[Docs] [txt|pdf|xml] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]
Versions: 00 01 02 03 04 05 RFC 7125
IPFIX Working Group B. Trammell
Internet-Draft ETH Zurich
Intended status: Informational P. Aitken
Expires: March 21, 2014 Cisco Systems, Inc
September 17, 2013
Revision of the tcpControlBits IPFIX Information Element
draft-trammell-ipfix-tcpcontrolbits-revision-03.txt
Abstract
This document revises the tcpControlBits IPFIX Information Element
defined in [RFC5102] to reflect changes to the TCP Flags header field
since [RFC0793].
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on March 21, 2014.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Trammell & Aitken Expires March 21, 2014 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft IPFIX tcpControlBits September 2013
1. Introduction
Octets 12 and 13 of the TCP header encode the data offset (header
length) in four bits, as well as 12 bits of flags. The least
significant 6 bits of these were defined in [RFC0793] as URG, ACK,
PSH, RST, SYN, and FIN for TCP control. Subsequently, [RFC3168]
defined the CWR and ECE flags for Explicit Congestion Notification
(ECN) negotiation and signaling; [RFC3540] additionally defined the
NS flag for the ECN Nonce Sum.
As defined in the IANA IPFIX Information Element Registry
[IANA-IPFIX], taken from [RFC5102], the tcpControlBits Information
Element for IPFIX [I-D.ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis] only covers
the original six bits from [RFC0793]. To allow IPFIX to be used to
measure the use of ECN, and to bring the IPFIX Information Element
definition in line with the current definition of the TCP Flags
header field, it is necessary to revise this definition.
The revised definition of the Information Element in Section 2 was
developed and approved through the IE-DOCTORS process
[I-D.ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors] in August 2013. Section 5.1 of
[I-D.ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors] states "This process should not in any
way be construed as allowing the IE-DOCTORS to overrule IETF
consensus. Specifically, Information Elements in the IANA IE
registry which were added with IETF consensus require IETF consensus
for revision or deprecation". Since the tcpControlBits Information
Element was defined in [RFC5102], an IETF Proposed Standard, any
revision of this Information Element definition requires IETF
Consensus. The publication of this document fulfills that
requirement.
The following section defines the revised tcpControlBits Information
Element as in Section 9.1 of [I-D.ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors].
2. The tcpControlBits Information Element
ElementId: 6
Data Type: unsigned16
Data Type Semantics: flags
Description: TCP control bits observed for the packets of this
Flow. This information is encoded as a bit field; for each TCP
control bit, there is a bit in this set. The bit is set to 1 if
any observed packet of this Flow has the corresponding TCP control
bit set to 1. The bit is cleared to 0 otherwise.
The values of each bit are shown below, per the definition of the
bits in the TCP header [RFC0793]:
Trammell & Aitken Expires March 21, 2014 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft IPFIX tcpControlBits September 2013
MSb LSb
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| | | N | C | E | U | A | P | R | S | F |
| Zero | Future | S | W | C | R | C | S | S | Y | I |
| (Data Offset) | Use | | R | E | G | K | H | T | N | N |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
bit flag
value name description
------+-----+-------------------------------------
0x8000 Zero (see tcpHeaderLength)
0x4000 Zero (see tcpHeaderLength)
0x2000 Zero (see tcpHeaderLength)
0x1000 Zero (see tcpHeaderLength)
0x0800 Future Use
0x0400 Future Use
0x0200 Future Use
0x0100 NS ECN Nonce Sum
0x0080 CWR Congestion Window Reduced
0x0040 ECE ECN Echo
0x0020 URG Urgent Pointer field significant
0x0010 ACK Acknowledgment field significant
0x0008 PSH Push Function
0x0004 RST Reset the connection
0x0002 SYN Synchronize sequence numbers
0x0001 FIN No more data from sender
As the most significant four bits of octets 12 and 13 of the TCP
header [RFC0793] are used to encode the TCP data offset (header
length), the corresponding bits in this IE must be exported as
zero and must be ignored by the collector; use the tcpHeaderLength
Information Element to encode this value.
Each of the three future use bits (0x800, 0x400, and 0x200) should
be exported as observed in the TCP headers of the packets of this
Flow, as they may be used subsequent to a future update of
[RFC0793].
If exported as a single octet with reduced size encoding, this
Information Element covers the low-order octet of this field (i.e,
bits 0x80 to 0x01), omitting the ECN Nonce Sum and the three
Future Use bits. A collector receiving this Information Element
with reduced size encoding must not assume anything about the
content of these four bits.
Trammell & Aitken Expires March 21, 2014 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft IPFIX tcpControlBits September 2013
Exporting Processes exporting this Information Element on behalf
of a Metering Process that is not capable of observing any of the
ECN Nonce Sum or Future Use bits should use reduced size encoding,
and only export the least significant 8 bits of this Information
Element.
Note that previous revisions of this Information Element's
definition specified that the CWR and ECE bits must be exported as
zero, even if observed. Collectors should therefore not assume
that a value of zero for these bits in this Information Element
indicates the bits were never set in the observed traffic,
especially if these bits are zero in every Flow Record sent by a
given exporter.
References: [RFC0793][RFC3168][RFC3540]
Revision: 1
3. IANA Considerations
IANA will update the definition of the tcpControlBits Information
Element in the the IANA IPFIX Information Element Registry
[IANA-IPFIX] to reflect the changes in Section 2 above.
4. Security and Privacy Considerations
This document has no security or privacy considerations; the security
considerations for IPFIX [I-D.ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis] apply.
5. Acknowledgments
Thanks to Andrew Feren and Lothar Braun for comments on the revised
definition. This work is partially supported by the European
Commission under grant agreement FP7-ICT-318627 mPlane; this does not
imply endorsement by the Commission.
6. References
6.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis]
Claise, B. and B. Trammell, "Specification of the IP Flow
Information eXport (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of
Flow Information", draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-10
(work in progress), July 2013.
[I-D.ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors]
Trammell, B. and B. Claise, "Guidelines for Authors and
Reviewers of IPFIX Information Elements", draft-ietf-
ipfix-ie-doctors-07 (work in progress), October 2012.
Trammell & Aitken Expires March 21, 2014 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft IPFIX tcpControlBits September 2013
[RFC0793] Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7, RFC
793, September 1981.
[RFC3168] Ramakrishnan, K., Floyd, S., and D. Black, "The Addition
of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP", RFC
3168, September 2001.
[RFC3540] Spring, N., Wetherall, D., and D. Ely, "Robust Explicit
Congestion Notification (ECN) Signaling with Nonces", RFC
3540, June 2003.
6.2. Informative References
[RFC5102] Quittek, J., Bryant, S., Claise, B., Aitken, P., and J.
Meyer, "Information Model for IP Flow Information Export",
RFC 5102, January 2008.
[IANA-IPFIX]
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, ., "IP Flow
Information Export Information Elements
(http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix)", .
Authors' Addresses
Brian Trammell
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
Gloriastrasse 35
8092 Zurich
Switzerland
Phone: +41 44 632 70 13
Email: trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch
Paul Aitken
Cisco Systems, Inc.
96 Commercial Quay
Commercial Street, Edinburgh EH6 6LX
United Kingdom
Phone: +44 131 561 3616
Email: paitken@cisco.com
Trammell & Aitken Expires March 21, 2014 [Page 5]
Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129b, available from
https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/