< draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len-13.txt   draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len-14.txt >
6MAN Working Group A. Petrescu 6MAN Working Group A. Petrescu
Internet-Draft CEA, LIST Internet-Draft CEA, LIST
Updates: RFC4291, RFC4007 (if approved) L. Velvindron Updates: RFC4291, RFC4007 (if approved) L. Velvindron
Intended status: Standards Track Cyberstorm.mu Intended status: Standards Track Cyberstorm.mu
Expires: October 28, 2019 N. Kottapalli Expires: October 29, 2019 N. Kottapalli
Benu Networks Benu Networks
April 26, 2019 G. Mishra
Verizon Communications
April 27, 2019
The length of the prefix of an IPv6 link-local address ranges from 10 to The length of the prefix of an IPv6 link-local address ranges from 10 to
127 127
draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len-13 draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len-14
Abstract Abstract
A rejected Erratum to RFC4291 "IPv6 Addr Archi" on the topic of link- A rejected Erratum to RFC4291 "IPv6 Addr Archi" on the topic of link-
local addresses 'would need' a draft. This is an answer to that local addresses 'would need' a draft. This is an answer to that
need. need.
The length of the prefix of an IPv6 link-local address is variable. The length of the prefix of an IPv6 link-local address is variable.
The minimal value is 10 decimal. The maximum value is 127 decimal. The minimal value is 10 decimal. The maximum value is 127 decimal.
skipping to change at page 1, line 39 skipping to change at page 1, line 41
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 28, 2019. This Internet-Draft will expire on October 29, 2019.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 8, line 28 skipping to change at page 8, line 28
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
Appendix A. ChangeLog Appendix A. ChangeLog
The changes are listed in reverse chronological order, most recent The changes are listed in reverse chronological order, most recent
changes appearing at the top of the list. changes appearing at the top of the list.
-14: updated authorship.
-13: added a Problem Statement section; added the name of the -13: added a Problem Statement section; added the name of the
Organisation of one co-author; distinguished between 'need' and Organisation of one co-author; distinguished between 'need' and
'would need' a draft. 'would need' a draft.
-12: the '64' in GUA vs '64' in LL issued by distinct sources: RA vs -12: the '64' in GUA vs '64' in LL issued by distinct sources: RA vs
RFC4291 respectively; the address fe80::1/128 is present on the RFC4291 respectively; the address fe80::1/128 is present on the
loopback interface of BSD; detailed, again, the distinction for 'on- loopback interface of BSD; detailed, again, the distinction for 'on-
link' determination; detailed, again, the distinction between link' determination; detailed, again, the distinction between
'assignment' and 'allocation'; added the fact that Cisco supports 'assignment' and 'allocation'; added the fact that Cisco supports
manual assignment of fe80:1::1. manual assignment of fe80:1::1.
skipping to change at page 9, line 41 skipping to change at page 10, line 4
Email: Alexandre.Petrescu@cea.fr Email: Alexandre.Petrescu@cea.fr
Loganaden Velvindron Loganaden Velvindron
Cyberstorm.mu Cyberstorm.mu
street street
city , region code city , region code
country country
Phone: +phonenumber Phone: +phonenumber
Email: loganaden@gmail.com Email: loganaden@gmail.com
Naveen Kottapalli Naveen Kottapalli
Benu Networks Benu Networks
street street
City , Region code City , Region code
Country Country
Phone: +phonenumber Phone: +phonenumber
Email: naveen.sarma@gmail.com Email: naveen.sarma@gmail.com
Gyan Mishra
Verizon Communications
street
City , Region code
Country
Phone: cell 202 734-1000
Email: hayabusagsm@gmail.com
 End of changes. 7 change blocks. 
5 lines changed or deleted 8 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.47. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/