[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02

Network Working Group                                           K. Naito
Internet-Draft                                              A. Matsumoto
Intended status: Standards Track                                     NTT
Expires: January 10, 2013                                   July 9, 2012


                        NAT TIME_WAIT reduction
            draft-naito-nat-resource-optimizing-extension-02

Abstract

   When network address translation (NAT) is used in an address resource
   restricted environment, or when a lot of users are located under a
   NAT device, IP addresses and port resources may be eaten up, and this
   affects user experiences very negatively.  This situation can be
   greatly mitigated by tweaking mapping behavior and session timer
   handling in NAT functions.  This document proposes extension for
   optimizing NAT IP address and port resources in address resource
   restricted environments.  The extension makes use of TCP timestamps
   and sequence numbers for TIME_WAIT assassination.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on January 10, 2013.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect



Naito & Matsumoto       Expires January 10, 2013                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft           NAT TIME_WAIT reduction               July 2012


   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

   This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
   Contributions published or made publicly available before November
   10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
   material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
   modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
   Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
   the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
   outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
   not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
   it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
   than English.


1.  Introduction

   After IPv4 addresses run out, IPv4 address resources will be further
   restricted site-by-site.  If global IPv4 address are shared between
   several clients, assignable port resources at each client will be
   limited.

   NAT is a tool that is widely used to deal with this IPv4 address
   shortage problem.  However, the demand for resources to provide
   Internet access to users and devices will continue to increase.  IPv6
   is a fundamental solution to this problem, but the deployment of IPv6
   will take time.

   In some cases, e.g. browsing a dynamic web page for a map service, a
   lot of sessions are used by the browser, and a number of ports are
   eaten up in a short time.  What is worse is that when a NAT is
   between a PC and a server, TIME_WAIT state of each TCP connection is
   kept for certain period, typically for four minutes, which consumes
   port resources.  Therefore, new connections cannot be established.

   This problem is caused or worsened by the following behavior.

      TIME_WAIT state assigned for a TCP connection remains active for
      2MSL after the last ACK to the last FIN is transferred.

   We propose mechanisms to change the above behavior that make it
   possible to save addresses and ports resources.






Naito & Matsumoto       Expires January 10, 2013                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft           NAT TIME_WAIT reduction               July 2012


1.1.   TCP TIME_WAIT

   The TCP TIME_WAIT state is described in RFC793 [RFC0793].  The TCP
   TIME_WAIT state needs to be kept for 2MSL before a connection is
   CLOSED, for the reasons below.

   1: In the event that packets from a session are delayed in the in-
      between network, and delivered to the end relatively later, we
      should prevent the packets from being transferred and interpreted
      as a packet that belongs to a new session.
   2: If the remote TCP has not received the acknowledgment of its
      connection termination request, it will re-send the FIN packet
      several times.

   These points are important for the TCP to work without problems.

1.2.   TIME_WAIT Assassination

   A TCP server MAY accept a TCP SYN for the 5-tuple session that is
   just finished and marked as TIME_WAIT state,as far as the TCP
   sequence number is increased.  This is known as TIME-WAIT
   assassination.  It should also be noted that some assassination
   hazards are described in RFC1337 [RFC1337].

1.3.   Protect Against Wrapped Sequence numbers (PAWS)

   The TCP sequence number wraps frequently especially in a high
   bandwidth session.  PAWS is used to prevent old duplicate packets
   that occurred in a previous session from being transferred to the new
   session whose valid TCP sequence numbers happen to overlap with the
   old duplicate packets.  This is implemented by introducing TCP
   timestamp option, and checking the timestamp option value of each
   packet.  PAWS is described in RFC1323 [RFC1323].


2.   NAT resource optimizing extension proposal

2.1.   Apply RFC6191 to NAT

   RFC 6191 [RFC6191] defines a mechanism for reducing the TIME_WAIT
   state using TCP timestamps and sequence numbers.  This document
   proposes to apply this RFC6191 [RFC6191] mechanism at NAT.  By
   tracing timestamp and sequence number values in NAT that manages
   states of traversing TCP sessions, a TIME_WAIT remaining wait-time
   can be reduced to zero, when a TCP-SYN packet carrying a larger
   timestamp or sequence number value arrives.  In this case, PAWS works
   to discard old duplicate packets at NAT.  A packet can be discarded
   as an old duplicate if it is received with a timestamp or sequence



Naito & Matsumoto       Expires January 10, 2013                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft           NAT TIME_WAIT reduction               July 2012


   number value less than a value recently received on the connection.
   When there are several clients with nonsuccessive timestamp or
   sequence number values are connected to a NAT device (i.e. not
   monotonically increasing among clients), it prevents some clients
   from getting a port to start a connection for a long time because
   other clients with larger timestamp or sequence number values are
   preferred.  Two workarounds for this issue are described below.

2.1.1.   Rewrite timestamp and sequence number values at NAT

   Rewrite timestamp and sequence number values of outgoings packets at
   NAT to be monotonically increasing.

2.1.2.   Split an assignable number of port space to each client

   Set some rules among clients connecting to NAT, e.g., split
   assignable ports between clients.  This MAY be done by distributing
   rules to clients via NAT equipment.


3.  Security Considerations

   Security issues are not discussed in this memo.


4.  Normative References

   [RFC0793]  Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7,
              RFC 793, September 1981.

   [RFC1323]  Jacobson, V., Braden, B., and D. Borman, "TCP Extensions
              for High Performance", RFC 1323, May 1992.

   [RFC1337]  Braden, B., "TIME-WAIT Assassination Hazards in TCP",
              RFC 1337, May 1992.

   [RFC6191]  Gont, F., "Reducing the TIME-WAIT State Using TCP
              Timestamps", BCP 159, RFC 6191, April 2011.













Naito & Matsumoto       Expires January 10, 2013                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft           NAT TIME_WAIT reduction               July 2012


Authors' Addresses

   Kengo Naito
   NTT NT Lab
   3-9-11 Midori-Cho
   Musashino-shi, Tokyo  180-8585
   Japan

   Phone: +81 422 59 4949
   Email: naito.kengo@lab.ntt.co.jp


   Arifumi Matsumoto
   NTT NT Lab
   3-9-11 Midori-Cho
   Musashino-shi, Tokyo  180-8585
   Japan

   Phone: +81 422 59 3334
   Email: arifumi@nttv6.net































Naito & Matsumoto       Expires January 10, 2013                [Page 5]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129c, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/