Network Working Group                                        R. Gagliano
Internet-Draft                                                    LACNIC
Updates: 3971 (if approved)                                  S. Krishnan
Intended status: Standards Track                                Ericsson
Expires: August 8, September 7, 2010                                      A. Kukec
                                                    University of Zagreb
                                                       February 04,
                                                          March 06, 2010

                     SEND Name Type field Registry
               draft-ietf-csi-send-name-type-registry-01
               draft-ietf-csi-send-name-type-registry-02

Abstract

   SEcure Neighbor Discovery (SEND) defines the Name Type field in the
   Trust Anchor option.  This document request requests to IANA the creation and
   management of a registry for this field.  This document also
   specifies a new Name Type field based on a certificate Subject Key
   Identifier (SKI).

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 8, September 7, 2010.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the BSD License.

   This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
   Contributions published or made publicly available before November
   10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
   material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
   modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
   Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
   the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
   outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
   not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
   it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
   than English.

Table of Contents

   1.  Requirements notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   3.  SEND SKI trust anchor option Name Type field.  . . . field  . . . . . . . . . 5
     3.1.  Processing Rules for Router . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
   6.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

1.  Requirements notation

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

2.  Introduction

   SEcure Neighbor Discovery [RFC3971] (SEND) utilizes X.509v3
   certificates that include the [RFC3779] extension for IPv6 addresses
   to certify a router authority over an IPv6 prefix for NDP (Neighbor
   Discovery Protocol).  The Trust Anchor Option in section 6.4.3 of RFC
   3971 allows the identification of the Trust Anchor (TA) selected by
   the host.  In that same section, two name types were defined, defined: the DER
   Encoded X.501 Name and a Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN).  This
   document request to IANA the creation and management of a registry
   for this field.

   In any Public Key Infrastructure, the subject name of a certificate
   is only unique within each CA.  Consequently, a new option to
   identify TAs across CAs is needed.

   In [I-D.ietf-csi-send-cert] the certificate profile described in
   [I-D.ietf-sidr-res-certs] is adopted for SEND.  In these documents,
   the Subject field in the certificates are declared to be meaningless
   and the subjectAltName field is not allowed.  On the other hand, the
   Subject Key Identifier (SKI) extension for the X.509 certificates is
   defined as mandatory and non-critical.

   This document specifies a new Name Type field in the SEND TA option
   that allows to use of the SKI X.509 extension to identify TA X.509
   certificates.

3.  SEND SKI trust anchor option Name Type field. field

   Name Type

   3 SHA-1 Subject Key Identifier (SKI)

   The Key Identifier used here is the 160-bit SHA-1 hash of the value
   of the DER-encoded ASN.1 bit string of the subject public key, as
   described in Section 4.2.1.2 of [RFC5280].

3.1.  Processing Rules for Router

   As described specified in RFC 3971, [RFC3971] , a TA is identified by the SEND TA option.
   If the TA option is represented as a SHA-1 SKI, then the SKI must be
   equal to the SKI extension in the trust anchor's certificate
   calculated as described in [draft-ietf-sidr-res-certs-17].  The
   router SHOULD include the TA option(s) in the advertisement for which
   the certification path was found.

   If  Also, following [RFC3971]
   specification, if the router is unable to find a path to the
   requested anchor, it SHOULD send an advertisement without any
   certificate.  In this case, the router SHOULD include the TA options
   that were solicited.

4.  IANA Considerations

   IANA will maintains the registry of Name Type field in the ICMP Trust
   Anchor option.  The registry records Name Type fields for the ICMP
   Trust Anchor option (15) defined in the RFC 3971.

   The following Name Type fields are defined:

   1 DER Encoded X.501 Name (RFC 3971).

   2 FQDN (RFC 3971)

   3 SHA-1 Subject Key Identifier (SKI) (Section 3)

   New assignments of Name Type field is through Standards Action.

5.  Security Considerations

   No security considerations.

6.  Normative References

   [I-D.ietf-csi-send-cert]
              Krishnan, S., Kukec, A., and R. Gagliano, "Certificate
              profile and certificate management for SEND",
              draft-ietf-csi-send-cert-00 (work in progress), July 2009.

   [I-D.ietf-sidr-res-certs]
              Huston, G., Michaelson, G., and R. Loomans, "A Profile for
              X.509 PKIX Resource Certificates",
              draft-ietf-sidr-res-certs-17 (work in progress),
              September 2009.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC3779]  Lynn, C., Kent, S., and K. Seo, "X.509 Extensions for IP
              Addresses and AS Identifiers", RFC 3779, June 2004.

   [RFC3971]  Arkko, J., Kempf, J., Zill, B., and P. Nikander, "SEcure
              Neighbor Discovery (SEND)", RFC 3971, March 2005.

   [RFC5280]  Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
              Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
              Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
              (CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, May 2008.

Authors' Addresses

   Roque Gagliano
   LACNIC
   Rambla Rep Mexico 6125
   Montevideo,   11400
   Uruguay

   Email: roque@lacnic.net

   Suresh Krishnan
   Ericsson
   8400 Decarie Blvd.
   Town of Mount Royal, QC
   Canada

   Phone: +1 514 345 7900 x42871
   Email: suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com

   Ana Kukec
   University of Zagreb
   Unska 3
   Zagreb
   Croatia

   Email: ana.kukec@fer.hr