draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-06.txt   draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-07.txt 
Network Working Group O. Finkelman Network Working Group O. Finkelman
Internet-Draft Qwilt Internet-Draft Qwilt
Intended status: Standards Track S. Mishra Intended status: Standards Track S. Mishra
Expires: March 26, 2020 Verizon Expires: March 26, 2020 Verizon
September 23, 2019 September 23, 2019
CDNI Request Routing Extensions CDNI Request Routing Extensions
draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-06 draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-07
Abstract Abstract
Open Caching is a use case of Content Delivery Networks Open Caching is a use case of Content Delivery Networks
Interconnetion (CDNI) in which the commercial Content Delivery Interconnetion (CDNI) in which the commercial Content Delivery
Network (CDN) is the upstream CDN (uCDN) and the ISP caching layer Network (CDN) is the upstream CDN (uCDN) and the ISP caching layer
serves as the downstream CDN (dCDN). The extensions specified in serves as the downstream CDN (dCDN). The extensions specified in
this document to the CDNI Metadata and FCI interfaces are derived this document to the CDNI Metadata and FCI interfaces are derived
from requirements raised by Open Caching but are also applicable to from requirements raised by Open Caching but are also applicable to
CDNI use cases in general. CDNI use cases in general.
skipping to change at page 15, line 41 skipping to change at page 15, line 41
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005, RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986>.
[RFC6707] Niven-Jenkins, B., Le Faucheur, F., and N. Bitar, "Content
Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI) Problem
Statement", RFC 6707, DOI 10.17487/RFC6707, September
2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6707>.
[RFC7231] Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer [RFC7231] Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer
Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content", RFC 7231, Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content", RFC 7231,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7231, June 2014, DOI 10.17487/RFC7231, June 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7231>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7231>.
[RFC7336] Peterson, L., Davie, B., and R. van Brandenburg, Ed.,
"Framework for Content Distribution Network
Interconnection (CDNI)", RFC 7336, DOI 10.17487/RFC7336,
August 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7336>.
[RFC7975] Niven-Jenkins, B., Ed. and R. van Brandenburg, Ed., [RFC7975] Niven-Jenkins, B., Ed. and R. van Brandenburg, Ed.,
"Request Routing Redirection Interface for Content "Request Routing Redirection Interface for Content
Delivery Network (CDN) Interconnection", RFC 7975, Delivery Network (CDN) Interconnection", RFC 7975,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7975, October 2016, DOI 10.17487/RFC7975, October 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7975>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7975>.
[RFC8006] Niven-Jenkins, B., Murray, R., Caulfield, M., and K. Ma, [RFC8006] Niven-Jenkins, B., Murray, R., Caulfield, M., and K. Ma,
"Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) "Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI)
Metadata", RFC 8006, DOI 10.17487/RFC8006, December 2016, Metadata", RFC 8006, DOI 10.17487/RFC8006, December 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8006>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8006>.
skipping to change at page 16, line 27 skipping to change at page 16, line 38
(CDNI) Request Routing: Footprint and Capabilities (CDNI) Request Routing: Footprint and Capabilities
Semantics", RFC 8008, DOI 10.17487/RFC8008, December 2016, Semantics", RFC 8008, DOI 10.17487/RFC8008, December 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8008>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8008>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
7.2. Informative References 7.2. Informative References
[RFC6707] Niven-Jenkins, B., Le Faucheur, F., and N. Bitar, "Content
Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI) Problem
Statement", RFC 6707, DOI 10.17487/RFC6707, September
2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6707>.
[RFC7336] Peterson, L., Davie, B., and R. van Brandenburg, Ed.,
"Framework for Content Distribution Network
Interconnection (CDNI)", RFC 7336, DOI 10.17487/RFC7336,
August 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7336>.
[RFC7736] Ma, K., "Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) [RFC7736] Ma, K., "Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI)
Media Type Registration", RFC 7736, DOI 10.17487/RFC7736, Media Type Registration", RFC 7736, DOI 10.17487/RFC7736,
December 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7736>. December 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7736>.
[RFC7871] Contavalli, C., van der Gaast, W., Lawrence, D., and W. [RFC7871] Contavalli, C., van der Gaast, W., Lawrence, D., and W.
Kumari, "Client Subnet in DNS Queries", RFC 7871, Kumari, "Client Subnet in DNS Queries", RFC 7871,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7871, May 2016, DOI 10.17487/RFC7871, May 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7871>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7871>.
Authors' Addresses Authors' Addresses
 End of changes. 4 change blocks. 
11 lines changed or deleted 11 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.47. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/