[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [Email] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02 03 04 05

Internet Research Task Force                             Gyu Myoung Lee
Internet Draft                                         Institut TELECOM
Intended status: Informational                             Jungsoo Park
Expires: April 2011                                                ETRI
                                                              Ning Kong
                                                                  CNNIC
                                                            Noel Crespi
                                                       Institut TELECOM
                                                       October 18, 2010


           The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement
                  draft-lee-iot-problem-statement-00.txt


Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.  This document may contain material
   from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly
   available before November 10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the
   copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF
   Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the
   IETF Standards Process.  Without obtaining an adequate license from
   the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this
   document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and
   derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards
   Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to
   translate it into languages other than English.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html

   This Internet-Draft will expire on April 18, 2011.






Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                 [Page 1]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011




Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully,
   as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this
   document.



































Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                 [Page 2]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011


Abstract

   This document explains the concept of the Internet of Things and
   several characteristics of objects. In addition, this document
   investigates key technical issues and specifies problems for the IoT.

Conventions used in this document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119.





































Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                 [Page 3]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011




Table of Contents


   1. Introduction ................................................ 5
   2. Concept of IoT .............................................. 5
      2.1. Basic concept of the IoT................................ 5
      2.2. Classification and characteristics of objects........... 6
      2.3. Purpose / applications.................................. 7
   3. Features of the IoT ......................................... 8
      3.1. Overall aspects......................................... 8
      3.2. Applications/services aspects........................... 8
      3.3. Networking aspects...................................... 8
      3.4. Link/physical layer aspects............................. 8
      3.5. Smart/connected objects aspects......................... 8
      3.6. Smart environment aspects (home/office/building, etc)... 8
   4. General issues .............................................. 8
   5. Problems .................................................... 11
      5.1. Identifier for objects and services .................... 11
      5.2. Object naming .......................................... 11
      5.3. Security/privacy/authority ............................. 12
      5.4. Presence (of people; of devices) ....................... 13
      5.5. Geographic location (self identification of location)... 13
      5.6. Discovery/search........................................ 13
      5.7. Tracking of mobile object .............................. 13
      5.8. Data processing /computing ............................. 13
      5.9. Heterogeneous networking interfaces (IP and non-IP, etc) 14
      5.10. Global connectivity (IPv6) ............................ 14
      5.11. Scalability ........................................... 14
      5.12. Universal interoperability ............................ 14
      5.13. Autonomics (self-configuring, intelligence for control) 14
      5.14. Power/energy storage .................................. 15
      5.15. Coordination among many objects ....................... 15
      5.16. Web Services .......................................... 15
   6. Summary and future work ..................................... 15
   7. Security Considerations ..................................... 15
   8. IANA Considerations ......................................... 15
   9. References .................................................. 16
      9.1. Normative References ................................... 16
      9.2. Informative References ................................. 16
   Appendix I: Case study on typical use cases of the IoT.......... 16
   Appendix II: Relationships with existing working groups in IETF. 16
   Author's Addresses ............................................. 17





Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                 [Page 4]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011




1. Introduction

   The Internet of Things (IoT) [1-3] is a novel paradigm that is
   becoming popular with research and industries. The basic idea is that
   IoT will connect objects around us (electronic, electrical, non
   electrical) to provide seamless communication and contextual services
   provided by them. Development of RFID tags, sensors, actuators,
   mobile phones make it possible to materialize IoT which interact and
   co-operate each other to make the service better and accessible
   anytime, from anywhere.
   There are so many applications that are possible because of IoT. For
   individual users, IoT brings useful applications like home automation,
   security, automated devices monitoring, and management of daily tasks.
   For professionals, automated applications provide useful contextual
   information all the time to help on their works and decision making.
   Industries, with sensors and actuators operations can be rapid,
   efficient and more economic. Managers who need to keep eye on many
   things can automate tasks connection digital and physical objects
   together. Every sectors energy, computing, management, security,
   transportation are going to be benefitted with this new paradigm.
   Development of several technologies made it possible to achieve the
   vision of Internet of things. Identification technology such as RFID
   allows each object to represent uniquely by having unique identifier.
   Identity reader can read any time the object allows real time
   identification and tracking. Wireless sensor technology allows
   objects to provide real time environmental condition and context.
   Smart technologies allow objects to become more intelligent which can
   think and communicate. Nanotechnologies are helping to reduce the
   size of the chip incorporating more processing power and
   communication capabilities in a very small chip.
   This document explains the concept of the Internet of Things and
   several characteristics of objects. In addition, this document
   investigates key technical issues and specifies problems for the IoT.
   The main objective of this document is to develop a new architectural
   framework in order to solve problems.



2. Concept of IoT

2.1. Basic concept of the IoT

   o Definition of the "IoT"


Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                 [Page 5]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011


      Internet: The original "Internet" is based on the TCP/IP protocol
      suite but any network based on the TCP/IP protocol suite cannot
      belong to the Internet because private networks and
      Telecommunication networks are not part of the Internet even
      though they are based on the TCP/IP protocol suite. In the
      viewpoint of IoT, the "Internet" considers the TCP/IP suite and
      non-TCP/IP suite at the same time.



   o Definition and scope of "things"

      In the vision of IoT, "things" are very various such as computers,
      sensors, people, actuators, refrigerators, TVs, vehicles, mobile
      phones, clothes, food, medicines, books, etc. These things are
      classified as three scopes: people, machine (for example, sensor,
      actuator, etc) and information (for example clothes, food,
      medicine, books and etc). These "things" should be identified at
      least by one unique way of identification for the capability of
      addressing and communicating with each other and verifying their
      identities. In here, if the "thing" is identified, we call it the
      "object."



   o Terminologies

   o Goals (new architecture/framework) and vision

2.2. Classification and characteristics of objects

   Many studies are going on regarding IoT which is going to be an
   advanced network including normal physical objects together with
   computers and other advanced electronic appliances. Instead of
   forming ad hoc network, normal objects will be a part of whole
   network so that they can collaborate, understand real time
   environmental data and react accordingly in need.



   Objects can be classified as follows.

   o Size: small, normal

   o Mobility: mobile, fixed

   o Power: without power supply, with power supply


Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                 [Page 6]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011


   o Connectivity: intermittently connected, continuously connected

   o Automation: automated, non automated

   o Physical/logical: physical objects, logical objects

   o Network protocol: IP enabled objects, non IP objects



   Objects have the following characteristics.

   o Ability to sense and/or actuate

   o Small (or not necessarily)

   o Limited capability (or not necessarily)

   o Energy/power limited

   o Connected to physical world

   o Intermittent connectivity

   o Mobile (potentially)

   o Of interest to people

   o Managed by devices, not people



2.3. Purpose / applications

   o Body area network (bio-medical, etc)

   o Smart Grid

   o Building networks

   o Vehicles (inter and intra)

   o RFID/Asset-tracking

   o Manufacturing

   o Environmental sensors


Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                 [Page 7]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011


   o Revealing/sharing information



3. Features of the IoT

3.1. Overall aspects

   (Order(s) of magnitude bigger than the Internet, No computers or
   humans at endpoint, Inherently mobile, disconnected, unattended)

3.2. Applications/services aspects

3.3. Networking aspects

3.4. Link/physical layer aspects

3.5. Smart/connected objects aspects

3.6. Smart environment aspects (home/office/building, etc)



4. General issues

   o Scalability

      The IoT has larger overall scope than communications with
      conventional hosts. There will be small (home environment) or
      large scale (factory, building) application area. Objects
      communicate with each other and with people seamlessly. Each
      constituent might be offering different services. Basic
      functionalities such as communication, service discovery need to
      be functioning efficiently in both small and large scale
      environment. Scalability regarding addressing can be taken as an
      example. IPv4 address is finishing, object-to-object communication
      needs huge number of IP addresses in order to uniquely identify
      each objects. As a scalable solution, IPv6 can be used which can
      accommodate as many things as required to include in the IoT.

   o Interoperability








Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                 [Page 8]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011


      World of physical objects is extremely diverse. They have
      different communication, information and processing capabilities.
      Each object would also be subjected to very different conditions
      such as power energy availability and communication bandwidth
      requirement. In order to facilitate communication and cooperation
      common practices and standards are required. Interoperability
      issue includes device, services heterogeneities. Devices are small,
      large, with continuously powered, without power supply.
      Interoperability solution should be maintained to provide seamless
      interaction among them. Service description, publishing, and
      discovery mechanisms should be interoperable otherwise the IoT
      will be converted into islands of heterogeneous object network.

   o Discovery

      In dynamic environment of ubiquitous networking, suitable services
      for objects must be automatically identified. As users want to
      know product information and their availability all the time, it
      requires appropriate semantic means of describing their
      functionality.

   o Data volumes

      Depending on application and use cases there is variance in data
      volume. In a scenario where there is brief collaboration among
      objects data volume will be less. However, in case where there are
      large number of objects and interact among very frequently there
      are large volume of data. How to handle big volume of data is one
      of the important challenges of ubiquitous networking. Volume can
      be considered either from device or as a whole network perspective.
      Each object has augmented memory, storage and processing
      capability. If there are a large number of peer objects
      communicating with each other, object runs out of processing,
      memory and storage. From network perspective it is also difficult
      to handle bulk amount of data if objects produce huge bytes of
      data regularly. Solution can be periodic communication between
      objects or some data compression and optimization techniques.

   o Power supply









Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                 [Page 9]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011


      Scope of object is broad in the IoT. It ranges from small to large.
      Moreover, things move around and difficult to connect to power
      supply all the time. So they need to operate with self-sufficient
      energy source. Passive RFID does not contain power supply, which
      requires reader in order to get information from it. Not all
      objects can be connected to continuous power supply also,
      providing battery for each small object may not be feasible.
      Therefore, energy efficient communication mechanisms are essential.

   o Fault-tolerance

      The IoT consists of objects have less power. They are more dynamic
      and mobile compare to current state. However, users rely and
      believe that network will function properly. To maintain robust
      and trust worthy dynamic ubiquitous networking requires redundancy
      in several levels and ability to automatically adapt to changed
      conditions depending on the required quality of service.

   o Security and personal privacy

      Users are fighting with security and privacy issue of current
      Internet in large extent. When it will be broaden in to ubiquitous
      networking, there is even more threat of security and personal
      privacy. Confidentiality, authenticity and trustworthiness of
      communication partners need to be maintained. Users may want to
      give things limited service access not allowing them to
      communicate in uncontrolled manner.

   o Device adaptation

      Initially started with retail and logistic application, the IoT is
      covering very general applications scenario integrating things to
      the network. It allows objects to collaborate each other and with
      person. There are heterogeneous devices, application scenarios,
      data format, and communication network. Each connected objects
      should be able to adapt the situation where it is now. When a
      person with smart phone enters home, it should adapt communication
      mechanism, addressing and localized environment. When it reaches
      in office environment it should adapt with new situation where the
      mechanisms available in home can be different. Adaption in many
      senses should be maintained.

   o Intelligence






Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                [Page 10]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011


      The smart objects should be able to intelligently co-operate with
      the environment in which it will be introduced. Sensing current
      environment, acting intelligently according to situation is
      required in order to realize true object-to-object communication.
      The IoT makes possible for virtually any object around us to
      exchange information and work in synergy to increase quality of
      our life. There are smart clothes which will interact
      intelligently with climate control of car and home to select the
      most suitable temperature and humidity for the person. Smart book
      interacts with entertainment devices such as TV in order to
      elaborate the topic we are reading. Most of the devices act
      according to their predetermined set of actions or they will
      collaborate with each other based on current context and act
      accordingly.



5. Problems

5.1. Identifier for objects and services

   There are various kinds of identifier with different identification
   codes according to objects and their services. Current identification
   schemes for objects are also different from their purposes.

   Solution:

   o Identification (new naming space, globally unique ID)

      With the huge evolved communication objects, the hierarchical
      identification schemes are required. The aggregation feature of
      IPv6 address is one of example.

      According to the classification of Things, the different
      identification schemes are required. That is, the information such
      as books, medicine and clothes may not require the global
      identification because revocation lists are required. It means
      some objects will be destroyed.



5.2. Object naming

   Current Internet just identifies the specific server which contents
   are stored. As the end points of current Internet are hosts,
   individual content in a server cannot be identified in the network.



Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                [Page 11]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011


   Solution:

   o Naming/addressing for fixed/mobile objects



   Object naming services

   The name service of Internet such as DNS (Domain Name System)
   [RFC1034] has already been one of the most important infrastructures
   of the Internet nowadays. For example, DNS is an indispensable system
   of the Internet used for translating the "human-friendly" host names
   of computers on a TCP/IP network into their corresponding "machine-
   friendly" IP addresses. In general, DNS also stores other types of
   information, such as the list of mail servers that accept email for a
   given Internet domain. By providing a worldwide, distributed name
   service, DNS is an essential component of the functionality of the
   Internet.

   Similarly, object name service will also be one of essential and key
   elements in the IoT, which can be used for translating the "thing-
   friendly" names of object which maybe belong to heterogeneous name
   spaces (e.g. EPC, uCode, and any other self-defined code) on
   different networks (e.g. TCP/IP network, constrained network) into
   their corresponding "machine-friendly" addresses or other related
   information of another TCP/IP or constrained network. The object of
   IoT based on a TCP/IP or constrained network can easily communicate
   with other object on the same or any other network with the name of
   the object by object name service, without considering whether the
   address of the targeted object has been changed or not.

   To fulfill the aforementioned objective, object naming service based
   on the IoT needs to be researched. The compatibility of heterogeneous
   name spaces and the efficiency for the constrained network of this
   kind of service are supposed to be the most important issues to be
   studied in future.



5.3. Security/privacy/authority

   The loss of security and privacy in communications and services, with
   personal data is becoming available and unwanted communication
   becoming rampant.

   The overall problem is further aggravated by the diversification of
   the Internet with new types of devices and heterogeneous networks.


Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                [Page 12]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011


   The user is confronted with a wide range of methods and devices with
   which to access the digital world, and it can no longer be assumed
   that a single, independent access per device will suffice, nor that
   the user will actually own all these devices.

   Solution:

   o ID-management for things (security, authentication, privacy)

      Basically each object should not be able to authenticate during
      the short time because the hundreds of objects may request the
      approval at the same time. Therefore, group authentication and
      authorization methods are required.



5.4. Presence (of people; of devices)

5.5. Geographic location (self identification of location)



   o awareness of location



5.6. Discovery/search

5.7. Tracking of mobile object

   Solution:

   o TBD

      To support the routing and mobility protocols, the IoT networks
      have structural characteristics. That is, the mobility support
      models are required. Some objects move independently. Others will
      move as the one of group. Therefore, according the moving feature,
      the different tracking methods are required.



5.8. Data processing /computing

   For supporting various applications in the IoT environment,
   information should be able to transfer among objects operating under
   varied perspectives without humans.


Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                [Page 13]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011


   Solutions

   o Information model (data store, retrieval, transfer, etc)

      According the Information model, the functionality of data
      processing should be distinguished.

   o Policy/preferences



5.9. Heterogeneous networking interfaces (IP and non-IP, etc)



   o Interworking model with proxy (gateway)

      Each gateway should support the multiple interfaces, which are
      evolved in different heterogeneous network.



5.10. Global connectivity (IPv6)

      Each object should support the end-to-end communications. And also
      outside-initiated services may be supported into the inner network.



5.11. Scalability

      In IETF LISP, Shim6 and Other WG, ID/LOC separation methods have
      been developing. For more scalable and robust network, ID/LOC
      separation features are required.



5.12. Universal interoperability

5.13. Autonomics (self-configuring, intelligence for control)



   o Remote control and management/maintenance of objects





Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                [Page 14]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011


      IPv6 auto-configuration and multi-homing features are useful for
      the autonomics. The scope-based IPv6 addressing features are
      easily applied for self-configuration such as smart building and
      smart grid.



5.14. Power/energy storage

5.15. Coordination among many objects

      Like the Full-function device (FFD) and Reduced Function Devices
      (RFD) in sensor network, the objects of IoT should be classified
      in viewpoint of functionalities.



5.16. Web Services

      Each object may be identified through the web services. It means
      that the object should be identified by the URL/URL.



6. Summary and future work

   This document has explained the concept of the Internet of Things and
   several characteristics of objects. In addition, this document has
   investigated key technical issues and specifies problems for the IoT.

   For future work, we need to find possible solutions for each problem.
   It would be a good starting point to develop a new architectural
   framework in order to solve problems.



7. Security Considerations

   TBD



8. IANA Considerations

   This document has no actions for IANA.




Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                [Page 15]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011


9. References

9.1. Normative References

   TBD

9.2. Informative References

   [1]  ITU-T Internet Reports, "Internet of Things," November 2005.

   [2]  Zouganeli E., Svinnset, I.E, "Connected objects and the
         Internet of things-a paradigm shift," Photonics in Switching
         2009, September 2009.

   [3]  Harald Sundmaeker, Patrick Guilemin, Peter Friess, Sylvie
         Woelffle, "Vision and challenges for realizing the Internet of
         Things," March 2010.

   [4]  Luigi Atzori, Antonio Iera, Giacomo Morabito, "The Internet of
         Things: A survey," Computer Networks, Volume 54, Issue 15,
         pp.2787-2805, October 2010.



Appendix I: Case study on typical use cases of the IoT

   TBD

Appendix II: Relationships with existing working groups in IETF

   o 6LoWPAN (IPv6 header compression)

   o ROLL (IPv6 routing for low power/lossy networks)

   o Core (Constrained RESTful Environments, former 6LoWApp (Low power
      applications) BoF)

   o RRG (Routing research group)

   o HIPRG (Host identity protocol research group)









Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                [Page 16]


      The Internet of Things - Concept and Problem Statement   April 2011


Author's Addresses

   Gyu Myoung Lee
   Institut TELECOM, TELECOM SudParis
   9 rue Charles Fourier, 91011, Evry, France

   Phone: +33 (0)1 60 76 41 19
   Email: gm.lee@it-sudparis.eu


   Jungsoo Park
   ETRI/SRC
   161 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-700, Korea

   Phone: +82 42 860 6514
   Email: fnumber@gmail.com


   Ning Kong
   CNNIC
   4 South 4th Street, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing, 100190,
   China.

   Phone: +86 10 5881 3147
   Email: nkong@cnnic.cn


   Noel Crespi
   Institut TELECOM, TELECOM SudParis
   9 rue Charles Fourier, 91011, Evry, France

   Phone: +33 (0)1 60 76 46 23
   Email: noel.crespi@it-sudparis.eu















Lee, et al.            Expires April 18, 2011                [Page 17]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129c, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/