[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [Email] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 RFC 2851

Internet-Draft              Endpoint MIB            August 1999
Expires February, 2000

                            Internet Endpoint MIB


1. Status of this Memo

     This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance
     with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.

     Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
     Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
     other groups may also distribute working documents as

     Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
     months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
     documents at any time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-
     Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as
     "work in progress."

     The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at^M

     The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at

2. Abstract

   This MIB module defines constructs to represent commonly used
   addressing information.  The intent is that these definitions
   will be imported and used in the various MIBs that would otherwise
   define their own representations.  This work is output from the
   Operations and Management Area "IPv6MIB" design team.

3. Definitions



   LAST-UPDATED "9907300000Z"
   CONTACT-INFO "Send comments to mibs@ops.ietf.org"
        "A MIB module for Internet address definitions."
   ::= { TBD }

-- New TCs for representing generic Internet endpoints.
-- These are roughly equivalent to TDomain and TAddress...

-- Internet endpoints types
    STATUS       current
          "A value that represents a type of Internet endpoint.

           Note that it is possible to sub-type objects defined with
           this syntax by removing one or more enumerated values.
           The DESCRIPTION clause of such objects (or their corresponding
           InetEndpoint object) must document specific usage."

    STATUS       current
          "Denotes an generic Internet endpoint.

          A InetEndpoint value is always interpreted within the context of a
          InetEndpointType value.  Thus, each definition of a InetEndpointType
          value must be accompanied by a definition of a textual convention
          for use with that InetEndpointType.

          When this Textual Convention is used as the syntax of an index object,
          there may be issues with the limit of 128 sub-identifiers specified
          in [SMIv2].  In this case, it is recommended that the OBJECT-TYPE
          declaration include a "SIZE" clause to limit the number of potential
          instance sub-identifiers.
    REFERENCE "See the TAddress TC in std58."
    SYNTAX       OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..255))

-- TCs for specific Internet endpoint values.

-- IPv4 Address

    DISPLAY-HINT "1d.1d.1d.1d"
    STATUS       current
            "Represents an IPv4 network address:

               octets   contents        encoding
                1-4     IP address      network-byte order

             The corresponding InetEndpointType is ipv4(1)."

-- IPv6 Address

    DISPLAY-HINT "2x:2x:2x:2x:2x:2x:2x:2x"
    STATUS       current
            "Represents an IPv6 network address:

                octets   contents        encoding
                 1-16    IPv6 address    network-byte order

             The corresponding InetEndpointType is ipv6(2)."
     REFERENCE "See the Ipv6Address TC in RFC 2465."
     SYNTAX       OCTET STRING (SIZE (16))

-- DNS Name

    DISPLAY-HINT "255a"
    STATUS       current
            "Represents a fully qualified DNS host name.
             The corresponding InetEndpointType is dns(3).

             The DESCRIPTION clause of InetEndpoint objects that
             may have InetEndpointDNS values must fully describe
             how (and when) such names are to be resolved to IP
     REFERENCE "RFCs 952 and 1123."
     SYNTAX       OCTET STRING (SIZE (1..255))


4. Usage

    These definitions provide a mechanism to define generic
    Internet-accessible endpoints within MIB specifications.
    It is recommended that MIB developers use these definitions
    when applicable, as opposed to defining their own constructs.

    A generic Internet endpoint consists of two objects,
    one whose syntax is InetEndpointType, and another whose
    syntax is InetEndpoint.  The value of the first object
    determines how the value of the second object is encoded.

    One particular usage of InetEndpointType/InetEndpoint pairs
    is to avoid over-constraining an object definition by the
    use of the IpAddress syntax.  IpAddress limits an implementation
    to using IPv4 addresses only, and as such should only be used
    when the object truly is IPv4-specific.

5. Indexing

    When a generic Internet endpoint is used as an index, both
    the InetEndpointType and InetEndpoint objects must be used, and
    the InetEndpointType object must come first in the INDEX clause.

    Instance subidentifiers are then of the form T.N.O1.O2...On,
    where T is the value of the InetEndpointType object, O1...On
    are the octets in the InetEndpoint object, and N is the number
    of those octets.

    There is a meaningful lexicographical ordering to tables indexed
    in this fashion.  Command generator applications may

        o lookup specific endpoints of known type and value
        o issue GetNext requests for endpoints of a single type
        o issue GetNext requests for specific type and address prefix

    It should be pointed out that another valid approach is to
    define separate tables for different address types.  For example,
    one table might be indexed by an IpAddress object, and the other
    table indexed by an Ipv6Address object.  This is a decision for the
    MIB designer.  (For example, the tcpConnTable was left intact and a new
    table added for TCP connections over IPv6, see RFC 2452.)

6. Uniqueness of Addresses

    IPv4 addresses were intended to be globally unique, current
    usage notwithstanding.  IPv6 addresses were architected to
    have different scopes and hence uniqueness.  In particular,
    IPv6 "link-local" and "site-local" addresses are not guaranteed
    to be unique on any particular node.  In such cases, the duplicate
    addresses must be configured on different interfaces, so the combination
    of IPv6 address/interface is unique.

    For tables indexed by InetEndpointType/InetEndpoint pairs, where
    there may be non-unique instances of InetEndpointIPv6, the recommended
    approach is to add a third index object to ensure uniqueness.

    It is recommended that the syntax of this third index object be
    InterfaceIndexOrZero, from IF-MIB.  The value of this object
    should be 0 when the value of the InetEndpointType object is
    not ipv6(2).

    << TBD: what about Ipv6IfIndexOrZero in RFC 2465? >>

7. Multiple InetEndpoints per Host

    Note that a single host system may be configured with multiple
    addresses (IPv4 or IPv6), and possibly with multiple DNS names.
    Thus it is possible for a single host system to be represented
    by multiple (unique) InetEndpointType/InetEndpoint pairs.

    If this could be an implementation or usage issue the DESCRIPTION
    clause of the relevant objects should fully describe required

8. Resolving DNS Names

    DNS names are translated to IP addresses when communication with
    a host is required.  This raises a temporal aspect to defining MIB
    objects whose value is a DNS name; when is the name translated to
    an address?

    For example, consider an object defined to indicate a forwarding
    destination, and whose value is a DNS name.  When does the
    forwarding entity resolve the DNS name?  Each time forwarding occurs?
    Once, when the object was instantiated?

    The DESCRIPTION clause of such objects should precisely define
    how (when) any required name to address resolution is done.

9. Usage Examples

    Example 1:

        fooTable OBJECT-TYPE
                SYNTAX      SEQUENCE OF FooEntry
                MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
                STATUS      current
                "The foo table."
                ::= { bar 1 }

        fooEntry OBJECT-TYPE
                SYNTAX      FooEntry
                MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
                STATUS      current
                "A foo entry."
                INDEX      { fooPartnerType, fooPartner }
                ::= { fooTable 1 }

        FooEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
                fooPartnerType  InetEndpointType,
                fooPartner      InetEndpoint,
                fooStatus       INTEGER,
                fooDescr        OCTET STRING

        fooPartnerType ::= OBJECT-TYPE
                SYNTAX      InetEndpointType
                MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
                STATUS      current
                "The type of Internet endpoint by which the partner is reachable."
                ::= { fooEntry 1 }

        fooPartner ::= OBJECT-TYPE
                SYNTAX      InetEndpoint (SIZE (0..64))
                MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
                STATUS      current
                "The Internet endpoint for the partner.  Note that implementations
                 must limit themselves to a single entry in this table per reachable
                 partner.  Also, if an Ipv6 endpoint is used, it must contain a globally
                 unique IPv6 address."
                ::= { fooEntry 2 }

    Example 2:

        sysAddrTable OBJECT-TYPE
                SYNTAX      SEQUENCE OF SysAddrEntry
                MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
                STATUS      current
                "The sysAddr table."
                ::= { sysAddr 1 }

        sysAddrEntry OBJECT-TYPE
                SYNTAX      SysAddrEntry
                MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
                STATUS      current
                "A sysAddr entry."
                INDEX      { sysAddrType, sysAddr, sysAddrIfIndex }
                ::= { sysAddrTable 1 }

        SysAddrEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
                sysAddrPartnerType      InetEndpointType,
                sysAddrPartner          InetEndpoint,
                sysAddrIfIndex          InterfaceIndexOrZero,
                sysAddrStatus           INTEGER,
                sysAddrDescr            OCTET STRING

        sysAddrType ::= OBJECT-TYPE
                SYNTAX      InetEndpointType {
                MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
                STATUS      current
                "The type of system address."
                ::= { sysAddrEntry 1 }

        sysAddr ::= OBJECT-TYPE
                SYNTAX      InetEndpoint (SIZE (4 | 16))
                MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
                STATUS      current
                "The system address."
                ::= { sysAddrEntry 2 }

        sysAddrIfIndex ::= OBJECT-TYPE
                SYNTAX     InterfaceIndexOrZero
                MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
                STATUS      current
                "The system address interface.  This object is used to disambiguate
                 duplicate system IPv6 addresses, and should be 0 for non-duplicate
                ::= { sysAddrEntry 3 }

10. References


11. Copyright


12. Authors

    This work was done by the IETF Ops Area "IPv6MIB" Design Team.
    Comments should be posted to mibs@ops.ietf.org.


    This appendix lists the issues raised over common addressing
    MIB constructs, and the reasoning for the decisions made in
    this module.

    1. Efficient table lookups

       Some existing MIBs have tables of generic addresses, indexed
       by a random integer.  This makes it impossible to lookup
       specific addresses, or issue meaningful GetNext operations.

    2. Common addressing should be defined such that no SMI changes
       are required.

       For example, the use of the ASN.1 CHOICE would really be an SMI

    3. TCs and DISPLAY-HINTS

       A single object that contains both address type and value
       does not provide a way to express the display characteristics
       of each type.

       (Also, such a single object requires code changes to handle updates,
        whereas the solution chosen requires only MIB updates.)

    4. Document the possible non-uniqueness of IPv6 addresses, and the
       impact on indexing tables.

    5. TDomain/TAddress limited to transport services

       It was unclear if network layer addresses were appropriate
       for use in TAddress values, since std58 refers specifically to
       "transport addresses".

       This point is less important than std58's definition that
       TAddress values always be defined in the context of TDomain
       values.  Since did not want to index by OIDs, we did not
       use TDomain and hence cannot use TAddress.

    6. Harness the use of IpAddress

       Several standard-track MIBs have used IpAddress syntax
       inadvertently, needlessly limiting implementations to IPv4.

       The specification under development should address this.

    7. DNS names in addition to addresses

       It is useful to be able to specify a system via a DNS name,
       so the common addressing mechanism should support them.

Expires February, 2000

Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.111, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/