[Docs] [txt|pdf|xml|html] [Tracker] [WG] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids

Distributed Mobility Management [dmm]                         C. Perkins
Internet-Draft                                                 Futurewei
Expires: April 30, 2015                                   V. Devarapalli
                                                         Vasona Networks
                                                        October 27, 2014


     MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283 Mobile Node Identifier Option
                   draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01.txt

Abstract

   Additional Identifier Types are proposed for use with the Mobile Node
   Identifier Option for MIPv6 (RFC 4283).

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on April 30, 2015.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.





Perkins & Devarapalli    Expires April 30, 2015                 [Page 1]


Internet-Draft      MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283        October 2014


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  New Mobile Node Identifier Types  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   5.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     5.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     5.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7

1.  Introduction

   The Mobile Node Identifier Option for MIPv6 [RFC4283] has proved to
   be a popular design tool for providing identifiers for mobile nodes
   during authentication procedures with AAA protocols such as Diameter
   [RFC3588].  To date, only a single type of identifier has been
   specified, namely the MN NAI.  Other types of identifiers are in
   common use, and even referenced in RFC 4283.  In this document, we
   propose adding some basic types that are commonly in use in various
   telecommunications standards, including the IMSI, P-TMSI, IMEI, GUTI,
   and IEEE MAC-layer addresses.  In addition, we include the IPv6
   address itself as a legitimate mobile node identifier.

2.  New Mobile Node Identifier Types

   The following types of identifiers are commonly used to identify
   mobile nodes.  For each type, references are provided with full
   details on the format of the type of identifer.

   EPC supports several encoding systems or schemes including

   o  RFID-GID (Global Identifier),
   o  RFID-SGTIN (Serialized Global Trade Item Number),
   o  RFID-SSCC (Serial Shipping Container),
   o  RFID-GLN (Global Location Number),
   o  RFID-GRAI (Global Returnable Asset Identifier),
   o  RFID-DOD (Department of Defense) and
   o  RFID-GIAI (Global Individual Asset Identifier).

   For each RFID scheme except GID, there are two variations: a 64-bit
   scheme (for example, GLN-64) and a 96-bit scheme (GLN-96).  GID has
   only a 96-bit scheme.  Within each scheme, an EPC identifier can be
   represented in a binary form or other forms such as URI.

   The following list includes the above RFID types as well as various
   other common identifiers and several different types of DUIDs.




Perkins & Devarapalli    Expires April 30, 2015                 [Page 2]


Internet-Draft      MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283        October 2014


   o  IPv6 Address [RFC2373]
   o  IMSI [ThreeGPP-IDS]
   o  P-TMSI [ThreeGPP-IDS]
   o  GUTI [ThreeGPP-IDS]
   o  EUI-48 address [IEEE802]
   o  EUI-64 address [IEEE802]
   o  DUID-LLT [RFC3315]
   o  DUID-EN [RFC3315]
   o  DUID-LL [RFC3315]
   o  DUID-UUID [RFC6355]
   o  12-15 reserved
   o  16 reserved
   o  RFID-SGTIN-64 [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  RFID-SSCC-64 [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  RFID-GLN-64 [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  RFID-GRAI-64 [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  RFID-DOD-64 [RFID-DoD-96]
   o  RFID-GIAI-64 [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  23 reserved
   o  RFID-GID-96 [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  RFID-SGTIN-96 [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  RFID-SSCC-96 [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  RFID-GLN-96 [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  RFID-GRAI-96 [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  RFID-DOD-96 [RFID-DoD-96]
   o  RFID-GIAI-96 [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  31 reserved
   o  RFID-GID-URI [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  RFID-SGTIN-URI [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  RFID-SSCC-URI [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  RFID-GLN-URI [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  RFID-GRAI-URI [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  RFID-DOD-URI [RFID-DoD-96]
   o  RFID-GIAI-URI [EPC-Tag-Data]
   o  39-255 reserved

3.  Security Considerations

   This document does not introduce any security mechanisms, and does
   not have any impact on existing security mechanisms.  Insofar as the
   selection of a security association may be dependent on the exact
   form of a mobile node identifier, additional specification may be
   necessary when the new identifier types are employed with the general
   AAA mechanisms for mobile node authorizations.

   Some identifiers (e.g., IMSI) are considered to be private
   information.  If used in the MNID extension as defined in this
   document, the packet including the MNID extension should be encrypted



Perkins & Devarapalli    Expires April 30, 2015                 [Page 3]


Internet-Draft      MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283        October 2014


   so that personal information or trackable identifiers would not be
   inadvertently disclosed to passive observers.  Moreover, MNIDs
   containing sensitive identifiers might only be used for signaling
   during initial network entry.  Subsequent binding update exchanges
   would then rely on a temporary identifier allocated during the
   initial network entry.

4.  IANA Considerations

   The new mobile node identifier types defined in the document should
   be assigned values from the "Mobile Node Identifier Option Subtypes"
   registry.  The following values should be assigned.







































Perkins & Devarapalli    Expires April 30, 2015                 [Page 4]


Internet-Draft      MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283        October 2014


                     New Mobile Node Identifier Types

               +-----------------+------------------------+
               | Identifier Type | Identifier Type Number |
               +-----------------+------------------------+
               | IPv6 Address    | 2                      |
               | IMSI            | 3                      |
               | P-TMSI          | 4                      |
               | EUI-48 address  | 5                      |
               | EUI-64 address  | 6                      |
               | GUTI            | 7                      |
               | DUID-LLT        | 8                      |
               | DUID-EN         | 9                      |
               | DUID-LL         | 10                     |
               | DUID-UUID       | 11                     |
               |                 | 12-15 reserved         |
               |                 | 16 reserved            |
               | RFID-SGTIN-64   | 17                     |
               | RFID-SSCC-64    | 18                     |
               | RFID-GLN-64     | 19                     |
               | RFID-GRAI-64    | 20                     |
               | RFID-DOD-64     | 21                     |
               | RFID-GIAI-64    | 22                     |
               |                 | 23 reserved            |
               | RFID-GID-96     | 24                     |
               | RFID-SGTIN-96   | 25                     |
               | RFID-SSCC-96    | 26                     |
               | RFID-GLN-96     | 27                     |
               | RFID-GRAI-96    | 28                     |
               | RFID-DOD-96     | 29                     |
               | RFID-GIAI-96    | 30                     |
               |                 | 31 reserved            |
               | RFID-GID-URI    | 32                     |
               | RFID-SGTIN-URI  | 33                     |
               | RFID-SSCC-URI   | 34                     |
               | RFID-GLN-URI    | 35                     |
               | RFID-GRAI-URI   | 36                     |
               | RFID-DOD-URI    | 37                     |
               | RFID-GIAI-URI   | 38                     |
               |                 | 39-255 reserved        |
               +-----------------+------------------------+

                                  Table 1

   See Section 2 for details about the identifer types.






Perkins & Devarapalli    Expires April 30, 2015                 [Page 5]


Internet-Draft      MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283        October 2014


5.  References

5.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2373]  Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
              Architecture", RFC 2373, July 1998.

   [RFC3315]  Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C.,
              and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for
              IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003.

   [RFC4122]  Leach, P., Mealling, M., and R. Salz, "A Universally
              Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace", RFC 4122, July
              2005.

   [RFC4283]  Patel, A., Leung, K., Khalil, M., Akhtar, H., and K.
              Chowdhury, "Mobile Node Identifier Option for Mobile IPv6
              (MIPv6)", RFC 4283, November 2005.

   [RFC4285]  Patel, A., Leung, K., Khalil, M., Akhtar, H., and K.
              Chowdhury, "Authentication Protocol for Mobile IPv6", RFC
              4285, January 2006.

   [RFC6355]  Narten, T. and J. Johnson, "Definition of the UUID-Based
              DHCPv6 Unique Identifier (DUID-UUID)", RFC 6355, August
              2011.

5.2.  Informative References

   [EPC-Tag-Data]
              EPCglobal Inc., , "EPC(TM) Generation 1 Tag Data Standards
              Version 1.1 Rev.1.27
              http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/kc/epcglobal/tds/
              tds_1_1_rev_1_27-standard-20050510.pdf", January 2005.

   [IEEE802]  IEEE, , "IEEE Std 802: IEEE Standards for Local and
              Metropolitan Networks: Overview and Architecture", 2001.

   [RFC3588]  Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J.
              Arkko, "Diameter Base Protocol", RFC 3588, September 2003.

   [RFID-DoD-96]
              Department of Defense, , "United States Department of
              Defense Suppliers Passive RFID Information Guide (Version
              15.0)", January 2010.






Perkins & Devarapalli    Expires April 30, 2015                 [Page 6]


Internet-Draft      MN Identifier Types for RFC 4283        October 2014


   [ThreeGPP-IDS]
              3rd Generation Partnership Project, , "3GPP Technical
              Specification 23.003 V8.4.0: Technical Specification Group
              Core Network and Terminals; Numbering, addressing and
              identification (Release 8)", March 2009.

Authors' Addresses

   Charles E. Perkins
   Futurewei Inc.
   2330 Central Expressway
   Santa Clara, CA  95050
   USA

   Phone: +1-408-330-4586
   Email: charliep@computer.org


   Vijay Devarapalli
   Vasona Networks
   2900 Lakeside Drive, Suite 180
   Santa Clara, CA 95054
   USA




























Perkins & Devarapalli    Expires April 30, 2015                 [Page 7]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.124, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/