyard, N., Gupta, V., Hawk, C., and B.
Moeller, "Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites
for Transport Layer Security (TLS)", RFC 4492, May 2006.
[RFC5489] Badra, M. and I. Hajjeh, "ECDHE_PSK Cipher Suites for
Transport Layer Security (TLS)", RFC 5489, March 2009.
[RFC6347] Rescorla, E. and N. Modadugu, "Datagram Transport Layer
Security Version 1.2", RFC 6347, January 2012.
[RFC6234] Eastlake, D. and T. Hansen, "US Secure Hash Algorithms
(SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)", RFC 6234, May 2011.
[SALSA20SPEC]
Bernstein, D., "Salsa20 specification",
WWW http://cr.yp.to/snuffle/spec.pdf, April 2005.
7.2. Informative References
[RFC6101] Freier, A., Karlton, P., and P. Kocher, "The Secure
Sockets Layer (SSL) Protocol Version 3.0", RFC 6101,
August 2011.
[SALSA20-SECURITY]
Bernstein, D., "Salsa20 security",
WWW http://cr.yp.to/snuffle/security.pdf, April 2005.
[ESTREAM] Babbage, S., DeCanniere, C., Cantenaut, A., Cid, C.,
Gilbert, H., Johansson, T., Parker, M., Preneel, B.,
Josefsson, et al. Expires October 11, 2013 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft salsa20tls April 2013
Rijmen, V., and M. Robshaw, "The eSTREAM Portfolio (rev.
1)", WWW http://www.ecrypt.eu.org/stream/finallist.html,
September 2008.
[CBC-ATTACK]
AlFardan, N. and K. Paterson, "Lucky Thirteen: Breaking
the TLS and DTLS Record Protocols", IEEE Symposium on
Security and Privacy , 2013.
[RC4-ATTACK]
ISOBE, T., OHIGASHI, T., WATANABE, Y., and M. MORII, "Full
Plaintext Recovery Attack on Broadcast RC4", International
Workshop on Fast Software Encryption , 2013.
[AEAD-PERFORMANCE]
Krovetz, T. and P. Rogaway, "The Software Performance of
Authenticated-Encryption Modes", International Workshop on
Fast Software Encryption , 2011.
[SALSA20-ATTACK]
Aumasson, J-P., Fischer, S., Khazaei, S., Meier, W., and
C. Rechberger, "New Features of Latin Dances: Analysis of
Salsa, ChaCha, and Rumba",
WWW http://eprint.iacr.org/2007/472.pdf, 2007.
Josefsson, et al. Expires October 11, 2013 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft salsa20tls April 2013
Authors' Addresses
Simon Josefsson
SJD AB
Email: simon@josefsson.org
URI: http://josefsson.org/
Joachim Strombergson
Secworks Sweden AB
Email: joachim@secworks.se
URI: http://secworks.se/
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
KU Leuven
Email: nikos.mavrogiannopoulos@esat.kuleuven.be
Josefsson, et al. Expires October 11, 2013 [Page 12]
Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.126, available from
https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/