< draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-03.txt   draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-04.txt >
LISP Working Group A. Rodriguez-Natal LISP Working Group A. Rodriguez-Natal
Internet-Draft V. Ermagan Internet-Draft Cisco Systems
Intended status: Experimental A. Smirnov Intended status: Experimental V. Ermagan
Expires: April 11, 2019 V. Ashtaputre Expires: October 6, 2019 Google
A. Smirnov
V. Ashtaputre
Cisco Systems Cisco Systems
D. Farinacci D. Farinacci
lispers.net lispers.net
October 8, 2018 April 4, 2019
Vendor Specific LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF) Vendor Specific LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF)
draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-03 draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-04
Abstract Abstract
This document describes a new LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF), This document describes a new LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF),
the Vendor Specific LCAF. This LCAF enables organizations to have the Vendor Specific LCAF. This LCAF enables organizations to have
internal encodings for LCAF addresses. internal encodings for LCAF addresses.
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
skipping to change at page 1, line 36 skipping to change at page 1, line 38
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 11, 2019. This Internet-Draft will expire on October 6, 2019.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
skipping to change at page 4, line 29 skipping to change at page 4, line 29
| 255 | Vendor Specific | Section 3 | | 255 | Vendor Specific | Section 3 |
+---------+---------------------+------------+ +---------+---------------------+------------+
Table 1: Vendor Specific LCAF assignment Table 1: Vendor Specific LCAF assignment
7. Normative References 7. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis] [I-D.ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis]
Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Meyer, D., Lewis, D., and A. Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Meyer, D., Lewis, D., and A.
Cabellos-Aparicio, "The Locator/ID Separation Protocol Cabellos-Aparicio, "The Locator/ID Separation Protocol
(LISP)", draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-23 (work in progress), (LISP)", draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-26 (work in progress),
October 2018. November 2018.
[I-D.ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis] [I-D.ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis]
Fuller, V., Farinacci, D., and A. Cabellos-Aparicio, Fuller, V., Farinacci, D., and A. Cabellos-Aparicio,
"Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Control-Plane", "Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Control-Plane",
draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-17 (work in progress), October draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24 (work in progress), February
2018. 2019.
[IEEE.802_2001] [IEEE.802_2001]
IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area
Networks: Overview and Architecture", IEEE 802-2001, Networks: Overview and Architecture", IEEE 802-2001,
DOI 10.1109/ieeestd.2002.93395, July 2002, DOI 10.1109/ieeestd.2002.93395, July 2002,
<http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=7732>. <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=7732>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
skipping to change at page 5, line 24 skipping to change at page 5, line 24
Authors' Addresses Authors' Addresses
Alberto Rodriguez-Natal Alberto Rodriguez-Natal
Cisco Systems Cisco Systems
San Jose, CA San Jose, CA
USA USA
Email: natal@cisco.com Email: natal@cisco.com
Vina Ermagan Vina Ermagan
Cisco Systems Google
San Jose, CA
USA USA
Email: vermagan@cisco.com Email: ermagan@gmail.com
Anton Smirnov Anton Smirnov
Cisco Systems Cisco Systems
Diegem Diegem
Belgium Belgium
Email: asmirnov@cisco.com Email: asmirnov@cisco.com
Vrushali Ashtaputre Vrushali Ashtaputre
Cisco Systems Cisco Systems
 End of changes. 9 change blocks. 
14 lines changed or deleted 15 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.47. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/