[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: (draft-sattler-registry-domain-fee-report) 00 01 02 03

Internet Engineering Task Force                       T. Sattler, Editor
Internet-Draft
Intended status: Best Current Practice                         R. Carney
Expires: March 25, 2020                                     GoDaddy Inc.
                                                      September 26, 2019

                        Premium Domain Fee Report
               draft-sattler-premium-domain-fee-report-03

Abstract

   This document describes the content of a Premium Domain Fee Report
   based on the Report Structure and delivered by the Reporting
   Repository.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress".

   This Internet-Draft will expire on March 25, 2020.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Sattler & Carney          Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft           Premium Domain Fee Report        September 2019

Table of Contents
   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Terminology and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     2.1.  Internationalized Domain Names  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.2.  Dates and Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.3.  Character Encoding  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.4.  Currency  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Report Headings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  Fees  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   5.  Examples  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     5.1.  Single TLD File Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     5.2.  Multiple TLDs File Example  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     5.3.  Fee Change File Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   8.  Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   9.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     9.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     9.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   Appendix A.  Change History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     A.1.  Change from 00 to 01  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     A.2.  Change from 01 to 02  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     A.3.  Change from 02 to PREMIUMFEE 00   . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     A.4.  Change from PREMIUMFEE 00 to PREMIUMFEE 01  . . . . . . .   7
     A.5.  Change from PREMIUMFEE 01 to PREMIUMFEE 02  . . . . . . .   7
     A.6.  Change from PREMIUMFEE 02 to PREMIUMFEE 03  . . . . . . .   7
   Appendix B.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Authors' Addresses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7

1.  Introduction

   Modern top-level domain registries provide many detailed reports and
   documents that their registrars require on a daily, weekly and
   monthly basis. These most commonly include transaction reports, as
   well as lists containing currently unavailable domains and current
   premium domain fees. These reports are critical for registrars'
   businesses and play an important role in accounting and operations
   processes as well as in sales and marketing activities. In the
   current set-up, registrars must download these reports from each
   registry's intranet differently according to each registry's document
   management set up.

   This document describes the content of a Premium Domain Fee Report
   based on the [I-D.mcpherson-sattler-report-structure] and delivered
   by the [I-D.mcpherson-sattler-reporting-repository].

2.  Terminology and Definitions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] when
   specified in their uppercase forms.

Sattler & Carney          Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft           Premium Domain Fee Report        September 2019

2.1.  Internationalized Domain Names

   MUST be as defined in
   [I-D.mcpherson-sattler-report-structure].

2.2.  Dates and Times

   MUST be as defined in
   [I-D.mcpherson-sattler-report-structure].

2.3.  Character Encoding

   MUST be as defined in
   [I-D.mcpherson-sattler-report-structure].

2.4.  Currency

   MUST be as defined in
   [I-D.mcpherson-sattler-report-structure].

3.  Report Headings

   The first row MUST be the column headings in the following order:

   TLD               It MUST contain the top-level domain name and
                     formatted according to section 2.1 of this
                     document.

   DOMAIN            It MUST contain the domain name formatted according
                     to section 2.1 of this document.

   STATUS            It MUST contain the status of the domain name. It
                     MUST either be 'REGISTRY REGISTERED', 'REGISTERED',
                     'AVAILABLE', 'REGISTRY RESERVED' or 'POLICY
                     RESERVED'.

   DESCRIPTION       It MUST contain the descriptive name of the premium
                     tier to which the domain is allocated.

   CURRENCY          It MUST contain the currency of the following fees
                     according to section 2.4 of this document.

   CREATE            It MUST contain the fee for a domain create.

   RENEW             It MUST contain the fee for a domain renew.

   TRANSFER          It MUST contain the fee for a domain transfer.

   RESTORE           It MUST contain the fee for a domain restore.

   EFFECTIVE DATE    It MUST contain the date and time the fee listed
                     will go into effect and formatted according to
                     section 2.2 of this document.

Sattler & Carney          Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft           Premium Domain Fee Report        September 2019

4.  Fees

   Fees MUST either be whole numbers or rounded to two decimal places.
   The dividing point is a period (.).

5.  Examples

5.1.  Single TLD File Example

   This is an example of a domain fee report for a single top-level
   domain .example with non-standard fees.

   Filename: example_premium-domains_2018-11-01.csv.gz

   TLD,DOMAIN,STATUS,DESCRIPTION,CURRENCY,CREATE,RENEW,TRANSFER,RESTORE,
   EFFECTIVE DATE
   example,test1.example,REGISTRY RESERVED,A,USD,200,200,200,40,
   2018-11-08T00:00:00Z
   example,test2.example,POLICY RESERVED,DD,USD,75.50,75.50,75.50,40,
   2018-11-08T00:00:00Z
   example,test3.example,AVAILABLE,B,USD,10000,10000,10000,40,
   2018-12-01T00:00:00Z
   example,xn--4gqvdy3r.example,AVAILABLE,A,USD,50,50,50,40,
   2018-12-01T06:00:00Z

5.2.  Multiple TLDs File Example

   This is an example of a domain fee report for multiple top-level
   domains from example registry with non-standard fees.

   Filename: example-registry_premium-domains_2018-11.csv.gz

   TLD,DOMAIN,STATUS,DESCRIPTION,CURRENCY,CREATE,RENEW,TRANSFER,RESTORE,
   EFFECTIVE DATE
   example1,test1.example1,REGISTRY RESERVED,A,USD,200,200,200,40,
   2018-11-08T00:00:00Z
   example2,test1.example2,POLICY RESERVED,DD,USD,75.50,75.50,75.50,40,
   2018-11-08T00:00:00Z
   example3,test2.example3,AVAILABLE,B,USD,10000,10000,10000,40,
   2018-12-01T00:00:00Z
   xn--zckzah,xn--r8jz45g.xn--zckzah,AVAILABLE,A,USD,50,50,50,40,
   2018-12-01T06:00:00Z

Sattler & Carney          Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft           Premium Domain Fee Report        September 2019

5.3.  Fee Change File Example

   If the fee for a domain name is changing or moving to reserved or
   unreserved in the future, there MUST be two entries for the domain.

   One entry for the current fee and status of the name, this entry MUST
   be removed once the change takes place, and one entry for the future
   price of the domain name with its effective date.

   Example of a file that contains a future fee change for a single top-
   level domain .example.

   Filename: example_premium-domains_2018-11-01.csv.gz

   TLD,DOMAIN,STATUS,DESCRIPTION,CURRENCY,CREATE,RENEW,TRANSFER,RESTORE,
   EFFECTIVE DATE
   example,test1.example,REGISTRY RESERVED,A,USD,200,200,200,40,
   2018-11-01T00:00:00Z
   example,test1.example,REGISTRY RESERVED,DD,USD,75.50,75.50,75.50,40,
   2018-12-01T00:00:00Z

6.  IANA Considerations

   This document has no IANA actions.

7.  Security Considerations

   The Premium Domain Fee Report described in this document does not
   provide any security services.

8.  Implementation Status

   Note to RFC Editor: Please remove this section and the reference to
   [RFC7942] before publication.

   This section records the status of known implementations of the
   protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this
   Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in [RFC7942].
   The description of implementations in this section is intended to
   assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing drafts to
   RFCs.  Please note that the listing of any individual implementation
   here does not imply endorsement by the IETF.  Furthermore, no effort
   has been spent to verify the information presented here that was
   supplied by IETF contributors.  This is not intended as, and must not
   be construed to be, a catalog of available implementations or their
   features.  Readers are advised to note that other implementations may
   exist.

Sattler & Carney          Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft           Premium Domain Fee Report        September 2019

   According to [RFC7942], "this will allow reviewers and working groups
   to assign due consideration to documents that have the benefit of
   running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable experimentation
   and feedback that have made the implemented protocols more mature. It
   is up to the individual working groups to use this information as
   they see fit".

   Add implementation details once available.

9.  References

9.1.  Normative References

   [I-D.mcpherson-sattler-report-structure]
              McPherson, N. and Sattler, T., "Report Strucutre",
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcpherson-sattler-
              report-structure/> (work in progress), January 2019

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

9.2.  Informative References

   [I-D.mcpherson-sattler-reporting-repository]
              McPherson, N. and Sattler, T., "Reporting Repository",
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcpherson-sattler-
              reporting-repository/> (work in progress), January 2019

   [RFC7942]  Sheffer, Y. and Farrel, A., "Improving Awareness of
              Running Code: The Implementation Status Section", RFC
              7942, July 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7942>.

Sattler & Carney          Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 6]


Internet-Draft           Premium Domain Fee Report        September 2019

Appendix A.  Change History

A.1.  Change from 00 to 01

   Fixed minor typos. Clarified example file name in section 5.3.

A.2.  Change from 01 to 02

   Clarified the Period. Fixed numerous typos.

A.3.  Change from 02 to PREMIUMFEE 00

   Changed draft name. Added Roger Carney as additional author.

A.4.  Change from PREMIUMFEE 00 to PREMIUMFEE 01

   Editorial changes.

A.5.  Change from PREMIUMFEE 01 to PREMIUMFEE 02

   Editorial changes.

A.6.  Change from PREMIUMFEE 02 to PREMIUMFEE 03

   Editorial changes.

Appendix B.  Acknowledgements

   The authors wish to thank the following persons for their feedback
   and suggestions (sorted alphabetically by company):

   o Neal McPherson, 1&1 IONOS
   o James Galvin, Afilias
   o Jody Kolker, GoDaddy

Authors' Addresses

   Tobias Sattler

   Email: tobias.sattler@me.com
   URI:   https://tobiassattler.com

   Roger Carney
   GoDaddy Inc.
   14455 N. Hayden Rd. #219
   Scottsdale, AZ  85260
   US

   Email: rcarney@godaddy.com
   URI:   http://www.godaddy.com

Sattler & Carney          Expires March 25, 2020                [Page 7]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129d, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/