draft-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis-02.txt		draft-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis-03.txt
	Network Working Group A. Takacs		Network Working Group A. Takacs
	Internet-Draft Ericsson		Internet-Draft Ericsson
	Obsoletes: 5467 (if approved) L. Berger		Obsoletes: 5467 (if approved) L. Berger
	Intended status: Standards Track LabN Consulting, L.L.C.		Intended status: Standards Track LabN Consulting, L.L.C.
	Expires: December 31, 2011 D. Caviglia		Expires: February 11, 2012 D. Caviglia
	Ericsson		Ericsson
	D. Fedyk		D. Fedyk
	Alcatel-Lucent		Alcatel-Lucent
	J. Meuric		J. Meuric
	France Telecom Orange		France Telecom Orange
	June 29, 2011		August 10, 2011
	GMPLS Asymmetric Bandwidth Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs)		GMPLS Asymmetric Bandwidth Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
	draft-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis-02.txt		draft-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis-03.txt
	Abstract		Abstract
	This document defines a method for the support of GMPLS asymmetric		This document defines a method for the support of GMPLS asymmetric
	bandwidth bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs). The presented		bandwidth bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs). The presented
	approach is applicable to any switching technology and builds on the		approach is applicable to any switching technology and builds on the
	original Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) model for the transport		original Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) model for the transport
	of traffic-related parameters. This document moves the experiment		of traffic-related parameters. This document moves the experiment
	documented in RFC 5467 to the standards track and obsoletes RFC 5467.		documented in RFC 5467 to the standards track and obsoletes RFC 5467.
	skipping to change at page 1, line 42		skipping to change at page 1, line 42
	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering		Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
	Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute		Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
	working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-		working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
	Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.		Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
	Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months		Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
	and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any		and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
	time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference		time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
	material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."		material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
	This Internet-Draft will expire on December 31, 2011.		This Internet-Draft will expire on February 11, 2012.
	Copyright Notice		Copyright Notice
	Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the		Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
	document authors. All rights reserved.		document authors. All rights reserved.
	This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal		This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
	Provisions Relating to IETF Documents		Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
	(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of		(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
	publication of this document. Please review these documents		publication of this document. Please review these documents
	skipping to change at page 6, line 24		skipping to change at page 6, line 24
	that they relate to traffic flowing in the upstream direction while		that they relate to traffic flowing in the upstream direction while
	the existing objects relate to traffic flowing in the downstream		the existing objects relate to traffic flowing in the downstream
	direction. The new objects also differ in that they are carried in		direction. The new objects also differ in that they are carried in
	messages traveling in the opposite direction.		messages traveling in the opposite direction.
	2.1. UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC Object		2.1. UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC Object
	The format of an UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object is the same as a FLOWSPEC		The format of an UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object is the same as a FLOWSPEC
	object [RFC2210]. This includes the definition of class types and		object [RFC2210]. This includes the definition of class types and
	their formats. The class number of the UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object is		their formats. The class number of the UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object is
	TBA by IANA (of the form 0bbbbbbb).		120 (of the form 0bbbbbbb).
	2.1.1. Procedures		2.1.1. Procedures
	The Path message of an asymmetric bandwidth bidirectional LSP MUST		The Path message of an asymmetric bandwidth bidirectional LSP MUST
	contain an UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object and MUST use the bidirectional		contain an UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object and MUST use the bidirectional
	LSP formats and procedures defined in [RFC3473]. The C-Type of the		LSP formats and procedures defined in [RFC3473]. The C-Type of the
	UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object MUST match the C-Type of the SENDER_TSPEC		UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object MUST match the C-Type of the SENDER_TSPEC
	object used in the Path message. The contents of the		object used in the Path message. The contents of the
	UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object MUST be constructed using a format and		UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object MUST be constructed using a format and
	procedures consistent with those used to construct the FLOWSPEC		procedures consistent with those used to construct the FLOWSPEC
	skipping to change at page 6, line 49		skipping to change at page 6, line 49
	upstream label and the resource allocation procedure defined in		upstream label and the resource allocation procedure defined in
	Section 3.1 of [RFC3473]. Consistent with [RFC3473], a node that is		Section 3.1 of [RFC3473]. Consistent with [RFC3473], a node that is
	unable to allocate a label or internal resources based on the		unable to allocate a label or internal resources based on the
	contents of the UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object MUST issue a PathErr message		contents of the UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object MUST issue a PathErr message
	with a "Routing problem/MPLS label allocation failure" indication.		with a "Routing problem/MPLS label allocation failure" indication.
	2.2. UPSTREAM_TSPEC Object		2.2. UPSTREAM_TSPEC Object
	The format of an UPSTREAM_TSPEC object is the same as a SENDER_TSPEC		The format of an UPSTREAM_TSPEC object is the same as a SENDER_TSPEC
	object. This includes the definition of class types and their		object. This includes the definition of class types and their
	formats. The class number of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object is TBA by		formats. The class number of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object is 121 (of
	IANA (of the form 0bbbbbbb).		the form 0bbbbbbb).
	2.2.1. Procedures		2.2.1. Procedures
	The UPSTREAM_TSPEC object describes the traffic flow that originates		The UPSTREAM_TSPEC object describes the traffic flow that originates
	at the egress. The UPSTREAM_TSPEC object MUST be included in any		at the egress. The UPSTREAM_TSPEC object MUST be included in any
	Resv message that corresponds to a Path message containing an		Resv message that corresponds to a Path message containing an
	UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object. The C-Type of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object		UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object. The C-Type of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object
	MUST match the C-Type of the corresponding UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object.		MUST match the C-Type of the corresponding UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object.
	The contents of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object MUST be constructed using a		The contents of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object MUST be constructed using a
	format and procedures consistent with those used to construct the		format and procedures consistent with those used to construct the
	skipping to change at page 7, line 33		skipping to change at page 7, line 33
	issue a Path message with an updated UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object to		issue a Path message with an updated UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object to
	modify the resources requested for the upstream traffic flow. This		modify the resources requested for the upstream traffic flow. This
	modification might require the LSP to be re-routed, and in extreme		modification might require the LSP to be re-routed, and in extreme
	cases might result in the LSP being torn down when sufficient		cases might result in the LSP being torn down when sufficient
	resources are not available along the path of the LSP.		resources are not available along the path of the LSP.
	2.3. UPSTREAM_ADSPEC Object		2.3. UPSTREAM_ADSPEC Object
	The format of an UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object is the same as an ADSPEC		The format of an UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object is the same as an ADSPEC
	object. This includes the definition of class types and their		object. This includes the definition of class types and their
	formats. The class number of the UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object is TBA by		formats. The class number of the UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object is 122 (of
	IANA (of the form 0bbbbbbb).		the form 0bbbbbbb).
	2.3.1. Procedures		2.3.1. Procedures
	The UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object MAY be included in any Resv message that		The UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object MAY be included in any Resv message that
	corresponds to a Path message containing an UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object.		corresponds to a Path message containing an UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object.
	The C-Type of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object MUST be consistent with the		The C-Type of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object MUST be consistent with the
	C-Type of the corresponding UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object. The contents		C-Type of the corresponding UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object. The contents
	of the UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object MUST be constructed using a format and		of the UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object MUST be constructed using a format and
	procedures consistent with those used to construct the ADSPEC object		procedures consistent with those used to construct the ADSPEC object
	that will be used for the LSP, e.g., [RFC2210] or [RFC6003]. The		that will be used for the LSP, e.g., [RFC2210] or [RFC6003]. The
	skipping to change at page 11, line 7		skipping to change at page 11, line 7
	bandwidth, three new objects are defined. Each of these objects is		bandwidth, three new objects are defined. Each of these objects is
	defined with class numbers in the form 0bbbbbbb. Per [RFC2205],		defined with class numbers in the form 0bbbbbbb. Per [RFC2205],
	nodes not supporting this extension will not recognize the new class		nodes not supporting this extension will not recognize the new class
	numbers and will respond with an "Unknown Object Class" error. The		numbers and will respond with an "Unknown Object Class" error. The
	error message will propagate to the ingress, which can then take		error message will propagate to the ingress, which can then take
	action to avoid the path with the incompatible node or can simply		action to avoid the path with the incompatible node or can simply
	terminate the session.		terminate the session.
	5. IANA Considerations		5. IANA Considerations
	IANA is requested to release the Experimental Review code points		The IANA has made the assignments described below in the "Class
	allocated by RFC5467 and assigne code points from the Standrads		Names, Class Numbers, and Class Types" section of the "RSVP
	Action range from the objects defined in this document.
	The IANA is requested to make the assignments described below in the
	"Class Names, Class Numbers, and Class Types" section of the "RSVP
	PARAMETERS" registry.		PARAMETERS" registry.
	5.1. UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC Object		5.1. UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC Object
	A new class named UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC has to be created in the 0bbbbbbb		A new class named UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC has been created in the 0bbbbbbb
	range with the following definition:		range (120) with the following definition:
	Class Types or C-types:		Class Types or C-types:
	Same values as FLOWSPEC object (C-Num 9)		Same values as FLOWSPEC object (C-Num 9)
	5.2. UPSTREAM_TSPEC Object		5.2. UPSTREAM_TSPEC Object
	A new class named UPSTREAM_TSPEC has to be created in the 0bbbbbbb		A new class named UPSTREAM_TSPEC has been created in the 0bbbbbbb
	range with the following definition:		range (121) with the following definition:
	Class Types or C-types:		Class Types or C-types:
	Same values as SENDER_TSPEC object (C-Num 12)		Same values as SENDER_TSPEC object (C-Num 12)
	5.3. UPSTREAM_ADSPEC Object		5.3. UPSTREAM_ADSPEC Object
	A new class named UPSTREAM_ADSPEC has to be created in the 0bbbbbbb		A new class named UPSTREAM_ADSPEC has been created in the 0bbbbbbb
	range with the following definition:		range (122) with the following definition:
	Class Types or C-types:		Class Types or C-types:
	Same values as ADSPEC object (C-Num 13)		Same values as ADSPEC object (C-Num 13)
	6. Security Considerations		6. Security Considerations
	This document introduces new message objects for use in GMPLS		This document introduces new message objects for use in GMPLS
	signaling [RFC3473] -- specifically the UPSTREAM_TSPEC,		signaling [RFC3473] -- specifically the UPSTREAM_TSPEC,
	UPSTREAM_ADSPEC, and UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC objects. These objects		UPSTREAM_ADSPEC, and UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC objects. These objects
End of changes. 11 change blocks.
	21 lines changed or deleted		17 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.41. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/