draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-00.txt		draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-01.txt
			CCAMP Working Group Zafar Ali
			Internet Draft Antonello Bonfanti
			Intended status: Informational Matt Hartley
			Cisco Systems
			F. Zhang
			Huawei Technologies
			Expires: September 9, 2015 March 6, 2015
	CCAMP Working Group Zafar Ali		Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
	Internet Draft Antonello Bonfanti		Extension for Additional Signal Types in G.709 OTN
	Intended status: Informational Cisco Systems		draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-01.txt
	F. Zhang
	Huawei Technologies
	Expires: May 12, 2015 November 13, 2014
	Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)		Status of this Memo
	Extension for Additional Signal Types in G.709 OTN
	draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-00.txt
	Status of this Memo		This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
			provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
	This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the		Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
	provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.		Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
			working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
			Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering		Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
	Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute		months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
	working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-		documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts
	Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.		as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in
			progress."
	Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six		This Internet-Draft will expire on September 9, 2015.
	months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
	documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts
	as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in
	progress."
	This Internet-Draft will expire on May 12, 2015.		Copyright Notice
	Copyright Notice		Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
			document authors. All rights reserved.
	Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the		This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
	document authors. All rights reserved.		Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
			(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
			publication of this document. Please review these documents
			carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with
			respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this
			document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in
			Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without
			warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
	This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal		This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
	Provisions Relating to IETF Documents		Contributions published or made publicly available before November
	(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of		Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-
	publication of this document. Please review these documents		01.txt
	carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with
	respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this
	document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in
	Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without
	warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
	This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF		10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
	Contributions published or made publicly available before November		material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
	10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this		modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
	Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-00.txt		Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s)
			controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not
			be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative
			works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process,
			except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it
			into languages other than English.
	material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow		Abstract
	modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
	Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s)
	controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not
	be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative
	works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process,
	except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it
	into languages other than English.
	Abstract		[RFC4328] and [RFC7139] provide the extensions to Generalized
			Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) signaling to control the
			full set of OTN features including ODU0, ODU1, ODU2, ODU3, ODU4,
			ODU2e and ODUflex. However, these specifications do not cover the
			additional signal types ODU1e, ODU3e1, and ODU3e2 mentioned in
			[G.Sup43]. This draft provides GMPLS signaling extensions for these
			additional signal types.
	[RFC4328] and [RFC7139] provide the extensions to the Generalized		Conventions used in this document
	Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) signaling to control the
	full set of OTN features including ODU0, ODU1, ODU2, ODU3, ODU4,
	ODU2e and ODUflex. However, these specifications do not cover
	additional signal types ODU1e, ODU3e1, and ODU3e2 mentioned in
	[G.Sup43]. This draft provides GMPLS signaling extension for these
	additional signal types.
	Conventions used in this document		The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
			"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in
			this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119
			[RFC2119].
	The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",		Table of Contents
	"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in
	this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119
	[RFC2119].
	Table of Contents		1. Introduction 2
			2. RSVP-TE extension for Additional Signal Types 3
			3. Security Considerations 3
			4. IANA Considerations 3
			5. Acknowledgments 3
			6. References 3
			6.1. Normative References 3
			6.2. Informative References 4
	1. Introduction .............................................. 2		1. Introduction
	2. RSVP-TE extension for Additional Signal Types ............. 2
	3. Security Considerations ................................... 3
	4. IANA Considerations ....................................... 3
	5. Acknowledgments ........................................... 3
	6. References ................................................ 3
	6.1. Normative References .................................. 3
	6.2. Informative References ................................ 4
	1. Introduction		[RFC7139] updates the ODU-related portions of [RFC4328] to
			provide Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-
			TE) extensions to support control for [G.709-v3]. However, it
			does not cover additional signal types mentioned in [G.Sup43]
			(ODU1e, ODU3e1, and ODU3e2). This draft provides GMPLS signaling
			extension to support these additional signal types mentioned in
			[G.Sup43].
	[RFC7139] updates the ODU-related portions of [RFC4328] to		Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-
	provide Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-		01.txt
	TE) extensions to support control for [G.709-v3]. However, it
	does not cover additional signal types mentioned in [G.Sup43]
	(ODU1e, ODU3e1, and ODU3e2). This draft provides GMPLS signaling
	extension to support these additional signal types mentioned in
	[G.Sup43].
	2. RSVP-TE extension for Additional Signal Types		2. RSVP-TE extension for Additional Signal Types
	[RFC7139] defines the format of Traffic Parameters in OTN-TDM		[RFC7139] defines the format of Traffic Parameters in OTN-TDM
	SENDER_TSPEC and OTN-TDM FLOWSPEC objects. The said traffic		SENDER_TSPEC and OTN-TDM FLOWSPEC objects. These traffic
	parameters have a signal type field. This document defines the		parameters have a signal type field. This document defines the
	Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-00.txt		signal type for ODU1e, ODU3e1 and ODU3e2 as defined in the IANA
			considerations section.
	signal type for ODU1e, ODU3e1 and ODU3e2 as defined in the IANA		3. Security Considerations
	consideration section.
	3. Security Considerations		This document does not introduce any additional security issues
			above those identified in [RFC7139].
	This document does not introduce any additional security issues		4. IANA Considerations
	above those identified in [RFC7139].
	4. IANA Considerations		This document defines signal type for ODU1e, ODU3e1 and ODU3e2,
			as follows:
			Value Type
			----- ----
			TBD ODU1e (10Gbps Ethernet [GSUP.43])
			TBD ODU3e1 (40Gbps Ethernet [GSUP.43])
			TBD ODU3e2 (40Gbps Ethernet [GSUP.43])
	This document defines signal type for ODU1e, ODU3e1 and ODU3e2,		These signaled types are carried in Traffic Parameters in OTN-
	as follows:		TDM SENDER_TSPEC and OTN-TDM FLOWSPEC objects [RFC7139].
	Value Type
	----- ----
	TBD ODU1e (10Gbps Ethernet [GSUP.43])
	TBD ODU3e1 (40Gbps Ethernet [GSUP.43])
	TBD ODU3e2 (40Gbps Ethernet [GSUP.43])
	These signaled types are carried in Traffic Parameters in OTN-		5. Acknowledgments
	TDM SENDER_TSPEC and OTN-TDM FLOWSPEC objects [RFC7139].
	5. Acknowledgments		The authors would like to thank Lou Berger, Adrian Farrel and
			Sudip Shukla for comments.
	The authors would like to thank Lou Berger, Adrian Farrel and		6. References
	Sudip Shukla for comments.
	6. References		6.1. Normative References
	6.1. Normative References		[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
			Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
	[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate		[RFC4328] Papadimitriou, D., Ed., "Generalized Multi-Protocol
	Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.		Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for G.709
			Optical Transport Networks Control", RFC 4328, January
			2006.
	[RFC4328] Papadimitriou, D., Ed., "Generalized Multi-Protocol		[RFC7139] Zhang, F., Ed., Zhang, G., Belotti, S., Ceccarelli,
	Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for G.709		D., and K. Pithewan, "GMPLS Signaling Extensions for
	Optical Transport Networks Control", RFC 4328, January		Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks",
	2006.		RFC 7139, March 2014.
	[RFC7139] Zhang, F., Ed., Zhang, G., Belotti, S., Ceccarelli,		Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-
	D., and K. Pithewan, "GMPLS Signaling Extensions for		01.txt
	Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks",
	RFC 7139, March 2014.
	[RFC7139] F.Zhang, G.Zhang, S.Belotti, D.Ceccarelli, K.Pithewan,		[RFC7139] F.Zhang, G.Zhang, S.Belotti, D.Ceccarelli, K.Pithewan,
	"Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)		"Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
	Signaling Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical		Signaling Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical
	Transport Networks Control, draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-		Transport Networks Control, draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-
	signaling-g709v3, work in progress.		signaling-g709v3, work in progress.
	Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-00.txt		6.2. Informative References
	6.2. Informative References		[G.709-v3] ITU-T, "Interface for the Optical Transport Network
			(OTN)", G.709/Y.1331 Recommendation, February, 2012.
	[G.709-v3] ITU-T, "Interface for the Optical Transport Network		[GSUP.43] ITU-T, "Proposed revision of G.sup43 (for agreement)",
	(OTN)", G.709/Y.1331 Recommendation, February, 2012.		February, 2011.
	[GSUP.43] ITU-T, "Proposed revision of G.sup43 (for agreement)",		Authors' Addresses
	February, 2011.
	Authors' Addresses		Zafar Ali
			Cisco Systems
			Email: zali@cisco.com
	Zafar Ali		Antonello Bonfanti
	Cisco Systems		Cisco Systems
	Email: zali@cisco.com		abonfant@cisco.com
	Antonello Bonfanti		Matt Hartley
	Cisco Systems		Cisco Systems
	abonfant@cisco.com		mhartley@cisco.com
	Fatai Zhang		Fatai Zhang
	Huawei Technologies		Huawei Technologies
	Email: zhangfatai@huawei.com		Email: zhangfatai@huawei.com
End of changes. 45 change blocks.
	129 lines changed or deleted		136 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.42. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/