--- 1/draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-01.txt	2006-02-04 22:57:54.000000000 +0100
+++ 2/draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt	2006-02-04 22:57:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
 
 CCAMP Working Group                       K. Kompella (Juniper Networks)
 Internet Draft                            Y. Rekhter  (Juniper Networks)
-Expiration Date: May 2002                 A. Banerjee (Calient Networks)
+Expiration Date: July 2002                A. Banerjee (Calient Networks)
                                           J. Drake    (Calient Networks)
                                           G. Bernstein (Ciena)
                                           D. Fedyk    (Nortel Networks)
                                           E. Mannie   (GTS Network)
                                           D. Saha     (Tellium)
                                           V. Sharma   (Metanoia, Inc.)
 
              OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS
 
-                draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-01.txt
+                draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt
 
 1. Status of this Memo
 
    This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
    all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
 
    Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
    Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
    other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
    Drafts.
@@ -221,20 +221,24 @@
    information.
 
    When the Switching Capability field is TDM, the specific information
    includes Minimum LSP Bandwidth, which is is encoded in a 4 octets
    field in the IEEE floating point format. The units are bytes (not
    bits!) per second.
 
    When the Switching Capability field is LSC, there is no specific
    information.
 
+   The Interface Switching Capability Descriptor sub-TLV may occur more
+   than once within the Link TLV  (this is needed to handle interfaces
+   that support multiple switching capabilities).
+
 6. Security Considerations
 
    The sub-TLVs proposed in this document does not raise any new
    security concerns.
 
 7. Acknowledgements
 
    The authors would like to thank Suresh Katukam, Jonathan Lang and
    Quaizar Vohra for their comments on the draft.