draft-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework-01.txt | draft-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework-02.txt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
CCAMP WG J. Ahlberg | CCAMP WG J. Ahlberg | |||
Internet-Draft Ericsson AB | Internet-Draft Ericsson AB | |||
Intended status: Informational LM. Contreras | Intended status: Informational LM. Contreras | |||
Expires: December 22, 2017 TID | Expires: April 23, 2018 TID | |||
A. Ye Min | M.Ye | |||
Huawei | Huawei Technologies CO., Ltd | |||
M. Vaupotic | M. Vaupotic | |||
Aviat Networks | Aviat Networks | |||
J. Tantsura | J. Tantsura | |||
Individual | Individual | |||
K. Kawada | K. Kawada | |||
NEC Corporation | NEC Corporation | |||
X. Li | X. Li | |||
NEC Laboratories Europe | NEC Laboratories Europe | |||
I. Akiyoshi | I. Akiyoshi | |||
NEC | NEC | |||
CJ. Bernardos | CJ. Bernardos | |||
UC3M | UC3M | |||
June 20, 2017 | D. Spreafico | |||
Nokia - IT | ||||
October 20, 2017 | ||||
A framework for Management and Control of microwave and | A framework for Management and Control of microwave and | |||
millimeter wave interface parameters | millimeter wave interface parameters | |||
draft-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework-01 | draft-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework-02 | |||
Abstract | Abstract | |||
To ensure an efficient data transport, meeting the requirements | To ensure an efficient data transport, meeting the requirements | |||
requested by today's transport services, the unification of control | requested by today's transport services, the unification of control | |||
and management of microwave and millimeter wave radio link interfaces | and management of microwave and millimeter wave radio link interfaces | |||
is a precondition for seamless multilayer networking and automated | is a precondition for seamless multilayer networking and automated | |||
network wide provisioning and operation. | network wide provisioning and operation. | |||
This document describes the required characteristics and use cases | This document describes the required characteristics and use cases | |||
skipping to change at page 1, line 48 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 50 ¶ | |||
management model that is aligned with how other packet technology | management model that is aligned with how other packet technology | |||
interfaces in a microwave/millimeter wave node are modeled, the need | interfaces in a microwave/millimeter wave node are modeled, the need | |||
to support core parameters and at the same time allow for optional | to support core parameters and at the same time allow for optional | |||
product/feature specific parameters supporting new, unique innovative | product/feature specific parameters supporting new, unique innovative | |||
features until they have become mature enough to be included in the | features until they have become mature enough to be included in the | |||
standardized model. | standardized model. | |||
The purpose is to create a framework for identification of the | The purpose is to create a framework for identification of the | |||
necessary information elements and definition of a YANG Data Model | necessary information elements and definition of a YANG Data Model | |||
for control and management of the radio link interfaces in a | for control and management of the radio link interfaces in a | |||
microwave/millimeter wave node. | microwave/millimeter wave node. Some part of the resulting model MAY | |||
be generic which COULD also be used by other technology. | ||||
Status of This Memo | Status of This Memo | |||
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | |||
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. | provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. | |||
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |||
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |||
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |||
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 22, 2017. | This Internet-Draft will expire on April 23, 2018. | |||
Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
skipping to change at page 3, line 42 ¶ | skipping to change at page 3, line 42 ¶ | |||
6. Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 | 6. Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 | |||
7. Gap Analysis on Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 | 7. Gap Analysis on Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 | |||
7.1. Microwave Radio Link Functionality . . . . . . . . . . . 13 | 7.1. Microwave Radio Link Functionality . . . . . . . . . . . 13 | |||
7.2. Generic Functionality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 | 7.2. Generic Functionality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 | |||
7.3. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 | 7.3. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 | |||
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 | 8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 | |||
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 | 9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 | |||
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 | 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 | |||
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 | 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 | |||
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 | 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 | |||
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 | |||
1. Terminology and Definitions | 1. Terminology and Definitions | |||
Microwave is a band of spectrum with wavelengths ranging from 1 | Microwave is a band of spectrum with wavelengths ranging from 1 | |||
meter to 1 millimeter and with frequencies ranging between 300 MHz | meter to 1 millimeter and with frequencies ranging between 300 MHz | |||
and 300 GHz. Microwave radio technology is widely used for point-to- | and 300 GHz. Microwave radio technology is widely used for point-to- | |||
point telecommunications because of their small wavelength that | point telecommunications because of their small wavelength that | |||
allows conveniently-sized antennas to direct them in narrow beams, | allows conveniently-sized antennas to direct them in narrow beams, | |||
and their comparatively higher frequencies that allows broad | and their comparatively higher frequencies that allows broad | |||
bandwidth and high data transmission rates. | bandwidth and high data transmission rates. | |||
skipping to change at page 6, line 13 ¶ | skipping to change at page 6, line 13 ¶ | |||
future when demands on capacity and packet features increases. | future when demands on capacity and packet features increases. | |||
Microwave is already today able to fully support the capacity needs | Microwave is already today able to fully support the capacity needs | |||
of a backhaul in a radio access network and will evolve to support | of a backhaul in a radio access network and will evolve to support | |||
multiple gigabits in traditional frequency bands and beyond 10 | multiple gigabits in traditional frequency bands and beyond 10 | |||
gigabits in the millimeter wave. L2 packet features are normally an | gigabits in the millimeter wave. L2 packet features are normally an | |||
integrated part of microwave nodes and more advanced L2 & L3 | integrated part of microwave nodes and more advanced L2 & L3 | |||
features will over time be introduced to support the evolution of | features will over time be introduced to support the evolution of | |||
the transport services to be provided by a backhaul/transport | the transport services to be provided by a backhaul/transport | |||
network. Note that the wireless access technologies such as 3/4/5G & | network. Note that the wireless access technologies such as 3/4/5G & | |||
Wi-Fi are not within the scope of this microwave model work. | WiFi are not within the scope of this microwave model work. | |||
The main application for microwave is backhaul for mobile broadband. | The main application for microwave is backhaul for mobile broadband. | |||
Those networks will continue to be modernized using a combination of | Those networks will continue to be modernized using a combination of | |||
microwave and fiber technologies. The choice of technology is a | microwave and fiber technologies. The choice of technology is a | |||
question about fiber presence and cost of ownership, not about | question about fiber presence and cost of ownership, not about | |||
capacity limitations in microwave. | capacity limitations in microwave. | |||
Open and standardized interfaces are a pre-requisite for efficient | Open and standardized interfaces are a pre-requisite for efficient | |||
management of equipment from multiple vendors, integrated in a | management of equipment from multiple vendors, integrated in a | |||
single system/controller. This framework addresses management and | single system/controller. This framework addresses management and | |||
control of the radio link interface(s) and the relationship to other | control of the radio link interface(s) and the relationship to other | |||
packet interfaces, typically to Ethernet interfaces, in a microwave | packet interfaces, typically to Ethernet interfaces, in a microwave | |||
node. A radio link provides the transport over the air, using one or | node. A radio link provides the transport over the air, using one or | |||
several carriers in aggregated or protected configurations. | several carriers in aggregated or protected configurations. | |||
Managing and controlling a transport service over a microwave node | Managing and controlling a transport service over a microwave node | |||
involves both radio link and packet functionality. | involves both radio link and packet functionality. | |||
Already today there are numerous IETF data models, RFCs and drafts, | Already today there are numerous IETF data models, RFCs and drafts, | |||
with technology specific extensions that cover a large part of the | with technology specific extensions that cover a large part of the | |||
packet domain. Examples are IP Management [RFC7277], Routing | packet domain. Examples are IP Management [RFC7277], Routing | |||
Management [RFC8022] and Provider Bridge [PB-YANG]. | Management [RFC8022] and Provider Bridge [PB-YANG] They are based | |||
They are based on RFC 7223 [RFC7223], which is the IETF YANG | on RFC 7223 [RFC7223], which is the IETF YANG model for Interface | |||
model for Interface Management, and is an evolution of the SNMP IF- | Management, and is an evolution of the SNMP IF-MIB [RFC2863]. | |||
MIB [RFC2863]. | ||||
Since microwave nodes will contain more and more packet | Since microwave nodes will contain more and more packet | |||
functionality which is expected to be managed using those models, | functionality which is expected to be managed using those models, | |||
there are advantages if radio link interfaces can be modeled and be | there are advantages if radio link interfaces can be modeled and be | |||
managed using the same structure and the same approach, specifically | managed using the same structure and the same approach, specifically | |||
for use cases in which a microwave node is managed as one common | for use cases in which a microwave node are managed as one common | |||
entity including both the radio link and the packet functionality, | entity including both the radio link and the packet functionality, | |||
e.g. at basic configuration of node & connections, centralized | e.g. at basic configuration of node & connections, centralized | |||
trouble shooting, upgrade and maintenance. All interfaces in a node, | trouble shooting, upgrade and maintenance. All interfaces in a node, | |||
irrespective of technology, would then be accessed from the same | irrespective of technology, would then be accessed from the same | |||
core model, i.e. RFC 7223, and could be extended with technology | core model, i.e. RFC 7223, and could be extended with technology | |||
specific parameters in models augmenting that core model. The | specific parameters in models augmenting that core model. The | |||
relationship/connectivity between interfaces could be given by the | relationship/connectivity between interfaces could be given by the | |||
physical equipment configuration, e.g. the slot in which the Radio | physical equipment configuration, e.g the slot in which the Radio | |||
Link Terminal (modem) is plugged in could be associated with a | Link Terminal (modem) is plugged in could be associated with a | |||
specific Ethernet port due to the wiring in the backplane of the | specific Ethernet port due to the wiring in the backplane of the | |||
system, or it could be flexible and therefore configured via a | system, or it could be flexible and therefore configured via a | |||
management system or controller. | management system or controller. | |||
+------------------------------------------------------------------+ | +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | |||
| Interface [RFC7223] | | | Interface [RFC7223] | | |||
| +------------------+ | | | +------------------+ | | |||
| |Ethernet Port | | | | |Ethernet Port | | | |||
| +------------------+ | | | +------------------+ | | |||
skipping to change at page 12, line 10 ¶ | skipping to change at page 12, line 10 ¶ | |||
Information and actions required by a manager/operator to | Information and actions required by a manager/operator to | |||
investigate and understand the underlying issue to a problem in the | investigate and understand the underlying issue to a problem in the | |||
performance and/or functionality of a radio link terminal and the | performance and/or functionality of a radio link terminal and the | |||
associated carrier terminations. | associated carrier terminations. | |||
6. Requirements | 6. Requirements | |||
For managing a microwave node including both the radio link and the | For managing a microwave node including both the radio link and the | |||
packet functionality, a unified data model is desired to unify the | packet functionality, a unified data model is desired to unify the | |||
modeling of the radio link interfaces and the packet interfaces | modeling of the radio link interfaces and the packet interfaces | |||
using the same structure and the same modelling approach. | using the same structure and the same modelling approach. If some | |||
part of model is generic for other technology usage, it should be | ||||
clearly stated. | ||||
The purpose of the YANG Data Model is for management and control of | The purpose of the YANG Data Model is for management and control of | |||
the radio link interface(s) and the relationship/connectivity to | the radio link interface(s) and the relationship/connectivity to | |||
other packet interfaces, typically to Ethernet interfaces, in a | other packet interfaces, typically to Ethernet interfaces, in a | |||
microwave node. | microwave node. | |||
The capability of configuring and managing microwave nodes includes | The capability of configuring and managing microwave nodes includes | |||
the following requirements for the modelling: | the following requirements for the modelling: | |||
1) It MUST be possible to configure, manage and control a radio link | 1) It MUST be possible to configure, manage and control a radio link | |||
skipping to change at page 14, line 26 ¶ | skipping to change at page 14, line 26 ¶ | |||
[I-D.ahlberg-ccamp-microwave-radio-link] provides a model proposal | [I-D.ahlberg-ccamp-microwave-radio-link] provides a model proposal | |||
for radio interfaces, which includes support for basic configuration, | for radio interfaces, which includes support for basic configuration, | |||
status and performance but lacks full support for alarm management | status and performance but lacks full support for alarm management | |||
and interface layering, i.e. the connectivity of the transported | and interface layering, i.e. the connectivity of the transported | |||
capacity (TDM & Ethernet) with other internal technology specific | capacity (TDM & Ethernet) with other internal technology specific | |||
interfaces in a microwave node. | interfaces in a microwave node. | |||
The recommendation is to use the structure of the IETF: Radio Link | The recommendation is to use the structure of the IETF: Radio Link | |||
Model [I-D.ahlberg-ccamp-microwave-radio-link] as the starting point, | Model [I-D.ahlberg-ccamp-microwave-radio-link] as the starting point, | |||
since it is a data model providing the wanted alignment with RFC | since it is a data model providing the wanted alignment with RFC | |||
7223. For the definition of the detailed leaves/parameters, the | 7223. For the definition of the detailed leafs/parameters, the | |||
recommendation is to use the IETF: Radio Link Model and the ONF: | recommendation is to use the IETF: Radio Link Model and the ONF: | |||
Microwave Modeling [ONF-model] as the basis and to define new ones | Microwave Modeling [ONF-model] as the basis and to define new ones | |||
to cover identified gaps. The parameters in those models have been | to cover identified gaps. The parameters in those models have been | |||
defined by both operators and vendors within the industry and the | defined by both operators and vendors within the industry and the | |||
implementations of the ONF Model have been tested in the Proof of | implementations of the ONF Model have been tested in the Proof of | |||
Concept events in multi-vendor environments, showing the validity of | Concept events in multi-vendor environments, showing the validity of | |||
the approach proposed in this framework document. | the approach proposed in this framework document. | |||
It is also recommended to add the required data nodes to describe | It is also recommended to add the required data nodes to describe | |||
the interface layering for the capacity provided by a radio link | the interface layering for the capacity provided by a radio link | |||
skipping to change at page 15, line 13 ¶ | skipping to change at page 15, line 13 ¶ | |||
in chapter 7.1. | in chapter 7.1. | |||
+------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ | +------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ | |||
| Generic Functionality | Recommendation | | | Generic Functionality | Recommendation | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
+------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ | +------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ | |||
|1.Fault Management | | | |1.Fault Management | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| Alarm Configuration | New Radio Link Model | | | Alarm Configuration | New Radio Link Model | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| Alarm notifications/ | [I-D.vallin-netmod- | | | Alarm notifications/ | [I-D.vallin-ccamp- | | |||
| synchronization | alarm-module] | | | synchronization | alarm-module] | | |||
+------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ | +------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ | |||
|2.Performance Management | | | |2.Performance Management | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| Performance Configuration/ | New Radio Link Model | | | Performance Configuration/ | New Radio Link Model | | |||
| Activation | | | | Activation | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| Performance Collection | New Radio Link Model & | | | Performance Collection | New Radio Link Model & | | |||
| | XML files | | | | XML files | | |||
+------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ | +------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ | |||
|3.Physical/Equipment Inventory | [I-D.ietf-netmod-entity] | | |3.Physical/Equipment Inventory | [I-D.ietf-netmod-entity] | | |||
+------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ | +------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ | |||
Figure 4. Recommendation on how to support generic functionality | Figure 4. Recommendation on how to support generic functionality | |||
Microwave specific alarm configurations are recommended to be | Microwave specific alarm configurations are recommended to be | |||
included in the new radio link model and could be based on what is | included in the new radio link model and could be based on what is | |||
supported in the IETF and ONF Radio Link Models. Alarm notifications | supported in the IETF and ONF Radio Link Models. Alarm notifications | |||
and synchronization are general and is recommended to be supported | and synchronization are general and is recommended to be supported | |||
by a generic model, such as [I-D.vallin-netmod-alarm-module]. | by a generic model, such as [I-D.vallin-ccamp-alarm-module]. | |||
Activation of interval counters & thresholds could be a generic | Activation of interval counters & thresholds could be a generic | |||
function but it is recommended to be supported by the new radio link | function but it is recommended to be supported by the new radio link | |||
specific model and can be based on both the ONF and IETF Microwave | specific model and can be based on both the ONF and IETF Microwave | |||
Radio Link models. | Radio Link models. | |||
Collection of interval/historical counters is a generic function | Collection of interval/historical counters is a generic function | |||
that needs to be supported in a node. File based collection via SFTP | that needs to be supported in a node. File based collection via SFTP | |||
and collection via a Netconf/YANG interfaces are two possible | and collection via a Netconf/YANG interfaces are two possible | |||
options and the recommendation is to include support for the latter | options and the recommendation is to include support for the latter | |||
skipping to change at page 16, line 23 ¶ | skipping to change at page 16, line 23 ¶ | |||
2) Use the structure in the IETF: Radio Link Model [I-D.ahlberg- | 2) Use the structure in the IETF: Radio Link Model [I-D.ahlberg- | |||
ccamp-microwave-radio-link] as the starting point. It augments | ccamp-microwave-radio-link] as the starting point. It augments | |||
RFC 7223 and is thereby as required aligned with the structure | RFC 7223 and is thereby as required aligned with the structure | |||
of the models for management of the packet domain. | of the models for management of the packet domain. | |||
3) Use established microwave equipment and radio standards, such | 3) Use established microwave equipment and radio standards, such | |||
as ETSI EN 302 217 [EN 302 217-2], and the IETF: Radio Link | as ETSI EN 302 217 [EN 302 217-2], and the IETF: Radio Link | |||
Model [I-D.ahlberg-ccamp-microwave-radio-link] and the | Model [I-D.ahlberg-ccamp-microwave-radio-link] and the | |||
ONF: Microwave Modeling [ONF-model] as the basis for the | ONF: Microwave Modeling [ONF-model] as the basis for the | |||
definition of the detailed leaves/parameters to support the | definition of the detailed leafs/parameters to support the | |||
specified use cases and requirements, and proposing new ones | specified use cases and requirements, and proposing new ones | |||
to cover identified gaps. | to cover identified gaps. | |||
4) Add the required data nodes to describe the interface layering | 4) Add the required data nodes to describe the interface layering | |||
for the capacity provided by a radio link terminal and the | for the capacity provided by a radio link terminal and the | |||
associated Ethernet and TDM interfaces, using the principles | associated Ethernet and TDM interfaces, using the principles | |||
and data nodes for interface layering described in RFC 7223 as | and data nodes for interface layering described in RFC 7223 as | |||
a basis. | a basis. | |||
5) Include support for configuration of microwave specific alarms | 5) Include support for configuration of microwave specific alarms | |||
in the Microwave Radio Link model and rely on a generic model | in the Microwave Radio Link model and rely on a generic model | |||
such as [I.D.vallin-netmod-alarm-module] for notifications and | such as [I.D.vallin-ccamp-alarm-module] for notifications and | |||
alarm synchronization. | alarm synchronization. | |||
6) Use a generic model such as [I-D.ietf-netmod-entity] for | 6) Use a generic model such as [I-D.ietf-netmod-entity] for | |||
physical/equipment inventory. | physical/equipment inventory. | |||
It is furthermore recommended that the Microwave Radio Link YANG | It is furthermore recommended that the Microwave Radio Link YANG | |||
Date Model should be validated by both operators and vendors as | Date Model should be validated by both operators and vendors as | |||
part of the process to make it stable and mature. | part of the process to make it stable and mature. During the | |||
Hackathon in IETF 99, a project "SDN Applications for microwave | ||||
radio link via IETF YANG Data Model" successfully validated this | ||||
framework and the YANG data model[I.D.ietf-ccamp-mw-yang]. The | ||||
project also received the BEST OVERALL award from the Hackathon. | ||||
8. Security Considerations | 8. Security Considerations | |||
TBD | TBD | |||
9. IANA Considerations | 9. IANA Considerations | |||
This memo includes no request to IANA. | This memo includes no request to IANA. | |||
10. References | 10. References | |||
skipping to change at page 17, line 42 ¶ | skipping to change at page 17, line 42 ¶ | |||
[I-D.ahlberg-ccamp-microwave-radio-link] | [I-D.ahlberg-ccamp-microwave-radio-link] | |||
Ahlberg, J., Carlson, J., Lund, H., Olausson, T., Ye, M., | Ahlberg, J., Carlson, J., Lund, H., Olausson, T., Ye, M., | |||
and M. Vaupotic, "Microwave Radio Link YANG Data Models", | and M. Vaupotic, "Microwave Radio Link YANG Data Models", | |||
draft-ahlberg-ccamp-microwave-radio-link-01 (work in | draft-ahlberg-ccamp-microwave-radio-link-01 (work in | |||
progress), May 2016. | progress), May 2016. | |||
[I-D.ietf-netmod-entity] | [I-D.ietf-netmod-entity] | |||
Bierman A., Bjorklund M., Dong J., Romascanu D., "A YANG | Bierman A., Bjorklund M., Dong J., Romascanu D., "A YANG | |||
Data Model for Entity Management", draft-ietf-netmod- | Data Model for Entity Management", draft-ietf-netmod- | |||
entity-03 (work in progress), March 2017. | entity-05 (work in progress), October 2017. | |||
[I-D.vallin-netmod-alarm-module] | [I-D.vallin-ccamp-alarm-module] | |||
Vallin S. and Bjorklund M., "YANG Alarm Module", draft- | Vallin S. and Bjorklund M., "YANG Alarm Module", draft- | |||
vallin-netmod-alarm-module-02 (work in progress), May | vallin-ccamp-alarm-module-00 (work in progress), October | |||
2016. | 2017. | |||
[RFC8022] Lhotka, L. and A. Lindem, "A YANG Data Model for Routing | [RFC8022] Lhotka, L. and A. Lindem, "A YANG Data Model for Routing | |||
Management", RFC 8022, DOI 10.17487/RFC8022, | Management", RFC 8022, DOI 10.17487/RFC8022, November 2016 | |||
November 2016, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8022>. | ||||
[I.D.zhang-ccamp-l1-topo-yang] | [I.D.zhang-ccamp-l1-topo-yang] | |||
Zhang X., Rao B., Sharma A., Liu X., "A YANG Data Model | Zhang X., Rao B., Sharma A., Liu X., "A YANG Data Model | |||
for Layer 1 (ODU) Network Topology", draft-zhang-ccamp-l1- | for Layer 1 (ODU) Network Topology", draft-zhang-ccamp-l1- | |||
topo-yang-03 (work in progress), July 2016. | topo-yang-03 (work in progress), July 2016. | |||
[I.D.ietf-ospf-yang] | [I.D.ietf-ospf-yang] | |||
Yeung D., Qu Y., Zhang J., Bogdanovic D., Sreenivasa K., | Yeung D., Qu Y., Zhang J., Bogdanovic D., Sreenivasa K., | |||
"Yang Data Model for OSPF Protocol", draft-ietf-ospf-yang- | "Yang Data Model for OSPF Protocol", draft-ietf-ospf-yang- | |||
05,(work in progress), July 2016. | 05,(work in progress), July 2016. | |||
[ONF-model] | [ONF-model] | |||
"Microwave Modeling - ONF Wireless Transport Group", May | "Microwave Modeling - ONF Wireless Transport Group", May | |||
2016. | 2016. | |||
[ONF CIM] | [ONF CIM] | |||
"Core Information Model", ONF TR-512, ONF, September 2016 | "Core Information Model", ONF TR-512, ONF, September 2016 | |||
[PB-YANG] "IEEE 802.1X and 802.1Q YANG models, Marc,H.", October | [PB-YANG] "IEEE 802.1X and 802.1Q YANG models", Marc,H., October | |||
2015. | 2015. | |||
[EN 302 217-2] | [EN 302 217-2] | |||
ETSI, "Fixed Radio Systems; Characteristics and | ETSI, "Fixed Radio Systems; Characteristics and | |||
requirements for point to-point equipment and antennas; | requirements for point to-point equipment and antennas; | |||
Part 2: Digital systems operating in frequency bands from | Part 2: Digital systems operating in frequency bands from | |||
1 GHz to 86 GHz; Harmonised Standard covering the | 1 GHz to 86 GHz; Harmonised Standard covering the | |||
essential requirements of article 3.2 of Directive | essential requirements of article 3.2 of Directive | |||
2014/53/EU", EN 302 217-2 V3.1.1, May 2017. | 2014/53/EU", EN 302 217-2 V3.1.1, May 2017. | |||
[I.D.ietf-ccamp-mw-yang] | ||||
Ahlberg, J., Ye, M., Li,X., Kawada K., Bernardos C., | ||||
Spreafico D., Vaupotic M., "A YANG Data Model for | ||||
Microwave Radio Link", draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-yang-01,(work | ||||
in progress), July 2016. | ||||
Authors' Addresses | Authors' Addresses | |||
Jonas Ahlberg | Jonas Ahlberg | |||
Ericsson AB | Ericsson AB | |||
Lindholmspiren 11 | Lindholmspiren 11 | |||
Goeteborg 417 56 | Goeteborg 417 56 | |||
Sweden | Sweden | |||
Email: jonas.ahlberg@ericsson.com | Email: jonas.ahlberg@ericsson.com | |||
Luis M. Contreras | Luis M. Contreras | |||
Telefonica I+D | Telefonica I+D | |||
Ronda de la Comunicacion, S/N | Ronda de la Comunicacion, S/N | |||
Madrid 28050 | Madrid 28050 | |||
Spain | Spain | |||
Email: luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com | Email: luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com | |||
Ye Min (Amy) | Ye Min | |||
Huawei Technologies CO., Ltd | Huawei Technologies CO., Ltd | |||
No.1899, Xiyuan Avenue | No.1899, Xiyuan Avenue | |||
Chengdu 611731 | Chengdu 611731 | |||
P.R.China | P.R.China | |||
Email: amy.yemin@huawei.com | Email: amy.yemin@huawei.com | |||
Marko Vaupotic | Marko Vaupotic | |||
Aviat Networks | Aviat Networks | |||
Motnica 9 | Motnica 9 | |||
skipping to change at line 902 ¶ | skipping to change at page 20, line 35 ¶ | |||
Email: i-akiyoshi@ah.jp.nec.com | Email: i-akiyoshi@ah.jp.nec.com | |||
Carlos J. Bernardos | Carlos J. Bernardos | |||
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid | Universidad Carlos III de Madrid | |||
Av. Universidad, 30 | Av. Universidad, 30 | |||
Leganes, Madrid 28911 | Leganes, Madrid 28911 | |||
Spain | Spain | |||
Email: cjbc@it.uc3m.es | Email: cjbc@it.uc3m.es | |||
Daniela Spreafico | ||||
Nokia - IT | ||||
Via Energy Park, 14 | ||||
Vimercate (MI) 20871 | ||||
Italy | ||||
Email: daniela.spreafico@nokia.com | ||||
End of changes. 25 change blocks. | ||||
30 lines changed or deleted | 43 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.46. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ |