[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits] [IPR]
Versions: 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
Lemonade
Internet Draft: P-IMAP S. H. Maes
Document: draft-maes-lemonade-p-imap-12 C. Kuang
R. Lima
R. Cromwell
E. Chiu
J. Day
R. Ahad
Oracle Corporation
Wook-Hyun Jeong
Samsung
Electronics Co.,
LTD
Gustaf Rosell
Sony Ericsson
J. Sini
-
Sung-Mu Son
LGE
Fan Xiaohui
Zhao Lijun
China Mobile
D. Bennett
Consilient
Expires: September 2006 March 2006
Push Extensions to the IMAP Protocol (P-IMAP)
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
Maes [Page 1]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
Abstract
Push Extensions to the IMAP protocol (P-IMAP) defines extensions to
the IMAPv4 Rev1 protocol [RFC3501] for optimization in a mobile
setting, aimed at delivering extended functionality for mobile
devices with limited resources. The first enhancement of P-IMAP is
extended support to push changes actively to a client, rather then
requiring the client to initiate contact to ask for state changes.
In addition, P-IMAP contains extensions for email filter management,
message delivery, and maintaining up-to-date personal information.
Bindings to specific transport are explicitly defined. Eventually P-
IMAP aims at being neutral to the network transport neutrality.
P-IMAP is a recommendation for interoperable intermediate
implementations awaiting [LEMONADEPROFILEBIS] or the realization of
the OMA MEM enabler using it.
Conventions used in this document
In examples, "C:" and "S:" indicate lines sent by the client and
server respectively.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more
of the MUST or REQUIRED level requirements for the protocol(s) it
implements. An implementation that satisfies all the MUST or REQUIRED
level and all the SHOULD level requirements for a protocol is said to
be "unconditionally compliant" to that protocol; one that satisfies
all the MUST level requirements but not all the SHOULD level
requirements is said to be "conditionally compliant." When
describing the general syntax, some definitions are omitted as they
are defined in [RFC3501].
Table of Contents
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 2]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
Status of this Memo...............................................1
Copyright Notice..................................................2
Abstract..........................................................2
Conventions used in this document.................................2
Table of Contents.................................................2
1. Introduction...................................................4
1.1. The Poll Model vs. the Push Model.........................5
1.2. Synchronization Techniques................................6
1.2.1. State-Comparison-Based Synchronization...............6
1.2.2. Event-based Synchronization..........................8
1.2.3. Reconnecting in a same session.......................8
1.2.3. Clarification note on the term P-IMAP Session......9
1.3. The Server-Side Filtering in P-IMAP......................10
1.4. Extra Functionality in P-IMAP............................11
2. Relation with the Lemonade Profile and other E-mail
specifications..............................................12
3. The P-IMAP Design.............................................13
3.1. Implementing Filters.....................................13
3.1.1. The View Filter.....................................14
3.1.2. The Notification Filter.............................14
3.1.3. The Event Filter....................................14
3.2. Connectivity Models......................................15
3.2.1. In-Response Connectivity............................15
3.2.2. In-band Connectivity................................15
3.2.3. Out-of-band Connectivity............................16
3.3. Recommended Connectivity Models..........................17
3.4. Keeping the Client In Sync with the Mobile Repository....17
4. Events........................................................18
4.1. Message Events Sent During In-band and In-response Mode..18
5. Interactions between the P-IMAP Client and P-IMAP Server......19
5.1. Revisions to IMAPv4 Rev1 Behavior........................21
5.1.1. Mobile Repository...................................21
5.1.2. The CAPABILITY Command..............................21
5.1.3. P-IMAP Session/Login................................22
5.1.4. IDLE................................................23
5.1.5. XENCRYPTED..........................................23
5.2. Registering with the server..............................24
5.3. P-IMAP Extension Commands and Responses..................25
5.3.1. XPROVISION..........................................26
5.3.2. XSETPIMAPPREF & XGETPIMAPPREFS......................27
5.3.3. XZIP................................................29
5.3.4. XDELIVER............................................30
5.3.5. IMAPURL extensions..................................30
5.3.6. The XDELIVER command................................31
5.3.7. Note on XDELIVER, SMTP and Lemonade Profile.........32
5.3.8. XCONVERT BODY and BINARY data item extension........32
5.3.9. FETCH response extensions...........................34
5.3.10. Status responses, Response code extensions.........34
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 3]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
5.3.11. Formal Syntax......................................35
5.3.12. XVFOLDER...........................................36
6. Considerations beyond the P-IMAP protocol.....................38
6.1. P-IMAP client security...................................38
6.2. P-IMAP client updates....................................38
6.3. P-IMAP client-side behavior..............................38
6.4. Minimum binding interoperability requirements............39
Security Considerations..........................................39
References.......................................................39
Normative Appendices.............................................42
A. Implementation Guidelines for Using HTTP with P-IMAP.......42
A.1. Non-Persistent HTTP for In-response Connectivity Mode.46
A.2. Using Persistent HTTP/HTTPS + Chunked Transfer
Encoding for In-band Connectivity Mode..............47
A.3. Using HTTP CONNECT....................................48
B. Event Payload..............................................49
B.1. Event Payload in Clear Text for P-IMAP Sessions.......49
B.2. Out-of-band Channel Event Payload.....................49
B.3. Out-of-band SMS channel binding.......................51
C. Security Issues for Proxy-Based Implementations of P-IMAP..52
D. XCONVERT transcoding parameters............................53
E. Note on XDELIVER, SMTP and Lemonade Profile................54
Non-Normative Appendices.........................................54
F. Use Cases..................................................54
F.1. State Comparison-Based Sync...........................54
F.2. Event-Based Sync......................................55
G. Other Issues...............................................56
G.1. Using a Side Channel for a P-IMAP session.............56
G.2. Client event filtering................................56
Future Work......................................................57
Version History..................................................57
Acknowledgments..................................................65
Authors Addresses................................................65
Intellectual Property Statement..................................67
Disclaimer of Validity...........................................67
Copyright Statement..............................................68
Acknowledgement..................................................68
1.
Introduction
The Push-IMAP protocol (P-IMAP) is based on IMAPv4 Rev1 [RFC3501],
but contains additional enhancements for optimization in a mobile
setting. Thus, the client devices in this document are assumed to be
mobile with limited resources. P-IMAP takes into account the limited
resources of mobile devices, as well as extra functionality desired.
This document covers key P-IMAP concepts, defines the syntax and
functionality of the server and client, as well as provides examples
of interactions within the protocol. P-IMAP can be bound to any
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 4]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
transport protocol for in-band and out-of-band connectivity. Appendix
A provides a normative binding to HTTP.
The organization of this document is as follows. The rest of this
section introduces the core enhancements of P-IMAP so the reader can
gain an understanding of the concepts that drive this design.
Section 2 positions P-IMAP and the Lemonade Pull Model described in
[LEMONADEPROFILE]. Section 3 discusses actual design decisions for
P-IMAP. Section 4 defines the bindings for expressing events, while
Section 5 is the main body of the protocol, which describes the
interactions between the P-IMAP server and client. Next are sections
concerning the formal syntax, security considerations, and
references. Finally, there are normative and non-normative
appendices, which provide useful information for those who wish to
implement the P-IMAP protocol. The normative appendices, including
Appendices A, B, and C cover some extra guidelines needed to support
implementation level issues. The non-normative appendices, D and E,
provide interesting use cases and examples.
1.1.
The Poll Model vs. the Push Model
Today, most of the existing email clients implement a polling model,
where the end user is notified of changes to an email account only
after the email client polls the server for changes. How long it
takes a client to learn of a change on the server is thus dependent
on how often the client polls for changes. Many clients can poll at
high rates so that the client can quickly learn of changes and
reflect them on the client display to achieve a quasi-real time
synchronization experience for the end user. The periodic poll model
is used on conventional email clients. Because the client must
continuously poll the server for changes, the bandwidth requirements
can be quite high and the connection quality must be good in order to
provide a quasi-real time experience to the user. This also
generates additional load on the IMAP server. The periodic poll
model is illustrated in Figure 1.
+--------------------+ Poll +--------------+
| | <------------ | |
| Mail Server | | Email Client |
| | ------------> | |
+--------------------+ Response +--------------+
Figure 1: Periodic Poll Model
Another way to achieve synchronization is for the email server to
tell the client when a crucial change to an email occurs, which is
the push model. When important events happen to a user's email
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 5]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
account, the server informs the client device about the event, and
then the client can respond to that event as necessary. In this
case, the client device does not need to periodically poll the mail
server, so the push model is particularly effective in the mobile
computing environment when the cost of constant polling is high. The
P-IMAP protocol defines the semantics for pushing events to a client.
The push model is seen in Figure 2.
Event +----------------+ Push +--------------+
--------> | Mail Server | ---------> | Email Client |
+----------------+ +--------------+
Figure 2: Push Model
1.2.
Synchronization Techniques
After a client receives a notification that informs it that changes
have occurred to a mailbox, it needs to employ a synchronization
technique to reflect the server side changes onto the client device
and the client device changes onto the server side. There are many
techniques for determining what the changes between a server and
client are. In this section, two techniques are presented that aim
to keep a client device in sync with a given email account, meaning
that the set of messages on the client device is the same as that in
the given email account.
1.2.1. State-Comparison-Based Synchronization
IMAPv4Rev1 clients use a state-comparison-based synchronization
technique to be in sync with an email account. This technique is used
when the client device connects to the server and establishes a new
session. This technique requires the client to ask the server for
information regarding all the folders and all the messages in each
folder stored on the server. Client changes must be applied on the
server first. The client must then compute the difference between
the server state and the client device state, and make all necessary
changes so that the client device state matches the server state. An
non-optimal but illustrative example of the interaction between the
client and server in the IMAPv4 Rev1 protocol for performing a state-
comparison-based sync follows.
First, the client must retrieve a list of interesting folders from
the server. The client should issue LIST to figure out which folders
have to be retrieved. It could then use LSUB to determine which
folders are subscribed. For example:
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 6]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
C: A002 LIST "" "%"
S: * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" "Drafts"
S: * LIST () "/" "Friends"
S: * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" "INBOX"
S: A002 OK completed
C: A002 LSUB "" "*"
S: * LSUB () "/" "Drafts"
S: * LSUB () "/" "Friends"
S: * LSUB () "/" "INBOX"
S: A002 OK LSUB completed
After applying the changes from the client to the server, the client
must compare its folders with the responses of the command above. If
it does not have a folder, it must create that folder on the client
device. If there is a folder on the device that is not in any of
these responses, then the client may delete or keep that folder. In
order to avoid losing changes performed on the client, the client
should apply its changes first. In case when the client has changes
to a folder that was deleted on the server, it should ask the user
whether the changes should be uploaded to a different folder or be
discarded (or be configured to automatically do one of the two).
Next, the client needs to make sure that the emails in each of its
folders match the server. It performs a SELECT and then a FETCH
command for each folder. A sample of a SELECT and FETCH command for
the inbox is as follows:
C: A003 SELECT "INBOX"
S: * 60 EXISTS
S: ... more untagged responses with information about the folder
S: A003 OK SELECT completed
C: A004 FETCH 1:* (FLAGS UID)
S: * 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Answered) UID 120)
S: * 2 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 121)
S: ... flags for messages with message sequence numbers 3-59
S: * 60 FETCH (FLAGS () UID 250)
S: A004 OK FETCH completed
The client must go through the full list of email messages in each
folder. It must add an email in this list if it is not already on
the client. It must modify any email in this list on the client
device to reflect any changes to the mutable flags of that message
using IMAP STORE command. Also, it should remove any emails on the
client device not in this list. After performing these operations,
the client is in sync with the server.
P-IMAP recommends that P-IMAP disconnected clients follow the
recommendations of [IMAP-DISC] and utilize the IMAP extensions that
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 7]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
are available as UIDPLUS [UIDPLUS], CONDSTORE [CONDSTORE}, LITERAL+
[LITERAL+], and MULTIAPPEND [RFC3502].
1.2.2. Event-based Synchronization
Another technique is event-based synchronization. Event-based
synchronization is used to keep the client device in sync with the
server by communicating from the server to the client that a change
has taken place on the server and what the change is and conversely
from the client to the server that a change has taken place on the
client and what the change is. This method requires that the client
has been fully synchronized with the server at some earlier point.
In the IMAPv4Rev1 protocol, the client must perform a state-
comparison-based sync when it selects a folder, but then it can use
event-based synchronization to keep itself in sync after that.
Although event-based synchronization cannot totally replace state-
comparison-based synchronization, it is a faster alternative for the
client to maintain synchrony when the server is capable of change
tracking for a client. Of course the client maintains tracks of its
changes too.
In event-based synchronization, the server keeps track of what
changes (called events) have occurred to the email account that are
not yet reflected on the client device. When the client finishes
processing all events since the last time it was in sync with the
server, it is again in sync with the server. Event-based
synchronization is particularly effective when the server can push
events to the client for immediate processing. In this case, there
are likely to be only a small number of events the client needs to
process at one time.
Also, when a P-IMAP client drops a connection or accidentally
disconnects, the P-IMAP server can retain the associated session (to
facilitate reconnection, authentication and to guarantee valid UIDs
etc
) and cache all events during the time the client is
disconnected. When the client reconnects and is able to obtain the
same session, it does not need to perform a state-comparison-based
synchronization all over again, but rather, the server sends the list
of pending events to the client. In order to avoid losing changes
performed on the client during the time the client is disconnected,
the client should apply its changes first.
1.2.3. Reconnecting in a same session
The IMAP protocol is predicated upon the assumption that the client
establishes a session that is maintained during the client server
interaction. The IMAP protocol depends on the underlying transport
protocol to provide the session. Attempts have been made to lower
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 8]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
cost of establishing sessions via schemes like the quick reconnect
technique being proposed for IMAP [CONNECT].
If the underlying transport is inherently unstable, such as over a
wireless network, the transport protocol may drop the session
frequently. Also if P-IMAP were to be implemented over session-less
protocol such as SMS, or over an asynchronous messaging system (e.g.
MOM -- Message Oriented Middleware), then the session may not even be
maintained by the underlying transport protocol. For this reason a
future extension may allow P-IMAP commands to optionally carry a
session ID in them so that the P-IMAP server can relate any command
to the right session if it exists, or respond with the LOGIN response
if the session does not exist. If the session exists, the P-IMAP
client can behave as if it never lost the session to the server. This
technique is immune to the characteristics of the underlying
transport protocol from the perspective of session reliability.
It is possible to include a session id in P-IMAP commands is to
encode them as a prefix of the tags. For a definition of tagged and
untagged exchanges, see later on. In this scheme, when the client
logs in into the P-IMAP server with the device ID (defined later)
appended to the user name, it will establish a session and associate
a unique id (SID) with the session. For security reasons, the SID
should be a random number generated over a very large range. The SID
is sent back to the P-IMAP client (so that it be knowledgeable of it)
as part of the authentication. The P-IMAP client will then construct
P-IMAP command tags using the SID as a prefix. For any P-IMAP
command, the P-IMAP client may receive an untagged LOGIN response. In
this case, the P-IMAP client must assume that the session to the
server is severed and must take the appropriate action. So with such
a scheme, the P-IMAP client must always assume that the session is
still alive unless the P-IMAP server informs it otherwise. The client
therefore will behave like a connected client (i.e. logged in within
a valid P-IMAP session) until such time as the server returns a LOGIN
response. When a session is severed, the client may initiate the
disconnected mode synchronization approach (i.e. start a state-
comparison-based synchronization), unless if this can be avoided as
discussed below.
Loss of session to the server does not necessarily mean the P-IMAP
client has to resort to the state comparison based synchronization.
It depends on the P-IMAP client and server capabilities. For example,
if the server supports UID based operations and is able to return
EXPUNGE untagged responses with UIDs instead of message sequence
numbers, the P-IMAP client may do event based synchronization as long
as the UIDs are still valid for the folder.
1.2.3. Clarification note on the term P-IMAP Session
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 9]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
P-IMAP session in this document differs from the definition of
session (conventional IMAP session) in [RFC3501]. In RFC3501, the
term session refers to time spent in a folder via SELECT/EXAMINE and
the sequence of commands executed for that duration. SELECT or
EXAMINE on another folder ends the session
The concept of P-IMAP session defined in this document pertains to
all of the user associated state since LOGIN/AUTHENTICATE similar to
[CONNECT]. This is significant, because event based synchronization
adds significant amount of state to the session. The server is
presumed to temporarily maintain for a limited duration, a list of
changes made to every folder the user is subscribed to, which the
client may receive when it SELECTs a folder. This is in addition to
the normal IMAP state, such as remembering what the current selected
mailbox is.
1.3.
The Server-Side Filtering in P-IMAP
The P-IMAP protocol is meant to support mobile client devices with
memory and connectivity constraints. Due to these constraints, an
end user may want to specify filters to limit the number of
notifications sent. These filters separate the users messages into
different sets that the server should handle differently. All end
users have a complete repository, which is the place where a users
messages are stored on the server. The end user may want to receive
a subset of these messages on their client device. The messages on
the device are split further into two categories, lower priority
messages that the user chooses to wait for until he can poll (i.e.
pull from) the server and higher priority messages that the user
would like to be notified of (ie pushed from the server) as soon as
possible by the server. All three repositories have the same set of
folders.
+----------------+ +---------------+ +------------+
| COMPLETE | | MOBILE | | MOBILE |
| | | POLL | | PUSH |
| REPOSITORY | View | REPOSITORY |Notification| REPOSITORY |
| all the emails |Filters | emails to be | Filters | important |
|in an end user's|========|on the mobile |============| emails of |
| email account | |client(VFOLDER)| | end user |
+----------------+ +---------------+ +------------+
Figure 3: Filters and Repositories
Formally, a repository consists of a set of folders, and each folder
has both a name and a set of messages associated with it. The
complete repository consists of all folders of an end user and all
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 10]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
the associated messages for each of those folders. Messages in the
complete repository that pass the view filter make up the poll
repository. In addition, there is a second layer of filtering,
called notification filter, and there is exactly one notification
filter per folder per device. The mobile push repository is the
set of all the messages in the complete repository that pass both the
view and the notification filters. Note these repositories are only
logical components.
From this point forth, it can be assumed that an event in this
document refers to only and all changes to messages in the mobile
repositories. When the client connects to the server and polls for
messages, it can determine what changes have occurred to messages
that passed the view filters. Whenever an event occurs to a message
that passes the view and notification filters, that message becomes a
candidate to be pushed.
Whenever a change occurs to the complete repository, it is first
determined whether this change concerns a message or a folder. If it
concerns a folder, it is a folder event and all folder events are
push events. If the change concerns a message that passes the view
filters, it is a message event. Otherwise, this change does not
concern the mobile repository and thus is not considered an event for
the purposes of P-IMAP. Next, if a message event concerns a message
that passed the notification filter and that event passes the event
filter, it is a pushed message event. Otherwise, if the message
event concerns a message that does not pass the notification filters,
it is a polled message event.
Note UIDs are assumed the same in these repositories for the same
message.
1.4.
Extra Functionality in P-IMAP
The P-IMAP server supports a rich set of extra functionality over the
IMAP server to support extra features for a mobile client, and these
features are presented:
[1] Compression - The P-IMAP protocol allows for compression of
literal IMAP data in a command or response.
[2] Sending emails - The P-IMAP server can be used to send email,
thus eliminating the need for the P-IMAP client to connect to a
separate SMTP server. This is not intended to replace SMTP but
rather to provide a mechanism that can be easily and rapidly
implemented by servers and that is especially well adapted to
gateways / proxies used to enable e-mail and submission servers.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 11]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
[3] Support for unstable mobile connections - After a client drops
a connection, the P-IMAP server can temporarily maintain the
session for the mobile client. During this time, the server caches
any events concerning the mobile repository while the client is
disconnected, which it can then send to the client upon
reconnection.
[4] Longer periods of inactivity tolerated - A P-IMAP server can
wait for certain period of time before logging out an inactive
mobile client and ending its session.
[5] Attachments forward/reply behavior - When forwarding/replying
to a message from the P-IMAP client, the end user may edit portions
of the original message and re-compose the edited body parts
(addressees, body, attachments) using CATENATE [CATENATE] and
IMAPURLs [RFC2192], [IMAPURLbis].
[6] Attachments conversion - The P-IMAP server can convert
attachments to other formats to be viewed on a mobile device. The
client can explicitly request a particular conversion. The server
complies on a best effort basis. When not possible, the server
determines based on its own strategy (e.g. based on knowledge of
the client as discussed hereafter) how to convert, unless the
client disables server fallback. If the server knows the
characteristics of the device or can determine them (out of scope
of P-IMAP), the attachments can also be optimized for the
capabilities of the devices (e.g. form factor of pictures). See
discussion in Appendix D. This is a recommended server behavior.
[7] PIM (personal information management) - The protocol can also
provide support for updating personal information on a client
device, even when these changes are initiated from another client
(i.e. a personal assistant connects to an end user's account from a
desktop and changes contact information.) Vendors may rely on P-
IMAP to exchange calendar events and address book changes as
attachments or messages. With the name reserved by [VFOLDER], it
should be clear that folders starting with Calendar* and Contacts*
can be used for this purpose. PIM (calendar and address book) MAY
of course be separate services from email.
2.
Relation with the Lemonade Profile and other E-mail specifications
P-IMAP is a recommendation for interoperable intermediate
implementations awaiting [LEMONADEPROFILEBIS] or the realization of
the OMA MEM enabler using it.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 12]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
As the LEMONADE profile [LEMONADEPROFILE, LEMONADEPROFILEBIS] work
progresses, the P-IMAP specifications are expected to further
converge towards the profile.
Note that P-IMAP defines multiple bindings. When it relies on TCP
bindings for P-IMAP requests and responses, P-IMAP can be viewed as a
direct extension of IMAPv4 Rev1 (or IMAP4 profile for mobile) and
therefore a good candidate for the Lemonade mobile optimization. With
other bindings, it becomes a way to implement optimized mobile and
push e-mail using IMAP semantics appropriately extended and
transported on other bindings.
3.
The P-IMAP Design
P-IMAP extends IMAP and has the same basic model, where the client
connects to the server to open a session to access its email account.
A P-IMAP client may fetch the contents of the email account or make
changes to it just as in IMAP. P-IMAP does, however, have many
enhancements to IMAP, and this section introduces the core design
changes. There are many requirements given in this section, as well
as concepts that are essential to understanding the protocol.
3.1.
Implementing Filters
A P-IMAP server should support multiple mobile devices for each email
user, and should allow each device to have one unique event filter
and a set of view filters and notification filters. A mobile client
connects to the P-IMAP server by supplying its login information. P-
IMAP extends the IMAP login information by permitting the username to
be appended with a device ID. The device ID is a unique identifier,
with respect to the server, for the client device issued by the
server. If no device ID is given during authentication, then a
regular IMAP session is initiated instead of a P-IMAP session. The
credentials sent during the LOGIN/AUTHENTICATE exchange are used to
identify and authenticate the user, while the device ID is used to
determine the users profile (a set of filters) for the device as
well as determining whether a valid session already exists for the
user for the device. Associated with the user and device ID is one
view or more view filters and exactly one notification filter for
each view. These filters are saved and thus persist across P-IMAP
sessions. Filters can be modified when a P-IMAP session is open,
however modifications may impose a cost on the client (full state
sync).
P-IMAP does not constrain how notification filters are defined. They
may be based on SIEVE [RFC3028] and following work. Creation of view
filters are achieved via the P-IMAP extension VFOLDER.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 13]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
3.1.1. The View Filter
View filters are used to filter out email messages, which match
certain criteria. If an email passes through the view filter, it is
stored in the mobile repository. View filters are implemented using
the VFOLDER CREATE extension which is used to create IMAP folders
which are views of other folders. A P-IMAP server MAY choose to
impose the restriction that vfolders are per-device and thus two
vfolders with the same name can exist for the same P-IMAP user. The
syntax for defining a vfolder follows the syntax for creating an IMAP
folder combined with an IMAP search. The vfolder search syntax
includes any combination of most of the search criteria as defined
for the SEARCH command of IMAP, in Section 6.4.4 and 7.2.5 of RFC
3501. Creating a filter of messages received starting a certain
number of days before the current day can be achieved with the new
SEARCH WITHIN [WITHIN] extension. The ALL search criteria, when
used alone, means that every email event satisfies the criteria.
A view filter (vfolder) cannot be modified, it can only be deleted
and recreated. Whenever this happens the client associated to the
user must to perform a state-comparison-based sync to keep in sync
with the mobile repository.
3.1.2. The Notification Filter
Notification filters are used to form a subset of higher priority or
special messages by logically copying messages, from the mobile
repository into the mobile push repository, that match certain
criteria. The syntax for defining a notification filter is the same
as defining a view filter.
Because the view filter defaults to ALL and the notification filter
to NONE, the mobile poll repository will mirror the complete
repository, but none of the messages are added to the mobile push
repository. This implies that the default behavior is equal to the
IMAPv4 Rev1 model.
The client does not need to do anything after it resets a
notification filter or event filter (i.e. sets all NONE and ALL to
default values). The server should then only send out notifications
that correspond to the most up-to-date filters.
3.1.3. The Event Filter
The event filter is used to filter out message events concerning
messages in the push repository. The syntax for defining an event
filter is ALL, NONE, or NEW. An event filter applies for all folders
in a push repository.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 14]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
ALL -- All message events concerning messages of the push
repository will be sent to the client, such as if the message becomes
seen or deleted.
NONE -- No events should be pushed to the client.
NEW -- Only events that concern new messages arriving to the push
repository should be pushed to the client.
3.2.
Connectivity Models
There are three connectivity models for P-IMAP, depending on the
capabilities of the P-IMAP server, the client, and the connection
available between them. These models include in-response, in-band,
and out-of-band. It is explicitly stated in what situations these
three connectivity models can be used.
3.2.1. In-Response Connectivity
The in-response binding scenario is the most basic one and implements
the poll model. In this case the client initiates the commands to the
P-IMAP server and the server responds to client commands with events.
In this case there is no need for a persistent connection between the
client and the server. The client opens a connection only when it
needs to send commands to the P-IMAP server, and that is the only
time it is notified of new events.
+--------+ +++ HTTP, etc. +--------+
| | Command +++ | |
| Client |--------------------+++--------------->| P-IMAP |
| Device | +++ | Server |
| | Response + Event +++ | |
| |<-------------------+++----------------| |
+--------+ +++ +--------+
Figure 4: In-Response connection
Cases of in-response connection:
[1] HTTP/HTTPS binding
- Server Requires: HTTP/HTTPS listener for P-IMAP
- Client Requires: HTTP/HTTPS client with P-IMAP processing
[2] TCP Binding
- Server Requires: P-IMAP
- Client Requires: P-IMAP + no IDLE
3.2.2. In-band Connectivity
The in-band binding scenario corresponds to a reliable push model.
In this case the server pushes events to the client whenever they
occur. To do so, it must have a reliable means of communication with
the client, and the client should be ready to accept such
notifications. In this case, there needs to be a persistent
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 15]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
connection between the client and the server so that the server can
push an event at any time. The client may optionally issue a request
to retrieve more information concerning an event.
+--------+ OOO TCP, Persistent +--------+
| | Push Event OOO HTTP, etc. | |
| Client |<------------------OOO-----------------| P-IMAP |
| Device | OOO | Server |
| | Optional Request OOO | |
| |...................OOO................>| |
+--------+ OOO +--------+
Figure 5: In-band Connection
Cases of in-band connection:
[1] TCP Binding, Always connected, IDLE
- Server Requires: P-IMAP + IDLE
- Client Requires: P-IMAP + IDLE, constant TCP connection
[2] Any other persistent two-way connection
- Server Requires: P-IMAP + IDLE on persistent connection (e.g.
HTTP/HTTPS)
- Client Requires: P-IMAP + IDLE on persistent connection (e.g.
HTTP/HTTPS), constant connection
Persistent HTTP/HTTPS may sometimes be difficult to achieve with
todays intermediaries if the HTTP server does not support HTTP 1.1
correctly or has a very short timeout period for persistent
connections.
Both connectivity models above (In-response and in-band) involve a
maintained data connection with notification exchanged within the P-
IMAP band (i.e. P-IMAP exchanges).
3.2.3. Out-of-band Connectivity
This case covers notification outside the P-IMAP band:
- In a different connection
- Within the same data connection but outside the P-IMAP band
The out-of-band binding scenario corresponds to a push model that may
be unreliable. In this case the server pushes events to the client
whenever they occur, to the best of its ability. To do so, it should
be able to send messages to the client without necessarily the need
for a persistent connection. However, the out-of-band channel can
possibly lose and reorder messages. In addition, there are no timing
guarantees.
Examples of out-band channels include SMS (and GSMSMS),WAP Push (and
WAPWDP), SIP notification and UDP. As in the in-band scenario, the
client may optionally open a P-IMAP session over an in-band or in-
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 16]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
response connection and send a command as a result of receiving an
event.
+--------+ Push Event XXX SMS/SIP/MMS/UDP +--------+
| |<--------------XXX---------------------| |
| Client | XXX /WAP Push/... | P-IMAP |
| Device | Optional In-band or | Server |
| | Request +O+ In-response | |
| |---------------O+O-------------------->| |
+--------+ +O+ +--------+
Figure 6: Out-of-band Connection
Cases of out-of-band connectivity:
[1] A notification service from the server to the client
- Server Requires: A notification generator (defined by
notification channel)..
- Client Requires: A notification processor (defined by
notification channel)..
In-band or In-response exchanges are on:
- HTTP or HTTPS
- TCP
- Other transport
3.3.
Recommended Connectivity Models
To address the problems discussed in [MEMAIL], it is a good idea to
always support the out-of-band connectivity model with HTTP/HTTPS
binding.
Support of HTTP/HTTPS binding is recommended as a minimum option.
Recommended out-of-band channels include SMS, UDP (if supported by
target networks and deployment model) and SIP event notification all
using the payload format discussed in appendix B.
3.4.
Keeping the Client In Sync with the Mobile Repository
Whenever a client device opens a new P-IMAP session with a P-IMAP
server and the P-IMAP server has to open a new session with the IMAP
server for this client, the client must perform a state-comparison-
based sync with the mobile repository. Since the client has no way
of directly detecting only changes to the repository since the last
login, it needs to retrieve information about every message in the
mobile repository and calculate the changes itself. After that
point, the client can use event-based synchronization to keep the
device in sync.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 17]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
The P-IMAP server tracks changes to all folders and returns them to
the client for the duration of a session. Until the session is
expired, the server must log all events that occur while a client is
disconnected. This way, if the client temporarily loses a
connection, it does not have to worry about missing any events and
needing to perform another state-comparison-based sync. A client
does have the option though to prematurely end a session by issuing a
LOGOUT command. Additionally, P-IMAP clients can remain inactive
for a certain period of time without being logged off the server and
without the session expiring.
Events are only returned to the client for the currently selected
folder, although they are still tracked for folders that arent
currently selected. To support event-based synchronization for
multiple folders, the client will have to issue a SELECT for each
folder of interest to the user and receive the queued up events for
that folder.
In other words, P-IMAP supports multi-folder semantics, including
separate notification and event filters for each folder, as well as
tracking changes to each folder, with the caveat that during event
retrieval from the P-IMAP server within a session, the client must
SELECT each folder separately to receive the changes for that folder.
4.
Events
This section contains the syntax that the server uses to send events
to the client.
4.1.
Message Events Sent During In-band and In-response Mode
The client can receive the following untagged responses from the
server:
[1] The client receives an EXISTS/RECENT event from the server
indicating a new message.
S: * 501 EXISTS
S: * 1 RECENT
Next, the client retrieves this new message using a FETCH command.
C: A02 FETCH 501 (ALL BODY[])
S: * 501 FETCH ...
S: A02 OK FETCH completed
[2] The client receives an EXPUNGE event from the server from a
message has been permanently removed from a folder.
S: * 25 EXPUNGE
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 18]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
The client deletes this message from the client device, as it has
been removed permanently from the folder. The client does not need
to send any command back to the server.
[3] The client receives an untagged FETCH event from the server,
which can contain just FLAG information if the event is regarding an
old message or FLAG plus possibly other information if the event is
regarding a new message. This event is received if a message's flags
are changed, or for a new message if the user's preferences are set
to do so.
S: * 101 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted))
The client saves the information contained in this response
accurately in the client device.
5.
Interactions between the P-IMAP Client and P-IMAP Server
A P-IMAP server must support all IMAPv4Rev1 commands from client
devices following the syntax defined in [RFC3501]. Thus, a P-IMAP
client may issue any existing IMAP commands to the P-IMAP server, and
both the server and client must behave as specified in RFC3501 except
for the changes specified in Section 5.1. In addition, P-IMAP
defines extension commands for IMAPv4 Rev1 using the
Experimental/Expansion mechanism defined in [RFC3501, Sec 6.5] and,
as per RFC definition, P-IMAP command names must start with X. P-IMAP
commands are tagged and asynchronous following the same rules as in
IMAPv4 Rev1.
Client commands, as well as the server responses to them, are
included in this section. The P-IMAP protocol also defines events to
be sent by the server to the client. These events notify the client
when there are changes to messages that match an end user's view
filters and notification filters, as well as any changes to a
client's email folders. The syntax defined in this section is an
abstract syntax, and payloads may vary according to the communication
mechanism used. The normative appendix of this document describes
some specific payloads.
The format for presenting commands is defined as follows (SEE
RFC3501]:
<COMMAND NAME>
<Command Description - contains an explanation of the command>
Formal Syntax: <command syntax described in ABNF [RFC2234]>
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 19]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
Valid States: <states of the P-IMAP session in which this command
can be used>
[Extension to: <states what IMAP command this command should be
used in place of>]
Responses: <server responses for this command>
Result: <possible result that comes after the responses. This
usually indicates the status of the execution of a particular
command. Possible values are:
- OK if the execution was successful
- BAD for unknown commands, or when arguments syntax is
incorrect
- NO when argument semantics are incorrect, or when command
processing fails
- BYE when internal system or network error happens and
processing cannot continue>
Example: <Description of what this example is meant to illustrate>
C: <client issued commands>
S: <server returned results>
This section describes commands where the client initiates contact
with the server, like all the commands in the IMAPv4 Rev1 protocol.
These commands include extensions to the IMAP protocol that have been
created in order to better support mobile devices, and these
extensions are all prefixed with X. They are used to perform actions
on messages: retrieve, delete, search, etc., as well as set up the
filters and notification methods of a mobile client. These commands
are sent over a reliable connection as required for IMAP, see
[RFC3501, Sec. 2.1] for more details. Client devices can send
several commands at one time and, thus, these commands must be
tagged. The server can send tagged and untagged responses to the
client. Untagged responses contain information requested by a
command. Tagged responses give the status of the command execution
and its tag identifies the command it corresponds to.
To connect to a P-IMAP server, the client must first follow the
procedure for establishing an IMAP session. The client starts out in
NOT AUTHENTICATED state and issues a LOGIN/AUTHENTICATE command with
a valid P-IMAP device ID appended to the username. Once this is
accepted, the P-IMAP session is started and the client enters the
AUTHENTICATED state where it can use all the P-IMAP extension
commands, as opposed to a regular IMAP session, which will return
errors to all P-IMAP defined extensions other than XZIP, XDELIVER,
and XPROVISION. To establish a regular IMAP session, the client may
also login in the usual fashion with their username and password.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 20]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
The server responds to XPROVISION commands by returning any service
specific parameters of the server, such as which out-of-band channels
are supported. The XZIP command can be used to fetch body parts and
zip returned literal data. XDELIVER allows the client to send an
email message through this server, instead of having to connect with
an SMTP server.
Once entered into the P-IMAP session, the client can issue XCONVERT,
XSETPIMAPPREF, XGETPIMAPPREFS, and XVFOLDER related commands as
needed. XCONVERT is used for body parts.
5.1.
Revisions to IMAPv4 Rev1 Behavior
The section describes all the differences between how an IMAPv4 Rev1
server vs. a P-IMAP server responds to all IMAPv4Rev1 commands for
implementing the custom mobile features. A compliant P-IMAP server
must implement all the commands in IMAPv4 Rev1, with these revisions.
The IMAPv4Rev1 syntax on commands and responses are found in sections
6 and 7 in [RFC3501]. The rest of this section defines any
additional modifications to the IMAP commands that a P-IMAP server
must implement to be compliant.
5.1.1. Mobile Repository
In a P-IMAP session, the client can access messages in the mobile
repository (e.g a VFOLDER defined on INBOX) or it may choose to
access messages in the complete repository.
5.1.2. The CAPABILITY Command
The CAPABILITY command is defined in RFC3501, section 6.1.1. The
client sends a CAPABILITY command so it can query the server to find
out what commands it supports. In RFC3501, the IMAP server is
allowed to specify additional capabilities not included in that
specification. A P-IMAP server conforms to that requirement, and
must list what P-IMAP version it supports.
XPIMAPv1r2 means that the server supports PIMAP version 1.2, which
includes the commands, XPROVISION, XSETPIMAPPREF, XGETPIMAPPREF,
XDELIVER, XZIP, XCONVERT, XVFOLDER, XENCRYPTED and BINARY. It also
implies support for LITERAL+ [LITERAL+].
A server can also enumerate individually the P-IMAP commands and
additional commands that it supports.
capability_cmd = tag SP "CAPABILITY"
Valid States: NOT AUTHENTICATED, AUTHENTICATED, SELECTED, or LOGOUT
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 21]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
Responses: REQUIRED untagged response: CAPABILITY
Result: OK - capability completed
BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
Example: A P-IMAP server that implements P-IMAP Version 1rev2.
C: a001 CAPABILITY
S: * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 AUTH=LOGIN IDLE xPIMAPv1r2
S: a001 OK CAPABILITY completed
A P-IMAP server can declare the draft revision that it complies to
via: xPIMAPcomplyrev12 for revision 12 etc...
5.1.3. P-IMAP Session/Login
An email user's username for a P-IMAP session is its regular username
+ "#" + its P-IMAP device ID + the email domain. P-IMAP device IDs
might be "P" + the device ID issued by the P-IMAP server (e.g. it may
be the client's digit telephone number. Note the length of the phone
number should not be limited to a specific value as it may change
from country to country). To initiate a P-IMAP session, the client
uses a LOGIN/AUTHENTICATE command with this new username.
The P-IMAP server will automatically try to resume a previous session
for this client. It can check the device ID to see if the session
exists (which will work for connection-based transport such as TCP),
or it can rely on the new mechanisms described in section 1.2.3
otherwise the server can inform the client of the state of the server
by sending an untagged SESSION response. If that state is SELECTED,
the server also tells the client what the selected folder is by
sending an untagged FOLDER response. Next, the server sends the
client any pending events that have occurred in this folder while the
client has been disconnected. Thus, the client can just service
these pending events and need not perform a full sync. If these
events could not be cached for some reason or the server senses the
client may have not received some events, the RESYNC Response is
returned, and the client should perform a state-comparison based
sync. A SESSIONID Response is returned whenever a PIMAP session is
initiated/resumed.
untagged SESSION Response = "*" SP "SESSION" SP ("AUTHENTICATED" /
"SELECTED")untagged SESSIONID Response = ""*" SP "SESSION" SP
untagged FOLDER Response = "*" SP "FOLDER" SP folder
untagged RESYNC Response = "*" SP "RESYNC"
When there is no active P-IMAP session - either because this is the
very first time client logins, or because the client explicitly sent
a LOGOUT command to close a previous session - then the server
returns a new session ID response and the tagged response to the
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 22]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
LOGIN command, and the client needs to perform state-comparison-sync
to synchronize its contents.
Example: First login, the client needs to perform a state-
comparison-sync to get in sync.
C: A01 LOGIN joe#P6505551234 password
S: * SESSIONID 123456
S: A01 OK LOGIN completed
Example: A successful P-IMAP login resuming an old session
C: A02 LOGIN joe#P6505551234@foo.com password
S: * SESSION AUTHENTICATED
S: * SESSIONID 123456
S: A02 OK LOGIN completed
Example: A successful P-IMAP login resuming an old session in
SELECTED state with the INBOX selected.
C: A02 LOGIN joe#P6505551234 password
S: * SESSION SELECTED
S: * FOLDER INBOX
S: * 14 EXISTS
S: * 49 FETCH (....
S: * SESSIONID 123456
S: A02 OK LOGIN completed
Example: A successful P-IMAP login resuming an old session in
SELECTED state with the INBOX selected, but where the server could
not cache all the events since the last disconnect.
C: A02 LOGIN joe#P6505551234 password
S: * SESSION SELECTED
S: * FOLDER INBOX
S: * RESYNC
S: * SESSIONID 123456
S: A02 OK LOGIN completed
5.1.4. IDLE
The server must implement the IDLE command from RFC 2177. When the
client issues this command, the server can push changes to a folder
to the client. The server may replace the EXISTS/RECENT message with
an untagged FETCH command as specified in Section 5.3.2. The client
should send this command while in-session to enter in-band mode,
where the server will actively push notifications to the client.
5.1.5. XENCRYPTED
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 23]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
For certain proxy-based implementation of P-IMAP (see Security
Considerations and Appendix C), it may be necessary to object level
encryption for FETCH responses of email content. In that case, the
server uses a new encrypted literal syntax for any FETCH data that
its security policy wants unreadable by a proxy. The server should
return XENCRYPTED in response to the CAPABILITY command if it
implements this security mechanism and must announce the encryption
methods specified (see the example following).
Server's response to the CAPABILITY command announcing XENCRYPTED
methods.
C: A02 CAPABILITY
S: * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 XENCRYTPED=3DES,RC40,AES
S: A02 CAPABILITY completed
The new encrypted literal extends the IMAP BINARY literal8 syntax,
and has the following syntax:
literalx = ~{X number [+] } CRLF *BINCHAR /
{X number [+] } CRLF base64
string =/ literalx
BINCHAR = <0x00 0xFF>
; encrypted data payload
; subject to RFC2630 Section 6.3 padding before encrypting
The key used to encrypt data using algorithms such as 3DES or AES,
must be computed or provisioned into the device. If the client uses
SASL [RFC2222] to authenticate, then a session key should be computed
according to Section 2.4 of [RFC2831]. Otherwise, a key must be
provisioned via a mechanism which is out-of-band with respect to the
proxy server, either through an alternate TCP or HTTP mechanism, such
as a TLS or HTTPS connection, a secure SMS, or manually by user entry
of a shared secret.
The users password or shared secret with the server may also be used
to derive this key.
Keys and key updates can be provided via XPROVISION only in the case
that the connection is secured against the proxy, such as using SSL
through the proxy to provision keys, or via an out-of-band (with
respect to the proxy) method such as XPROVISION executed over an
HTTPS binding. Otherwise, a session key may be derived in the same
way that SASL derives session keys when confidentiality is requested.
See also the analysis presented in Appendix C.
5.2.
Registering with the server
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 24]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
When the client registers itself with the server, it sends a HELLO
message with the device ID in plain text and a payload, which is the
device ID, encrypted using the encryption key associated with the
server, to the Notification Delivery Service. The format of this
message is:
HELLO sp deviceID sp encrypted-deviceID and network-characteristics
Network-characteristics may be the device IP address or any other
information the device wants to send. The server is expected to use
what it understands and disregard the rest.
The server will look up the encryption key associated with the
device. If the encryption key does not exists, INVALID ENCRYPTION
KEY response is sent to the Notification Processor in plain text. If
the encryption key exists the Notification Delivery Service will use
it to decrypt the payload using 64-bit Advanced Encryption Standard
or 64-bit Triple-DES algorithms and compare it to the device ID. If
they match, it will retrieve information that it has on the device.
It will then send the OK response to the caller (client). When UDP
notifications are used it will send with the encrypted server IP
Address and port number of the Notification Delivery Service as
described in XPROVISION.
Whenever the server must send a notification to the client, the
server generates a unique sequence number and content for the
notification, encrypts it using the encryption key, and sends it to
the device. The mechanism to send it may be a UDP/IP session if one
is available to the device or any other out-of-band message
otherwise.
When XENCRYPTED is used, all in-band messages from the server are
similarly encrypted.
The client can use the same key to encrypt its messages to the
server.
Note that if proxies are not an issue (see Appendix C and section on
Security considerations), STARTTLS may be used by the client. In such
cases, XENCRYPTED does not present any advantages and should not be
used.
5.3.
P-IMAP Extension Commands and Responses
The following subsections define P-IMAP extension commands and as per
RFC 3501, their names start with X.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 25]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
5.3.1. XPROVISION
The XPROVISION command is used to allow a device to obtain service
specific parameters of the server. This includes what filters have
been defined. Also, it will supply a list of all P-IMAP preferences
and the values they can be set to. In addition, UDP information
may be given when UDP notification is supported, such as the host
name and port. A P-IMAP server can return other parameters as long
as its syntax is agreed upon with the P-IMAP client.
xprovision_cmd = tag SP "XPROVISION" SP device-id [notif-id]
Valid States: AUTHENTICATED or SELECTED
Responses: REQUIRED untagged responses XPROVISION
Result: OK - provision completed
NO - can't provision this device
BAD - command unknown, invalid argument
untagged XPROVISION XPIMAPPREF response = "*" SP "XPROVISION" SP
"XPIMAPPREF" SP prev-name SP "(" pref_val_list ")"
untagged XPROVISION UDP_HOST response = "*" SP "XPROVISION" SP
"PIMAP_UDP_HOST" SP "(" udp_hostname ")"
untagged XPROVISION UDP_PORT response = "*" SP "XPROVISION" SP
"PIMAP_UDP_PORT" SP "(" udp_portnum ")"
untagged XPROVISION ENC_KEY response = "*" SP "XPROVISION" SP
"PIMAP_ENC_KEY " SP "(" encryptionkey ")"
If LPROVISION is returning keys, the server should only do so in the
following circumstances:
a) TLS/SSL is being used
b) SASL [RFC2222] confidentiality protection has been negotiated and
enabled.
Example: The client issues an XPROVISION command. The server
returns the values of various PIMAPPREF's
and the values they can be set to. The server responds by
returning the encryption key, modes, and channels supported
by P-IMAP. Note the syntax for returning parameters.
C: A002 XPROVISION
S: * XPROVISION XPIMAPPREF PIMAP_OUTBAND_CHANNEL (SMS NONE)
S: * XPROVISION XPIMAPPREF PIMAP_INBAND_NEW_FORMAT (NONE)
S: * XPROVISION XPIMAPPREF PIMAP_INBAND_PUSH (ON OFF)
S: * XPROVISION XPIMAPPREF PIMAP_EVENT_FILTER (NEW)
S: * XPROVISION XPIMAPPREF PIMAP_OUTBAND_FORMAT (EMN EXTENDED)
S: * XPROVISION PIMAP_NOTIFICATION ADDRESS (address)
S: * XPROVISION PIMAP_NOTIFICATION PORT (portnum)
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 26]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
S: * XPROVISION PIMAP_ENC_KEY (enc_key)
S: A002 OK XPROVISION completed
The following two instructions should be deprecated but are currently
maintained for backward compatibility to earlier versions of P-IMAP:
S: * XPROVISION PIMAP_UDP_HOST (udp_hostname)
S: * XPROVISION PIMAP_UDP_PORT (udp_portnum)
UDP HOST and UDP PORT define where the client initiates a UDP session
for UDP notification.
Event payloads are discussed in Appendix B.
5.3.2. XSETPIMAPPREF & XGETPIMAPPREFS
The XSETPIMAPPREF command allows a user to define certain
configuration parameters, while the XGETPIMAPPREFS command allows a
user to retrieve the configuration values. Any server that
implements these commands must respond with XPIMAPPREF as one of the
capabilities in response to a CAPABILITY command. It must also
announce the values these parameters can be set to in the XPROVISION
command as specified as follows. These parameters affect how out-of-
band notifications are sent to the client, as well as the format for
sending new event notifications. If the server supports XPIMAPPREF
they are required to support all of the following preferences.
The preferences that can set with this command are as follows and
their names start with PIMAP to identify them as P-IMAP parameters.
(They may not apply in some configuration (e.g. no PIMAP OUTBAND
ADDRESS when using UDP notifications)):
[1] PIMAP_OUTBAND_ADDRESS - the number or email address to send
out-of-band notification messages to the client. This must be a
valid address according to the out-of-band channel requirements.
This will not be returned in the XPROVISION command. This is not
applicable to out-of-band UDP notifications.
[2] PIMAP_OUTBAND_CHANNEL - the channel to send out-of-band
notifications, either SMS, GSMSMS, WAP_PUSH, WAPWDP, MMS, SIP, UDP
or NONE. When NONE, the P-IMAP server does not send the client any
out-of-band notifications. The list of values may be extended with
new values when different out-of-band channels are available. The
valid values for this preference that the server supports will be
given in response to the XPROVISION command.
[3] PIMAP_IN-BAND_NEW_FORMAT - the FETCH parameters to
automatically send to the client when there is a new message and
there is a valid P-IMAP session, or NONE. If NONE, the server
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 27]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
sends the client a traditional EXISTS message when a new message
arrives in the folder. Otherwise, in place of the EXISTS message,
the server sends an untagged FETCH response with the given
information. The valid values for this preference that the server
supports will be given in response to the XPROVISION command.
[4] PIMAP_INBAND_PUSH - whether or not the server should
automatically IDLE the server when a folder is selected. The valid
values for this preference that the server supports will be given
in response to the XPROVISION command.
[5] PIMAP_OUTBAND_FORMAT - the format to send the out-of-band
notifications, i.e. EMN or EXTENDED.
[6] PIMAP_EVENT_FILTER - The event filter for this user. Possible
values are ALL or NONE or NEW, depending on the server's
capabilities.
xgetpimappref_cmd = tag SP "XGETPIMAPPREFS" SP "("
pimap_pref_list ")"
pimap_pref_list = pimap_pref [SP pimap_pref_list]
pimap_pref = (PIMAP_OUTBAND_ADDRESS /
PIMAP_OUTBAND_CHANNEL / PIMAP_INBAND_NEW_FORMAT /
PIMAP_INBAND_PUSH / PIMAP OUTBAND FORMAT /
PIMAP_EVENT_FILTER)
Valid States: AUTHENTICATED or SELECTED
Responses: REQUIRED untagged XGETPIMAPPREFS response with the value
of the requested parameter.
untagged XGETPIMAPPREFS response - "*" XGETPIMAPPREFS pref-pair
pref-pair = "(" pimap-pref SP pimap-pref-val [pref-pair] ")"
Result: OK - command completed
NO - command failure: can't alter preference
BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
Example: The client wishes to know the current out-of-band
notification method it has set up. It sends an XGETPIMAPPREFS
command.
C: A003 XGETPIMAPPREFS (PIMAP_OUTBAND_CHANNEL)
S: * XGETPIMAPPREFS (PIMAP_OUTBAND_CHANNEL SMS)
S: A003 0K XGETPIMAPPREFS completed
xsetpimappref_cmd = tag SP "XSETPIMAPPREF" SP
(("PIMAP_OUTBAND_ADDRESS" SP device_address) /
("PIMAP_OUTBAND_CHANNEL" SP
("SMS"/"GSMSMS"/"WAP_PUSH"/"WAPWDP"/"MMS"/"UDP"/"SIP"/ "NONE"))
/
("PIMAP_INBAND_NEW_FORMAT" SP fetch_criteria) /
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 28]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
("PIMAP_INBAND_PUSH" SP ("ON" / "OFF")) /
("PIMAP_OUTBAND_FORMAT SP ("EMN" / "EXTENDED"))
Valid States: AUTHENTICATED or SELECTED
Responses: No specific responses.
Result: OK - command completed
NO - command failure: can't get a preference
BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
Example: The client sets up its SMS device address and then selects
that it wants SMS messages sent to the device, and the format of the
SMS it wants.
C: A002 XSETPIMAPPREF PIMAP_OUTBAND_ADDRESS 13335559999
S: A002 OK XSETPIMAPPREF completed
C: A003 XSETPIMAPPREF PIMAP_OUTBAND_CHANNEL SMS
S: A003 OK XSETPIMAPPREF completed
C: A004 XSETPIMAPPREF PIMAP_OUTBAND_FORMAT EXTENDED
S: A004 OK XSETPIMAPPREF completed
Example: The client sets the in-band NEW format to be ALL, meaning it
wants the server to automatically send it all the headers for any new
message.
C: A002 XSETPIMAPPREF PIMAP_INBAND_NEW_FORMAT ALL
S: A002 OK XSETPIMAPPREF PIMAP_INBAND_NEW_FORMAT completed
From now on, whenever a new message arrives in a folder during a
valid P-IMAP session, the server will try to send an untagged FETCH
response of the new message with the specified information to the
client at the earliest opportunity. This untagged FETCH response
replaces the untagged EXISTS response that IMAP sends regarding a new
message.
S: * 60 FETCH ...<headers>
5.3.3. XZIP
XZIP should be seen as a way to address the issues of bandwidth
optimization.
The XZIP command is an extension of [RFC3516] IMAP BINARY, which
introduces three new commands XZIP, XZIP.PEEK, XZIP.SIZE that
parallel the syntax and semantics of BINARY, BINARY.PEEK, and
BINARY.SIZE in [RFC3516]. In general, XZIP inherits all of the
requirements and semantics of [RFC3516]s BINARY and BINARY.PEEK,
except that the content transfer encoding being requested is
understood to be the result of what would be returned from BINARY
decoding, followed by the application of the DEFLATE algorithm.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 29]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
Example: Zipping a body part fetch
C: A1 FETCH 123 XZIP.PEEK[1.2]
S: * XZIP[1.2]~{1234}
S:
.binary decoded and deflated data
.
S: A1 OK FETCH completed
As mentioned in RFC3516, XZIP.SIZE is a potentially expensive
operation, as in XLZIP, so clients should be aware that making
successive requests for the same part may be expensive.
5.3.4. XDELIVER
XDELIVER enables the efficient composition and transmission of email
using IMAP commands. This provides simple ways to provide reply and
forward without download complete messages utilizing a gateway to the
email and submit servers.
XDELIVER is not intended to replace SMTP [RFC2821]. Instead it is
envisaged as a simple way to implement gateways that support features
like reply and forward without downloading complete messages when the
email and submit servers may not support the commands described in
[LEMONADEPROFILE] to support such capabilities.
XDELIVER may allow some clients to reduce the amount of protocols
supported ports in use, parameters to set or provisioned, or network
protocols required.
All these are important features required in particular to support
mobile email use cases [MEMAIL],[OMA-ME-RD]:
- Forward and reply without download
- Ease of provisioning over the air
- Ease of manual provisioning
- Reduction of resources on the client
- Ease of implementation and deployment with existing email and
submit servers
The XDELIVER specification proposes a new command and also requires
the CATENATE [CATENATE], LITERAL+ [LITERAL+] and RFC2192BIS IMAPURL
extensions {IMAPURLbis].
5.3.5. IMAPURL extensions
IMAPURL is hereby modified according to RFC2192BIS [IMAPURLbis] to
support the partial specifier in IMAPURLs which allows byte ranges of
messages to be addressed. The format is
/;PARTIAL=<offset>[.<length>]
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 30]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
5.3.6. The XDELIVER command
After a message has been composed, it can be handed off to a submit
server. The mechanism by which it does this is by proxying a batched
set of SMTP commands to an SMTP server. XDELIVER is not an active
SMTP tunnel, but instead works similarly to Batch SMTP [RFC2442], by
allowing the client to compose a set of SMTP commands to be executed.
The major difference is that those commands are not delivered via a
special MIME message, but rather XDELIVER is the batch SMTP
processor. Moreover, since XDELIVER exposes SMTP extensions that are
available, the client need not make any assumptions about which SMTP
extensions are available.
Finally, XDELIVER reuses the CATENATE and IMAPURL extensions when
building the batch in order to allow inclusion of pre-composed
messages or editing of envelope parameters.
Formal Syntax
xdeliver-cmd = XDELIVER SP (CAPABILITY / text-literal )
Examples
The following example will pick up the message that has been
previously composed (via APPEND/CATENATE)
Example:
C: a004 XDELIVER CAPABILITY
S: * XDELIVER CAPABILITY (8BITMIME EXPN HELP)
C: a005 XDELIVER TEXT {123+}
C: EHLO
C: MAIL FROM: john@smith.com
C: RCPT TO: mooch@owatagu.siam.edu
C: DATA
C: URL /Inbox;UIDVALIDITY=9999/;UID=33;Section=BODY
.
S: * XDELIVER {321}
S: 220 mail.metastructure.net ESMTP
S: 250-mail.metastructure.net
S: 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
S: 250-AUTH=LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
S: 250-PIPELINING
S: 250 8BITMIME
S: 250 ok
S: 250 ok
S: 354 go ahead
S: 250 ok 1126337586 qp 28229
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 31]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
5.3.7. Note on XDELIVER, SMTP and Lemonade Profile
A P-IMAP server MAY advertise support for SMTP. A P-IMAP client MAY
then select to rely on SMTP instead of XDELIVER. This of course may
reduce the forward / reply without download capabilities that may be
available.
A server MAY also advertise via capability support for Lemonade
Profile [LEMONADEPROFILE] or the subset of commands (see
[LEMONADEPROFILE] needed to support forward without download. In such
case, the client MAY rely on the Lemonade profile forward without
download mechanisms.
It is generally not expected that mobile clients will run mailing
list services from mobile devices, utilize large distribution lists,
or run automated mail notification services. Therefore, XDELIVER is
not designed to support SMTP functions that take advantage of full
control of the SMTP envelope, or SMTP extensions like NOTARY.
In general, because of mobile device resource constraints, and
corporate firewall and security policies, XDELIVER is easier to
deploy for mobile devices, than exposing and restricting SMTP
services to mobile devices, especially those devices without VPN
functionality.
5.3.8. XCONVERT BODY and BINARY data item extension
The client and server SHOULD support the IMAP Binary specification
[RFC3516] and declare it via CAPABILITY.
XCONVERT is a FETCH extension used to transcode the media type of a
leaf MIME part into another media type, and/or the same media type,
with different encoding parameters. It adds new options to the
section-spec part of the BODY data item, a new FETCH response data
item BODYPARTSTRUCTURE, and new response codes. It is also expected
to work with IMAP BINARY data item extension, whose grammar is
modified as well.
XCONVERTs syntax is modeled after the HEADER.FIELDS syntax in
RFC3501, and is generally structured as:
BODY[section-part.XCONVERT[.STRICT] (media type/subtype
(parameters))]
BODY.PEEK[section-part.XCONVERT[.STRICT] (media type/subtype
(parameters))]<partial>
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 32]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
BINARY[section-part.XCONVERT[.STRICT] (media type/subtype
(parameters))]<partial>
BINARY.PEEK[section-part.XCONVERT[.STRICT] (media type/subtype
(parameters))]<partial>
BINARY.SIZE[section-part.XCONVERT[.STRICT] (media type/subtype
(parameters))]<partial>
Example: The client fetches body part section 3 in the message with
the message sequence number of 2 and asks to have that attachment
converted to pdf format.
C: a001 FETCH 2 BODY[3.XCONVERT (APPLICATION/PDF)]
S: * 2 FETCH (BODYPARTSTRUCTURE[3] ("APPLICATION PDF" () NIL
NIL "Base64" 2135 NIL NIL NIL) BODY[3] {2135}
<the document in .pdf format>
)
S: a001 OK FETCH COMPLETED
Example: The client requests for conversion of a text/html section
as text/plain and asks for a charset of us-ascii. The server cannot
respect the charset request because there are non-us-ascii characters
in the html code. Thus, in the untagged response, the server returns
the charset of UTF-8 and utilizes a content transfer encoding capable
of representing the full 8-bit range, along with the converted text.
C: a001 FETCH 2 BODY[3.XCONVERT (text/plain (charset us-
ascii))]
S: * 2 FETCH (BODYPARTSTRUCTURE[3] ("TEXT" "PLAIN" () NIL
NIL "Base64" 2135 181 NIL NIL NIL) BODY[3] {2135}
the document in text/plain format
)
S: a001 OK FETCH COMPLETED
Example: The client requests for conversion of a text/html section
as text/plain, but only wants 1000 bytes, starting from byte 2001.
C: a001 FETCH 2 BODY[3.XCONVERT (TEXT/PLAIN (CHARSET us-
ascii))]<2001.1000>
S: * 2 FETCH (BODYPARTSTRUCTURE[3] ("TEXT" "PLAIN" () NIL
NIL "7bit" 2135 181 NIL NIL NIL) BODY[3]<2001> {135}
bytes 2001 - 2135 of the document in text/plain format
)
S: a001 OK FETCH COMPLETED
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 33]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
The server is not required to respect a particular transcoding
request or its request parameters, although it MAY try to make a best
effort to fulfill that request. Indeed, the server may know a priori
information about the client obtained through a different mechanism
outside the scope of P-IMAP (e.g. dynamically through device
description mechanisms or when the device was associated to the
account). These preferences may be used to predefine what conversions
are possible. Ideally the client should request the same conversions.
In addition, this information may also allow attachment adaptation
(e.g. picture form factor) instead of solely format conversion.
5.3.9. FETCH response extensions
The BODYPARTSTRUCTURE data item is introduced when using the XCONVERT
extension. It follows the exact syntax specified in the [RFC3501]
BODYSTRUCTURE data item, but contains information for only the
converted part. All information contained in BODYPARTSTRUCTURE
pertains to the state of the part after it is converted, such as the
converted mime-type, sub-type, size, or charset. The client must
respect the return values and not assume the conversion request
succeeds.
5.3.10. Status responses, Response code extensions
Some transcodings may require parameters. If a transcoding request is
sent for a format which requires parameters, the server can reply
with a BAD response. Likewise, malformed mime types may also generate
BAD responses.
If the server is unable to perform the requested conversion because a
resource is unavailable (internal error, transcoding service down)
than a BAD response should be returned.
If a request is denied because of an operational error, such as lack
of disk space, or because the requested conversion for some reason
cannot be performed, and there is no fallback for this particular
device (such as the case where a proprietary document format has no
existing transcoding implementation, and the server recognizes that
the client has no default viewer for it), the server SHOULD return a
NO response.
Otherwise, the server should return an OK response. The client in
general can tell from the BODYPARTSTRUCTURE response whether or not
its request was honored exactly, but may not know exactly why it
different.
The following extension response codes are provided for OK and NO
responses to disambiguate those situations, or warn about possible
important data loss.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 34]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
INFORMATIONLOSS the conversion was satisfied for conversion
request, but it may have resulted in the loss of important data
(primarily of use for loss of text data, since richmedia is often
compressed with loss)
BADPARAMETERS ( xconvert-params ) the listed parameters were
not understood, or could not be honored for the reasons noted in
section-text
SERVEROVERRIDE the server overrode the request because it
determined it could substitute a better one based on preferences,
device capability knowledge, or server policy.
5.3.11. Formal Syntax
The following syntax specification uses the augmented Backus-Naur
Form (ABNF) notation as used in [ABNF], and incorporates by reference
the Core Rules defined in that document.
This syntax augments the grammar specified in [RFC3501] and
[RFC3516].
In the ABNF syntax section-binary of [RFC3516], is amended to:
section-binary = "[" [section-part [.XCONVERT[.STRICT] SP
convert-params] "]"
In the ABNF syntax msg-att-static of [RFC3501], is amended to:
msg-att-static =/ BODYPARTSTRUCTURE ( body-type-1part )
In the ABNF syntax resp-text-code of [RFC3501], is amended to:
Resp-text-code =/ INFORMATIONLOSS / SERVEROVERRIDE /
BADPARAMETERS SP ( bad-param-list )
bad-param-list = transcoding-params
In addition, the following ABNF describes the syntax of the
GETANNOTATION entries in Section 4.2
convert-entry-req = available-conversions / available-
transcoding-parameters
available-conversions = /convert/ from-mime-type
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 35]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
from-mime-type = * /(astring [/ (astring / *)]
; i.e. * or type/* or type/subtype
from-concrete-mime-type = astring / astring
; i.e. type/subtype
to-mime-type = astring / astring
available-transcoding-parameters = /convert/ from-concrete-
mime-type / to-mime-type
;i.e.
/convert/fromtype/fromsubtype/totype/tosubtype
Finally, two standard annotation attributes are defined. Under
available-conversions entry, there will be an attribute named
types.shared with the following ABNF:
types-shared-value = from-concrete-mime-type(; from-concrete-
mime-type)*
And under an available-transcoding-parameters entry, there will be an
attribute named params.shared with the following ABNF:
params-shared-value = transcoding-param-name (; transcoding-
param-name)*
params = "(" (media-basic / default-conversion) [SP "("
transcoding-params ")"] ")"
transcoding-params = transcoding-param-name SP transcoding-param-
value
*(SP transcoding-param-name SP transcoding-param-value)
transcoding-param-name = string
transcoding-param-value = string
default-conversion = "NIL" "NIL"
In the ABNF syntax section-binary of [RFC3516], is amended to:
section-binary = "[" [section-part [. SP convert-params]
"]"
5.3.12. XVFOLDER
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 36]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
The XVFOLDER extension is present in any IMAP4 implementation which
returns XVFOLDER as one of the supported capabilities in the
CAPABILITY command.
A virtual folder is an IMAP4 folder with attached search criteria.
The search criteria specify the backing mailbox, as well as a subset
IMAP SEARCH grammar which may be applied to the immutable properties
of messages in the backing mailbox. Once created, all operations
applied to the virtual mailbox, such as APPEND and STORE, are
actually applied to the backing mailbox. For all intents and
purposes, the virtual folder looks and behaves like a real IMAP4
folder.
Any changes made to the underlying folder must pass the search
criteria for the virtual folder before being visible. UIDs are
preserved, and as well as the UIDVALIDITY value. In general, most
mailbox state and metadata present on the backing folder should be
identical on the virtual folder, except where it doesnt make sense.
(e.g. EXISTS, RECENT, in general, values which are based on then
number of messages which have/do not have a certain property in the
mailbox)
Message sequence numbers will be different, but the order of the
messages in the sequence, and the ordering of UIDs, MUST be
preserved.
From the clients perspective, whether or not a mailbox is a vfolder
is not visible, and for all intents and purposes, it appears as any
other mailbox name. This includes the ability for a new virtual
folder to be created by using another virtual folder as a backing
mailbox.
For the purposes of this draft, immutability refers to message
flags and non-immutable messages annotations.
Format Syntax:
The following syntax specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur
Form (ABNF) notation. Elements not defined here can be found in
the formal syntax of the [ABNF], [RFC3501], and [ABNFEXTEND].
The create ABNF grammar in [RFC3501] is hereby modified to the
grammar defined in [ABNFEXTEND]. An additional CREATE param
LPSEARCH is introduced whose value is a list containing the backing
store mailbox and the search parameters.
create_param =/ XPSEARCH SP ( backing-mailbox psearch )
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 37]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
;; conforms to generic "create-param" syntax as
defined in [ABNFEXTEND]
backing-mailbox = mailbox
psearch = search-program
; defined in [ABNFEXTEND], amended by [WITHIN]
6.
Considerations beyond the P-IMAP protocol
6.1.
P-IMAP client security
It is recommended that P-IMAP clients SHOULD encrypt the email stored
on the client and relies on password or other authentication to
access the e-mail client.
To ensure revocation of the client when it is lost or compromised, it
is recommended that clients SHOULD support the notification extension
LOCK_DOWN described in Appendix B.2 to lock the client and delete all
available e-mails.
6.2.
P-IMAP client updates
It is recommended that P-IMAP client SHOULD be designed and deployed
in ways that allow easy updates as the protocol evolves. Until
standardization is completed, it is expected that P-IMAP will evolve
from release to release.
Although servers MAY seek backward compatibility from release to
release; it is rather encouraged to provides ways to update the
client when required by the server.
Recommended approaches include:
- server being knowledgeable of the client revision support
- server able to provision over the air (e.g. OMA Device Management
and OMA Client Provisioning) the new client or able to notify (e.g.
via email) for update over cradle, or other means of the client.
6.3.
P-IMAP client-side behavior
P-IMAP clients MAY allow additional user preferences like not
reflecting to the server changes that have taken place on the client
(e.g. email deleted on the client) or some changes on the server
(e.g. flag changes or deleted email on the server). In such cases,
the client is responsible for maintaining its own state and it MUST
make sure that it behaves with respect to the server as if it had
reflected all the changes as expected by a P-IMAP server. This is
further discussed in Appendix G.2.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 38]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
6.4.
Minimum binding interoperability requirements
For now, it is recommended to always support at the minimum
HTTP/HTTPS binding for P-IMAP with EMN (SMS, GSM SMS or WAP WDP) for
out-of-band notifications and IDLE over HTTP/HTTPS for in-band. The
server SHOULD then also support other bindings to offer
interoperability of preferred by the client.
Security Considerations
The protocol calls for the same security requirements for an in-
response and in-band connectivity mode as IMAP.
For the out-of-band connectivity mode, servers should use encryption
methods for notifications if sensitive information is included in the
payload of that notification.
When an implementation of P-IMAP is proxy-based, this may create new
security issues. These issues are discussed in detail in Appendix C,
because the issues are dependent on the implementation of this
protocol rather than inherent to the protocol itself.
The use of HTTPS as described in appendix A can provide end-to-end
security.
On bandwidth limited mobile networks where users pay per data volumes
and/or notifications, spam may become an important issue. It can be
mitigated with appropriate filters and server-side spam prevention
tools. These are of course outside the scope of the P-IMAP protocol.
Section 6.1 discusses encryption and passwords on the client.
It is also recommended that P-IMAP clients be explicitly registered
with the P-IMAP server through separate channels / application.
Exchanges should then be paired.
References
[ABNF] D. Crocker, et al. "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications:
ABNF, RFC 2234, November 1997.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2234
[BURL] Newman, C., "Message Composition", draft-ietf-lemonade-burl-xx
(work in progress).
[CATENATE] Resnick, P. IMAP CATENATE Extension, draft-ietf-
lemonade-catenate-xx.txt, (work in progress).
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 39]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
[CONDSTORE] Melnikov, A. and S. Hole, "IMAP Extension for Conditional
STORE", work in progress.
[CONNECT] Melnikov, A. et al. "IMAP4 extension for quick reconnect",
draft-ietf-lemonade-reconnect-XX.txt, (work in progress)
[GSM03.40] GSM 03.40 v7.4.0 Digital cellular telecommunications
system (Phase 2+); Technical realization of the Short Message
Service (SMS). ETSI 2000
[IMAP-DISC] Melnikov, A. "Synchronization operations for
disconnected IMAP4 clients,
draft-melnikov-imap-disc-xx, (work in progress).
[IMAPURLbis] Newman, C, Melnikov, A. and Maes, S. H. "IMAP URL
Scheme, draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis-xx (work in progress).
[LEMONADEPROFILE] Maes, S.H. and Melnikov A., "Lemonade Profile",
draft-ietf-lemonade-profile-xx.txt, (work in progress).
[LEMONADEPROFILEBIS] Maes, S.H., Melnikov A. and D. Cridland, "
LEMONADE profile bis", draft-ietf-lemonade-profile-bis-xx.txt,
(work in progress).
[LITERAL+] Myers, J., "IMAP4 non-synchronizing literals", RFC 2088,
January 1997.
[MEMAIL] Maes, S.H., Lemonade and Mobile e-mail", draft-maes-
lemonade-mobile-email-xx.txt, (work in progress).
[OMA-EN] Open Mobile Alliance Email Notification Version 1.0, August
2002. http://www.openmobilealliance.org/tech/docs/EmailNot/OMA-
Push-EMN-V1_0-20020830-C.pdf
[OMA-ME-AD] Open Mobile Alliance Mobile Email Architecture Document,
(Work in progress). http://www.openmobilealliance.org/
[OMA-ME-RD] Open Mobile Alliance Mobile Email Requirement Document,
(Work in progress). http://www.openmobilealliance.org/
[OMA-DS] Open Mobile Alliance Data Synchronization, versions 1.1.2
and 1.2,
http://www.openmobilealliance.org/release_program/ds_v112.html,
http://www.openmobilealliance.org/release_program/ds_v12.html.
[OMA-STI] Open Mobile Alliance, Standard Transcoding Interface
Specification, version 1.0, [Work in progress]
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 40]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
(http://member.openmobilealliance.org/ftp/Public_documents/BAC/STI
/Permanent_documents/OMA-STI-V1_0-20050209-D.zip).
[OMA-vObject] Open Mobile Alliance, vObject Minimum Interoperability
Profile, v 1.0,
http://www.openmobilealliance.org/release_program/docs/CopyrightCl
ick.asp?pck=vObject&file=v1_0-20050118-C/OMA-TS-vObjectOMAProfile-
V1_0-20050118-C.pdf
[RFC1951] Deutsch, P. DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification
version 1.3, RFC1951, May 1996.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1951
[RFC2088] Myers, J. IMAP non-synchronizing literals, RFC2088,
January 1997.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2088
[RFC2119] Brader, S. "Keywords for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, March 1997.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119
[RFC2180] Gahrns, M. "IMAP4 Multi-Accessed Mailbox Practice", RFC
2180, July 1997.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2180
[RFC2192] Newman, C. IMAP URL Scheme, RFC 2192, September 1997.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2192.html
[RFC2222] Myers, J. "Simple Authentication and Security Layer
(SASL)", RFC 2222, October 1997.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2222
[RFC2234] Crocker, D. and Overell, P. "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications", RFC 2234, Nov 1997.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2234
[RFC2420] Kummert, H. "The PPP Triple-DES Encryption Protocol
(3DESE)", RFC 2420, September 1998.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2420
[RFC2442] Freed, N., Newman, C., Belissent, J. and Hoy, M., "The
Batch SMTP Media Type", RFC 2442, November 1998.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2442.txt?number=2442.
[RFC2616] Fielding, R. et al. "Hypertext Transfer Protocol --
HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 41]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
[RFC2617] Franks, J. et al. "HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest
Access Authentication", RFC 2617, June 1999.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2617
[RFC2683] Leiba, B. "IMAP4 Implementation Recommendations", RFC 2683
Sep 1999.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2683
[RFC2177] Leiba, B. "IMAP4 IDLE Command", RFC 2177, June 1997.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2177
[RFC2818] Rescorla, E. "HTTP over TLS", RFC 2818, May 2000.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2818
[RFC2822] Resnick, P. "Internet Message Format", RFC 2822, April
2001. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2822
[RFC2831] Leach, P., and Newman, C. "Using Digest Authentication as a
SASL Mechanism", RFC 2831, May 2000.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2831
[RFC3028] Showalter, T. "Sieve: A Mail Filtering Language", RFC 3028,
January 2001. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3028.txt?number=3028
[RFC3501] Crispin, M. "IMAP4, Internet Message Access Protocol
Version 4 rev1", RFC 3501, March 2003.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3501
[RFC3502] Crispin, M. " Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) -
MULTIAPPEND Extension", RFC 3502, March 2003.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3502
[RFC3516] Nerenberg, L. IMAP4 Binary Content Extension, RFC3516,
April 2003.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3516
[UIDPLUS] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) -
UIDPLUS extension", work in progress, draft-crispin-imap-
rfc2359bis-XX.txt.
[WAPWDP] Wireless Datagram Protocol, Version 14-Jun-2001, Wireless
Application Protocol WAP-259-WDP- 20010614-aWAP (WDP)
Normative Appendices
A.
Implementation Guidelines for Using HTTP with P-IMAP
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 42]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
This appendix describes how HTTP can optionally be used to transfer
P-IMAP commands and responses (as an optional HTTP binding). This
binding is intended to facilitate the use of P-IMAP in deployments
involving a variety of intermediaries, and offers a standardized
alternative to de facto proprietary implementations of such a
feature.
The need for an optional HTTP binding is driven by the needs of the
mobile network operator community (see [MEMAIL], [OMA-ME-RD]), where
the reuse of an existing and well-understood technology will allow
operators to apply their experience in solving practical deployment
issues. Specifically, HTTP allow operators to reuse a similar setup
and model that is already used for many other similar and related
services, such as certain proprietary push e-mail and synchronization
offerings, OMA Data Synchronization, Web services and Web access.
Using HTTP/HTTPS can simplify deployment in a corporate network
through the potential use of a reverse proxy to achieve end-to-end
encryption. This also has the advantage of not requiring changes to
any firewall configurations and reduces the concerns that this often
presents to corporation. In general the solution is compatible with
any existing firewall. A reverse proxy can also support deployment
models that offer roles to other service providers in the value
chains, as discussed in [OMA-ME-AD].
The security, encryption and compression capabilities used with HTTP
and already implemented in a wide range of existing mobile device,
which be also be reused.
Studies have also shown that a persistent HTTP session has usually
proven more resilient than an IMAP IDLE over TCP connection over an
unreliable bearer such as a GPRS-based mobile network.
The use of HTTP as an underlying protocol for other application
protocols has received much attention (see [RFC3205]). In particular,
the concern exists that this circumvents firewall security policies.
Another concern is the potential misuse or neglect of HTTP semantics
by the application protocol that uses HTTP as a substrate.
Note that if the suppression of P-IMAP (or indeed any other
application) traffic on HTTP/HTTPS is an issue, firewall
administrators can still prevent such passage and this can provide
incentives to re-configure firewalls to allow solutions on other
transports (e.g. TLS) or offer the HTTP-based solution using another
provisioned port (via the P-IMAP XGETPIMAPPREFS (L_HTTP_TUNNEL)
instruction). The aim, therefore, is to allow for the use of this
solution in the widest possible set of circumstances by codifying a
standard way to do so that works with existing, deployed (i.e., HTTP
only) firewalls, while explicitly allowing the possibility of
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 43]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
detecting and filtering such traffic in deployments using the HTTP
Content-Type in deployments where this is not permitted.
To use HTTP/HTTPS as the transfer protocol for IMAP commands and
responses between the IMAP client and server, the client MUST send an
HTTP POST request to the server, and embed IMAP commands (commands to
an IMAPv4 Rev1 server or IMAP servers supporting Lemonade extensions)
in the body of the request. A server MUST reject a HTTP GET request
from the client. The content-type header of the POST request MUST be
set to "application/vnd.lemonade". Multiple IMAP commands may be
included in one POST request. In general, the HTTP server is expected
to preserve session state between HTTP commands to the best of its
ability, therefore the client does not need to reauthenticate and
reissue a SELECT until it receives an (IMAP) error response showing
that it is not authenticated.
In what follows, the term Lemonade client/server is used to refer to
a client/server that supports both IMAPv4 Rev1 as well as any
LEMONADE extensions.
When the HTTP binding is used, the Lemonade server listens on
whatever port has been configured for this.
The following is an example of a possible Lemonade HTTP request:
POST /lemonadeServletPPath HTTP/1.1 <CRLF>
Content-Type: application/vnd.lemonade <CRLF>
[other headers]
<CRLF>
(<tag> SP <Lemonade command> <CRLF> | literal )
[(<tag> SP <Lemonade command> <CRLF> | literal )]
The Lemonade command MUST be plain text (7bit).
Multiple Lemonade commands MAY be sent on the same request. Thus
Lemonade commands must be tagged. The client must be able to deal
with recovering from errors when commands are batched. See RFC2442
Batch SMTP for a further discussion. In general, if a command is
expected to produce a synchronized literal or continuation request,
it MUST be the last command in the batch.
The Content-Type header is the only HTTP headers that MUST be sent to
a Lemonade server. Other headers such as Cache-Control MAY be
included.
When the Lemonade server sends back a response it is in following
format:
HTTP/1.1 <HTTP Status Code> <CRLF>
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 44]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
Content-Type: text/plain <CRLF>
<CRLF>
[<untagged responses>]
<tag> SP <Lemonade Server response> <CRLF>
[<untagged responses>]
<tag> SP <Lemonade Server response> <CRLF>
Notes:
The Lemonade Server uses the following HTTP status codes, and what
each code indicates is given below:
- 100
- This indicates the presence of a synchronizing literal or
continuation request. The server is waiting for more data from
the client (another HTTP request) before continuing. If the
HTTP request includes batched commands after the command which
generates a continuation request or synchronized literal, the
server MUST generate a 5xx request.
- 200
- This indicates normal execution of the Lemonade commands
from an IMAP perspective. The client should further parse
the response body to get the tagged responses to the
commands and process those accordingly.
- 401
- This indicates that the execution of the IMAP commands might
have been successful, but the session is no longer
authenticated. The client should try to reauthenticate to the
IMAP server, and then resend the commands.
- 5xx
- This indicates that at least one command was
malformed/protocol level error, or, a command could not
complete due to a problem in the IMAP server. In conforming to
HTTP semantics, this means the IMAP server responses such as
BAD or NO on a tagged response generate a HTTP 500 response
code.
When using HTTP to transfer IMAP commands and responses, the client
SHOULD utilize built-in features of HTTP to their advantage. For
example, the client SHOULD use HTTPS instead of HTTP whenever
possible, since HTTPS has built in encryption and MAY have
compression capabilities. STARTTLS should not be needed in this
case, as it just requires additional overhead without any additional
benefit.
HTTP can be used in both in-response and in-band modes. Details
about these transport modes are given in the following two
subsections.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 45]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
A.1.
Non-Persistent HTTP for In-response Connectivity Mode
If the client uses a traditional HTTP connection (either by
establishing a different socket for each HTTP request to the Lemonade
server, or by reusing the same socket for all HTTP requests, but
sending each request under its own header), it has in-response
connectivity to the server. The client can issue as many commands as
it would like in one HTTP request to the server, and the server
responds by sending back one HTTP response with all the responses to
all the commands in the HTTP request. With this connectivity mode,
the IDLE command cannot be issued. Other commands that use a
continuation response or synchronized literal cannot be issued unless
they are the last command in the batch. [LITERAL+] SHOULD be used to
eliminate synchronized literals when using APPEND.
In order for the server to identify separate HTTP requests as
belonging to the same session, an in-response HTTP client needs to
accept cookies. A session-id is passed in the cookie to identify the
session.
Example: the headers for a HTTP In-response Response after the client
has issued its first HTTP request to the server.
HTTP/1.1 <HTTP Status Code> <CRLF>
Content-Type: text/plain <CRLF>
Set-Cookie:JSESSIONID=94571a8530d91e1913bfydafa;
path=/lemonade<CRLF>
<CRLF>
[<untagged responses>]
<tag> SP <Lemnade Server response> <CRLF>
[[<untagged responses>]
<tag> SP <Lemonade Server response> <CRLF>]
Example: the headers for a HTTP In-response Response after the client
has issued its first HTTP request to the server, with the final
command generating a continuation request.
HTTP/1.1 100 Continue <CRLF>
Content-Type: text/plain <CRLF>
Set-Cookie:JSESSIONID=94571a8530d91e1913bfydafa;
path=/lemonade<CRLF>
<CRLF>
[<untagged responses>]
<tag> SP <Lemnade Server response> <CRLF>
+continuation-request
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 46]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
The client must then save this cookie and send it back to the server
with the next request in order for the server to reattach these
commands to the same session as the previous commands.
POST /lemonadeServletPath HTTP/1.1 <CRLF>
Content-Type: application/vnd.lemonade <CRLF>
Cookie: JSESSIONID=94571a8530d91e1913bfydafa
[other headers]
<CRLF>
<tag> SP <Lemonade command> <CRLF>
[<tag> SP <Lemonade command> <CRLF>]
A.2.
Using Persistent HTTP/HTTPS + Chunked Transfer Encoding for In-band
Connectivity Mode
It is possible to use persistent HTTP or persistent HTTPS plus
chunked- transfer-encoding so that the server can instantly send
notifications to the client while a session is open. The client
needs to open a persistent connection and keep it active. In this
case, the HTTP headers must be sent the first time the client device
opens the connection to the Lemonade Server and these headers MUST
set the transfer coding to be chunk-encoded [RFC2616, Sec. 3.6.1].
All subsequent client-server requests are written to the open
connection, without needing any additional headers negotiations. The
server can use this open channel to push events to the client device
at any time. In this case, the client SHOULD NOT accept cookies.
The client must send the HTTP headers one time only:
POST /lemonadeServletPath HTTP/1.1 <CRLF>
Content-Type: application/vnd.lemonade <CRLF>
Connection: keep-alive <CRLF>
Pragma: no-cache <CRLF>
Transfer-Encoding: chunked <CRLF>
The server responds with the following header:
HTTP/1.1 <HTTP Status Code> <CRLF>
Cache-Control: private
Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=100 (or other suitable setting)
Connection: Keep-Alive
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/plain
Then the client can send a command anytime it wants with the
following format:
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 47]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
<length of Lemonade command, including bytes in CRLF> <CRLF>
<tag> SP <Lemonade command> <CRLF>
<CRLF>
And example of an actual client command is:
e <CRLF>
2 CAPABILITY<CRLF>
<CRLF>
The server responds to each command with as many untagged responses
as needed, and one tagged response, where each response is in the
format that follows:
<length of a single response, including bytes in CRLF> <CRLF>
<tagged or untagged response> <CRLF>
<CRLF>
An actual Server response might be:
d5 <CRLF>
* CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 AUTH=LOGIN NAMESPACE SORT MULTIAPPEND
LITERAL+ UIDPLUS IDLE XORACLE X-ORACLE-LIST X-ORACLE-COMMENT X-
ORACLE-QUOTA X-ORACLE-PREF X-ORACLE-MOVE X-ORACLE-DELETE ACL X-
ORACLE-PASSWORD LDELIVER LZIP LCONVERT LFILTER LSETPREF LGETPREF
<CRLF> <CRLF>
1b <CRLF>
2 OK CAPABILITY completed <CRLF>
<CRLF>
Note however that the HTTP protocol is in general not meant to be
used in such a way. To maintain such an open channel might be a
practical challenge to proxies/firewalls, which might not forward the
requests chunk by chunk to the server, and meanwhile route responses
back to the client chunk by chunk. Consequently the session closes.
Chunked transfer encoding requests MAY not be honored by an HTTP
server. In cases where such requests are denied, the client should be
prepared to use the non-chunked encoding technique from section 2.1
The same challenges exist for TCP session.
In any case, the session can be automatically started again by the
client after a lost connection or by the server through out-of-band;
after some defined time-out.
A.3.
Using HTTP CONNECT
If a HTTP proxy server is available to the client which supports the
HTTP CONNECT method, and the IMAP server the user wishes to reach
allows external connections outside the destination networks
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 48]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
firewall, the client may wish to tunnel a regular TCP connection
through the HTTP proxy.
See [LUOTONEN] or section 5.2 of [RFC2817] for a detailed description
of the technique. Note that HTTP Proxy servers may not honor all
CONNECT requests, and may in fact, limit CONNECT requests to a small
number of common ports, such as 80, 443, 8080, etc. It is advised
that networks wishing to allow their users to use this feature allow
clients within their network to CONNECT to ports 25, 143, 587, and
993.
B.
Event Payload
B.1.
Event Payload in Clear Text for P-IMAP Sessions
The event payload for a P-IMAP session follows the general format
explained in Section 4, and is in clear text. P-IMAP treats the event
as a signal to the client to fetch the information on the server that
awaits it.
In-band anything sent from the server is treated as an wake-up
signal.
B.2.
Out-of-band Channel Event Payload
One suggested payload for notifications is that suggested by the OMA,
see [OMA-EN]. This notification basically informs the client that
some push event has happened on the server, so it must connect to
fetch the information.
P-IMAP treats the event as a client wake up event to fetch the
information on the server that awaits it. The client may present
other behaviors that exploit additional information provided in the
notification. However this is out of scope of the P-IMAP
specifications.
Wake-up events consists of the following payload: <emn
mailbox="mailat:john.doe@somewhere.com"
timestamp="date_format_as_specified_in_[EMN]"></emn>
When the client finally connects, the P-IMAP server has opportunity
to send other pending events for this client.
Example: new message arrives on the server and this is notified via
out-of-band.
S: pushes SMS with the following text:
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 49]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
<emn
mailbox="mailat:joe@foo.com"
timestamp="2004-02-20T06:40:00Z">
</emn>
C: needs to connect and send any command to get the pending events
and act upon them.
C: A00 Login joe password
S: * SESSION SELECTED
S: * FOLDER INBOX
S: * 100 EXITS
S: * 87 EXPUNGE
S: * 90 FETCH (FLAGS \Seen)
S: A00 OK LOGIN completed
C: must now act on the events on the order they are received,
meaning, first perform a FETCH to get new message, then expunge
message 87 and change flags of message 90.
If EXTENDED notification format is supported by the client, the
following notification may be send instead of the wake-up event as:
The notification message is of the form:
<tag> <notification seq no> <client-email-account -name> <event>
[<uid>, <sender>, <date>, <time>, <subject>, [<body.]]
where <tag> is <tag> is _%$P-IMAP$%_,
and <event> is one of
NEW_MESSAGE
DELETED_MESSAGE
CHANGED_MESSAGE
SYNC
FULL_SYNC
STATE_COMPARISON_SYNC
NEW_ENC_KEY
LOCK_DOWN
Except for the <tag>, the notification message is encrypted using the
encryption key.
The different tags are:
NEW_MESSAGE: a new message has arrived on the server
DELETED_MESSAGE: a message has been deleted on the server
CHANGED_MESSAGE: a message has changed on the server
SYNC: Initiate an incremental synchronization
FULL_SYNC: Initiate a full synchronization
STATE_COMPARISON_SYNC: Compare state
NEW_ENC_KEY: New encryption key is available to be obtained by
XPROVISION
LOCK_DOWN: Lock the client (in case of lost device).
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 50]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
The latter assumes that the client is able to support client lock to
prevent usage / access to data of lost devices, or in general when
desired by the server administrator.
In the case of new encryption (NEW_ENC_KEY) and to cater for the
unreliable nature of the notification channel, messages encrypted
using old encryption key from a device MUST be accepted be the server
until the server receives a message encrypted using the new key. From
that point onward it MUST only accept the messages encrypted using
the new key.
In the case of SYNC requests (incremental synchronization), the
client sends its messages that are to be sent, describes the delete
or change status operations to do on the server or and sending a NOOP
message to the server and processing the responses. New messages are
fetched using UID FETCH command with the range (lastUID + 1):*. Where
lastUID is that lastUID received so far. This typically happens when
the server determines that the session is valid and the UID VALIDITY
(See [IMAP-DISC]) is the same in client and server.
In the case of FULL_SYNC requests (full synchronization), the client
sends its messages that are to be sent, discards delete or change
status operations to do on the server, discard its local emails (e.g.
in INBOX) and populating the Inbox with messages using the FETCH 1:*
command. It also rebuilds the UID-Sequence map. Full synchronization
also takes care of the new client whose UID_VALIDITY is initially set
to -1. This typically happens when the server determines that the
session is invalid and the UID VALIDITY is different in client and
server.
In the case of STATE COMPARISON_SYNC requests (state comparison
synchronization), the client sends its messages that are to be sent,
describes the delete or change status operations to do on the server,
requests for and updates the flag values for each of the messages in
the Inbox folder of the client message store, removes message from
the Client Message Store that are no longer in Server Message Store
and requests for new messages. This typically happens when the server
determines that the session is valid and the UID VALIDITY is
different in client and server.
B.3.
Out-of-band SMS channel binding
One method for delivering wake-up notifications is by pushing the
notification payload as a binary SMS message. Upon receiving an SMS,
a client would then parse the payload, determine if it is a P-IMAP
notification or some other SMS message, and process the message
appropriately.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 51]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
This has the unfortunate side effect of forcing the client to parse
every message trying to sense what kind of message it is. The
proposed mechanism to fix this is to utilize the binary
SMS User Data Header (UDH) to specify a destination port, according
to the Application Port
Addressing Scheme in [GSM03.40] or alternatively, on CDMA networks,
to use the WAP WDP mapping to GSM SMS [WAPWDP].
Although any port number is usable, it might make sense to use port
143 for consistency, which is the IANA IMAP port. Thus, OMA EMN or
extended format notifications for P-IMAP should be sent to port 143
via GSM SMS or WAP WDP. The client upon receiving the SMS will check
the port number, and if the port is the P-IMAP port, the message will
be routed to the appropriate P-IMAP client application for
processing.
Because such mechanisms are network specific, a P-IMAP server should
determine if a port specific SMS or WAP WDP mapping can be used based
on knowledge of the device / network or on strategies that determine
if the device reacts to such notifications. However, a client may
also declare it / selecting the out-of-band notification channel as
GSMSMS or WAPWDP as for any other notification channel.
C.
Security Issues for Proxy-Based Implementations of P-IMAP
In some implementations of P-IMAP, the client may connect to a proxy
that sits in an operator network, but the backend email storage
server sits in a separate enterprise network. The enterprise network
is assumed to be secure, but the operator network may not be trusted.
If unencrypted information lies in the operator network, that
information is vulnerable to attacks.
If the P-IMAP extensions are all implemented in the enterprise
network, then the proxy on the carrier should be an encrypted SSL
pass-through proxy. SSL ensures confidentiality and integrity of the
proxied datastream, ensuring that the proxy cannot monitor the
content of messages, nor inject commands to modify or corrupt the
enterprise email server to corrupt the user's mailbox.
The proxy is unaware of the encryption keys and thus cannot encrypt
any data. Without the encryption key, this proxy cannot see any of
the information sent from the client, nor can it send any bogus
commands to the backend enterprise email server to corrupt the user's
mailbox. The additional cost for this design is that the backend
enterprise email server and the client devices must have additional
processing to handle this encryption.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 52]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
If the P-IMAP server is implemented as a backend IMAP server with
additional command processing done on the proxy, there are more
complex security issues. This proxy must be able to send commands to
the backend server to accomplish its tasks, as well as read IMAP
response syntax information coming from the backend server. An
attacker who compromises the proxy thus can send commands to the
backend to change the state of the mail storage, possibly corrupting
it. In addition, it can read responses from the mail server that
might contain confidential email information. This proxy may also
send bogus responses back to the client. Clearly, this setup is not
an ideal one and many complications that make this problem complex to
solve. The suggestion recommended is to remedy the problem of
unencrypted, untagged FETCH responses that may contain confidential
information. Sensitive data may be encrypted and sent via an
encrypted literal to the client as detailed in the XENCRYPTED
extension. XENCRYPTED (see Section 5.1.5) should be used in any
untagged FETCH responses, which contain encrypted message information
to be passed through the P-IMAP proxy on the operator network. The
key exchange for encryption should not occur through the proxy unless
the key can be derived during a SASL authentication exchange.
Otherwise, it must be done through another channel: manually entered
by user (e.g. password), or via an HTTP SSL request to the enterprise
server. Any other additional server responses containing sensitive
information (passwords, etc.) should be XENCRYPTED. The server
should implement 3DES encryption and use the client's password as the
key.
It is beyond the scope of this document to define the implementation
of transcoding services. In general, it is recommended that they
reside within the same domain as the IMAP server, and are not
performed by third party services, which may compromise the privacy
of the data being transcoded.
D.
XCONVERT transcoding parameters
P-IMAP servers MAY support additional transcoding parameters for each
media type. All P-IMAP compliant servers MUST minimally support
recognition of charset and encoding parameters for text/* mime types,
although they may decline to honor some requests. For media types
other than text, it is beyond the scope of this document to define
conversion parameters. In general however, P-IMAP compliant servers
MAY choose to support additional parameters, and if so, they SHOULD
follow the OMA STI 1.0 spec [OMA-STI] adopting the same parameter
names as defined in second 5.2.4 and above for the most popular
image/*, video/*, and audio/* codecs
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 53]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
As an example, in section 5.2.6.2 of [OMA-STI], the parameters
"width" and "height" are defined. The following example illustrates
how these OMA STI parameters can be used with XCONVERT.
C: a001 UID FETCH 100 BINARY[2.XCONVERT (IMAGE JPG (WIDTH
128 HEIGHT 96))]
S: * 2 FETCH (UID 100 BODYPARTSTRUCTURE[2] ("IMAGE" "JPG"
() NIL NIL "8bit" 4182 NIL NIL NIL) BINARY[2] {4182}
<this part of a document is a rescaled image in JPG format
with width=128, height=96.>
)
S: a001 OK UID FETCH COMPLETED
E.
Note on XDELIVER, SMTP and Lemonade Profile
A server MAY always rather support SMTP instead of XDELIVER. A client
MAY then select to rely on SMTP instead of XDELIVER. This of course
may reduce the forward / reply without download capabilities that may
be available.
A server MAY also advertise via capability support for Lemonade
Profile [LEMONADEPROFILE] or the subset of commands (see
[LEMONADEPROFILE] needed to support forward without download. In such
case, the client MAY rely on the Lemonade profile forward without
download mechanisms.
In general, because of mobile device resource constraints, and
corporate firewall and security policies, XDELIVER is easier to
deploy for mobile devices, than exposing and restricting SMTP
services to mobile devices, especially those devices without VPN
functionality.
Non-Normative Appendices
F.
Use Cases
In this section some use cases on P-IMAP are presented so that it is
possible to correctly understand concepts and message flow.
F.1.
State Comparison-Based Sync
Each time a client logs into a new P-IMAP session, it must perform a
state comparison-based sync. To synchronize with the server, the
client needs to fetch all the new messages, and all the flags of the
old messages.
The client has N messages in a given folder with highest UID = X and
is disconnected from the P-IMAP server. It connects to the server
and performs the following command:
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 54]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
First, it retrieves all the new messages.
C: A01 UID FETCH X+1:* ALL
S: * m FETCH ...
S: ... <more new messages if they exist>
S: A01 OK FETCH completed
The client stores all this information on the device and displays
it. Next, it wishes to sync up the old messages.
C: A02 FETCH 1:m-1 (UID FLAGS)
S: * 1 FETCH (UID 3242 FLAGS (\Seen ...))
S: ... <info for 2 through n-1>
S: * n FETCH (UID 3589 FLAGS (\Seen ...))
S: A02 OK FETCH completed
F.2.
Event-Based Sync
During a P-IMAP session, the client will receive events in the form
of untagged EXISTS, RECENT, EXPUNGE, or FETCH responses. The client
must respond to these events. Sometimes, it will receive these
events by polling, by issuing a P-IMAP command, such as NOOP. It can
also use IDLE so that the server can push events to the client. The
example following shows how the client acts during an IDLE command,
but it should also take the same actions (minus firing and exiting
IDLE mode) when it receives these events through polling.
A client can choose to issue an IDLE command to get events pushed to
it, or it can receive events from polling using NOOP or any other
IMAP command. First the client issues the IDLE command:
C: A02 IDLE
S: + Ready for argument
Now the client can receive any of the three following untagged
responses from the server.
When the client receives an EXISTS/RECENT response from the server:
S: * 501 EXISTS
First, the client must exit from this IDLE command.
C: DONE
S: A02 OK IDLE completed
Next, the client retrieves this new message using a FETCH command.
C: A02 FETCH 501 ALL
S: * 501 FETCH ...
S: A02 OK FETCH completed
The client returns to IDLE mode by issuing another IDLE command.
C: A03 IDLE
S: + Ready for argument
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 55]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
When the client receives an EXPUNGE response from the server:
S: * 25 EXPUNGE
The client deletes this message from the client device, as it has
been removed permanently from the folder. The client can remain in
IDLE mode.
When the client receives an untagged FETCH response from the server,
either signally a flag change to an old message or a new message:
S: * 101 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted))
The client updates the information on the device for this message
appropriately.
G.
Other Issues
G.1.
Using a Side Channel for a P-IMAP session
In some cases, it may be more efficient for a mobile client to
connect to a P-IMAP session through a side channel rather than
directly. This side channel opens a P-IMAP session, acting as the
client device and must conform to all requires of the client in this
document. The requirement is that the side channel must ensure that
the client is in sync with the mobile repository.
An example would be if a mobile client connected to a desktop on a
cradle, and then that desktop opens a P-IMAP session as the mobile
client via a fast connection. The desktop should then retrieve the
state of the client device and modify it using event-based or state-
comparison-based synchronization over the cradle. The connection
from the client to the server over the cradle and then the desktop to
server connection might be much faster or easier than any connection
the client could maintain itself. The desktop might also perform
most of the computation needed for a state-comparison-based
synchronization, easing up the burden on the mobile client.
If the client uses some other kind of side channel that does not
connect to the P-IMAP server when checking email, it is the client's
responsibility to make sure to ignore pending events as appropriate.
G.2.
Client event filtering
It is recommended that a P-IMAP client allows the user to select
what client-side events are to be propagated to the server (e.g. are
messages read or deleted on the client to be read or deleted on the
server).
This is out-of-scope of the P-IMAP specifications.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 56]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
A client may keep track of such changes and:
- not transmit them to the server via P-IMAP
- selectively present to the user status changes later received
from the server (e.g. not re-display a message locally deleted).
This is considered as client implementation specific behavior, out
of scope but recommended.
Future Work
[1] Investigate adding a client to server command to ask the server
to stop pushing notifications.
[2] Investigate the use of P-IMAP to trigger / notify other
applications.
[3] Integrate/relate more in detail with SIEVE [RFC3028] and related
work
[4] Cleanup and/or generalize the effect that the login deviceID has
on namespace collisions (e.g. can two VFOLDERs with the same name
exist)
In addition, as P-IMAP has now evolved significantly as part of the
[LEMONADEPROFILE] and [LEMONADEPROFILEBIS] work as well as OMA MEM
activities, we plan to release an update that re-builds the document
from the ground up to summarize in a cleaner manner the current
normative and informative statements.
Version History
Updates for Release 12
- Fix quick reconnect session terminology that did not mention
AUTHENTICATE
- Remove XCOMPOSE in favor of CATENATE+IMAPURL (RFC2192bis
extension)
- Incorporate [IMAP-DISC] by reference for state-sync best
practices
- Incorporate changes in latest XZIP, XENCRYPTED, XCONVERT,
XVFOLDER, and HTTP Binding drafts
- Add [WITHIN] reference
- More text discussing key exchange mechanisms for XENCRYPT
and notification encryption
- Remove XFILTER
- Updated References
Updates for Release 11
- Mobile Repository concept altered to be a VFOLDER
- Updates to XCONVERT syntax to track lemonade
- Removal of XFILTER
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 57]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
Updates for Release 10
- Correction in section 5.3.5 regarding the message literals
introduced
- Correction of the description of the first example.
Updates for Release 09
- Section 1.3: Clarification that UIDs are the same across
repositories.
- Section 3.1: Addition of mention of SIEVE and outband filter
management
- Remove section 5.1.1. on MONOINCUID as it tunr sout not to be
needed.
- Section 5.3.4: Updates to add support for block encryption to
follow the changes in draft-maes-lemonade-lzip-02 with respect to
draft-maes-lemonade-lzip-01.
- Section 5.3.14: Addition of details on folder manipulation.
- Appendix A: Updates to follow the changes in draft-maes-lemonade-
http-binding-02 with respect to draft-maes-lemonade-http-binding-
01:
- Clarification of binding and motivations
- Editorial updates and corrections
- Section 5.3.5
- Updated based on comments received on Lemonade mailing list and
from Sun and to follow the changes in draft-maes-lemonade-ldeliver-01
with respect to draft-maes-lemonade-ldeliver-00.
- New command LCOMPOSE
- Updated command LDELIVER
- Updated references
- Updates future work
Updates for Release 08
- Updates to follow the changes in draft-maes-lemonade-lconvert-01
with respect to draft-maes-lemonade-lconvert-00.
- Updates to follow the changes in draft-maes-lemonade-lzip-01 with
respect to draft-maes-lemonade-lzip-00.
- Updates to follow the changes in draft-maes-lemonade-monoincuid-01
with respect to draft-maes-lemonade-monoincuid-00.
- Editorial fixes
- Author updates
- Clarification of P-IMAP session in section 1.2.3.
Updates for Release 07
- Section 1.2.3: Editorial updates and qualification of SID as a
random number.
- Section 1.3: Editorial updates.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 58]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
- Section 1.4:
- Editorial updates
- Addition of edits of messages parts and IMAP URL
- Additional motivation of XDELIVER
- Additional details on server driven and client request
conversions and adaptation
- Re-introducing PIM as supported data objects.
- Section 2: Updates of the relationship between P-IMAP and
[LEMONADEPROFILE].
- Section 3.1: Update of login details.
- Section 3.1.1: Update on session validity.
- Section 3.2.2: Editorial updates
- Section 3.2.3: Addition of [GSMSMS] and [WAPWDP].
- Section 3.4: Update of the explanation on opening a new session and
support of multiple folders
- Section 5.1.1: Addition of monotonically increasing UID and
MONOINCUID CAPABILITY feature.
- Section 5.1.3: Correction of client versus server and addition of
the declaration of compliance to a P-IMAP revision.
- Section 5.1.4: Update / clarification of the login details
consistent with updates in section 3.1 and SID consistent with
updates in section 1.2.3.
- New section 5.2 on registering with the server by splitting pas
section 5.1.6.
- Section 5.3.1: deprecation of explicit UDP port num and host num
address and introduction of NOTIFICATION ADDRESS and PORT.
- Section 5.3.2: Editorial updates and addition of support for
[GSMSMS] and [WAPWDP].
- Section 5.3.3: Editorial updates.
- Section 5.3.4: Support for XZIP with XDELIVER.
- Section 5.3.5:
- Clarification of text / attachment append
- Additional support of IMAP-URL.
- Manipulation of address field.
- Update XDELIVER to address issues with respect to what would be
expected based on SMTP (add ENVELOP parameter).
- New section 5.3.6 on IMAP-URL.
- New section 5.3.7 on SMTP and [LEMONADEPROFILE] forward without
download mechanisms and add details on XDELIVER.
- Section 5.3.8:
- Addition of mechanisms to support of document based on [OMA-
STI].
- Mechanism to request DEFAULT conversion.
- New section 6 on P-IMAP:
- Client security
- Client updates
- Client-side behavior
- Minimum binding interoperability requirements
- Update of Security section.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 59]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
- Updates of Reference section.
- Appendix A: updates of usage of HTTP / HTTPS binding.
- Appendix B.2: editorial updates
- New Appendix B.3 on usage of [GSMSMS] and [WAPWDP].
- New appendix E.3 on using [OMA-STI] for transcoding with XCONVERT
and XUIDCONVERT.
- Clarification of future work item [2] and addition of item [8].
- Corrections of authors names.
Updates for Release 06
[1] Update of the author list
[2] Section 1.4: Update of the details on attachment conversion
and PIM
[3] Section 2: Clarification of positioning with respect to other
e-mail specifications
[4] Editorial improvement of section 3.1.2.
[5] Improvement of explanations in section 3.2.
[6] New section with recommendations on the connectivity model
[7] Removal of sections 4.2 and 4.3 on Folder events and PIM
events.
[2] Editorial improvement in section 5.
[3] Section 5.1.3. The Capability command can now return XPIMAPv1.
[4] Section 5.1.4: Supplying an Email Domain is no longer optional
during login to a PIMAP session. Addition of the notion of
SESSIONID. Removal of the constrain on 10 digits for phone
numbers.
[5] Section 5.1.6: Additional details on how keys are selected,
exchanged, updated and used for encryption of out-of-band
notifications and in-band messages.
[6] Section 5.2.1: Additional details on XPROVISION of encryption
key and UDP notification details when supported. Other
information included also such as XFILTER's available.
[7] Section 5.2.2: Addition of support for richer out-of-band
notification formats than simply [EMN]. Also, allows user to set
the active view and notification filters, as well as the active
event filter. Add explicitly UDP as an out-of-band notification
mechanism.
[8] Section 5.2.3: Changes in XFilter usage and syntax. Now
XFilter is used to name and describe a set of criteria for a
filter. The active view and notification filters are now set
with XSETPIMAPPREF.
[9] Section 5.2.5: Now, there is only an XDELIVER command, but no
UID XDELIVER command. XDELIVER requires both a uid validity and
uid for a message to be forwarded or replied.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 60]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
[10] Section 5.2.8: Extension of XCONVERT. XCONVERT has been
extended to allow the client to alter the server's character set
encoding, as well as the transfer encoding (compression). Namely,
XCONVERT now provides the ability to request a character set
conversion, which may or may not be honored. If it is not
honored, default is either the original encoding, or UTF-8.
Principally, if the message part the client is requesting
conversion of is text, it may attempt to convert it from US-
ASCII, ISO-8859, UTF-8, UCS-2/UCS-4, etc to compatible encodings.
Also, the client may request a transfer encoding from base64,
quoted-printable, or 8-bit clean. Converting from say, base-64 to
8-bit, may result is a savings of up to 33% before compression.
Addition also of the details on how device information obtained
outside P-IMAP is expected to be used.
[11] Section 5.2.7: Correction of some typos
[12] Security Considerations: Indications that server tools are
out of scope of P-IMAP.
[13] Update of references
[14] Update of section A.1 according to section 3.3.
[15] Update of section A.3 to qualify problem raised by
intermediaries.
[16] Section B.2 extensions of the out-of-band notification format
to beyond [EMN].
[17] Update of Future Work.
[18] Update of version history.
[19] Update of Authors Addresses.
Updates for Release 05
[1] Abstract update to explicitly call out the objective of
network transport neutrality
[2] Section 1.2: Add explicitly that the clients changes are
transmitted to the server.
[3] Section 1.2.1: Clarifies when new session and State-based-
comparison synchronization is used.
[4] Added section 1.2.3.
[5] Clarification by renaming in section 1.3 and after
notification / priority filter as notification filter only.
[6] Section 1.4: removed explicit duration before logging out the
client + editorial improvements
[7] Section 2: removed explicit assumption that P-IMAP is the
mobile profile of Lemonade. This is still to be determined.
[8] Section 3.1: Editorial improvement by removing unnecessary
implementation specific sentence on amount of session supported
per user and device.
[9] Section 3.1.2: Clarification of the explanation of
notification filter.
[10] Section 3.1.3: Clarification of the explanation of event
filter.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 61]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
[11] Section 3.2.3: Added SIP notification as a possible out-of-
band notification mechanism.
[12] Section 3.3: Editorial changes and removal of exact time
amount before session expiration.
[13] Section 4.3: Added a clarification on how PIM events can be
supported.
[14] Section 5.1.6: Added detail on key exchange via XPROVISION
and recommendation not to use XENCRYPTED when STARTTLS is used
(and when proxies are not used or an issue).
[15] Section 5.2.2: Added support for SIP notifications.
[16] Section 5.2.4: Remove mandate to use gzip if STARTTLS is
used.
[17] Section 5.2.6: Add consideration on using XCONVERT to
compress or encrypt.
[18] Security considerations: Add spam as an issue.
[19] Added [CONNECT] to references
[20] Update example syntax for chunked encoding versus long live.
[21] Appendix A.3: Add caveat when using HTTP long live sessions.
[22] Appendix B.1: Clarification of the explanations
[23] Appendix B.2: Clarification of the explanations
[24] Added Appendix E.2.
[25] Additional future work items ([5] and [6])
[26] Updates for Release 05
[27] Update of authors
Updates for Release 04
[1] Section 5.1.1. - Made the UID change condition SHOULD to be
consistent with IMAP.
{2} Appendix A.2 added to discuss choosing between HTTPS and HTTP.
Updates for Release 03
[1] Throughout this document - editorial fixes.
[2] Section 1.1: Additional positioning of pull / poll model
versus push model.
[3] Clarification in section 1.2 of the reaction of P-IMAP clients
to events.
[4] Clarifications of sections 1.2.1, 1.2.2 and 1.3.
[5] Addition of details about the "attachments forward/reply
behavior".
[6] Section 2 has been added to position P-IMAP and the Lemonade
Pull Model described in [LEMONADEPROFILE].
[7] Throughout the document - Terminology change to
prioritization/notification filter.
[8] Section 3.1 - Reorganization of the text for clarification.
[9] Section 3.2.3 - Additional motivation for using out-of-band
notification
[10] Change of title for section 4.1
[11] Section 5.1.1 - Change of normative statement from SHOULD to
MUST, back to SHOULD
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 62]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
[12] Clarifications in section 5.1.3 and 5.1.5.
[13] Section 5.2.3 - Extension of the type of out-of-band
notification channels.
[14] Section 5.2.3 - Fixes of examples: Changes of N to P.
[15] Section 5.2.4 - Clarification of XZIP normative statements
depending on the selected binding for P-IMAP.
[16] Mention of HTTPS under security considerations
[17] Reference updates to reflect [LEMONADEPROFILE].
[18] Appendix A.1 - Fixes of some HTTP/HTTPS Request/Response
Formats.
[19] Updates to release history (Release 03)
[20] Updates of authors
[21] Additions of sections on Intellectual Property Statement and
Full Copyright Statement
Updates for Release 02
[1] Throughout this document - took out references to mailbox
since its definition was ambiguous. Now, the terms folder, email
account, and repository are used instead.
[2] Section 1.2.2 - took out message events, which is now
described in new section 3.
[3] Section 1.4 - removed attachments behavior
[4] Section 3 - new section containing event payloads
[5] Old section 3.1.3 - removed this section on forwarded flags
[6] Old section 3.1.4 - added resync, folder, and session
untagged response syntax
[7] Old section 3.1.5 - UID becomes should instead of must
requirement
[8] Old section 3.1.7 - took out resync, which is now in login
section
[9] New section 4.1.6 - a new section concerning untagged
XENCRYPTED responses in place of untagged FETCH responses.
[10] Old 3.2.1 - XPROVISION now just returns what XFILTERS are
supported and what values some PIMAP Prefs can take on
[11] Old 3.2.2
[a] Took out PIMAP_OUTBAND_NEW_FORMAT
[b] Added in PIMAP_INBAND_PUSH format
[c] valid values for some preferences are given in XPROVISION
[d] XGETPIMAPPREF -> XGETPIMAPPREFS
[e] defined XGETPIMAPPREFS untagged response
[12] Old 3.2.3 - defined XFILTER untagged response
[13] Old 3.2.4 - dropped this section on XTERSE
[14] Old 3.2.6 - changed syntax so only V & N can be given for
get.
[15] Old 3.2.7
[a] XUIDCONVERT -> UID CONVERT
[b] added untagged response syntax
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 63]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
[16] Security Considerations section - added in that there are
additional security considerations when the server is implemented
through a proxy on a distrusted operator network.
[17] Appendix B.2 - changed example where client gets events in
response to a login command (instead of noop)
[18] Appendix C - new appendix to cover security issues for
proxy-based deployments of P-IMAP.
[19] Appendix E.2 on further considerations, which are things to
add in the upcoming releases.
Updates for Release pre-01
[1] Sections 1.1, 1.3, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, and 2.2.3
Added diagrams to better explain P-IMAP concepts
[2] Section 1.4
[a] Point 1 - changed term definition to Compression
[b] Added points 5 and 6 regarding Attachment Handling
[3] Section 3.1.4
Updated minimal P-IMAP server requirements
[4] Section 3.1.5
[a] Fixed the title - P-IMAP Session/Login
[b] Added examples for "First Login" and "Login after Logout"
[c] Added Section 3.1.7
[d] RESYNC untagged response when missed notifications occur
[5] Section 3.2.2
[a] XSETPREF and XGETPREF -> XSETPIMAPPREF and XGETPIMAPPREF
[b] Reduced the number of preference parameters
[6] Section 3.2.3
Added a Days Before Today filter
[7] Removed section 4
[8] References
[a] Added references to IMAP-DISC and RFC 2180
[b] Removed references to MIMAP, NSMS
[9] Appendix B
[a] added example of out-of-band notification
[b] explained client behavior in response to notifications
[10] Old Appendix C
Removed completely, as attachment conversion is described in
XCONVERT command and ways of retrieving it are discussed in RFC
2683
[11] New Appendix C
Appendix C now features security considerations for proxy-based
implementations of P-IMAP.
Release 00
Initial release published on Feb. 8th 2004
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 64]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
Acknowledgments
The authors want to thank all who have contributed key insight and
extensively reviewed several versions of the P-IMAP concepts and
early P-IMAP specifications.
Special thanks to authors of past versions including Vida Ha.
A special thanks is addressed to several employees of Nokia and
Openwave.
A special thanks to editors and reviewers of some of the derived
drafts whose input was reflected back in the P-IMAP draft including
especially D. Cridland, N. Mitra (Ericsson), A. Melnikov (Isode), C.
Newman (Sun), M. Pozefsky (IBM), A. Srivastava (Sun).
Authors Addresses
Stephane H. Maes
Oracle Corporation
500 Oracle Parkway
M/S 4op634
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
USA
Phone: +1-650-607-6296
Email: stephane.maes@oracle.com
Rafiul Ahad
Oracle Corporation
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
USA
Eugene Chiu
Oracle Corporation
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
USA
Ray Cromwell
Oracle Corporation
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
USA
Jia-der Day
Oracle Corporation
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
USA
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 65]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
Wook-Hyun Jeong
Samsung Electronics,CO., LTD
416, Maetan-3dong, Yeongtong-gu,
Suwon-city, Gyeonggi-do,
Korea 442-600
Tel: +82-31-279-8289
E-mail: wh75.jeong@samsung.com
Chang Kuang
Oracle Corporation
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
USA
Rodrigo Lima
Oracle Corporation
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
USA
Gustaf Rosell
Sony Ericsson
P.O. Box 64
SE-164 94 Kista,
Sweden
Tel: +46 8 508 780 00
Jean Sini
6480 Via Del Oro
San Jose, CA 95119
USA
Sung-Mu Son
LG Electronics
Mobile Communication Technology Research Lab.
Tel: +82-31-450-1910
E-Mail: sungmus@lge.com
Fan Xiaohui
Product Development Division
R&D CENTER
CHINA MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION (CMCC)
ADD: 53A, Xibianmennei Ave.,Xuanwu District,
Beijing,100053
China
TEL:+86 10 66006688 EXT 3137
Zhao Lijun
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 66]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
CMCC R&D
ADD: 53A, Xibianmennei Ave.,Xuanwu District,
Beijing,100053
China
TEL:.8610
.66006688.3041
Dwayne Bennett
Consilient
P.O. Box 2172
St. John's, NL A1C 6E6
Canada
Tel: +1 709 576 1706
E-mail: bennett@consilient.com
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 67]
<Push-IMAP> March 2006
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Maes Expires September 2006 [Page 68]
Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129c, available from
https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/