[Docs] [txt|pdf|xml|html] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01

LPWAN                                                    P. Thubert, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                             Cisco Systems
Intended status: Standards Track                           25 March 2020
Expires: 26 September 2020


                 Command and Control Registry for SCHC
                   draft-thubert-lpwan-command-reg-01

Abstract

   This document creates a registry for command and control rule values
   across technologies

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 26 September 2020.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text
   as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.







Thubert                 Expires 26 September 2020               [Page 1]


Internet-Draft                SCHC commands                   March 2020


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     2.1.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     2.2.  BCP 14  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Purpose of this document  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   6.  Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   7.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   8.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4

1.  Introduction

   "Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) and fragmentation for
   LPWAN, application to UDP/IPv6" [SCHC] defines a generic compression
   and fragmentation protocol that is optimized for LPWAN networks.

   SCHC needs to be instanciated to be applied to a particular
   networking technology.  This is being done at the LPWAN WG for
   [LoRaWAN], [Sigfox], and [NB-IOT].

   SCHC does not have to be limited to compression and fragmentation; it
   can be extended for other purposes, e.g., to transport commands and
   responses.  The necessary commands appear to be very similar across
   technologies and it makes sense to create a shared IANA registry that
   is valid across technologies.

2.  Terminology

2.1.  References

2.2.  BCP 14

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119][RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

3.  Purpose of this document

   This document creates a registry for command and control rule values
   across technologies.  This does not mean that all technologies need
   to implement all the command and controls defined in the IANA
   registry that this document creates, either.



Thubert                 Expires 26 September 2020               [Page 2]


Internet-Draft                SCHC commands                   March 2020


4.  Security Considerations

   This specification only creates a registry.  There is no security
   consideration about the registry itself.

5.  IANA Considerations

   This specification creates a new Subregistry for the LPWAN command
   and control values for use within the [SCHC] protocol.

   *  Possible values are 8-bit unsigned integers (0..255).

   *  Registration procedure is "Standards Action" [RFC8126].

   *  Initial allocation is as indicated in Table 1:

                      +-------+---------+-----------+
                      | Value | Meaning | Reference |
                      +=======+=========+===========+
                      | 0     | Reset   | RFC THIS  |
                      +-------+---------+-----------+
                      | 1     | Ack     | RFC THIS  |
                      +-------+---------+-----------+
                      | 2     | Rekey   | RFC THIS  |
                      +-------+---------+-----------+

                         Table 1: Acceptance values
                             of the RPL Status

6.  Acknowledgments

   TBD

7.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

   [RFC8126]  Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
              Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
              RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.



Thubert                 Expires 26 September 2020               [Page 3]


Internet-Draft                SCHC commands                   March 2020


   [SCHC]     Minaburo, A., Toutain, L., Gomez, C., Barthel, D., and J.
              Zuniga, "Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) and
              fragmentation for LPWAN, application to UDP/IPv6", Work in
              Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-
              context-hc-24, 5 December 2019,
              <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-
              context-hc-24>.

8.  Informative References

   [Sigfox]   Zuniga, J., Gomez, C., and L. Toutain, "SCHC over Sigfox
              LPWAN", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
              lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-01, 4 November 2019,
              <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-
              sigfox-01>.

   [NB-IOT]   Ramos, E. and A. Minaburo, "SCHC over NB-IoT", Work in
              Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-
              nbiot-01, 16 November 2019, <https://tools.ietf.org/html/
              draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-01>.

   [LoRaWAN]  Gimenez, O. and I. Petrov, "Static Context Header
              Compression (SCHC) over LoRaWAN", Work in Progress,
              Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan-05, 20
              December 2019, <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-
              lpwan-schc-over-lorawan-05>.

Author's Address

   Pascal Thubert (editor)
   Cisco Systems, Inc
   Building D
   45 Allee des Ormes - BP1200
   06254 MOUGINS - Sophia Antipolis
   France

   Phone: +33 497 23 26 34
   Email: pthubert@cisco.com













Thubert                 Expires 26 September 2020               [Page 4]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129d, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/