[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [Email] [Nits]
Versions: 00 01 02 03 04 05 08 09 10 11 12
draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase
Internet Engineering Task Force W. Tan
Internet-Draft Cloud Registry
Intended status: Experimental G. Brown
Expires: October 15, 2011 CentralNic Ltd
April 13, 2011
Launch Phase Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
draft-tan-epp-launchphase-00
Abstract
This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
extension mapping for the provisioning and management of domain names
during the launch phase of a domain name registry.
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 15, 2011.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Application Object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. <lp:phase> Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. <lp:status> Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2.1. State Transition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.3. Trademark Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. EPP Command Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1. EPP <check> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2. EPP <info> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2.1. Client Processing Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.2.2. Example <info> command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.3. EPP <create> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.3.1. Example <create> command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.3.2. Client Processing Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.4. EPP <update> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.4.1. Server Processing Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.4.2. Example <update> command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.5. EPP <delete> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.5.1. Server Processing Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.5.2. Example <delete> command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.6. EPP <renew> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.7. EPP <transfer> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
4. Formal Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
8. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
1. Introduction
This document describes an extension mapping for version 1.0 of the
Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) [RFC5730]. This EPP mapping
specifies a flexible schema that can be used to implement several
common use cases related to the provisioning and management of launch
phase extension in a domain name registry.
It is typical for domain registries to operate in a special mode
within a certain period of time to facilitate allocation of domain
names for a subset of the zone namespace that becomes available.
This document uses the term "launch phase" to refer to such a period.
The EPP domain name mapping [RFC5731] is designed for the steady
state operation of a registry. During a launch phase, however,
registries typically accept multiple applications for a given domain
name. This document proposes an extension to the domain name
extension in order to unambiguously manage the received applications.
1.1. Conventions Used in This Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
XML is case sensitive. Unless stated otherwise, XML specifications
and examples provided in this document MUST be interpreted in the
character case presented in order to develop a conforming
implementation.
"launchphase-1.0" is used as an abbreviation for
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:launchphase-1.0". The XML namespace prefix
"lp" is used, but implementations MUST NOT depend on it and instead
employ a proper namespace-aware XML parser and serializer to
interpret and output the XML documents.
2. Application Object
It is common for domain registries to allow multiple applications of
a given domain name during its launch phase operations.
Upon receiving a request to create a domain, the server creates an
application object corresponding to the request and assigns an
identifier for the application and returns it to the client. This
mapping defines an "application_id" element for this purpose.
In order to facilitate correlation, all subsequent operations on the
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
domain object MUST be qualified by the previously assigned
application_id.
To support common use cases of launch phase operations, this mapping
also defines several other elements that may be used in
implementations.
2.1. <lp:phase> Element
To allow for multiple launch phases, the application object MAY also
include an <lp:phase> element whose content is a server-defined
opaque identifier corresponding to each launch phase. Depending on
the policy of the domain registry, the phase may be implicit (based
on the time of request or encoded as part of the application_id) or
explicitly required.
2.2. <lp:status> Element
The <status> element is used to convey extended status(es) pertaining
to the application object, beyond what is specified in the object
mapping to which this application object represents.
The following status values are defiend:
pending the initial state of a newly-created application object.
validated the application meets relevant registry rules.
invalid the application does not validate according to registry rules
allocated one of two possible end states of an application object;
the object corresponding to the application has been
provisioned
cancelled the other possible end state; the object was not
provisioned
Certain status values MAY be combined. For example, an application
can be invalid and cancelled. [[Q1: Should we allow multiples?
--WT]]
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
2.2.1. State Transition
| request
v
+---------+
| pending |
+----+----+
|
|
+--------------+-----+-----------+--------------+
| | | |
v v v v
+-----------+ +---------+ +-------+ +-------+
| | | | / \ / \
| validated | | invalid +----->| cancelled | | allocated |
| | | | \ / \ /
+----+------+ +----+----+ +-------+ +-------+
| | ^ ^
| | | |
| +-----------------+ |
| | |
+---------------------------------+ |
| |
+------------------------------------------------+
Figure 1
2.3. Trademark Elements
Several optional trademark elements are defined:
o registered trademark
o registration number for the given trademark
o locality in which the trademark was registered
o capacity of the registrant in regards to the ownership or rights
to use the given trademark
o pre-verified code assigned by a third party verification service
to indicate trademark information that has been previously
validated.
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
3. EPP Command Mapping
This mapping is designed to be flexible, requiring only a minimum set
of required elements.
While it is meant to serve several use cases, it does not prescribe
any interpretation by the client or server. Such processing is
typically highly policy-dependent and therefore specific to
implementations.
Operations on application objects are done via one or more of the
existing EPP verbs defined in the EPP domain mapping. Registries may
choose to support a subset of the operations.
3.1. EPP <check> Command
This extension does not define any extension to the EPP <check>
command or response described in the EPP domain name mapping
[RFC5731].
3.2. EPP <info> Command
This extension defines additional elements to extend the EPP <info>
command and response to be used in conjunction with the domain name
mapping.
In order to indicate that the query is meant for an application
object, an <lp:info> element is sent along with the regular <info>
domain command. The <lp:info> element contains the following child
elements:
<lp:application_id> the application identifier for which the client
wishes to query.
<lp:phase> (optional) the phase during which the application was
submitted or is associated with.
If the query was successful, the server replies with an <lp:infData>
element along with the regular EPP <resData>. The <lp:infData<
contains the following child elements:
<lp:application_id> the application identifier of the returned
application.
<lp:phase> (optional) the phase during which the application was
submitted or is associated with.
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
<lp:status> (optional) status of the application.
<lp:trademark_name> (optional) registered trademark
<lp:trademark_number> (optional) registration number for the given
trademark
<lp:trademark_locality> (optional) locality in which the trademark
was registered
<lp:trademark_entitlement> (optional) capacity of the registrant in
regards to the ownership or rights to use the given trademark
<lp:pvrc> (optional) pre-verified code assigned by a third party
verification service to indicate trademark information that
has been previously validated.
3.2.1. Client Processing Considerations
The client MUST ensure that any successful <info> command results in
a response that an <lp:infData> element is returned in the response.
This serves as a cross check that the server did receive the query
for the application (and not a domain of the same name) and processed
it as it was intended.
3.2.2. Example <info> command
Following is an example <info> domain command with the <lp:info>
extension.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
<command>
<info>
<domain:info
xmlns:domain="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:domain-1.0">
<domain:name>example.tld</domain:name>
</domain:info>
</info>
<extension>
<lp:info xmlns:lp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:launchphase-1.0">
<lp:application_id>2393-9323-E08C-03B1</lp:application_id>
<lp:phase>phase1</lp:phase>
</lp:info>
</extension>
<clTRID>example:epp:239331</clTRID>
</command>
</epp>
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
An example response that corresponds to the above command.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
<response>
<result code="1000">
<msg>Command completed successfully</msg>
</result>
<resData>
<domain:infData
xmlns:domain="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:domain-1.0">
<domain:name>example.tld</domain:name>
<domain:roid>32302393_TESTDOMAIN-TLD</domain:roid>
<domain:status s="pendingCreate"/>
<domain:registrant>ga3000</domain:registrant>
<domain:contact type="admin">ue312987</domain:contact>
<domain:contact type="tech">ue312987</domain:contact>
<domain:contact type="billing">ue312987</domain:contact>
<domain:ns>
<domain:hostObj>ns1.example.com</domain:hostObj>
<domain:hostObj>ns2.example.net</domain:hostObj>
</domain:ns>
<domain:clID>client1</domain:clID>
<domain:crID>client1</domain:crID>
<domain:crDate>2010-09-18T06:12:39.0Z</domain:crDate>
<domain:authInfo>
<domain:pw>foo!bar#baz</domain:pw>
</domain:authInfo>
</domain:infData>
</resData>
<extension>
<lp:infData xmlns:lp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:launchphase-1.0">
<lp:application_id>2393-9323-E08C-03B1</lp:application_id>
<lp:phase>phase1</lp:phase>
<lp:status s="pending"/>
<lp:trademark_name>Hello</lp:trademark_name>
<lp:trademark_number>GE 3933232</lp:trademark_number>
<lp:trademark_locality>AU</lp:trademark_locality>
<lp:trademark_entitlement>owner</lp:trademark_entitlement>
<lp:pvrc>3828590-P1F-932391651E3A2900338C12</lp:pvrc>
</lp:infData>
</extension>
<trID>
<clTRID>example:epp:239331</clTRID>
<svTRID>server-8551292e23a</svTRID>
</trID>
</response>
</epp>
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
3.3. EPP <create> Command
This extension defines additional elements to extend the EPP <create>
command and response to be used in conjunction with the domain name
mapping.
The EPP <create> command is used to create an application. Typically
additional information is required to submit a domain name
application during a launch phase. This extension introduces an <lp:
create> to encapsulate commonly used fields. Another use case that
extension addresses is the plausible need for a registry to
distinguish between multiple (possibly concurrent) launch phases.
Clients may specify the <lp:phase> in which the application is meant
to be submitted. The <lp:create> element contains the following
child elements.
<lp:phase> (optional) the phase during which the application was
submitted or is associated with.
<lp:trademark_name> (optional) registered trademark
<lp:trademark_number> (optional) registration number for the given
trademark
<lp:trademark_locality> (optional) locality in which the trademark
was registered
<lp:trademark_entitlement> (optional) capacity of the registrant in
regards to the ownership or rights to use the given trademark
<lp:pvrc> (optional) pre-verified code assigned by a third party
verification service to indicate trademark information that
has been previously validated.
Upon successful processing, the server assigns an application
identifier and returns it in an <lp:creData> element together with
the regular <resData>. The <lp:creData> element contains a single
<lp:application_id> element as described below:
<lp:application_id> the application identifier assigned by the
server.
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
3.3.1. Example <create> command
Following is an example <create> domain command with the <lp:create>
extension.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
<command>
<create>
<domain:create
xmlns:domain="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:domain-1.0">
<domain:name>example.tld</domain:name>
<domain:period unit="y">2</domain:period>
<domain:ns>
<domain:hostObj>ns1.example.com</domain:hostObj>
<domain:hostObj>ns2.example.net</domain:hostObj>
</domain:ns>
<domain:registrant>ga3000</domain:registrant>
<domain:contact type="admin">ue312987</domain:contact>
<domain:contact type="tech">ue312987</domain:contact>
<domain:contact type="billing">ue312987</domain:contact>
<domain:authInfo>
<domain:pw>foo!bar#baz</domain:pw>
</domain:authInfo>
</domain:create>
</create>
<extension>
<lp:create xmlns:lp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:launchphase-1.0">
<lp:phase>phase1</lp:phase>
<lp:trademark_name>Hello</lp:trademark_name>
<lp:trademark_number>GE 3933232</lp:trademark_number>
<lp:trademark_locality>AU</lp:trademark_locality>
<lp:trademark_entitlement>owner</lp:trademark_entitlement>
<lp:pvrc>3828590-P1F-932391651E3A2900338C12</lp:pvrc>
</lp:create>
</extension>
<clTRID>example:epp:239332</clTRID>
</command>
</epp>
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
An example response that corresponds to the above command.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
<response>
<result code="1000">
<msg>Command completed successfully</msg>
</result>
<resData>
<domain:creData
xmlns:domain="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:domain-1.0">
<domain:name>example.tld</domain:name>
<domain:crDate>2010-08-10T15:38:26.623854Z</domain:crDate>
<domain:exDate>2012-08-10T15:38:26.623854Z</domain:exDate>
</domain:creData>
</resData>
<extension>
<lp:creData xmlns:lp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:launchphase-1.0">
<lp:application_id>2393-9323-E08C-03B1</lp:application_id>
</lp:creData>
</extension>
<trID>
<clTRID>example:epp:239332</clTRID>
<svTRID>server-8551292e23b</svTRID>
</trID>
</response>
</epp>
3.3.2. Client Processing Considerations
The client MUST ensure that any successful <info> command results in
a response that an <lp:infData> element is returned in the response.
This serves as a cross check that the server did receive the query
for the application (and not a domain of the same name) and processed
it as it was intended.
3.4. EPP <update> Command
This extension defines additional elements to extend the EPP <update>
command to be used in conjunction with the domain name mapping.
Registry policies permitting, clients may update an application
object by submitting an EPP <update> command along with an <lp:
update> element to indicate the application object to be updated.
The <lp:update> element contains the following child elements:
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
<lp:application_id> the application identifier for which the client
wishes to update.
<lp:phase> (optional) the phase during which the application was
submitted or is associated with.
This extension does not define any extension to the response of an
<update> domain command. After processing the command, the server
replies with a standard EPP response as defined in the EPP domain
mapping.
3.4.1. Server Processing Considerations
A server implementation that conforms to this specification MUST
respect and process the <lp:update> section, if present, and MUST
respond with an error if the application_id does not correspond with
the domain name in the <domain:name> element.
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
3.4.2. Example <update> command
Following is an example <update> domain command with the <lp:update>
extension.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
<command>
<update>
<domain:update
xmlns:domain="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:domain-1.0">
<domain:name>example.tld</domain:name>
<domain:add>
<domain:ns>
<domain:hostObj>ns3.example.org</domain:hostObj>
</domain:ns>
</domain:add>
<domain:rem>
<domain:ns>
<domain:hostObj>ns2.example.net</domain:hostObj>
</domain:ns>
</domain:rem>
<domain:chg>
<domain:registrant>n3o2999</domain:registrant>
</domain:chg>
</domain:update>
</update>
<extension>
<lp:update xmlns:lp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:launchphase-1.0">
<lp:application_id>2393-9323-E08C-03B1</lp:application_id>
<lp:phase>phase1</lp:phase>
</lp:update>
</extension>
<clTRID>example:epp:239333</clTRID>
</command>
</epp>
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
An example response that corresponds to the above command.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
<response>
<result code="1000">
<msg>Command completed successfully</msg>
</result>
<trID>
<clTRID>example:epp:239333</clTRID>
<svTRID>server-8551292e23c</svTRID>
</trID>
</response>
</epp>
3.5. EPP <delete> Command
This extension defines additional elements to extend the EPP <delete>
command to be used in conjunction with the domain name mapping.
Registry policies permitting, clients may withdraw an application by
submitting an EPP <delete> command along with an <lp:delete> element
to indicate the application object to be deleted. The <lp:delete>
element contains the following child elements:
<lp:application_id> the application identifier for which the client
wishes to delete.
<lp:phase> (optional) the phase during which the application was
submitted or is associated with.
This extension does not define any extension to the response of an
<delete> domain command. After processing the command, the server
replies with a standard EPP response as defined in the EPP domain
mapping.
3.5.1. Server Processing Considerations
A server implementation that conforms to this specification MUST
respect and process the <lp:delete> section, if present, and MUST
respond with an error if the application_id does not correspond with
the domain name in the <domain:name> element.
Depending on the server policy, an implementation may choose to
delete the application object immediately if business rules allow.
In that case, the server MUST respond with an EPP 1000 result code.
Alternatively, the server may choose to cancel the application
object, in which case it SHOULD respond with an EPP 1001 result code
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
to indicate that the object will be purged at a later date.
3.5.2. Example <delete> command
Following is an example <delete> domain command with the <lp:delete>
extension.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
<command>
<delete>
<domain:delete
xmlns:domain="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:domain-1.0">
<domain:name>example.tld</domain:name>
</domain:delete>
</delete>
<extension>
<lp:delete xmlns:lp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:launchphase-1.0">
<lp:application_id>2393-9323-E08C-03B1</lp:application_id>
<lp:phase>phase1</lp:phase>
</lp:delete>
</extension>
<clTRID>example:epp:239334</clTRID>
</command>
</epp>
An example response that corresponds to the above command.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">
<response>
<result code="1000">
<msg>Command completed successfully</msg>
</result>
<trID>
<clTRID>example:epp:239334</clTRID>
<svTRID>server-8551292e23d</svTRID>
</trID>
</response>
</epp>
3.6. EPP <renew> Command
This extension does not define any extension to the EPP <renew>
command or response described in the EPP domain name mapping
[RFC5731].
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
3.7. EPP <transfer> Command
This extension does not define any extension to the EPP <transfer>
command or response described in the EPP domain name mapping
[RFC5731].
4. Formal Syntax
Following is the content of "launchphase-1.0.xsd"
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:launchphase-1.0"
xmlns:lp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:launchphase-1.0"
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<annotation>
<documentation>
Extensible Provisioning Protocol v1.0
domain name extension schema for launch phase processing.
</documentation>
</annotation>
<!-- Command extension elements -->
<element name="create" type="lp:createType"/>
<element name="update" type="lp:queryType"/>
<element name="info" type="lp:queryType"/>
<element name="delete" type="lp:queryType"/>
<complexType name="createType">
<sequence>
<element name="phase" type="lp:idStringType" minOccurs="0" />
<element name="trademark_name"
type="lp:genericStringType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
<element name="trademark_number"
type="lp:genericStringType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
<element name="trademark_locality"
type="lp:ccType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
<element name="trademark_entitlement"
ype="lp:entitlementType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
<element name="pvrc"
type="lp:genericStringType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
<complexType name="queryType">
<sequence>
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
<element name="application_id" type="lp:idStringType" />
<element name="phase" type="lp:idStringType" minOccurs="0" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
<simpleType name="ccType">
<restriction base="token">
<length value="2"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<simpleType name="genericStringType">
<restriction base="normalizedString">
<minLength value="0"/>
<maxLength value="255"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<simpleType name="idStringType">
<restriction base="normalizedString">
<minLength value="0"/>
<maxLength value="25"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<simpleType name="entitlementType">
<restriction base="normalizedString">
<minLength value="0"/>
<maxLength value="50"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<complexType name="statusType">
<simpleContent>
<extension base="normalizedString">
<attribute name="s" type="token" use="required"/>
<attribute name="lang" type="language" default="en"/>
</extension>
</simpleContent>
</complexType>
<!--
Response extension elements
-->
<element name="infData" type="lp:infDataType"/>
<element name="creData" type="lp:creDataType"/>
<complexType name="creDataType">
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
<sequence>
<element name="application_id" type="lp:idStringType" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
<complexType name="infDataType">
<sequence>
<element name="application_id" type="lp:idStringType"/>
<element name="phase" type="lp:idStringType" minOccurs="0"/>
<element name="status" type="lp:statusType"/>
<element name="trademark_name"
type="lp:genericStringType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
<element name="trademark_number"
type="lp:genericStringType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
<element name="trademark_locality"
type="lp:ccType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
<element name="trademark_entitlement"
type="lp:entitlementType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
<element name="pvrc"
type="lp:genericStringType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</schema>
5. Acknowledgements
[to be filled in]
6. IANA Considerations
This document uses URNs to describe XML namespaces and XML schemas
conforming to a registry mechanism described in [RFC3688].
Two URI assignments have been completed by the IANA.
Registration request for the extension namespace:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:launchphase-1.0
Registrant Contact: IESG
XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification.
Registration request for the extension XML schema:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:launchphase-1.0
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
7. Security Considerations
The mapping extensions described in this document do not provide any
security services beyond those described by EPP [RFC5730], the EPP
domain name mapping [RFC5731], and protocol layers used by EPP. The
security considerations described in these other specifications apply
to this specification as well.
Updates to, and deletion of an application object must be restricted
to clients authorized to perform the said operation on the object.
As information contained within an application, or even the mere fact
that an application exists may be confidential. Any attempt to
operate on an application object by an unauthorized client MUST be
rejected with an EPP 2303 (object does not exist) or an appropriate
auhorization error. Server policy may allow <info> operation with
filtered output by clients other than the sponsoring client, in which
case the <domain:infData> and <lp:infData> response SHOULD be
filtered to include only fields that are publicly accessible.
8. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
January 2004.
[RFC5730] Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)",
STD 69, RFC 5730, August 2009.
[RFC5731] Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
Domain Name Mapping", STD 69, RFC 5731, August 2009.
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft Launch Phase Mapping for EPP April 2011
Authors' Addresses
Wil Tan
Cloud Registry
Suite 32 Seabridge House
377 Kent St
Sydney, NSW 2000
AU
Phone: +61 414 710899
Email: wil@cloudregistry.net
URI: http://www.cloudregistry.net
Gavin Brown
CentralNic Ltd
35-39 Mooregate
London, England EC2R 6AR
GB
Phone: +44 8700 170 900
Email: gavin.brown@centralnic.com
URI: http://www.centralnic.com
Tan & Brown Expires October 15, 2011 [Page 20]
Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129b, available from
https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/