< draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana-01.txt   draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana-02.txt >
Network Working Group O. Troean Network Working Group O. Troean
Internet-Draft Cisco Systems Internet-Draft Cisco Systems
Updates: rfc4861 (if approved) January 10, 2018 Updates: 4861 (if approved) January 10, 2018
Intended status: Standards Track Intended status: Standards Track
Expires: July 14, 2018 Expires: July 14, 2018
IPv6 ND PIO Flags IANA considerations IPv6 ND PIO Flags IANA considerations
draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana-01 draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana-02
Abstract Abstract
The Prefix Information Option in the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Router The Prefix Information Option in the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Router
Advertisement defines an 8-bit flag field with two flags defined and Advertisement defines an 8-bit flag field with two flags defined and
the remaining 6 bits reserved (Reserved1). RFC 6275 has defined a the remaining 6 bits reserved (Reserved1). RFC 6275 has defined a
new flag from this field without creating a IANA registry or updating new flag from this field without creating a IANA registry or updating
RFC 4861. The purpose of this document is to request that IANA to RFC 4861. The purpose of this document is to request that IANA to
create a new registry for the PIO flags to avoid potential conflict create a new registry for the PIO flags to avoid potential conflict
in the use of these flags. This document updates RFC 4861. in the use of these flags. This document updates RFC 4861.
skipping to change at page 3, line 22 skipping to change at page 3, line 22
+---------------+---------------------------------+-----------+ +---------------+---------------------------------+-----------+
Figure 2 Figure 2
The assignment of new flags in the PIO option header require The assignment of new flags in the PIO option header require
standards action. standards action.
The registry for these flags should be added to: The registry for these flags should be added to:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters
5. References 5. Security Considerations
5.1. Normative References This document has no security considerations.
6. References
6.1. Normative References
[RFC4861] Narten, T., Nordmark, E., Simpson, W., and H. Soliman, [RFC4861] Narten, T., Nordmark, E., Simpson, W., and H. Soliman,
"Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 4861, "Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 4861,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4861, September 2007, DOI 10.17487/RFC4861, September 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4861>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4861>.
5.2. Informative References 6.2. Informative References
[RFC6275] Perkins, C., Ed., Johnson, D., and J. Arkko, "Mobility [RFC6275] Perkins, C., Ed., Johnson, D., and J. Arkko, "Mobility
Support in IPv6", RFC 6275, DOI 10.17487/RFC6275, July Support in IPv6", RFC 6275, DOI 10.17487/RFC6275, July
2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6275>. 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6275>.
Author's Address Author's Address
Ole Troean Ole Troean
Cisco Systems Cisco Systems
Philip Pedersens vei 1 Philip Pedersens vei 1
 End of changes. 5 change blocks. 
5 lines changed or deleted 9 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.47. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/