Network Working Group R. Droms (ed.) Internet-Draft Cisco Systems Expires:
September 30, 2002 Apr 2002August 29, 2003 February 28, 2003 DNS Configuration options for DHCPv6 draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsconfig-02.txtdraft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsconfig-03.txt Status of this Memo This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. This Internet-Draft will expire on September 30, 2002.August 29, 2003. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).(2003). All Rights Reserved. Abstract This document describes DHCPv6 options for passing a list of available DNS Serversresolvers and a domain search list to a client. 1. Introduction This document describes two options for passing configuration information related to Domain Name Service (DNS) [1, 2]6] in DHCPv6 .. 2. RequirementsTerminology The key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119 . 3. TerminologyThis document uses terminology specific to IPv6 and DHCPv6 as defined in section "Terminology" of the DHCP specification. 4. Domain Name Serverspecification . 3. DNS Resolver option The Domain Name ServerDNS Resolver option provides a list of one or more IPIPv6 addresses of DNS serversrecursive resolvers to which a client's DNS resolver MAY send DNS queries .. The DNS servers are listed in the order of preference for use by the client resolver. The format of the Domain Name ServerDNS Resolver option is: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | OPTION_DNS_SERVERSOPTION_DNS_RESOLVERS | option-len | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | DNS-server (IPDNS-resolver (IPv6 address) | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | DNS-server (IPDNS-resolver (IPv6 address) | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ... | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ option-code: OPTION_DNS_SERVERSOPTION_DNS_RESOLVERS (tbd) option-length:option-len: Length of the 'options' fieldlist of DNS resolvers in octets; must be a multiple of 16 DNS-server: IPIPv6 address of DNS server 5.resolver 4. Domain Search List option A server sends aThe Domain Search List option to the DHCP client to specifyspecifies the domain search list the client is to use when resolving hostnames with DNS. This option does not apply to other name resolution mechanisms. The format of the Domain Search List option is: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | OPTION_DOMAIN_LIST | option-len | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | searchstring | | ... | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ option-code: OPTION_DOMAIN_LIST (tbd) option-length:option-len: Length of the 'searchstring' field in octets searchstring: The specification of the list of domain names in the Domain Search List The list of domain names in the 'searchstring' MUST be encoded as specified in section "Representation and use of domain names" of the DHCPv6 specification . 6.. 5. Appearance of these options The Domain Name Server option MUST NOT appear onlyin other than the following messages: Solicit, Advertise, Request, Confirm,Renew, Rebind, Information-Request, Reply. The Domain Search List option MUST NOT appear onlyin other than the following messages: Solicit, Advertise, Request, Confirm,Renew, Rebind, Information-Request, Reply. 7.6. Security Considerations The Domain Name ServerDNS Resolver option may be used by an intruder DHCP server to cause DHCP clients to send DNS queries to an intruder DNS server.resolver. The results of these misdirected DNS queries may be used to spoof DNS names. To avoid attacks through the DNS Resolver option, the DHCP client SHOULD require DHCP authentication (see section "Authentication of DHCP messages" in the DHCPv6 specification) before installing a list of DNS resolvers obtained through authenticated DHCP . The Domain Search List option may be used by an intruder DHCP server to cause DHCP clients to search through invalid domains for incompletely specified domain names. The results of these misdirected searches may be used to spoof DNS names. To avoid attacks through the Domain Name Server option,Note that support for DNSSEC  will not avert this attack, because the DHCP client SHOULD use authenticated DHCP (see section "Authentication of DHCP messages"resource records in the DHCPv6 specification). Because the Domain Search List optioninvalid domains may be usedlegitimately signed. The degree to spoof DNS name resolutionwhich a host is vulnerable to attack via an invalid domain search option is determined in part by DNS resolver behavior. RFC1535  contains a waydiscussion of security weaknesses related to implicit as well as explicit domain searchlists, and provides recommendations relating to resolver searchlist processing. Section 6 of RFC1536  also addresses this vulnerability, and recommends that cannotresolvers: 1. Use searchlists only when explicitly specified; no implicit searchlists should be detectedused. 2. Resolve a name that contains any dots by DNS security mechanisms like DNSSEC , DHCP clientsfirst trying it as an FQDN and if that fails, with the names in the searchlist appended. 3. Resolve a name containing no dots by appending with the searchlist right away, but once again, no implicit searchlists should be used. In order to minimize potential vulnerabilities it is recommended that: 1. Hosts implementing the domain search option SHOULD also implement the searchlist recommendations of RFC1536, section 6. 2. Where DNS parameters such as the domain searchlist or DNS servers MUSThave been manually configured, these parameters SHOULD NOT be overridden by DHCP. 3. A host SHOULD require the use authenticatedof DHCP when a Domain Search List option is includedauthentication (see section "Authentication of DHCP messages" in the DHCPv6 specification) prior to accepting a DHCP message. 8.domain search option. 7. IANA Considerations IANA is requested to assign an option code to these options from the option-code space defined in section "DHCPv6 Options" of the DHCPv6 specification . References  Mockapetris, P.,. 8. Acknowledgments This option was originally part of the DHCPv6 specification, written by Jim Bound, Mike Carney, Charlie Perkins, Ted Lemon, Bernie Volz and Ralph Droms. The analysis of the potential attack through the domain search list is taken from the specification of the DHCPv4 Domain Search option, RFC3397 . Thanks to Rob Austein, Alain Durand, Peter Koch, Tony Lindstrom and Pekka Savola for their contributions to this document. 9. Changes from draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsconfig-02.txt This document includes the following changes in response to comments made during the dhc/dnsext WG last call: o Combined RFC2119 reference and reference to DHCPv6 specification into one "Terminology" section; added explicit normative reference to DHCPv6 specification. o Changed name of "Domain Name Server" option to "DNS Resolver" option. o Clarified and corrected filed names - conceptsand facilities", STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987. descriptions of fields in the option format diagrams. o Reworded "Appearance of these options" for clarity; removed Confirm from list of messages in which the options can appear. o Clarified the type of attack that can be mounted through the Domain Search List option by copying text from RFC3997 Normative References  Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987.  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.  Bound, J., Carney, M., Perkins, C., Lemon, T., Volz, B. and R. Droms (ed.), "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)", draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-23 (workRFC XXXX, TBD 2003.  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in progress), February 2002. RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.  Eastlake, D., "Domain Name System Security Extensions", RFC 2535, March 1999.  Kumar, A., Postel, J., Neuman, C., Danzig, P. and S. Miller, "Common DNS Implementation Errors and Suggested Fixes", RFC 1536, October 1993. Normative References  Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities", STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987.  Gavron, E., "A Security Problem and Proposed Correction With Widely Deployed DNS Software", RFC 1535, October 1993.  Aboba, B. and S. Cheshire, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Domain Search Option", RFC 3397, November 2002. Author's Address Ralph Droms (ed.) Cisco Systems 250 Apollo Drive Chelmsford, MA 01824 USA Phone: +1 978 497 4733 EMail: firstname.lastname@example.org Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).(2003). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.